Don’t be thin skinned if you engage in theological discussions

[@davevandervelde4799]

Miss you Chris. Always love you comments. Of coarse Warren is fine to post videos that literally put words in peoples mouths.

[@rocketsurgeon1746]

Also, avoid ad hominem, strawmen, red herrings, etc. simply answer the opponent's questions quickly and concisely or you come across as dishonest. Unelect babies is a great example. Calvinists need to answer "yes, unelect babies go to hell, because election is prior to birth". Quick, concise and honest

[@chrisharris9710]

@@rocketsurgeon1746 that’s dumb. These things necessitate nuance. Especially something that has no dogmatic Scriptural explanation.

[@rocketsurgeon1746]

@@chrisharris9710 how is it dumb?
1. Election is before birth NOT based on works
2. Baby is born and already elect or unelect
3. They already have their nature based on elect or not
4. How is time going to change anything?
According to calvinism, election is dogmatic and before birth. Thoughts?

[@rocketsurgeon1746]

@@chrisharris9710 what is nuanced about election?It is before birth and we cannot change that. Time won't change an unelect baby into an elect baby or visa versa, will it?

[@rocketsurgeon1746]

@@chrisharris9710 election has no dogmatic Scriptural explanation?

[@chrisharris9710]

@@rocketsurgeon1746 infants who die in infancy………. But you knew that already.