PERFECT EDUCATION FOR INTELLIGENT UNMARRIED MEN. YES, I AM IN SEARCH OF THESE ANSWERS STILL NOW. THIS KNOWLEDGE WILL HAVE ONLY WITH THEIR WIFE FOR SOME YEARS. SO MARRIED MEN ONLY CAN ANSWER. NOT BAD. BUT THIS VIDEO IS GOOD
ఒక గొప్ప వాదాన్నీ, అందులో పాల్గొన్న వారినీ ఇలా హాస్యాస్పదంగా చూపిన ఆ దర్శక, నిర్మాతలకు అసలు కళాభిరుచి కానీ, ఆధ్యాత్మిక విషయాల పై అవగాహన కానీ, హైందవ ధర్మం పట్ల గౌరవం కానీ, లేదనే చెప్పాలి. నటులు చేత కూడా అతి గా నటింపజేశారు.
in this dialogue, i see the following things: 1. that women were as highly educated as men. 2. that even great scholars are prone to ego. 3. that scholarly debates are conducted under strict rules ensuring that the debaters do not lose their cool during the debate and it does not become a shouting match. 4. that the person sitting in the position of judge need not get up even if that person's husband is sitting. (as per the norms of the day, a wife was not expected to remain sitting when her husband had stood up) 5. that once a woman was given the position of the judge, she had to remain impartial no matter what. 6. that the debate was on dwaita-adwaita siddhantam; a very deep concept that could not be understood easily. 7. that all proofs had to be given using logic, reaasoning and solid proofs given in the vedic texts. 8. now, it will appear to be foolish, misleading and demeaning for the prestige of both Mandana Mishra and Adi Shankara. However, all i see is that it is a clash of titans - equally talented and highly learned men. I saw the Sanskrit version of the movie and i couldn't connect much to the scenes at all. the scene where the Chandala opens Asi Shankara's eyes was as bland as the debate scene between Mandana Mishra and Adi Shankara. for a layman, the Telugu vesrion is quite enlightening while the Sanskrit version doesn't tell him much. All i saw in the Sanskrit version was that a debate took place for 17 days. the actual debate was not shown - not even a few questions and answers that could shed some light on the nature of the debate. Despite the overaction, this movie connects to the layman better than the Sanskrit version. I don't know about the technicalities of the movie or whether it is factually correct or whether it is misleading, but i was able to connect and understand why Adi Shankaracharya became so great.
So much difference between languages adi language was Sanskrit, no more telgu,Tamil, kannada, lastly Malayalam. You can't imagine the best of adi shankara. May god Vishnu bless you ai 👍
Debate between adi shankara n mandana mishra s considered as one of the best debate. Most philosophical points like maha vakyas, vedas and vedantas have been discussed. Especially advaitha philosophy was proved by vedantic texts. In this scene the advaitha philosophy is completely mislead. No point in having the funny conversations and egoistic expressions. And the examples given to prove the advaitha and karma kanda was baseless.
E movie okkate kaadu serials kuda alane tayaru ayyayi. Ishtamochinattu teesiparesthunaru movies and serials. Legal ga edana action teesukuntey thappa ilanti dushpracharalani aapalemu 😞
Why Telugu movies do have so aggressiveness in dialogue delivery and background music...? Shankara's dialogue delivery has to be soft because yogis never speak aggressively... I don't understand Telugu. But each dialogue gives me palpitation...!!
వారిష్టమొచ్చినట్లు చలనచిత్రాన్ని నిర్మించారు. అదో దిక్కుమాలిన సంత. 1980 కాలంలో అద్భుతమైన చలనచిత్రం తీసారు. దానితో పోల్చుకొంటే ఇది చాల అసహ్యకరముగా ఉన్నది.
in this dialogue, i see the following things: 1. that women were as highly educated as men. 2. that even great scholars are prone to ego. 3. that scholarly debates are conducted under strict rules ensuring that the debaters do not lose their cool during the debate and it does not become a shouting match. 4. that the person sitting in the position of judge need not get up even if that person's husband is sitting. (as per the norms of the day, a wife was not expected to remain sitting when her husband had stood up) 5. that once a woman was given the position of the judge, she had to remain impartial no matter what. 6. that the debate was on dwaita-adwaita siddhantam; a very deep concept that could not be understood easily. 7. that all proofs had to be given using logic, reaasoning and solid proofs given in the vedic texts. 8. now, it will appear to be foolish, misleading and demeaning for the prestige of both Mandana Mishra and Adi Shankara. However, all i see is that it is a clash of titans - equally talented and highly learned men. I saw the Sanskrit version of the movie and i couldn't connect much to the scenes at all. the scene where the Chandala opens Asi Shankara's eyes was as bland as the debate scene between Mandana Mishra and Adi Shankara. for a layman, the Telugu vesrion is quite enlightening while the Sanskrit version doesn't tell him much. All i saw in the Sanskrit version was that a debate took place for 17 days. the actual debate was not shown - not even a few questions and answers that could shed some light on the nature of the debate. Despite the overaction, this movie connects to the layman better than the Sanskrit version. I don't know about the technicalities of the movie or whether it is factually correct or whether it is misleading, but i was able to connect and understand why Adi Shankaracharya became so great.
South India makes Movies like Action. Mandan Mishr was a Brahman just like AdiShankarAcharya. A Pleasant Shastrarth took place for Days. Thus, A Great Movie in Sanskrit from Kerala in Sanskrit AdiShankarAcharya to be Great.
Do not criticise South Indian movies just because of this movie. The Sanskrit movie on Shankaracharya was made by G.V Iyer who is a South Indian. Stop teasing South Indians. Anyways, did you even understand a single word in this😂
in this dialogue, i see the following things: 1. that women were as highly educated as men. 2. that even great scholars are prone to ego. 3. that scholarly debates are conducted under strict rules ensuring that the debaters do not lose their cool during the debate and it does not become a shouting match. 4. that the person sitting in the position of judge need not get up even if that person's husband is sitting. (as per the norms of the day, a wife was not expected to remain sitting when her husband had stood up) 5. that once a woman was given the position of the judge, she had to remain impartial no matter what. 6. that the debate was on dwaita-adwaita siddhantam; a very deep concept that could not be understood easily. 7. that all proofs had to be given using logic, reaasoning and solid proofs given in the vedic texts. 8. now, it will appear to be foolish, misleading and demeaning for the prestige of both Mandana Mishra and Adi Shankara. However, all i see is that it is a clash of titans - equally talented and highly learned men. I saw the Sanskrit version of the movie and i couldn't connect much to the scenes at all. the scene where the Chandala opens Asi Shankara's eyes was as bland as the debate scene between Mandana Mishra and Adi Shankara. for a layman, the Telugu vesrion is quite enlightening while the Sanskrit version doesn't tell him much. All i saw in the Sanskrit version was that a debate took place for 17 days. the actual debate was not shown - not even a few questions and answers that could shed some light on the nature of the debate. Despite the overaction, this movie connects to the layman better than the Sanskrit version. I don't know about the technicalities of the movie or whether it is factually correct or whether it is misleading, but i was able to connect and understand why Adi Shankaracharya became so great.
Education and Knowledge brings serenity and compassion to one personality. Adi Sankracharya is a great name... The director and the actor totally unfairly portrayed Sri Sankracharya. Arrogance on both the characters. Even Mandan Mishra was not like that. Director totally missed the point.
They attempted to deliver the concept with good motive but they could not deliver in correct content, We have to encourage with proper inputs to make it better
@@saradabaisaradabai9216 I respect your word. But I wish you should know snow about sankaracharya and the way he has chosen and what he actually fight for. I don't say it is the best one. But atleast he tried to his level to showup the things happened in his life
in this dialogue, i see the following things: 1. that women were as highly educated as men. 2. that even great scholars are prone to ego. 3. that scholarly debates are conducted under strict rules ensuring that the debaters do not lose their cool during the debate and it does not become a shouting match. 4. that the person sitting in the position of judge need not get up even if that person's husband is sitting. (as per the norms of the day, a wife was not expected to remain sitting when her husband had stood up) 5. that once a woman was given the position of the judge, she had to remain impartial no matter what. 6. that the debate was on dwaita-adwaita siddhantam; a very deep concept that could not be understood easily. 7. that all proofs had to be given using logic, reaasoning and solid proofs given in the vedic texts. 8. now, it will appear to be foolish, misleading and demeaning for the prestige of both Mandana Mishra and Adi Shankara. However, all i see is that it is a clash of titans - equally talented and highly learned men. I saw the Sanskrit version of the movie and i couldn't connect much to the scenes at all. the scene where the Chandala opens Asi Shankara's eyes was as bland as the debate scene between Mandana Mishra and Adi Shankara. for a layman, the Telugu vesrion is quite enlightening while the Sanskrit version doesn't tell him much. All i saw in the Sanskrit version was that a debate took place for 17 days. the actual debate was not shown - not even a few questions and answers that could shed some light on the nature of the debate. Despite the overaction, this movie connects to the layman better than the Sanskrit version. I don't know about the technicalities of the movie or whether it is factually correct or whether it is misleading, but i was able to connect and understand why Adi Shankaracharya became so great.
Greatest Insult to Adi Shankara and Mandana Misra (who later on became Sureshwar acharya)...both were the greatest of sages... This is complete nonsense...
in this dialogue, i see the following things: 1. that women were as highly educated as men. 2. that even great scholars are prone to ego. 3. that scholarly debates are conducted under strict rules ensuring that the debaters do not lose their cool during the debate and it does not become a shouting match. 4. that the person sitting in the position of judge need not get up even if that person's husband is sitting. (as per the norms of the day, a wife was not expected to remain sitting when her husband had stood up) 5. that once a woman was given the position of the judge, she had to remain impartial no matter what. 6. that the debate was on dwaita-adwaita siddhantam; a very deep concept that could not be understood easily. 7. that all proofs had to be given using logic, reaasoning and solid proofs given in the vedic texts. 8. now, it will appear to be foolish, misleading and demeaning for the prestige of both Mandana Mishra and Adi Shankara. However, all i see is that it is a clash of titans - equally talented and highly learned men. I saw the Sanskrit version of the movie and i couldn't connect much to the scenes at all. the scene where the Chandala opens Asi Shankara's eyes was as bland as the debate scene between Mandana Mishra and Adi Shankara. for a layman, the Telugu vesrion is quite enlightening while the Sanskrit version doesn't tell him much. All i saw in the Sanskrit version was that a debate took place for 17 days. the actual debate was not shown - not even a few questions and answers that could shed some light on the nature of the debate. Despite the overaction, this movie connects to the layman better than the Sanskrit version. I don't know about the technicalities of the movie or whether it is factually correct or whether it is misleading, but i was able to connect and understand why Adi Shankaracharya became so great.
I heard He is so argumentative and win the arguments . Imagine getting enlightened at the age of 16 in a place where many old ones are Buddhu s . I understand him . He attained samadhi at the age of 32. Which is wow.
moral of this video is it is highly impossible for telugu industry to direct a movie naturally. shankaracharya never shows anger or exaggeration on his face as he is a yogi. this video great insult to shankaracharya and mandara misra too. watch old shankaracharya movie and see the difference. ua-cam.com/video/aiwaoWcGtx8/v-deo.html
खुप महत्वाचा प्रसंग आहे.जर मराठी भाषेत भाषांतरीत करता आला तर पहावा. नम्र विनंती
స్వామియే చరణం అయ్యప్ప🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏 చాలా అద్భుతమైన సీను చూపిస్తున్నారు ప్రతి ఒక్కరూ స్వామి వారిని దర్శించుకోవాలి
Accept ✝️ you evil hindu
నేటి యువతరం ఈ మువీ ఒకసారి చూడాలని కోరుకుంటున్న
లేదంటే మిమల్ని మీరు కోలిపోవచ్చు
PERFECT EDUCATION FOR INTELLIGENT UNMARRIED MEN. YES, I AM IN SEARCH OF THESE ANSWERS STILL NOW. THIS KNOWLEDGE WILL HAVE ONLY WITH THEIR WIFE FOR SOME YEARS. SO MARRIED MEN ONLY CAN ANSWER. NOT BAD. BUT THIS VIDEO IS GOOD
Excellent 🙏
Thanks
Atleast through the movie like this... many people have come to know about the debate which was held ...about Advaita. ,🙏
Kaushik Babu Our Swami Ayyappan 😍🙏(lots of love from Kerala)
ಅದ್ಭುತ ಅತ್ಯದ್ಭುತ 🙏🙏🙏
ఒక గొప్ప వాదాన్నీ, అందులో పాల్గొన్న వారినీ ఇలా హాస్యాస్పదంగా చూపిన ఆ దర్శక, నిర్మాతలకు అసలు కళాభిరుచి కానీ, ఆధ్యాత్మిక విషయాల పై అవగాహన కానీ, హైందవ ధర్మం పట్ల గౌరవం కానీ, లేదనే చెప్పాలి. నటులు చేత కూడా అతి గా నటింపజేశారు.
Neeku undha
in this dialogue, i see the following things:
1. that women were as highly educated as men.
2. that even great scholars are prone to ego.
3. that scholarly debates are conducted under strict rules ensuring that the debaters do not lose their cool during the debate and it does not become a shouting match.
4. that the person sitting in the position of judge need not get up even if that person's husband is sitting. (as per the norms of the day, a wife was not expected to remain sitting when her husband had stood up)
5. that once a woman was given the position of the judge, she had to remain impartial no matter what.
6. that the debate was on dwaita-adwaita siddhantam; a very deep concept that could not be understood easily.
7. that all proofs had to be given using logic, reaasoning and solid proofs given in the vedic texts.
8. now, it will appear to be foolish, misleading and demeaning for the prestige of both Mandana Mishra and Adi Shankara. However, all i see is that it is a clash of titans - equally talented and highly learned men. I saw the Sanskrit version of the movie and i couldn't connect much to the scenes at all. the scene where the Chandala opens Asi Shankara's eyes was as bland as the debate scene between Mandana Mishra and Adi Shankara. for a layman, the Telugu vesrion is quite enlightening while the Sanskrit version doesn't tell him much. All i saw in the Sanskrit version was that a debate took place for 17 days. the actual debate was not shown - not even a few questions and answers that could shed some light on the nature of the debate.
Despite the overaction, this movie connects to the layman better than the Sanskrit version. I don't know about the technicalities of the movie or whether it is factually correct or whether it is misleading, but i was able to connect and understand why Adi Shankaracharya became so great.
మీ
వాళ్ళకి క్షలక్షన్స్ ముఖ్యం.మలయాళ చిత్రం చక్కగా తీశారు.తెలుగులో భ్రష్టు పట్టించారు.
Next movie mere director
After so much search, i got it.adi Shankara who made India and maa bharti ❤️🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
Another Shankaracharya needed to this world
Forget the world in order to restore our dharma the bharat varsha need him desperately🕉🙏 Jai Adi Guru Shankaracharya.
@Sahil ghanta he wasn't manuwadi
జై జగత్ గురువు ఆది శెంకరాచార్యయ నమోస్తు
Kaushik babu has a divine look...
So much difference between languages adi language was Sanskrit, no more telgu,Tamil, kannada, lastly Malayalam. You can't imagine the best of adi shankara. May god Vishnu bless you ai 👍
Nice. 🙏
kamilini mukharji's acting was really super...once watch from 2:43 guys too funny!!!
😄😄 yes
ಅಬ್ಬಾ ಎಂತ ಅದ್ಭುತ ಚಿತ್ರ.
2021 lo chustunna vallu oka like vesukondi.
Great
Bagundhi
Thank you so much 🚗🏡
భక్తి చిత్రాలలో నాకు నచ్చిన చిత్రం🙏🙏
కమలిని ముఖర్జీ acting super
I thank the creators 🙏they projected the both aacharyals and sharadhe 🙏
Jai sankrachraya .A true master of hinduism and our g8est guide to turth.🙏🐄🙇🙇🙇🙇🙇🙇🙇🙇🙇🙇👌
ua-cam.com/video/1rZAlFWlJ2A/v-deo.html
Superb acting saikumar
Thandri kodukulu super ga natinchaaru sirs
We need you again....Dhlarma is dying
@Satyam Singh Great Bro Keep it Up Jai Hind
Adi Shankaracharya vs IPS Agni! Epic!
సీతా movie
Debate between adi shankara n mandana mishra s considered as one of the best debate. Most philosophical points like maha vakyas, vedas and vedantas have been discussed. Especially advaitha philosophy was proved by vedantic texts. In this scene the advaitha philosophy is completely mislead. No point in having the funny conversations and egoistic expressions. And the examples given to prove the advaitha and karma kanda was baseless.
Yes . There is no Subject in Discussion
Perhaps
ua-cam.com/video/1rZAlFWlJ2A/v-deo.html
Q4
Tb
Om namo Narayanaya namah om namah shivaya 🙏🌺🌹🌹🌷🌷🙏
Humbly request to
VOLGA V
pl.dubbed in Hindi so as to able to every
Indian understand.
Best episode.
Sai kumar's acting was fabulous👌👌👏👏👏
⁰
As always
Hare Krishna
E movie okkate kaadu serials kuda alane tayaru ayyayi. Ishtamochinattu teesiparesthunaru movies and serials. Legal ga edana action teesukuntey thappa ilanti dushpracharalani aapalemu 😞
Please Hindi version
సూపర్
Hello
Super debate
ಶ್ರೀ ಜಗದ್ಗುರು ಆದಿಸಂಕರಾಚರ್ಯ ನಮಃ 🙏🙏🙏
Ramayanaparayamem
Please make available it in hindi
Vadi acting entira babu. koushik babu
Malli cinimalu cheyaledu good keep it up
Aham brahmasmi Jai Sri Krishna 🙏🙏🌹🌷
I love this movie 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
Nice sir 👌👌👌👌👌
👌 👌 supar
Super movie block buster
Super 👌👌👌👌👌👌👌👌👌
Best scene in Jagadguru Adishankara
Om nama shivaya🙏
Om shankaracharya 💝💝💝😘😘👏👏
Great movie telugu ❤❤🎉
Only Telugu has such super devotional videos
I am Tamil little bit understanding 🙏🙏🙏🙏
Hare Srinivasa
Hello brother
Waw amazing movie.....
Good
Jai ho
Chalaa bagundhi... Movie lo
Chinnapati Srikanth....
8:08 dailog meaning
Yenta manchi .. Vishayaniki paniki malina artist lu.. I am very sad.. I a shankaracharya cheppu dhulini..
Why Telugu movies do have so aggressiveness in dialogue delivery and background music...? Shankara's dialogue delivery has to be soft because yogis never speak aggressively... I don't understand Telugu. But each dialogue gives me palpitation...!!
Where r u from?
Mms
Z
Hahha becoz they want to raise emotions😂
@@indiantelanganite1933 eaaaaaaaaàaaßßsßsddffghhjk it's ya day a hi
U found that Shankaracharya dialogue was too hard!!
My favourite movie👌super movie
వారిష్టమొచ్చినట్లు చలనచిత్రాన్ని నిర్మించారు. అదో దిక్కుమాలిన సంత.
1980 కాలంలో అద్భుతమైన చలనచిత్రం తీసారు. దానితో పోల్చుకొంటే ఇది చాల అసహ్యకరముగా ఉన్నది.
in this dialogue, i see the following things:
1. that women were as highly educated as men.
2. that even great scholars are prone to ego.
3. that scholarly debates are conducted under strict rules ensuring that the debaters do not lose their cool during the debate and it does not become a shouting match.
4. that the person sitting in the position of judge need not get up even if that person's husband is sitting. (as per the norms of the day, a wife was not expected to remain sitting when her husband had stood up)
5. that once a woman was given the position of the judge, she had to remain impartial no matter what.
6. that the debate was on dwaita-adwaita siddhantam; a very deep concept that could not be understood easily.
7. that all proofs had to be given using logic, reaasoning and solid proofs given in the vedic texts.
8. now, it will appear to be foolish, misleading and demeaning for the prestige of both Mandana Mishra and Adi Shankara. However, all i see is that it is a clash of titans - equally talented and highly learned men. I saw the Sanskrit version of the movie and i couldn't connect much to the scenes at all. the scene where the Chandala opens Asi Shankara's eyes was as bland as the debate scene between Mandana Mishra and Adi Shankara. for a layman, the Telugu vesrion is quite enlightening while the Sanskrit version doesn't tell him much. All i saw in the Sanskrit version was that a debate took place for 17 days. the actual debate was not shown - not even a few questions and answers that could shed some light on the nature of the debate.
Despite the overaction, this movie connects to the layman better than the Sanskrit version. I don't know about the technicalities of the movie or whether it is factually correct or whether it is misleading, but i was able to connect and understand why Adi Shankaracharya became so great.
Ubhayabharathi🙏👌
BRAMANDAM
I want English or Hindi subtitles 🤗
South India makes Movies like Action.
Mandan Mishr was a Brahman just like AdiShankarAcharya.
A Pleasant Shastrarth took place for Days. Thus, A Great Movie in Sanskrit from Kerala in Sanskrit AdiShankarAcharya to be Great.
Do not criticise South Indian movies just because of this movie. The Sanskrit movie on Shankaracharya was made by G.V Iyer who is a South Indian. Stop teasing South Indians. Anyways, did you even understand a single word in this😂
in this dialogue, i see the following things:
1. that women were as highly educated as men.
2. that even great scholars are prone to ego.
3. that scholarly debates are conducted under strict rules ensuring that the debaters do not lose their cool during the debate and it does not become a shouting match.
4. that the person sitting in the position of judge need not get up even if that person's husband is sitting. (as per the norms of the day, a wife was not expected to remain sitting when her husband had stood up)
5. that once a woman was given the position of the judge, she had to remain impartial no matter what.
6. that the debate was on dwaita-adwaita siddhantam; a very deep concept that could not be understood easily.
7. that all proofs had to be given using logic, reaasoning and solid proofs given in the vedic texts.
8. now, it will appear to be foolish, misleading and demeaning for the prestige of both Mandana Mishra and Adi Shankara. However, all i see is that it is a clash of titans - equally talented and highly learned men. I saw the Sanskrit version of the movie and i couldn't connect much to the scenes at all. the scene where the Chandala opens Asi Shankara's eyes was as bland as the debate scene between Mandana Mishra and Adi Shankara. for a layman, the Telugu vesrion is quite enlightening while the Sanskrit version doesn't tell him much. All i saw in the Sanskrit version was that a debate took place for 17 days. the actual debate was not shown - not even a few questions and answers that could shed some light on the nature of the debate.
Despite the overaction, this movie connects to the layman better than the Sanskrit version. I don't know about the technicalities of the movie or whether it is factually correct or whether it is misleading, but i was able to connect and understand why Adi Shankaracharya became so great.
Shankaracharya himself is a south indian
Awosem,ಶಂಕರಾಚಾರ್ಯ ನಮೋ ನಮಹ.
jabardasth vinod
No he is Kaushik babu
Namo Adishankra. Pls do it in English or hindi
Fo such important Adi Shankara film, Please give us English subtitles! Thanks.
How shallow one could get while presenting a story of a devine philosopher
Education and Knowledge brings serenity and compassion to one personality. Adi Sankracharya is a great name... The director and the actor totally unfairly portrayed Sri Sankracharya. Arrogance on both the characters. Even Mandan Mishra was not like that. Director totally missed the point.
Q
క్టక్టఃః కూడా
very true. The director totally missed the devine nature of the great Adi Shankara charya
Not education and knowlege, constant illumination of truth
,
They attempted to deliver the concept with good motive but they could not deliver in correct content, We have to encourage with proper inputs to make it better
amrutham visham manishi nundi ala puduthundhi ,,,,sir
but i love sai kumar acting.....really nice......
Jai shree Ram 🙏🙏
JAGHATH GURU SRI AADISHANKARA CHARYULU 🙏🌹🌺🙏
Wow
what a film ilanty inka raavalani aa devidini korukuntunna.
Super movie Jai bolo Shenkar maharajki jai
Ambala Ajay ji
Reach
is this movie in hindi
Warest movie
attitude is altitude
❤❤❤say ❤❤❤
👌👌👌
జై శ్రీ రామ్
Subtitles would've helped a lot. Cuz i can't understand anything at all
nice
శృతి: స్మృతి: పురాణానామ్ ఆలయం కారుణాలయం నమామి భగవత్ పాద శంకరం లోక శంకరం...
NiThinkumar
This film was good
🆗🆙
but doesn't like this film
It is boring film
Story was
Boring
@@saradabaisaradabai9216 I respect your word. But I wish you should know snow about sankaracharya and the way he has chosen and what he actually fight for. I don't say it is the best one. But atleast he tried to his level to showup the things happened in his life
Still GV Iyer Shankaracharya remains the best bio pic of this great sage.
@Amlesh ... there is no comparision between the 2. G V Iyer's movie is way ahead in every aspect.
We should not compare that with this. That movie is still and will be the greatest one on jagadguru.
@@aravindkumarramachandran6762 appriciated...👍
in this dialogue, i see the following things:
1. that women were as highly educated as men.
2. that even great scholars are prone to ego.
3. that scholarly debates are conducted under strict rules ensuring that the debaters do not lose their cool during the debate and it does not become a shouting match.
4. that the person sitting in the position of judge need not get up even if that person's husband is sitting. (as per the norms of the day, a wife was not expected to remain sitting when her husband had stood up)
5. that once a woman was given the position of the judge, she had to remain impartial no matter what.
6. that the debate was on dwaita-adwaita siddhantam; a very deep concept that could not be understood easily.
7. that all proofs had to be given using logic, reaasoning and solid proofs given in the vedic texts.
8. now, it will appear to be foolish, misleading and demeaning for the prestige of both Mandana Mishra and Adi Shankara. However, all i see is that it is a clash of titans - equally talented and highly learned men. I saw the Sanskrit version of the movie and i couldn't connect much to the scenes at all. the scene where the Chandala opens Asi Shankara's eyes was as bland as the debate scene between Mandana Mishra and Adi Shankara. for a layman, the Telugu vesrion is quite enlightening while the Sanskrit version doesn't tell him much. All i saw in the Sanskrit version was that a debate took place for 17 days. the actual debate was not shown - not even a few questions and answers that could shed some light on the nature of the debate.
Despite the overaction, this movie connects to the layman better than the Sanskrit version. I don't know about the technicalities of the movie or whether it is factually correct or whether it is misleading, but i was able to connect and understand why Adi Shankaracharya became so great.
Okte pettukovacchuga
super
Om Sri Gurudev namah
Excellent
Greatest Insult to Adi Shankara and Mandana Misra (who later on became Sureshwar acharya)...both were the greatest of sages... This is complete nonsense...
i agree with you!
in this dialogue, i see the following things:
1. that women were as highly educated as men.
2. that even great scholars are prone to ego.
3. that scholarly debates are conducted under strict rules ensuring that the debaters do not lose their cool during the debate and it does not become a shouting match.
4. that the person sitting in the position of judge need not get up even if that person's husband is sitting. (as per the norms of the day, a wife was not expected to remain sitting when her husband had stood up)
5. that once a woman was given the position of the judge, she had to remain impartial no matter what.
6. that the debate was on dwaita-adwaita siddhantam; a very deep concept that could not be understood easily.
7. that all proofs had to be given using logic, reaasoning and solid proofs given in the vedic texts.
8. now, it will appear to be foolish, misleading and demeaning for the prestige of both Mandana Mishra and Adi Shankara. However, all i see is that it is a clash of titans - equally talented and highly learned men. I saw the Sanskrit version of the movie and i couldn't connect much to the scenes at all. the scene where the Chandala opens Asi Shankara's eyes was as bland as the debate scene between Mandana Mishra and Adi Shankara. for a layman, the Telugu vesrion is quite enlightening while the Sanskrit version doesn't tell him much. All i saw in the Sanskrit version was that a debate took place for 17 days. the actual debate was not shown - not even a few questions and answers that could shed some light on the nature of the debate.
Despite the overaction, this movie connects to the layman better than the Sanskrit version. I don't know about the technicalities of the movie or whether it is factually correct or whether it is misleading, but i was able to connect and understand why Adi Shankaracharya became so great.
Before mandana Mishra became saint, he believed in memansa. This was nothing but atheism. Mandana Mishra was a great scholar but he an atheist.
@@roshanpatil u
Who told you Mimamsa is Atheism...fool without knowing don't utter nonsense @@1970sugan
Please include Subtitles...Thanks
Aggression not required. He is symbol of peace.
I heard He is so argumentative and win the arguments . Imagine getting enlightened at the age of 16 in a place where many old ones are Buddhu s . I understand him . He attained samadhi at the age of 32. Which is wow.
@@saranya1111_ but this movie is a total exaggeration and slightly misleading, there's a movie by GV Iyer in Sanskrit about shankara
Moral of this video is it is highly difficult and sometimes even impossible for the intelligent persons to win any arguement with fools.
moral of this video is it is highly impossible for telugu industry to direct a movie naturally. shankaracharya never shows anger or exaggeration on his face as he is a yogi. this video great insult to shankaracharya and mandara misra too. watch old shankaracharya movie and see the difference.
ua-cam.com/video/aiwaoWcGtx8/v-deo.html
@@msc3329 you dont know fuck about telugu industry and the amazing mythology movies it has produced.
Wonderful
Supar
Htfui
Ee scene goose bumps 👌👌👌