Biostatistics SUMMARY STEP 1 - The Basics USMLE

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 30 вер 2024
  • ESSENTIAL MATERIALS FOR USMLE STEP 1, 2CK, & 3 JOURNEY
    www.amazon.com....
    Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. There is no additional charge to you.
    * The correlation coefficient (~25 min mark) isn't explained well and I acknowledge this. The main point to get across was the positive (line upwards to right) versus negative (line downward to right) directions. How tightly the dots correlate to the line is not explained in this video. +1 or -1 means the dots are "tightly" speckled on the line. Any number in between (ie. .3, -.2 etc...) and the dots are "loosely scattered". (see 2020 video for clarification)*
    Feel free to email me at randy.neil8@gmail.com for notes or you can go to www.coastalmdl... to download. Good luck on exams!!
    Randy Neil, MD

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,7 тис.

  • @dinowarrior2167
    @dinowarrior2167 3 роки тому +645

    Why am I paying for Harvard's so called experts to teach me! You did more to show me how to set up a problem than my professor who wrote the book on biostats!

    • @RandyNeilMD
      @RandyNeilMD  3 роки тому +165

      Ha... Thanks for the kind words. That's one of the kindest comments I could have gotten. Giggidee...giggidee...alright.

    • @flammo9
      @flammo9 3 роки тому +7

      @@RandyNeilMD Lmao, heh heh, alright

    • @knzay
      @knzay 3 роки тому +59

      lol at this humble brag

    • @musiqal333
      @musiqal333 2 роки тому +7

      @@RandyNeilMD LOL at the QUAGMIRE reference!

    • @Biostatistics
      @Biostatistics 2 роки тому

      😎

  • @DirtyMedicine
    @DirtyMedicine 8 років тому +1733

    Incredible video my friend!! They should just play your videos at each school instead of hiring somebody to teach it worse than you can!

    • @RandyNeilMD
      @RandyNeilMD  8 років тому +202

      UA-cam Medical School....add in Wiki and we can make it a fellowship. Sounds like a plan...ha

    • @mamounmuhand7320
      @mamounmuhand7320 5 років тому +4

      Mush thanks, mush love randy!

    • @aith7rios
      @aith7rios 5 років тому +8

      I was just about to comment this exact thing. My school did a terrible version of this with 1 hr of history and people associated with stats.

    • @rittenbrake1613
      @rittenbrake1613 5 років тому +10

      DirtyUSMLE agree !

    • @theindianpatriotsbharat
      @theindianpatriotsbharat 4 роки тому +5

      @@RandyNeilMD Dear Randy I rarely reply but I must. Some years ago one of my friend learn something. I asked him how as in certain destination it was not available. He replied. UA-cam UNIVERSITY. Today its truly a fact. Some idiots ok lets make it gentle fools do use it for spasms and all sorts of rubbish. Other for such a noble purpose to educate or get educated. I appreciate ur kind effort. As I have just started but feel that I am learning.Thanks agin.

  • @nalennaicker
    @nalennaicker 9 місяців тому +108

    3 years later taking Step 3 now and have come back here every time to watch this video on biostats cause it's honestly the best video out there!

  • @sorayabascoy5838
    @sorayabascoy5838 7 років тому +245

    I usually do not comment on UA-cam videos, but I couldn't resist. I am currently studying for step 1 and I've understood something that had been taking me forever in just half an hour of watching your videos. Heroes don't always wear capes. Thanks so much!!!

    • @RandyNeilMD
      @RandyNeilMD  7 років тому +23

      Thanks for the kind words... too funny. Very glad it was helpful. After you crush STEP1..check back in.

    • @sorayabascoy5838
      @sorayabascoy5838 5 років тому +48

      @@RandyNeilMD Just checking in! Did well on both step 1 and step 2 ck with your help. Currently applying to med/peds and having a pretty successful application cycle!

    • @snekjuce
      @snekjuce 4 роки тому +2

      @@sorayabascoy5838 holy you actually checked back in. dope.

    • @quasimoto106
      @quasimoto106 4 роки тому +1

      @@sorayabascoy5838 so you didnt score that high?

    • @rosyreverie
      @rosyreverie 2 роки тому +4

      @@quasimoto106 med/peds is combined internal medicine and pediatrics and very competitive, so they must have scored pretty high

  • @nashaatnassar5008
    @nashaatnassar5008 3 роки тому +2

    **** At 08:47 nice mnemonic which helped me alot
    the more we go [N] egative(healthy) ------> higher se [N] sitivity -----> higher [N]PV
    the more we go [P] ositive(disease) ------> higher s[P] ecificity -----> higher [P]PV
    **** case-control =======> just say in your head "Case OR Control" to remember that it is related to OR=odd ratio

    • @RandyNeilMD
      @RandyNeilMD  3 роки тому +1

      Nashaat, Thank you for sharing. You should make a video...

  • @Awang333
    @Awang333 5 років тому +439

    26:20 FYI for those still watching this video, there is an error at 26:20! The Pearson correlation coefficient is D -0.2 because the dots are scattered with a "weak negative correlation". Answer choice E -1.0 would have all the dots in a straight line with a "strong negative correlation". Check First Aid 2019 page 263 for more information

    • @doomsdayknight2229
      @doomsdayknight2229 5 років тому +9

      Awang333 thanx man. You got it 👍🏻

    • @JosephReinshagen
      @JosephReinshagen 5 років тому +2

      Thanks!

    • @alirahman8964
      @alirahman8964 5 років тому +24

      excellent error pointed out. i was about to add this. the wider the spread out of points the weaker the number is and it has nothing to do with the slope.

    • @UnknownStar08
      @UnknownStar08 4 роки тому

      @@doomsdayknight2229 can you explain the RR ques 24:24. plzz

    • @KoreanPenda
      @KoreanPenda 4 роки тому +3

      ​@@UnknownStar08 Relative risk is for cohort studies. We know this is a cohort study because we have an outcome of prostate cancer and are looking retrospectively to see whether an exposure had some influence in occurrence of prostate cancer. In this case, the exposure is presence or absence of children.
      With relative risk, you are looking at the risk of something between two groups. Because we are interested in comparing prostate cancer risk in men without children to men with children, we look at the risk of just prostate cancer in men without children (what we are interested in) and then compare to (divide by) prostate cancer in men with children.
      Risk of prostate cancer in men without children: Prostate cancer and no children (80) divided by total men without children (1000)
      Compare it (divided by) by the risk of men with prostate cancer with children.
      Risk of prostate cancer in men with children: Prostate cancer with children (220) divided by men with children (1500)
      So it should look like: Risk of prostate cancer in men without children (80/1000) / (220/1500) Risk of prostate cancer in men with children.

  • @ApplyingForResidency
    @ApplyingForResidency 3 роки тому +147

    I just took my exam yesterday, answered 99% of the questions from this and the part 2 video alone! Can’t thank you enough for making this!

    • @RandyNeilMD
      @RandyNeilMD  3 роки тому +8

      PERFECT!!

    • @maybeokie
      @maybeokie 2 роки тому +8

      where is part 2?

    • @mhdwahoud
      @mhdwahoud 9 місяців тому

      @@maybeokie ua-cam.com/video/VMI9UuNqoGI/v-deo.html

  • @ghazifaisal6594
    @ghazifaisal6594 8 років тому +475

    You are the pathoma guy of statistics.....thanks a lot Dr...your style is magnificent

    • @RandyNeilMD
      @RandyNeilMD  8 років тому +128

      That was perhaps the best compliment I have ever received. Glad videos were helpful

    • @ghazifaisal6594
      @ghazifaisal6594 8 років тому +18

      +Randy Neil, MD......You deserve it.....successful teaching is a talent and you're talented

    • @storylava9603
      @storylava9603 7 років тому +6

      They were helpful man.

    • @RandyNeilMD
      @RandyNeilMD  7 років тому +16

      Thanks. Appreciate it

    • @komalmalik634
      @komalmalik634 7 років тому

      BEST!

  • @kazijennah
    @kazijennah 6 місяців тому +31

    8 years ago , and 8 years later watching it
    Gold will always be Gold

    • @RandyNeilMD
      @RandyNeilMD  5 місяців тому +3

      Works well for insomnia as well... :)). Thank you for the kind words.

  • @Ajs00
    @Ajs00 7 років тому +71

    I passed my nbmes because of your videos. I improved my biostats and epidemiology sections tremendously. It made a difference in me passing or failing. Thank you sir you are great!

    • @RandyNeilMD
      @RandyNeilMD  7 років тому +27

      You have to love it when it all works out perfectly. Glad it was helpful.

  • @ArzooSadiqi
    @ArzooSadiqi 8 років тому +141

    This is one of the best teaching videos I have watched on UA-cam! Thank you so much :)

    • @RandyNeilMD
      @RandyNeilMD  8 років тому +10

      You are the teacher with the million subscribers... So I am humbled. Thanks for the comment

    • @ekimzaga
      @ekimzaga 6 років тому +2

      For biostats, it is the best video hands down :)

  • @dr_geezy
    @dr_geezy Рік тому +2

    is it me or the relative risk formula he used is different than first aid?

  • @fabiolagonzalez3091
    @fabiolagonzalez3091 Рік тому +4

    How many of you are using this video to study for the Step 3 now?👋 Ready to be over with biostatistics lol

    • @RandyNeilMD
      @RandyNeilMD  Рік тому

      C'mon.... you should be saying "bring it"... one of the few sections on exam you can answer with confidence

  • @nawzirilarazan8831
    @nawzirilarazan8831 9 років тому +62

    Seriously? I hope you having a teaching gig somewhere and that they're paying you ALOT of money.

    • @RandyNeilMD
      @RandyNeilMD  8 років тому +12

      I wish...glad it was helpful.

  • @adriencm9025
    @adriencm9025 2 роки тому +7

    Thanks for this awesome video! Question: at timestamp 6:43 wouldn't this study be a retrospective cohort, not a case control? The "exposure" is older age and the researchers started with two groups, exposed and not exposed (older and younger). Then they looked to see the outcome (high or low Step 1 score). Or is this not right? Thanks!

  • @avilashmandal151
    @avilashmandal151 4 роки тому +10

    6:12 We are obtaining the Results(i.e. the outcome/ reality/ disease ) and the Age( exposure/ risk) at the same time so why is this not a cross-sec study? Please explain this Sir. I am so confused now.

    • @lisas.3530
      @lisas.3530 3 роки тому

      I agree I thought this was cross-sectional.

    • @sheenugupta3126
      @sheenugupta3126 3 роки тому

      In cross sectional we just determinate the incidence, like people who have age >50... & people who scored >200.
      We do not establish association.
      Here we are trying to answer the question "is there an association between old age & low scores?"
      Got it??

  • @gaupatel1637
    @gaupatel1637 6 років тому +11

    Dr. Neil is the MAN! Thank you for taking this extremely dry topic and making it easy. I've studied it for step 1 and step 2 and could not bear to do it again for step 3 but his approach has brought much needed relief. Also very impressed with his response to my request for a copy of the notes as he is no doubt busy with residency. Thanks again, doc!

  • @JocoRoco
    @JocoRoco 2 роки тому +2

    At 13:55 , isn't the FN 0 on all A,B & C points? Making sensitivity 100% on all of them ?

  • @brookemasonwilson
    @brookemasonwilson 8 років тому +15

    Thank you for posting your videos! I'm one of those non-traditional student and haven't seen or attempted any stats questions since the mid 90s. I would start sweating as soon as I saw a biostats question on any of my practice blocks. Originally, I would pick an answer and move on to the next question. I've stopped skipping them, and they no longer send into the panic zone. THANK YOU!

  • @akashangya
    @akashangya 11 місяців тому +5

    Having my step1 tomorrow…came back just to rewatch one last time.. thank you very much. ❤️

  • @moserrothchoco
    @moserrothchoco Рік тому +5

    Came here for step 1 and step 2, back for step 3. THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR ALL OF YOUR HELP!!!!!!

  • @CyclingSJH
    @CyclingSJH 7 років тому +11

    Saved, liked, favorited, shared, appreciated... Can't thank you enough, Dr. Neil.

  • @tmandudeguy
    @tmandudeguy 8 років тому +25

    Thank you so much buddy. I don't think you realize how helpful it is to just have someone draw this out with you. Ofcourse its all in FA but having it in context is invaluable. I think someone mentioned it already but I think the only things you're missing is RRR, ARR, NNT and NNH. But they're pretty self explanatory.

    • @RandyNeilMD
      @RandyNeilMD  8 років тому +5

      Glad you found it useful. Good luck on the Step exams...

    • @shawnjonas7622
      @shawnjonas7622 5 років тому +3

      Fucking hate when someone uses the word Buddy!

    • @NIKCANFLY
      @NIKCANFLY 4 роки тому +3

      @@shawnjonas7622 Chill buddy

    • @rafayrizwan6122
      @rafayrizwan6122 4 роки тому

      @@shawnjonas7622 fuck u BUDDYYYYYYY

  • @georgessadek
    @georgessadek 7 років тому +12

    This video (and the accompanying one), is a MUST WATCH for anyone preparing for step 1! Simplified and to the point. Thank you Dr. Neil!

  • @yusufshaikh4942
    @yusufshaikh4942 8 місяців тому +7

    3 months of UW and all I really needed was 20 mins. You're a God Sent savior. God Bless 🙌

    • @RandyNeilMD
      @RandyNeilMD  8 місяців тому +1

      Perfect. That's what the goal is. "There's got to be a better way..."

  • @rameshpant1309
    @rameshpant1309 Рік тому +1

    i think RR ratio calculation at 24.30 has some error.Isnt that a/(a+b)/c/(c+d) would dividing 80/(220+80)/920/(920+1280)=0.57
    plz correct me if i am wrong.....thank u

  • @medically_high3629
    @medically_high3629 6 років тому +5

    i'm half way through the vid.... and mannnn i LOVE u for this... u r the best.. my step 1 is in few days.. and i'm doing my final revisions... and i needed this quick source for tackling the high yield stuff.... i wish u all the best

  • @JooAnnna
    @JooAnnna 3 роки тому +8

    I have been here for my step 1, step 2 CK and now step 3. I hope you realize how much value you add to people's life. Thank you isn't enough.

    • @JooAnnna
      @JooAnnna 3 роки тому +3

      You can show appreciation by letting the adds run guys, Goodluck everyone.

    • @RandyNeilMD
      @RandyNeilMD  3 роки тому +3

      Glad it was helpful. Be sure to take a peek at DRUG AD video for STEP 3...

    • @JooAnnna
      @JooAnnna 3 роки тому

      @@RandyNeilMD I sure will, thanks again.

  • @christyyjbw
    @christyyjbw 2 роки тому +6

    I was here for Step 1, for Step 2, and now again for Step 3. Dr. Neil, you the best

    • @RandyNeilMD
      @RandyNeilMD  2 роки тому +3

      Cristina... Thank you for the kind comment. For step 3, make sure to review DRUG AD video...

  • @baristameme7997
    @baristameme7997 4 місяці тому +2

    Thanks for the video, very helpful. I came here for step 3

  • @37VQV
    @37VQV 4 роки тому +10

    I used this to study for biostats for Step 3, worked perfectly. Day 1 of Step 3 has a decent amount of Biostats, like 4 - 6 q per block, but this video will cover like nintety percent of what youll need

    • @RandyNeilMD
      @RandyNeilMD  4 роки тому

      That's perfection!! Glad to hear it worked well for you.

    • @ashimadogra4523
      @ashimadogra4523 4 роки тому +1

      @@RandyNeilMD I am taking my Step 3 in 2 days. And I have a degree in Biostats from Boston, but I STILL came back to your video for that high yield revision! You're AMAZING.

    • @RandyNeilMD
      @RandyNeilMD  4 роки тому

      @@ashimadogra4523 Thank you for the feedback... CRUSH the STEP 3... Biostats was only on Day 1 from what I recall... pretty much teh same as STEP 1 and 2... Stay focused. Stay confident...

    • @ashimadogra4523
      @ashimadogra4523 4 роки тому

      @@RandyNeilMD Aww thank you so much! You're the best!

  • @danielam6521
    @danielam6521 9 років тому +11

    The best video ever about bio statistics. Thanks Randy

    • @RandyNeilMD
      @RandyNeilMD  9 років тому +2

      +Daniel AM Perfect...do well on exam

  • @makeupjunkie5066
    @makeupjunkie5066 5 років тому +4

    Thank you so much for the video, it's very helpful. But is there a typographical error when calculating the Relative Risk? As far as I understand it, it's (A/the horizontal total)/ (B/horizontal total). The denominator is the sum on the far right side not the sum at the bottom of the punnet square.

    • @lindseyladd9822
      @lindseyladd9822 5 років тому +1

      His table is set up differently. The question is also worded so that it basically asks for the inverse of the relative risk.

  • @ellieok6503
    @ellieok6503 3 роки тому +5

    I can’t thank you enough. Not all heroes wear capes 😭🙏

    • @RandyNeilMD
      @RandyNeilMD  3 роки тому

      Thank you Ellie. Glad it was helpful.

  • @hibahkhan3575
    @hibahkhan3575 7 років тому +27

    I somehow stumbled upon this video by chance, and it was like a gift from God. I kid you not, Dr. Neil's videos for Biostats are a God send for those studying for step 1. His videos helped me understand the First Aid portion better and apply them to Uworld questions. On top of that I emailed him and within a day he was kind enough to send me his one page notes, thank you Dr. Neil!

    • @RandyNeilMD
      @RandyNeilMD  7 років тому +5

      Randy.neil8@gmail.com. Just email me. I'll attach a copy

    • @waltercisneros7498
      @waltercisneros7498 6 років тому

      can i have one please? walcis001@hotmail.com .... thanks in advance

  • @justinhills9125
    @justinhills9125 6 років тому +7

    Dr. Neil's biostatistics review videos are an absolute must-watch for Step 1 studying! These lectures will give you an approach that you can consistently use to answer questions correctly. Forever grateful!

  • @riccikalaya4614
    @riccikalaya4614 3 роки тому +5

    I return to this video annually for step 1, step 2 and now step 3. You are the best!

  • @Diosadelguac
    @Diosadelguac 7 років тому +1

    hey Randy 2017, and this video is still pure gold !!thanks a lot

  • @ganeevsingh5466
    @ganeevsingh5466 2 роки тому +7

    Just went through the whole series having never read Biostats all through medical school and even kept avoiding it for step, I can easily conclude that Dr Randy is a legend.

    • @RandyNeilMD
      @RandyNeilMD  2 роки тому +2

      Ganeev, Appreciate the kind words...

  • @shiv634
    @shiv634 5 років тому +36

    You've cured my biostatistics phobia, eternally grateful.

  • @saeedkarajah9745
    @saeedkarajah9745 2 роки тому +3

    Thank you for the great videos Dr. Neil.
    I think the question at 6:00 is actually a retrospective cohort because the two groups were seperated based on the risk factor (being old or young) not the outcome (high or low score)

    • @sahilkessrani5810
      @sahilkessrani5810 9 місяців тому

      yes it should be cohort if we compare between the low scorer and high scorer and see in them how many are above 50 Yoa and below 50 Yoa than it will be case control

  • @caneishacoburn847
    @caneishacoburn847 Рік тому +2

    Can we get some step 2 and 3 content for biostats too? :)

  • @carolineheres3450
    @carolineheres3450 3 роки тому +4

    taking step in 48 hours and this just saved my life

  • @kyleessex6301
    @kyleessex6301 2 місяці тому +1

    As I am studying for level 2, I'm realizing that this simple chart would've gotten me so many questions on y first boards. Better late than never. Also the cOhOrt double O has a Relative Risk a Double R, if anyone else could use that connection.

  • @dianadelvalle161
    @dianadelvalle161 3 роки тому +3

    OMG, my brain just clicked. Thank you so much! This was amazing!

  • @sarahblankson-arthur1375
    @sarahblankson-arthur1375 4 місяці тому +1

    About the 4th question, can someone, @Randy Neil or anyone who can help answer why it isn't a cross sectional study? because the question is comparing two groups of students (older and younger) at a single point in time (when they took the exam), and checking their USMLE Step 1 scores. The data is collected simultaneously from both groups, and there is no follow-up or longitudinal component. where as I thought a
    Case-Control Study Compares individuals with a specific condition (cases) to those without the condition (controls), often to identify risk factors or associations.

  • @indiramassie6237
    @indiramassie6237 5 років тому +3

    You are amazing!!!!!!!!!! May God bless you and your family 🙌🏾🙌🏾😊😊

  • @elisebatzli239
    @elisebatzli239 Рік тому +1

    Why. Just why?? It's almost painful how long it took me to try to teach this to myself with UWORLD . . . THANK YOU SO MUCH!

    • @RandyNeilMD
      @RandyNeilMD  Рік тому

      Glad it saved you some time and frustration...

  • @dvshrai
    @dvshrai 7 років тому +4

    I don't know how somebody can dislike this video. Phenomenal explanation. I leared this and passed step 1, and CK.
    Now at the time of step 3, found your video and it became so easy.
    I would really appreciate if you could make a video describing step 3 specific content.

    • @RandyNeilMD
      @RandyNeilMD  7 років тому +4

      Thanks for the kind words... Step3 only has biostats on day1. I'd say it roughly the same concepts but they have multiple drug ads which are hard to study for... if you know the basic concepts you will do well.

  • @0000010jimmy
    @0000010jimmy 7 років тому +2

    Hi Neil I am a big fan of your videos and they are nothing short of brilliant. Just for your info on the odds ration question when you right out the top numbers you wrote 60/20 when it was 60/200 even though you picked the right answer on the options. just wanted to mention that. Thank you anyway

  • @suhaabu-shamla9800
    @suhaabu-shamla9800 3 роки тому +4

    What such a masterpiece is this !!
    thank you so much .

  • @wardoc1705
    @wardoc1705 11 місяців тому +1

    Thankyou for your help sir. After watching these lectures i am confidently able to solve Uworld questions. Would want to know which lectures do you suggest for someone preparing for Usmle Step 2?

    • @RandyNeilMD
      @RandyNeilMD  11 місяців тому

      For BIOSTATS it never changes.

  • @JudetteD
    @JudetteD 3 роки тому +3

    why staying hours in my class to struggle to understand what you make me understand in *30 minutes* ?
    Man, GOD BLESS YOU!!!
    this video should go around the world for saving millions of students lives!!! TKU!!!

    • @RandyNeilMD
      @RandyNeilMD  3 роки тому

      Thank you for taking time to comment and give feedback.

  • @sageezbaid
    @sageezbaid 4 роки тому +1

    Really useful video thank you, honestly lectures at university are so wack I learnt more stats in this vid with real examples than 3- hours of lectures

  • @jasonliao7658
    @jasonliao7658 7 років тому +101

    Error at 26:20: R (correlation coeffficient) is measure of linearity not slope. Correct answer should be D (-0.20), not E (-1.0)

    • @umaumz9270
      @umaumz9270 7 років тому +1

      Can you please clarify the answer please, as to why it is -1.0. Thank you in advance.

    • @kylebarner681
      @kylebarner681 7 років тому +18

      I agree with this. The correlation coefficient should be how close the dots are to the line...not the slope of the line.

    • @DOC_951
      @DOC_951 7 років тому +5

      I agree, a -1.0 would be a perfectly straight line with the dots, which clearly his example didnt have that distribution

    • @wakeguy205
      @wakeguy205 7 років тому +1

      Yea, this is incorrect. Closeness (of r) to 1/-1 is how well the line fits, NOT slope. Additionally, the way you calculate ARR (in the next vid) is different than what first aid says.

    • @SaSpursFan
      @SaSpursFan 7 років тому +4

      i came to comment this

  • @miguelleon3041
    @miguelleon3041 5 років тому +4

    Mr Neil, first I’ll like to thank you for your time and dedication to create a very easy to understand video like this one. I’ll like to ask you what would make a difference among case control and retrospective cohort on minute 6:47, thanks again!

    • @arnav25magic
      @arnav25magic 4 роки тому +3

      I had that same question too. I think it's a retrospective cohort study because the study is comparing a younger age group with an older age group (age is clearly a risk factor and the "disease" or outcome is higher or lower marks), so even though the table is arranged that way, I still think it isn't a control study because as per the question stem, you aren't STARTING with the outcome i.e. you aren't comparing a group who scored higher on the step 1, against a group who scored lower.

    • @Bruno-ms7zj
      @Bruno-ms7zj 4 роки тому +1

      ​@@arnav25magic I think the same. I guess he just got it wrong due to the different table arrangement

  • @salvadorbl2-188
    @salvadorbl2-188 5 років тому +14

    Taking Step 1 tomorrow! This is the last video I will be watching! Thank you Dr Neil! The Pathoma of biostats!!

    • @salvadorbl2-188
      @salvadorbl2-188 3 роки тому +1

      @Jacob Giles Sorry it took so long to reply. I did well! I'm just now starting residency

  • @jimmysegovia146
    @jimmysegovia146 5 років тому +1

    There is an error on 8:14....another easier way of solving writing odds ratio is A*D/B*C or (40*200)/(60*160)...or answer A.

  • @ghazan123
    @ghazan123 7 років тому +4

    these videos are lifesavers . anybody weak in biostatistics MUST do them . thank you so much. emailed him for the notes and he replied so quickly with them . thank you so much again

  • @teamhope525
    @teamhope525 3 роки тому +1

    U are Amazing Doc. Cant thank u enough. GoD Bless u !!. Have got CK in few days, had given up on biostats. Found u then :)

  • @andrewcarey283
    @andrewcarey283 7 років тому +6

    This is all very high yield for the purposes of examinations.

    • @RandyNeilMD
      @RandyNeilMD  7 років тому +1

      Appreciate the feedback

    • @andrewcarey283
      @andrewcarey283 7 років тому +7

      Just took Step 1 last week and your videos covered EVERY SINGLE biostats question on my exam. Thanks very much.

  • @alexisguadarrama3447
    @alexisguadarrama3447 3 роки тому +1

    Seriously I couldn't find any way to understand about the Ho and H1 and now I know it perfectly! Thank you very much for this videos, I will have my step 1 in may 12! im an IMG

    • @RandyNeilMD
      @RandyNeilMD  3 роки тому

      Glad it was helpful. Keep studying HARD!! Home stretch.

  • @trentjohnson9407
    @trentjohnson9407 6 років тому +3

    this is an amazing video! I understand things a lot more because of your quick associations. It'd be great if you could post a pdf of the examples. Thanks a lot

  • @maryamsalah4723
    @maryamsalah4723 2 роки тому +1

    Greetings from Canada, I failed my mcq exam I will try again and I'm sure your videos will help ,thanks

  • @tafwolf
    @tafwolf 5 років тому +4

    Hands down the best review for biostat and epidemiology for USMLE. Short, sweet and to the point. Thank you so much for helping us all out. Learned way more in 30 minutes than hours of lectures at med school

  • @martinmartins7412
    @martinmartins7412 6 років тому +1

    Boy o boy! The proof of the pudding is in the eating.Thanks for efforts you have put to study this.

  • @wadelsheilh7220
    @wadelsheilh7220 7 років тому +4

    well i can say this is the best biostatistics video I've ever seen
    its PERFECT
    Good Job and i really appreciate ur efforts

  • @arshadmalik3335
    @arshadmalik3335 6 років тому +2

    Thank you very much Dr.Randy for your time .very nice and helpful videos. very clear concept. I also got my notes from you. you are really very good person. 5 stars for videos.

  • @gamerguy765
    @gamerguy765 7 років тому +3

    Math is so much easier to understand when someone walks through the problems with you. This vid has been shared throughout our class as the quick stats review. thank you very much.

    • @RandyNeilMD
      @RandyNeilMD  7 років тому

      Glad it was helpful...go crush the STEP

  • @williamjebril5552
    @williamjebril5552 6 років тому +2

    Just received the notes... will be interesting to see what I can accomplish with it.. I will return for a review. Thanks! Videos are great!

  • @adoctorskitchen7105
    @adoctorskitchen7105 6 років тому +4

    You are amazing......magically amazing

  • @rachael4775
    @rachael4775 6 місяців тому +2

    i'm going into this blind and did the questions before the explanations. I would've gotten these ALL wrong hahahah. You made it all make sense and I'm so grateful!! I'm actually excited for biostats to come up on my exam now which is insane

    • @RandyNeilMD
      @RandyNeilMD  6 місяців тому

      Perfect! It's all about getting better....

  • @spicymocha9517
    @spicymocha9517 6 років тому +3

    13:40 would A and B also be 100% sensitivity?

  • @stevenbean09
    @stevenbean09 2 роки тому +1

    Alas, I'm back for my third board exam. This video has been tried and true through med school, and I am depending on it now in residency as my biostats knowledge is absolutely nothing at this point.

  • @trietdo2144
    @trietdo2144 4 роки тому +3

    one of the best reviews of biostats for step 1; quick, efficient, and to the point. thank you!!

  • @nirakib6744
    @nirakib6744 6 років тому +3

    these videos are soooo goood and to the point. i even recommended them to some test takers.You are helping out many examinee God bless you.

  • @MEEDOFOX
    @MEEDOFOX 6 років тому +2

    best biostat USMLE video ever. everything is clear and easy. thank you very much. you just made my life easier.

  • @Diosadelguac
    @Diosadelguac 6 років тому +4

    Thanks randy

  • @dr.hanaat2811
    @dr.hanaat2811 3 роки тому +1

    Raaaaaaaaaaaaaaaandy omg I'm so confused now cuz question of correlation at 26:41 minute you answered in another video -0.20 not -1 ???
    why do you change the answer ??

    • @RandyNeilMD
      @RandyNeilMD  3 роки тому +2

      It wrong in this video... My main point was to teach the slope, but the "dots" tightness to the line determine whether it's a 1 or close to 0. It's better explained in newer video.

  • @ryankelly8077
    @ryankelly8077 5 років тому +3

    This is the best stats vid I’ve seen on UA-cam for med school students

  • @afsarkaisor9256
    @afsarkaisor9256 2 роки тому +2

    Thank You very very much Sir. Biostatistics was a scary subject to me. You made it so simple & easy.

  • @offlineaccount9974
    @offlineaccount9974 5 років тому +7

    2019 and still using the Lectures. Thanks a Lot Doctor Neil.

  • @Annu-h2m5x
    @Annu-h2m5x 3 роки тому +1

    Oh my goodness. You explained it so well and precise. Thank you so much. Im a pharmacy student

    • @RandyNeilMD
      @RandyNeilMD  3 роки тому

      Madhurima, Thank you for commenting. Glad it was helpful.

  • @thuyvyle9556
    @thuyvyle9556 9 років тому +3

    You made it sound so easy! Thank you!!

    • @RandyNeilMD
      @RandyNeilMD  9 років тому +2

      Perfect...good luck with test

  • @phylliskimani7626
    @phylliskimani7626 3 роки тому +2

    I don't even know anything about biostats, but even I learned something from this video. Great work! Makes me want to change my major to stats

    • @RandyNeilMD
      @RandyNeilMD  3 роки тому

      Nice... Thanks for commenting Phyllis

  • @es3259
    @es3259 6 років тому +3

    Sir you should be called Pathoma of Biostats haha , awesome job !

  • @11fannyr
    @11fannyr 3 роки тому +2

    Thank you for making my life easy and my study plan feasible!!!!

  • @tonnikask
    @tonnikask 4 роки тому +1

    Wow. You are really good with understanding maths. I doubt if you are a doctor..looks like you are some maths guy 🤘

    • @RandyNeilMD
      @RandyNeilMD  4 роки тому

      Nah... just a Psychiatry guy who thought there had to be a better way... Glad it was helpful.

  • @yashpawate1306
    @yashpawate1306 2 роки тому +1

    My exam is a month away and Im freaking out coz I get every stats question wrong. I hope this would be all that is tested!

  • @fatimaqamar3359
    @fatimaqamar3359 6 років тому +2

    I am grateful to a random screenshot of a random post about biostat on fb where a guy recommended you. Cant thank you enough for making difficult concepts stick so easily. God bless you! And the way you have possibly responded to hundreds of people with your notes, I really appreciate it. :) I couldn't help but utter a prayer for you. Stay blessed.

  • @paulawad9585
    @paulawad9585 6 років тому +2

    super high yield. great idea to actually work us through the problems as u explain. 10/10 explanation. not to mention, easy personality to follow along :) 10/10 video. believe me if i could press LOVE on this video i would. thank u so so so so so much great doctor!!! :)

  • @kelminak2992
    @kelminak2992 Рік тому +2

    It's not even fair what I'm about to do to the bell curve on my COMLEX 3 tomorrow. I feel like I just experienced a personal Matrix kung-fu training montage. Thanks so much for this. I cannot believe how easy that box is to make at the beginning, and I brute-forced it all on the previous exams. All I had to do was draw the lines going each way and what they mean! Wild. Thanks so much for this and I hope this graces many med students (or interns) in the future. I will tell everyone I know this exists.

    • @RandyNeilMD
      @RandyNeilMD  Рік тому +1

      Confidence is half the battle. CRUSH IT!!!

  • @abunaommy
    @abunaommy 3 роки тому +1

    😭😭😭😭😭😭😭 Thank you so much. I can’t believe this gold is FREE

  • @dr.poornaprajna
    @dr.poornaprajna 11 місяців тому +2

    These videos would never get old! WAY WAYYYY ahead of time!
    Thank you so much :)
    Step 1 in 2 months...

    • @RandyNeilMD
      @RandyNeilMD  11 місяців тому +1

      STAY FOCUSED! STAY CONFIDENT!! Keep me posted on how the exam goes...

  • @annieversary89
    @annieversary89 2 роки тому +2

    Dr. Neil, you are a lifesaver - your amazing content made biostatistics easy to understand for both Step 1 and 2CK. I can't thank you enough

    • @RandyNeilMD
      @RandyNeilMD  2 роки тому +1

      Glad videos are helpful. I would have also went with something outside of 0.05... I like your train of thought.

  • @nangsanhtilarseng7141
    @nangsanhtilarseng7141 6 років тому +2

    Wonderful videos for Step 1 Statistics review. Thank you, Dr. Neil!

  • @simbaperrymatoi1318
    @simbaperrymatoi1318 4 роки тому +1

    You sir, are a lifesaver . These videos just made a topic i dislike (so much so that i always used to skip most Qs on Qbanks) super easy.

  • @jp32123
    @jp32123 3 роки тому +1

    finished all the meat and potatoes for step 2 CK and left epi for last, here i am back here again to freshen up on epi before the exam! ur a life saver! btw u kinda talk like Jeff Bezos! haha

    • @RandyNeilMD
      @RandyNeilMD  3 роки тому +1

      I'll take it as a compliment... CRUSH STEP 2...!!!

  • @MrVolcomclassic
    @MrVolcomclassic 4 роки тому +1

    Nothing more irritating than UA-cam ads on a educational video. Very distracting.

  • @studyaccount4724
    @studyaccount4724 4 роки тому +1

    Hello Dr. Neil, the question about older students and test scores, why can't it be cross sectional instead of case control