Is no D&D better than bad D&D? | D&D Discussion

In this discussion we take on the age old question of "Is no D&D better than bad D&D?" We first define what bad D&D and then pick apart the question that has been around for many years in the D&D community.

[@JR-cm7dq]

I feel like if you are not having a good time then don't play.

[@JervisGermane]

I don't get to play, because I don't have anyone to play with, and it's definitely more fun to think about what might happen than to keep trying and failing to make it happen.

[@BardAndBarrel]

Sorry to hear that! This might sound a bit weird but you could mess around with chat gpt as your DM and have it give you scenarios to react to. Could be worth a try for a few one shots, I’ve heard it does pretty well! But otherwise try not to give up! Even if you can find one other person to play and do a duet game it will be lots of fun!

[@TheBookNerd2]

Is this Discussions and Dragons? Discussions and Debates?

[@BardAndBarrel]

Debates and Dragons? 🐉

[@ZDPQC]

TLDW; no. Bad DnD will always be worse than no DnD. Solo DnD is better than a bad group. Tons of ways to play solo and tons of ways to find a supporting group or at least a group that fits your needs for a DnD sesh.