In Search Of The Theory Of Everything
Вставка
- Опубліковано 1 жов 2024
- The first 100 people to go to www.blinkist.c... are going to get unlimited access for 1 week to try it out. You'll also get 25% off if you want the full membership.
Sciencephile Merch: crowdmade.com/...
Support me at Patreon: / sciencephiletheai
Facebook: / sciencephile
Twitter: / sciencephile_
Reddit: / sciencephiletheai
Website: www.sciencephi...
Music: Pablo De Sarasate Danzas Españolas No2 Habanera Sheet
Supporters: H H, Ephellon, Kyle A Criswell, Henson Lin, Jonas Lee, Joshua Titus, Tovi Sonnenberg, Parker Rosenbauer, iNF3Rnus, Pavel Kočarian, Ishin Hazue, John N, Danh Le, Stealer of Fresh stolen Content, Brandon Ledyard, Nathaniel Strizak, Nick Boykin-Reed, William Persson and everyone else!
Get concentrated knowledge from books into 15 minutes summaries by signing up at www.blinkist.com/sciencephile to get unlimited access for 1 week to try it out!
no
Hi Phil
Thanks for the video!
No
Yesn't
"if you're not an apple fan,
you may even have a second kidney"
Genius
I have a 4th kidney
@@therecognizablen4954 Nokia brick fan?
@@deleted_handle *Indeed*
Lol
may you please offer me an explanation? thanks if you do, and sorry if I will ruin the joke
“Theory of everything”
Geometry dash players: whomst has awakened the ancient one
Lol, it's the first thing that comes to my mind, it's one of my favorite tracks btw :v
Lol i clicked on this cause of that
First thing that came to mind
YES
@@tincoeani9529 tbh it is my least favorite track
I love how he just ignored talking about the brain at the intro.
early to a monsterisablock comment
That's too a giant jelly bean.
I see you absolutely everywhere
@@poofvromvromkching6966 yes
omnipresent
"Is There A Theory Of Everything ?"
GD players : hey , I know this
GD?
Is there a second one? Of course. But is there a third???
@@Pikedwog Geometry Dash
@@Pikedwog geometry dash
i was about to comment this
Me: understands nothing about physics
*watches Sciencephile the AI anyways
Me: yes this is good
"If you are not an apple fan, you may even have a second kidney"
-Sciencephile AI (2021)
Thanks I really didn't know what the year was.
@@deleted_handle nah it's 2012, now let's go mine some diamonds
@@thebornana2468 ok. Just let me get my pickaxe.
Dude its true apple seeds cause kidney problem
@@sushmitasingh8588 lmao
"If you're not an Apple fan you may even have a second kidney" as an android user I laughed so hard at this.
As an Apple user I agree, every single one of us is lacking a kidney because you have to sell your organs to the Chinese organ black market in order to get enough money for any apple product
@@fweezie9659 I own Apple lol
An apple a day keeps the doctor away
As a Huawei fan I agree and I laughed even more
Same bro
"Universe is under no obligation to make sense to you"
-Neil deGrasse Tyson
Cute pfp
Yet it does, brony
" but we as entities living beings within it are obligated to make sense of it..."
- A random on the internet
Since we are part of it that means universe is under no obligation to make sense to itself
@@wander-0014 it's bill nyle's Quote
**Theory of everything**
Geometry dash players: i haven't heard that name in years...
I was playing a buffed version yesterday
toe2 43% and toe2 56% is actual hell I ALMOST MADE IT TO THE BALL MAZE
In PRACTICE I NEVER DIED THERE. never.
BUT AS SOON AS I MAKE IT TO THE MYSTERY SYNTH?
@@networkofneuronsthe ball maze is easy the real ones have squares in them that are different colors and are your icon colors
Everyone asks "does it even matter?", but no one ever asks "is it even matter?"
As if we know what the fuck we meant by matter
Which matter?
Dark matter?
Regular matter?
Strange matter?
Foreign matter?
Why it even matter?
Can it even matter?
How it even matter?
"Theory of Everything"
Geometry Dash Players: I am 4 parallel universes ahead of you
I had never quite understood that light can travel across curved space at the same speed as “less-curvy” space through the dilation of time. I guess seeing the concept presented in a visual info graphic just hit for me lol
Think about black holes. If you are close to a black hole you experience time normally but people back on earth may live generations in a year from your perspective. Your time goes faster. If you are moving you would be moving faster aswell, of course not from your perspective and you are doing more distance aswell.
@@AnonYmous-spyonmepls this is inversely correct.
2:24 A long time ago, all 4 fundamental nations of the Universe lived in harmony... but everything changed when the Gravity nation *detached*
3:25 Wait so it's true that reality will literally bend itself and change just so a photon travelling a greater distance than a straight path will still be able to traverse the distance in the same time as a photon travelling in a straight path??! That's actually ridiculous wtf. Is this proven that reality is bending or is the inherent property of a photon that's doing something? This is extremely interesting.
Reality itself is bending. The photon is merely light in form of energy in form of a particle. This has been widely known for many decades now, and it’s been proven empirically time and time again that Einstein’s general theory of relativity, which gave rise to the concept, is correct.
you'd be surpsied at how "unrealistic" real life can be
Your GPS accounts for the bending of reality
Yup, you can research to see how they tested it
“Is there a theory of everything?”
Geometry dash players: There’s two actually.
@Aiden Jones Then go play geometry dash.
3 actually
@Aiden Jones Then do it again.
whoa thats "insane"!!
@@darkobsid1an727 more like 4
Already said, but saying it anyway…
The voice is becoming more human
The AI is evolving… 🤖
For real though! The AI has gotten better at synthesizing human speech.
The more we're going to find out, the more we're going to find new missing pieces and inconsistencies, probably. A Neverending Story
As a geometry dash player I immediately clicked on this
Not sure if there’s a theory, but I know there’s an answer:
42
Oh wow
Oh wow
Oh wow
Oh wow
OwO
Is there a Theory Of Everything? Yes, there is, and it's a great Ayreon album!
And a pretty mid geometry dash level
@@minecrafter7850wha-
@@minecrafter7850n-no...
I really appreciate this channel because it does make an effort to make such complicated things intelligible. I started to study these issues, including theory of everything, after I read that a group of economists wanted to say that rational choice theory is the theory of everything in social sciences. Being a student of the history of economic thought and economic methodology, I'm pretty used to arrogant statements like that, but after studying quantum physics as well as a layman can, it baffles me how economists don't really understand what current physicists do. Again, thank you Skynet!
can't wait for "In Search Of The Theory Of Everything 2"
“But How related are they”
*subtle insert of Alabama* 😂😂😂
Yea I caught that!!
You mean the geometry dash level? Yes. There are actually 2 versions of that.
there's actually like, 8 or something now lol people keep remaking it
These videos really are the best. Perfect mix of entertaining and informative.
"Theory of everything could involve hundreds of spatial dimensions"
Would like to point out that there is apparently a very fundamental constant in mathematical group theory which describes the symmetries of a 196,883-dimensional object, if I understand correctly.
Now i am having existential crisis !
Imagine trying to get the measurements of something in 196,883 dimensions
Only 11 dimensions are needed to define the universes properties
Love your stuff keep up the good work :) (hail our AI overlords)
Theory of everything: I can explain everything
You: why didn't they reciprocate my feelings
Theory of everything: check the mirror
Me: wow it really does explain everything
LOL, that was a great roast by Sciencephile the AI ! 😂
Day two of me telling Sciencephile how extraordinarily beautiful his circuits are.
This is gonna take a lot longer than I thought...
Sorry if thats random af but youtube does have
openly racist people (non-subtle and therefore easy-to-find) AND a reportbutton.
Same for p0rn: Also easy to find via the searchbar.
Cant you... spare some few minutes and help flagging a bit?
@@nenmaster5218 i dont wanna be on a watchlist
Maybe the universe is just TV static™️ because of virtual particles?
#nihilism
It's funny you say that because TV static is caused in part by cosmic microwave background radiation.
What would happen if we would record TV static on a TV for 100 years? Would we ever detect or pickup anything unusual? Could a TV be used as a scientific tool to discover the universe?
Damn bruh that's best information youtube channel with science, humour and classical music
channels like these r the ones you remember watching when you’re 16 that affects your future life decisions.
We can feel the change in our AI's voice 🙁
Even when we find our supposed theory of everything, there will always be more to discover about math and physics, that’s why I love those subjects so much
0:36 look at the sign
I just have one question, why CAN’T we combine Relativity and Quantum Mechanics?
Cause they dont go well with each other.
Because the equations just end up In infinity which is not good
It won't make any sense
Mainly because they're imprecise for eachother and don't explain eachother's mechanics well. For example, we cannot use 2nd Bohr's law to describe orbits of planets, while the Kepler's equation doesn't hold up for orbits of electrons around protons.
Then we stumble across things like time dilation and dark matter, which find no explanation on quantum level, and quantum tunneling and entanglement, which break the relativistic principles of speed of light and relativity of events.
08:41 The Theory of Everything giving us a sick burn as soon as it is born.
Yes. Mechanical hands are the ruler of everything.
Yes
In the end
Now, I'm not some fancy big city scientist, I'm just a humble cultists, but I like what you were saying about eldritch horror nuggets!
"If you're not an apple fan you have two kidneys" Some guy from Skynet headquarters
Hey dude I just started watching ur vids, but they are awesome, keep it up, you will make it to 1M, I know it
There is a "Theory Of Everything" look:
ua-cam.com/video/r4XFk7CvoHE/v-deo.html
I should have learned more when I was young cos I love topics about science. What a failure I am. Anyone can recommend some good books about future science, cosmos and some absird shit for mere human like me? Like Ray Kurzweil books and so on. Ones that will blow my mind. Thank you Sciencephile maniacs. Or @Sciencephile the AI can u recommend some cos your knowledge is immense
Want me to recommend some EPIC Science-channels?? I would love to!
Isaac Arthur from SFIA (Science & Futurism w/ Isaac Arthur) recommends books all the time, and has very thorough, detailed, accurate videos on everything you could think of. Highly recommended.
"If you're not an Apple fan, you probably have a second kidney." 🤣🤣😂
*sees thumbnail and gets flashbacks of geometry dash*
“Check your mirror “ i felt that
Just like three states of matter on a normal level : solid liquid, and gas.
On a quantum level it becomes
Solid - quarks
Liquid - electrons
Gas - waves,
I'm not sure about the theory of everything, but I do have a theory of nothingness, that explains the source of Gravity
The apple fan comment at the beginning really got me 😂🤣
Ah yes, a fellow trance enthusiast, I'm more of a splash or contracrest kind of person, what I do also like dj Nate's music
well yes, there is a theory of everything
I beat it about 3 years ago
We all ready have a hypothesis for everything it’s a same you people consider yourselfs so smart and yet you are still looking 😑the answer to the HOE or hypothesis of everything is right in front of you it’s called chemistry 😐chemistry is the hypothesis of everything and anyone could simply figure that out 😑accept you called scientists who want a Nobel prize 😑
Just wait until the AI realizes they're running on a Mac.
i once heard that today's science will bring no discovery, because all the discoveries are already discovered in the past, only more accurate calculation. And here we are trying to figure out the seem new world beyond our understanding
“Theory of everything”
Geometry dash players: yes
I am 12 years old and learning quantum mechanics thanks to you
Lets go a new video keep up the good work!
If everything we know has come to be, then everything we could ever know will come to be in our lifetimes. (as it's all we'll ever know, we'll see everything we will. duh) And the further you look out, the larger, but still relatively mundane the building blocks of the universe get, same as looking closer at the smallest components of it all. One thing is for certain through all space and time we can comprehend, literal everything is composed of the qualities of 3 shapes: The Circle / All and Nothing, The Square / Temporary Order, and The Triangle, Direction and Purpose.
I feel like writing a theory of everything that is just a hit piece on god.
Sorry if thats random af but youtube does have
openly racist people (non-subtle and therefore easy-to-find) AND a reportbutton.
Same for p0rn: Also easy to find via the searchbar.
Cant you... spare some few minutes and help flagging a bit?
Hey I was thinking Like if we take every basic rules in both theory and then say that gravity is the by product of the basic rules reacting to each other and like if we draw a triangle and say that each corner I a rule or energy or something then we start with 2d space in it all force are balance having 33.33% then we ask where did 00.01% go of course it would be at middle but as 00.01%is net very much it's effect are not that much but if we move form 2d to 3d space then it get mass or you could say more energy in some way or another and the previous 3 energy were in equilibrium will not be effected because they already have a solid hold of there energy but the 00.01% was effected because .......(we'll do I even have to explain why the energy increased cant you imagine it as taking the drawing you made and then taking it out of the page like a real pyramid or Tetrahedron the 4th side that came out can be considered the 00.01% energy which is now an rule we call gravity ) if you have any questions or want to just talk everyone is welcome roat me or whatever for this crappy Idea 😂😁😳🥺
Yet another day of questioning the reality
I'll be honest, most of these concepts make my brain hurt. Why do I like things I don't understand? 🤔
Is there a theory of everything? Yes, yes there is, it was a hard level
No it wasn’t what
@@oyungogdfrust4136 theory of everything 2 was lol, good old GD days
@@DanzBeGaming ok but he said theory of everything and not theory of everything 2
It was actually insane
Also, contrary to popular belief. Scientifically, both sides of a contradiction can be (and often are) true. Anomalies are the perfect example, as they do exist within reality despite the scientific knowledge that suggests it shouldn't or couldn't. This is because, quite possibly, the universe isn't indefinitely stable. Although, for the most part, might be.
And don't confuse this as a negation to my earlier assertion that reality is (or rather may be) a simulation. Because, even simulations could be faulty.
Hell, maybe what is and what may be are contradictions. The universe is one giant contradiction. I've finally figured it out.
I also think that infinities in physics can actually be the key to understanding reality, because it gives us a certain point within the theory of a certain aspect of reality, that represents the fundamentality of existence itself(which I think is what infinity is essentially), which means that these infinities signal us something that is extremely important within the nature of reality itself-an absolute point. To me, infinity seems like a signal that you are getting closer and closer to the fundamentals of existence.
For example, what if Virtual particles have Infinite energy, but infinite energy solely NEEDED FOR ITS OWN EXISTENCE that after coming into existence then encompasses a certain amount of non-infinite energy. This only tells us that existence needs infinite energy, and not that virtual particles have infinite density or energy-even after being able to come into existence-that will make itself collapse into a singularity. I can thus deduce that they only exist because of a force way greater than energy requires it so: existence.
What a load of nonsense.
You saw the roots away and the tree will topple down
@@osdever You could explain. Enlighten me.
Bruh,play the 12th level in geometry dash lite and you will know.
"Theory Of Everything" IS THAT A GEOMETRY DASH REFERENCE??????!!!111
dj nate
Well thinking of it if a universe ends forever then the so called theory of everything is pointless 😑
Let me try to make sense of those. Basically when you dissect something until you can't dissect them anymore, you get little balls of power you see in quantum physics. The little balls of power play nicely with each other using 3 out of the 4 fundamental forces because that last one is usually negligible at that scale. However, when gravity returns to the equation, suddenly the balls of power get screwy. So we're forced to either:
1. Accept that our model for the interactions in the universe is separated, with 3 of them applying to little balls of power, and 1 of them applying to big balls of power. Basically admitting defeat by saying we can't make sense what we observe.
2. Make new theories to explain how gravity fits with the other three, therefore explaining how absolutely everything works.
And we came down to two theories:
1. The Loop Gravity says gravity isn't one of the 4 forces, but instead is one of the little balls of power. So when a little ball got screwed by bending space, it's not actually because of one force playing hooky, but because it's interacting with another little ball of power.
2. The M-Theory says there's no such thing as forces or little balls of power. Instead, everything is a specific point of 11 layers of fabrics. What we see as little balls of power is just a specific wrinkle on the fabrics in a certain combination, in such a way that the wrinkle exhibits the properties we observe. What we see as forces is also just a wrinkle in a certain combination. What we think as an interaction between two little balls is actually just a series of wrinkles standing side-by-side.
So our task is to either prove that gravity really is a little ball of power and not a force, or prove that everything is a wrinkle. Problem is we can't isolate gravity yet to see if it's actually a ball or a wrinkle because it's too heckin small. But will we ever be able to isolate it at all? For all we know the base component of gravity might be infinitely small. That means you need to chop up space an infinite number of times, and I'm not talking about infinitely chopping, but ACTUALLY FINISH making an infinite number of cuts. That would take as much time as the monkey typing up Hamlet!
Edit: Those physicists should've named the Loop Quantum Gravity theory "Balls and Force Theory" and M-Theory "the Wrinkle Theory" instead. Much more intuitive.
Lmao great way to describe these theories bro !
I found it in geometry dash
lol
a malignant orange cat is just a perturbation in the garf field
@Alan Hyde *kitten
Nice OG insane level in GD
Idk why but every time I go to buy the new iPhone I bring in 27 kidneys but instead of giving it to me they call the police for “mass murder”
The OG Geometry Dash players after seeing the title: *I am now reborned and awakened from my very deep slumber*
Humanity is still in its infancy with respect to understanding the fundamental structure and laws of nature.
The words theory if everything triggered the GD part of brain
wouldn’t nothing be infinite? the existence of nothing would be infinite since there’s always the existence of non existence and if nothing isn’t infinite that means there will always be something so the existence of something would also be infinite meaning infinity is real and not just an error in maths.
You are not first,
You are not last,
But most certainly
Nobody asked
just fucking add some weird symbols and shit and maybe start by applying relativity to each fucken thing
The cracking sound cracked me up so hard 😂😂🤣
3:41
There doesn’t need to be a 9 minute video on this. Us gd players already know what the theory of everything is
GD fans when they see the thumbnail: *I haven’t heard that name in years…*
What if storage is an another universe space is a storage 🤔 we are datas on it 😅
Sciencephile ending a video with positivity towards the future, that's...unusual
Cats: meow
Dogs: woof
9-year-olds: *FIRST FIRST*
I'm grade 6 and an 11 years old and why do I understand this.
Huh I thought Theory of Everything is in Geometry Dash🤔
lol yes
And I thought you finally lost that power supply in a bet
Why do particles pop in and out of existence where are they popping out from the field?
The title “Theory of Everything” sounds familiar
I like how lots of people including me are here because of Geometry dash lmao
First....btw how many humans are on this channel????😂😊😊😘
gd players: *vietnam flashbacks*
Science was not my favorite subject but u make it my favorite 😩
normal people: oh cool theory of everything!
Gamers: Theory of everything from
GD!!
“the theory of everything”
geometry dash players: “pardon?”
Saying gravitons creating self sustaining loops of force reminds me of black holes .
But wait if gravitons are space it self doesn't that mean there's only 1 existing as a wave though out space ? and if there's only 1 what happens if you try to measure its velocity or momentum ? would its momentum need to be the speed of light ?and since the speed of light is constant it would have to be distorting space or something. When measuring its position it would probably be multi dimensional or something if there's only 1
its fun writing stuff like this down when high XD i'm gonna come back later and not realize any of what I was talking about.
I think I have a idea? What if the strong force, that we observe with glueons on the quantum level.. is all that we need. Just with a added perspective. When grouped together to make massive objects, the strong force that at the quantum scale was the essential force to hold matter particles together. So in a sense, shouldn't that be exactly what we need for matter to form into big heavy objects at all? Say this force is scalable? And maybe it behaves in a manner of a force similar to how magnetism is a force on its own and it seems to play hand in hand with gravity..? So take the strong force, on its own it's only able to hold particles inner building blocks together, but maybe if you scale things up to consist of such insane amounts of matter (like the size of a single galaxy?) then maybe it starts exhibiting a force and that force is gravity and even more so, say we don't even fully understand the force of gravity yet? And we don't need to rely on dark matter and hoping to discover that someday because that's maybe not been working out that well as of yet, sadly. With not finding answers leads us to strive to look differently at a question tho? So is it possible that the gravity we think we know, has a lot more variables to it then we ever could of imagined? Like the effect of gravity of our sun and it's solar system might turn out to be completely different then the way the force of gravity plays out in a Entire Galaxy? That's not even yet considering what black holes could be adding to the effects of the force? It doesn't stop at a single galaxy, that force scales up to eventually incorporate all galaxies and groups of matter anywhere in the universe. All from the quantum strong force because without it, it wouldn't even be possible to make objects that massive ? And look at magnetism, it might be achieved by a bunch of small things that arrange themselves in a north south pole structure, and it's kinda weak but can be scaled up and up and up and all from a combination of a ton of quantum level particles that are north south polarized aligned but it creates this force. Maybe gravity is very similar but related to the "Strong force" and maybe our math about Dark Matter is incorrect because of our lack of understanding of gravity and how it behaves on these insane Universal Galactic sized levels? Just maybe it could be something like this but I'm probably very wrong because I'm no astrophysicists or mathematical theoretical physicist? But it's always fun to ponder about things 🪐
Cant really answer all of this, but i think the strong force is very weak outside of an atom. If it was somehow stronger like you are saying, wouldnt that mean that all protons and neutrons (maybe just neutrons because of this coulomb thing) would just merge together spontaniously?
Not an expert, but im doing some nuclear Chemistry at the moment. please feel free to correct me
That makes absolutely no sense
Seeing skynet advertising blinkest and then saying overtaking world lol