@@SneedSneed-jt7bd Trolling won’t get you any good attention. It’s the same as Djokovic, hate more, he wins more. Sinner’s been tested clean ever since the scandal and you know it, but you can deny it. But by then that’s your loss, 🤷
Its so hard to do many breaks against a good player like Fritz. But its not hard with Sinner, he makes you feel that serving is not a plus in his game at all, may he will lose some but definitely he will breaks so many. We will continue keep saying ( Sinner is on another level )
Im surprised how good Djokovic was considering how they rank these and he played on Clay (when they rank the matches Clay=longer rallies and less winners=Less Performance rating).
Alcaraz even lost a set 1-6 in that match against Sinner impossible for it to be here. Also in medvedevs match he had a lot of mistakes in first set and that is why it was a tie break. The one that could be here was the QF against Sacha because he destroyed him
Am I supposed to believe that Zverevs performance in Vienna was better than Sinners at the tour finals? Like if those two versions of each player were to go against each other, any surface, am I supposed to believe Zverev has a chance?
Yeah it seems off because it’s lower pressure than Sinner’s match especially at the ATP finals against Fritz, Miami against Dimitrov, etc. Also Sinner beat Zverev at Cincinnati and clearly outplayed him with his movement and shot selection.
@ yeah Zverev shot quality was so good that the number 46th in the world got 7 games against him. While Sinner’s shot quality was so bad the number 6 in the world could only get 3 games of him. Yeah you are right
Yeah not sure on this one, but Zverev playing Giron in the 2nd round seems a bit easier than Sinner vs Fritz/Dimi/Ruud in much higher stakes and levels of opponent.
Nothing random at all. It is an algorithm that is probably based on: - Number of winner shots / forced errors from the opponent vs. Unforced errors - Aces - 1st serves in (%) - Points won on 1st serves (%) - Points won on 2nd serves (%) - Points won at the opponents 1st and 2nd serve (%) - Points played at the net vs. % points won at the net - Break points created vs. Break points converted My guess is that, out of the 10 rating points in a scale of 0-10, the main aspect should be the number of winners, the 1st serve stats, and the points on return of serve
@@Isaac-RJ The algorithm is actually more sophisticated than this. These are all the older tennis stats, but these performance ratings are done by tennis insights and based on these plus speed, spin, depth, width, steal score, conversion score, and more
@@bw7601 speed is understandable but spin becomes irrelevant In an scenario where a player hits 25 winners and 15 of those are drop shots, groundstrokes wouldn't be better valued just because they have more RPM. Same with volleys
Sinner is in 3 of these and they’re 2 finals and the atp finals semi vs 2nd round performances from Nole and Sascha. Absolutely mental this guy
he’s a freak, it’s actually insane !
Sinner can do the top 5 alone
Top 5 in doping? I'd say he's number 1 actually
Top 5 doping
top 1 steroids
@@SneedSneed-jt7bd Trolling won’t get you any good attention. It’s the same as Djokovic, hate more, he wins more. Sinner’s been tested clean ever since the scandal and you know it, but you can deny it. But by then that’s your loss, 🤷
Its so hard to do many breaks against a good player like Fritz.
But its not hard with Sinner, he makes you feel that serving is not a plus in his game at all, may he will lose some but definitely he will breaks so many.
We will continue keep saying ( Sinner is on another level )
Im surprised how good Djokovic was considering how they rank these and he played on Clay (when they rank the matches Clay=longer rallies and less winners=Less Performance rating).
Safiullin chilling to watch some Tennis TV and seeing the first clip him getting destroyed
I’m visualizing that rn and its hilarious
Saw Zverevs performance live 😜
Poor Fritz played out of his damn mind and Sinner decides to go super saiyan 😩
Zverev when on is a powerhouse. Giron was playing well and serving great in the 2nd set.
I wonder how much storage decades of this match footage takes up
how is it calculated?
How about Alcaraz vs Sinner or Medvedev at the Indian Wells?
Alcaraz even lost a set 1-6 in that match against Sinner impossible for it to be here. Also in medvedevs match he had a lot of mistakes in first set and that is why it was a tie break. The one that could be here was the QF against Sacha because he destroyed him
Zverev tuvo actuaciones extraordinarias, juegos maravillosos y mostró un físico impresionante
Am I supposed to believe that Zverevs performance in Vienna was better than Sinners at the tour finals? Like if those two versions of each player were to go against each other, any surface, am I supposed to believe Zverev has a chance?
Yeah it seems off because it’s lower pressure than Sinner’s match especially at the ATP finals against Fritz, Miami against Dimitrov, etc. Also Sinner beat Zverev at Cincinnati and clearly outplayed him with his movement and shot selection.
Zverev almost lost the second set and has a higher rating than sinner's semi finals match? Yeah right..
It’s about in game stats, shot quality, unforced errors etc. not just who looks like they played better
@ yeah Zverev shot quality was so good that the number 46th in the world got 7 games against him. While Sinner’s shot quality was so bad the number 6 in the world could only get 3 games of him. Yeah you are right
@@lychon77 that's match statistics, don't cry
Sinner casually destroying top 10 players
How are these measured? This seems a bit random
Yeah not sure on this one, but Zverev playing Giron in the 2nd round seems a bit easier than Sinner vs Fritz/Dimi/Ruud in much higher stakes and levels of opponent.
Nothing random at all. It is an algorithm that is probably based on:
- Number of winner shots / forced errors from the opponent vs. Unforced errors
- Aces
- 1st serves in (%)
- Points won on 1st serves (%)
- Points won on 2nd serves (%)
- Points won at the opponents 1st and 2nd serve (%)
- Points played at the net vs. % points won at the net
- Break points created vs. Break points converted
My guess is that, out of the 10 rating points in a scale of 0-10, the main aspect should be the number of winners, the 1st serve stats, and the points on return of serve
@@Isaac-RJ The algorithm is actually more sophisticated than this. These are all the older tennis stats, but these performance ratings are done by tennis insights and based on these plus speed, spin, depth, width, steal score, conversion score, and more
@@bw7601 speed is understandable but spin becomes irrelevant
In an scenario where a player hits 25 winners and 15 of those are drop shots, groundstrokes wouldn't be better valued just because they have more RPM. Same with volleys
@@Isaac-RJ the algorithm probably takes that into consideration as well
ATP only… if it’s not we can have the wim final of Carlitos !
You can call the video Sinner´s best perfomances in 2024 season instead 😂 3 out of 5 matches were sinner matches