I Want to Thank You For The Videos You Put Out. You are different from others. You Stay Neutral. I THANK YOU FOR THAT!! Your Videos Help The Public Really See How and What Really Happens. Not Edited To Show One Side! Keep Up The Good Work My Friend!!!
1:35 that "unintelligible" word the judge used was *_uncontroverted._* So the full question he asked was "Did you hear the *_uncontroverted_* testimony of this officer?" The word essentially means _undisputed._
If thos ever does ever get a retrial,, all the lady has to say is at most its just open comgtainer charge they can not prove dui as already shown by the officers lies and deceit
Hey man I had a bad experience here in Florida with law enforcement. The Civil Rights Lawyer suggested in his comments you maybe could tell me what to do now that I have the BWC footage.
It shows how much the "system" is actually stacked against "the people"..... especially how they took this judge off criminal cases...(not playing by the rules they want him to?)
because the prosecutor argued professionally and it's literally her job to argue her case. when citizens argue and get belligerent it only disrupts the courtroom proceedings.
In part, I understand her position. She is arguing for the state and both sides, defense and prosecution should be robust. That's not to say there isn't the interest of justice to consider. Two things: 1) She did have alcohol and was drinking it. This at the very least is an open container violation. Wrong charge, but a violation nonetheless. 2) The officer should have been charged with perjury because he willfully lied under oath. An uncorrupted justice system should have tackled both. That said, misconduct should come out favorably to a defendant, which is why several legal doctrines are in place to go that route. My real issue here is that the prosecutor refused to hold the cop accountable, and that is the bigger problem here. Cops are so rarely charged with the crimes they commit while on the job and we won't see things turn around unless that changes. Look at the deputy from LL's last video who wasn't charged with what appears to be multiple felonies. If that's not a sign of a corrupt justice system, nothing is.
State’s Attys, DAs, and mayors campaign on being tough on crime. The public accepts stats, arrests and convictions, as evidence that their elected officials are being tough. If you need convictions to put food on the table, things like this happen. It’s not a justice system it’s a stats system.
I think the actual root of the problem is the tendency with americans having to "win' at all cost. Even if they KNOW their client is litteraly a murdrer a lawyer will be ADMIRED for making so their MURDERER CLIENT THAT THEY KNOW IS A MURDERER gets away free. Same thing with guilty verdicts. They get ADMIRED for prosecuting as many people as possible, innocent or not. Sometimes they even LITTERALY get money for every person they send in jail.
"Yes, your honor. The DUI citation was illegal. However, the DMV suspends licenses based on what the police and/or prosecutors office tells them. It's not our fault that this one cop's lie snowballed into this woman's license being wrongfully revoked but once her license **had** been wrongfully revoked she became responsible for all the consequences to herself that proceeded from the wrongful suspension of her license. She should rot in jail as punishment for this cop's perjury!"
@@randybugger3006 it's funny because you ignore an unlawful command from an officer and anything that follows as a result of that is basicly thrown out due to the unlawfulness of it. You can use force in self defense and cant be convicted of assault or battery because it was found justified. Just because an act breaks a law doesnt make what led up to it not matter, in fact it matters a lot, especially in more serious cases like murder since that's why theres different degrees of murder. So the fact the prosecutor is trying to go down that road is ridiculous and she should have just gave it up and not wasted tax payer money on this farce. At worst this is a case of the defendant being slightly over the limit for DUI, at best the defendant was completely legally able to drive so the fact the prosecution was willing to die on that hill just to try and uphold a flimsy DUI charge is astounding she wasnt even just trying to uphold the driving suspended charge she wanted it all to stick, she just refuses to lose and will not accept anything but a guilty quite clearly and her judgement is severely lacking and the fact shes in charge of trying to convict people is scary.
It's nuts how the prosecutor backs up the perjury of the officer. I've always said the biggest criminals in the courtroom are sitting at the prosecutor's table.
A resident shot and killed a police officer that entered his home, and our prosecutor entered and searched the mans home. I didn't think that was a prosecutors job.
@@SteveBurman-t1k from the National Conference of State Legislatures: Qualified immunity is generally available if the law a government official violated isn't “clearly established.” If qualified immunity applies, money damages aren't available even if a constitutional violation has occurred.
That prosecutor is the worst! This is why our justice system is so dismal. Trying to get her locked up based on false pretenses to ruin her life just so she can win.
What Florida got extortion red light cameras up everywhere man 🤔 if a cop see you run a red light they're going to take it the person that's driving the car not the register owner and that's what those red light cameras are doing ticketing the register owner of a vehicle if they're going to put red light cameras up like that it needs to take a picture of the driver to hold that person accountable not the register owner of the vehicle 🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔
Absolutely fucking not. I agree with this judges feelings completely, but he broke legal procedures to enforce those feelings. Tyranny is tyranny wether or not we agree with the bias, and this judge is a tyrant who was rightfully removed because of his inability to do his job properly. The cop should be fired under the same reasoning.
She was so annoying, in addition to being an habitual liar on behalf of the State to try to defame this innocent woman. Totally unprofessional behavior, she's lucky she wasn't officially censured for this outrageous performance.
It's great, the judge was able to catch the mistake before it grew exponentially. Prosecutor seems to be on some agenda of her own... in face of fact (false evidence, police officer admitting driver was never properly tested for DUI, licenses suspended wrongfully) she continues arguing... while contradicting herself... He admitted he didn't do proper testing and filled out the DUI form himself... prosecutor refuses to press a perjury charge... but wants to pursue driving with wrongfully suspended license. She refuses to press charges against the officer for perjury, saying "He admitted he was wrong." But still insists on pursuing driving under wrongfully suspended license (Indication is she is trying to weaponize the DUI charges). 2:02 Prosecutor, "You can not summarily dismiss." In face of falsified evidence. 1:43 "DMV is in charge of suspending licensing..." based on falsified test results, by the officer who admitted it was not done properly. 2:29 Prosecutor actually contradicts herself... "He admitted he was wrong." and won't follow up with perjury charges, now she is claiming "He didn't lie." The only avenue left is whether to charge the cop for perjury, which she already declined. She states she is going to appeal (incredulous). She would make a great judge... in a Kangaroo court.
Judges who don't cover up police crimes are only of value if they remain professional. If they choose, instead, to act like an impudent juvenile, void of professional conduct, then they become worthless.
@triciak: nahhhh, what LACKLUSTER didn't show you is that at 1st he convicted her, altho ... 1.) Cop didn't do breathlyzer 2.) Cop didn't do sobriety tests BIG MISTAKE LADY admitting u had alcohol. Hopefully she learned ADMIT NOTHING, not even 1-2 drinks. Say "i invoke/stand on my 5th Amendt of US Constitutn
What set the judge off is the prosecution’s refusal to charge the police officer with perjury. It could even be plead to misconduct, but even the judge like most citizens are fed up with police officers not being held accountable.
@@ChristopherJones-lt3le Sure they can. Judges can get up and strip naked while a trial is in session. Courts of Appeal rectify that stuff, but judges have literally gone off the rails and defendants have had to abide by some crazy stuff before they were relieved by a COA.
@brendanmcmahon1162 The Judge could have required the officer, under oath the to show the documents that she was legally tested for alcohol by a certified agent for her BAC!! Perjury would have been next on the officers list of lies!!
The prosecutions "evidence" was that the defendant drank alcohol. That's not illegal. The presence of alcohol in this bloodstream isnt illegal _unless_ it's in excess of the legal limit. Which can only be determined beyond a reasonable doubt by a BAC test. A BAC test the officer filled out in absence of an actual test. That's not ticking the wrong box. That's filling out a fake blood alcohol content number and ticking the box. Cut and dry perjury on an official record. And how tf did the defence not pick up on this? You can bet if a citizen had committed perjury on an official record that prosecutor would be out for blood. She's obviously corrupt and needs to be officially investigated.
I remember that video. The prosecutor was admitting she wasn't going to prosecute the cop for perjury. No shock there. But too bad the judge DIDN'T throw her in jail for failing to do her job The prosecutor's lucky she didn't get thrown in jail for contempt of court for arguing with the judge I love this judge.
If the judge did that, he would have been dragged or disbarred. The judiciary and state are not separate, they know each other. Judges talk and schmooze with prosecuters while acting like their decisions are fully rational. Don't let the Civic 101 lessons fool you into thinking judges are above being friendly with the police.
"contempt of court" For doing her job? I love how people like you let your inner tyrants show when it suits you, despite virtue signaling against them constantly.
@@gotgunpowder For talking over the judge REPEATEDLY. You are allowed to make your case. You are allowed to speak passionately. You are NOT allowed to disrespect the judge and his court.
I’m an Air Force veteran and I’ve had to sigh and fill out plenty of official documents. There is no such thing as “making a mistake” on an official document. Especially when that “mistake” leads to a life changing outcome.
It amazes me how certain folk could give a rats ass about assisting and playing a role of purposely screwing up someone's life. Most will ask, how do they live with themselves?!? Not realizing that these types adjust and purposely keep the company of others like themselves, just to refrain from feeling a way about their behavior by avoiding the company of those that don't accept and are ok with such behavior.
@@junglekutz5625 some people just receive great joy in making others miserable. If you want to ruin someone’s life, get paid to do it, and for the most part receive no backlash for it, become a cop. Most of the time a person being accused of a crime is innocent but because going to trial is a long drawn out and extremely expensive process you’ll be told that pleading guilty is your best option. Becoming a cop should require a college degree and one year of on the job training with another year of probation. Nobody am learn the job of a cop in 3 months.
The cop claims it's a "mistake" only when he gets caught lying on a sworn document. If we do something like that, we'll likely be in court trying to stay out of jail and/or keep our bank account somewhat whole.
Given the fact that the prosecution knows the reason why her license was suspended and still wanted to continue to charge her, is just fucking amazing.
No its cool that a cop lied on paperwork because some witnesses after the fact and her own testimony proves she drank and drove. Despite the whole premise being that she was above the legal limit for BAC, not that she had an open container in her vehicle. I mean that'd be a whole DIFFERENT charge and case though.
If the policeman was caught lying, he should be fired because his testimony will never be held worth a darn again. Once a liar is always questioned from then on and never believed. .
@@JohnDoe-qz1ql No, he was removed because after acquitting her, he later approved a retrial. That's double-jeopardy. The judge violated her constitutional rights. He was advocating for her in the beginning, but as soon as he changed his mind, he fucked up BIG TIME. If he had let his ruling stand, he would have been an awesome judge, but he didn't. He defended one of her rights while trampling another. You can't do that.
He shouldn't have rescinded his acquittal, the defense was absolutely right to call that out as double jeopardy. He weakened his standing with his peers by getting wishy-washy.
Nah they removed him because he acquitted her and then made an order for retrial after the fact, which made no sense. His attitude was also a concern but if you listen to that stupid prosecutor she was right up there in that nonsense. The system is flawed that's for damn sure.
Where is the tv stations to do an exclusive on these people and chase them to their cars for answers, That judge was as honest and honourable a man for standing up against them doing a wrong on this woman. Shame on the prosecution.
The one thing I absolutely hate about prosecutor is they literally have basically no information to go off but their job is to paint you as the worse possible person regardless of if you did or didn’t do something. It’s genuinely sad.
Not exactly. Good prosecutors will have a good judgement of what should and should not be pursued. Bad ones simply listen to the cops assuming that they are always right and honest.
@@trumplostlol3007 Yeah but that’s also like saying most cops will act in good faith🤷🏽♂️ I want to say I do like cops. I believe their jobs are necessary, I just don’t believe in humans.
@@Datboykeke Unfortunately, many of the cops are poorly educated and poorly trained. They have a toxic police culture from those older poorly educated and poorly trained police officers. You don't need 100% or 50% of bad cops to mess up our justice system. You only need 10% or even 5% of bad cops to put citizens in danger. It is just like our society. You don't need 50% of criminals. You only need 5% of criminals. How many of these cops are potential criminals? Currently, it is hard to get rid of bad cops because of the system. Bad cops end up circulating WITHIN the system. They move from county to county or state to state even after they are dismissed a couple of times.
It's absolutely disgusting that the prosecutor is trying so hard to justify what the cop did AFTER the cop admitted to lying. The worst part is that they removed this outstanding judge so that justice doesn't prevail again. We the people need to do something about this.
Nobody in the justice system is allowed to be good. All they want are corrupt liars so that they can milk as much money as possible out of law abiding citizens. The fact that this woman was arguing this hard to convict this woman after the cops lied, shows what government is all about. convicting people regardless of guilt/innocence.
He doesn't prescribe to other people's fragile egos. And doesn't appear to sink to their level either. Gotta give to the man, he has some good principles.
Anybody else notice how quick they were to remove a judge who has a sense of justice? This is our legal system at work here. The good cops and good judges walk on eggshells while the bad ones get every form of protection under the sun. Absolutely disgusting.
@@JuanLopezCortes That’s the problem with this country right now. Liberals have insane, absurd authoritarian ideals they try and force onto everyone. Republicans have rampant corruption and keep old, outdated laws in place regardless of it it defies logic to do so. Both of these parties and their fighting has turned this country into a cess-pit of degeneracy and insanity. There needs to be a new political party, one catered around the people in the middle, as it’s obvious these parties aren’t worthy of the people of this country.
He wasn’t being a good judge, though. He let his sense of right and wrong get in the way of procedure. He could have followed the proper procedure and still ruled the same way. As he admitted, he got too emotional, presumably over the injustice being perpetrated by the DA’s office.
@@burke615hard to not get emotional when she’s defending a crime. I think the judge is right, anyone could get mad arguing with such an annoying brick wall
And because she defended his lie just to win her case, she will also never prosecute his perjury. This conflict of interest is why the cop felt safe to lie on his report! Corruption at its finest.
I’m insanely surprised the judge didn’t hold the prosecutor in contempt Edit: Also… now that I think about it, how is this not a Brady violation? The cop who arrested her for the DUI admitted under oath he falsified evidence that she was drunk when he pulled her over. The Judge is the one who caught that in the case file for her DUI, not the defendant’s lawyers which means they probably didn’t have the file. If that’s the case then the prosecutor isn’t just in contempt of court, but she’s openly violating Brady V Maryland by not providing the case file to the defendant’s lawyers which proves she shouldn’t have been convicted in the first place.
Yes and the officers mistake done by a civilian would have resulted in arrest, the prosecutor is trying to pad her convection rate for political reasons scarcest kind of attorney
I can't believe how she just kept trying to talk over him. A JUDGE, no less. And she's squawking back at him like he's on of her kids. He's telling her to charge him with perjury and she's flat out refusing.
She was correct that the judge should not rule on a motion until both sides have stated their case. The judge’s righteous indignation got him a little off track there. His heart was in the right place, but you still have to follow the law, which includes letting the non-movant have their say.
@Brian Clark she was supposed to drop the charge of driving on a suspended license as she knew of the exculpatory evidence of the license being wrongfully suspended. Choosing to charge and prosecute after having exculpatory evidence is a crime. She committed the legal malpractice and the federal felonies of malicious prosecution and deprivation of rights under the color of law.
@@EAMitch None of that excuses the fact that the judge didn't let her present her argument on the motion at hand. There are rules in law, and it is important they be followed. Everything you said is a case for the state bar's ethics board and/or further proceedings, not for that moment in the courtroom.
A mistake is forgetting a person name or something equally as trivial, putting a person in jail and taking their ability to travel based on a lie is criminal. The lawyer is a joke!!!
The officer lied, yet instead of backing down and pressing charges of against the officer. The prosecutor runs to his defence! That prosecutor 100% what is wrong with the justice system!
The prosecutor did exactly what she was supposed to do. Get a convintion by any means necessary. Why would they remove her? They probably gave her a raise
The disgusting part is that the cop was never charged for perjury, yet the judge who, while he lost his temper, was doing the right thing and got punished for it.
It's not a mistake when you knowingly choose to check a box on a legal document for something you knew didn't happen. There's no halfassing when ppls lives and rights are at stake
I teach. I was taught that the ABSENCE report was a legal document whereby I was swearing that those students were in / absent from my class at the time it was recorded. A public school absence record.
@@andrewlayton9760 I worked temp jobs for a while. Sometimes we had to record our own time. The time sheets are legal documents and falsifying them constitutes fraud. For a part time temp job.
@@EAMitch That seems to be the part nobody talks about: every single person on that jury needs to be investigated. How on earth they were able to vote "guilty" when the entire cop's testimony was based on perjury is mind blowing.
how can it be perjury when it was a misstate between two similar cases of what that I could understand the prosecutor is saying, but still, that is like malpractice she should be able to sue them?
@@Trip_Ts The officer perjured himself by stating she failed the dui test on the paperwork. The paperwork was then admitted into evidence but the officer in his sworn testimony stated he actually did not complete the dui test (as there was no-one at the station that could do so). The fact the officer stated that she had taken the test and failed it (on the paperwork) is where the perjury comes in. Malpractice comes in if they can prove that the prosecutor knew that the test was not done and yet still entered the documents in as if the test had been done. That was case A Case B was when the woman was stopped 2 weeks later on a suspended license. The license was suspended due to the actions in case A. I am not sure if case A had been adjudicated fully by the time case B was in court.
Everyone portrays defense lawyers as scumbags. It's prosecutors who are criminals. She knew the officer lied and all subsequent charges were void but she still kept pressing the issue! Have to get those conviction numbers!
@Uh Ok Criminal attorneys are not there to get the guilty off. They are there to protect the accused individual rights. If that means the defense attorney finds procedural errors, lies in an LEO's claims, or perhaps constitutional issues with search, then so be it. Cops lie with impunity. Someone needs to guard against official abuse. Lord knows prosecutors don't.
@@Frank_inSA no, it’s absolutely not the prosecutors job to find the truth. That’s up to the judge or jury. All prosecutors do is represent their sides legal position. Attorneys represent the defendants position and prosecutors represent the victims position. It’s their job to do the best they can at representing their clients position, not to find the truth.
The judge wasnt punished for the way he treated the prosecutor. He was punished for taking it upon himself to grant a new trial even though no one filed a request for a new trial.
@@johnn6740 He was also removed from criminal cases because he gave a directed verdict that acquitted the defendant. The "machine" had one less victim to financially rape. Can't have that!
The judge is not above the law. There are court procedures that must be followed. And a judge should not get too personal with the prosecutor or the defense attorney.
I went against a prosecutor like that. All the evidence showed I was innocent and the officers stories had super holes in it. Instead of letting justice prevail she wanted to argue with the judge trying her best to get me convicted. Even having all the details that I was innocent. Judge told her that she would be ashamed of herself.
They only care about stats to send you to prison so they can move up in their career. Prosecutors do not care about the truth, they are worse than defense attorneys
Neither did I. this must be very the first time in history. So the cop lie... prosecutor -"providing false info under the oath is not lying your honor! And I will NOT let you speak the L word today! >:(
To be fair here - he made a mistake. One which is at the core of the criminal law, which is kinda disqualifying in itself. In my mind the joa was fair on grounds of false evidence by the police, BUT he cannot aquitt somebody and open a trial on the same charge again. That was stupid - and maybe it was him istting in his chamber thinking about how it would have been handeled better - BUT and that is the point he di not have the foresight nor the evenhandedness in the moment to think his actions through all the way, which is for a judge bad. His actions as a human are awsome, if evidence has been tempered with, it must be thrown out, if that evidenec is all the state has, the case needs to be thrown out, however his rash descisions to act only upon that one piece of evidence rather the whole (like the procecution said: statement of the driver themself that they dranks omething), made his decision and him volnurable to backlash. If he'd said joa fuill stop it would have been fine If he's said we're throwing out the police statement, and with that we go to trial and in that trial made a deciison taht would have been fine also. But he violated 2 principles as a judge a) don't trial a person for the same thing twice b) be evenhanded and levelheaded don't let your anger (which is understandable in this case) get to your ability to make decisions.
@@blakehansen5434 Actually I would say the first on the list are cops as seen by this case. The cop clearly lied. The prosecutor clearly defends the cop's crime.
@@alberich3099 wouldn’t you think the prosecution is getting the drivers statement that they had consumed alcohol, and the other signs leading the Leo to believe the driver was impaired came from statements made by the LEO on the incident/arrest report already shown to be falsified. If the officer lied about the the driver testing over the legal blood alcohol content limit then how could anything else on the report be viewed as credible. Also how was there nobody qualified to test the driver at the time of arrest, what qualifications are needed to have someone blow into a tube, it’s not as if a medical professional is required. Even if the driver did state they had “drank something” that doesn’t prove, or even suggest they were over the legal limit to operate a motor vehicle.
@@CockyBalboa Your coment is totaly beside the point of what the judge did. You can argue all day long if the case should never have been brought to court - but it did. And the judge acted humanly but stupidly with respect to the law. But for the sake of argument. A) you could make the argument that the case should not have gone to court, but it did and with that the judge must act accordingly to the law and the rules of the BAR B) alcoholtesting not beeing done is a failour ont the prosecution - that however doesn't affact the mistake the judge made. He could have pointed that out, saying "any eyewitness of impairment doesn'T rise to the level to convict therefore the carges beeing dropped" but he didn't c) Admitting to have drunken something while driving is always going to be taken against you, even with beeing under the legal limit, if you then have eyewitnesses you saw you impaired (as with A)) you have a real hard case - admitting is stupid if you want fo fight i. So in short, while nice your comment is absolutly besides the point I raised.
The judge violated the rules legal proceedings to enforce his personal feelings. Just like the cop did. Why do you support the judge, but not the cop? They both lied on official documentation to do what the personally believed was right. What distinction do you see that justifies one form of tyranny, but not the other?
@Cereal Dude the judge didn't lie. The cop did. The judge erred in granting a motion that was never put forward, however. But that's not lying. It's not illegal. And it's not even close to committing perjury. That cop lied on a sworn citation, on a sworn police report and when he gave sworn testimony. That's a HUGE deal. Lying in a police report is a felony btw.
@@AlcideIzMine The prosecution is saying that the cop erred while the judge lied. You’re saying that the judge erred while the cop lied. I believe that both parties deliberately lied to achieve what they thought was right. Both were deliberately subverting justice and their sworn responsibilities.
The judge was EXTREMELY patient with that prosecutor. I’m honestly shocked she didn’t get told to quiet down and stop speaking over the judge. Extremely unprofessional and immature on her behalf.
and then they demoted the judge after this!!! that shows you how corrupt everything is. This is about potential liability and lawsuits; they have to go with the narrative OR ELSE
We need more Judges like him who can see through all the lies, deceit and corruption by police onto people and in fact the Justice System when they knowingly lie to the court.
Can't have that in the US. The system is literally built on the foundation of throwing as many people in jail as possible. Now, to disrupt that system would disrupt America's foundation. Of course I agree with you, Frank. The sad truth however, is the people in charge don't agree with us.
I've been saying for decades now that cops and DAs don't care if they've arrested or prosecuted the wrong person. As long as someone goes down for the crime . It makes it appear they are doing their job. Innocent people are let out of jail all the time after decades behind bars. 💯
That prosecutor should be sued in civil court. And charged with contempt of court. Not to mention some kind of investigation on how she got a judged benched for putting her in her place
When cops have to go to court and testify, and they are caught telling a lie under oath, they immediately need to be prosecuted right then and there on the spot
All cops have Qualifying Immunity so they can lie cheat and steel on duty not have to be responsible for their actions. It's wrong, but the dirt bags are running with it.
"it's a mistake" that no one Breathalyzer but he still checked that he did and she failed. Like honestly how do you make that "mistake" you either did the test or didn't, either failed or didnt.
@@jsmith-u5i What we don't need are cops who are allowed to get the benefit of the doubt when they fail to produce evidence for their assertions. We get too much of that already.
I can't believe my ears. This judge is a true patriot. We should have more judges like him. Clean and fair trials. My admiration goes out to this incredible judge for doing the right thing and having absolute integrity in the legal system.
In fairness, we don't know the level of his patriotism, just that we really appreciated his righteous anger toward this prosecutor. Personally, I found his impression of every angry wife/gf in an argument ever to be spot on when he got very quiet while straightening up his desk and listening to the prosecutor make her case before ruling in the defendant's favor. It was enthralling.
@TiptonMama IT WASN'T ONLY HIS ANGER TOWARDS THE PROSECUTOR FOR TRYING TO COVER & ALLOW A TYRANT TO LIE ON THE STAND, BUT ALSO HIS ANGER TOWARDS THE LYING TYRANT!!!!!!
@@pamelafrye4667 Yeah, that too. I still don't think this singular interaction is any indication of his patriotism. Call me crazy if you will, but it takes more than one act to convince me of one's love for our country.
He did a great job of taking up for the defendant, but then did a complete 180 by taking it upon himself to grant a new trial even though one wasnt requested. THAT is what he was punished for.
@@trumplostlol3007I don't believe that warranted him being removed. He may not have followed normal court procedures but as far as I know, nothing he did was illegal and I was under the impression that judges have a lot of discretion.
That's not the side that their bread's buttered on. I know, I ended a sentence with a preposition. Even that addendum could be considered a run-on sentence. Edit: That's not the side upon which their bread is buttered.
is funny how the officer that lied and ruined a citizens life based on a lie gets away scot-free mean while the judge that catches the lying criminal cop gets punished for doing his job and finding the truth to a case this judge should be commended and promoted
The big thing here was the arbitrary and contradictory decision to grant a motion for retrial that was never made. Still scratching my head on that one.
All i will say is there's an urgent need for more judges like him and way way less of prosecutors like her. Despite what happened to you judge, you remain a hero in the eyes of many for truth, justice, equity, and being fair minded.
Just like officers say when they arrest an innocent person we simple can’t take your word for it. It’s ironic the judge was pretty much saying the same thing when the prosecutor says it was a mistake.
That poor judge :( His only mistake was letting his emotions get the better of him and moving to do a re-trial. He should’ve stopped at his decision to do a JOA.
This judge literally abused his power. We do NOT need more judges like him. We need more judges willing to follow proper procedures and rule for the truth. Not acquitting defendants because he has a minor disagreement with the prosecutor. That’s incredibly unprofessional. Imagine if this happened the other way around and he did this in favor of the police officer. How would you feel then? You’d be screaming to remove criminal judges from their positions. There is a correct way to handle these cases. How this judge handled it was incorrect. And then to grant a motion that was never submitted by anyone is SUPER shady.
@@PtylerBeats . The prosecution filed charges based on a cops lies and the judge caught them. Then when the prosecution was pressed for any other evidence that they had it was evident that they based the case entirely off of one cops lies but still refused to drop charges so he did his job and dismissed everything with prejudice. That is a judge doing their job and doing the right thing by the letter of the law. The prosecution was wasting taxpayer dollars going after someone that was not proven to have been drunk. The cop lied. Unlawful arrest and charges based on no evidence. I prefer to let a 100 criminals free vs having 1 innocent person in jail.
3:44 The judge could have made a really strong statement here if he said: "Yes, but her admitting that she drank that one beer, was it enough to put her at 0.08? That will never be known since nobody took a breath test nor a blood sample and the cop lied".
I think the main problem was, unless I misunderstood, she was drinking it while driving. But still....that's some extra shady bs by the cop to say he tested her and she was above the legal limit. I love how cops can make "accidents" but everyone else "ignorance isn't a defense".
He lied on official documentation to bypass the legal system and enforce his own feelings. How do you justify that as non-corruption? How is it any better than what the cop did? They both thought they were doing good by breaking the rules. Judges have to follow the rules as well, even when it seems easier to violate them in the name of justice.
@Cereal Dude I've seen judges watch blatant evidence of police corruption and misconduct and they throw away the case. I've seen judges watch blatant evidence showing the defendant as innocent and still charge them. Almost never do they get reprimanded.
@@Krackerboy901 When he granted the motion, what evidence did he have that a motion had been filed? None, he lied. The woman in question admitted to driving drunk and that she was drinking out of a natural ice can. The cop is a criminal scumbag for lying about her being breathalyzed, but in his mind, she was obviously drunk, so he didn’t want to let her out on a technicality. The judge had many avenues he could have taken to right that wrong, but he decided to say “fuck you” to the law and do it his own way. That’s tyranny plain and simple.
@@Krackerboy901 I’ve seen all of that too, and it’s terrible that corrupt judges don’t get reprimanded. What is your point? This judge shouldn’t get a free pass just because other judges get them.
They always want to charge you with "resisting arrest" and "obstruction of justice" or "failure to ID" but what did they do to get those charges to begin with because they weren't charged with anything else but those things.
it's hard to respect cops when there's so many that do this shit. they're not even interested in justice, following protocol, or protecting innocent ppl. it's about abusing their power and knowing they can get away with it
He lied on a lawful document "oh your honor it was just a mistake" such BS...prosecutor heard the officers confession and she still defense him instead just dropping the case... SMH what's wrong with this judicial system
This prosecutors name should be out there for everyone to see how much of a horrible person she is and the fact that they removed that judge shows that our courts are corrupt
He went in the wrong order (he acted before thinking) because he was upset at the prosecutor for violating the rights of the defendant, and ended up violating the defendant's rights anyway.
It's unbelievable how this prosecutor works so hard to ruin a person's life when she should have been the one to drop the charges and file the perjury charge on the cop.
@@lappesjl1 It's about conviction because it's all about money. The word "bench" comes from "bank." The word "defendant" is the same as "trustee." They make you the trustee of your ALL CAPS name, and the prosecutor (state) is the beneficiary. The small fine you pay is nothing compared to the bonds they create that rob the ALL CAPS trust account.
That prosecutor is arguing against acquittal as if it has any affect on her own personal life, yet allowing the fraudulent charges to stand were a huge detriment to the innocent woman that had her license suspended. Imagine being that cold hearted, and for what benefit?
I love the prosecutor" well it's not our problem that we lied the DMV deals with that" kudos to the judge it's sad that he was demoted, should have just stuck to his original dismissal.
This man got caught lying in 4K and the prosecutor is standing her ground confidentiality, that level of narcissistic mindset in someone that can decide your very life and freedom is extremely terrifying
@@SMD2x No. I'm pointing out it's still a pretty good system compared to anything that came before. If you're extremely terrified now, you should see what happens in places where the rule of law is much weaker, and maybe you'll feel better about living in a place where you're innocent until proven guilty and etc.
@Darren New your talking about past times and other countries. I've traveled around the world and see how the laws are in different other countries, I'm talking about in the US of A where there are certain things put in place to prevent what these folks who are suppose to protect and serve us are doing all the damn time. And innocent until proven guilty has never truly been a thing in the states, it sounds good and what it's suppose to be but that just isn't the case. You must not be from the U.S if you think so highly of our government.
Submit your video: forms.gle/CUpEtoKF4cw7apur6
Merch: crowdmade.com/collections/lackluster
- Other Channels -
The Odd Side: ua-cam.com/channels/TSdgjy509mgNBfAa4MQ3gw.html
Lady LackLuster: ua-cam.com/channels/tj-_HlsiOHIZpdjIWsFi_w.html
- Social -
FaceBook: facebook.com/LackLusterVideo
DISCORD: discord.gg/SUcPuym
Twitter: twitter.com/DaleHillerYT
IG: lackluster_media
TikTok: www.tiktok.com/@lackluster_official
I Want to Thank You For The Videos You Put Out. You are different from others. You Stay Neutral. I THANK YOU FOR THAT!! Your Videos Help The Public Really See How and What Really Happens. Not Edited To Show One Side! Keep Up The Good Work My Friend!!!
1:35 that "unintelligible" word the judge used was *_uncontroverted._* So the full question he asked was "Did you hear the *_uncontroverted_* testimony of this officer?"
The word essentially means _undisputed._
@@Eidolon1andOnly beat me by 47 minutes.
If thos ever does ever get a retrial,, all the lady has to say is at most its just open comgtainer charge they can not prove dui as already shown by the officers lies and deceit
Hey man I had a bad experience here in Florida with law enforcement. The Civil Rights Lawyer suggested in his comments you maybe could tell me what to do now that I have the BWC footage.
I love how the prosecutor gets to just argue with the judge. Let a citizen or their defense do the same and they would be held in contempt. Ridiculous
She should be held in contempt for her attitude
@@StewBurtTheRed absolutely, one chance to shut up then drop the hammer
It shows how much the "system" is actually stacked against "the people"..... especially how they took this judge off criminal cases...(not playing by the rules they want him to?)
It's their job to argue
because the prosecutor argued professionally and it's literally her job to argue her case.
when citizens argue and get belligerent it only disrupts the courtroom proceedings.
Boy that Prosecutor really, REALLY, _REALLY_ wanted to violate someone's civil rights.
There’s a nice pay-check with her name on it, if she succeeds.
She is disgusting "mistakes" = lies.
disgusting
That’s what they do.
In part, I understand her position. She is arguing for the state and both sides, defense and prosecution should be robust. That's not to say there isn't the interest of justice to consider.
Two things:
1) She did have alcohol and was drinking it. This at the very least is an open container violation. Wrong charge, but a violation nonetheless.
2) The officer should have been charged with perjury because he willfully lied under oath.
An uncorrupted justice system should have tackled both.
That said, misconduct should come out favorably to a defendant, which is why several legal doctrines are in place to go that route.
My real issue here is that the prosecutor refused to hold the cop accountable, and that is the bigger problem here. Cops are so rarely charged with the crimes they commit while on the job and we won't see things turn around unless that changes. Look at the deputy from LL's last video who wasn't charged with what appears to be multiple felonies. If that's not a sign of a corrupt justice system, nothing is.
These prosecutors is a large part of the problem in this country.
We need more judges like this guy.
State’s Attys, DAs, and mayors campaign on being tough on crime. The public accepts stats, arrests and convictions, as evidence that their elected officials are being tough. If you need convictions to put food on the table, things like this happen.
It’s not a justice system it’s a stats system.
Uneducated juries scare me!
Judges are many times former prosecutors.
@@mikeironhorse they are not just prosecutors, they are also defence lawyers also.
I think the actual root of the problem is the tendency with americans having to "win' at all cost. Even if they KNOW their client is litteraly a murdrer a lawyer will be ADMIRED for making so their MURDERER CLIENT THAT THEY KNOW IS A MURDERER gets away free.
Same thing with guilty verdicts. They get ADMIRED for prosecuting as many people as possible, innocent or not. Sometimes they even LITTERALY get money for every person they send in jail.
How did the judge hold this prosecutor in contempt?! If you or your defense lawyer argued like this with a judge, they’d be in jail for 5-10 days.
That prosecutor fighting tooth and nail trying to make sure that the lie was upheld is truly sickening.
"Yes, your honor. The DUI citation was illegal. However, the DMV suspends licenses based on what the police and/or prosecutors office tells them. It's not our fault that this one cop's lie snowballed into this woman's license being wrongfully revoked but once her license **had** been wrongfully revoked she became responsible for all the consequences to herself that proceeded from the wrongful suspension of her license. She should rot in jail as punishment for this cop's perjury!"
@@randybugger3006 it's funny because you ignore an unlawful command from an officer and anything that follows as a result of that is basicly thrown out due to the unlawfulness of it. You can use force in self defense and cant be convicted of assault or battery because it was found justified.
Just because an act breaks a law doesnt make what led up to it not matter, in fact it matters a lot, especially in more serious cases like murder since that's why theres different degrees of murder. So the fact the prosecutor is trying to go down that road is ridiculous and she should have just gave it up and not wasted tax payer money on this farce.
At worst this is a case of the defendant being slightly over the limit for DUI, at best the defendant was completely legally able to drive so the fact the prosecution was willing to die on that hill just to try and uphold a flimsy DUI charge is astounding she wasnt even just trying to uphold the driving suspended charge she wanted it all to stick, she just refuses to lose and will not accept anything but a guilty quite clearly and her judgement is severely lacking and the fact shes in charge of trying to convict people is scary.
They had to fight because of the officer is found to have lied all the cases he ever brought to prosecution will be under scrutiny.
Her job depends on it
Prosecutors have forever been unaccountable tyrants. Im sorry yourre just finding out how this works :(
It's nuts how the prosecutor backs up the perjury of the officer. I've always said the biggest criminals in the courtroom are sitting at the prosecutor's table.
A resident shot and killed a police officer that entered his home, and our prosecutor entered and searched the mans home. I didn't think that was a prosecutors job.
and behind the bench
New definition of perjury. Perjury = mistake.
SUPER STEVE BLUE LINE GANG!
Absolutely true. They break the law whenever it suits them.
Cop submitted a false legal document,how is he NOT being prosecuted for perjury?
Qualified immunity, And most likely the Good Faith Exception, only the cop misapplied it.
@@petervaczovsky9211I think QI is limited to civil matters. Wouldn't be a defense for committing perjury or any other criminal violation.
@@SteveBurman-t1k from the National Conference of State Legislatures: Qualified immunity is generally available if the law a government official violated isn't “clearly established.” If qualified immunity applies, money damages aren't available even if a constitutional violation has occurred.
yup
@@petervaczovsky9211 The "law" is on their side, regardless of obvious malfeasance.
A judge who is actually concerned with the truth?! We need a man like this in America.
Yup. It’s rare
Yeah VERY rare.
Why do you think he was removed from criminal court? Because he's too concerned with the truth.
...and because of it, he was removed from his court. No surprise there.
They weed those judges out faster than a road pirate planting evidence on you.
That's why you'll never find another 1 like this guy.
A judge like him IS NEEDED in EVERY COURT!!!!!!!!!!
All it takes is one case to sway you?
He got removed from criminal cases for not playing ball with the prosecutor. I think that's the worst part of this.
@@tgatt5759 I was about to say he's not gonna last.
That's why they got rid of him
yet he got fired
That prosecutor is the worst! This is why our justice system is so dismal. Trying to get her locked up based on false pretenses to ruin her life just so she can win.
Female prosecutors bro.
They have a stick up their @$$ and need to prove that they're right 100% of the time no matter the circumstance
Police Perjury is called a mistake.. try that in court and see what happens to you
She should charge the cop with perjury
That's what the so called system is designed for - to win .
@@Brian-sh7oc she won't cause in her eyes out wasn't perjury. It was a mistake.
He should have held that prosecutor in contempt for interrupting him so much.
yup
We need 2 million more of these Judges...
I hope I get my day in court. I have a harassment problem with my local sheriff dept
Yes yes and hell yes you hit the nail right on the head with that one 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
Too bad that he was booted from criminal cases
What Florida got extortion red light cameras up everywhere man 🤔 if a cop see you run a red light they're going to take it the person that's driving the car not the register owner and that's what those red light cameras are doing ticketing the register owner of a vehicle if they're going to put red light cameras up like that it needs to take a picture of the driver to hold that person accountable not the register owner of the vehicle 🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔
Absolutely fucking not. I agree with this judges feelings completely, but he broke legal procedures to enforce those feelings.
Tyranny is tyranny wether or not we agree with the bias, and this judge is a tyrant who was rightfully removed because of his inability to do his job properly. The cop should be fired under the same reasoning.
That prosecutor lost all credibility. Should be disbarred. We need way more judges like this.
Ironically he was asked to step down
She was so annoying, in addition to being an habitual liar on behalf of the State to try to defame this innocent woman. Totally unprofessional behavior, she's lucky she wasn't officially censured for this outrageous performance.
Yes I agree however I did not understand why the next day he wrote the permission for an appeal. I don't really understand it all though.
It's great, the judge was able to catch the mistake before it grew exponentially.
Prosecutor seems to be on some agenda of her own... in face of fact (false evidence, police officer admitting driver was never properly tested for DUI, licenses suspended wrongfully) she continues arguing... while contradicting herself... He admitted he didn't do proper testing and filled out the DUI form himself... prosecutor refuses to press a perjury charge... but wants to pursue driving with wrongfully suspended license.
She refuses to press charges against the officer for perjury, saying "He admitted he was wrong." But still insists on pursuing driving under wrongfully suspended license (Indication is she is trying to weaponize the DUI charges).
2:02 Prosecutor, "You can not summarily dismiss." In face of falsified evidence.
1:43 "DMV is in charge of suspending licensing..." based on falsified test results, by the officer who admitted it was not done properly.
2:29 Prosecutor actually contradicts herself... "He admitted he was wrong." and won't follow up with perjury charges, now she is claiming "He didn't lie."
The only avenue left is whether to charge the cop for perjury, which she already declined. She states she is going to appeal (incredulous).
She would make a great judge... in a Kangaroo court.
Judges who don't cover up police crimes are only of value if they remain professional. If they choose, instead, to act like an impudent juvenile, void of professional conduct, then they become worthless.
Good on the judge! We need more like him.
@triciak: nahhhh, what LACKLUSTER didn't show you is that at 1st he convicted her, altho ...
1.) Cop didn't do breathlyzer 2.) Cop didn't do sobriety tests BIG MISTAKE LADY admitting u had alcohol.
Hopefully she learned ADMIT NOTHING, not even 1-2 drinks. Say "i invoke/stand on my 5th Amendt of US Constitutn
Shame they removed em.
Women should not be DA....cuz they cant stfu. Yes BUT....yes BUT....BUT BUT BUT. Sounds like all women cant seem to keep their BUT to themselves
im just bummed out that the judge screwed himself with the motion.
It’s a rarity
What set the judge off is the prosecution’s refusal to charge the police officer with perjury. It could even be plead to misconduct, but even the judge like most citizens are fed up with police officers not being held accountable.
Na, judge just can’t look it over because it’s on the record.
oh did it ..... Steven? LOL stfu
Notice that they removed the judge for not going along with the narrative.
@@ChristopherJones-lt3le Sure they can. Judges can get up and strip naked while a trial is in session. Courts of Appeal rectify that stuff, but judges have literally gone off the rails and defendants have had to abide by some crazy stuff before they were relieved by a COA.
@@magnificentfailure2390 No they can't. You're being hyperbolic.
Our country needs more judges like this judge . Thank you judge for honoring your oath .
He can't even do criminal cases anymore. Our government punished him for doing his job properly.
@@Adventist1997Exactly 💯
It's a rarity.
It is a sad world when a judge is penalised for giving priority to justice in a case.
@@davidwelch6796
The US is only slightly better than China in this regard because the judge is still alive... It is indeed a very sad world.
I love how the judge is clearly ignoring that crooked prosecutor as she throws a temper tantrum
Karen for sure. Why tell a lie when the truth sounds better.
@brendanmcmahon1162 The Judge could have required the officer, under oath the to show the documents that she was legally tested for alcohol by a certified agent for her BAC!! Perjury would have been next on the officers list of lies!!
The prosecutions "evidence" was that the defendant drank alcohol. That's not illegal. The presence of alcohol in this bloodstream isnt illegal _unless_ it's in excess of the legal limit. Which can only be determined beyond a reasonable doubt by a BAC test. A BAC test the officer filled out in absence of an actual test. That's not ticking the wrong box. That's filling out a fake blood alcohol content number and ticking the box. Cut and dry perjury on an official record. And how tf did the defence not pick up on this?
You can bet if a citizen had committed perjury on an official record that prosecutor would be out for blood. She's obviously corrupt and needs to be officially investigated.
Maybe she's gunning for DA and needs to show a high conviction rate to pursue her political aspirations.
She's not throwing a temper tantrum, she is scrambling to save her case because she knows the cop screwed the pooch.
I remember that video.
The prosecutor was admitting she wasn't going to prosecute the cop for perjury. No shock there. But too bad the judge DIDN'T throw her in jail for failing to do her job
The prosecutor's lucky she didn't get thrown in jail for contempt of court for arguing with the judge
I love this judge.
If the judge did that, he would have been dragged or disbarred. The judiciary and state are not separate, they know each other. Judges talk and schmooze with prosecuters while acting like their decisions are fully rational.
Don't let the Civic 101 lessons fool you into thinking judges are above being friendly with the police.
@@MegaSimmaster oh I know.
Many are even more corrupt.
Some are drinking/poker buddies with them
"contempt of court" For doing her job?
I love how people like you let your inner tyrants show when it suits you, despite virtue signaling against them constantly.
@@gotgunpowder arguing with a judge.
Don't want to prosecute perjury.
But most cops are safe from that
"F" VIRTUE SIGNALING
@@gotgunpowder For talking over the judge REPEATEDLY. You are allowed to make your case. You are allowed to speak passionately. You are NOT allowed to disrespect the judge and his court.
I’m an Air Force veteran and I’ve had to sigh and fill out plenty of official documents. There is no such thing as “making a mistake” on an official document. Especially when that “mistake” leads to a life changing outcome.
Just goes to show how far prosecutors will protect dirty cops
Yeah no way you can forget that you never ran the test. The machine usually prints out a record and everything. This was a total screwjob.
It amazes me how certain folk could give a rats ass about assisting and playing a role of purposely screwing up someone's life. Most will ask, how do they live with themselves?!? Not realizing that these types adjust and purposely keep the company of others like themselves, just to refrain from feeling a way about their behavior by avoiding the company of those that don't accept and are ok with such behavior.
@@junglekutz5625 some people just receive great joy in making others miserable. If you want to ruin someone’s life, get paid to do it, and for the most part receive no backlash for it, become a cop. Most of the time a person being accused of a crime is innocent but because going to trial is a long drawn out and extremely expensive process you’ll be told that pleading guilty is your best option.
Becoming a cop should require a college degree and one year of on the job training with another year of probation. Nobody am learn the job of a cop in 3 months.
thank you for that mic dropping comment
An officer lies, under oath, it is treated as a "mistake". But when we (the public) do the same exact thing, it is treated as a crime.
The cop claims it's a "mistake" only when he gets caught lying on a sworn document. If we do something like that, we'll likely be in court trying to stay out of jail and/or keep our bank account somewhat whole.
Given the fact that the prosecution knows the reason why her license was suspended and still wanted to continue to charge her, is just fucking amazing.
karma is a bitch and i hope one day shes changing a tire and karma hits her at 100mph
THAT'S CORRUPTION FOR YA!!!!! IT'S ALL ABOUT GETTING CITIZENS IN THE SYSTEM, TAKING THEIR MONEY & NEVER LETTING GO OF THEM!!!!!!
Business as usual, they don’t give a fuck about justice, they want a high conviction rate at any cost.
It's because the DA is usually an elected official. Thru can't appear soft on crime for any reason
No its cool that a cop lied on paperwork because some witnesses after the fact and her own testimony proves she drank and drove. Despite the whole premise being that she was above the legal limit for BAC, not that she had an open container in her vehicle.
I mean that'd be a whole DIFFERENT charge and case though.
If the policeman was caught lying, he should be fired because his testimony will never be held worth a darn again. Once a liar is always questioned from then on and never believed. .
yup
We need more judges like this. It would be amazing if we had 20,000 more judges like this.
Do you see why there Aren't? He was removed from criminal courts for defending someone's constitutional rights.
He was demoted for being righteous..
@@JohnDoe-qz1ql No, he was removed because after acquitting her, he later approved a retrial. That's double-jeopardy. The judge violated her constitutional rights. He was advocating for her in the beginning, but as soon as he changed his mind, he fucked up BIG TIME. If he had let his ruling stand, he would have been an awesome judge, but he didn't. He defended one of her rights while trampling another. You can't do that.
Note they removed the judge from office.
A real judge!
The part that upset me the most is that they removed him from criminal cases all because he did the right thing and stood behind it.
He shouldn't have rescinded his acquittal, the defense was absolutely right to call that out as double jeopardy. He weakened his standing with his peers by getting wishy-washy.
Nah they removed him because he acquitted her and then made an order for retrial after the fact, which made no sense. His attitude was also a concern but if you listen to that stupid prosecutor she was right up there in that nonsense. The system is flawed that's for damn sure.
Where is the tv stations to do an exclusive on these people and chase them to their cars for answers,
That judge was as honest and honourable a man for standing up against them doing a wrong on this woman.
Shame on the prosecution.
Liberals did that
I'm upset that this guy loses his job, but the nothing happened to the judge that let Brock Turner off or the one or who let off the "affluenza" kid
Any officer caught perjuring themselves should immediately charged and all cases he/she was involved in needs to be reviewed. Period!
The one thing I absolutely hate about prosecutor is they literally have basically no information to go off but their job is to paint you as the worse possible person regardless of if you did or didn’t do something. It’s genuinely sad.
Not exactly. Good prosecutors will have a good judgement of what should and should not be pursued. Bad ones simply listen to the cops assuming that they are always right and honest.
Dobbie Gillis is NO longer on tv.
@@trumplostlol3007 Yeah but that’s also like saying most cops will act in good faith🤷🏽♂️ I want to say I do like cops. I believe their jobs are necessary, I just don’t believe in humans.
@@Datboykeke Unfortunately, many of the cops are poorly educated and poorly trained. They have a toxic police culture from those older poorly educated and poorly trained police officers. You don't need 100% or 50% of bad cops to mess up our justice system. You only need 10% or even 5% of bad cops to put citizens in danger. It is just like our society. You don't need 50% of criminals. You only need 5% of criminals. How many of these cops are potential criminals? Currently, it is hard to get rid of bad cops because of the system. Bad cops end up circulating WITHIN the system. They move from county to county or state to state even after they are dismissed a couple of times.
Unless you are a cop who perjured himself. Then they all turn into defence lawyers.
It's absolutely disgusting that the prosecutor is trying so hard to justify what the cop did AFTER the cop admitted to lying. The worst part is that they removed this outstanding judge so that justice doesn't prevail again. We the people need to do something about this.
Don't vote for local morons that would have elected this prosecutor to the bench.
Nobody in the justice system is allowed to be good. All they want are corrupt liars so that they can milk as much money as possible out of law abiding citizens. The fact that this woman was arguing this hard to convict this woman after the cops lied, shows what government is all about. convicting people regardless of guilt/innocence.
Thats america
He old asl
@An Ge no that's amerikkka.
I'm amazed the judge didn't hold the prosecutor in contempt.
He doesn't prescribe to other people's fragile egos. And doesn't appear to sink to their level either. Gotta give to the man, he has some good principles.
@@GranPuba Yep, he does, that's why he was removed from his position... The system is designed to hold itself up
He should Have.
Anybody else notice how quick they were to remove a judge who has a sense of justice? This is our legal system at work here. The good cops and good judges walk on eggshells while the bad ones get every form of protection under the sun. Absolutely disgusting.
hey, it's Florida
@@JuanLopezCortes
That’s the problem with this country right now. Liberals have insane, absurd authoritarian ideals they try and force onto everyone. Republicans have rampant corruption and keep old, outdated laws in place regardless of it it defies logic to do so. Both of these parties and their fighting has turned this country into a cess-pit of degeneracy and insanity.
There needs to be a new political party, one catered around the people in the middle, as it’s obvious these parties aren’t worthy of the people of this country.
He wasn’t being a good judge, though. He let his sense of right and wrong get in the way of procedure. He could have followed the proper procedure and still ruled the same way. As he admitted, he got too emotional, presumably over the injustice being perpetrated by the DA’s office.
@@burke615hard to not get emotional when she’s defending a crime. I think the judge is right, anyone could get mad arguing with such an annoying brick wall
@burke615 she's defending a crime, wtf is he supposed to do??? Let that b!t# continue to run her mouth and waste time?
If I had been that judge I would have had the bailiff escort her out of my courtroom.
For this prosecutor to go hard and not have this LEO take any accountability for his "mistake" is what's wrong with our justice system! Disgusting!
hey, it's Florida
And because she defended his lie just to win her case, she will also never prosecute his perjury. This conflict of interest is why the cop felt safe to lie on his report! Corruption at its finest.
I’m insanely surprised the judge didn’t hold the prosecutor in contempt
Edit: Also… now that I think about it, how is this not a Brady violation? The cop who arrested her for the DUI admitted under oath he falsified evidence that she was drunk when he pulled her over. The Judge is the one who caught that in the case file for her DUI, not the defendant’s lawyers which means they probably didn’t have the file. If that’s the case then the prosecutor isn’t just in contempt of court, but she’s openly violating Brady V Maryland by not providing the case file to the defendant’s lawyers which proves she shouldn’t have been convicted in the first place.
She wasn't contemptuous, just disgusting.
@V M Everyone does, eventually.
@@karlshaner2453 - She may not have been in contempt, but she is most certainly contemptible.
I was waiting!
Yes and the officers mistake done by a civilian would have resulted in arrest, the prosecutor is trying to pad her convection rate for political reasons scarcest kind of attorney
I can't believe how she just kept trying to talk over him. A JUDGE, no less. And she's squawking back at him like he's on of her kids. He's telling her to charge him with perjury and she's flat out refusing.
She sounds like Darrel Brooks
To be fair it's up to the prosecutor who gets charged unless it's contempt of court
She was correct that the judge should not rule on a motion until both sides have stated their case. The judge’s righteous indignation got him a little off track there. His heart was in the right place, but you still have to follow the law, which includes letting the non-movant have their say.
@Brian Clark she was supposed to drop the charge of driving on a suspended license as she knew of the exculpatory evidence of the license being wrongfully suspended. Choosing to charge and prosecute after having exculpatory evidence is a crime. She committed the legal malpractice and the federal felonies of malicious prosecution and deprivation of rights under the color of law.
@@EAMitch None of that excuses the fact that the judge didn't let her present her argument on the motion at hand. There are rules in law, and it is important they be followed. Everything you said is a case for the state bar's ethics board and/or further proceedings, not for that moment in the courtroom.
He should have held the prosecutor in contempt of court.
A mistake is forgetting a person name or something equally as trivial, putting a person in jail and taking their ability to travel based on a lie is criminal. The lawyer is a joke!!!
The officer lied, yet instead of backing down and pressing charges of against the officer. The prosecutor runs to his defence! That prosecutor 100% what is wrong with the justice system!
She even said they were planning to give her a civil charge for the dui
Lawsuit city. He should go to prison. Why was the prosecutor not removed from office as well?
The prosecutor did exactly what she was supposed to do. Get a convintion by any means necessary. Why would they remove her? They probably gave her a raise
Time under her boss's desk?
crooked DA and crooked cops have friends in higher places than the judge apparently
@@mattbrown5511 🔥
So a judge who actually seeks justice get reprimanded
The judge got punished for being a decent human being. I applaud him
Not quite. The judge was punished for taking it upon himself to grant a new trial even though no one filed a request for a new trial.
@@johnn6740 Like I said...being a decent human being
@@DiverDan1000-3 yeah, but that's pointless when he already acquitted her. The new trial would be to charge her after the fact.
God bless the judge 👏😎
The disgusting part is that the cop was never charged for perjury, yet the judge who, while he lost his temper, was doing the right thing and got punished for it.
It's not a mistake when you knowingly choose to check a box on a legal document for something you knew didn't happen. There's no halfassing when ppls lives and rights are at stake
I teach. I was taught that the ABSENCE report was a legal document whereby I was swearing that those students were in / absent from my class at the time it was recorded. A public school absence record.
They don't care about people's lives.
We are simply pawns on a piece of paper for them to continue to persecute
@@andrewlayton9760 I worked temp jobs for a while. Sometimes we had to record our own time. The time sheets are legal documents and falsifying them constitutes fraud. For a part time temp job.
If you're a police officer it's a mistake. If you're a civilian it's perjury.
Need more judges like this. From the second they admitted perjury he threw them out.
He needed to stick by his decision though, instead of approving a nonexistent motion for a retrial afterwards.
He waited until the jury wrongfully convicted her for driving on a suspended license that wasn't supposed to be suspended but was due to perjury.
@@EAMitch That seems to be the part nobody talks about: every single person on that jury needs to be investigated. How on earth they were able to vote "guilty" when the entire cop's testimony was based on perjury is mind blowing.
how can it be perjury when it was a misstate between two similar cases of what that I could understand the prosecutor is saying, but still, that is like malpractice she should be able to sue them?
@@Trip_Ts The officer perjured himself by stating she failed the dui test on the paperwork. The paperwork was then admitted into evidence but the officer in his sworn testimony stated he actually did not complete the dui test (as there was no-one at the station that could do so). The fact the officer stated that she had taken the test and failed it (on the paperwork) is where the perjury comes in. Malpractice comes in if they can prove that the prosecutor knew that the test was not done and yet still entered the documents in as if the test had been done. That was case A
Case B was when the woman was stopped 2 weeks later on a suspended license. The license was suspended due to the actions in case A. I am not sure if case A had been adjudicated fully by the time case B was in court.
This is refreshing and there is hope for humanity after all!
Everyone portrays defense lawyers as scumbags. It's prosecutors who are criminals. She knew the officer lied and all subsequent charges were void but she still kept pressing the issue! Have to get those conviction numbers!
“Defense attorneys are criminals, they know the defendant lies and still defend them!”
I’m js both attorneys are doing their jobs. Illegally arresting people isn’t the cops job.
@@uhok6712 it's not the prosecutor's job to convict at all cost but to find the truth. Prosecutors should seek evidence against AND FOR the accused.
@Uh Ok
Criminal attorneys are not there to get the guilty off. They are there to protect the accused individual rights. If that means the defense attorney finds procedural errors, lies in an LEO's claims, or perhaps constitutional issues with search, then so be it. Cops lie with impunity. Someone needs to guard against official abuse. Lord knows prosecutors don't.
@@Frank_inSA no, it’s absolutely not the prosecutors job to find the truth. That’s up to the judge or jury. All prosecutors do is represent their sides legal position. Attorneys represent the defendants position and prosecutors represent the victims position. It’s their job to do the best they can at representing their clients position, not to find the truth.
Telling a judge he can't dismiss something is a bold move
Just imagine her in uniform looking for offenders.
Lets see how this turns out, Cotton.
I am amazed that this judge was punished. This is heroic behavior.
The judge wasnt punished for the way he treated the prosecutor. He was punished for taking it upon himself to grant a new trial even though no one filed a request for a new trial.
This is in California, and I bet he was NOT a Democrat Judge, so they Crucify him for the Benefit of the DNC.
@@johnn6740 He was also removed from criminal cases because he gave a directed verdict that acquitted the defendant. The "machine" had one less victim to financially rape. Can't have that!
You can’t be a good person in the system.
The judge is not above the law. There are court procedures that must be followed. And a judge should not get too personal with the prosecutor or the defense attorney.
I went against a prosecutor like that. All the evidence showed I was innocent and the officers stories had super holes in it. Instead of letting justice prevail she wanted to argue with the judge trying her best to get me convicted. Even having all the details that I was innocent. Judge told her that she would be ashamed of herself.
Me too. The jury then unanimously acquitted me. No one wants to take the case suing the cops though.
Civil litigation
@@sienile try an out of state lawyer.
They only care about stats to send you to prison so they can move up in their career. Prosecutors do not care about the truth, they are worse than defense attorneys
A lying cop?!? I’ve never heard of such a thing…😮
Neither did I. this must be very the first time in history. So the cop lie...
prosecutor -"providing false info under the oath is not lying your honor! And I will NOT let you speak the L word today! >:(
I'm sure the cop only lied because officer safety was in jeopardy. 🙃
🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣 good one
Even good judges get punished. Our society lifts up the wrong types of people.
From what I hear it’s really hard to f with a judge. If anyone is above the law they are the first on that list. Only goes up from there
To be fair here - he made a mistake. One which is at the core of the criminal law, which is kinda disqualifying in itself.
In my mind the joa was fair on grounds of false evidence by the police, BUT he cannot aquitt somebody and open a trial on the same charge again. That was stupid - and maybe it was him istting in his chamber thinking about how it would have been handeled better - BUT and that is the point he di not have the foresight nor the evenhandedness in the moment to think his actions through all the way, which is for a judge bad.
His actions as a human are awsome, if evidence has been tempered with, it must be thrown out, if that evidenec is all the state has, the case needs to be thrown out, however his rash descisions to act only upon that one piece of evidence rather the whole (like the procecution said: statement of the driver themself that they dranks omething), made his decision and him volnurable to backlash.
If he'd said joa fuill stop it would have been fine
If he's said we're throwing out the police statement, and with that we go to trial and in that trial made a deciison taht would have been fine also.
But he violated 2 principles as a judge
a) don't trial a person for the same thing twice
b) be evenhanded and levelheaded don't let your anger (which is understandable in this case) get to your ability to make decisions.
@@blakehansen5434 Actually I would say the first on the list are cops as seen by this case. The cop clearly lied. The prosecutor clearly defends the cop's crime.
@@alberich3099 wouldn’t you think the prosecution is getting the drivers statement that they had consumed alcohol, and the other signs leading the Leo to believe the driver was impaired came from statements made by the LEO on the incident/arrest report already shown to be falsified. If the officer lied about the the driver testing over the legal blood alcohol content limit then how could anything else on the report be viewed as credible. Also how was there nobody qualified to test the driver at the time of arrest, what qualifications are needed to have someone blow into a tube, it’s not as if a medical professional is required. Even if the driver did state they had “drank something” that doesn’t prove, or even suggest they were over the legal limit to operate a motor vehicle.
@@CockyBalboa Your coment is totaly beside the point of what the judge did.
You can argue all day long if the case should never have been brought to court - but it did.
And the judge acted humanly but stupidly with respect to the law.
But for the sake of argument.
A) you could make the argument that the case should not have gone to court, but it did and with that the judge must act accordingly to the law and the rules of the BAR
B) alcoholtesting not beeing done is a failour ont the prosecution - that however doesn't affact the mistake the judge made. He could have pointed that out, saying "any eyewitness of impairment doesn'T rise to the level to convict therefore the carges beeing dropped" but he didn't
c) Admitting to have drunken something while driving is always going to be taken against you, even with beeing under the legal limit, if you then have eyewitnesses you saw you impaired (as with A)) you have a real hard case - admitting is stupid if you want fo fight i.
So in short, while nice your comment is absolutly besides the point I raised.
How is a cop lying on a document not considered falsifying evidence 🤔 I mean if I mess up my paperwork at water plant that's a felony charge
That prosecutor is ridiculous!!!!! Love the judge! Gives you a little hope. Ok, that was before the end regarding the judge.
The prosecutor argues with herself in the shower with her shower head
The judge violated the rules legal proceedings to enforce his personal feelings. Just like the cop did.
Why do you support the judge, but not the cop? They both lied on official documentation to do what the personally believed was right.
What distinction do you see that justifies one form of tyranny, but not the other?
@Cereal Dude the judge didn't lie. The cop did. The judge erred in granting a motion that was never put forward, however. But that's not lying. It's not illegal. And it's not even close to committing perjury.
That cop lied on a sworn citation, on a sworn police report and when he gave sworn testimony. That's a HUGE deal. Lying in a police report is a felony btw.
@@AlcideIzMine The prosecution is saying that the cop erred while the judge lied. You’re saying that the judge erred while the cop lied.
I believe that both parties deliberately lied to achieve what they thought was right. Both were deliberately subverting justice and their sworn responsibilities.
@@cerealdude890 I think that the prosecutor and judge despise each other and the case was the battle ground for both their egos.
The judge was EXTREMELY patient with that prosecutor. I’m honestly shocked she didn’t get told to quiet down and stop speaking over the judge. Extremely unprofessional and immature on her behalf.
and then they demoted the judge after this!!! that shows you how corrupt everything is. This is about potential liability and lawsuits; they have to go with the narrative OR ELSE
hey, it's Florida
It looked like he was enjoying it.
We need more Judges like him who can see through all the lies, deceit and corruption by police onto people and in fact the Justice System when they knowingly lie to the court.
Can't have that in the US. The system is literally built on the foundation of throwing as many people in jail as possible.
Now, to disrupt that system would disrupt America's foundation.
Of course I agree with you, Frank. The sad truth however, is the people in charge don't agree with us.
Should be thrown into prison rec room in police uniform for 48 hours....
This judge is a complete badass and completely embodies what it means to be in his position!!
MEGA respect to this Judge. That prosecutor should be disbarred.
Amazing how prosecutors only care about wins not the truth or justice.
I've been saying for decades now that cops and DAs don't care if they've arrested or prosecuted the wrong person. As long as someone goes down for the crime . It makes it appear they are doing their job. Innocent people are let out of jail all the time after decades behind bars. 💯
that's literally their job, so too the defense team only cares about wins
Man I wanted to clap out loud for this judge!!! We need more like him. So sad he was "disciplined" for doing the right thing. Welcome to 1984.
That prosecutor should be sued in civil court. And charged with contempt of court. Not to mention some kind of investigation on how she got a judged benched for putting her in her place
When cops have to go to court and testify, and they are caught telling a lie under oath, they immediately need to be prosecuted right then and there on the spot
All cops have Qualifying Immunity so they can lie cheat and steel on duty not have to be responsible for their actions. It's wrong,
but the dirt bags are running with it.
"it's a mistake" that no one Breathalyzer but he still checked that he did and she failed. Like honestly how do you make that "mistake" you either did the test or didn't, either failed or didnt.
@@Bosilaify Good old lawyer softsoap, hoping that the judge will fall for it.
@@jsmith-u5i What we don't need are cops who are allowed to get the benefit of the doubt when they fail to produce evidence for their assertions. We get too much of that already.
The officer is a liar.
charges should be brought against this officer...
I can't believe my ears. This judge is a true patriot. We should have more judges like him. Clean and fair trials. My admiration goes out to this incredible judge for doing the right thing and having absolute integrity in the legal system.
In fairness, we don't know the level of his patriotism, just that we really appreciated his righteous anger toward this prosecutor.
Personally, I found his impression of every angry wife/gf in an argument ever to be spot on when he got very quiet while straightening up his desk and listening to the prosecutor make her case before ruling in the defendant's favor.
It was enthralling.
@TiptonMama IT WASN'T ONLY HIS ANGER TOWARDS THE PROSECUTOR FOR TRYING TO COVER & ALLOW A TYRANT TO LIE ON THE STAND, BUT ALSO HIS ANGER TOWARDS THE LYING TYRANT!!!!!!
@@pamelafrye4667 Yeah, that too. I still don't think this singular interaction is any indication of his patriotism.
Call me crazy if you will, but it takes more than one act to convince me of one's love for our country.
Honor and respect to judges who believe in unbiased truth and justice
I can only hope that there are more judges with his integrity in our courtrooms. Maybe all hope is not lost.
He was removed from criminal trials for doing the RIGHT thing though!!!!!! That ALONE SPEAKS VOLUMES!!!!!!
wish judge would have had cop and prosecutor held in contempt
It's infuriating that he was removed. I thought he was absolutely glorious in his defense of the woman who had been treated so egregiously.
He did a great job of taking up for the defendant, but then did a complete 180 by taking it upon himself to grant a new trial even though one wasnt requested. THAT is what he was punished for.
He failed to follow the normal court procedures. Of course he needs to be removed.
@@trumplostlol3007I don't believe that warranted him being removed. He may not have followed normal court procedures but as far as I know, nothing he did was illegal and I was under the impression that judges have a lot of discretion.
The judge is very honorable and objective! We definitely need more judges like him!
Honorable is not a bit ignorant in his error in granting a retrial.
The prosecutor is what’s wrong with this country!
1 of many reasons .
Why don’t the prosecutor fight for regular citizens like this ????
That's not the side that their bread's buttered on.
I know, I ended a sentence with a preposition.
Even that addendum could be considered a run-on sentence.
Edit: That's not the side upon which their bread is buttered.
is funny how the officer that lied and ruined a citizens life based on a lie gets away scot-free mean while the judge that catches the lying criminal cop gets punished for doing his job and finding the truth to a case this judge should be commended and promoted
The big thing here was the arbitrary and contradictory decision to grant a motion for retrial that was never made. Still scratching my head on that one.
@@Krakaet Yes, that is what got him in trouble.
There is no room in our legal system for truth. The win of a conviction is all that matters.
I've seen this footage a while ago. This prosecutor is annoying
Please ... she's More than just annoying .
Wow, a judge would never let anyone else talk to him like that. He should have held her in contempt.
White woman entitlement
Judges and lawyers are friends.
They mix it up a lot.
For what? The lawyer is saying everything lawful if he does its against the law... Shes arguing a case which is the entire point of a court
The way he was taking to her he definitely held some contempt, just didn’t make it official
All i will say is there's an urgent need for more judges like him and way way less of prosecutors like her. Despite what happened to you judge, you remain a hero in the eyes of many for truth, justice, equity, and being fair minded.
Just like officers say when they arrest an innocent person we simple can’t take your word for it. It’s ironic the judge was pretty much saying the same thing when the prosecutor says it was a mistake.
Look it up . They removed this judge from traffic court because of this case
Recused from all criminal dockets. I mention it. Crazy stuff.
@@LackLusterMedia why?
@@librab103 wow.. hopefully someone can provide a valid reason for his removal
LOL Welcome to russia baby!
@@spicydiarrhea5662 what does Russia have to do with anything?
That poor judge :(
His only mistake was letting his emotions get the better of him and moving to do a re-trial. He should’ve stopped at his decision to do a JOA.
Should have used the gavel and told get to sit down.
He made a mistake.
@@27613James we all do, he's a good human, and it shows.
@@27613James funny you say that, that’s exactly what the prosecutor and cop said about “cop”
It sucks because she was emotional af herself
I'm actually surprised the judge was willing to stand by his conviction with this case. I tip my hat to him for that.
We need more judges like this man.
Thankful that such judges still exist. We need more like this and weed out the criminals in our justice system.
And they removed him from the courts.
they do exist but they get shove to the side.....
This judge literally abused his power. We do NOT need more judges like him. We need more judges willing to follow proper procedures and rule for the truth.
Not acquitting defendants because he has a minor disagreement with the prosecutor. That’s incredibly unprofessional. Imagine if this happened the other way around and he did this in favor of the police officer. How would you feel then? You’d be screaming to remove criminal judges from their positions. There is a correct way to handle these cases. How this judge handled it was incorrect. And then to grant a motion that was never submitted by anyone is SUPER shady.
@@PtylerBeats . The prosecution filed charges based on a cops lies and the judge caught them. Then when the prosecution was pressed for any other evidence that they had it was evident that they based the case entirely off of one cops lies but still refused to drop charges so he did his job and dismissed everything with prejudice. That is a judge doing their job and doing the right thing by the letter of the law. The prosecution was wasting taxpayer dollars going after someone that was not proven to have been drunk. The cop lied. Unlawful arrest and charges based on no evidence. I prefer to let a 100 criminals free vs having 1 innocent person in jail.
Too bad he did not prosecute the cop AND the da for perjury!! That would have been true justice!!
3:44 The judge could have made a really strong statement here if he said: "Yes, but her admitting that she drank that one beer, was it enough to put her at 0.08? That will never be known since nobody took a breath test nor a blood sample and the cop lied".
Precisely.
0.8 would have killed her. You mean 0.08?
I think the main problem was, unless I misunderstood, she was drinking it while driving. But still....that's some extra shady bs by the cop to say he tested her and she was above the legal limit. I love how cops can make "accidents" but everyone else "ignorance isn't a defense".
I'm surprised he took that crap from her as long as he did.
🎯
How did the lawyer manage to talk over the judge and argue with him without being held in contempt?!
THAT'S WHAT I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW!!!!
Because she is the prosecutor
Could be cuz she is also a waaamaaannn
Probably because she's trying to argue actual law.
Finally a competent and non corrupt judge and he gets punished for something so little, unbelievable.
He lied on official documentation to bypass the legal system and enforce his own feelings. How do you justify that as non-corruption? How is it any better than what the cop did? They both thought they were doing good by breaking the rules.
Judges have to follow the rules as well, even when it seems easier to violate them in the name of justice.
@Cereal Dude I've seen judges watch blatant evidence of police corruption and misconduct and they throw away the case. I've seen judges watch blatant evidence showing the defendant as innocent and still charge them. Almost never do they get reprimanded.
@@cerealdude890 cop based it on lies, judge used evidence, HUGE difference
@@Krackerboy901 When he granted the motion, what evidence did he have that a motion had been filed? None, he lied.
The woman in question admitted to driving drunk and that she was drinking out of a natural ice can. The cop is a criminal scumbag for lying about her being breathalyzed, but in his mind, she was obviously drunk, so he didn’t want to let her out on a technicality.
The judge had many avenues he could have taken to right that wrong, but he decided to say “fuck you” to the law and do it his own way. That’s tyranny plain and simple.
@@Krackerboy901 I’ve seen all of that too, and it’s terrible that corrupt judges don’t get reprimanded. What is your point? This judge shouldn’t get a free pass just because other judges get them.
They always want to charge you with "resisting arrest" and "obstruction of justice" or "failure to ID" but what did they do to get those charges to begin with because they weren't charged with anything else but those things.
You forgot "disorderly conduct."
it's hard to respect cops when there's so many that do this shit. they're not even interested in justice, following protocol, or protecting innocent ppl. it's about abusing their power and knowing they can get away with it
If ALL judges would be like this gentleman here.
Prosecutor: "NO YOU CAN'T RUIN MY PROSECUTION RATE, I DONT CARE IF THE OFFICER BROKE THE LAW!!"
Only in California do People (like this Prosecutor) THINK they can re-write the System to suit themselves.
@@scottcarr3264 Only in California? Boy do I have some bad news for you.
My brother is a detective and he says this happens all of the time to innocent people. Police are cutting corners on a daily basis.
Duhh and it was even more blatant before body cams
Why isn't he doing anything about it?
Cutting corners? You mean lying?
@@plutotech yes
He lied on a lawful document "oh your honor it was just a mistake" such BS...prosecutor heard the officers confession and she still defense him instead just dropping the case... SMH what's wrong with this judicial system
This prosecutors name should be out there for everyone to see how much of a horrible person she is and the fact that they removed that judge shows that our courts are corrupt
Her name is Diana miers.
He went in the wrong order (he acted before thinking) because he was upset at the prosecutor for violating the rights of the defendant, and ended up violating the defendant's rights anyway.
The prosecutor is simply doing her job. Stop pushing this narrative that prosecutors are just evil people
@@yatzeenotsee that's not at all true. Do you just make stuff up as you go
@@yatzeenotsee Well said. I just don't understand how some of these other commenters didn't see this.
It's unbelievable how this prosecutor works so hard to ruin a person's life when she should have been the one to drop the charges and file the perjury charge on the cop.
All about conviction rates with them. They don't care if you are innocent, they have to get a conviction.
i was looking for this comment. she fought as hard as someone putting a murderer away. it's sickening
@@lappesjl1 It's about conviction because it's all about money. The word "bench" comes from "bank." The word "defendant" is the same as "trustee." They make you the trustee of your ALL CAPS name, and the prosecutor (state) is the beneficiary. The small fine you pay is nothing compared to the bonds they create that rob the ALL CAPS trust account.
Disgusting that the prosecutor was so willing to use perjury to convict and even more disgusting that they would remove the judge. We are all screwed!
That judge needs a raise! Also that prosecutor is a real piece of work!
...raise? He wasn't incompetent nor corrupt. - They removed this judge from traffic court because of this case
That prosecutor is arguing against acquittal as if it has any affect on her own personal life, yet allowing the fraudulent charges to stand were a huge detriment to the innocent woman that had her license suspended. Imagine being that cold hearted, and for what benefit?
👏👏👏 good on the judge
Perjury is never " a mistake " its called lying 🤥
I love how hard the woman is trying to ruin this ladies life
I love the prosecutor" well it's not our problem that we lied the DMV deals with that" kudos to the judge it's sad that he was demoted, should have just stuck to his original dismissal.
She’s desperately defending that cop. So the cop lies and the judge trying to make it right gets punished.
This man got caught lying in 4K and the prosecutor is standing her ground confidentiality, that level of narcissistic mindset in someone that can decide your very life and freedom is extremely terrifying
Less terrifying than a system where there are no judges or procedures and just guys in armor with big swords doing what they want to you.
@Darren New medieval times has nothing to do with this topic. Why troll, you bored?
@@SMD2x No. I'm pointing out it's still a pretty good system compared to anything that came before. If you're extremely terrified now, you should see what happens in places where the rule of law is much weaker, and maybe you'll feel better about living in a place where you're innocent until proven guilty and etc.
@Darren New your talking about past times and other countries. I've traveled around the world and see how the laws are in different other countries, I'm talking about in the US of A where there are certain things put in place to prevent what these folks who are suppose to protect and serve us are doing all the damn time.
And innocent until proven guilty has never truly been a thing in the states, it sounds good and what it's suppose to be but that just isn't the case. You must not be from the U.S if you think so highly of our government.