DID YOU KNOW, THE FIRST 3 POPES OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH ARE MENTIONED IN THE BIBLE
Вставка
- Опубліковано 22 кві 2024
- To help understand and strengthen our belief in the Catholic Faith to the fullest, by sharing of testimonies, information, Catechisms, reflections, articles, questions & answers, etc. as a means of enlightening us to defend, profess & proclaim our Faith.
Thank you once again 💕🙏🏻
You're welcome 🤗
Very interesting/ Thank you !
Yes I know it..That's why I am Catholic and I will remain Catholic...Proud to be Catholic...
St Peter
St Linus
St Anacletus aka Cletus
Praise the Lord...Amen!!!
Thank you. This is very important
🙏🙏🙏
OFF-COURSE. Cleto, Lino and Clemente. They are also mentioned in the Holy Mass!!
The word catholic in Greek is defined as universal, pope as father. The books of the Bible were canonized in 198AD, so not a surprise. What is more compelling is the eighth ecumenical council.
😊😊😊😊
The Roman Catholic Church is the only true church forever.... Hallelujah ❤
4th century BC - through the Council of Nicaea, Jesus was made God (325) and the Holy Spirit was made God as well through another Council (381).
The communion was being performed by eating bread and drinking wine by everyone. After a few centuries, drinking was ommitted.
2 up to 3 popes were present at the same time creating schism in the Catholic Church.
12th century BC - baptism was changed from immersion to pouring of water to the head.
I can mentioned a lot more deviations made by rhe Catholic Church so HOW THEN CAN THE CATHOLIC CHURCH BE THE TRUE CHURCH?
@@Almi047290 Hallelujah Hallelujah Hallelujah Catholic Church forever Hallelujah ❤️
hope they got right with God.
I hope every soul gets right with God. 👍🏻
Jesus Christ established His One True Apostolic Church with His apostles in 33AD, before His Passion. They were called Christians until St Ignatius named Gods Church Katholokis (Universal) in 110AD. Jesus appointed Peter as His first Pope (leader) of His Church. We have the direct succession of Popes dating back to Peter. The list, The Annuario Pontificio is found on the official website for The Vatican, called The Holy See. Gods Catholic Church is the pillar and foundation of truth, 1 Tim 3:15, it’s founded on Peter and the Apostles(first Pope & Priests of Gods Church, with Jesus Christ as the preeminent Cornerstone. Eph 2:19-22
Thanks for sharing 🙏
And the church was called Catholic in Acts 9.31 Koine Greek.
These self proclaimed "interpreters" of the bible don't want to know that😂😂
peter was posthumously labeled the pope in roughly 300 ad.
@@robertstone9342 FALSE! Peter was known as the Pope before Jesus Christs Passion, when He gave him The Keys to Heaven.
i didnt know, interesting..
What about the word or the title Pope, is it found in the Bible?
No it is not. Neither is the word Trinity, and not even the word Bible. The Bible didn't exist yet. Not until the Holy Spirit confirmed the books in His One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church.
I have Never seen the word pope in the Bible or their traditions in the Bible. If it is Not in the Bible, it Must be rejected.
@@darryldavis436Where is Trinity in the Bible yet you believe it
@@darryldavis436 Reject Bible as well. Bible word does not exist in the scripture, so is Trinity. Believe in Satan then.
@@alexisrodrigues4767 Search for the Truth instead of name calling. 1 Timothy 3:15.
"And i say also unto thee, thou art peter, and upon this rock l will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it".
st peter first pope of the Catholic Church.
Absolutely not
Is there any first century evidence for any of these three being Pope in Rome?
None
That's what I thought.
Peter is a messianic Jew!!! And James was the first leader of the church, based in Jerusalem.
How do they think that they are catholic? Noway does it say Paul was a catholic, interpreting it their way.Tdo not know the Bible, I was a catholic myself.
St Ignatius of Antioch ascribed the term Catholic to the Church in AD 107. Paul was already martyred. Paul's bones are entombed in St Paul's outside the walls church in Rome . Yep, Catholic, not protestant
Most if not all was Jews. The Romans back in Peter's time was pagans worshipping idols. The Romans killed Peter. Constantine made the Romans become Christians, so they converted in 306 -337 AD. The numbers don't add up.
@@richardounjian9270 Who do you think killed Peter and Paul ?, Romans. Where do Romans live ? Rome. Where was the Catholic Church when all this was taking place and where was their churches. Something don't add up.
@@darryldavis436 Don't you read the Bible? Ever heard of the letters to the Romans? There was a church in Rome. They met in the catacombs to avoid persecution. You can go to Rome and still see them and the early Christian art down there. So, I don't see your point
So constantine forced people to become Catholic?@@darryldavis436
All 3 were definitely popes. Do your homework
So why does the Roman Catholic Church no longer teach or accept the teachings of St Peter?!?
So which non-Catholic “teaching” are you speaking about? Is it the ones that believe infant baptism is salvific or the ones that do not? Or full immersion or not? Is it the Liberal Evangelical version or the Conservative Evangelical version? Could it be a Calvinist or Armenian or Reformed or the Anglican viewpoint, Dispensationalism, Antinomianism? Those that believe in woman ordinations or same sex marriages? Lord’s supper symbolic or sacramental? The once saved always always saved group or the not? Should women keep silent in church or speak and is this with or without their heads covered? Maybe Mormons, JWs, SDA’s, Christadelphians, or the Oneness Pentecostals position as they too preach from the same bible also??? Surely you cannot think all these positions are acceptable. If not then which one is correct and why do you get to be the one to choose? Is yours the infallible one? If not then maybe the Catholic church IS in fact teaching the teaching of St Peter?
@@srich7503 Twisted interpretations! And you even called Peter's teaching as non-catholic, You reject Peter? You cherry pick things that are beneficial to your doctrine. Disgusting.
Making own interpretations of the Word of God, rather than making the Bible as the Guide to one's life.
The Catholics create more things outside the Bible, they use these outside traditions more than they rely on the Bible.
How sad, saying they Love God? And do nothing to truly Please Him?
@@knightx1850 Instead of putting words into my mouth why not answer the question asked? How about this one. Do you think you can answer this one…
History shows us that Jesus didn't leave us a bible, the apostles didn't tell us which books belong in the bible, the church fathers never agreed on the 27 books of the NT through the 4th century, not only did they not agree but their individual lists of would-be NT canons were GROWING during this time, growing in numbers of hundreds of “inspired” NT writings. So, if it wasn't the Catholic/Orthodox church that compiled the 27 books of the NT in the 5th century with the guidance of the Holy Spirit, and preserved it by laboriously hand copying them over and over throughout the centuries before the invention of the printing press, the “rule of faith” for many, please tell us, show us, who did? And if this church no longer exists today, what good is the text which came forth from her if she couldn't sustain herself?
@@srich7503 2 things:
1. I'm not putting words in your mouth, I'm staying PURE FACTS.
2. Jesus didn't leave us with a Bible? Wows of course, he did quote the Scriptures tho. And if you're gonna use that argument, it'd affect your faith too, why trust the Bible then. Using shallow argumenta just to salvage a Little bit of hope for your false faith? Wowz If only you'd start learning the Word of God properly.
How many traditions did the Catholic create that are purely against scriptures??
Man made intentions overload.
Lastly, it's not the people's job to do the preserving, God does that, the people are merely guided, you cannot give credit to men which is due for God. Just as Jesus said give unto Caesar what is Caesar's, to God what is God's.
@@knightx1850 So you have no gospel? Is that a pure fact? I asked you a question that you could/didnt answer soooooo, Either
1) you are putting words in my mouth?
2) You are lying
3) You have no gospel to proclaim
Which is it sir? Everything else on this thread will have to wait for your ego to catch up…
So many people here protesting Catholicism. I suppose luther king james and calvin had it correct and they corrected the bible 😄😄😄😄🤦🏾♂️. What a joke.
Peter was never a catholic. He said baptize in the " Name of Jesus Christ." The catholic church never followed Peter.
Actually it still does.
I respectfully disagree.
The RCC followers trying hard to explain their rejection of Jesus Christ as the ONE and ONLY mediator and High Priest - 1 Timothy 2:5 and Hebrews 4:14-16
No one denies that. Those are rent free in your head thoughts.
@@darrellperez1029 Maybe that is why I have thoughts and others don't. They prefer to follow other men without thinking.
Rock of Peter but not Roman Catholic. Truth mumbled, jumbled, now tumble
Gee whiz your mind is so closed to the Holy Spirit.
The Church was first called Catholic in AD 107 by St Ignatius of Antioch. Yep, Catholic not protestant 😂
@@richardounjian9270 Catholic means universal. Peter's Rock
@@DennisVellum-jp4mu Yes, it does mean universal or all encompising. What's your point?
Check up with the Vatican. We are hurt at the mudslinging, should not be so
God did not set any man to be a pope, the Catholic Church has never understood Matt.16 the New Testament was written in coin age Greek, when Jesus asked the disciples who they thought he was and Peter said the Messiah, Jesus said he was blessed because God had opened his eyes to that truth. When He said thou art Peter which translated is little rock as in pebble, and then Jesus said and on this rock which He used the Greek for large boulder, I will build My Church He was saying that the truth that He is the Messiah the Son of God is the rock or truth that the Church the body of believers, not just a particular denomination by the way, would be built on. How ridiculous that a whole denomination would think that God would build the Church universal on the shoulders of any fallible human man when Christ Jesus is always to be our focus and guide. I don’t say this to disrespect anyone just pointing out a truth, if you disagree have the courage to study it out yourself and see, God bless!
Joecook when n where n how did the Master says pete on this rock ill build a church are u confusing the txt that say the rock that the builder refuses becomes the head corner stone
And that is an outright lie. Because christianity did not exist in the days of Yahusha Messiah, neither in the days of His disciples/Apostles.
Yahusha was a Natsarene ... not a christian:
Mat 2:23 and came and dwelt in a city called Natsareth - thus to fill what was spokena by the prophets, “He shall be called a Natsarene.”
And so was His followers ....
Act 24:5 “For having found this man a plague, who stirs up dissension among all the Yahuḏim throughout the world, and a ringleader of the sect of the Natsarenes,
Christianity was founded by Emperor Constantine 1 in 321AD. And they changed His Sacred Name, and the christian theology speaks against the Torah of YHWH, which our Messiah Yahusha taught.
Therefore it is an impossibility to be a pope from the catholic church.
St. Lino was from voltera, Tuscana..
Be a Knower and doer of the Word of God Not Catholic Or orthodox or Protestant Jesus Good Advice to Me.
And 2+2 does still equal 4 - but that was not the point of this video.
what's the surprise,the catholic monks wrote most of the bible.
Well, not “wrote” it, the apostles wrote it. But the monks certainly did preserved it by hand over and over throughout the centuries before the invention of the printing press for the rest of the world to enjoy. 👍🏻
I thought a biblical reference will be given where it is said those three mentioned were Pope but i was surprised hearing that it is traditional believe that you are using.
It is very clear that Roman Catholic church came into existence when the Roman Emperor, Constantine, claimed in 312 AD that he saw Jesus on his way when he was going to conquer Rome and after he won the battle and became Emperor, he ordered that Christianity should be the official religion of the Roman Empire and that birthed the Roman Catholic church.
In the new testament times, there was no denominations but the church are designated based on their location e.g. church in Jerusalem, Church in Antioch etc.
Jesus was NOT a Catholic, so why bother❓🤔
Closed hearts can only be opened with your heart humbled to the Lord.
@@tapestry6455 Your ears are very itchy.
The title Pope was used on the 4th century. Apostle Peter died on the 2nd century. So how can Apostle Peter be Pope?
Who gave you the title as a man or woman, you are a tree.
When did the term “Trinity” come into existence and when did the reality of the Trinity come into existence? Can you see a correlation here?
The Pope is the leader of the successors of the apostles, just as Peter was the leader of the apostles .The word was made to describe the position, not the position to fit the word. One of the designations for the position is Peter, still today.
No, they are not. Peter was not a pope. Read your Bible.
Not called Pope at the time but, the position was the same. Btw, you do know that the Bible is a Catholic book, right?
Bible is compiled in 4th century by Catholic Church. If there is no Pope, then there is no Bible as well. Where is the Bible mentioned in scripture in the 1st century after Jesus?
@@richardounjian9270First the bible is not a catholic book. It is a group of 66 individual books that the churches of the time identified as chosen by God to make up the Bible. 39 of which were written by Jews. Second your "first pope" erred in his ways and had to be corrected by the Apostle Paul. The verse which catholics use to say Jesus chose Peter as the first pope is not exact. Cephas means rock or stone, usually a building stone. But this was said in front of Mt Hermon the largest mountain in the region. Jesus could have been referring to the earth....which would make more sense since he said the gates of hell shall not overcome it, which was in Mt. Hermon.
@@markh8740 Wow, your lack of knowledge is amazing. First off, the Bible is 73 books, not 66. The Bible was compiled in 382 at the Council of Rome under Pope Damasus. St Ignatius of Antioch attributed the term Catholic to the Church in AD 107. In 325 at the Council of Nicea, the Church anathamatized the Arians in the name of the Holy Catholic Church. The Nicean Creed uses the phrase: One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church. In 382 the only Christian Church that existed was the Catholic Church. In 382 Damasus charged St Jerome with translating the 73 books into Latin for the use of the Catholic Church. That translation is called the Latin Vulgate and exists to this day. The Bible was unadulterated until Luther came along 1200 years later. Even the original edition of the KJV of 1611 has 73 books.
Where in Scripture does it say that Jesus spoke to Peter by Mount Herdon? Also, if you read the text, Jesus said that He was giving Peter the keys. Also, Paul admonishing Peter proves nothing. To this day bishops have the right to question the Pope. The process is called "dubia" in Latin.
I read my Bible and found out Jesus gave peter the keys of heaven and ask peter to feed his sheep and changed his name to Peter signaling a change of status, Jesus instituted peter the first pope.
Peter was never a Pope the catholic Religion was created by Roman Pagan Priest in the year462 C.E. God the father will show every one in Spirit when they die .Jesus was Born 4BC and died in the year 29CE
🤣 and what do we tell the folks that polemic the silliness that the Catholic church began one century later or one century earlier or how to explain to many when that try to explain the “evil” popes from “even the 2nd century”??? Can i give them your number?😂
Was born in 5 BC and died 30 AD.
All 3 of them were never a pope.
Peter was an apostle to the Jews, not Gentiles (Galatians 2:7)
Peter was one of the 12 to judge the 12 tribes of Israel (Matthew 19:28-30) (Why would he abandon them and take off to Rome?
Peter spoke Aramaic and Hebrew, not the languages of Rome, which was Greek and Latin (Acts 4:13)
Peter was assigned to feed the sheep of Israel, to the day he died (John 21) ) (Why would he abandon them and take off to Rome?
Peter was a fisherman, who had a boat (John 21:3).
Peter was in Babylon, Egypt, and Mark was in Alexandria, Egypt, (1 Peter 5:13)
Peter was writing from or near Jerusalem at the time he wrote 1 Peter 1:1, for the temple was in Jerusalem, not Rome. If Peter was in Rome at the time he wrote 1 Peter 1:1, then this would make him a part of the scattered. He was writing to Jewish Christians in those 5 churches, who were scattered from Jerusalem, who had to leave for their gathering.
They would have left to greet Mark for their gathering (1 Peter 5:13) then continued by boat to Peter, who was 100 miles south. Do you see the water channels leading/funnels to Babylon, Egypt? The logistics were already taken care of by God. If “Babylon” was referring to Rome, that would be a logistical nightmare.
Peter would then escort them for their gathering, to Petra. Petra has a history of flooding, and we see the earth split south west of Petra, which indicates revelation 12 has been fulfilled. The 1260 days was from April 11, AD70 to September 22, AD73.
If you are going to make this about a pope being in Rome, ask yourself, does this fit the biblical narrative?
Where do you see the earth split near Rome indicating where their gathering took place (this place also has to have a history of flooding)?
Please answer the questions.
P.S. Could it be, Eusebius tried to define an "orthodox" view of the relationship between church and state for Constantine, by rewriting history, is that a possibility?
It's proven already.
Typical denial of member of the over 70,000 False, Man Made, Reformed, Heretical, Protestant, Religions and Churches. They WERE the first three Popes in that order.
A typical response of denial from a Protestant. They were the First 3 Popes in that order.
@@juans6639 You are gullible. The idea they were popes, is based on rewritten history by Eusebius. Eusebius was trying to define an "orthodox" view of the relationship between church and state for Constantine. You have been fooled, as well as billions as others.
Peter was an apostle to the Jews, not Gentiles (Galatians 2:7)
Peter was one of the 12 to judge the 12 tribes of Israel (Matthew 19:28-30) (Why would he abandon them and take off to Rome?)
Peter spoke Aramaic and Hebrew, not the languages of Rome (Acts 4:13)
Peter was assigned to feed the sheep of Israel, to the day he died (John 21)(Why would he abandon them and take off to Rome?)
Peter was a fisherman, who had a boat (John 21:3).
Peter was in Babylon, Egypt, and Mark was in Alexandria, Egypt, (1 Peter 5:13)
Peter was writing from or near Jerusalem at the time he wrote 1 Peter 1:1, for the temple was in Jerusalem, not Rome. If Peter was in Rome at the time he wrote 1 Peter 1:1, then this would make him a part of the scattered. He was writing to Jewish Christians in those 5 churches, who were scattered from Jerusalem, who had to leave for their gathering.
They would have left to greet Mark for their gathering (1 Peter 5:13) then continued on by boat to Peter, who was 100 miles south. Do you see the water channels leading/funneling to Babylon, Egypt? The logistics were already taken care of by God. If “Babylon” was referring to Rome, that would be a logistical nightmare.
Peter would then escort them for their gathering, to Petra. Petra has a history of flooding, and we see the earth split south west of Petra, which indicates revelation 12 has been fulfilled. The 1260 days was from April 11, AD70 to September 22, AD73.
If you are going to make this about a pope being in Rome, ask yourself, does this fit the biblical narrative? Where do you see the earth split near Rome indicating where their gathering took place?
If you say that those 3 were never pope,it is the same that you never existed,yet you are alive!
It's not confirmed that they were Catholic. Paul was surely not Catholic, which is evident from his writings, for example in Herbrews Paul speaks that in the NT there should not be many priests like in the OT, but that Jesus is our only priest, the highpriest. In 1 Timothy Paul says that there's only one mediator between God and men, the man Jesus Christ, which disproves the mediation of so called priests and saints
Mediator between God & man is Jesus. Have you told anyone about Christ or the Bible? Then that is being an intercessor. So learn the teaching of the Christian church founded by Jesus.
So what was Church of Christ? Lutheran? No “Christian” denomination exists for another 1500 years.
Go ahead with your own understanding. Go base your salvation to the scripture
John 5:39-40 Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me.
And ye will not come to me, that ye might have life.
Little you know that there is a lot of manuscripts that the Catholic Church holds. If you are follower of the Lord, prove it us. No, prove it to Lord by your works. You cant even obey, so thats a minus point for you. You cant just bark around but no bite. God bless you
The early church was not Catholic.
Not if you compare it cot modern papacy.
No rosary, no praying to saints, no confession etc.
The early church did not have a sovereign state, a bank, a political corps, an army.
The early church did not consider itself above the law of the land. It did not harbour child abusers.
The early church did not mince about in red robes and gowns.
Modern Catholicism is mystery Babylon.
@@geordiewishart1683 hahaha another d3mon manifesting