Score breakdown for Eythora Thorsdottir's 2017 European bronze floor exercise: ua-cam.com/video/_l5THY8015U/v-deo.html Thank you for watching! Always feel free to comment ideas or routines that you want to see. :D
@@nathanielhalls1893 I also found it breathtaking!! I didn't take off any deductions for artistry because she met all of the artistry requirements and was phenomenally expressive and entertaining to watch.
@@airtonpaiva5389 That was probably the strictest deduction I took -- looking back, I probably wouldn't take it again. Gymnastics does have super strict deductions at times and they can be a bit frustrating to see!
I love everything about this routine: the music, the coreography, that gorgeous Mustafina, the powerful tumbling and, especially, that long RO+whip+whip+BH+BH+full in.
That's one of the things I like about Roxana -- she doesn't have huge H skills, maybe, but she has superb artistry and is always super committed to her choreography. I wish there was a way to award some sort of bonus to that, but the only thing one can do is refrain from deducting...
Steps aren't deducted every time in a pass, either you got 0.1 for small one or 0.3 for moderate one/multiple small ones. The same with her chest position, that's as high as it could get (except for the full in). I would've deducted her early piking on that layout, along with the deduction of standing in a corner with 2 feet since she did it more than once.
flexed feet on the layout but agree with everything else. that mustafina!! incredible. can you do one on jade carey where she get nailed on the artistic deductions. super interesting to see when they actually deduct for lack of artistry
Amazing and educational! I'm interested in learning more about the deductions on the leaps for precision and balance. I see many gymnasts be deducted for the same issues in other videos consistently. It is a lack of focus and emphasis on correct execution or is the code demanding too much? Also amazing to see a routine without artistic deductions! Even the best routines I've seen (both beam and floor) have at least 0.1 to 0.3 of artistic deduction consistently, but this routine is choreographed exceptionally!
Hi! I'm not an expert judge, so I could've made a mistake, but I can explain how I've interpreted the rules. On the leap with a balance and precision deduction, I took the balance deduction for a lack of control on the landing (this was an older video; I would probably say lack of control now). She hits the ground and is not in full control, so she kind of spins out quickly after the leap on one leg. The precision deduction is taken when the gymnast isn't on 180° or 360° from their point of takeoff, either if they over or under rotate. Here, given how her foot was oriented at takeoff, she landed a bit under rotated, which in my eyes was a precision deduction (somewhat strict). I'm glad you liked the video! :D
Yeah, and wolf turns are the ones that people get away with the most! ;-; Especially with leaps, I feel like the precision deductions are annoying -- I kind of wish FIG would do something to reward people more for doing super difficult leaps.
@@GymAnalysis well I kinda like the precision and / or balance deduction because gymnast are discouraged to do leaps that they just try to wing it and put in all their might just to get it around. Larisa actually gets away with the precision deduction where there’s choreography out of the gogean which makes it seem very controlled. I believe the precision and balance deductions works in favour of the Chinese considering they’ve been doing their leaps really well for the past decade especially their switch halves
@@bryanthan9363 All true! It's tough for the code to balance quality of elements without being too strict. I do like that the precision deductions, when taken fairly, give a bonus to competitors with clean dance elements.
@@GymAnalysis exactly, I feel like the Chinese has spent so much time trying to perfect dance elements and not do skills that are not perfect and this somewhat disadvantaged them over the past few quads cause deductions were far too lenient previously
Doamne, ce a devenit gimnastica, o sumă de cifre?! Probabil, într-un viitor mai mult sau mai puțin îndepărtat, arbitrii vor fi înlocuiți de un calculator sau un robot care sa calculeze scorul.😁
I feel like this routine could get up to -0,1 for lack of variety in corners three times? O_O She starts every tumbling pass in the same way, judges are obsessed with these little things.
I never got the hype on this girl. I feel like a lot of people like gymnasts from other Countries just because they want to see them succeed (especially this girl because Romania let her get away) but that was a beautiful triple turn with the leg up and the "bobble" deduction you gave her was harsh.
What hype? She's always been underscored. This is her first FX final ever and besides some UB final some time ago (pre injury) she never ranked high. Shame,because she is just amazing.
And this is exactly why I start to dislike the sport. 'Low chest' on her double pike? 'balance' deductions? Waaaaay too many deductions for something that looks so great.
Score breakdown for Eythora Thorsdottir's 2017 European bronze floor exercise: ua-cam.com/video/_l5THY8015U/v-deo.html
Thank you for watching! Always feel free to comment ideas or routines that you want to see. :D
This is the first routine I’ve seen where it was an integration of music, dance and artistry. I didn’t want it to end!
I agree it is amazing!
This is like flipflytumble + sporteverywhere. So good.
Thanks! I love those channels too
@@GymAnalysis can you do Alexa moreno’s floor
@@GymAnalysis and katja serrer’s bars. I’m curious to see how they even evaluated that routine
Still don’t understand how she nailed that Mustafina in podium training, qualifications, and event final. Not even Mustafina’s is that consistent!
I agree; her Mustafina is magical. She's one of the few that seems to always hit her super difficult dance elements.
Did she get any artistry deductions because it’s literally breathtaking
@@nathanielhalls1893 I also found it breathtaking!! I didn't take off any deductions for artistry because she met all of the artistry requirements and was phenomenally expressive and entertaining to watch.
@@airtonpaiva5389 That was probably the strictest deduction I took -- looking back, I probably wouldn't take it again. Gymnastics does have super strict deductions at times and they can be a bit frustrating to see!
I love everything about this routine: the music, the coreography, that gorgeous Mustafina, the powerful tumbling and, especially, that long RO+whip+whip+BH+BH+full in.
Her dancing was awesome.
That's one of the things I like about Roxana -- she doesn't have huge H skills, maybe, but she has superb artistry and is always super committed to her choreography. I wish there was a way to award some sort of bonus to that, but the only thing one can do is refrain from deducting...
Steps aren't deducted every time in a pass, either you got 0.1 for small one or 0.3 for moderate one/multiple small ones. The same with her chest position, that's as high as it could get (except for the full in). I would've deducted her early piking on that layout, along with the deduction of standing in a corner with 2 feet since she did it more than once.
Thank you for the feedback!! That's super helpful to know. :D
I've only recently found your channel but I love the analysis with routine. Helps to understand just what can be found wrong or right. Thank you!
I'm super happy that you find them helpful! If you have any questions, please let me know :)
Please do a series like this!
this edit popped off
Roxana Popa did her very best...
flexed feet on the layout but agree with everything else. that mustafina!! incredible.
can you do one on jade carey where she get nailed on the artistic deductions. super interesting to see when they actually deduct for lack of artistry
Her Mustafina is incredible, I agree. I'll definitely look into making a Jade floor video!
Can someone tell me what is 'wrong'' with her Mustafina? Why does she get a -0,1 for balance? I don't see any problems with her balance.
iconic
Amazing and educational! I'm interested in learning more about the deductions on the leaps for precision and balance. I see many gymnasts be deducted for the same issues in other videos consistently. It is a lack of focus and emphasis on correct execution or is the code demanding too much? Also amazing to see a routine without artistic deductions! Even the best routines I've seen (both beam and floor) have at least 0.1 to 0.3 of artistic deduction consistently, but this routine is choreographed exceptionally!
Hi! I'm not an expert judge, so I could've made a mistake, but I can explain how I've interpreted the rules. On the leap with a balance and precision deduction, I took the balance deduction for a lack of control on the landing (this was an older video; I would probably say lack of control now). She hits the ground and is not in full control, so she kind of spins out quickly after the leap on one leg. The precision deduction is taken when the gymnast isn't on 180° or 360° from their point of takeoff, either if they over or under rotate. Here, given how her foot was oriented at takeoff, she landed a bit under rotated, which in my eyes was a precision deduction (somewhat strict). I'm glad you liked the video! :D
Cool routine and fits well with the music. Second pass looks insane! Leap was kind of short though?
I hate that it's basically impossible to avoid precision and balance deductions on leaps with two foot landings and turns
Yeah, and wolf turns are the ones that people get away with the most! ;-; Especially with leaps, I feel like the precision deductions are annoying -- I kind of wish FIG would do something to reward people more for doing super difficult leaps.
@@GymAnalysis well I kinda like the precision and / or balance deduction because gymnast are discouraged to do leaps that they just try to wing it and put in all their might just to get it around. Larisa actually gets away with the precision deduction where there’s choreography out of the gogean which makes it seem very controlled. I believe the precision and balance deductions works in favour of the Chinese considering they’ve been doing their leaps really well for the past decade especially their switch halves
@@bryanthan9363 All true! It's tough for the code to balance quality of elements without being too strict. I do like that the precision deductions, when taken fairly, give a bonus to competitors with clean dance elements.
@@GymAnalysis exactly, I feel like the Chinese has spent so much time trying to perfect dance elements and not do skills that are not perfect and this somewhat disadvantaged them over the past few quads cause deductions were far too lenient previously
How many time the whip can be used
Can you do Morgan?
I might upload her new routine from the American Cup :D
Doamne, ce a devenit gimnastica, o sumă de cifre?! Probabil, într-un viitor mai mult sau mai puțin îndepărtat, arbitrii vor fi înlocuiți de un calculator sau un robot care sa calculeze scorul.😁
I feel like this routine could get up to -0,1 for lack of variety in corners three times? O_O She starts every tumbling pass in the same way, judges are obsessed with these little things.
I never got the hype on this girl. I feel like a lot of people like gymnasts from other Countries just because they want to see them succeed (especially this girl because Romania let her get away) but that was a beautiful triple turn with the leg up and the "bobble" deduction you gave her was harsh.
What hype? She's always been underscored. This is her first FX final ever and besides some UB final some time ago (pre injury) she never ranked high. Shame,because she is just amazing.
And this is exactly why I start to dislike the sport. 'Low chest' on her double pike? 'balance' deductions? Waaaaay too many deductions for something that looks so great.