Hi there, I saw your video of the 18-50 Sigma, and I would like to ask, how u compare this one with Sigma in "A-Focus" and Quality vs this Tamron? And have u ever tested the 16-55 from Sony?
I haven’t used the Sony 16-55 so I can’t really compare them. But the sigma 18-50 f2.8 is a really sharp and solid lens. If you asking about the tamron 17-70 f2.8 then I’d have to say it’s very similar to the sigma but it has internal stabilization and a more versatile focal range. I really like both of these lenses just depends on which one fits your needs better
I no longer have that tamron lens but it would be a great combo with the a6700! I made this video with that lens and the a7iv though ua-cam.com/video/Cf-yZnOkoNo/v-deo.html
@@KatzHartz I mostly shoot raw because I know I’m going to edit them. You can add presets to jpegs but you might have to adjust the intensity of the preset. The more heavy lifting the preset has to do the more likely that jpegs will start to fall apart
I usually expose to the highlights to preserve them and then edit the photos in Lightroom. If I wasn’t planning on editing them then I would normally expose to +0.0 in camera.
Just got my a6700 this last weekend with the kit lens really enjoy it but ordered the tamron 17-70 over the sigma 18-50 i couldnt pass up on the extra 20 mm 😅
Thank for the video kyle. Can you tell me if the stabilization of the cam and of the lens (tamron 17-70) is enought to stabilized a video? Of is better to buy a gimbal. Thank!
@@alessioragghianti4462 it’s really good. I barely use my gimbal anymore. Obviously in some situations you might need a gimbal but that would be for more extreme situations or when you need it to be very stabilized
Would you say the a6700 does pretty well in low light? At least compared to a full frame? I want a camera that does well on low light but can’t afford a full frame
Great video! Where did you get those labeled lens caps? I’ve seen them in several videos and I think you mentioned them in one but I can’t seem to find it.
Both great lenses. The tamron has stabilization on it so that’s a plus. If you plan to move to full frame at some point go with the sigma. Just a heads up though, the sigma is a pretty heavy lens and makes it pretty front heavy with the a6xxx cameras
Great video! Any thoughts on pairing the a6700 with a 24-70mm FF? Because I am a notorious zoomer, I think I’d love this length, especially considering the crop factor but I have no options to test it before buying it first 🫠
@@o.k.7673 yes. It’s a great combo. I have the sigma 24-70 and I love this focal range on an apsc camera. I did a video with it on the a6400 in New Orleans and the photos speak for themselves
I ran to New Orleans! Amazing video - so helpful in my decision making! Loved to see the photos beside the actual distances. It’s exactly what I am looking for! Thx
Is it safe to assume you can use a lot of the Sony full frame lenses on APS-C bodies? I want to start my photography journey with an APS-C body and lens, then gradually move on to full frame if I don’t lose interest in the hobby.
The full frame lenses will always work on the apsc bodies. Some apsc lenses can work on full frame bodies with some post cropping or using the super35 settings.
Great video. I have a 6400 im thinking of upgrading from. I think its going to be worth it. Already have that Tamron and a F4 70-200. Yea, the 2.8 is better but still an awesome lens on the aps-c body. Just ordered the 10-18 Sigma with believe will be great on this as well. I tried doing video on the 6400 but with no IBIS its a real chore to try to get useful video. Thats a big reason I want this. Thanks
@@rzrdaze yea. The a6700 is a pretty big upgrade having the ibis. It’s actually probably the most stable looking footage in active stabilization than any of the other Sony cameras in active. I just got the sigma 10-18 as well and it’s so good
![Tamron 17-70 F2.8 vs Sigma 18-50 F2.8 Lens Comparison | Best APS-C Zoom Lens for Sony [A6400, A6700]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/nZA_J1t3eac/mqdefault.jpg)
![Tamron 17-70 F2.8 vs Sigma 18-50 F2.8 Lens Comparison | Best APS-C Zoom Lens for Sony [A6400, A6700]](/img/tr.png)
Hi there, I saw your video of the 18-50 Sigma, and I would like to ask, how u compare this one with Sigma in "A-Focus" and Quality vs this Tamron? And have u ever tested the 16-55 from Sony?
Curious which of the two you ended up going with?
Curious which of the two you ended up going with?
I haven’t used the Sony 16-55 so I can’t really compare them. But the sigma 18-50 f2.8 is a really sharp and solid lens. If you asking about the tamron 17-70 f2.8 then I’d have to say it’s very similar to the sigma but it has internal stabilization and a more versatile focal range. I really like both of these lenses just depends on which one fits your needs better
A6700 with tamron 35-150 f2-2.8 pls 😁
I no longer have that tamron lens but it would be a great combo with the a6700!
I made this video with that lens and the a7iv though
ua-cam.com/video/Cf-yZnOkoNo/v-deo.html
Did you shoot in RAW or JPEGS? If RAW, do your presets work on JPEGS?
@@KatzHartz I mostly shoot raw because I know I’m going to edit them. You can add presets to jpegs but you might have to adjust the intensity of the preset. The more heavy lifting the preset has to do the more likely that jpegs will start to fall apart
What’s happening when you show the more exposed version of the photo you took? Did the camera take that, or is that something from post production?
I know... he takes them really dark then he turns up the shadows!! WTF??!
I usually expose to the highlights to preserve them and then edit the photos in Lightroom. If I wasn’t planning on editing them then I would normally expose to +0.0 in camera.
Just got my a6700 this last weekend with the kit lens really enjoy it but ordered the tamron 17-70 over the sigma 18-50 i couldnt pass up on the extra 20 mm 😅
@@JayWithDaBee can’t really go wrong with either but the tamron is also stabilized so that’s a bonus
Thank for the video kyle. Can you tell me if the stabilization of the cam and of the lens (tamron 17-70) is enought to stabilized a video? Of is better to buy a gimbal. Thank!
@@alessioragghianti4462 it’s really good. I barely use my gimbal anymore. Obviously in some situations you might need a gimbal but that would be for more extreme situations or when you need it to be very stabilized
Would you say the a6700 does pretty well in low light? At least compared to a full frame? I want a camera that does well on low light but can’t afford a full frame
Same question
Running a s-30mm14 and can’t get enough of this thing
Love the sigma 30mm!
4:49 how many photos per second? I have read that 11 frames per second but it does not look like this
@@kamilwisniewski1300 I believe it is 11fps with a max of 59 raw in a row
Any issues with video? Seeing reports of problem with in body ibis and the VC in the lens. Would I be better off with the sigma 18-50?
No issues that I’ve had. The sigma is also really nice too though
Looks orange , why?
debating if I should get the 70-200 now or wait until they release one for APSC - what are you thoughts?
I doubt they would make a 70-200 specifically for apsc. There is a sigma 70-200 they came out recently that’s about half the price though
Photos are so crisp! May I ask what camera are you using for the POV and are you using a chest mount/harness? Thank you!
Yes it’s a chest mount harness and it’s the DJI Osmo action 4 camera.
Would it be worth upgrading from the ZV E10?
It’s a pretty big upgrade especially in the video side of the camera. Also the autofocus is straight from Sonys new $6,000 camera and it’s really good
Great video! Where did you get those labeled lens caps? I’ve seen them in several videos and I think you mentioned them in one but I can’t seem to find it.
alphagvrd.com/products/rear-lens-cap-skins-with-focal-length-indicator?_pos=1&_sid=5f94f1aae&_ss=r
What event is this is NYC I live here never seen this lol im so lost lol
Chinese new year
I have Sony a6000.
Would you recommend this Tamron 17-70 or Sigma 24-70 Art?
thank you so much!
Both great lenses. The tamron has stabilization on it so that’s a plus. If you plan to move to full frame at some point go with the sigma. Just a heads up though, the sigma is a pretty heavy lens and makes it pretty front heavy with the a6xxx cameras
@@KyleWattsTV Thank you for your response. I have been enjoying a6000 pretty much so I’ll go with Tamron. Subscribed!
great stuff and pics! how did you find it with high iso? i noticed your iso was generally quite low
Could I use this to do talking head stuff like vlogging or streaming myself talk?
Hello, what camera wrist strap is that? Looking for one for my a6700 😬
Peak design wrist strap
@@KyleWattsTV got it, thanks!
How do i edit in Lightroom “Tutorial “?. You’re editing is insane 👌🏾
Thank you so much!
great video kyle!
Great video! Any thoughts on pairing the a6700 with a 24-70mm FF? Because I am a notorious zoomer, I think I’d love this length, especially considering the crop factor but I have no options to test it before buying it first 🫠
@@o.k.7673 yes. It’s a great combo. I have the sigma 24-70 and I love this focal range on an apsc camera. I did a video with it on the a6400 in New Orleans and the photos speak for themselves
I ran to New Orleans! Amazing video - so helpful in my decision making! Loved to see the photos beside the actual distances. It’s exactly what I am looking for! Thx
Was this Chinese new year celebration?
Yup!
@@KyleWattsTV😇
Is it safe to assume you can use a lot of the Sony full frame lenses on APS-C bodies? I want to start my photography journey with an APS-C body and lens, then gradually move on to full frame if I don’t lose interest in the hobby.
The full frame lenses will always work on the apsc bodies. Some apsc lenses can work on full frame bodies with some post cropping or using the super35 settings.
How is the bokeh of this? I like this type of lens but i like sigma 56 1.4 too for portrait. But this tamron is all in one lens with 2.8
It’s pretty good. It’s definitely not gonna be an obvious as that f1.4 lens
How is this camera with flash photography
Sigma 18-50 or 30mm ??
I would go for the 18-50 for versatility but that 30 is a great lens as well
Your set just looks dang good….
Thanks Paul
@@KyleWattsTV man those fireworks seemed like gun fire. Man I want that 70-200 lol 😂 great room patio. Less than a week bro!
Does Lightroom support RAW files?
Yes
Great video. I have a 6400 im thinking of upgrading from. I think its going to be worth it. Already have that Tamron and a F4 70-200. Yea, the 2.8 is better but still an awesome lens on the aps-c body. Just ordered the 10-18 Sigma with believe will be great on this as well. I tried doing video on the 6400 but with no IBIS its a real chore to try to get useful video. Thats a big reason I want this. Thanks
@@rzrdaze yea. The a6700 is a pretty big upgrade having the ibis. It’s actually probably the most stable looking footage in active stabilization than any of the other Sony cameras in active. I just got the sigma 10-18 as well and it’s so good
Pics turned out great!!
Nice camera