The Tape REVEALS What REALLY HAPPENED In The CONTROVERSIAL Call In Raiders Vs Chiefs

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 12 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,1 тис.

  • @donaldwatkins5438
    @donaldwatkins5438 11 днів тому +188

    I am a high school football official, not a professional official, and let me tell you, this is really not that hard. The line judge threw his flag, blew his whistle, ran onto the field with a "kill the clock" signal, and began twirling his arms indicating he saw a "false start." That is a "pre-snap" penalty and a DEAD BALL FOUL. Which means that play was over BEFORE it really began. Anything that occurs after that official's whistle is blown-including fumbles, is FOREVER null and void. The officials absolutely, 100%, cannot, ever get in a huddle and overrule a blown whistle. The infraction was indeed an illegal shift; HOWEVER, the line judge blew the whistle BEFORE the snap. Play over! Fumble nullified. Raiders' football. The Raiders got screwed. Btw, I have no horse in this race. Not a Raiders fan.

    • @motogravel
      @motogravel 11 днів тому +24

      100% accurate here. Blown whistle = dead ball. Either False Start or Erroneous Whistle. Either way, Raiders maintain possession.

    • @Navigator001
      @Navigator001 11 днів тому +10

      Thank you, I've been saying this, but I couldn't have said it better than you did.

    • @chieframbo1
      @chieframbo1 11 днів тому +24

      There was no whistle BEFORE the snap.

    • @motogravel
      @motogravel 11 днів тому +6

      @ a False Start whistle doesn’t need to be before the snap and very often isn’t. Also, erroneous whistle negates the play - also doesn’t need to be prior to the snap

    • @donaldwatkins5438
      @donaldwatkins5438 11 днів тому +11

      @ There HAD to be a whistle before the snap. A false start penalty is by definition a PRE-snap penalty. Therefore the play was over before the snap. Not that difficult.

  • @miggysmollz
    @miggysmollz 12 днів тому +58

    Reminds me of the 2021 playoff game raiders vs bengals. Refs blew the play dead but the td still counted

    • @user-jz5cf9ob5h
      @user-jz5cf9ob5h 11 днів тому +4

      EXACTLY

    • @raideralexofficial
      @raideralexofficial  11 днів тому +7

      Yeah Raiders got screwed there too!!

    • @kenamaro3942
      @kenamaro3942 11 днів тому +6

      I was waiting for someone to bring that one up.
      They robbed the raiders of a playoff game...all this time later and Im still pissed off over that.

    • @atllzable
      @atllzable 11 днів тому +2

      Exactly..!!!

    • @dougroux73
      @dougroux73 11 днів тому +6

      I didn't hear a whistle till after the recovery. the call was correct. it wasn't a false start. illegal shift, 2 people not set when ball is hiked. wide receiver and tight end were not set. ugly way to lose, but it was a Raider mistake

  • @JV-tj3hy
    @JV-tj3hy 11 днів тому +27

    Yes he's calling a false start. But look at the other side of the field. The ref on that side threw a flag as well (you can see it in the air at 1:50) for a false start on the other outside receiver. Neither outside receiver came set for 1 second prior to the snap. BY RULE, if you have 2 eligible players in motion at the snap, it is NO LONGER A FALSE START. The penalty becomes illegal shift, and the penalty for ILLEGAL SHIFT, does not kill the play. Your argument about the whistle, 100% valid, but to argue the call on the field. They made the correct call. Now, had the flag been on a lineman and an eligible receiver, it would have reverted to a false start and the play would've been dead at the snap. But it was 2 eligible receivers in motion

    • @edv8064
      @edv8064 11 днів тому +3

      Thank you!! This video is crazier than the jfk assasination video…😂😂😂

    • @jonldavis
      @jonldavis 10 днів тому +3

      Does any of that matter if the whistle was blown?

    • @brucehansen7949
      @brucehansen7949 10 днів тому

      ​@@jonldavisjust stupid fanboys trying to justify the NFL not being rigged when it clearly is

    • @deannash1472
      @deannash1472 10 днів тому +1

      @@jonldavis Yes, b/c if it was an inadvertent (or premature) whistle and the play results in a clear recovery by one team, the turnover stands.

    • @jonldavis
      @jonldavis 10 днів тому

      @@deannash1472 That is a stupid rule cause now you don't know if you should stop playing or not after the whistle sounds.

  • @mattclark3385
    @mattclark3385 12 днів тому +96

    Nfl officiating is horrid

    • @raideralexofficial
      @raideralexofficial  12 днів тому +7

      It’s awful

    • @theartistformerlyknownasth8612
      @theartistformerlyknownasth8612 12 днів тому +11

      OR football fan knowledge of rules is horrid

    • @starship2023
      @starship2023 12 днів тому +5

      Learn the damn rules

    • @hillsane9262
      @hillsane9262 12 днів тому +5

      @starship2023 when the whistle is blown play can continue? OK got it.

    • @theartistformerlyknownasth8612
      @theartistformerlyknownasth8612 12 днів тому

      @hillsane9262 only in a continuous action
      So as in the player is diving on the ball as the whistle blows, if the whistle was later determined to be in error or overturned , then the possession change stands
      If the ball is loose and nobody is going for it and everyone is walking back to their sides and a player runs over and grabs the ball, that's not a fumble

  • @biggie6181
    @biggie6181 12 днів тому +101

    We wouldn’t even had been in that position if Carlson makes 1 of 3 FGs. Can’t leave it in refs hands 🤷🏾‍♂️

    • @raideralexofficial
      @raideralexofficial  12 днів тому +20

      True but still annoying asf to see games being won from calls from the officials

    • @biggie6181
      @biggie6181 12 днів тому +2

      @ Yea True 💯

    • @mikeavila6921
      @mikeavila6921 12 днів тому +2

      Facts

    • @DavidSmith-vg2bn
      @DavidSmith-vg2bn 12 днів тому +3

      Rigged AF Raiders robbed

    • @starship2023
      @starship2023 12 днів тому +7

      ​@@raideralexofficialThey didn't get refs help There was no false start so they changed it to the right call and they didn't blow the whistle tell after the fumble recovery also Worthy caught that pass but they called it incomplete he could've ran 10 yards pretty much no defender near but since they did that he got put were he caught it after review and 3rd down instead of a 1st causing us to kick a field goal

  • @dachief4263
    @dachief4263 12 днів тому +49

    Bro if the WR is moving while the ball is hike its illegal shift

    • @mosesluevanos3159
      @mosesluevanos3159 12 днів тому +12

      There not saying it wasn’t the problem was the ref blowing the play dead 😂

    • @steelvipers1835
      @steelvipers1835 11 днів тому +2

      Your exactly right. I really wish everyone would stop crying and making it about the Chiefs. Its pathetic refereeing it happens every week in just about every game. The nfl just doesn't seem to care.

    • @Boujeekorc
      @Boujeekorc 11 днів тому +5

      He could say “we deserved to win that game” and have been 100% correct. But no, he goes to making up some conspiracy theory about collusion between the chiefs and the refs and a phantom whistle all while clearly not understanding the basic rules of the game. This is a fantastic post from a 🤡

    • @heyyyyitsjeff
      @heyyyyitsjeff 11 днів тому +7

      @@mosesluevanos3159and then they talked and he realized that you can’t call a dead ball on a stopped clock. Which they spiked it the play before.

    • @goldiego1
      @goldiego1 11 днів тому +14

      READ AND KNOW THE RULES. The Raiders spiked the ball on the previous play to stop the clock. Therefore, on the next play, the illegal shift is now, per the rules, a LIVE BALL FOUL. They are to wait until the ball is secured. That is why the whistle does not sound until after Bolton is on the ball. Had the clock been running then the play would have been blown dead. This is why KC this time got the ball. Nothing more. Haters!

  • @colleenc9286
    @colleenc9286 12 днів тому +65

    Guaranteed if it was the chefs with the ball they would play it over

  • @retroprojections
    @retroprojections 12 днів тому +18

    Both WRs, the TE, and the QB were all moving when the ball was snapped..
    Kinda hard to tell, but the play clock was about to expire, so there's that penalty as well...
    Wasn't a false start, wasn't blown dead. Raiders just blew it.

    • @djshowtimekansascity4854
      @djshowtimekansascity4854 12 днів тому

      If the player wasn't moving forward it's not false start... he was moving side to side so that's illegal shift.. play on.. hard to tell if whistle was blown cuz that would blow it dead

    • @retroprojections
      @retroprojections 12 днів тому +3

      @djshowtimekansascity4854 it could not be a false start, as the raiders never got into a set position in the first place. False starts only happen AFTER all players have gotten into their stance.. that never happened, but multiple players were moving.
      Which makes it an illegal shift.

    • @raideralexofficial
      @raideralexofficial  12 днів тому +3

      But you can clearly see the ref blew the whistle and blew the play dead

    • @retroprojections
      @retroprojections 12 днів тому +8

      @@raideralexofficial but you can't "see" sound.

    • @vihtoripuurola3775
      @vihtoripuurola3775 12 днів тому +1

      @@raideralexofficial Yet they played on. The refs got it right in the end. I have no skin in this game, but the center snapped the ball and here we are.

  • @darchocolate31
    @darchocolate31 12 днів тому +16

    "Under 2 minutes, if the offense never gets set before the snap, it's a false start IF AND ONLY IF the clock is running. If that clock is stopped, as it was here, then it's an illegal shift and a live ball foul and the play continues."Kirk Herbstreit
    Stop with the disingenuous takes. This was not a controversial decision. It is literally the rules.

    • @davetrayford
      @davetrayford 11 днів тому

      Bravo !

    • @Navigator001
      @Navigator001 11 днів тому +3

      If the Ref made a mistake and called the play dead, then the correct call would have been there was an inadvertent whistle that stopped the play, There was an actual infraction of illegal line shift. Penalty of 5 or 10 yards, replay the down.

    • @Jumpingoffthecliff
      @Jumpingoffthecliff 11 днів тому +1

      @@Navigator001 read the rules, in the case of fumbles plays are allowed to continue AFTER the whistle until a clear recovery is made. ARTICLE 4. AWARDING POSSESSION

    • @Navigator001
      @Navigator001 11 днів тому +1

      @@Jumpingoffthecliff I haven't read it, but if the play is called dead, then there is no fumble.

    • @wacowarpony7422
      @wacowarpony7422 9 днів тому +1

      He threw the flag before the ball was snapped...then came running in while blowing the play dead..say what ever you want, you must not understand that when a play is blown dead, it doesn't count..You can't come back and then say the play counted, even though the play was blown dead..🤣 In other words, dont be stupid too!

  • @jackkenna696
    @jackkenna696 12 днів тому +21

    Great take! You showed the ref signaled false start by the ref. In reality it looked like illegal formation.

    • @raideralexofficial
      @raideralexofficial  12 днів тому +1

      NFL refs are getting ridiculous

    • @MrJetmech
      @MrJetmech 12 днів тому +7

      It was NOT a false start. You cannot have a false start with the clock not running

    • @theartistformerlyknownasth8612
      @theartistformerlyknownasth8612 12 днів тому +7

      refs make the wrong signals all the time, they literally called a penalty against the chiefs earlier in the game when it was against the raiders
      by your logic, the penalty had to stay against the chiefs because the refs said so

    • @MrJetmech
      @MrJetmech 12 днів тому +1

      @@theartistformerlyknownasth8612 so.....Lets just say since they make the wrong calls all the time that we should go with your take whenever you feel like it was the wrong call. That will clear up any controversy don't you think?

    • @theartistformerlyknownasth8612
      @theartistformerlyknownasth8612 12 днів тому +3

      @@MrJetmech no, I'm saying basing your entire opinion off of what one side judge is doing is stupid
      Side judges get things wrong, their word isn't set in stone not even after they announce it
      The refs literally called a penalty on the chiefs in the 1st half that was supposed to be against the raiders
      They redid the whole punt
      It's not like a ref says something and it just becomes law

  • @jedcooper443
    @jedcooper443 12 днів тому +8

    Every year the refs make bogus calls!!

  • @jeffpadilla9891
    @jeffpadilla9891 12 днів тому +9

    Raiders should have kicked the field goal on the third down, they blew it nobody else.

    • @elviracatherinetalaoc2070
      @elviracatherinetalaoc2070 11 днів тому

      I agree. with you.

    • @kennyhiggins7806
      @kennyhiggins7806 11 днів тому

      @@elviracatherinetalaoc2070 I too wondered why they didn’t kick it on 3rd down. It has happened to the Chiefs!

  • @mikemorgan5015
    @mikemorgan5015 10 днів тому +9

    Too many folks getting off in the weeds on this. So, I'll break it down from my perspective. The All 22 here makes half of this really easy. The rest must be seen and heard on other videos.
    1. The false start argument.
    For a false start to occur, the player must have first assumed a set position for a full second. (rule 7 sec 4 art 2) There are at least 3 players who weren't EVER set at all. The 2 WRs and the TE. They were still up and moving when the ball was snapped. Since they never GOT SET, it's not a false start, it's an illegal shift. (rule 7 sec 4 art 6). Slow it down and let me know how many players you can count who are still moving when the snap occurs. Were they set before they moved? If not, it's not a false start. Rule 7 sec 4 art 2 item 6 does not apply, as the clock was not running.
    2. The official at the top blew the play dead argument. No whistle in any of the dozens of clips with audio can be heard until after KC has recovered the fumbled snap. When they start, they are clear and audible. Please provide evidence of a whistle prior to that. You can't ASSUME that he blew it if you can't hear it. If the parabolic mics can't pick it up, it didn't happen.
    3. The linesman killed the play and his signal is THE call argument. Anything the linesman at the top does, running, waving, signaling, etc means nothing without a whistle. It's only his portion of the overall play. He is relaying that he saw someone false start, yet no whistle is heard. He comes running in waving his arms and signals what HE saw. THIS PART IS MY TAKE: The white hat shut down the false start because so many players never got set in the first place as they are required to do and were still moving at the snap. The white hat got everyone's take on it and made a decision based on the input from the entire crew and his own observations. Which based on the evidence in the All 22 here and the HD broadcast replays and live audio, was correct.
    Bottom line, it all comes down to the whistle or absence thereof. If you got a whistle, inadvertent whistle, play stops Raiders ball but no guaranteed FG. No whistle, no case the final call was correct. Feel free to flame away on this take. If you got that whistle, I want hear it.
    This entire scenario plays out in under 4 seconds. It helps to use the speed controls by clicking the gear symbol at the bottom of the video window.
    And for those saying the refs always favor the Chiefs, show me a late game deciding call that helped the Chiefs win that was wrong. If you don't want penalties deciding games, stop committing penalties. There are some examples of pretty egregiously bad calls that decided games in the past. This ain't one of em. Unless you can show me that false start whistle.

    • @jimmurphy834
      @jimmurphy834 9 днів тому +3

      That's neat. You left out something though. The side judge on the Raiders sideline immediately vacated his position running to the center of the field.
      Show or give one example where a side judge vacates the sideline he is officiating during a live play.
      Per player safety protocols, NFL side judge officials only enter the field of play during a dead ball situation. Inadvertent whistle included. So based on your take why did the visitor side judge throw a flag, run onto the field, place arm and hand by mouth, signal kil the clock with arms over his head, then signal false start? Did he screw up? Yes. It's still a dead ball due to his actions be it audible or not.

    • @BeepBeep1981
      @BeepBeep1981 9 днів тому

      ​​@@jimmurphy834Fuckin' wow. Imagine botching a snap, fumbling the ball, turning the ball over, and having the refs make the CORRECT CALL by the book on a potential FG attempt that was damn near impossible for your kicker to even make anyways because he didn't have the leg to even make it to the goal posts on anything 50+ yards all day (it would of been a 55 yarder if you got your way and refs cheated the Chiefs out of the fumble recovery)... Yet you STILL somehow blame the refs. 😂😂😂😂
      Can't make this kind of stupid up. You people are brainwashed.

    • @donaldwatkins5438
      @donaldwatkins5438 9 днів тому +1

      @@jimmurphy834 Bravo! As an official, I couldn't have said it better myself. The problem with many who are commenting-especially Chiefs fans- is that they don't understand the mechanics and rules of officiating a football game. It takes much more to officiate a game than it does just to cheer for your team. Many people are really putting too much into the "no one heard a whistle" argument. They don't understand that calling a penalty is visual as well as audio. A BIG YELLOW FLAG doesn't make any sound when it has been thrown, but is there any doubt that a penalty has just been called? Twirling arms signaling "false start" don't make any noise. But is there any doubt that a false start has been called?

    • @davetrayford
      @davetrayford 9 днів тому +1

      Absolutely !!

    • @mikemorgan5015
      @mikemorgan5015 8 днів тому

      @@jimmurphy834 This means nothing. Show me in the rule book where an official vacating his position stops play. He is signaling "Illegal Formation, BTW" a live ball foul. Same signal.

  • @yesfan3942
    @yesfan3942 4 дні тому +1

    This sort of stuff has been happening for years. The NFL is an entertainment firm and it's all about bettings today. Look how much things have changed over the years. We didn't have all this crazy gambling tied so close to the NFL untill lately. It has been and will always be about money of course. Decisions made by bad refs are a part of the game. They (NFL) wants a new winning team like the Patriots were for years. This was a bad call to help the KC chiefs. Patrick will be the new Brady. Now with so much on line gambling with the games, I've noticed how many very close games there are now, which add for the bettings lines. It's really sad now and I rarely watch any games because of it. I did see this ending live though and it is SO obvious.

  • @starship2023
    @starship2023 12 днів тому +5

    You should've attempted a 76 yard FG attempt against the wind like you guys did back in 08 against the Chargers

    • @raideralexofficial
      @raideralexofficial  12 днів тому

      I remember that game lmooo lane kiffin was fuckin with Al Davis

    • @starship2023
      @starship2023 11 днів тому

      Who knows with some the werid things that happened this season it might somehow work

  • @shanimal1969
    @shanimal1969 8 днів тому

    This is exactly what I thought I saw while watching the game and have been waiting for someone to break it down. Thank you!

  • @Jumpingoffthecliff
    @Jumpingoffthecliff 11 днів тому +6

    The center hiked the ball starting the play. End of story. You see the back judge immediately throw the fumble marker. Unless you can match the whistle, allegedly blown to the play's video, it's moot. Here's an idea, don't hike the football when the QB isn't ready. Problem solved.

    • @brucehansen7949
      @brucehansen7949 10 днів тому

      Dude millions of us seen it life and the ref definitely blew the whistle... Do you realize how easy it is for the NFL to edit out the whistle sound? And none of the replays wanna show that same ref in it, it's damage control.... The NFL is scripted like WWE... And the chiefs MUST WIN. If I were in a state that gambling was legalized I'd be fucking loaded this year

    • @brucehansen7949
      @brucehansen7949 10 днів тому

      I would of bet on every game besides bills cuz they actually are good... The chiefs suck dick but win every game cuz of the refs

    • @ronaldbrown4723
      @ronaldbrown4723 10 днів тому

      ​@@brucehansen7949I bet you was at the game . Get real

  • @echohotel4963
    @echohotel4963 12 днів тому +72

    Raiders fumble, Chiefs recover, whistle is blown, play ends. Chiefs win. I'm missing the controversy here other than angry fans making shit up or trying to twist the timeline of events in the play. The recovery was made prior to the whistle being blown. That is because they don't whistle a play dead when it's an illegal shift.

    • @mosesluevanos3159
      @mosesluevanos3159 12 днів тому +8

      If it was just the fans the media wouldn’t have been saying it either lol it’s yall delusional fans that think this way is the problem

    • @supermike215
      @supermike215 11 днів тому +39

      The play was blown dead not to mention the ref signaled false start which is a five yard penalty raiders ball still.

    • @ac-kt9td
      @ac-kt9td 11 днів тому +18

      @@supermike215 post a link to a video where you can hear a whistle before the chiefs recover the ball..... I'll wait.

    • @JEYA-nm4jl
      @JEYA-nm4jl 11 днів тому +18

      Thinking you need to read football for dummies to understand the rules, dude, whistle blown dead before the fumble

    • @ac-kt9td
      @ac-kt9td 11 днів тому +9

      @@JEYA-nm4jl post the link. I've watched multiple. No whistle is heard before the chiefs recover.

  • @glenlyn52
    @glenlyn52 11 днів тому +4

    In the final 2 minutes false start is only called when the clock is running. Raiders spiked the ball to stop the clock. Illegal shift was because offense players were still moving when the ball was snapped. Play doesn't get blown dead on a live ball illegal shift foul. Chiefs recovered the live ball and declined the illigal shift penalty. Case closed...except for dummies.

    • @brlyjo
      @brlyjo 11 днів тому

      In the final two minutes false start is only called when the clock is running?

    • @glenlyn52
      @glenlyn52 11 днів тому

      @@brlyjo Correct. There can be no false start in that situation unless the clock is already running. If the raiders didn't have to stop the clock by spiking the ball on the previous play the false start that the line judge was signalling would have been correct. The line judge was overruled in conference by the other officials. He either forgot the 2 minutes rule, or didn't know it, or forgot the clock wasn't running when the ball was snapped. The ruling on the play was illegal shift because the wideout was in motion when the ball was snapped. Chiefs decllined the penalty because they recovered the ball and taking a knee was all they needed to win the game..

  • @debbiejohnson4651
    @debbiejohnson4651 9 днів тому +1

    Raider Alex, you have it wrong on many counts.
    1. The ref at the top of the screen was IN ERROR. He was trying to call "false start", which doesn't apply in this case. A false start occurs when everyone on the offense is set and then a player moves BEFORE the ball is snapped (one player in the backfield is allowed to move sideways or backward). In this case, multiple offensive players are moving while the ball is being snapped (because the ball was snapped early). This is an illegal shift (multiple players moving at the snap), which is a live ball foul and play must continue. The ref who called a false start was confused and made the wrong call--he was corrected after the other refs called a meeting after the fumble. Since it's a live ball found (not a dead ball foul) play continues.
    2. We don't know when the ref who made the wrong call blew a whistle, but that doesn't matter. No one on the field reacted to the whistle because they couldn't hear the whistle (everyone was diving for the loose ball). The whistle, if it was blown, didn't affect the play on the field.
    3. You say it's a stupid that the outcome of a game is determined by some stupid rule. You're stupid. If there aren't rules, the game wouldn't be a game and nobody would watch. It would be some kind of chaotic free-for-all. The Raiders should know the rules and follow them if they want to win. They were just undisciplined on their most important play.

  • @alexguild
    @alexguild 12 днів тому +12

    Coaches did not get play in, line gets confused and shifts Happened [one judges mistakenly calls false start but is overuled] . This all Happen because the coaching staff blow a time out earlier and they force the team into more of a hurry up. Coaches wanted to run another play instead of Just kicking for the win.

    • @Robert-fs6ge
      @Robert-fs6ge 11 днів тому +2

      All the time? I've seen thousands of games and never seen it before. False start call killed the play immediately

    • @glenlyn52
      @glenlyn52 11 днів тому

      @@Robert-fs6ge In the final 2 minutes false start is only called when the clock is running. Raiders spiked the ball to stop the clock. Clock started when the ball was snapped. Illegal shift was because offense players were still moving when the ball was snapped. Play doesn't get blown dead on a live ball illegal shift foul. Chiefs recovered the live ball and declined the illigal shift penalty.

    • @5IveNDlme
      @5IveNDlme 11 днів тому

      @@glenlyn52the ref unfortunately made the mistake of blowing the whistle, so it messes up your explanation because players effort, what they do is effected by the whistle. Make sense?

    • @darryldworak6356
      @darryldworak6356 11 днів тому

      @@glenlyn52iv seen in the past mistake or not a play was blown dead either way they are changing things to favor the chiefs you can call it whatever you want

    • @deannash1472
      @deannash1472 10 днів тому

      And, why were they running another play at all. No timeouts, 14 seconds left and at the edge of FG range. Aidan said they were going to just throw an incomplete pass to waste time. That's a huge risk of a disaster--a penalty, with or without a 10 second runoff, some how the ball is downed in play with no time for a FG, a turnover, etc. Pierce should have to answer that question--why were they even taking that risk to waste 3-4 seconds.

  • @mikemorgan5015
    @mikemorgan5015 10 днів тому +2

    I have been waiting the the All 22. Thank you! This shows at least 4 players not set at the snap. All players on the LOS MUST BE SET for a full second prior to the snap. So even more fall into that category here. Both WRs, TE, and QB at least. I have watched about 20 videos of this and have yet to hear a whistle until Bolton recovers the ball and is down my contact. Let me know if you find one with a whistle before that. The official is only signaling what HE saw. There were at least 4 players not set. On a dead clock, that's an illegal shift. Had it been a running clock, it would have been a false start. Strange but true. For those disbelievers, find a good video with sound and click play with your eyes closed and click pause as soon as you hear a whistle. I think you'll be surprised to see the KC player in the fetal position cradling the ball. EDIT: Lots of folks CLAIMING the running ref blew his whistle. Nothing proves a whistle was blown but the sound of one being blown. Show me that footage with sound. The broadcast footage is abundantly clear when the whistles start and there are several that come in, but none until after the fumble is recovered. Prove me wrong and I'll concede.

    • @davetrayford
      @davetrayford 8 днів тому

      ABSOLUTELY TRUE ! The TV VIDEO clearly indicates what you and I witnessed in "real time". The play was correctly officiated and Raiders screwed it up and Chiefs won !

    • @Brent-r8j
      @Brent-r8j 5 днів тому

      @@mikemorgan5015 watch the video closely then line judge throws the flag puts his hand to his mouth then waves the hands in the air as he’s running on the field signals false start every referee blows the whistle before waving the play dead in which that’s what happened granted the penalty was an illegal shift but the play and fumble was nullified as soon as the line judge called the play dead for false start even tho it wasn’t it was a illegal shift but it’s and inadvertent whistle dead ball play…end of story it was still raiders ball

    • @Brent-r8j
      @Brent-r8j 5 днів тому

      @@mikemorgan5015 it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to know that after a ref blows the play dead they wave there hands In the air signaling play is dead and look no further cuz it clearly shows that in this video and if u can’t see that then get ur eyes checked I don’t think he sucked his thumb then waved his hands in the air and ran on the field without blowing his whistle line judges have to blow there whistle to leave there position to blow the play dead

    • @Brent-r8j
      @Brent-r8j 5 днів тому

      @@mikemorgan5015 I’m just curious how many line judges throw a flag calling for a false start and don’t blow there whistle that’s the dumbest thing I’ve ever hear every referee who throws a flag for a false start blows there whistle because it’s called by the line judge everytime think about it u ever seen a false start called where the referee throws the flag and won’t blow a whistle cuz I have yet to see that happen

    • @mikemorgan5015
      @mikemorgan5015 5 днів тому

      @@Brent-r8j Ok, Brent. How do you KNOW he was calling a false start?

  • @myhoodiskc
    @myhoodiskc 12 днів тому +6

    the ball is recovered before the ref has his hand to his mouth for a whistle. Cant call false start right there on a dead clock. Look up the rules.

    • @tezzah...
      @tezzah... 12 днів тому +1

      Go to an optician first

    • @myhoodiskc
      @myhoodiskc 12 днів тому

      @tezzah... 😂🤡

    • @Brent-r8j
      @Brent-r8j 5 днів тому

      @@myhoodiskc your right it was a illegal shift but the play was already blown dead as soon as they snapped it making the play dead on a inadvertent whistle once the whistle blew and flag was thrown for false start the play is dead even tho it was a illegal shift Article 1 section O from the 2024 NFL rulebook
      I’ll put u up on game broo…
      when an official sounds the whistle erroneously while the ball is still in play, the ball becomes DEAD IMMEDIATELY.
      If the ball is in player possession, the team in possession may elect to put the ball in play where it has been declared dead or to replay the down.
      If the ball is a loose ball resulting from a fumble, backward pass, or illegal forward pass, the team LAST IN POSSESSION (the raiders) may elect to put the ball in play at the spot where possession was lost or to replay the down.
      If the ball is a loose ball resulting from a legal forward pass, a free kick, a fair-catch kick, or a scrimmage kick, the ball is returned to the previous spot, and the down is replayed.
      If there is a foul by either team during any of the above, and the team in possession at the time of the erroneous whistle elects not to replay the down, penalty enforcement is the same as for fouls during a run, forward pass, kick, fumble, and backward pass. If the team in possession elects to replay the down, all penalties will be disregarded, except for personal fouls and unsportsmanlike conduct fouls, which will be administered prior to the replaying of the down. If the down is replayed, the game clock will be reset to the time remaining when the snap occurred, and the clock will start on the snap. (That means play is dead)
      when a fumble is recovered or caught by a teammate of the fumbling player, and the fumble occurs on a play that is subject to the “two-minute,” "Try," or “fourth-down” fumble provisions. See 8-7-5 and 8-7-6.
      when the ball is out of bounds.
      if a loose ball in play strikes a video board, guide wire, sky cam, or any other object, the ball will be dead immediately, and the down will be replayed at the previous spot. In the event the down is replayed, the game clock will be reset to the time remaining when the snap occurred, and the clock will start on the All penalties will be disregarded, except for personal fouls or unsportsmanlike conduct fouls, which will be administered prior to the replaying of the down; or
      when a runner’s helmet comes completely off.

    • @Brent-r8j
      @Brent-r8j 5 днів тому

      @@myhoodiskc so those are the rules now whose the 🤡🤡🤡

    • @myhoodiskc
      @myhoodiskc 5 днів тому

      @@Brent-r8j there was no whistle before recovery

  • @franksleatherhoilman8932
    @franksleatherhoilman8932 11 днів тому +5

    Chiefs clearly get help. This is not the first time.
    Sadly... no one is going to do anything about it.
    I average 6 games a year. If this keeps up, I'm going to save my money.

    • @bobbywilhelmi9932
      @bobbywilhelmi9932 11 днів тому

      thank god you’re going to save your money 🙏

    • @deannash1472
      @deannash1472 9 днів тому

      Here's one of the worst calls I've ever seen going against the Chiefs in playoff game that they would lose by 1 point. Get all the calls, I don't think so? ua-cam.com/video/XkT_mNU6ecI/v-deo.html

  • @jlsajulan
    @jlsajulan 7 днів тому

    If the situation was turned around and this happened against the Chiefs this would be a different video and nobody would argue about it

  • @ARE175
    @ARE175 12 днів тому +12

    The league office hates the raiders....But god sees everything...carlson did miss 3 fgs though lets not let him off the hook...

    • @raideralexofficial
      @raideralexofficial  12 днів тому +4

      Yeah he costed us big time smh

    • @g.jeromedecarloii8644
      @g.jeromedecarloii8644 12 днів тому +1

      Raiders are trash!!!

    • @mosesluevanos3159
      @mosesluevanos3159 12 днів тому +1

      And for the raiders to be so trash they seem like they giving the chiefs all they can handle lol I think they tanked that game if not they would have won 😅

    • @MrDavidknigge
      @MrDavidknigge 11 днів тому

      It was too far for Carlson. He should not have been trying for 50 yard FGs in that weather.

    • @jibernish
      @jibernish 10 днів тому +1

      Carlson was under the influence of Fan Duel et al. Don't you all think it's funny how bad all the kickers are this year?

  • @generalmoonstone
    @generalmoonstone 3 дні тому

    I'm a Chiefs fan and I completely agree. When I saw this I knew the play should have been blown dead.

    • @Robert-fs6ge
      @Robert-fs6ge 2 дні тому

      It was dead at the snap according to section 7 of the rules regarding a false start call on the field

  • @macauliflowerculkin8731
    @macauliflowerculkin8731 12 днів тому +6

    Aiden's clapping COULD NOT HAVE solicited that snap because nobody was set; they were getting to the line. Why would a center snap the ball when nobody was set? The fact is, the referee blew the whistle dead and the Raiders got screwed again.

    • @MrDavidknigge
      @MrDavidknigge 11 днів тому

      Everybody on the line was set. The far left WR wasn't but nobody noticed until the TE on the left started waving which got O'Connell distracted.

    • @Navigator001
      @Navigator001 11 днів тому

      @@MrDavidknigge When Aidan was clapping, the linemen were still standing up. I think he was just trying to hurry everyone up. The play clock was winding down, and there was only 15 seconds on the game clock.

    • @OldManWillie24
      @OldManWillie24 11 днів тому

      Aiden Never clapped his hands on this play. Watch replay

    • @MrDavidknigge
      @MrDavidknigge 11 днів тому

      @OldManWillie24 he did, they just didn't show it here.

  • @beccajesse1340
    @beccajesse1340 12 днів тому +3

    Because the main ref in new York said it was a right call , you're tired of games being decided like this I'm tired of after a win here comes every body bitching the refs gave it to us I'm sick of it week after week proving ourselves yet again smh .

  • @AllenWoodman
    @AllenWoodman 10 днів тому +2

    Lol, Go Chiefs Kingdom !!!!!!

  • @aros007z
    @aros007z 12 днів тому +5

    Quarterback and center equally share blame on this one!

    • @Jumpingoffthecliff
      @Jumpingoffthecliff 11 днів тому

      @@aros007z ua-cam.com/video/iG_ZqByt5K0/v-deo.htmlsi=eOi7pLTXMp1iwiM3

  • @ChadChadoChad
    @ChadChadoChad 11 днів тому +2

    You don’t know the rule because it’s a 4:37 illegal shift because two ppl are moving at the same time

    • @5IveNDlme
      @5IveNDlme 11 днів тому +1

      The ref doesn’t know the rule and blew the whistle in error. Are you that dense. That is explained in the video. Once the ref made an error and blew the play dead players don’t go for the ball.

  • @BB-pq3vj
    @BB-pq3vj 12 днів тому +9

    The whistle blew and how do chiefs get all the calls go their way in close games

    • @steelvipers1835
      @steelvipers1835 11 днів тому

      The play was actually an illegal shift, the one ref should have never have blown his whistle. This is not a Chiefs get all the calls problem, its the refs blew another call and the nfl is going to do nothing problem.

    • @goldiego1
      @goldiego1 11 днів тому +1

      READ AND KNOW THE RULES. The Raiders spiked the ball on the previous play to stop the clock. Therefore, on the next play, the illegal shift is now, per the rules, a LIVE BALL FOUL. They are to wait until the ball is secured. That is why the whistle does not sound until after Bolton is on the ball. Had the clock been running then the play would have been blown dead. This is why KC this time got the ball. Nothing more. Haters!

    • @bobbymira8234
      @bobbymira8234 11 днів тому +1

      @@goldiego1 I don't think its about what the correct rule is, I think its more of when a ref blows the play dead, then people may give up on a play, so that loose ball on the ground may have had a different outcome had the ref not signaled a false start and blown the whistle because people are supposed to stop when the whistle blows. Like if a guy is tackling someone and is in the grasp, and blows the whistle, then some dude comes outta nowhere and smacks the guy, hes going to get a 15 yard penalty for a late hit. So naturally when the ref blew his whistle, its supposed to be a dead ball, and some players don't react to the situation, whether or not the ref was right about the call - the signal was false start so it should just be that.

    • @MikeDavis-be8gf
      @MikeDavis-be8gf 11 днів тому

      State farm and Roger Goodell

    • @Jumpingoffthecliff
      @Jumpingoffthecliff 11 днів тому

      @@BB-pq3vj when there are fumbles before the whistle blows play is allowed to continue. You can look up the NFL rule. It’s been around over fifteen years now. ARTICLE 4. AWARDING POSSESSION

  • @javierdeanda9958
    @javierdeanda9958 12 днів тому +5

    If we had a kicker it would've been 26-19 , feel like our kicker missed on purpose

    • @raideralexofficial
      @raideralexofficial  12 днів тому +2

      True lol

    • @starship2023
      @starship2023 12 днів тому +4

      You forgot to consider the Chiefs Kicker AND their backup kicker were hurt they were litterly on their 3rd one

    • @BeetlePimpJuice
      @BeetlePimpJuice 12 днів тому +2

      @@raideralexofficialnah bro it’s the refs fault that’s what intelligent people think happened 😢

    • @echohotel4963
      @echohotel4963 12 днів тому

      @@BeetlePimpJuice nah bro it's the Raiders fault that's what unbiased people who know the rules think happened.

    • @MrDavidknigge
      @MrDavidknigge 11 днів тому

      The ball wasn't carrying. Pre-game neither kicker could kick over 50 yards, yet Coach Pierce kept trotting him out there.

  • @jimmurphy834
    @jimmurphy834 10 днів тому +2

    Play was whistled dead, nothing that happens after that means squat. Refereee runs in after blowing whistle signaling false start. Play over dead ball foul, Raiders ball on 37 yd line, still 3rd down.
    All that replay in NY and they let them get it wrong. All they had to do was review the play and they chose not to do their job and gift KC another W.

  • @dcb6729
    @dcb6729 12 днів тому +12

    They fumbled the ball, and the Chiefs jumped on it. There is nothing controversial about it. 😂

    • @josephromero3975
      @josephromero3975 11 днів тому

      Kermit the frog gave the ref a blow job to make that call

  • @heathwolfe4579
    @heathwolfe4579 11 днів тому +1

    The Raiders only lost by 2 pts to the defending champs in their stadium when the Raiders could have won 26 to 19. That is a very acceptable loss and could have won 29 to 19 or 33 to 19 if not for those 3 missed Field Goals and if the Raiders would have went on to score a touchdown or a Field Goal on that last drive or the fumble drive. Nothing for Raider Nation to hang their heads about. The Raiders can beat the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. Good effort and Good job Raiders. 👍🏈👍🏉👍🏉👍🏈👍🏉👍🏈🏉👍🏈👍🏉👍🏈👍.

  • @deweytaylor9080
    @deweytaylor9080 11 днів тому +5

    Just like last year with Kadarius Tony they allowed the play against the bills to continue and took the touchdown away from KC. This was no different The raiders fumbled the Chiefs recovered.

    • @davetrayford
      @davetrayford 11 днів тому +1

      Absolutely...painful reality then ! Well said. !

    • @raideralexofficial
      @raideralexofficial  11 днів тому

      Yeah and Mahomes was whining after the game even told it to Josh Allen instead of congratulating him.. class act

    • @Brent-r8j
      @Brent-r8j 5 днів тому

      @@deweytaylor9080 that isn’t even similar to what happen here that was 4th down dude already was 5 yards upfield when the snapped it and that’s a loss of down u don’t get 5 downs so it was game over not to mention time expired there was still 15 seconds on the clock and the play was blown dead it’s not rocket science

    • @deweytaylor9080
      @deweytaylor9080 3 дні тому

      @@Brent-r8j you’re right he was completely offsides and they still let the play go. Check the roll box everybody that knows football is calling it right

    • @deweytaylor9080
      @deweytaylor9080 3 дні тому

      Rulebook

  • @asoto3057
    @asoto3057 11 днів тому +1

    What could have happened if they could have spiked the ball And it would have been forth down and they kicked the ball and also stop the clock. where does this get his info I don't know

  • @demontiakpinkney5881
    @demontiakpinkney5881 12 днів тому +3

    Don't miss 3 field goals ur most likely to lose a game no matter the team. Thats what ya need to talk about to not just the last play.

  • @wickedcurve
    @wickedcurve 12 днів тому +1

    Chiefs STM here…I was at the game. People in the stands were yelling “illegal shift” before it was even announced.
    Aside from that, what if all the players on the field assumed the play was dead after they thought they heard a whistle, and as a result, didn’t go after the ball? What would the call have been then?

    • @MrDavidknigge
      @MrDavidknigge 11 днів тому +1

      What if no one heard a whistle except the Raider bench?

    • @Navigator001
      @Navigator001 11 днів тому

      It doesn't matter what the players thought. The Ref called the play dead. If the fans were yelling illegal shift, then that should have been a clue to the Ref that called the false start and stopped the play.

    • @5IveNDlme
      @5IveNDlme 11 днів тому

      Yeah but the ref made an error. It’s almost like you don’t care that he made an error. Clearly in the replay raises his whistle and blows it. As well, if you don’t think he blew it, ask yourself what a ref does every time before running on the field and spinning those hands signalling a false start. It’s a simple line of reasoning.

    • @wickedcurve
      @wickedcurve 11 днів тому +1

      There may have been different perspectives from different refs; in that case the crew chief took it all into consideration and made the final call.

    • @5IveNDlme
      @5IveNDlme 10 днів тому

      @ yeah the wrong one lol. That was comical. Thx for the explanation. I died.

  • @PhilipNunez-zo4or
    @PhilipNunez-zo4or 12 днів тому +15

    What does all that matter, a false start means the offense crosses the line of scrimmage, that didn't happen. There was motion, and the center snapped the ball. Chiefs recovered, chiefs ball. You try to make controversy then admit Quarterback, Center error. Come on Sir! Chiefs win! Raiders played hard.

    • @BeetlePimpJuice
      @BeetlePimpJuice 12 днів тому +4

      He’s a NFL conspiracy theorist. He says the game was decided by the refs when it was not. It was an illegal shift by rule and that’s what was called. I was watching the game, I didn’t hear a whistle and neither did OP. Also, how much did the raiders lose by? And how many kicks did Carson miss abysmally? Nah let’s blame the refs

    • @zarathustrasmith1604
      @zarathustrasmith1604 11 днів тому

      Yes, in hind sight we can see the correct call was illegal shift. The problem is that the ref was signaling false start and the whistle was blown meaning the play is dead. Since that could reasonable change the outcome of the play, like stopping players from scrambling and jumping for the ball, it's too late to go back and change the call from a dead ball foul (false start) to a live ball foul (illegal shift.) The refs should never decide the outcome of the game, which is exactly what happened here. Even though the correct call would have been illegal shift, the fact that they whistled the play dead meant that they should stick with the call and the raiders would have a chance to win or lose based on a 54 yard field goal attempt. Which is not a given since Daniel Carlson missed 3 field goals already that game.

    • @BeetlePimpJuice
      @BeetlePimpJuice 11 днів тому

      @ dude did you even read the rules I cited directly from the rulebook?

    • @donaldwatkins5438
      @donaldwatkins5438 10 днів тому

      @@PhilipNunez-zo4or Incorrect. The offense does not have to cross the line of scrimmage in order to call a false start. A simple flinch after being set is also a false start. It is “offsides” when a lineman crosses the line of scrimmage before the ball is snapped. Nevertheless, there was no false start, the correct call was illegal shift. However, that is beside the point. The line Jude threw the flag, blew the play dead before the snap, and ran onto the field signaling false start. That means, the play never happened, in other words, the ball was never snapped, the ball was never fumbled, and the Chiefs never recovered. Raiders football. All action after that official’s whistle is nullified. I absolutely have no horse in this race. I don’t care who won the game or who lost. The Raiders got screwed by an officiating crew that knows better. They cannot ignore a blown whistle and enforce a live ball foul when the play was blown dead.

  • @jerseyraider9618
    @jerseyraider9618 10 днів тому

    Raiders weren’t screwed, this helps them

  • @MrJetmech
    @MrJetmech 12 днів тому +8

    I wonder how the rigged refs got the center to snap the ball. Anyone got an idea? We know it was the refs.

    • @starship2023
      @starship2023 12 днів тому +4

      Bro, what are you talking about you can clearly see yourself, the ref, came up to the center with his mic accidentally one saying "Hey ignore your QB snap it when I still you blue 80 set hut"

  • @jmendo2546
    @jmendo2546 11 днів тому +1

    The other Raider player touched the Center 4:47 and he might have thought the touch was the quarterback. Now that I seen that on your video, it make's more sense,why the center snapped the ball.

  • @BillyDavis-vr2iu
    @BillyDavis-vr2iu 12 днів тому +3

    Yes it was some bullshit man R4nl

  • @asoto3057
    @asoto3057 11 днів тому +1

    You're not a die heart raiders fan if you're not with the team.

  • @theartistformerlyknownasth8612
    @theartistformerlyknownasth8612 12 днів тому +4

    its basically this, same action in both
    clock is moving, its false start
    clock isnt moving, its illegal shift
    the clock was stopped

    • @BeetlePimpJuice
      @BeetlePimpJuice 12 днів тому +1

      OP doesn’t want to hear that lol

    • @colleenc9286
      @colleenc9286 12 днів тому +1

      Doesn't matter ref whistled it dead

    • @theartistformerlyknownasth8612
      @theartistformerlyknownasth8612 12 днів тому +1

      @colleenc9286 a clear recovery can happen even if one ref blows his whistle as long as it's a continuous action

    • @BeetlePimpJuice
      @BeetlePimpJuice 12 днів тому +2

      @@colleenc9286 prove it. He put his whistle in his mouth half a second earlier that the back judge but didn’t make any type of call until after the play was done. Play back the tape and compare everything I just said. You didn’t hear a whistle and you don’t have proof that he blew his whistle.

    • @BeetlePimpJuice
      @BeetlePimpJuice 12 днів тому +2

      @ can you elaborate on this please? Thanks I’m trying to get more info on the play but at the end of the day the refs made the right call.

  • @michaelledford5081
    @michaelledford5081 11 днів тому +1

    They had spiked the ball the play before so the clock was stopped so there for it is a fumble clearly recovered by the Chiefs.

  • @mountart2
    @mountart2 11 днів тому +9

    The Refs and The Chiefs should really get a room!

    • @tomnecessary1442
      @tomnecessary1442 10 днів тому

      They already have a room , it in Patrick's name ha

  • @5IveNDlme
    @5IveNDlme 11 днів тому +1

    Commenting about what the rule is, is in essence irrelevant because the ref made an error. Blew the play dead which thus effects how players react making it unfair to have the outcome happen. It’s simple.

  • @donarmstrong2182
    @donarmstrong2182 12 днів тому +5

    Your problem with the play did not happen the way you stated. It was illegal shift, your eyes see it, the linejudge was just wrong, and you didn't see a whistle, whistles are sounds. At the same time that line judge runs on the field, the chiefs already have the ball.
    Rule book states, you don't stop play for illegal shifts.

    • @Bowers_Fan
      @Bowers_Fan 12 днів тому +1

      False

    • @Navigator001
      @Navigator001 11 днів тому

      Once a Ref blows the play dead, you can't undo it and change the infraction. The Ref clearly threw his flag, and ran onto the field to stop the play indicating a false start. Error or not, you can't stop the play, then later say, nevermind. They should have replayed the down.

  • @jackgreen1261
    @jackgreen1261 12 днів тому +2

    I don't know after 60 years of watching the Raiders and the Chiefs this is not something out of the ordinary we always fight like cats and dogs and argue and punch and hit somebody from The Blind Side so I didn't really get too excited you know I'm a Kansas City fan so whatever whatever I'm from back in the days of the players that most of you aren't even old enough to remember let me have some horrendous Wars

  • @kenweaver3462
    @kenweaver3462 11 днів тому

    You're 100% right he did blow the whistle.. unbelievable

  • @cliffords.8341
    @cliffords.8341 День тому

    As a Dolphins fan since they became a team, I don't care about the Raiders and the Chiefs, but I do like to watch Mahomes, the Raiders got screwed on this one. When players do something wrong they get penalized, but when referees make a huge mistake, nothing is done and the team that got the wrong call pays the price possibly costing them the game like in this one. How can a false start penalty be reversed when it was clearly a correct call?

  • @Carl-oc7dw
    @Carl-oc7dw 9 днів тому

    The Bears coach got fired not for blowing the game but for not being able to make the rigging seem believable.

  • @Azrael369-o4h
    @Azrael369-o4h 10 днів тому

    " We were most definitely robbed!" But as every Raiders true fans really knows, it's always the NFL vs Raiders! We loose to very controversial plays every time! Does anyone remember the " NO TUCK RULE!" and that sucker bought a small share of the Raiders! LMFAO 🤣 🤣! Remember brothers and sisters! There are 31 NFL teams and then there's the Raiders! We most definitely are the black sheep of the family!

  • @lischultz14
    @lischultz14 11 днів тому +1

    The controversy stems from the top official along the sideline at the top of the screen is blowing the play dead from the start. the easiest way to tell is he leaves his position and runs on to the field immediatly at the snap. those officials dont leave the sidelines untll the plays dead or they are blowing it dead themselves. So no matter what the penalty was the official called the play dead like it or not it.

  • @timcampbell901
    @timcampbell901 11 днів тому

    As a long time Raider fan I have no love for KC so I hate losing to them, but you said it we need a top 2 pick so today I am looking to the draft. Also as a Raider fan over the years when it comes to calls we get no Love.

  • @peternewbury4953
    @peternewbury4953 10 днів тому +1

    Vegas needed the Chiefs to win due to a large money line wager on the Raiders. Calls like this are happening more often due to legal gambling.

  • @anthonypetersen7883
    @anthonypetersen7883 2 дні тому

    Even the players knew it was a live ball and continued to keep playing

  • @oliverlopez2254
    @oliverlopez2254 11 днів тому

    This was perfect thanks bro 👍

  • @michaelcharlespackenham8620
    @michaelcharlespackenham8620 11 днів тому

    As far as I’m concerned we won that game. We played great. Maybe we have something with O’CONNELL and the Turners. Just happy this wasn’t a playoff game!! It would have been tuck rule 2.0.

  • @INMATEofARKHAM
    @INMATEofARKHAM 8 днів тому

    It was a clear fumble recovery. The ball can be awarded even if their is a whistle if the ball is clearly recovered, so the whistle didn't matter.
    Second, a false start happens when a player jumps early when the ream is set. As you pointed out the reciver at the top wasn't set so it wasnt s false start. It was an illegal shift.
    All of this was called right and if it wasn't called right and it was abyone but the chiefs there would be nothing but outrage as teams who shoot themselves in the foor shouldn't be rewarded for it.

  • @Jumpingoffthecliff
    @Jumpingoffthecliff 11 днів тому

    Maybe you'll pin this comment? The possibility that the ref blew the whistle early is moot. Under the official NFL rules fumble plays are allowed to continue after the whistle whether the whistle was inadvertent or not. If there is a clear recovery of the ball it is awarded to the recovering team. Clearly this was not a false start since the ball was snapped before the penalty flags flew. The rule has been outlined in the NFL rules since 2008 under "Awarding Possession". The fact is, the refs ended up calling this correctly because the chiefs clearly recovered the loose ball.

  • @Daniel12.4Ministry
    @Daniel12.4Ministry 10 днів тому

    It appears that the QB was looking at the ref that blew the whistle, thus not seeing the ball coming towards him.

  • @ns3699
    @ns3699 11 днів тому

    The ref who blew the whistle on raiders sideline moved it to his mouth at 2:04
    Right as the receiver is trying to line up his arm comes up and blows it right before he throws flag

  • @Dr.TuRon_Davis
    @Dr.TuRon_Davis 7 днів тому

    What you left out was the flag the official threw on the other side of the field by the other ref that called the illegal shift.

  • @Livewirebeatz
    @Livewirebeatz 11 днів тому

    Great video!!! Thanks!

  • @Rich-jd9up
    @Rich-jd9up 10 днів тому +1

    Rigged. Refs confer with mics off to figure out ANY WAY to secure a Chiefs win when the "gift" presented itself before them. Otherwise they probably would have called a penalty on the Raiders on the field goal attempt.

  • @Avkenue_finest
    @Avkenue_finest 11 днів тому

    They still mad when we loose go RAIDERS

  • @jesusgarcia-fk3es
    @jesusgarcia-fk3es 9 днів тому

    Because the play clock was stopped it made it an illegal shift but had the play clock been running it would have been a false start thus killing the play, Raiders ball.

  • @WesCOX-mm4oz
    @WesCOX-mm4oz 11 днів тому +2

    Yes your take is totally accurate!!! It was totally a false start!!! Which is a dead ball foul!!! I hate when bad calls decide the game!!!

    • @davetrayford
      @davetrayford 11 днів тому

      False start ? Dude; player was lined up offsides in the neutral zone...NOT a false start. Chiefs got fairly penalized for their receiver being in neutral zone...ball was snapped and play proceed....receiver caught the ball for an apparent TD...but refs called it back, removed the TD score and penalized Chiefs 5 yrds to replay the down. Chiefs lost that close game to Bills previous season. Deal with that reality !

    • @raideralexofficial
      @raideralexofficial  11 днів тому

      Facts

  • @catfissh
    @catfissh 12 днів тому +1

    Y’all remember when he was on the mic, the dude who signaled false start was trynna tell him something and the ref on the mic told him to be quiet…

    • @MrDavidknigge
      @MrDavidknigge 11 днів тому +1

      Yep, I saw and heard that too. That line judge got over-ruled. It happens. As it turns out, he was wrong.

  • @johnyim3849
    @johnyim3849 11 днів тому

    The NFL commented on the play. “Had the clock been running at the snap, then by rule an illegal shift would convert to a false start,” a league spokesman said, via The Athletic. “Since the clock was stopped (spike on the second-down play), an illegal shift is a live ball foul.” I'm not an expert rules analyst (and a Chiefs fan), but I think if the clock was running and this play happened, then the penalty would have been a false start and the play would have been dead. I agree with Raider Alex, I heard a whistle prior to the recovery and assumed that they were going to replay the down.

    • @kirkpatc4082
      @kirkpatc4082 11 днів тому

      The clock was stopped after the spike from the previous play so by rule it is illegal motion and does not stop the play

    • @5IveNDlme
      @5IveNDlme 11 днів тому

      That’s the issue. Commenting about what the rule is, is in essence irrelevant because the ref made an error. Blew the play dead which thus effects how players react making it unfair to have the outcome happen. It’s simple.

  • @georgevega4019
    @georgevega4019 11 днів тому

    This is on the Raiders, for one why is the QB in shotgun formation? avoid the bad snap and get AOC under center. Second, AP burned the last time out over a punt decision. Could have used that last time out to set up the field goal to win the game.

  • @twenty4thstwashanddry
    @twenty4thstwashanddry 12 днів тому +1

    The center should of never hiked the ball without looking at his QB

  • @john316kjb
    @john316kjb 11 днів тому

    Im a Raider, never, NEVER want 2 lose, draft pick or not, never lose

  • @dudleyFudpucker
    @dudleyFudpucker 8 днів тому

    Every network or media that covers the live coverage of an NFL game, needs to be able to interview all NFL refs and ask them about their play calling during games. And the NFL must make it mandatory for all NFL refs to answer all questions to the best of their ability after every game.

  • @bobsmith-y3j
    @bobsmith-y3j 9 днів тому

    This stuff goes on every Sunday. Why even bother getting upset? Its not gonna change anything. Winners are chosen as always. Its Vegas,baby!

  • @kirkpatc4082
    @kirkpatc4082 11 днів тому

    When you watch the tape there was no false start but Meyers did cover up the Tight End which does not stop the play

  • @raiderrob672
    @raiderrob672 12 днів тому

    Meyers was never set and was moving forward across the line before the ball was snapped. The ref was in mid-flag toss when the ball was snapped.

  • @cronoros
    @cronoros 12 днів тому +2

    Theres alot of details here. But most dont matter, the two key questions are:
    Did a dead ball penalty occur?
    Note the wording "occur" the ref signalled it as a false start but that doesnt matter, what matters is the penalty they officially call and they didnt call a False Start. Looking at the set of the raiders in the tape it doesnt look like a false start occurs. In that case calling a false start is the wrong call and had AOC caught the ball evey raiders fan would be pissed off that a false start was called (and rightly so). In my opinion, I can't see any dead ball penalty that would invalidate the snap.
    Second question, Was the play whistled dead before the Chiefs recovered?
    Again lots of details, he put the whistle in his mouth and signals to stop the clock, both of these are irrelevant, what matters is *when* he blew the whistle. I watched it back about 20 times, slowed it down to half and quarter speed and I dont hear any whistle sounding until about the time the ball is recovered (based on broadcast sound played from youtube) it's pretty much simultaneous. Does he have control/ possession at the split second? Its practically impossible to tell without expensive AV tech that makes it beyond the scope of what a ref (or anyone) can do on the field and in the moment.
    I dont doubt that Refs make biased calls on some level, its reality, but I think if you took humam error out of the refereeing for this play then the chiefs would have had the ball after it.

    • @starship2023
      @starship2023 12 днів тому +2

      Finally, someone who actually looked back and listened to the audio like me it was close but still right after the recovery

    • @rubensaucedo4118
      @rubensaucedo4118 11 днів тому

      Call it what you will, the bottom line in this NFL is if the opposing teams offense would have done the exact same thing the Raiders offense did, it would not have been ruled a turnover recovered by the defense, and that’s the bottom line.

    • @Robert-fs6ge
      @Robert-fs6ge 11 днів тому

      @@rubensaucedo4118 Maybe but the thing people are missing it the down judge signaled dead ball at the snap and then signaled false start to reiterate that the play was dead. Can't be a turnover after the official indicated dead ball

    • @starship2023
      @starship2023 11 днів тому

      @@Robert-fs6ge It's not dead tell tue whistle since didn't come in tell after the damn play if you listen to audio when the whistle comes in

    • @Robert-fs6ge
      @Robert-fs6ge 11 днів тому

      @starship2023 Not true The down judge signaled dead ball at the snap and then left the sideline immediately which means dead play or else he has to stay at the sideline

  • @lbranom3310
    @lbranom3310 10 днів тому

    As a Raiders fan, I wanted to loose so we can be number one. But I want to loose to the team we’re playing not the officials. If there is ever proof of games being fixed the NFL is over. It will also bring a spotlight to other sports. Also what will that say to the kids in Pop Warner, high school, college etc… who have hopes of playing pro.

  • @MrAjbaca
    @MrAjbaca 11 днів тому

    We've all seen calls changed or reversed after a ref powow but this play was blew dead and players are told to play until the whistle. But at the end of the day Sh*t Happens.

  • @robertcerda92
    @robertcerda92 12 днів тому +1

    Raiders vs Browns in the playoffs. Whistle blows, players stop, browns score a TD, and they let it count.

    • @expertopinion8111
      @expertopinion8111 12 днів тому

      I was at that game against the bengals it was classic bullshit by the refts this was the whole point of the guys watching in New York to correct reft bullshit mistakes!! Apparently what are they good for!!

  • @josephgonsalves755
    @josephgonsalves755 9 днів тому

    Does anyone else notice that every other week the NFL defends calls that helped the Chiefs win.

  • @KCShox
    @KCShox 10 днів тому

    At the end of the day, was the correct call made? Absolutely! It was an illegal shift, there were numerous Raiders moving at the snap. An illegal shift occurs when two or more offensive players move before the play begins. The correct call was made end of story.

  • @chrispy_x11
    @chrispy_x11 11 днів тому

    Sound amplified, not a single whistle. the ref is a human and upon snapping the ball he threw the flag and signaled for a false start. Luckily the others knew the rules and got together to discuss. They got it right. The Raiders never became set which is an illegal shift. You can only call a false start on a player that has become set and moves early. It's pretty easy to understand if you just look at the facts and the rules.

  • @michaelray5023
    @michaelray5023 8 днів тому

    Pat Mahomes is the real life ‘Truman Show’

  • @anthonypetersen7883
    @anthonypetersen7883 10 днів тому

    Let’s see what the actual NFL rule is in this case, which led to their decision on the play.
    Since the clock was stopped (due to the spike on the second-down play), an illegal shift is a “live-ball foul.” In other words, the league is saying the foul was an illegal shift instead of a false start, which the official in the video above appears to indicate. Whether or not the side judge blew his whistle makes no difference in this case. Period.

  • @michaelbrundege6118
    @michaelbrundege6118 9 днів тому

    The Ref didnt run onto field for the hell of it. Plus his call shouldnt be overturned to something completely different. Chiefs 7-5 no 3peat. GO BILLS.

  • @leeedwards8323
    @leeedwards8323 11 днів тому

    The ref blew the whistle and ran on the field with a false start. I saw it live. That should have been a five yard plenty and the Raiders ball.

  • @joepromedio
    @joepromedio 7 днів тому

    The big fuss is because there are a lot of people who hate the Chiefs. This happens when a team wins too much. Haters gonna hate.

  • @jerrybrazeal3069
    @jerrybrazeal3069 10 днів тому

    If he would have not missed the ball and threw it out of bounds like they planned it would have been a 5 yard penalty making it a 55 yard field goal try. He wasn't making that anyway.

  • @dwaynefriesen5263
    @dwaynefriesen5263 11 днів тому

    Illegal shift…yes the refs had to discuss, but in the end there were at least two players moving at the snap. Game officials frequently have to sort out a play and make a decision, based on the rules, as to what the correct call should be. I do it as a baseball umpire but it’s the same idea. With more than one official on the field, both can make calls but ultimately, in most cases, the rule book makes the determination. It sucks that the call had to determine the game outcome(I’ve had to make similar calls and it really does suck) but looking at the rule(7-4-7), they made the right call in the end.

  • @robertwadas
    @robertwadas 9 днів тому

    Left side receiver did not move forward, he moved laterally which he is allowed to do.. He clearly was not on the line of scrimmage.

  • @thedeadp00lttv
    @thedeadp00lttv 11 днів тому

    Arrowhead stadium, you can't hear the whilst with 15 sec left with the play clock running.

  • @redrick9046
    @redrick9046 9 днів тому

    Correct Ruling
    The sideline referee's whistle effectively stopped the play. Since the whistle occurred:
    During the fumble (before recovery by the Chiefs):
    The play is immediately dead.
    By rule, the down should have been replayed because there was no established possession when the whistle was blown.
    Per Rule 7, Section 2, Article 1(c), the play cannot stand as a Chiefs' recovery because the whistle made the ball dead before possession was determined. Therefore, the referee's decision to allow the Chiefs to decline the penalty and take possession was incorrect.
    Conclusion
    The play should have been ruled dead when the whistle was blown. The correct procedure would be to:
    Declare the play dead due to the whistle.
    Replay the down from the previous spot.
    Cited Rules:
    Rule 7, Section 2, Article 1 (Live-ball fouls and the effect of whistles).
    Rule 7, Section 2, Article 1(c) (Inadvertent whistles).

    • @davetrayford
      @davetrayford 8 днів тому

      BS; go watch/listen to the TV video. NO whistles blew until AFTER QB FUMBLE and CHIEFS subsequent recovery.

  • @miker4160
    @miker4160 11 днів тому

    What a joke! Chiefs get every freaking break. The ref ran in full sprint and called a false start. We got screwed