i'm a political science studend and our preliminary exam is coming. i found this video effective to gain some informations and knowledge about Family code.
My favorite part of this video is your answers to the questions flashed, Atty. Nonetheless, I find the whole lecture interesting and informative. Thank you.
Watching regularly.. sana magkaroon din po ng video on EASEMENTS OF SERVITUDES...:) ang galing mo po mag explain, naiimagine ko siya habang dinidiscuss...thank you po sir...
I used to dream of being an attorney. I never had the chance to enroll in a law school but now that I have in mind what branch I will go into if I have given the chance, I think being a family law attorney is interesting
Thank you po Atty ang galing nyo pong mag explain, pwd po mag request tagalog version kasi po isa po ako sa PALA'WAN TRIBE na nabigyan ng CRASM po. Thnks po & GOD blss
Hello po! I'm an shs student in my school. We have our upcoming debate in December, and I was wondering if I could know what's your insights on our given topic, which is "The difference of marriage in the Philippines and other countries. In relation to laws and religion practices".
How about po you getting married in April 17 we dont have Marrage lincense relased during your time of married and after 2 days April 19 released your marrid licnese this is valid or pwede ma void
Thank you atty... You are not only a great lecturer of the law but you are so influential and powerful because of your great and amazing ideas. Thumbs up po ako sa galing nyo sir👍👍😊
Atty.,ask ko lang po.my parents got married 1967(civil)and nov. 1967(church) with 3children(51-older,42-youngest) and they were separated before i was born(1979).he had another family,oldest is 44.but unfortunately father died 2002.and my grandparents have property and will be distributed to the family.but it’s sad that my parents have no records in psa.checked with the lcr but the records were all destroyed due to fire year 1903-1970(church wedding)the civil wedding lcr records were also not available on the date given. And to our dismay the second family has a marriage contract of their parents from psa.i want to ask, does my parents marriage valid even without psa m.contract record? Are we the illegitimate family since we cannot present any papers of their marriage?we only have their picture taken during the church wedding and a paper from lcr(church wedding)that says that during the year of wedding it was destroyed and a jint affidavit that states they personally know that my parents got married on the same date. What are our rights as the first family? Thank you po.
Hi Lence. It is imperative that you establish the fact of marriage. It can be established by evidence other than the record in the local civil registry or PSA. But you have to file a case for the registration of the marriage. Get yourself a lawyer to study your evidence and he will advise you what case to be filed. All the best!
Pinanganak Po Ako august 27 1992 Sa taon Yan ay namatay narin Ang tatay ko. Kaya Hindi sya nakapirma sa birthday certificate ko. Ang Ginagamit Kong apelyedo ay Ibarra (Tatay) apelyedo Ng tatay ko. Yan din Ang pinagamit ko sa dalawang anak ko. Tapos Nung kumuha Ako Ng PSA nakalagay sa apelyedo ay Sa Nanay ko (Posadas- middle / Palle apelyedo.) E Ang gamit ko na Po sa lahat Ng dukomento ko ay Ibarra . Pano ko Po mapapalitan Ang birth certificate ko at may pagaasa pa Po ba or papalitan ko Ng Palle Ang lahat
Articles I and II should be declared unconstitutional if we follow the ruling of the US in Obergefell v. Hodges (2015) for violating LGBT people right to marry and equal protection of the law (being a quasi-suspect class.) Besides, I find it weird when Family Code Commission included homosexuality and lesbianism as grounds for annulment (psychological incapacity and fraud) as well as legal separation (discovery after marriage). I mean we LGBT don't have the right to marry other a same-sex person yet if we marry an opposite-sex person, we are still vulnerable to legal attacks. Family Code implies that LGBT people have no right to have a family and protected relationship anymore! This is outright discriminatory and oppressive. At the same time, marital infidelity (concubinage and adultery) is not included as a ground for legal separation and annulment. What does this law really imply? That marital infidelity and disloyalty are way better than homosexuality? I mean, I don't have any control over my sexual orientation yet it is my fault to become that way? The law should prohibit/punish the overt acts, not the orientation intent, or motives. Does it mean a gay person doing nothing is more criminal-like than a husband or wife doing s3x with another person who is not his/her spouse? Consensual homosexual conduct (gay s3x and gay relationship) is not even criminalized in the Revised Penal Code or other penal laws. Yet, the other grounds for annulment and legal separation constitute or are related to criminal or prohibited acts including crimes involving moral turpitude. Yet, these crimes must afford court trials in able to overwhelm reasonable doubt of guilt. Yet, homosexuality and lesbianism, which is beyond your control, are enough reasons to attack your marriage. I, therefore, conclude that the Family Code, as far as its oppressive and discriminatory provisions against LGBT are concerned, is a complete bUllsh!t!
VAWC Law is specifically made for the benefit and the protection of Women and Children. It doesn't include men in it, aight? So does it mean that it is uncostitutional by nature of not providing the same effect and protection to men? No, of course not. Its intention is not to discriminate. In the same manner, Family Code of the Philippines is made for the establishment of family, where a man and a woman joined together having the possibility in nature, to produce offspring, protecting the contracting parties and their possible offspring and punishing those who neglect it. Don't compare your leftist idol country to the Philippines, they are western country, we are not. You can have a union to whoever you wanted to but don't call it marriage, you can build your own empire whatsoever but don't call it family. Simple as that. Family and marriage has long been defined before your twisted version of its definition. Oh, and by the way, who told you adultery and/or concubinage is not a ground? Hmm. Read your New Civil Code and Family Code, sire.
Is the principle of lex loci be applicable in recognized same sex marriage performed in a foreign country between a filipino and a foreigner ? lex loci does not specifically say it's only applicable to heterosexual marriage especially when same sex marriage is conducted and recognized by the foreign country that recognizes it as being valid. Can you please shed some light in to this issue. Thanks.
That same sex marriage between a Filipino and a foreigner will not be recognized here even if it is valid in the country where it was celebrated because the national law of the Filipino does not allow marriage between persons of the same sex. The Filipino partner is not capacitated under Philippine law. In this situation, the applicable rule is not lex loci celebrationis but lex nationalii.
Good morning po sir..I'm married for 5 years and so then, were separated, if i get national i.d. wich is advice for us now to get national ID because we're not yet legally separated. My question is; What family name should I'll be used to in applying to get a National ID..?? Pls.rply.Tnx!
Your marriage should be declared void or annulled first. You can't just change your surname because you guys are no longer together. It'll be a disaster if you use your maiden name. Certificate of annulment is not retroactive and so if there will be legal matters in the future, you'll get loads of headache.
Yes, that foreign national can marry here if his/her national law allows it. He/she just needs to show to the civil registrar here a certification from his consulate that he/she is legally capacitated to marry under his national law.
Yes po. Legal kasi wala namang restriction sa religion ng mag asawa. Ang importante ay kinasal sila sa ilalim ng batas (civil wedding) o sa simbahan na napili nila (church wedding)
Sir hope you can answer my question. What if po a man and woman #1 is married back in 1989 and got separated 1990. Around 1992 man met woman#2 and they had a kid 1993. They are still together until today for almost 30 years. Man doesn't have any idea about woman#1, no idea where she is or of she is still alive. Can the man marry woman #2?
The man can check with the Philippine Statistics Office if there is a record of death. If none, he can file a petition to declare the the first wife presumptively dead, provided he exerted earnest effort to look for her and is convinced that she's probably dead. In either case, actual death or presumptive death, the man can thereafter remarry.
Sir, do you mean to say that if I am an impostor, say a janitor, and one of the parties believes that I am a minister of the church and solemnized the marriage, that marriage is still valid. Even I don't have the authority and the right to sign the marriage contract as solemnizing officer, and still valid. This is the flaw of the law.
Interesting question. The law (Art. 35[2] of the Family Code) provides that the parties believed in good faith that the solemnizing officer had the authority to solemnize the marriage. This means that the parties exercised due diligence. So, the parties should at least ask the solemnizing office what his job is, ask for his ID, his authority (in case of pastor, minister, etc). Only when these efforts were exerted that the spouses are deemed in good faith. If the janitor would have been discovered if the parties exercised due diligence, and they did not exercise said due diligence, they are not in good faith and the marriage will be declared void.
![[UA] NAVI vs MOUZ | BO5 | IEM Rio 2024](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/CMBYk0cbGoA/mqdefault.jpg)
I'm a 1L student. Miderm is coming and I need to have a BIG improvement in my score in my prelim. Thank you for this Sir!
I'm a Political Science student and having a hard time since my class is still online. This is such a big help for me. Thankyou so much !!
i'm a political science studend and our preliminary exam is coming. i found this video effective to gain some informations and knowledge about Family code.
Love the explanation. Thank God, I finally found someone who teaches with substance!
That’s great Meca!
Thank you Atty Al for this brief and concise discussion about the Family Code of the Philippines.
My favorite part of this video is your answers to the questions flashed, Atty. Nonetheless, I find the whole lecture interesting and informative. Thank you.
Watching regularly.. sana magkaroon din po ng video on EASEMENTS OF SERVITUDES...:) ang galing mo po mag explain, naiimagine ko siya habang dinidiscuss...thank you po sir...
Yes. Meron na akong nagawang video on Easement. Check my video entitled Law for Neighbors in my Civil Law playlist. 😊
@@TheHowsofLaw ay sorry po.. okay po sir...hanapin ko po..thanks po..
I will watch these videos again before I take the bar. Thank you, Atty. Jumrani for these videos.
Good luck to the bar! Hope my videos can help. 😊
I used to dream of being an attorney. I never had the chance to enroll in a law school but now that I have in mind what branch I will go into if I have given the chance, I think being a family law attorney is interesting
Thank you po Atty ang galing nyo pong mag explain, pwd po mag request tagalog version kasi po isa po ako sa PALA'WAN TRIBE na nabigyan ng CRASM po. Thnks po & GOD blss
and also succession kase ang hirap imaginin.. pero pag c sir, ang galing magturo hehe...
May nagawa na akong tatlong videos on Succession. Check them out sa Civil Law playlist in my channel. 😊
Thank you, Atty. I love your lectures.
Thank you,Atty. Al!Enjoy ko po lagi nga discussions nyo!More power, Sir!
Having no access to any Civil Law Review books now that I am on isolation, this video lecture is helping me catch up. Thank you, sir.
Happy to help! Get well soon Ryan! 🙏
are the couple who faked their affidavit of cohabitation liable for perjury? who may file the case?
Nice sir... salamat.. I am also watching repeatedly your lectures on family code at sucession.. salamat talaga...
Meron pa susunod. Stay tuned! :)
Thank you, Sir! Very clear and truly helpful! More videos, please?
Thank you! Stay tuned for more informative videos 😊
Thank you so much for this Atty. Al Jumari.
Well said !! Fascinating explanations to family relations
Thank you!
Hopefully additonal videos on family code and sucession ..looking forward sir salamat.. God bless.. malaking tulong..
Thank you for this Atty. It helps me a lot.
You're welcome 🙂
Good evening po Atty. What would be the effect to the marriage if during the ceremony, there were no witnesses present? Thank you po.
Good pm attorney valid po ba ang kasal if pastor ang mag officiate pero both Catholics ang ikakasal??
Big help po to us...maraming salamat po Atty. 👍👌👏
I'm a refresher student any tips how to study to pass the bar?
My last results is 72.++%.
Thank you .
Hello po! I'm an shs student in my school. We have our upcoming debate in December, and I was wondering if I could know what's your insights on our given topic, which is "The difference of marriage in the Philippines and other countries. In relation to laws and religion practices".
Simply a great lecturer sir Al!!!
Thank you! ❤️
How about po you getting married in April 17 we dont have Marrage lincense relased during your time of married and after 2 days April 19 released your marrid licnese this is valid or pwede ma void
Hi atty. Ask ko lng Po possible Po ba or my chance n mas mapaaga po ung released Po Ng marriage license Po???
Very inspiring. Thank u❤
Thank you so much atty Al Jumrani.
Thank you atty... You are not only a great lecturer of the law but you are so influential and powerful because of your great and amazing ideas. Thumbs up po ako sa galing nyo sir👍👍😊
Thank you po ,Sir.
Atty.,ask ko lang po.my parents got married 1967(civil)and nov. 1967(church) with 3children(51-older,42-youngest) and they were separated before i was born(1979).he had another family,oldest is 44.but unfortunately father died 2002.and my grandparents have property and will be distributed to the family.but it’s sad that my parents have no records in psa.checked with the lcr but the records were all destroyed due to fire year 1903-1970(church wedding)the civil wedding lcr records were also not available on the date given. And to our dismay the second family has a marriage contract of their parents from psa.i want to ask, does my parents marriage valid even without psa m.contract record? Are we the illegitimate family since we cannot present any papers of their marriage?we only have their picture taken during the church wedding and a paper from lcr(church wedding)that says that during the year of wedding it was destroyed and a jint affidavit that states they personally know that my parents got married on the same date. What are our rights as the first family? Thank you po.
Hi Lence. It is imperative that you establish the fact of marriage. It can be established by evidence other than the record in the local civil registry or PSA. But you have to file a case for the registration of the marriage. Get yourself a lawyer to study your evidence and he will advise you what case to be filed. All the best!
more vlogs pa po attorney
Pinanganak Po Ako august 27 1992
Sa taon Yan ay namatay narin Ang tatay ko. Kaya Hindi sya nakapirma sa birthday certificate ko. Ang Ginagamit Kong apelyedo ay Ibarra (Tatay) apelyedo Ng tatay ko. Yan din Ang pinagamit ko sa dalawang anak ko. Tapos Nung kumuha Ako Ng PSA nakalagay sa apelyedo ay Sa Nanay ko (Posadas- middle / Palle apelyedo.) E Ang gamit ko na Po sa lahat Ng dukomento ko ay Ibarra . Pano ko Po mapapalitan Ang birth certificate ko at may pagaasa pa Po ba or papalitan ko Ng Palle Ang lahat
Thank you so much Atty.✨
Binge-watching all your videos. Ü
Thanks dear! Happy to help. Good luck! 😊
If a married couple once the man commit bigamy does the children were intitle not to be the heir of their father?
Articles I and II should be declared unconstitutional if we follow the ruling of the US in Obergefell v. Hodges (2015) for violating LGBT people right to marry and equal protection of the law (being a quasi-suspect class.)
Besides, I find it weird when Family Code Commission included homosexuality and lesbianism as grounds for annulment (psychological incapacity and fraud) as well as legal separation (discovery after marriage). I mean we LGBT don't have the right to marry other a same-sex person yet if we marry an opposite-sex person, we are still vulnerable to legal attacks. Family Code implies that LGBT people have no right to have a family and protected relationship anymore! This is outright discriminatory and oppressive.
At the same time, marital infidelity (concubinage and adultery) is not included as a ground for legal separation and annulment. What does this law really imply? That marital infidelity and disloyalty are way better than homosexuality? I mean, I don't have any control over my sexual orientation yet it is my fault to become that way? The law should prohibit/punish the overt acts, not the orientation intent, or motives. Does it mean a gay person doing nothing is more criminal-like than a husband or wife doing s3x with another person who is not his/her spouse?
Consensual homosexual conduct (gay s3x and gay relationship) is not even criminalized in the Revised Penal Code or other penal laws. Yet, the other grounds for annulment and legal separation constitute or are related to criminal or prohibited acts including crimes involving moral turpitude. Yet, these crimes must afford court trials in able to overwhelm reasonable doubt of guilt. Yet, homosexuality and lesbianism, which is beyond your control, are enough reasons to attack your marriage.
I, therefore, conclude that the Family Code, as far as its oppressive and discriminatory provisions against LGBT are concerned, is a complete bUllsh!t!
VAWC Law is specifically made for the benefit and the protection of Women and Children. It doesn't include men in it, aight? So does it mean that it is uncostitutional by nature of not providing the same effect and protection to men? No, of course not. Its intention is not to discriminate. In the same manner, Family Code of the Philippines is made for the establishment of family, where a man and a woman joined together having the possibility in nature, to produce offspring, protecting the contracting parties and their possible offspring and punishing those who neglect it.
Don't compare your leftist idol country to the Philippines, they are western country, we are not. You can have a union to whoever you wanted to but don't call it marriage, you can build your own empire whatsoever but don't call it family. Simple as that. Family and marriage has long been defined before your twisted version of its definition.
Oh, and by the way, who told you adultery and/or concubinage is not a ground? Hmm. Read your New Civil Code and Family Code, sire.
Parental Authority is being applied until the age of 25 years old.
Salamat sir.. ng marami.. God bless
Than you so much for this attorney :)
Is the principle of lex loci be applicable in recognized same sex marriage performed in a foreign country between a filipino and a foreigner ? lex loci does not specifically say it's only applicable to heterosexual marriage especially when same sex marriage is conducted and recognized by the foreign country that recognizes it as being valid. Can you please shed some light in to this issue. Thanks.
That same sex marriage between a Filipino and a foreigner will not be recognized here even if it is valid in the country where it was celebrated because the national law of the Filipino does not allow marriage between persons of the same sex. The Filipino partner is not capacitated under Philippine law. In this situation, the applicable rule is not lex loci celebrationis but lex nationalii.
@@TheHowsofLaw Thank you for the quick informative response.
Good morning po sir..I'm married for 5 years and so then, were separated, if i get national i.d. wich is advice for us now to get national ID because we're not yet legally separated. My question is; What family name should I'll be used to in applying to get a National ID..?? Pls.rply.Tnx!
Your marriage should be declared void or annulled first. You can't just change your surname because you guys are no longer together. It'll be a disaster if you use your maiden name. Certificate of annulment is not retroactive and so if there will be legal matters in the future, you'll get loads of headache.
Thank you so much for this sir . Very useful for us l.
You're welcome!
Thank you Sir
Thank u soooo much Atty!
You're welcome 😊
thank you very much.
Sir for PD 1067 water code of the Philippines
Thanks po
Hi Atty. Can a minor, who will turn 18 at the date of the marriage, without parental consent, be issued a marriage license?
no
Can a 16-year-old foreign national marry a Filipino citizen if his nationality law legally capacitates him to marry?
Yes, that foreign national can marry here if his/her national law allows it. He/she just needs to show to the civil registrar here a certification from his consulate that he/she is legally capacitated to marry under his national law.
@@TheHowsofLaw This is noted. Thanks for the response, atty. God bless po. Looking forward for more lecture videos to come po.😊
Thank you sir!!
You're welcome! 😊
Ang interfaith marriage or relationship po ba ay legal in the Philippines?
Yes po. Legal kasi wala namang restriction sa religion ng mag asawa. Ang importante ay kinasal sila sa ilalim ng batas (civil wedding) o sa simbahan na napili nila (church wedding)
Love it
Thank you Sir. 😊
You're most welcome!
Sir hope you can answer my question. What if po a man and woman #1 is married back in 1989 and got separated 1990. Around 1992 man met woman#2 and they had a kid 1993. They are still together until today for almost 30 years. Man doesn't have any idea about woman#1, no idea where she is or of she is still alive. Can the man marry woman #2?
The man can check with the Philippine Statistics Office if there is a record of death. If none, he can file a petition to declare the the first wife presumptively dead, provided he exerted earnest effort to look for her and is convinced that she's probably dead. In either case, actual death or presumptive death, the man can thereafter remarry.
@@TheHowsofLaw thank you so much po for your answer Sir. God bless you more.
Thank you!!!! :D
You're welcome!
Sir, do you mean to say that if I am an impostor, say a janitor, and one of the parties believes that I am a minister of the church and solemnized the marriage,
that marriage is still valid. Even I don't have the authority and the right to sign the marriage contract as solemnizing officer, and still valid. This is the flaw of the law.
Interesting question. The law (Art. 35[2] of the Family Code) provides that the parties believed in good faith that the solemnizing officer had the authority to solemnize the marriage. This means that the parties exercised due diligence. So, the parties should at least ask the solemnizing office what his job is, ask for his ID, his authority (in case of pastor, minister, etc). Only when these efforts were exerted that the spouses are deemed in good faith. If the janitor would have been discovered if the parties exercised due diligence, and they did not exercise said due diligence, they are not in good faith and the marriage will be declared void.
Atty. Please basahin nyo po yung chat ko po sainyo messenger ✨, thank you po have a good day Atty.
Marriage in the first place was designed by GOD. Genesis 2:18-25.
👏👏👏❤️
samahan mo naman po ng tagalog konti:(
Thank you po !