EXODUS: GODS AND KINGS Clip - "Battle of Kadesh" (2014)
Вставка
- Опубліковано 5 кві 2021
- EXODUS: GODS AND KINGS Clip - "Battle of Kadesh" (2014).
Most Popular Movie Clips -- bit.ly/3aqFfcg
PLOT: The defiant leader Moses rises up against Egyptian Pharaoh Ramses II, setting six hundred thousand slaves on a monumental journey of escape from Egypt and its terrifying cycle of deadly plagues.
RELEASE DATE: 12 December 2014 (USA)
GENRE: Action, Adventure, Drama
STARS: Christian Bale, Joel Edgerton, Ben Kingsley
BUY/RENT HERE!
www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/AS...
SUBSCRIBE for more all the latest Movie Clips here: bit.ly/31ByDAf
JOBLO UA-cam NETWORK:
► MOVIE TRAILERS: bit.ly/3rVdsq8
► MOVIE CLIPS: bit.ly/3k355GA
► STREAMING/TV TRAILERS: bit.ly/37ifDMz
► HORROR TRAILERS: bit.ly/3qsPxyc
► ANIMATED VIDEOS: bit.ly/3pqYiaJ
► SUPERHEROES: bit.ly/37nXgGd
► JOBLO VIDEOS: bit.ly/2Zp4WDG
► JOBLO HORROR VIDEOS: bit.ly/3bd7Voj
► CELEBRITY INTERVIEWS: bit.ly/3dk7ISN
► PARANORMAL NETWORK: bit.ly/2NvY58P
SUPPORT OUR CHANNEL - PURCHASE VIA OUR LINKS BELOW:
► AMAZON BEST SELLING MOVIES: amzn.to/3jWER8t
► MOST POPULAR POSTERS: bit.ly/3s4sTfJ
JOBLO MOVIE NEWS AND REVIEWS:
► www.joblo.com/
JOBLO ON SOCIAL MEDIA:
► JOBLO MOVIE NEWS (FACEBOOK): bit.ly/3bbIFPf
► JOBLO MOVIE TRAILERS (FACEBOOK): bit.ly/3dl9NxS
► HORROR MOVIE TRAILERS (FACEBOOK): bit.ly/3jTWZzX
► ARROW IN THE HEAD HORROR NEWS (FACEBOOK): bit.ly/3aqQ2D8
#ExodusGodsandKings #BattleofKadish - Фільми й анімація
![King Arthur | First Battle Scene [2004]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/vNOTYuUhWlI/mqdefault.jpg)
The legend says that if you focus well on something during a battle (like watching your adopted brother fighting) suddenly the enemies stop noticing you and forget about attacking you.
if You watching closely an arrow hit Ramses's shoulder but deflected by His Armor.. He's still completely vulnerable during the battle when took His time for a while thinking about killing Moses (The Adopted Brother)
@@sabaruengineering3843 why did he do think bout
Killing him?
I believe it was Sun Tzu who said that. Or Steven Seagal. One of them anyway.
@@kodesh1674 I think there was some sort of prophecy that was told to them before the battle that the one who saves the other will become the successor.
As dumb as your comment is, I give it a thumbs up for making me laugh. I always think the same thing, like do all the other soldiers have some kind of contractual agreement to let them duel it out or is it just hollywood being hollywood.
1st thought: "How did I miss that movie?"
Immediate 2nd thought: "Thank God I missed that movie".
same here! :D
The trailer looks amazing but the scenes are lack luster
Nah the movie is good. But as always you can't please all women.
@@do_not_rotateyour_phone3957 it's nice meeting you pleased woman.
Nah it is a good movie
The battle of Kadesh was one of the best recorded Bronze Age battle, was the largest recorded chariot engagement, and led to the first ever recorded international peace agreement. Ramses marched three divisions north against the Hittite Empire. His division was caught off guard by a Hittite division maneuvering behind the “old city” which hid their approach. Ramses was cut off but managed to fight his way out. The battle likely ended in a draw, however the Egyptian army withdrew so it was most likely a tactical defeat. Both rulers sold the battle as a victory to their respective kingdoms. This scene is not that.
Glad somebody has an idea!
Not true.. we won the battle and Ramses the second reassured our hegemony over Levant
@siman say Where are you from?
@siman sayWe call Egypt "om el dounya" mother of the world.. we dont think with racist mind setup like yours.. Egyptian is Egyptian whatever was his race, color or religion
@siman sayThat is not true.. hurrians never inhabited Egypt.. we are unique people in the middle east region.. still using words from our old langauge "ayoua.. wahaee.. Eouhaa.. Eyah" so who you are to identify who is Egyptians and who is not?.. East Europe.. from Ukraine maybe or you are not sure about your ancestors yourself
For anyone worried you may be caught unaware by a massive army charging towards you fear not, you would hear them well before they get close... And if they spend the entire time running at you, they wont make it close before they are exhausted. Stay Safe out there.
This is cavalry, though.. they are cheating by using horses
@@johngallagher9151 Horses get tired too my dude, especially horses carrying chariots with armored people on them
Thanks for that. Quite the relief
@@chrisbuesnell3428 You're more than welcome friend.
@@David-fd8hy not anywhere near as fast as a human with the equivalent weight. Also, ancient Egyptian chariots were made lightweight with flexible wood (I forget the names of the types) and 6 spoked wheels for bouncing over obstacles not for going through them. They were meant to move FAST and LIGHT while putting down a rain of arrows on the enemy. That is perfect for covering the distance in this scene and only being slightly winded.
The only part this movie gets right about the battle of Kadesh is Ramses being temporarily alone and apart from his troops. In the Egyptian account there is a moment when Ramses states, "No officer was with me, no charioteer, no soldier of the army, no shield-bearer."
The actual battle was not the Egyptians attacking the Hittites but the opposite as it was the latter who attacked the Egyptian camp. The Hittites eventually withdrew. Also considered a draw, the Egyptians suffered a tactical defeat as they were unable carry through with the plan to attack Kadesh.
Steel two handed swords in bronze age, damn this movie is a historians nightmare.
Egyptians used Iron though
But yeah that is shiny steel ahhaah
@@badfoody I was just wondering about that, lol.
people where aware of iron but the forging was lower quality than bronze so nobody wanted iron weapon ,iron age started wen a penury of tin happened and forced the people to develop proper forging Technik to make iron weapon .
@@johnsmith-yj2cn That's cool, never knew that.
@@badfoody
The Egyptians did not use iron in all of their wars
3000+ years of Ancient Egyptian history yet not one movie that could depict them accurately in a good way. Why ?
I loved the part when Moses says, 'I am Batman.'
0:14
Well, that's a tent fire waiting to happen..
My bro watching one frame per second
It’s crazy how good the camera quality was back then, yet security cams and alien sighting footage looks like it was shot Before Christ
😐
this had me dying😐
XDDDDDDDDDD
Very stupid comment
3:37 Bro just stabs a guy and keeps walking, without pulling the sword out.
what's the flying dirt at 4:30 just like two random flights of dirt, like a giant dog is digging under the fence off camera. So odd.
@@saoirse5308 i think they made that for the 3d effect in the cinema's
2:35 was that black guy a Nubian warrior
@@saoirse5308out of frustration a person bashed an object covered in dirt/mud to an enemy soldier's face, the swing was so powerful the excess dirt/mud from the object flew off to the guy in the chariots face, in this times adrenaline can boost your strength as if it is your last.
Ramses charioteer was probably like "bruh im still alive"
I love how many historical inconsistencies there are... like mounted cavalry, or mailcoat
Well Moses has a hill where god's gives him tablet ...
Well that's that.
There where mounted cavalry
Mailchains ...not so much ...
While in Egyptian warfare chariots were prominently used it’s a bit of a stretch to say they didn’t use mounted cavalry. 100% agree on the mail coat however. It’s the Bronze Age for a reason.
@@finaleclipse5742 Not a stretch at all, from some quick research it seems only few peoples (mainly Middle Eastern) we’re willing to go into battle on horseback. They didn’t have stirrups, saddles, riding cloths or anything so that’s why chariots were used.
Egypt perfected if not invented the chariot.
@@gravel_guppies4620 He meant on horseback. At the time things like stirrups and saddles weren’t invented so very, very few people rode directly on the horse.
I cant believe such a battle occurd in 2014. Atleast we managed to shoot this battle on camera
Gold scale armor, straight steel swords, lances with cloth banners ... in the Battle of Kadesh (1276 BC)? I don't think so.
Totally agree. It should be black and white only
a gold armor would weight 100kg
@@Herlander25 Exactly. This is pure Hollywood nonsense.
not true. that's exactly how it happened. i was there.
Agreed, pure hollywood. Where are the curved Khopesh blades?
1:04 why would archers yell "Fire!" to coordinate the release of their arrows in this era? This was before gunpowder.
...because it is a general word for 'shooting' in English language?
@@TheStrangerTom It wasn't back then. English would've yelled "Loose" instead.
ARCHERS AIM!! LOOSE!!
You fucking genius
“Ready , aim, , RELEASE “
@@jaredlandry When is that 'back then' supposed to be? In 13th century BC? :)
nothing shouts "kill me I'm the head of this army!" as someone wearing a golden scaled armour into battle. only missing two hype trumpets honking his arrival
Not "kill me", but "Watch me and my orders!"
@@AlexPovolotsky actually its both, a plus and a risk.
@@djavanalderromero you won't get pluses without risks. And after all leader is most often well protected.
And Loki horn helmet…can’t forget that
@@libatako those are accurate since tje bronze age had the most spiritual warriors of any age
How time changes cinema
In the movie "TEN COMMANDMENTS" from 1956 Moses was depicted as a great architect, directing the construction of monuments in honor of his adoptive father the Pharaon. But in "Exodus: Gods and Kings" he's a general and a great warrior
Nowadays epic battles entertain more than long talks
To be fair, this makes more sense. Tell me, why should I believe that an architect could lead a revolution, a war or be a saviour? It’s even in line with the tanuk, which refrences Moses as a general. If Moses really did exist, I find it unlikely that he would not be an architect. Hell, I find Prince of Egypt’s interuptation, with Moses being an more coming of age metaphor then a literal historical or biblical retelling more then Ten Commandents. Basically the way I see it, you want historical accuracy watch Exodus Gods and Kings, you want bibilical accuracy watch Ten Commadants and if you a fully good movie watch Prince of Egypt.
@@dylantennant6594 be ause msot of the Egyptian pharoahs focused on their land and what they had for a majority of their reigns and only spent war when they felt like they were unpopular and needed quick boosts (propaganda wins)
Same with the Romans, no need to fight wars when you can improve what you have and only go to war with people you can easily trample over for resources (Kadesh is also a loss for Egypt since the Hittites expanded later)
@@dylantennant6594 historical accuracy with this movie, yeah, lol
@@magniwalterbutnotwaltermag1479 well, kinda right to a certain point. The hittites also not advance as much they want it and suffered great losses. It was more like a strategic draw at certain level
Now imagine how much it's changed since the story was writen
Got to love the cavalry charge about 1000 years before the invention of the stirrup made that possible....There's a reason the ancients used chariots, because the saddle hadn't even been invented yet, making riding horseback all but impossible, let alone fighting from horseback.
They had cavalry charges before the stirrup. The reason they used Chariots is because at the time domesticated horse breeds hadn't been breed into proper warhorses like you picture from the medieval period.
Alexander the Great had heavy cavalry so did the Parphinas. But you are correct that there would not be any at Kadesh. The large force cavalry force was probably employed by Medes around 7 century BC.
Don't take it so seriously. It's just a movie. Be glad they weren't shouting "Fox-2" away.. and doing Missile launches from their Chariots and aiming Bazooka's. With todays Hollywood and Marvel's influence, anything is possible.
Alexander's Macedonian companion cavalry sat on a blanket and didn't use stirrups and were among the most effective cavalry force for a long period of time. Granted... that's some time after this battle. :P
@@deepconscious7741 Okay now I want a satire (if that sort of thing exists anymore) where they literally do that with chariots.
1:05 : "Fire!" MUHAHAHA
Christian Bale 😀 he is always lost in his own perfection ❤️🔥
Agreed. Great comment
"But Ramses is not dancing he does not dance at the Party" -Nacho
The ability to find a friend or foe on a battlefield of thousands never ceases to amaze me. Well done Exodus, Braveheart, The Patriot, etc.
I am Egyptian and I loved this battle
@@oscarc.3597 modern day Egyptians carry African blood. An arabic name but an Egyptian lineage.
@@oscarc.3597 you are a black guy ?
Yeah..in this battle the indogerman hetit imperium kick ass the Egypt back to Palestine..after us came the Persian.. the Greek..Rom..Byzantine.. Mameluck..Ottoman Turks..England..now Israel..Egypt was always a slave state! Never independent..cry silent
0:52 how the hell hard is it to say "Loose" instead of "Fire" when no one EVER said "Fire" in that context until well after 1475 and the first match lock. 🤦♂️
Yep, or they could have just said “shoot” instead. Both would work. Fire is just stupid.
Actually, "Fox-2 away" would have sounded better, so Hollywoodish. Logic, history & common sense take a holiday when they make movies.
@@deepconscious7741 In the name of historical accuracy. . . . . I could except "Fox-2 away" 😏
How the hell hard is it to understand that "fire" is a perfectly good way of English language to express "shoot."? Oooh, I forgot, they should have been speaking the CORRECT version of English that was spoken in 13th century BC. OH WAIT - the fucking language didn't even exist yet! Jesus...
@@TheStrangerTom "correct" would be correct, "CORRECT" is just shouting.
In retrospect, assuming they made the movie for people with about your IQ. . . . . "fire" is fine. 🙄 also Crayola Font in the title and sock puppets as historical figures . . . . .
A Welsh Moses and a Aussie Ramses, nice love history Hollywood style
Haha good one
Well since "race shouldn't matter" I don't see why itd bother anyone unless they're a racist or just so sick of their own life they feel the need to stir the pot over every little thing from behind a computer screen.
@@enigmaoriginal2665 it’s easy to say that when everything is white Washed! Ijs....
Just like a black queen of England or a black Norse God.
@siman say you people???? You people??? What black people??? And Moses I personally believe the original Hebrews, were black. The Jews we see there now are not the original Jews.
The amount of steel, Iron and modern swords, axes and so.
Also very few had horses large enough to ride, that's why they had chariots!
History cries in corner.
Fun fact: the HITTITES were the first to to use iron
One of my favorite fantasy movies out there
Idk if ur a troll or not but the Exodus was a real historical event
@@cosmic3854 Troll isn't real, just like this film.
@@piotrmontgomerytv7786 Prove it!
I am Christian and I think this is real but this movie is inaccurate
@@TigerVids531exactly!! Someone else finally agrees with me on this.. the movie is loaded with biblical inaccuracies. That’s Hollywood for ya though
Wow.. Look at the Egyptians, rocking all those medieval equipments in the Bronze Age 😂
Mailcoat at the Bronze Age… yeah right 😂
If the Egyptians had used chariot tactics like that then the (real) battle would not have been the draw it was, but a clear Hittite victory.
Hittite four horses chariots ?? Egyptian soldiers on horses ?? Hittite soldiers using a long Thracian sword ? Thats not ancient egyptian world !
My uncle was at the battle, he said it didn't go down like that
can we all appreciate those dirt throws. Thanks steve for throwing dirt so the shot could look epic 4:29
Good catch.
Rofl 🤣
Wish we had more of this in the movie
Kadesh não tem nada a ver com isso. A batalha é empolgante mas Ramses não era tolo. A batalha não foi contra selvagens mas contra hititas que estavam em seu território. O Egito disputava com os hititas a fortaleza de Kadesh próximo de Alepo na Síria do Norte. Haviam 5 divisões egípcias de 5 a 10 mil homens cada e uma divisão a mais, a Ne'arin. Ramsés quase venceu mas passou o dia lutando pela vida porque os hititas atacaram de surpresa. Dispersaram a divisão Ra que fugiu para o acampamento da divisão Amon onde o Faraó estava preparando cerco. A divisão Ptah e a Seth chegaram depois para a luta e se depararam com o Faraó lutando em pessoa, rodeado pelo que restou das divisões Amon e Ra. A divisão Ne'Arin chegou por trás da linha hitita e os fez fugir. Nesse dia até príncipes sírios morreram afogados no Rio Orontes que ficava próximo. As reservas hititas observaram seus carros serem destruídos por completo. No dia seguinte o Faraó estava a frente do exército completo para derrotar a infantaria hitita de 37 mil homens mas acabaram em um cessar fogo porque o Egito tinha que lutar contra líbios e os hititas contra os povos do mar. Passaram mais 20 anos em batalhas por Dapur e Damasco até que assinaram o primeiro tratado de paz da história. Isso sim foi Kadesh.
No computers, smartphones and other modern stuff, just people living a moment.
It's funny how you can make actors do anything if you pay them enough.
Gotta pay them bills
This is called Capitalism for poor people.
everyone has a price
Puppets
Yeah, you'd do it too.
Amo l'Egitto 🇪🇬 dall'Italia 🇮🇹 siamo uno di fronte all'altro nel Mediterraneo e questa è una cosa meravigliosa🇪🇬🇮🇹❤
Horse archers, sabres..., linear formations..., strong bows... from a throusand to 2 thousand years still to go.
Joel 'Ramses' Edgerton who'd a thunk it. Suspension of disbelief is a key factor for this watch
The ancients used chariots because the horses were not large and strong enough (yet) at the time to carry a single armed soldier into battle. Once strong enough horses have been bred, chariot use stopped as cavalry was superior to chariots in all aspects. This battle depicts large formations of cavalry next to chariots which would make no sense in any army.
This was true originally, but chariots and cavalry overlapped greatly. For instance, Alexander the Great fought both chariots and cavalry at the battles of Gaugamela and the Hydapes, among others.
@@SahintheFalconet what you mention is exactly the period when the chariots ended (943 years, or almost a millenia later in Gaugamela, 331 BC - vs the battle of Kadesh, 1274 BC).
A millennia had to pass for cavalry to develop to that level, to challenge and replace chariots.
No that actually show that your theory is not correct. Chariots are not preferred due to there is no strong horse bred. Even the donkey can carry a man. That is not about that. Chariots carry many men. For example on that battle Hitit chariots was carrying 2 warriors and egyptians was 3. So during one of them riding the horses the rest using spears, swords and arrows to the enemy. In addition those are effective for mobility. easily get in and get off. Also some of them has a spike on their wheels which also quite effective to kill on foot enemy. So even during Roman time chariots was still in use. @@andraslibal
@@Oguzstyler he is correct on why they were originally used (horses were too small, yes some animals could carry a man for labor but not with armor with the endurance and speed required to be superior to chariots in formation at battle speed), he is mostly correct on cavalry being better in all aspects. they were only specialty units after that, and i believe there was only one recorded battle where the bladed wheels were somewhat effective, i want to say there were only a handful of total recorded uses ever) until then they were kind of elite units similar to heavy horse in the late medieval period
I love this movie
I love reading all of the comments about white dudes playing Egyptians but won't say a thing when a black dude plays a Greek or a black woman plays the queen of England
But Egyptians were White. They ARENT Sub Saharan Africans as all DNA testing shows. They are descended from the Indo-European migration from Germany 30,000 years ago
Which movie did a black person play a Greek or Queen of England?
@@thegadflygang5381 Put the crystal meth down you people be killing me with that nonsense!
@@thegadflygang5381 Huh? The Egyptians are a Semitic speaking people throughout history their close relatives have been those who share common ancestry to the Semitic branch of speakers. The Afro-Asiatic languages. Migration came from Caucasus, the near east, and Mesopotamia throughout history. Please don't give false information.
@@thegadflygang5381 ehh yes and no. The Nubians invaded, took control and mated with a lot of Egyptians. So they do have some Sub Saharan in their blood.
Best movie ever
Ah, yes, I remember this in Exodus chapter 497 starting on verse 9000... :/
Yeah steel, iron, and the Egyptian chariots wheels are supposed to have 6 spokes, not 8. Not very historically accurate.
Especially the race hahhaha
In the very last picture it really looks like two dudes just threw dirt from both sides into the front of the camera :D!
I agree with you
Wow 😁😁
You could call it the battle of Kadesh all you want, but this is not the battle of Kadesh!
No it is not! This is Hollywood shit!
And the battle of the Pyramids (1798) took place 9 miles away from the actual Great Pyramids of Giza. So what?
Nobody fights like that when their is attacking you form defencinve formation.
Well filmed, congratulations to the director
Ridley Scott needs to do series work I think.
歴史的なエジプトとヒッタイトとの戦闘シーン、具体的で面白かった。
Western Europeans with British accents in Bronze Age Egypt
And movie cameras to film it all.
😆
@@joshuahand407 underrated comment 😆
@ENGLISH KNIGHT Because most Israelis are white converts from east Europe 🤡
@@joshuahand407 *When Disney character turns black*
Whites: *Riot*
*When entire historical civilizations are white washed*
White people: It’s just a movie bruh
Terrific Calvary charge considering the stirrup wasn’t invented until the 7th century by Frankish knights.
Ikr. Chariots never charge towards the enemy. Chariots hit and run, keep distance from the enemy. Sometimes the warriors dismount and engage in melee, while the drivers wait in the back to pick the warriors and retreat in a moment's notice. But, at least they got the sizes right. Egyptian chariots are smaller (suitable for 1-2 people) whereas Hittite chariots are bigger and slower (suitable for 3 people).
@@yavuzkoroglu7792 Yep, a single chariot cost a fortune. It would be the worst day of their campaign even if they lost just a few chariot. Aren't no way they gonna waste it in a charge directly into spearwall.
Love that movie
Ese no es el empleo correcto de un carro de guerra Egipcio, ellos se limitarían a acercarse a los enemigos y llenarlos de flechas, jamás chocarían con una formación militar si no fuera estrictamente necesario, eso anularía su principal fortaleza que era lanzar proyectiles.
How brave a king he was in front of the army.... Wow
2014? Wow, I never even heard about this movie. I can see now why.
They showed Hittites like bunch of bandits. They had advanced civilisation like Egypt actually. And I don't thing that Moses was fight in Kadesh. But it is true, both Egyptians and Hittites made this war out their territory, yet Egyptians made a surprise attack and won the battle and entire Levant territory(Syria, Israel, Lebanon).
Of course a lot black centrists who had no idea about the real history are/were angry about casting, but casting was spot on. Hittites were speaking extinct European language. And ancient Egyptians were originally white African.
Are those supposed to be Hittites? Hardly.
HITTITES are the ANCESTOR of the TURKS
wow I never saw this movie before, but I think I will pass. If all the battle scenes are this unrealistic it would have to have a wonderful story line to be worth watching.
There are many inaccuracies in this portrayal. However, it does make for a great cinematic effect
“What’s that giant dust cloud off in the horizon?”
*says no one ever in historical movies*
such a beautiful morning ruined by such rudeness.
Just about the only thing they got right was that there was fighting in the Hittite camp and the chariots did get caught up in it.
nice clip though, and movie still nice to look on.
"P-51, Cadillac of the skies!!"
What happened to the Egyptian Kopesh? Also, those are a lot of banners.
How many banners do you wish my lord?
Yes.
yes, and Egyptian war chariots were too light for direct assault, they were more of missile moving platform.
@@gokhanpalabiyik Insert "Mount, and Blade: Bannerlord"
Watches movie made in Hollywood for the general audience
History fans: iTs So HoLlYwoOd
why does history have to be dumbed down for general audiance?
@@teakwondochest3287 the general audience is dumb like that question. $ comes before historical accuracy
@@spookysockmonkey4605 If they wanted $ so much they wouldn't have bothered with the cavalry charge and it would be far more historically accurate. Whoever the animal vendor is in Hollywood needed someone to dump their money on the movie's horse budget and they didn't have enough money for the real number of chariots involved in the battle.
@@Zachomara they made money my guy. The general audience wants action not history
"Maryannu" the chariot nobles. But it was so uncommon that cavalry attacks in bronze age. Because cavalry charges were started in iron age.
Glory egypt♥️♥️🇪🇬
The only KING 👑 is the TURKS 🇹🇷☝️💪
He’s Batman.
Kids who don't read history
"The past was so much better"
*the past
The actual Bronze Age was 100x worse of course
War is so glamorous ... until you're the one that get's slashed, stabbed, or pierced.
ahh miss those days.. .when i dont have a care in the world.
Hollywood: “We need diversity in our historical films, where are all of the POC Vikings”?
Also Hollywood: “Yes Christian Bale as Moses, yes, that is good”.
I have not watched this movie and I am happy now: make-up wearing men with laminate armour, riding horses with stirrups during hight of Egypt - it is too much even for movies.
Glad to see we're finally gonna make the Biblical Cinematic Universe a thing hahaha
lo mejor de la película
everybody is history expert until their views are represented in the movie then they go wild like everybody else
Kadesh deserves better man. Its of so much significance.
2:33 the classic christian bale scream
1:32 Moses leading Set division on the flank
This movie is great but they really need to make an Ad Astra 2. That movie was amazing with such cool plot twists. Up until COVID a group of us watched Ad Astra every weekend at the cheap theatre. There was 15-20 of us and we managed to keep the movie in the theatres for over a whole year playing every Saturday. Our goal was to make it last as long as possible, now that moment has fizzled out. Hopefully we can get it up and running again. If you want to see an Ad Astra 2 let me know! We have a fan club you can join. Ad Astra should have swept the Oscars but unfortunately people have shit taste in movies.
Amazing how, in this MASSIVE, epic, beautiful opening sequence ... not one bit of that music was remotely memorable. As opposed to Gladiator, which had theme after theme after theme introduced in that opening battle sequence.
They all look very.... Hollywood
Film complet svp
Whoever made this has no idea about how battles are fought
Yeah, this depiction of the battle of Kadesh is not historically accurate. There are plainty of anachronisms as well. And even some aspects are tottaly surreal, like the use of Egyptian light chariots to punch through enemy lines. At about 1:22 all these chariots would probably wheel right to gain distance again, before closing in again, while the archers would continue raining down arrows from afar. Still, this is the best representation of a bronze age battle, to date!!!! EVER!!! I'd wish all the scenes making their way to the screen were half as good as this one! In hopes of seeing something accurate as well as spectacular, someday.
Every time, every time hollywood thinks old, she immediately thinks about leather. Leather everywhere ... Including ridiculous leather scale armor. For the love of God. The person will take the trouble to cut small pieces of leather and sew on a piece of leather. Without offering any extra protection like that, it would be much easier to put 2 pieces of leather right away!
They must think that we will be happy simply because they left a main character with a helmet all the time! For those who really want to know how the battle of Kadesh went, I followed the link to the video for "Kings and Generals"
ua-cam.com/video/9b_Ab9GGb6g/v-deo.html
The leather scale armor is a stable of Egyptian weaponry since before the reign of Ramses II.
not only for people but for war horses as well.
Modern tests have shown that the scales design is perfect for stopping arrows, and offers much better protection than single piece armor,while at the same time preserving freedom of movement for the wearer.
The concept of multiple pieces instead of a single piece even if the single piece is thicker, is also well known in the modern ballistics protection industry. even tanks use spaced armor instead of having a single layer of armor like the old days.
A leather scale cuirass would be better than just two layers of leather stacked, since scales overlap. It would be more like three layers of leather everywhere
Not to mention the leather used for scales and the one for backing would be different things
E 0
Steal swords in the bronze age?
They were rare made of meteorite usually no longer than a long knife there is even a pare of identical daggers from a bronze age Egyptian tomb one in bronze the other in meteorite iron.
You can always steal swords.
@@sonofblessed lol you win
@@sonofblessed
Bruh lol
Just be grateful there weren't explosions during the chariot crashes
Like the doctor against the pandemic 👨⚕👍
you said no addictive , yet you just said you keep going back to it LOL
Impressive battle scene. Miscasting made it laughable.
Had the Hittites pulled their reserves out of the city, they would have won
A little late for advice
Your advice came 3,305 years too late.
I know I showed the first comment to my wife and we both had a nice little laugh. Very witty 🙂
Monday morning quarter back only 171, 860 mondays late!
*If you thought the historical inaccuracies were terrible...don't even get me going about the biblical inaccuracies !*
Top
Someone explain me why there are iron weapons and armor in a period where they were still fighting with bronze?
Because make believe. Sheesh!
its called Hollywood
Mounted cavalry with stirrups in the bronze age? No. Just no....
La ilahe illallah muhammad en Resûlullah☝️🌹🌙❤️
Horses were too small to support a man in armor. No cavalry were available in this time period, hence chariots. Also, the archers ought to call "loose" to discharge arrows and not "fire." Impressive scenery wasted by lack of research.
По ходу я его не видел. Если кто в курсе, под скажите пожалуйста название фильма.
Исход: короли и боги.
@@I_0_8_0_I спасибо
Повезло, что не видел. Рвотный рефлекс при просмотре этой байды никто не отменял...
@@user-kq2hr3kj3k рвотный рефлекс у меня вырабатывается при фильмах снятых "Михалковым"
@@user-vh3qh6gq7z Этот не хуже. Те же яйца, только в профиль