Why Cabinet should be scaled down - Bernstein

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 19 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 28

  • @kusaselihlengubane8984
    @kusaselihlengubane8984 5 місяців тому +6

    The lady just said everything I've been thinking. Why so many ministers? Who honestly should under one portfolio. The cabinet should be no more than 20 Ministers maximum.
    Another thing is the State Security Agency. It should not be in president's office. The SSA should be protecting not only the country from foreign & domestic threats but also from the government itself. If it's being controlled by government then no wonder the crime is so high.

    • @wilsondikgale5823
      @wilsondikgale5823 5 місяців тому

      It's set up that way to protect the President and to allow to weaponize it at will😢

  • @MzamoAdoons372
    @MzamoAdoons372 5 місяців тому +6

    Fifteen ministers will be enough, not this huge choir

  • @amandafrost327
    @amandafrost327 5 місяців тому +4

    Lovely Ann.

  • @ralphnaidoo6386
    @ralphnaidoo6386 5 місяців тому +4

    Do away with deputy ministers

  • @seanoconnor2161
    @seanoconnor2161 5 місяців тому +1

    Perhaps Ann should be in Cabinet? She’s brilliant

  • @mapitsithamaga-xn3oi
    @mapitsithamaga-xn3oi 5 місяців тому +2

    The new President will have to set a tone, well said Ann

  • @Yolinda9077
    @Yolinda9077 5 місяців тому +2

    Agreed. The money can be utilized elsewhere.....

  • @karenj8406
    @karenj8406 5 місяців тому +1

    Governance should be a priority. Quality of ministers are important, not quantity

  • @wandiletembe
    @wandiletembe 5 місяців тому +2

    Its just a salary for them. They will never allow that.

  • @thembinkosimngxale7580
    @thembinkosimngxale7580 5 місяців тому +3

    Between the Ministry of Public Enterprises, the DMRE, and the Ministry of Electricity; who exactly is the jockey to the horse that is Eskom? If my question is as baffling to you as it is to me, then Ann and her team are spot on!

    • @diederik4857
      @diederik4857 5 місяців тому

      Perfect example. 😂😂

  • @hgfku-tn6hb
    @hgfku-tn6hb 5 місяців тому +9

    Cabinet can't be reduced because it's a form of employment and not to serve people

    • @lindiwephafudi6921
      @lindiwephafudi6921 5 місяців тому

      That’s why Zuma during his time increased the cabinet .
      It was about making those who support him get jobs

  • @juniormolefe3046
    @juniormolefe3046 5 місяців тому +1

    Good ppl 😂she means; don't touch land & mineral status quo

  • @omphilwemoja3813
    @omphilwemoja3813 5 місяців тому +1

    It is time tax payer's money be used effectively, not to sustain lifestyles.

  • @desstanbridge8283
    @desstanbridge8283 5 місяців тому +1

    President has to put on his big boy pants and do the right thing now.

  • @roshneeshunmagum1945
    @roshneeshunmagum1945 5 місяців тому +1

    ALL DEAD WOOD MUST GO.

  • @ThembaTsela
    @ThembaTsela 5 місяців тому

    Copy Norway, need 24 Ministers
    What is the role of 2nd Deputy Minister. The IFP only has 17 or 400 MPs, Hlabisa is not Cabinet Material, but can give him sports & culture, and related.

  • @Rushdeen
    @Rushdeen 5 місяців тому +1

    Cutting the cabinet will remove smaller parties and therefore not comprehensively represent all peoples' views. Decrease the number of larger parties as long as all parties voted in are represented.

    • @Sebiner
      @Sebiner 5 місяців тому +1

      They are talking about downsizing the executive, not Parliament. I'm not sure, but I think they would need to amend the Constitution in order to downsize Parliament.

    • @diederik4857
      @diederik4857 5 місяців тому

      @@Sebinercorrect

  • @natesnautical
    @natesnautical 5 місяців тому

    You’ver thrown God out of the schools and society, morality honesty and integirty is not at the order of the day. Things will get worse before they get better.