Cmon don't give starfield the hate speech just because some famous people are bad talking the game! Look at this game like the first time you played skyrim! The exploration and free will in this game is insaaane, and btw, people hate andromeda too just because yourtubers, played myself, and for me it's the strongest in the series! Several problems that plagued the older games are fixed and never before the game is so fun -with a good history! And Starfield got its "bethesta open campaing" style, i just can't get bored with all the quest with deep lore and some even with emotional investing! Play both games, then get your opnion, just don't hate on something you haven't played yet! Cheers!
The reason people hate it because of the worst optimization on pc and the graphics are not even up to the mark if a gtx 1660 super rtzx 2060, 3050, gtx 1080 cant run this game on high 60 fps their is something wrong with it
I played 10 hours, practically every door that the player enters into an environment, whether external or internal, has loading, it looks exactly like Skyrim in 2011, meaning there has been almost no technical evolution in the engine. This game is nothing like Skyrim, it's more like a Fallout 4 DLC in space, but with worse physics and worse AI. Andromeda is terrible too, but its better then Starloading: Fallout 4 DLC. Wasted money.
@@bilal6865 theres a lot of reasons, why people hate it, the poor optmization for PC is just one of the reasons... but theres plenty others, like the space flight mechanics of the game, that is dumb compared with other games of the genre, by the way, the comparison with Andromeda was pretty accurate, because Andromeda was trying to copy the randonly generated planets like NMS did, the diference is that Bioware realize that all they could do was exactly what Starfield did, just some big worthless tiles and dumb space combat like Starfield so they simply decided to scrap it and simplify. Altought combat in Andromeda was the best of the entire franchise, the story suffered most with this, even tough the story in Andromeda was still great than it is in Starfield, and Andromeda story is the worst of the whole franchise (sometimes i get the impression that Andrormeda was supposed to be a prequel about the First Contact War, is mostly a feeling that somehow Bioware got the script for the FCW and decide to changed to make it 600 years in the future of ME trilogy in a completely different galaxy), and yet, it is still better than Starfield story, at least has a far more interesting lore on it. Also combat in Starfield was even compared with combat in Fallout 4 and it didn't hold up, is even worst when it is compared with games like Cyberpunk 2077 combat, wich, may not be the most awesome combat of all ( i prefer much more the approch of Borderlands 3 on combat), you can't deny that CP77 is clearly the winner in this regard, wich makes the combat in Starfield outdated with a jetpack, and by the way, combat in Andromeda is superb, is basically the only great thing about the game, but yeah. Exploration in Starfield sucks! Seriously, anyone defending the exploration in this game is nuts... i been playing No Man's Sky recently and i tell you, theres CAVES bigger and more interesting than all tiles of Starfield combined, and this are just caves, in NMS you can LITERALLY explore all the whole damn planets your ship can touch on the ground, and did i also mentioned that you can explore planets on vehicles in NMS, you can even use a mech to explore caves if you wish! How is exploration in Starfield? You have to land on a tile after some loadscreens and cutscenes, then run for minutes in the direction of a marker, yeah... Starfield feels great, isn't?
The dialogue is so bad that it drug the experience as a whole down, but I still really enjoyed Andromeda. The combat is really fun and while most of the crafting systems are broken, it was really fun researching new weapons
@@OGbrundle Actually, real ME fans see Andromeda for what it is. Wasted potential. Good premise with good ideas, but badly written and poorly executed. And you can't deny that Andromeda has some of, if not the best, gameplay in the series.
I’m playing ME Andromeda on PS5 and it’s fantastic !! no bugs …nothing… and the missions and locations are pretty cool , after 1 hour of gameplay..it gets pretty immersive !
@@ismbeatz it's fine imo. I definitely wouldn't call it bad even for a mass effect it's just they didn't do enough world building. I guess it was maybe also a little safe for mass effect.
ME andromeda was a way better game then starfield as space exploration RPG, and it was made 6 years ago. despite its flaw during launch with bugs etc, after they patch everything its very enjoyable. the combat system and graphic still beat most of the game made today.
Do it. I’ve been playing it for a while. Tryna immerse myself as a “mercenary” kind of Ryder. Using the maverick set basically. Honestly feels great. Always love when sci fi games has mercenary looking sets as apposed to only soldier and space gear.
Andrômeda is 100x better indeed The gameplay is really good and it feels good to play despite the flaws, starfield has no good gameplay mechanics at all, game is stuck in 2009 with all the jank Storywise andrômeda is not perfect, but has some good moments and quests Starfield on the other hand has one of the most horrible and boring stories I have ever seen And he'll andrômeda looks better as well with a better art design, starfield has empty maps with rocks and looks like dog crap, and it runs like shit
@@sadarumhogai9337 As a big Mass Effect fan, I will wholeheartedly disagree with every single thing you just said. Andromeda was awful. The worst, most one dimensional characters, terrible excuse for a plot or lack thereof, even after they "fixed" it the characters still look like Shrek, it was boring AF, and the combat just turned in to Gears Of War (which I personally despise). One of the best descriptions I've seen is that Mass Effect 1-3 was an epic space opera, and Andromeda is the Marvel spin off. Starfield to me feels like what Mass Effect SHOULD have evolved in to, in fact the similarities between the two are unignorable. Also, I still don't get how anybody is surprised or shocked at what Starfield is, they were pretty damn transparent before it released, people want it to be something it's not. My main complaint with Starfield is that it is very PG in comparison to all of Bethesda's other titles.
I think both games are great! In Starfield my favorite thing is space travel and first person view, in Mass Effect Andromeda my favorites are it's tps view and the scanning function! What are YOUR favorites? Let me know in the comments! :)
No Man's Sky also have first person view, EVEN to vehicles, so i much prefer NMS, over this two, but if i have to pick one it would be Andromeda, wich i already have it, and i even moded to have first person view (altough this also screw the beauty and hair mods i also downloaded for Sarah Ryder... Overal Andromeda is a better game, it just doesn't reach the same hights than the OG ME trilogy, Starfield completely sucks in my opinion, i came from the space sim genre and to me, Starfield looks pathetic.
just play x4 or elite dangerous or whatever space sim (even old poor tomorrow war) and meet the fact: space travel in starfield is decoration witout anything behind
I prefer Andromeda combat system and the fact it's a real RPG. Starfield isn't an RPG at all. You can use all weapons. The only difference is that you can play a moral character or a criminal one and that'it. An engineer in Mass Effect uses rifles and pistols and can damage robotic enemies. An engineer in Starfield is like a soldier or an assassin: you can use stealth as much as heavy weapons or rifles and pistols, no difference. Starfield is pretty but it's not a RPG game. Oh, I forgot how much idiotic is the AI with your companions always coming in my line of fire and getting hurt or blocking my way while I'm looting. I don't like that Andromeda main missions are interminable, really very very long but it's a BioWare habit
2:14 Note andromeda also has a “shoulder swap” mechanic where you can go left handed and have your camera move left. Cover is genuinely seamless and breaking from cover and rushing a weakened enemy or a confused squad had never been better. And if you need to disengage or rush you have a jet Dodge. Infact depending on your specialization it can be a biotic dodge. Creating more distance (usually on the either pure biotic ones where you need a lot to distance. Or the close range biotic ones where you need to rush and get out fast) And the game the best aim assist I can think of. The snap on is very very minor and usually you’re out of range for the snap anyway. And it’s mainly just normal aim assist. Unfortunately you cannot turn of aim snap and keep aim assist. But you can turn off aim assist all together. Along with that this game as lovely armor. My favorite is the maverick set. It has that badass mercenary look. It also specializes in picking off targets with headshots. Perfect for soldiers who enjoy ripping the head off of anyone too cocky to peak for too long.
I remember everyone dissing Mass Effect Andromeda for its crappy facial animation on release. Why do I not see so many people dissing Bethesda for all the shit facial animations that game has?
Each time I watch Starfield I have to laugh how blazingly stupid the enemy AI is ... Andromeda looks better in many ways which is amazing when you realize it's 6 years old game ... Although the ship interiors look amazing, Starfield game engine appears outdated ...
4:06 You can get on the ship take off and from space activate the ship's scanner and travel to a planet that is in the same system. What you did was fast travel. So comes the cinematic takeoff and landing.
Man, if by beating Starfield you mean doing the main mission, then you haven't played Starfield seriously and you don't even know what the game is worth. Sorry if I sound too aggressive, but even Skyrim's main mission was a little boring and what made the game spectacular were all the other missions and the exploratory nature that the game offered. The same thing happens with Starfield! That's why I'm as addicted to this game as I was (and still am) to Skyrim (over 4000 hours of gameplay!). In fact, it seems to me that many of the big UA-camrs and other critics who reviewed this game only played the main mission and little else, and therefore left with a not very good impression of the game. Time will tell whether or not I'm right.
@@letsplayskyrimle9391 Crimson fleet totally worth it, Ryujin is Okaysh story, Vanguard is also Okay , but at 130h Starfield got me bored , will leave Free planets for 2nd pkaythrough or sth
People should try Andromeda now, its very good game, i just played it for the first time yesterday and it was definitely not what i was expecting, in a good way. The story is okay, the game is excellent.
I'll start by saying my 2 favourite series when it comes to gaming are Mass Effect and Fallout . I'm 10 hours into Starfield and the game is ok , but I had higher expectations . I've actually played Andromeda again recently and I still got hooked , I'm still struggling to connect with Starfield . Graphics seem a bit outdated , dialogue is bland , story kind of mediocre , space exploration...I'm not even gonna go into that . But it makes me miss games like ME2 or Fallout NV , Starfield doesnt even come close to those games .
Right now, I'm 98,4 hours into the game and I can tell you that you still don't even have the slightest idea what the game is! It's a game that takes a long time to discover and understand how it works. Don't worry about doing the main mission, it's not a priority. Discover the game by completing other missions and exploring the planets. On the surface of the planets, turn on the scanner and start exploring. Planet Jemison alone has perhaps more things to explore than all of Skyrim. And I know what I'm talking about, because I have 4200 hours in Skyrim! Seeing if I can surpass 100 hours on Starfield today!
Starfield is so fucking boring i cant force myself to play Andromeda is so much better not that good as Iconic Shepard but its still MASS EFFECT story is interesting gameplay very good (love biotic) but Starfield ... so uncomfortable to play and as i said boring :/ guys im really trying ..
i dont know what are u talking about but i played morrowind oblivion skyrim and now trashfield have you even been on this world when morrowind came out ?:P and im always playing on pc @@ghostrider2698 Just WOW people cant be objective these times , i just said my own opinion about this game is trash there are many OLD GAMES better with graphic and story without glitch than this game if u like it then ok have fun but in my opinion you are blind , bethesda doing always bad work and modders fixing their games
Considering how old ME Andromeda is it shows how advanced the Frost engine rendering was. They need to fix the crappy Fallout 4 leftover interface too. Too funny a game that much older is still better lol.
Well, I'll play later Starfield, but I must say I love Andromeda. I'm discovering it atm, and of course play with multiple mods (especially to reduce scanning, improve graphics), it's a great game. I loved the ME Legendary Edition too. For me , they're in the same universe, but definitely different experiences. Also, playing a woman in Andromeda is better. For Starfield, I could compare when I'll play it end 2024, properly modded and patched as usual. One thing, from what I see as a space rpg, Starfield seems to be okay. Regarding pure space exploration, No Man Sky is the best experience, regarding space combat, no game comes close Elite Dangerous imho, but these 2 games suffer from lacks of plot, significant characters etc. In fact the perfect game would be a Mass Effect characters-wise and story-wise/No Man Sky's exploration/Elite Dangerous's simulation mix but such a game is litteraly impossible and would cost hundreds of millions of dollars ^^ I wanted Star Citizen to be such a game but it seems so lack great characters/plot atm, we'll see.
There is currently some idiotic trend in new games where everything appears to be shrouded in some haze or mist. It is fucking horrible. Devs stop doing that. Crystal clear clarity like in Mass Effect is what is desired. Look at the rooms in Starfield. Every room seems to have some kind of cloud or mist...
Andromeda's script was a failure although the setting and premise of the characters was good, the graphics are great to this day and the combat ... the rest is mediocre.
it still has a better story than starfield lmao. people call it a failure because they keep comparing it to the epic story of commander Shepard's journey to thwart galactic annihilation. If you keep comparing it to the OG trilogy, of course it's not as good. But on its own, it's definitely got a better story and side-quests than many game out there.
andromeda is underrated, it gathered so much organized hate. starfield is a bugthesda game so nobody is surprised, people even excuse it for that ... unfair
I noticed that Starfield was just like Andromeda when I first watched the preview at the Xbox Showcase. I disregarded the bad publicity on Andromeda and, loving BioWare, I started playing it a couple of years ago and I enjoyed it a lot. I couldn't understand the bad reviews on a very good game. Now I see that I was right about Starfield (which I bought in premium edition and I am currently playing it) and that Andromeda aged very well (now it's 6 years old and last generation consoles). It's a pity that Andromeda was considered a little failure. I think it was just an emotional reaction by the gamers expecting to play as Shepard forever
Both starfield and Andromeda are garbage games in isolation. Huge waste of money and time. Simple as. And it has nothing to do wanting to play as shepard.
Yet many 2023 games can't pull of the details and psychics with so many items as Starfield because the engines can't handle it. Bethesda made different choices to prioritize.
@@MuscledRMH The vegetation looks awful, though. Just looking at the trees, Far Cry 2 (2008) and Crysis (2007) did that already better. Especially the interaction of the leafs with light. Lighting in Starfield looks also quite flat tbh. Certainly some years behind a lot of other games. Look at Far Cry Primal or Dying Light which came out in 2016. Way better lighting models in those games. Another game from that year is Homefront The Revolution. For all the issues it had at launch (some similar to Starfield like frame rate and some wonky physics here and there), the visuals were pretty impressive. The dynamic lighting model and weather model were pretty impressive. Really atmospheric. Especially in night scenes they did a spectacular job. It really feels like it's dark and there's a nice contrast between lighted areas and dark areas. Not like in many games, where you just get a washed out colour scheme with a blue hue to it. NPC models... well, there Starfield doesn't look that spectacular either. Neither in their texturing, animations, or facial expressions, if I'm honest. The ai also looks quite brain-dead, but I guess that's just a symptom that a lot of open world games have these days. Even Ubisoft (with all their open world games) managed to downgrade ai in every Far Cry title. With Far Cry 2 having by far the best ai of all Far Cry games... Some things in Starfield are nicely upgraded, though, like the materials model and how it interacts with things like lighting and fluids. And texture quality looks solid for the most part from what I can tell (character models excluded). It certainly looks more consistent and cohesive than Fallout 4 (truth be told, that was a pretty big issue with Fallout 4, so good that at least that has been fixed).
Andromeda is the one of the best game i have ever played, story, unique planet exploration, vault taiming, exploring, combats, graphics, story are excellent
Starfield is not a bad game but its not an AAA+ Game. Thats what Bethesda needs to know, and the Copy and Paste bases with the same items in the same place is so such a pain in the ass. Really, Bethesda did a real bad job with Starfield, I really hope they will improve with the DLC which we will sadly need to pay for having It and feel a real complete game! I even dont start with the bugs which is normal today!
I kind of love Andromeda. Sure the story and characters aren’t as compelling as the Trilogy, but I never got tired of the gameplay and exploration. Also, I’m glad they got rid of the Paragon/Renegade scales so you’re free to use the conversation wheel however you want.
You can say what you say. I like to play Starfield over hours. I like in Bethesda games the switch from first- to third-person. You can build you bases and ships with improved equipment. And the design looks grown-up, not a teenie cartoon session.
If you remove your helmet in the moon you would be dead in a couple of seconds, and even if you don't die, you would be baddly hurt, you can kiss goodbye to sight because you would be blind as a bat for the rest of your life. For once, Andromeda does takes space serious, even in those planets that HAVE atmosphere you WOULD have differences in pressure, temperature, radiation... sure it has "safe" areas (that honestly i think Bioware should have worked this properly, but yeah... Mass Effect is also wayy more cinematic than Starfield... Actually the FPS combat in Starfield SUCKS too, i had a mod to play Andromeda in FPS, and let me tell you the game play is magnificent in first person on Andromeda, even more with the cool power that you can have (biotic charge is the best one), but when you compare Starfield combat with Cyberpunk 2077 combat well... it sucks... By the way, in the mod i had for ME:A, you can see the body of the character (you can see your body in FPS on Starfield). Water physics i find a pointless comparison, BUT is good note here that in PREVIOUS Bethesda titles you DO have even UNDERWATER exploration, Starfield is literally a downgrade in this regard. Yes you can land "everywhere" in Starfield... but frankly, it's all so repetitve, that it is pointless it would be MUCH better if Starfield had just a more hand crafted content, and in Andromeda even being the worst game of ME franchise at least every location you can land, is unique. Nope the new Crysis is Cyberpunk 2077, Starfield is just poorly optmized.
Honestly, I prefer that Bethesda's games continues to have even a slightly dated graphics if this means they continue to use their engine, with even the useless objects with a physics, I like it so much, especially in comparison to those games with graphics as beautiful as a Callisto Protocol, or Cyberpunk, or even RDR2, but less or in the worst zero interaction with the environment. I think objects are an important and underrated part of the environments, because they have physics and you can interact with them, and their presence in game worlds is like it makes me feel like everything is more "tangible". However, Andromeda isn't that bad in the end either, I like both.
on PC you can have some nice Mods for Andromeda, better looking chars, better controls, better AI. Its not that much Bethesda give you in terms of modding but it make Andromeda more fun & enjoyable. i like it
I don’t usually compliment nor comment and very rarely watch such vids cuz I think todays creators are just cringe kids but man, this was REALLY well done comparision. All I wanted to see was in it. Thanks man. M
media can compare watever they want. If starfield was half the quality in terms of graphics, i would rate it the same way, and play it the same way. starfield offers a big sense of the unexpected, the gameplay where you can "be whoever you want to be", "do whatever you want to do", has no rival.
I want a Starfiels vs PhantasyStar from the 8 bit MasterSystem Video...two Space Adventure RPGs from theyr Time...One was revulutionary and Stunning for its Time😂
I don't play either of these games, but it seems like you're desperately straw-manning for the sake of proving the game you prefer superior despite literally no one else comparing the two or caring lol
The majority of comments on here are from PlayStation fanboys upset they can’t play the masterpiece that is Starfield😂😂 It’s ok fanboys, I’d probably be a little salty too! 😂😂
I left Starfield level 22 - (boring AF game) - to playing Red Dead Redemption. SO refreshing interacting with great acting in the game. 100% more enjoyable.
Starfield has so many awesome little details and possibilities, especially with the psychics and items. Other games' engines are not even able to pull that off. It may not be the most next gen looking game but it sure as hell is impressive.
Oh the physics in Starfield is great... and i could just remember throwing a grenade into a bunch of civilians and they just drop dead in the place... when in a game like Cyberpunk 2077, if you throw a grenade into a crawded area at least the civilians will be sent flying, is even better whe you throw at enemies, because then things get messy and gory, do Starfield has gore? Oh sorry, just ragdoll physics and poorly executed...
@@Cyberk_ yes that same game that just launched a dlc that is already crushing you bethesda trash. And by the way a fkg SPACE GAME this days that doesn't even have seamless transitions from space / planets IS trash, Hello Games can do it, and eve a turkish guy did this in his INDIE GAME that he is making SOLO called Spacebourne 2. So yeah, Starfield is trash either as an rpg and looter shoter becouse Cyberpunk is BETTER than Starfield in this regard or either as a space sim because even INDIE games can do BETTER than Bethesda.
@@efxnews4776 Oh ok, so you just copy and pasted the "seemless" criticism when they never mentioned it to be seemless, unlike CDPR filling their mouths of crap lmao. Ok, CP2077 wins in transitions, graphics, combat, story, decisions and... water physics?. However SF beats from day 1 in character/ship/weapon customization, building, jobs, resource management, replayability, world and NPC interactivity, working crime system (at release :D), contraband, enemy variety, home owning, companions' romance, random encounters, points of interest, backgrounds/traits, side activities, crafting and every other physics aspect than water. SF is practically Oblivion and F3 with improvements, and as rpg elements concern, Cyberpunk can't hope to win against those, but the best thing you all (ponies) got is "muh 3 secs loading screen 😭". And nice DLC btw, it just took 3 years, again. Just wait for Starfield to get there and launch DLCs like far harbor and shivering isles again.
probably the two most disappointing games ever made if you are a Space opera enjoyer, i dont know which is worse honestly, probably andromeda because it has the mass effect name on it, like how dare you to make something like that with mass effect on it, and im not even talking about the facial expressions, thats another story.
Ну старфилд выглядит лучше. Детализация намного лучше, на лице можно расмотреть каждый волосок. Почему-то космос в Старфилде показали на карте, а не с кабины пилота на орбите
@@vprok94 чел, пойми, андромеда это откровенно плохая игра, и любой фанат саги про шепарда тебе это подтвердит. то что ее сравнивают со старфилдом это уже показатель унылости старфилда, и сблев от биотварей судя по всему выигрывает с разгромным счетом
(Using the translator) Hahahahaha... being compared to Mass Effect Andromeda and losing in graphical quality, animations, combat mechanics and coherence in general, is sad! Let's give it another 25 years to see if Howard gets it right! And let's be clear... if you play Mass Andromeda, it's an average game and, if you've played the trilogy and then play Andromeda, it's real rubbish! Having great graphics and good gameplay didn't stop it from being an embarrassment! How I wanted to see the Trilogy using the graphics and gameplay we saw in Andromeda! Congratulations on the video, good health and success!
My impression while playing Andromeda is that it wasn't supposed to be the way it is, we knew the game was scrapped at some point due to problems with the randomly generated planets, but i believe there was also some changes in the script of the game... if you notice the pattern of the story in Andromeda, is almost like this game was supposed to be a prequel about the FIrst Contact war, and someone changed the script to add the other races into the game, alongside the plot of the Andromeda, but all the rest seems to be made of something else... In my opinion it would be a much better game if Bioware did a prequel game about the FCW, humans start to explore the galaxy and all of suddenly we meet with the turians in not friendly terms, and the a war just broke out. Some folks would be mad about, but it would be most likely a Halo: Reach situation, while the game is good, but the fans get mad about the fact that Master Chief wasn't the star of the game.
@@efxnews4776 (Using the translator) Congratulations on the comment friend! After my revolt with Starfield, I decided to revisit Mass Andromeda and, honestly... playing it as a space game, it's interesting, it has different planets, different races and even conflicts between humans themselves. Look man... Mass Andromeda could be so many things. As soon as you arrived on a planet and dominated an area, after installing the base, it could become a Red Alert 2 and you could fortify, protect and create an army to facilitate the conquest of the planet. He understands? Imagine how many hours of gameplay we would have just to dominate a planet. And of course... the game had to avoid getting boring while keeping the story interesting. I think everything bad about Mass Andromeda could have been EA's order and so Bio was forced to make such a soulless game! Are the guys so stupid, that they thought they could just add the asari, the krogan, the turians and the game would become Mass Effect? Now we hope the new Mass Effect is good! Thank you for the conversation, good luck!Congratulations on the comment friend! After my revolt with Starfield, I decided to revisit Mass Andromeda and, honestly... playing it as a space game, it's interesting, it has different planets, different races and even conflicts between humans themselves. Look man... Mass Andromeda could be so many things. As soon as you arrived on a planet and dominated an area, after installing the base, it could become a Red Alert 2 and you could fortify, protect and create an army to facilitate the conquest of the planet. He understands? Imagine how many hours of gameplay we would have just to dominate a planet. And of course... the game had to avoid getting boring while keeping the story interesting. I think everything bad about Mass Andromeda could have been EA's order and so Bio was forced to make such a soulless game! Are the guys so stupid, that they thought they could just add the asari, the krogan, the turians and the game would become Mass Effect? Now we hope the new Mass Effect is good! Thank you for the conversation, good luck!Congratulations on the comment friend! After my revolt with Starfield, I decided to revisit Mass Andromeda and, honestly... playing it as a space game, it's interesting, it has different planets, different races and even conflicts between humans themselves. Look man... Mass Andromeda could be so many things. As soon as you arrived on a planet and dominated an area, after installing the base, it could become a Red Alert 2 and you could fortify, protect and create an army to facilitate the conquest of the planet. He understands? Imagine how many hours of gameplay we would have just to dominate a planet. And of course... the game had to avoid getting boring while keeping the story interesting. I think everything bad about Mass Andromeda could have been EA's order and so Bio was forced to make such a soulless game! Are the guys so stupid, that they thought they could just add the asari, the krogan, the turians and the game would become Mass Effect? Now we hope the new Mass Effect is good! Thank you for the conversation, good luck!Congratulations on the comment friend! After my revolt with Starfield, I decided to revisit Mass Andromeda and, honestly... playing it as a space game, it's interesting, it has different planets, different races and even conflicts between humans themselves. Look man... Mass Andromeda could be so many things. As soon as you arrived on a planet and dominated an area, after installing the base, it could become a Red Alert 2 and you could fortify, protect and create an army to facilitate the conquest of the planet. He understands? Imagine how many hours of gameplay we would have just to dominate a planet. And of course... the game had to avoid getting boring while keeping the story interesting. I think everything bad about Mass Andromeda could have been EA's order and so Bio was forced to make such a soulless game! Are the guys so stupid, that they thought they could just add the asari, the krogan, the turians and the game would become Mass Effect? Now we hope the new Mass Effect is good! Thank you for the conversation, good luck!
Srsly... ? Comparing Starfield to Mass Effect Andromeda which failed in first place? Lol thats very low expectations here lmao Even tho MA: Andromeda failed I played it from the beginning to the end. I couldn't play Starfield for more than 10 mins on the other hand. Boring game...
In starfield you cant fly with your ship ... the game is only about fast travel its a joke ... in Andromeda the story is so intense you dont mind that you cant control a ship and you are ready for that aspect becouse no one told you in massefect that you have an amazing procedural generated universe to explore
Anyone who played No Man's Sky knows that Starfield sucks both in gameplay as with the story, and NMS doesn't even have a great story to begin with, but at least didn't COPY the ending of another game and guess wich game Starfield copied the ending? Yep, NMS... Andromeda AT least has the legendary ME lore to back it up, Starfield doesn't even have a SINGLE ALIEN RACE, to even say it has a decent lore! Also Andromeda has a far superior COMBAT and more engaging characters than your crappy Bethesda game. Not even going to go to the fact that Starfield is a wanna be NMS while trying to be a modern Mass Effect game in terms of story and failing horribly in both!
lol no. Starfield's story, in typical Bethesda fashion, is quite literally the opposite of what a BioWare RPG should be like. It's dull and boring. Maybe in terms of exploration, Starfield is what Andromeda was supposed to be, but in terms of story, I'll take Mass Effect Andromeda any day.
Andromeda is like Starfield should have been and wanted to be, sadly. Starfield is just a gigantic sandbox in the space, not an RPG game. It's not bad and it's funny to arrange ships and outposts, there are many things to do but the combat system is not even half good as Andromeda's
@maddyaurora Yes. I show a cutscene then I show the gameplay about how you can't take off your helmet on that planet. The cutscene helps to understand the situation. This is the only reason it's there.
@@ghostrider2698love the fact that some of them have never played the starfield or are pretending and have biased opinions cause “yOuTuBEr sAiD it bAd” so I think its bad
Funny how a game that uses an outdated engine (Starfield) completely succedes where a game that uses an engine it wasnt supposed to use (Andromeda)failed!
I just don't understand that kind of video... except for click bait for hater... Come on, if you don't like the game, don't play it... do something you enjoy instead... why do you want to be so sad... find something fun to do...
Cmon don't give starfield the hate speech just because some famous people are bad talking the game! Look at this game like the first time you played skyrim! The exploration and free will in this game is insaaane, and btw, people hate andromeda too just because yourtubers, played myself, and for me it's the strongest in the series! Several problems that plagued the older games are fixed and never before the game is so fun
-with a good history! And Starfield got its "bethesta open campaing" style, i just can't get bored with all the quest with deep lore and some even with emotional investing!
Play both games, then get your opnion, just don't hate on something you haven't played yet! Cheers!
The reason people hate it because of the worst optimization on pc and the graphics are not even up to the mark if a gtx 1660 super rtzx 2060, 3050, gtx 1080 cant run this game on high 60 fps their is something wrong with it
I played 10 hours, practically every door that the player enters into an environment, whether external or internal, has loading, it looks exactly like Skyrim in 2011, meaning there has been almost no technical evolution in the engine. This game is nothing like Skyrim, it's more like a Fallout 4 DLC in space, but with worse physics and worse AI. Andromeda is terrible too, but its better then Starloading: Fallout 4 DLC. Wasted money.
@@bilal6865 theres a lot of reasons, why people hate it, the poor optmization for PC is just one of the reasons... but theres plenty others, like the space flight mechanics of the game, that is dumb compared with other games of the genre, by the way, the comparison with Andromeda was pretty accurate, because Andromeda was trying to copy the randonly generated planets like NMS did, the diference is that Bioware realize that all they could do was exactly what Starfield did, just some big worthless tiles and dumb space combat like Starfield so they simply decided to scrap it and simplify.
Altought combat in Andromeda was the best of the entire franchise, the story suffered most with this, even tough the story in Andromeda was still great than it is in Starfield, and Andromeda story is the worst of the whole franchise (sometimes i get the impression that Andrormeda was supposed to be a prequel about the First Contact War, is mostly a feeling that somehow Bioware got the script for the FCW and decide to changed to make it 600 years in the future of ME trilogy in a completely different galaxy), and yet, it is still better than Starfield story, at least has a far more interesting lore on it.
Also combat in Starfield was even compared with combat in Fallout 4 and it didn't hold up, is even worst when it is compared with games like Cyberpunk 2077 combat, wich, may not be the most awesome combat of all ( i prefer much more the approch of Borderlands 3 on combat), you can't deny that CP77 is clearly the winner in this regard, wich makes the combat in Starfield outdated with a jetpack, and by the way, combat in Andromeda is superb, is basically the only great thing about the game, but yeah.
Exploration in Starfield sucks!
Seriously, anyone defending the exploration in this game is nuts... i been playing No Man's Sky recently and i tell you, theres CAVES bigger and more interesting than all tiles of Starfield combined, and this are just caves, in NMS you can LITERALLY explore all the whole damn planets your ship can touch on the ground, and did i also mentioned that you can explore planets on vehicles in NMS, you can even use a mech to explore caves if you wish!
How is exploration in Starfield? You have to land on a tile after some loadscreens and cutscenes, then run for minutes in the direction of a marker, yeah... Starfield feels great, isn't?
No, i hate starfied 😾
it's bad bro
Everyone hated on Andromeda, but I really liked it. 💖
I liked Ryder better than the strict, over-heroized Shepard, Ryder was more human. also liked the fem voice actress more
Ryder was wooden and cringe.
i keep shitting on it
The dialogue is so bad that it drug the experience as a whole down, but I still really enjoyed Andromeda.
The combat is really fun and while most of the crafting systems are broken, it was really fun researching new weapons
Not saying the voice actors were bad, just the writing of the dialogue
Andromeda actually a nice game when compare with starfield
lol
Nope its still shit, starfield way better in every way
@@Eptablenah
No matter what you think of Andromeda's story or characters, you can not deny that it's gameplay and graphics are excellent.
when it was first released it was horrible.
@@jebes909090 but these it's not.
I lose interest in playing with too many puzzlelocks
Andromeda was a slap in the face to any real ME fans. Starfield is FAR superior
@@OGbrundle Actually, real ME fans see Andromeda for what it is. Wasted potential. Good premise with good ideas, but badly written and poorly executed. And you can't deny that Andromeda has some of, if not the best, gameplay in the series.
I’m playing ME Andromeda on PS5 and it’s fantastic !! no bugs …nothing… and the missions and locations are pretty cool , after 1 hour of gameplay..it gets pretty immersive !
Bruh I get why pc players are angey but you ps5 guys don't even have the game
Games honestly fine, especially if you try and get immersed and enjoy the new take on combat.
I guess we can start appreciating Andromeda more now.
For a 6 years old game, Andromeda holds up really good. Poor souls, who thought that it was a bad game, they miss out.
well it was bad for a mass effect game imo
@@ismbeatz it's fine imo. I definitely wouldn't call it bad even for a mass effect it's just they didn't do enough world building. I guess it was maybe also a little safe for mass effect.
Todd is genious! He released starfield so we could play andromeda😂.
He released Starfield for modders ;)
ME andromeda was a way better game then starfield as space exploration RPG, and it was made 6 years ago. despite its flaw during launch with bugs etc, after they patch everything its very enjoyable. the combat system and graphic still beat most of the game made today.
ahahahahahahahah
It made me want to play Mass Effect Andromeda again, it was more immersive
yep me too
Do it. I’ve been playing it for a while. Tryna immerse myself as a “mercenary” kind of Ryder. Using the maverick set basically. Honestly feels great. Always love when sci fi games has mercenary looking sets as apposed to only soldier and space gear.
Lool i was thinking the same hahahhaah
I would myself the only thing that holds me back is the stupid fetch quests
Andromeda is a better game than Starfield.
No
R u dumb?
No. No it's not
Andrômeda is 100x better indeed
The gameplay is really good and it feels good to play despite the flaws, starfield has no good gameplay mechanics at all, game is stuck in 2009 with all the jank
Storywise andrômeda is not perfect, but has some good moments and quests
Starfield on the other hand has one of the most horrible and boring stories I have ever seen
And he'll andrômeda looks better as well with a better art design, starfield has empty maps with rocks and looks like dog crap, and it runs like shit
@@sadarumhogai9337 As a big Mass Effect fan, I will wholeheartedly disagree with every single thing you just said. Andromeda was awful. The worst, most one dimensional characters, terrible excuse for a plot or lack thereof, even after they "fixed" it the characters still look like Shrek, it was boring AF, and the combat just turned in to Gears Of War (which I personally despise). One of the best descriptions I've seen is that Mass Effect 1-3 was an epic space opera, and Andromeda is the Marvel spin off. Starfield to me feels like what Mass Effect SHOULD have evolved in to, in fact the similarities between the two are unignorable. Also, I still don't get how anybody is surprised or shocked at what Starfield is, they were pretty damn transparent before it released, people want it to be something it's not. My main complaint with Starfield is that it is very PG in comparison to all of Bethesda's other titles.
Who said that if you add a gray color to the game, it will become more realistic?😂
I think both games are great! In Starfield my favorite thing is space travel and first person view, in Mass Effect Andromeda my favorites are it's tps view and the scanning function! What are YOUR favorites? Let me know in the comments! :)
No Man's Sky also have first person view, EVEN to vehicles, so i much prefer NMS, over this two, but if i have to pick one it would be Andromeda, wich i already have it, and i even moded to have first person view (altough this also screw the beauty and hair mods i also downloaded for Sarah Ryder...
Overal Andromeda is a better game, it just doesn't reach the same hights than the OG ME trilogy,
Starfield completely sucks in my opinion, i came from the space sim genre and to me, Starfield looks pathetic.
Honestly after the sysdef vs crimson fleet mission i got bored.
just play x4 or elite dangerous or whatever space sim (even old poor tomorrow war) and meet the fact: space travel in starfield is decoration witout anything behind
I prefer Andromeda combat system and the fact it's a real RPG. Starfield isn't an RPG at all. You can use all weapons. The only difference is that you can play a moral character or a criminal one and that'it. An engineer in Mass Effect uses rifles and pistols and can damage robotic enemies. An engineer in Starfield is like a soldier or an assassin: you can use stealth as much as heavy weapons or rifles and pistols, no difference. Starfield is pretty but it's not a RPG game.
Oh, I forgot how much idiotic is the AI with your companions always coming in my line of fire and getting hurt or blocking my way while I'm looting.
I don't like that Andromeda main missions are interminable, really very very long but it's a BioWare habit
@@efxnews4776 NMS with ugly cartoon graphic and dumb mass asteroids if you fly out of the orbit.
Can't believe Andromeda is in the end more appealing than Starfield... What a let down from Bethesda.
2:14
Note andromeda also has a “shoulder swap” mechanic where you can go left handed and have your camera move left.
Cover is genuinely seamless and breaking from cover and rushing a weakened enemy or a confused squad had never been better. And if you need to disengage or rush you have a jet Dodge. Infact depending on your specialization it can be a biotic dodge. Creating more distance (usually on the either pure biotic ones where you need a lot to distance. Or the close range biotic ones where you need to rush and get out fast)
And the game the best aim assist I can think of. The snap on is very very minor and usually you’re out of range for the snap anyway. And it’s mainly just normal aim assist. Unfortunately you cannot turn of aim snap and keep aim assist. But you can turn off aim assist all together.
Along with that this game as lovely armor. My favorite is the maverick set. It has that badass mercenary look. It also specializes in picking off targets with headshots. Perfect for soldiers who enjoy ripping the head off of anyone too cocky to peak for too long.
Yes ME cover system was great. Yes Mass Effect design was so cool from the start, ME3 multiplayer coop was really funny, and it's still played today.
I remember everyone dissing Mass Effect Andromeda for its crappy facial animation on release. Why do I not see so many people dissing Bethesda for all the shit facial animations that game has?
The fact that we are comparing the two, tells how bad starfield is
Each time I watch Starfield I have to laugh how blazingly stupid the enemy AI is ... Andromeda looks better in many ways which is amazing when you realize it's 6 years old game ... Although the ship interiors look amazing, Starfield game engine appears outdated ...
Mass effect came out in 2017 tho and honestly it looks better than STARFIELD, I love STARFIELD, I’m just saying!
4:06 You can get on the ship take off and from space activate the ship's scanner and travel to a planet that is in the same system. What you did was fast travel. So comes the cinematic takeoff and landing.
ive just beat starfield after 90 hours, makes me wanna play andromeda again tho
What you want to play is Me2 with graphical overhaul 😂
not a bad idea@@Turanic1
Man, if by beating Starfield you mean doing the main mission, then you haven't played Starfield seriously and you don't even know what the game is worth. Sorry if I sound too aggressive, but even Skyrim's main mission was a little boring and what made the game spectacular were all the other missions and the exploratory nature that the game offered. The same thing happens with Starfield! That's why I'm as addicted to this game as I was (and still am) to Skyrim (over 4000 hours of gameplay!).
In fact, it seems to me that many of the big UA-camrs and other critics who reviewed this game only played the main mission and little else, and therefore left with a not very good impression of the game. Time will tell whether or not I'm right.
@@letsplayskyrimle9391 Crimson fleet totally worth it, Ryujin is Okaysh story, Vanguard is also Okay , but at 130h Starfield got me bored , will leave Free planets for 2nd pkaythrough or sth
@@Turanic1 Explore the planets! Use the scanner!
Scanning looks definitely cooler in Mass Effect.
I don't care, my love for mass effect and Andromeda makes me bias... But Yea, i do think Andromeda looks and plays fantastic.
People should try Andromeda now, its very good game, i just played it for the first time yesterday and it was definitely not what i was expecting, in a good way. The story is okay, the game is excellent.
I'll start by saying my 2 favourite series when it comes to gaming are Mass Effect and Fallout . I'm 10 hours into Starfield and the game is ok , but I had higher expectations . I've actually played Andromeda again recently and I still got hooked , I'm still struggling to connect with Starfield . Graphics seem a bit outdated , dialogue is bland , story kind of mediocre , space exploration...I'm not even gonna go into that . But it makes me miss games like ME2 or Fallout NV , Starfield doesnt even come close to those games .
Fallout NV is actually an Obsidian game... no surprise it is the best from the post Interplay age.
L
Right now, I'm 98,4 hours into the game and I can tell you that you still don't even have the slightest idea what the game is! It's a game that takes a long time to discover and understand how it works. Don't worry about doing the main mission, it's not a priority. Discover the game by completing other missions and exploring the planets. On the surface of the planets, turn on the scanner and start exploring. Planet Jemison alone has perhaps more things to explore than all of Skyrim. And I know what I'm talking about, because I have 4200 hours in Skyrim!
Seeing if I can surpass 100 hours on Starfield today!
Andromeda was good. Idk why everyone hates it.
Starfield is so fucking boring i cant force myself to play Andromeda is so much better not that good as Iconic Shepard but its still MASS EFFECT story is interesting gameplay very good (love biotic) but Starfield ... so uncomfortable to play and as i said boring :/ guys im really trying ..
Sony pny I beat Andromeda and I love starfield. Have you ever played a Bethesda game before . I'm talking before fallout 4.
If you want non boring Starfield just join Crimson fleet 😂
i dont know what are u talking about but i played morrowind oblivion skyrim and now trashfield have you even been on this world when morrowind came out ?:P and im always playing on pc @@ghostrider2698
Just WOW people cant be objective these times , i just said my own opinion about this game is trash there are many OLD GAMES better with graphic and story without glitch than this game if u like it then ok have fun but in my opinion you are blind , bethesda doing always bad work and modders fixing their games
Considering how old ME Andromeda is it shows how advanced the Frost engine rendering was. They need to fix the crappy Fallout 4 leftover interface too. Too funny a game that much older is still better lol.
Well, I'll play later Starfield, but I must say I love Andromeda. I'm discovering it atm, and of course play with multiple mods (especially to reduce scanning, improve graphics), it's a great game. I loved the ME Legendary Edition too. For me , they're in the same universe, but definitely different experiences. Also, playing a woman in Andromeda is better. For Starfield, I could compare when I'll play it end 2024, properly modded and patched as usual. One thing, from what I see as a space rpg, Starfield seems to be okay. Regarding pure space exploration, No Man Sky is the best experience, regarding space combat, no game comes close Elite Dangerous imho, but these 2 games suffer from lacks of plot, significant characters etc. In fact the perfect game would be a Mass Effect characters-wise and story-wise/No Man Sky's exploration/Elite Dangerous's simulation mix but such a game is litteraly impossible and would cost hundreds of millions of dollars ^^ I wanted Star Citizen to be such a game but it seems so lack great characters/plot atm, we'll see.
Andromeda winner
Funny guy lol
@@captainkirk9691what's funny? It's the truth.
@@skullkraken_resurrected9857 Sry my face is tired.
@@captainkirk9691yep it's true mr blind
@@captainkirk9691Starfields faces look worse, and they only had to work with humans, MEA had alien species.
Andromeda is an underrated masterpiece
There is currently some idiotic trend in new games where everything appears to be shrouded in some haze or mist. It is fucking horrible. Devs stop doing that. Crystal clear clarity like in Mass Effect is what is desired. Look at the rooms in Starfield. Every room seems to have some kind of cloud or mist...
but the detail is amazing
Andromeda's script was a failure although the setting and premise of the characters was good, the graphics are great to this day and the combat ... the rest is mediocre.
It has a better script than Starfield
it still has a better story than starfield lmao. people call it a failure because they keep comparing it to the epic story of commander Shepard's journey to thwart galactic annihilation. If you keep comparing it to the OG trilogy, of course it's not as good. But on its own, it's definitely got a better story and side-quests than many game out there.
One thing I really love about Andromeda is how freakin' majestic it makes space look.
I am currently playing ME on ultra, feels great just hate the overall HUD
andromeda is underrated, it gathered so much organized hate. starfield is a bugthesda game so nobody is surprised, people even excuse it for that ... unfair
I noticed that Starfield was just like Andromeda when I first watched the preview at the Xbox Showcase. I disregarded the bad publicity on Andromeda and, loving BioWare, I started playing it a couple of years ago and I enjoyed it a lot. I couldn't understand the bad reviews on a very good game. Now I see that I was right about Starfield (which I bought in premium edition and I am currently playing it) and that Andromeda aged very well (now it's 6 years old and last generation consoles).
It's a pity that Andromeda was considered a little failure. I think it was just an emotional reaction by the gamers expecting to play as Shepard forever
Both starfield and Andromeda are garbage games in isolation. Huge waste of money and time. Simple as. And it has nothing to do wanting to play as shepard.
Starfield look like a 2013 game…
Gta 5 no se ve como starfield y es del 2013
It literally is. It’s using the engine that was created in 2006.
Yet many 2023 games can't pull of the details and psychics with so many items as Starfield because the engines can't handle it. Bethesda made different choices to prioritize.
@@MuscledRMH Honestly Bethesda games’ janky physics is nothing to boast about 😂 not to mention they were already outdated a decade ago.
@@MuscledRMH The vegetation looks awful, though. Just looking at the trees, Far Cry 2 (2008) and Crysis (2007) did that already better. Especially the interaction of the leafs with light. Lighting in Starfield looks also quite flat tbh. Certainly some years behind a lot of other games. Look at Far Cry Primal or Dying Light which came out in 2016. Way better lighting models in those games. Another game from that year is Homefront The Revolution. For all the issues it had at launch (some similar to Starfield like frame rate and some wonky physics here and there), the visuals were pretty impressive. The dynamic lighting model and weather model were pretty impressive. Really atmospheric. Especially in night scenes they did a spectacular job. It really feels like it's dark and there's a nice contrast between lighted areas and dark areas. Not like in many games, where you just get a washed out colour scheme with a blue hue to it.
NPC models... well, there Starfield doesn't look that spectacular either. Neither in their texturing, animations, or facial expressions, if I'm honest.
The ai also looks quite brain-dead, but I guess that's just a symptom that a lot of open world games have these days. Even Ubisoft (with all their open world games) managed to downgrade ai in every Far Cry title. With Far Cry 2 having by far the best ai of all Far Cry games...
Some things in Starfield are nicely upgraded, though, like the materials model and how it interacts with things like lighting and fluids. And texture quality looks solid for the most part from what I can tell (character models excluded). It certainly looks more consistent and cohesive than Fallout 4 (truth be told, that was a pretty big issue with Fallout 4, so good that at least that has been fixed).
Andromeda is the one of the best game i have ever played, story, unique planet exploration, vault taiming, exploring, combats, graphics, story are excellent
It's time for Captain Shepard to come back!!
Again? Let him be dead
@@LaburnumAnagyroides Her
Commander shephard
Starfield is not a bad game but its not an AAA+ Game. Thats what Bethesda needs to know, and the Copy and Paste bases with the same items in the same place is so such a pain in the ass. Really, Bethesda did a real bad job with Starfield, I really hope they will improve with the DLC which we will sadly need to pay for having It and feel a real complete game!
I even dont start with the bugs which is normal today!
its triple F game
Its cost like AAA+ game, its need AAAAAAA+ PC...
the new fallout 4 dlc looks great
Didn’t really do well there now did it bud
not in the slightest. Im glad I didnt buy the game and was just being sarcastic@@Kurimazdaripper
With water physics you should have shown the waterfalls. Starfield waterfalls are dreadful. Also i get sooo many bugs. rn my companion has no head 😂
I kind of love Andromeda. Sure the story and characters aren’t as compelling as the Trilogy, but I never got tired of the gameplay and exploration.
Also, I’m glad they got rid of the Paragon/Renegade scales so you’re free to use the conversation wheel however you want.
You can say what you say. I like to play Starfield over hours. I like in Bethesda games the switch from first- to third-person. You can build you bases and ships with improved equipment. And the design looks grown-up, not a teenie cartoon session.
Just mention to space topic, ME Andromeda is actually one of the best games I have ever played.
If you remove your helmet in the moon you would be dead in a couple of seconds, and even if you don't die, you would be baddly hurt, you can kiss goodbye to sight because you would be blind as a bat for the rest of your life.
For once, Andromeda does takes space serious, even in those planets that HAVE atmosphere you WOULD have differences in pressure, temperature, radiation... sure it has "safe" areas (that honestly i think Bioware should have worked this properly, but yeah...
Mass Effect is also wayy more cinematic than Starfield...
Actually the FPS combat in Starfield SUCKS too, i had a mod to play Andromeda in FPS, and let me tell you the game play is magnificent in first person on Andromeda, even more with the cool power that you can have (biotic charge is the best one), but when you compare Starfield combat with Cyberpunk 2077 combat well... it sucks...
By the way, in the mod i had for ME:A, you can see the body of the character (you can see your body in FPS on Starfield).
Water physics i find a pointless comparison, BUT is good note here that in PREVIOUS Bethesda titles you DO have even UNDERWATER exploration, Starfield is literally a downgrade in this regard.
Yes you can land "everywhere" in Starfield... but frankly, it's all so repetitve, that it is pointless it would be MUCH better if Starfield had just a more hand crafted content, and in Andromeda even being the worst game of ME franchise at least every location you can land, is unique.
Nope the new Crysis is Cyberpunk 2077, Starfield is just poorly optmized.
Не думал, что можно всерьёз сравнивать игру 17 и 23 года, и игра 17го будет её уделывать😂😂😂😂
не ожидал что можно выпустить игру унылее чем андромеда (на самом деле ожидал)
Honestly, I prefer that Bethesda's games continues to have even a slightly dated graphics if this means they continue to use their engine, with even the useless objects with a physics, I like it so much, especially in comparison to those games with graphics as beautiful as a Callisto Protocol, or Cyberpunk, or even RDR2, but less or in the worst zero interaction with the environment. I think objects are an important and underrated part of the environments, because they have physics and you can interact with them, and their presence in game worlds is like it makes me feel like everything is more "tangible". However, Andromeda isn't that bad in the end either, I like both.
its kinda unfair to compare just released starfield to years and years of patches andromeda. andromeda was a REAL shit show when it was released.
on PC you can have some nice Mods for Andromeda, better looking chars, better controls, better AI. Its not that much Bethesda give you in terms of modding but it make Andromeda more fun & enjoyable. i like it
Starfield is literally, the worse game I've ever played.
Mass Effect: Andromeda is better game, specially due to the combat.
I don’t usually compliment nor comment and very rarely watch such vids cuz I think todays creators are just cringe kids but man, this was REALLY well done comparision. All I wanted to see was in it. Thanks man. M
@zzzolll Thank you so much! I'm glad you liked it, comments like this feels like a glass of fresh water for me! :)
Mass effect 4 come save us
Or Squadron 42
Man Starfield is so lame that it makes Andromeda feel good. What happened to the industry 🤮
4:56 i have ptsd from this
I will take the robot companion in starfield over any of the npc in andromeda 😂
I dont no why they hate andromeda ? Because its was not a shepherd 🤔
media can compare watever they want. If starfield was half the quality in terms of graphics, i would rate it the same way, and play it the same way. starfield offers a big sense of the unexpected, the gameplay where you can "be whoever you want to be", "do whatever you want to do", has no rival.
With almost zero consequences hahahha
i dont see any consequences. it delivers the same, even better experience as his father Skyrim, a goty Winner. @@tinotrivino
You know you're cooked when you can be compared to Andromeda and lose
Mass effect is better
how tf are comparing gameplay to cutscene at the beginning? lol
Starfield is boring, main story is lame. Too many load screens, cut scenes. Feels like a 20yr old game.
> I guess Starfield is the new Crysis?!
LMAO. This is the new Cyberpunk 2077 (NASApunk 2377🤷♂️)
I liked Starfield more
starfield?? NoNO~~ clickfield~~~😁😁😁
I want a Starfiels vs PhantasyStar from the 8 bit MasterSystem Video...two Space Adventure RPGs from theyr Time...One was revulutionary and Stunning for its Time😂
It's strange that mods is better than the original Bethesda games
I don't play either of these games, but it seems like you're desperately straw-manning for the sake of proving the game you prefer superior despite literally no one else comparing the two or caring lol
"I don't care about it so it means nobody else cares" lol, the salt in your comment is off the charts
The majority of comments on here are from PlayStation fanboys upset they can’t play the masterpiece that is Starfield😂😂 It’s ok fanboys, I’d probably be a little salty too! 😂😂
pc master race here: starfield is sh**
Mass effect Andromeda is billion light years better than Starshit in all possible ways!!!
I left Starfield level 22 - (boring AF game) - to playing Red Dead Redemption. SO refreshing interacting with great acting in the game. 100% more enjoyable.
Starfield has so many awesome little details and possibilities, especially with the psychics and items. Other games' engines are not even able to pull that off. It may not be the most next gen looking game but it sure as hell is impressive.
Oh the physics in Starfield is great... and i could just remember throwing a grenade into a bunch of civilians and they just drop dead in the place... when in a game like Cyberpunk 2077, if you throw a grenade into a crawded area at least the civilians will be sent flying, is even better whe you throw at enemies, because then things get messy and gory, do Starfield has gore? Oh sorry, just ragdoll physics and poorly executed...
@@efxnews4776 Do you mean that game with the worst launch on history that took 3 years to get fixed while still missing promised features?
@@Cyberk_dont worry he wont even talk about that lmao
@@Cyberk_ yes that same game that just launched a dlc that is already crushing you bethesda trash.
And by the way a fkg SPACE GAME this days that doesn't even have seamless transitions from space / planets IS trash, Hello Games can do it, and eve a turkish guy did this in his INDIE GAME that he is making SOLO called Spacebourne 2.
So yeah, Starfield is trash either as an rpg and looter shoter becouse Cyberpunk is BETTER than Starfield in this regard or either as a space sim because even INDIE games can do BETTER than Bethesda.
@@efxnews4776 Oh ok, so you just copy and pasted the "seemless" criticism when they never mentioned it to be seemless, unlike CDPR filling their mouths of crap lmao.
Ok, CP2077 wins in transitions, graphics, combat, story, decisions and... water physics?. However SF beats from day 1 in character/ship/weapon customization, building, jobs, resource management, replayability, world and NPC interactivity, working crime system (at release :D), contraband, enemy variety, home owning, companions' romance, random encounters, points of interest, backgrounds/traits, side activities, crafting and every other physics aspect than water.
SF is practically Oblivion and F3 with improvements, and as rpg elements concern, Cyberpunk can't hope to win against those, but the best thing you all (ponies) got is "muh 3 secs loading screen 😭".
And nice DLC btw, it just took 3 years, again. Just wait for Starfield to get there and launch DLCs like far harbor and shivering isles again.
MILKY WAY GALAXY 🌌🌌🌌🌌🌌
Andromeda looks like a child's game, like Fortnite in space. Starfield offers so much more
this a good prospective for comparison
probably the two most disappointing games ever made if you are a Space opera enjoyer, i dont know which is worse honestly, probably andromeda because it has the mass effect name on it, like how dare you to make something like that with mass effect on it, and im not even talking about the facial expressions, thats another story.
Ну старфилд выглядит лучше. Детализация намного лучше, на лице можно расмотреть каждый волосок. Почему-то космос в Старфилде показали на карте, а не с кабины пилота на орбите
а на планете не показали БЕГОТНЮ в то время как в андромеде есть тачка
@@karlvareze8337 причем тут транспорт, если речь идёт о графике
@@vprok94 ну космос в старфилде с кабины оч так себе
@@karlvareze8337 просто в видео сравнивают карту в старфилде с видом из кабины в Андромеде, как-то это не честно
@@vprok94 чел, пойми, андромеда это откровенно плохая игра, и любой фанат саги про шепарда тебе это подтвердит. то что ее сравнивают со старфилдом это уже показатель унылости старфилда, и сблев от биотварей судя по всему выигрывает с разгромным счетом
(Using the translator)
Hahahahaha... being compared to Mass Effect Andromeda and losing in graphical quality, animations, combat mechanics and coherence in general, is sad! Let's give it another 25 years to see if Howard gets it right!
And let's be clear... if you play Mass Andromeda, it's an average game and, if you've played the trilogy and then play Andromeda, it's real rubbish! Having great graphics and good gameplay didn't stop it from being an embarrassment! How I wanted to see the Trilogy using the graphics and gameplay we saw in Andromeda!
Congratulations on the video, good health and success!
My impression while playing Andromeda is that it wasn't supposed to be the way it is, we knew the game was scrapped at some point due to problems with the randomly generated planets, but i believe there was also some changes in the script of the game... if you notice the pattern of the story in Andromeda, is almost like this game was supposed to be a prequel about the FIrst Contact war, and someone changed the script to add the other races into the game, alongside the plot of the Andromeda, but all the rest seems to be made of something else...
In my opinion it would be a much better game if Bioware did a prequel game about the FCW, humans start to explore the galaxy and all of suddenly we meet with the turians in not friendly terms, and the a war just broke out.
Some folks would be mad about, but it would be most likely a Halo: Reach situation, while the game is good, but the fans get mad about the fact that Master Chief wasn't the star of the game.
@@efxnews4776 (Using the translator)
Congratulations on the comment friend! After my revolt with Starfield, I decided to revisit Mass Andromeda and, honestly... playing it as a space game, it's interesting, it has different planets, different races and even conflicts between humans themselves. Look man... Mass Andromeda could be so many things. As soon as you arrived on a planet and dominated an area, after installing the base, it could become a Red Alert 2 and you could fortify, protect and create an army to facilitate the conquest of the planet. He understands? Imagine how many hours of gameplay we would have just to dominate a planet. And of course... the game had to avoid getting boring while keeping the story interesting. I think everything bad about Mass Andromeda could have been EA's order and so Bio was forced to make such a soulless game! Are the guys so stupid, that they thought they could just add the asari, the krogan, the turians and the game would become Mass Effect?
Now we hope the new Mass Effect is good!
Thank you for the conversation, good luck!Congratulations on the comment friend! After my revolt with Starfield, I decided to revisit Mass Andromeda and, honestly... playing it as a space game, it's interesting, it has different planets, different races and even conflicts between humans themselves. Look man... Mass Andromeda could be so many things. As soon as you arrived on a planet and dominated an area, after installing the base, it could become a Red Alert 2 and you could fortify, protect and create an army to facilitate the conquest of the planet. He understands? Imagine how many hours of gameplay we would have just to dominate a planet. And of course... the game had to avoid getting boring while keeping the story interesting. I think everything bad about Mass Andromeda could have been EA's order and so Bio was forced to make such a soulless game! Are the guys so stupid, that they thought they could just add the asari, the krogan, the turians and the game would become Mass Effect?
Now we hope the new Mass Effect is good!
Thank you for the conversation, good luck!Congratulations on the comment friend! After my revolt with Starfield, I decided to revisit Mass Andromeda and, honestly... playing it as a space game, it's interesting, it has different planets, different races and even conflicts between humans themselves. Look man... Mass Andromeda could be so many things. As soon as you arrived on a planet and dominated an area, after installing the base, it could become a Red Alert 2 and you could fortify, protect and create an army to facilitate the conquest of the planet. He understands? Imagine how many hours of gameplay we would have just to dominate a planet. And of course... the game had to avoid getting boring while keeping the story interesting. I think everything bad about Mass Andromeda could have been EA's order and so Bio was forced to make such a soulless game! Are the guys so stupid, that they thought they could just add the asari, the krogan, the turians and the game would become Mass Effect?
Now we hope the new Mass Effect is good!
Thank you for the conversation, good luck!Congratulations on the comment friend! After my revolt with Starfield, I decided to revisit Mass Andromeda and, honestly... playing it as a space game, it's interesting, it has different planets, different races and even conflicts between humans themselves. Look man... Mass Andromeda could be so many things. As soon as you arrived on a planet and dominated an area, after installing the base, it could become a Red Alert 2 and you could fortify, protect and create an army to facilitate the conquest of the planet. He understands? Imagine how many hours of gameplay we would have just to dominate a planet. And of course... the game had to avoid getting boring while keeping the story interesting. I think everything bad about Mass Andromeda could have been EA's order and so Bio was forced to make such a soulless game! Are the guys so stupid, that they thought they could just add the asari, the krogan, the turians and the game would become Mass Effect?
Now we hope the new Mass Effect is good!
Thank you for the conversation, good luck!
So Starfield is better. What was the point of this?
Srsly... ? Comparing Starfield to Mass Effect Andromeda which failed in first place? Lol thats very low expectations here lmao
Even tho MA: Andromeda failed I played it from the beginning to the end. I couldn't play Starfield for more than 10 mins on the other hand. Boring game...
We wre a bit to hard on Andromeda,so Starfield was just a bad game now
Think of a horrible game in every way. Pleasure, I present to you Mass Effect Andromeda. The worst thing ever produced by BioWare.
so mass effect mc is starborn 🤔
In starfield you cant fly with your ship ... the game is only about fast travel its a joke ... in Andromeda the story is so intense you dont mind that you cant control a ship and you are ready for that aspect becouse no one told you in massefect that you have an amazing procedural generated universe to explore
You did not play the game.
Starfield is such a dull and boring game.
Andromeda was hated by players but still better than Starfield and now dumb fanboys praise this abomination
Anyone who has actually played Starfield ans Andromeda knows that Starfield is what Andromeda should have been.
Anyone who played No Man's Sky knows that Starfield sucks both in gameplay as with the story, and NMS doesn't even have a great story to begin with, but at least didn't COPY the ending of another game and guess wich game Starfield copied the ending? Yep, NMS...
Andromeda AT least has the legendary ME lore to back it up, Starfield doesn't even have a SINGLE ALIEN RACE, to even say it has a decent lore!
Also Andromeda has a far superior COMBAT and more engaging characters than your crappy Bethesda game.
Not even going to go to the fact that Starfield is a wanna be NMS while trying to be a modern Mass Effect game in terms of story and failing horribly in both!
lol no. Starfield's story, in typical Bethesda fashion, is quite literally the opposite of what a BioWare RPG should be like. It's dull and boring. Maybe in terms of exploration, Starfield is what Andromeda was supposed to be, but in terms of story, I'll take Mass Effect Andromeda any day.
Andromeda is like Starfield should have been and wanted to be, sadly. Starfield is just a gigantic sandbox in the space, not an RPG game. It's not bad and it's funny to arrange ships and outposts, there are many things to do but the combat system is not even half good as Andromeda's
you are comparing a cutscene with a gameplay, you must be very smart and know how games work and how are made
@maddyaurora Yes. I show a cutscene then I show the gameplay about how you can't take off your helmet on that planet. The cutscene helps to understand the situation. This is the only reason it's there.
Starfield .... LOOOOL
Only people with potato PCs will think mass effect andromeda is better than starfield, the hate is real lmao
I know right lmao they showed a cutscene for oxygen part
man shut up!i have nasa pc ! mods in and still a bad game!just acept the game is not good enough
@@ghostrider2698love the fact that some of them have never played the starfield or are pretending and have biased opinions cause “yOuTuBEr sAiD it bAd” so I think its bad
@@reasonjefferey4644fr 😂
From what I hear they’re both god awful
Funny how a game that uses an outdated engine (Starfield) completely succedes where a game that uses an engine it wasnt supposed to use (Andromeda)failed!
Ну что по факту
I just don't understand that kind of video... except for click bait for hater... Come on, if you don't like the game, don't play it... do something you enjoy instead... why do you want to be so sad... find something fun to do...
O xbox vai revolucionar a indústria! Que piada lol
Ps5 after all is not so good
Isnt Star Field a Mass Effect wannabe?
Mass efect win ,Starfire zzzzzzz bugsss😊