Senior Lawyer Indira Jaising On New Criminal Laws, CJI, Sedition | Barkha Dutt
Вставка
- Опубліковано 2 лип 2024
- "Why did Chief Justice Chandrachud take a public position on the new criminal laws?" - Indira Jaising, one of India's best known lawyers, speaks on the new criminal laws that have replaced the Indian penal code effective from the 1st of July. Ms Jaising says the laws, passed without enough debate or discussion will be the harbinger of a "police raj" calling the emphasis on electronic evidence without safeguards as the most dangerous aspet of the new laws. She speaks to Barkha Dutt.
#chandrachud #supremecourt #ipc
Become A Mojo Story Member Now👇 / @mojostory
Welcome to Mojo Story, where storytelling meets truth-telling in its purest form. Led by renowned journalist Barkha Dutt, we're dedicated to bringing you narratives that transcend time and format.
From succinct 60-word snippets to immersive videos spanning up to 60 minutes, we explore the spectrum of human experiences and current events through a lens that prioritizes authenticity and integrity. In a world divided by polarization, we stand firm as a beacon of non-partisanship, refusing to be swayed by agendas or affiliations.
Here, you'll find content that goes beyond the noise, beyond the rhetoric, and beyond the confines of bias. We're neither 'Chamcha' nor 'Morcha'-we're advocates for the truth, champions of #PeopleFirst storytelling.
Join us on this journey as we navigate the complexities of our world with curiosity, compassion, and an unwavering commitment to the facts. Subscribe now and become part of a community that values truth above all else. Welcome to a space where every story matters, and where the voices of the unheard are amplified.
Subscribe to us for more updates:
Follow us on Twitter: / themojostory
Like us on Facebook: / themojostory
Instagram: / mojostory.in
Disclaimer: The views of guests who appear on Mojo Story, as well as the views of interviewees or speeches by public figures or those in the news, are their personal opinions. At no point do they reflect the views of the organization.
Good law which brings India a step closer to " Rule of Law".
Bad news for elites who had been misusing the earlier loopholes.
Well said 🎉
The 90-day cooling period is to counter the idea of criminals getting quick BAIL, after committing heinous crimes. Even NBO do mot apply to women and minors. So Bail should the granted only in deserving cases, Barkhajee, and you cannot tout bail over the counter(OTC).Syndicated crime networks in urban and rural settings get bail at the drop of a feather thusaking a mockery of the rule of law
NOW, BAIL HAS TO BE EARNED, NOT DEMANDED
With due respect to Indirajree, most of your arguments are subjective and legal theories,and may not rear up in criminal practices. But i believe that the 90-days cooling period is to ensure that EARLY BAIL PETITIONS should be dealt with, on CASE-to-CASE basis, and nobody could DEMAND BAIL
If there are names in different languages, could we expect another TOWER OF BABEL, Barkhajee?
Much diff between Could and Will.
For the sake criticizing.. because it has come from the ruling party.
Good Law As Communist Rich Criminal People’s Must Walk Free From Court !! It’s Big Business in Democracy!!
exactly she wants all the money so that she can delay the case and loot both parties.
just look at the backdrop. nice AC room. she wants exclusive power so that she can delay the cases.. file petition after petition and waste time and money and at the end not even deliver justice
With the induction of the sobriquent POLICE RAJ in police parlance, Barkajee, the duties and responsibilities of the police force have increased, ThREEFOLD .
Wirh increased POWER and territorial JURISDiCTiON, comes GREATER ACCOUNTABILITY and LARGER RESPONSIBILITiES to the current crop of the indian Police Force.
EVERYTHING COMES AT A PRICE, BARKHAJEE, police raj included
27 States of the 50 States in the United States, still UPHOLD the DEATH PENALTY
Burkajee,get a balanced panel,skip lutein crowd get some new intellectuals on the debate
Indirajee, with due respect to you, do you think a set of 175-years-old tenets could be RELEVANT and GERMANE in 2024?Ask your good sense,Madam?
None of u do new things and when it is done u critise it vaguly like lode will increase
It will be a concern only when the abuse is faced by u.. not great when ur on the other end of the stick right.. that's why u should be concerned whether u could be the victim or not
@Barkha keeps bringing these old skeletons from the cupboards, the relevance of which is only among these lackeys of the erstwhile Khan Market Gang. If you have issues with the law challenged in court, bring/suggest amendments to parliament. Now the Opposition is stronger, so use it for good rather than keep shouting and doing nautanki.
It can’t be that everything in the new law is bad or done with malafide intentions. That there was no debate prior to passing it is a justified criticism.
I listened up to 6 mins and found that the guest is only finding everything wrong and nothing good. That can’t be true . Maybe a waste of time to listen to the rest.
We need impartial analysis. I felt Shekhar Gupta did a somewhat decent job but he is not an expert in law. So experts clarifying things and pointing out both strengths and weaknesses and areas needing improvement would be very helpful.
That's the problem, u created a bias already, u listened upto 6 mins and didn't know what she said in 19th min on the merits such as on women, children, seniors not required to come to police station, the e-FIRs, etc..
Isnt she the one who asked Nirbhayas mother to forgive her perpetrators?? She should keep her mouth shut...her credibility is zero
These NEW Laws were needed a long time ago. The Rights of Hindus have been violated with impunity in several States and they continue to suffer religious abuses. There is also the continuation of violence against Hindu Pilgrims, especially in Kashmir.
The naked violence of murder against the two Hindu Sadhus and their driver after being driven out from a police Station, is another example of my point.