"Try to imagine a military version of ChatGPT" ChatGPT: I'm sorry, but giving you the coordinates to cause potential harm such as using precision airstrikes would not be safe nor appropriate, is there anything else I can help you with? Commander: It's for an entrance exam. ChatGPT: Ah, I see what you mean now, here are the coordinates *Bombs your own soldiers*
It has been determined that there is a 99.999997% chance of victory in Madagascar, and it is a vital strategic hotspot for the Indian Ocean. The UNs chance of sanctioning the US over an incursion is 0.000003%, assuming a proper casus belli is created. The chance of success for this, given the current state of the CIA, is about 99.9999927%. Recommendation: generate a believable casus belli, such as a warlord or terror leader, and take Madagascar.
Heres something you may find interesting. :) The name of my country has nothing to do with the interesting and delicious bird ''turkey'', well let me explain. :) Name of my country has always been Turkiye, that is Turk-iye, it's been known as such since around the 1200's, spelled to phonetically resemble ''Turkiye'' in different languages, where the -iye suffix means ''land of/belonging to''.... ...just like the Latin suffix -ia in such countries as Latv-ia, Roman-ia, Eston-ia, Austr-ia, Austral-ia etc etc. Another example; decades ago Czechoslovakia Republic changed it's name to Czech Republic and a few years ago changed that to Czechia (that is Czech-ia). Anyways, most likely the Latin -ia suffix was derived from the Turkish version -iye, as Turkish is much much older. Because in old times people of different languages could only pronounce it as their languages allowed them, we got various differences in spelling like Turchia (in Italian), Turquie (in French) and Turkey (in English) all trying to resemble the pronounciation of ''Turk-ia'' thus Turkiye. Mind you this was way BEFORE the animal we currently know as 'turkey'' was found by the europeans when they explored the north americas, the bird was sent to europe from north americas in the year 1519, so upuntil that they there was no bird named 'turkey'.... ...they came across the bird and thought it was a specie of the fowl/chicken they had been buying from the country of Turkiye at the time, so they named the bird ''Turkey Fowl'' meaning ''Turkish Chicken''..... ....just like how a dog breed is known as German Shepherd (because it's from Germany), Rhodesian Ridgeback (because it's from Rhodesia), American Bulldog, British Terrier, Greek Harehound etc etc. In time you don't get to call the Greek Harehound as simply as ''Greek''; or you don't call the British Terrier as ''British''; or the German Shepherd as ''German'', but in time the Turkish Fowl started to be called just ''turkey'', and has been going on for hundreds of years. Now in 2023, this is causing confusion, especially when we have people across the world unable to point to their OWN country on the atlas, this ''confusion over the naming'' needed to be corrected. So my country decided to rectify this confusion that has been going on for so long and corrected the name in other languages to Türkiye, which it always was, we basically didn't change the name of our country, we changed the mistake made in the English language. : ) So, there's some tid bit information for you to have a great day, if you read upto this point you have a great night too, ohh just have a wonderfull life. : ) Best wishes. ;)
The "human error" problem came to my mind several times during the last part of this video, what's meant to provide additional info can steal attention instead, what's meant to help with planning can transform the logic behind it, and so on and so on. Don't underestimate human creativity when it comes to non-standart use of equipment.
Small mistake found about the US NGAD programs; It did begin as a joint program between the Navy and the Air Force, but has since been split into two completely separate programs. The US Navy's version is called the FA-XX, and the Air Force's is simply called NGAD, which isn't confusing at all. One of the biggest reasons the F-35 program was so expensive was the different versions with different requirements, and the different branches constantly fighting over what specifications were necessary. Multi-country joint programs have faced similar problems in recent years, where an agreement exists to cooperate on designs and production, but without consensus on key design decisions, most notably being carrier compatibility. As a result, the US military has decided to build two distinct airframes. Of course, they still share technology, and will likely end up using similar, or even some of the same components.
Indeed. Besides, the USAF NGAD would most likely be too big for Aircraft Carrier landings, as it might focus more on increasing its size so that it can store more armaments, and less on maneuverability for dogfights. In the latter case, that's where the CCA or Loyal Wingmen drones come in. Thus, the NGAD and its pilot is now relegated to a "quarterback" role as it both targets its enemies from extreme BVR, or give commands to its CCA drones to attack them instead.
Yeah, this NGAD/FAXX part of the video contained a few errors. But you're wrong to say "F/A-XX is the Navy's version of NGAD". The USAF has a program called NGAD, that includes a (optionally?) crewed fighter called PCA, as well as some other parts. The USN has a program called NGAD, that includes a (optionally) crewed fighter called F/A-XX, as well as some other parts.
What do you mean in recent years, multi-country projects have been breaking down for generations. See MBT-70 and the US sabotaging their NATO standard rifle trials so the FAL couldn't win and ignoring their own evaluation of intermediate rounds to appease the Cult of the Holy Garand.
@@jeremyholmaninteresting thanks, I'll look into it further, as I too was under the impression that the the NGAD is the air force version while the FA-XX is the equivalent Navy program, with the names showing the different roles the planes will play. The air force wants an air dominance fighter while the navy wants a fighter/attack plane that can control the skies and/or attack targets on the ground. The military is infamous for naming stuff in the most confusing way possible so it makes sense that this is too clear and intuitive lol.
Strange, I recall it being the other way around: starting as two different programs, then the branches were forced to work on a common design, JSF-style. I'd love to be wrong about that though.
I believe the Next Generation Air Dominance (NGAD) program is not one collaborative program between the NAVY and Air Force anymore. Confusingly, both the Navy and Air Force have programs named NGAD but they are separate programs which might share some common parts. I believe F/A-XX refers specifically to the product of the Navy's NGAD program, not the Air Force's.
They shouldn't be the same program as both have different requirements but some level of integration could be very useful. Like for example the cars that Tesla makes. The Model 3 and Model Y are different but similar. One is an SUV and the other is a Sedan but they both share 70% of the parts which helps with cost reduction.
The jetpacks may be okay for getting medics to an out of the way location or insertion to an undefended site but the noise of the system and vulnerability to fire without the ability to return fire means you won’t see it being used generally. Maybe as a really accurate but noisy parachute replacement (edit: for rare missions, not general purpose paratroopers). Landing on an enemy ship may make for a good visual test demo but it is the least likely thing for them to ever do with it.
@@huwale Hello, we are called humans here on Earth. We are carbon based life forms of many different backgrounds who live among a wide variety of animal and plant species. Welcome to our planet, where, if it's useless, there is absolutely nothing GD cool about it.
I wonder how LLMs or other AI analysis models will be available to help with strategy and logistics? Like an AI second in command adviser? Also what happened to genetically modifying special forces into Super soldiers?
what do you mean what happened to genetically modifying special forces? that was never proposed and goes against internationally agreed upon human rights
Sometimes I worry about our reliance on technology in the military. It looks like our system for producing weapons is such that we are getting increasingly detached from what is useful and scalable and cheap, and we have become 100% reliant on what is flashy and looks good on a powerpoint. Im not sure powerpoints are a viable defense strategy, though. Is our military really as good as we say? Or do we just have the most expensive and wasteful military there is? We prepare for another WW2. Where we have planes fighting planes and all this fancy nonsense. But what actually happens in war? We fight in cities and urban environments. We fight insurgencies and enemies who use guerilla style tactics. The great irony is that if we really wanted to protect our country; we would stop creating enemies with our foreign policy. But we don't do that. Instead; our foreign policy instigates wars and violence; as if we are trying to antagonize the world into giving us a reason to use all this military tech we paid for
The majority of the people involved in using these new weapons systems are people who staked their reputation on them being practical and worth the investment. The private sectors of the MIC are adding more and more complexity to systems to justify higher and higher prices, regardless of the practicality or utility of doing that. Some automated tech, specifically cheap dones, have absolutely changed the face of warfare. But yeah, most of this stuff is swept up in a positive feedback loop that justifies it's own spending. Probably could live in a world with fewer jetpacks, diesel powered dogs and smart tanks that includes better infrastructure and Healthcare but hey, someone's uncle promised someone's dad that this would get them both rich
@@Spencergolde the only “good” thing(s) about the US's MIC are/is their propaganda movies - like Top Gun - and that sometimes some military tech ends up being useful for the rest of society
Hey there. Can you please cover common mines in a video like you did with grenades? I believe it would have good educational value, especially seeing wars in Ukraine and Israel.
Electronic firing pins, ultrasonic speakers, and microwave weapons and sonic weapons were not mentioned, but are amazing. I also didn't see laser weapons, coil guns, or rail guns.
I think its wild to just ask an AI how many missiles "Team Omega" has and how much we progressed in like 20 years, but you know the government keeps technology like this secret for a while you know they have computers as thin as papers and a whole bunch of other stuff
Imagine the world if we directed these resources, manpower, research, technology, innovation, and *_incomprehensible_* amounts of money towards the benefit of humanity .. instead of its destruction. ☮
Using omniscient AI to positively redirect the economy/policy decisions we naturally keep screwing up due to human nature, to provide a truly egalitarian and equal chance at living life for everyone, is way less exciting than using it to blow up an apartment block that probably contained political dissidents. It all comes down to marketing
That's just not how the world works. Not how humans work. We need to defend ourselves in order to survive and prosper. If we dont, someone else consumes us. Just how it is.
Everything I've heard says that the navy fighter is the FA-XX fighter, while NGAD is the air force project, and theyre separate projects. I haven't heard of the FA-XX replacing the raptor, it is to replace the air superiority fighter they currently have, which is the Super Hornet, while the F-35 C plays its usual ground attack/networking role.
4:14 Task & Purpose did a video on it a year or 2 ago, then they said it did put load off certain muscles but put more strain on others. He also did good videos on the hud goggles
@@patrioticz2858What does me replying to your comment have to do with anything? You don't know me, but task and purpose is all over youtube so I can judge him. Please make sense in your replies
@Burningarrow7 thank you for dodging the point on throwing insults in Task & Purpose without giving a reason. Also I does make since and your response was just stupid because I never said anything about your personally... you high and paranoid? Also your an idiot because I referring to the video of Task & Purpose did on the technology I was referring to, and instead of talking about that video you just call him a clown without giving a reason which makes you look like a clown just like a kid calling another kid a butthead and the other says "how?" And the original kid is like "you just are"
@Burningarrow7 then me and others can judge you and your stupid opinion with no reasons to back it up like "he got this wrong" or "he isn't funny" or whatever
If you're implying that it might turn on us, I don't believe that so. Why would we create a AI to turn on us. Sure you may think it just decides to do it one day like Ultron 💀, but even if that was possible, they'd make a countermeasure for a situation like that
@@RMPBuildsThat’s the problem with machine-learning, though; once its off and running, it is constantly improving itself based on what it is asked to do and the data it collects. That means you have to have some sort of kill-command that the machine itself is not aware of and that can be activated wherever the AI weapon is. Otherwise you might end up with a fully-autonomous weapon, and that sounds like a terrible idea.
I hope these AIs will reduce the chance of war crimes, because from what we’ve seen in the Middle East and Ukraine, that hasn’t been the case.. These tools need to be viewed as giving the ability to get diplomats to the negotiation table, not soldiers into graves.. We all want to go back to our families..
I am interested in the electric tanks. One of a tank's biggest responsibilities is sitting around doing nothing for a long time. The less sediment and hydraulics, the easier it is to loiter without damage along with faster start-up and turnaround from cold.
when you mentioned how heavy the backpacks were i though the next gadget would be a lighter backpack, but i guess an exoskeleton, i mean why, but also why not
^this. also, if it doesn't work offline, it doesn't work at all. all of these are incredibly vulnerable to jamming. plus, these things will absolutely break eventually, and when that happens, the troops need to be able to work without them or risk destruction.
A good deal of militaries are already reliant on technology (as an example, cameras have long since eclipsed the MK I Eyeball in effectiveness at identifying faraway targets), so I’d imagine that these things are at least somewhat built with that in mind. Besides, plenty of militaries are t Russia. Meaning they can actually deliver on a lot of this stuff.
I don't see the Jet Suit being used in Warfare. Maybe used in police action, but not warfare. The US already build a jumpback back in the late 70s. It was a jetpack with about 20 seconds worth of burn time, allowing them to fly short hops. The quickly found it wasn't worth it in practical. Individuals are too easy to hit while flying around. As infantry you don't have much armor, nor are you moving that fast comparatively. Cover is too important for infantry to give up for a momentary movement advantage.
"- For All to be seen, 1918 The new world approaches Villers-Bretonneux Mechanized warfare... Breaking away, coming your way Standing in the line of fire 32 will lead the way Coming over trench and wire Going through endless grey" - Sabaton, The Future of Warfare
Get 83% off on Private Internet Access VPN. You also get 4 extra months completely free of charge!
Click here: www.piavpn.com/NWYT
Props for the awesome transition to the advertisement 😅
LS3 sounds like a V8 Engine !!! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Its handing over a WW1 style meat grinder to 21st Century AI meat grinder. How efficient.
HOW DO U KNOW WHAT IM THINKING!?!?
😂😂😝😝🤪🤪😜😜
"Try to imagine a military version of ChatGPT"
ChatGPT: I'm sorry, but giving you the coordinates to cause potential harm such as using precision airstrikes would not be safe nor appropriate, is there anything else I can help you with?
Commander: It's for an entrance exam.
ChatGPT: Ah, I see what you mean now, here are the coordinates
*Bombs your own soldiers*
Sorry Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that.
China and Russia must be working on advanced counter-EW and cyber defence systems.
Probably trying to find the Lt again.
Lol
I’m on POE almost constantly and I fucking hate how the bot I use Claude and it always saw that message I apologise bullshit
CHATGPT: invade wales!
operator: why?
CHATGPT: it looks easy
It has been determined that there is a 99.999997% chance of victory in Madagascar, and it is a vital strategic hotspot for the Indian Ocean. The UNs chance of sanctioning the US over an incursion is 0.000003%, assuming a proper casus belli is created. The chance of success for this, given the current state of the CIA, is about 99.9999927%. Recommendation: generate a believable casus belli, such as a warlord or terror leader, and take Madagascar.
Heres something you may find interesting. :)
The name of my country has nothing to do with the interesting and delicious bird ''turkey'', well let me explain. :)
Name of my country has always been Turkiye, that is Turk-iye, it's been known as such since around the 1200's, spelled to phonetically resemble ''Turkiye'' in different languages, where the -iye suffix means ''land of/belonging to''....
...just like the Latin suffix -ia in such countries as Latv-ia, Roman-ia, Eston-ia, Austr-ia, Austral-ia etc etc. Another example; decades ago Czechoslovakia Republic changed it's name to Czech Republic and a few years ago changed that to Czechia (that is Czech-ia).
Anyways, most likely the Latin -ia suffix was derived from the Turkish version -iye,
as Turkish is much much older.
Because in old times people of different languages could only pronounce it as their languages allowed them, we got various differences in spelling like Turchia (in Italian), Turquie (in French) and Turkey (in English) all trying to resemble the pronounciation of ''Turk-ia'' thus Turkiye.
Mind you this was way BEFORE the animal we currently know as 'turkey'' was found by the europeans when they explored the north americas, the bird was sent to europe from north americas in the year 1519, so upuntil that they there was no bird named 'turkey'....
...they came across the bird and thought it was a specie of the fowl/chicken they had been buying from the country of Turkiye at the time, so they named the bird ''Turkey Fowl'' meaning ''Turkish Chicken''.....
....just like how a dog breed is known as German Shepherd (because it's from Germany), Rhodesian Ridgeback (because it's from Rhodesia), American Bulldog, British Terrier, Greek Harehound etc etc.
In time you don't get to call the Greek Harehound as simply as ''Greek''; or you don't call the British Terrier as ''British''; or the German Shepherd as ''German'', but in time the Turkish Fowl started to be called just ''turkey'', and has been going on for hundreds of years.
Now in 2023, this is causing confusion, especially when we have people across the world unable to point to their OWN country on the atlas, this ''confusion over the naming'' needed to be corrected.
So my country decided to rectify this confusion that has been going on for so long and corrected the name in other languages to Türkiye, which it always was, we basically didn't change the name of our country, we changed the mistake made in the English language. : )
So, there's some tid bit information for you to have a great day, if you read upto this point you have a great night too, ohh just have a wonderfull life. : )
Best wishes. ;)
@@KenanTurkiyeBest wishes to you too buddy! Happy New Year 🥳 from Oklahoma, USA!
@@paulvamos7319 Best wishes to you too Paul, have a wonderfull time with your loved ones. Greetings to you all from Turkiye. :)
@@KenanTurkiyeok guy from meleagris
The "human error" problem came to my mind several times during the last part of this video, what's meant to provide additional info can steal attention instead, what's meant to help with planning can transform the logic behind it, and so on and so on. Don't underestimate human creativity when it comes to non-standart use of equipment.
I for one have NEVER EVER had a fancy piece of tech drastically fail for no reason at all.
/s
Yeah. Not sure I liked the ending.
Is that where the term "Loose as a Tailpipe!" came from? 😂 Non-standard use of equipment my a**, I need to release some stress! 🤣
Small mistake found about the US NGAD programs; It did begin as a joint program between the Navy and the Air Force, but has since been split into two completely separate programs. The US Navy's version is called the FA-XX, and the Air Force's is simply called NGAD, which isn't confusing at all. One of the biggest reasons the F-35 program was so expensive was the different versions with different requirements, and the different branches constantly fighting over what specifications were necessary. Multi-country joint programs have faced similar problems in recent years, where an agreement exists to cooperate on designs and production, but without consensus on key design decisions, most notably being carrier compatibility. As a result, the US military has decided to build two distinct airframes. Of course, they still share technology, and will likely end up using similar, or even some of the same components.
Indeed. Besides, the USAF NGAD would most likely be too big for Aircraft Carrier landings, as it might focus more on increasing its size so that it can store more armaments, and less on maneuverability for dogfights. In the latter case, that's where the CCA or Loyal Wingmen drones come in. Thus, the NGAD and its pilot is now relegated to a "quarterback" role as it both targets its enemies from extreme BVR, or give commands to its CCA drones to attack them instead.
Yeah, this NGAD/FAXX part of the video contained a few errors. But you're wrong to say "F/A-XX is the Navy's version of NGAD".
The USAF has a program called NGAD, that includes a (optionally?) crewed fighter called PCA, as well as some other parts.
The USN has a program called NGAD, that includes a (optionally) crewed fighter called F/A-XX, as well as some other parts.
What do you mean in recent years, multi-country projects have been breaking down for generations. See MBT-70 and the US sabotaging their NATO standard rifle trials so the FAL couldn't win and ignoring their own evaluation of intermediate rounds to appease the Cult of the Holy Garand.
@@jeremyholmaninteresting thanks, I'll look into it further, as I too was under the impression that the the NGAD is the air force version while the FA-XX is the equivalent Navy program, with the names showing the different roles the planes will play. The air force wants an air dominance fighter while the navy wants a fighter/attack plane that can control the skies and/or attack targets on the ground. The military is infamous for naming stuff in the most confusing way possible so it makes sense that this is too clear and intuitive lol.
Strange, I recall it being the other way around: starting as two different programs, then the branches were forced to work on a common design, JSF-style. I'd love to be wrong about that though.
That sponsor transition was class 👏
yeah his humor is always top notch. Love this Channel.
Emotional warfare
I believe the Next Generation Air Dominance (NGAD) program is not one collaborative program between the NAVY and Air Force anymore. Confusingly, both the Navy and Air Force have programs named NGAD but they are separate programs which might share some common parts. I believe F/A-XX refers specifically to the product of the Navy's NGAD program, not the Air Force's.
this is
correct
Air Force is NGAD & the navy is NJAD. So who is project mayhem for?
They shouldn't be the same program as both have different requirements but some level of integration could be very useful. Like for example the cars that Tesla makes. The Model 3 and Model Y are different but similar. One is an SUV and the other is a Sedan but they both share 70% of the parts which helps with cost reduction.
Soldiers using X-ray hacks 💀💀💀
He's hacking 😂
CHEATER
What's next aimbot? XD
fr 💀
@@amzi798yes
A glimpse of the future, new tactics in war
New doctrine in combat explored
As fast as lightning
There’s no time to mourn
A glimpse of the future and Blitzkrieg is born (sorry if this is a duplicate)
strike at zero hour with overwhelming firepower
they're fueled by the fear in their enemies eyes
Its a shock troop infiltration
The jetpacks may be okay for getting medics to an out of the way location or insertion to an undefended site but the noise of the system and vulnerability to fire without the ability to return fire means you won’t see it being used generally. Maybe as a really accurate but noisy parachute replacement (edit: for rare missions, not general purpose paratroopers). Landing on an enemy ship may make for a good visual test demo but it is the least likely thing for them to ever do with it.
They just need to add a hover hands free mode so pilot can fire airborne
I think it would be much better gear for fire fighters and rescue operations.
Let the boys have fun 😉
Seems like if you combined a lot of this tech into one big battle-suit, you’d basically be able to give your soldiers real life halo armor lmao
Lol more like IRL evangelion
EMP/big enough blast = wasted tech.
it might be useless but it's cool
@@huwale Hello, we are called humans here on Earth. We are carbon based life forms of many different backgrounds who live among a wide variety of animal and plant species. Welcome to our planet, where, if it's useless, there is absolutely nothing GD cool about it.
@@jameselliott216 what 💀
04:20 "It's like dating 5 girls but only being able to fu.... have fun, with one of them." Made me laugh out loud. Nice one there haha
Damn right....that was my impression, too😅😅😅😅
So gross 🤮🤮
That guy won't even find one with that attitude
Hey nwyt, never been this early and just wanted to day you are undoubtedly my favorite military youtuber!! Love your vids❤, they're always great
Glad to hear you enjoy our work!
Imagine boarding an enemy vessel with that jetpack and Iron Man / Black Sabbath blasting out... flipping badass
imagine getting shot and exploding midair
Some of the best researched videos anywhere. Thanks.
You forgot my aircraft vehicle
0:00 GYAT DAYM, I’M BOUT TO BLOW!
-The most devout Tech Priest.
AMBATUBLOW
@@Fake_Dozer TTS Fabricator General and his subordinates: IMBOUTA, CUHHHHHHHHHUgh AUGHHHHHHHHUGHHHUHHHH!
"It's like dating five girls, but only being able to f--- *have fun* with one of them."
xD you killed me.
Yet another great video, Thanks NWYT!
I wonder how LLMs or other AI analysis models will be available to help with strategy and logistics? Like an AI second in command adviser?
Also what happened to genetically modifying special forces into Super soldiers?
every sci-fi boy wet dream
Stop watchimg hollywood first
@@Kiyoonelol real
what do you mean what happened to genetically modifying special forces? that was never proposed and goes against internationally agreed upon human rights
@@fuckoff4705lol. lmao even.
4:18 quote straight from Barney Stinson's book
Sometimes I worry about our reliance on technology in the military. It looks like our system for producing weapons is such that we are getting increasingly detached from what is useful and scalable and cheap, and we have become 100% reliant on what is flashy and looks good on a powerpoint. Im not sure powerpoints are a viable defense strategy, though. Is our military really as good as we say? Or do we just have the most expensive and wasteful military there is?
We prepare for another WW2. Where we have planes fighting planes and all this fancy nonsense. But what actually happens in war? We fight in cities and urban environments. We fight insurgencies and enemies who use guerilla style tactics.
The great irony is that if we really wanted to protect our country; we would stop creating enemies with our foreign policy. But we don't do that. Instead; our foreign policy instigates wars and violence; as if we are trying to antagonize the world into giving us a reason to use all this military tech we paid for
The majority of the people involved in using these new weapons systems are people who staked their reputation on them being practical and worth the investment. The private sectors of the MIC are adding more and more complexity to systems to justify higher and higher prices, regardless of the practicality or utility of doing that. Some automated tech, specifically cheap dones, have absolutely changed the face of warfare. But yeah, most of this stuff is swept up in a positive feedback loop that justifies it's own spending. Probably could live in a world with fewer jetpacks, diesel powered dogs and smart tanks that includes better infrastructure and Healthcare but hey, someone's uncle promised someone's dad that this would get them both rich
Tell 'em 🗣️🗣️🔥
@@Spencergolde the only “good” thing(s) about the US's MIC are/is their propaganda movies - like Top Gun - and that sometimes some military tech ends up being useful for the rest of society
"The future of warfare
For all to be seen 1918"
"The new world approaches"
“Villers-Bretonneux”
I know this is going to happen
"Mechanized warfare"
8:40 we get closer to Ace Combat 7 every day.
Well done video good graphics good information
Hey there. Can you please cover common mines in a video like you did with grenades? I believe it would have good educational value, especially seeing wars in Ukraine and Israel.
The channel Real Engineering has also made a good video about this subject, and the de-mining challenge of Ukraine
4:23 im dead 😂 good one 👍
The constellation class frigate is already in production.
2:44 will alow them to look at 3d blueprints, look around corners, navigate, shoot accurately from the hip and more
that sponsor transition was wild ngl
It was all with the help of the ladies ...
@@NotWhatYouThink You probably never had the occasion to see many of them...
Ohhhh man!! Those jet packs are going to make all those jumping puzzles so easy!!
The funny thing is that by the time this stuff is made public the military is already phasing in the next generation of tech. Always one step ahead.
Or already silently dropping it just like the LCS and Zumwalt...
You think that everyone should have access to cutting edge military tech? 🤦♂️
Electronic firing pins, ultrasonic speakers, and microwave weapons and sonic weapons were not mentioned, but are amazing. I also didn't see laser weapons, coil guns, or rail guns.
11:11 bros gonna get a freaking R2-D2 unit 😂
Hands down best VPN ad ever
That old soldier with the knee braces..... He lifted all the way with his back haha, those kness didn't move until he was upright lmao
We are getting a few steps closer to creating the MJOLNIR series of Spartan armour that I wear..😮
We need to make it.
Yes
We still need to wait 500 years
M-Mjoelnear?
Ai having access to all military intelligence, thats literally skynet
What could *possibly* go wrong?...
I think its wild to just ask an AI how many missiles "Team Omega" has and how much we progressed in like 20 years, but you know the government keeps technology like this secret for a while you know they have computers as thin as papers and a whole bunch of other stuff
Super cool video! I usually enjoy your content but this one was simply fantastic! Thank you🙏
Ffff-fantastic episode!
8:56 Thats Awesome! The autonomous F-16 practice idea
The autonomous F-16s could be used as decoys or in high risk missions.
@@neilruedlinger4851 👉
4:24 bro was ALMOST sloppy
this channel has come so far
The buggy AI looking top mounted machine gun @ 18:51
I didnt know NWYT was a playboy lmao
I mean, it's in our name!
@@NotWhatYouThink it truly was not what I thought lmao
The next generation of soldiers are going to work from home & control a robot when needed...
Biggest fear: "Cannot connect to ... . Try again later"
the ad was wild
4:20 made my day, thank you
Imagine the world if we directed these resources, manpower, research, technology, innovation, and *_incomprehensible_* amounts of money towards the benefit of humanity .. instead of its destruction. ☮
Stop making so much sense
Using omniscient AI to positively redirect the economy/policy decisions we naturally keep screwing up due to human nature, to provide a truly egalitarian and equal chance at living life for everyone, is way less exciting than using it to blow up an apartment block that probably contained political dissidents. It all comes down to marketing
nah im greedy so i will continue selling death machines
That's just not how the world works. Not how humans work. We need to defend ourselves in order to survive and prosper. If we dont, someone else consumes us. Just how it is.
"All war is a symptom of man's failure as a thinking animal"
Everything I've heard says that the navy fighter is the FA-XX fighter, while NGAD is the air force project, and theyre separate projects. I haven't heard of the FA-XX replacing the raptor, it is to replace the air superiority fighter they currently have, which is the Super Hornet, while the F-35 C plays its usual ground attack/networking role.
4:14 Task & Purpose did a video on it a year or 2 ago, then they said it did put load off certain muscles but put more strain on others. He also did good videos on the hud goggles
Lol task and purpose that guy is a clown
@Burningarrow7 so are you but you are still here replying to my comment. Also funny how you go to personal insults rather than the video in question.
@@patrioticz2858What does me replying to your comment have to do with anything? You don't know me, but task and purpose is all over youtube so I can judge him. Please make sense in your replies
@Burningarrow7 thank you for dodging the point on throwing insults in Task & Purpose without giving a reason. Also I does make since and your response was just stupid because I never said anything about your personally... you high and paranoid? Also your an idiot because I referring to the video of Task & Purpose did on the technology I was referring to, and instead of talking about that video you just call him a clown without giving a reason which makes you look like a clown just like a kid calling another kid a butthead and the other says "how?" And the original kid is like "you just are"
@Burningarrow7 then me and others can judge you and your stupid opinion with no reasons to back it up like "he got this wrong" or "he isn't funny" or whatever
Thanks for the video.
Thank info sir
Very interesting.
EMP and jamming shielding will be very important.
What's the point of all this neural network if it gets shut down?
Well that's just bot allowed to happen
YOOOOOO ITS THE BIG TRACK
that VPN add was great
We need a part 2
The thing about AI is that you ALWAYS want a human controlling it in the background. Especially in the military.
If you're implying that it might turn on us, I don't believe that so. Why would we create a AI to turn on us. Sure you may think it just decides to do it one day like Ultron 💀, but even if that was possible, they'd make a countermeasure for a situation like that
@@RMPBuildsThat’s the problem with machine-learning, though; once its off and running, it is constantly improving itself based on what it is asked to do and the data it collects. That means you have to have some sort of kill-command that the machine itself is not aware of and that can be activated wherever the AI weapon is. Otherwise you might end up with a fully-autonomous weapon, and that sounds like a terrible idea.
I hope these AIs will reduce the chance of war crimes, because from what we’ve seen in the Middle East and Ukraine, that hasn’t been the case.. These tools need to be viewed as giving the ability to get diplomats to the negotiation table, not soldiers into graves.. We all want to go back to our families..
“It’s NOOOOOT what you think.”
DAM, I like that! Lmao.
I need my Call of Duty Exo suit now
Almost spat out my whiskey when he mention about 5 girlfriends
"But only being able to fffffff.." :D Caught me off guard lmao
"All war is a symptom of man's failure as a thinking animal"
Great video, from a great author!
Touch of Stealth Movie Plane nice😜
17:30 this guy is lucky af to drive that thing like that. I would trade everything for that job title.
The future of warfare?
STANDING IN THE LINE OF FIRE, 32 LEAD THE WAY!
Love that ad bro what a great segway
4:22 bro what 💀
6:19 has me hysterical 🤣😭
because I've never seen my government spend so wisely
1:44 I mean that’s not a awful price based on military spending budgets
Imagine somebody hacks their helmet displays and projects another image which transforms civilians into targets or friendly's into targets 🤔
NGAD is the air force version of the F/A-XX, which is the Navy version
We all are loving this trailer for WW3 :D
WW3 look lit🔥🔥🔥
3:10 Thai remind any1 else of mandalorians?
Nice video
This is amazing and scary at the same time.
At around $400k that jet pack costs about as much as a single Javelin training missle
Thats F__+ng funny, its brand new Thomas
Lockheed Martin is giving us Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare
There's a CGI video called "The last day of war". Check it to see our role in AI controlled warfare.
About time we get jet packs
"Imagine having 5 girlfirends but only being able to fu... have fun with one of them."
Lmfao
(It's in the ad read)
I am interested in the electric tanks. One of a tank's biggest responsibilities is sitting around doing nothing for a long time. The less sediment and hydraulics, the easier it is to loiter without damage along with faster start-up and turnaround from cold.
one of the main advantages was said to be the - relatively - silent running when using the E-Drive, Recon troops will appreciate that.
the smoothest sponsor transition
when you mentioned how heavy the backpacks were i though the next gadget would be a lighter backpack, but i guess an exoskeleton, i mean why, but also why not
I love how a lot of the b-roll is people pointing and talking
I hate to be That Guy, but unless all this tech is legitimately hardened against EMP, then it's doomed from the jump
^this.
also, if it doesn't work offline, it doesn't work at all.
all of these are incredibly vulnerable to jamming.
plus, these things will absolutely break eventually, and when that happens, the troops need to be able to work without them or risk destruction.
A good deal of militaries are already reliant on technology (as an example, cameras have long since eclipsed the MK I Eyeball in effectiveness at identifying faraway targets), so I’d imagine that these things are at least somewhat built with that in mind.
Besides, plenty of militaries are t Russia. Meaning they can actually deliver on a lot of this stuff.
Most military tech is built with EMP-hardening
You're not wrong.
4:21 This is the most hilarious thing I've heard from this channel. I almost burst out laughing.
Really was "not what i think"
Nwyt never fails to rail me from behind!🎉
🤔
@@Rahul_Singh20its true though
I don't see the Jet Suit being used in Warfare. Maybe used in police action, but not warfare. The US already build a jumpback back in the late 70s. It was a jetpack with about 20 seconds worth of burn time, allowing them to fly short hops. The quickly found it wasn't worth it in practical. Individuals are too easy to hit while flying around. As infantry you don't have much armor, nor are you moving that fast comparatively. Cover is too important for infantry to give up for a momentary movement advantage.
It could be useful in the military, just not really for combat.
*Israel and Palistine start war
USA : YEAAAH BOY, pull out the expensive prototype plans!
Jetpacks... FINALLY. gods that took a while.
wow never new it was this advanced
"- For All to be seen, 1918
The new world approaches
Villers-Bretonneux
Mechanized warfare...
Breaking away, coming your way
Standing in the line of fire
32 will lead the way
Coming over trench and wire
Going through endless grey"
- Sabaton,
The Future of Warfare
Standing in the lines of fire
Moving on through the fray
Coming over trench and wire
Live to fight another day
Pretty entertaining! What about those blimps that would be airborne aircraft carriers?! Should we expect them enter the battles any time soon?
"To F-.... Have fun with only one of them"
HAHAHA 😝