The T-14 Armata will likely be outclassed by new tanks by the time it finally enters into active service, which doesn’t seem very likely in the next decade, much less so this year judging by the state of its production.
Yes. They are obsolete. A waste of Taxpayer money. This is a sad sign of having nothing but old people in charge, they still think MBT's are anything but target practice for properly armed infantrymen.
@@jonathancummings6400 Tanks have numerous anti-drone system installed in them, modern tanks have their turret and several short air-defense system to protect against incoming drones and anti-tank missiles.
I can't say anything about T-14 Armata but Altay will be in service in 100 years aprox. I am a Turk but true... We don't have a tested and working engine and transmission yet. K-poppers dealing to make , maybe theirs works on ours. The best thing not to go on a fight ever. Peace is a thing you may not know value before you lose. As someone said, war is delightfull to whom never experienced it. Ukraine people are dying for Western interests. US wants to make Mother Russia busy not to cooperate with China soon.
So much hate for the Armata. Nobody throws in their brand new toys that are still in the pre-production phase and are being tweaked for the needs of the military. Russians are much better mass producting less complex machines like the T-90M that most of their army knows how to use. There is no miracle weapon, war in Ukraine has proved as much. When faced against a 155mm artillery shell, an attack helo and modern AT-RPGS there is a serious case to consider about the cost effectiveness of every weapon.
According to military sources, the Armata will replace the T-34 in the Russian army. This very reliable sources also added that the implementation of the Armata will take between 30-40 years until the last breath of T-34s in the main arsenal
@@polduseri909 yes, but it is hard to be sure just reading text. Sarcasm works best when you can pick up on tone of voice, body language and facial expressions, that is why I asked.
Yeah, as I was watching the video, I can imagine tank crew using the vr to assist in identifying targets and trouble areas for the commander and battle net through the fire and control. It seems novel, but could be one of the game changers.
If it enters service this year, which is doubtful, it will never see action because Russia can't afford to lose it in Ukraine. Russia can't afford to donate it to Ukraine like it donated its other tanks to Ukraine.
T-14 theoretically is ready to drive... theoretically it's already driving :D There are many other projects, that are on the go: AbramsX, KF51, K3. All of them is said will be ready somewhere until 2025.
The KF51 is more of a demonstrator vehicle similar to the Abrams x, it's built by Rheinmetall alone so the hull would still need to be redesigned as currently it's a leopard 2 hull obviously made by kmw, so it would take a good while before Germany swaps the leopard 2 out
Т-90М "Прорыв 3" ?. Эти высоко технологические танки изготавливается каждый день. Не объективная информация. T-90M 'Proryv 3'?. These highly technological tanks are manufactured every day. Not objective information.
WOW!!! The war in Ukraine has proven manned MBT's are obsolete, yet countries are still building new designs. Wasting their taxpayer's money, better suited for drone, and better quality anti mobile infantry type tech. All of this armor can be as easily destroyed as the Russian vehicles were, by well armed enough, and determined enough soldiers fighting guerilla style. I'm just shaking my head, it would have been as if after WW2, the USA had continued building new classes of Battleship instead of new classes of Aircraft Carriers. Tanks are actually more obsolete than Iowa Class Battleships. Only the USA, NATO allies, China and Russia and their main allies really have the ability to take them out. Since the same way Aircraft Carriers are protected, they could be protected, using Aircraft disable missile installations, and other ships to take out water based threats, like enemy Warships, mines, etc. Then maneuver the Battleship within range of its giant guns, and it would be as effective as in 1944, or the 1990 -1991 Gulf War.
Yeah this is not correct. MBT's still have a ton of usage if used correctly. The Russians were idiots in their training, tactics, maneuvering and assumption that Ukraine would be a push-over. Without enemy air superiority and high-tech AT teams the modern MBT is incredibly useful and deadly. With the next-gen APS being installed on most of them to defeat incoming AT systems, and proper troop support to suppress AT teams, even moreso.
@kilmer009 Seriously? If something needs that much protection, what's the point? Drones are the future anyway. It's why the USA Marines have abandoned the Abrams Tank. Tanks original use was as the Frontline attack unit in WW1, then replaced Cavalry, a great flanking unit, now it's a liability, requiring protection, bogging down, slowing an Army's advance. The Ukrainians did quite well without Tanks in the 1st year. They showed the future of ground war, mobile heavily armed infantry, with drone assets devastating the enemy troops from unexpected directions.
@@jonathancummings6400 Yes that's why every modern professional well funded military is either designing new tanks or buying them, and why the Ukranians are begging for those Leopard 2's, but please random guy on the internet, please tell me why those professional tacticians and militaries are dumb for spending billions on them. I've sat down, I'm all ears.
@@kilmer009 The same reason all of those military minds thought Horse Cavalry charges were still viable in 1914 at the beginning of WW1. The tech has advanced beyond the tactics and strategies they were trained in. Think about it, 10,000 Drones of various sizes and types would wipe out any number of Tanks. Also, one could literally manufacture Drones in WW2 Planes type numbers, in the hundreds of thousands. If I were in charge of a military, and we had that sort of army, Infantry, and a gigantic number of Drones plus Aircraft, I would shatter most armies out there with their outdated, but don't realize it like the Russians didn't militaries. The Russians have adjusted now employing powerful advanced Hypersonic Missiles.
The T 14 will be lucky if it enters service in large numbers by the 2040's or ever. Russia doesn't have the money or the materials for these projects and won't for a while.
![Lp. Сердце Вселенной #60 РОЖДЕНИЕ ЛОЛОЛОШКИ [Финал] • Майнкрафт](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YoR0pAV9FVQ/mqdefault.jpg)
Get exclusive NordVPN deal here: nordvpn.com/thebuzz
It's risk-free with Nord's 30-day money-back guarantee!
otokar arma II 2023 plise.
every year there are videos about the T-14 coming and it still isn't in service 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
It's coming alright, they're just waiting on a tow
APRAMS X 😍
You will probably have to wait even longer. They can’t even afford the Ukraine War.
it's an awesome tank and i love its design :)
There are already 20 T-14 in service. Inform you weel before laughing of your own ignorance. This year wiil enter more.
thankyou The Buzz 🐝🐝🐝, for tecnóloge the tanks ,😍🤩😀💋💋
There will be can-openers for all of them.
The T-14 Armata will likely be outclassed by new tanks by the time it finally enters into active service, which doesn’t seem very likely in the next decade, much less so this year judging by the state of its production.
If the Russian T-14 Armata was worth anything, they would have used it by now.
hows copin goin?
Waiting for the new KF51 Panther with 130mm and a good autoload-system without self-destruction like T14
What is "non-explosive reactive armor"?...Isn't reactive armor explosive by definition?
Better yet, what is a non high explosive fragmentation grenade?
Non explosive reactive armor is what the Russians use. It just means 'reactive armour' that has been in storage for so long that it no longer works.
Please a video on top 15 mbrls
I wonder which one has the best mine protection.
Hi Buzz. Good day for u!
The t14 will likely not be going into full rate production any time soon.
The Merkavah IV is being upgraded to the Merkavah V...
I’d like to see a “Most Useable MBT’s” parts of this list, wouldn’t exit. 🇨🇦 Veteran
Could you do a vid on all the MBTs serving in the Russo Ukraine war on both sides maybe one day, maybe wait till the Abrams get there then do it.
she will wait a year
Lol Drones would like to say hello and goodbye Mr MBT.
Yes. They are obsolete. A waste of Taxpayer money. This is a sad sign of having nothing but old people in charge, they still think MBT's are anything but target practice for properly armed infantrymen.
@@jonathancummings6400 Tanks have numerous anti-drone system installed in them, modern tanks have their turret and several short air-defense system to protect against incoming drones and anti-tank missiles.
@@niweshlekhak9646 Which are all insufficient now.
I can't say anything about T-14 Armata but Altay will be in service in 100 years aprox. I am a Turk but true... We don't have a tested and working engine and transmission yet. K-poppers dealing to make , maybe theirs works on ours. The best thing not to go on a fight ever. Peace is a thing you may not know value before you lose. As someone said, war is delightfull to whom never experienced it. Ukraine people are dying for Western interests. US wants to make Mother Russia busy not to cooperate with China soon.
NordVPN is very useful and protects my devices.
can she just use a different octave for "next we have" once in a while.
So much hate for the Armata. Nobody throws in their brand new toys that are still in the pre-production phase and are being tweaked for the needs of the military. Russians are much better mass producting less complex machines like the T-90M that most of their army knows how to use. There is no miracle weapon, war in Ukraine has proved as much. When faced against a 155mm artillery shell, an attack helo and modern AT-RPGS there is a serious case to consider about the cost effectiveness of every weapon.
The Armata is to be entering in service since the time of the Czars...
The T-14 has been tested in Syria and Ukraine. T-14 is mass-produced. Remember it, fool.
It's a special 'delaying' operation by the Russian military. 😂🤣
@@davidmccann9811 Enter the English troops into the territory of Russia, a fool.
T-59 has joined the chat💀💀
The T14 will be coming out in, 2023 or 2033 or 2043 or 2053 or 2063....etc.
ерунду не неси
Your sillyness enter in service...NOW😂🤣😅🤣😂
Это Америка с 1950 ых годов мечтает о гиперзвуковых ракетах, а у России они уже 65 лет как есть
The T-14 has been tested in Syria and Ukraine. T-14 is mass-produced. Remember it, fool.
@@ЕгорФролов-э2н Hypersonics have been useless and ineffective in Ukraine.
According to military sources, the Armata will replace the T-34 in the Russian army. This very reliable sources also added that the implementation of the Armata will take between 30-40 years until the last breath of T-34s in the main arsenal
T34, the World War2 tank?
@@stephenelliott1135 Do you know what sarcasm is?
@@polduseri909 yes, but it is hard to be sure just reading text. Sarcasm works best when you can pick up on tone of voice, body language and facial expressions, that is why I asked.
Give it a few months and Putin will send his stock of T-34s to Ukraine, as he will have nothing else left.
hahahaha i think they will need to bring up their old armored cars first
By the time the Armata finally enters service, we Brits will have a Challenger 6 starting production. 😂🤣
I dont agree with u r analysis, brahmos is super sonic missiles
come on top 15 best smartphones.
Upcoming UCAV
Lek-lurk😂
Lekleuuurk… it is too fucking words Le and Clerc….
I think the Merkava with its VR system appears to have the best UI. Probably also remote controllable.
Yeah, as I was watching the video, I can imagine tank crew using the vr to assist in identifying targets and trouble areas for the commander and battle net through the fire and control. It seems novel, but could be one of the game changers.
I think that's probably the best urban combat tank on the list.
Waiting new German mbt
The Panther KF51?
А меркава узко специализированныйтанк и это многое говорит
If it enters service this year, which is doubtful, it will never see action because Russia can't afford to lose it in Ukraine. Russia can't afford to donate it to Ukraine like it donated its other tanks to Ukraine.
T-14 theoretically is ready to drive... theoretically it's already driving :D There are many other projects, that are on the go: AbramsX, KF51, K3. All of them is said will be ready somewhere until 2025.
You forgot the new Panther KF51 New German Main Battle Tank, moreover, the T-14 will probably not be built, the tank is junk
The KF51 is more of a demonstrator vehicle similar to the Abrams x, it's built by Rheinmetall alone so the hull would still need to be redesigned as currently it's a leopard 2 hull obviously made by kmw, so it would take a good while before Germany swaps the leopard 2 out
is there a tank turret better designed, better-looking even, than that of the Merkava's? Sexy yet functional & effective.
The new Rheinmetall's Panther turret is ;-) Yet indeed the Merkava's turret looks damn cool!
In war, stealth and camouflage are more important than aesthetics.
@@frankdelahue9761 No doubt about that. Then again it looks cool.
@@frankdelahue9761 yeah whatever
Strv 122.
There not going to be in service they want a batch one 100 t14 to complete trials
The armata it's not going to see any active service you all see.
The T-14 has been tested in Syria and Ukraine. T-14 is mass-produced. Remember it, fool.
America always wins. Even if someone produced a slightly better tank they may produce 100 at the most and America will produce 1,000.
ARMATA 🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂
The T-14 has been tested in Syria and Ukraine. T-14 is mass-produced. Remember it, fool.
@@MrRoninGT are you dreaming?🤣😂🤣
@@romy0079 There are photos and videos. And you have only dreams.
@@MrRoninGT 😂😂😂 funny
@@romy0079 Don't be upset. These are all cartoons of the Kremlin😁
Lmao the armata is a mechanical nightmare they are probably gonna just be show pieces to the public either for the significant future or indefinitely
Т-90М "Прорыв 3" ?. Эти высоко технологические танки изготавливается каждый день. Не объективная информация. T-90M 'Proryv 3'?. These highly technological tanks are manufactured every day. Not objective information.
Ну и сказанул, "высоко технологичные", максимум слегка модернизированный т-72.
Trust me, it's practically everyday info since Ukraine captured one
If they are strong can all of tank in this video survive from 10 ICBM with crew inside.?
A Centurion tank once survived a nuclear bomb test, and the engine still ran afterwards. 😂🤣
армат вообше 20 штук есть
The T-14 has been tested in Syria and Ukraine. T-14 is mass-produced. Remember it, fool.
Откуда информация, сам считал?
откуда взять. русский секрет
That russian tank looks like the gophers popping up out of the two fore hatches could easily be decapitated. Nice!
WOW!!! The war in Ukraine has proven manned MBT's are obsolete, yet countries are still building new designs. Wasting their taxpayer's money, better suited for drone, and better quality anti mobile infantry type tech. All of this armor can be as easily destroyed as the Russian vehicles were, by well armed enough, and determined enough soldiers fighting guerilla style. I'm just shaking my head, it would have been as if after WW2, the USA had continued building new classes of Battleship instead of new classes of Aircraft Carriers. Tanks are actually more obsolete than Iowa Class Battleships. Only the USA, NATO allies, China and Russia and their main allies really have the ability to take them out. Since the same way Aircraft Carriers are protected, they could be protected, using Aircraft disable missile installations, and other ships to take out water based threats, like enemy Warships, mines, etc. Then maneuver the Battleship within range of its giant guns, and it would be as effective as in 1944, or the 1990 -1991 Gulf War.
yeah, goverments should lisen to Jonathan cummings youtube video comment 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Yeah this is not correct. MBT's still have a ton of usage if used correctly. The Russians were idiots in their training, tactics, maneuvering and assumption that Ukraine would be a push-over. Without enemy air superiority and high-tech AT teams the modern MBT is incredibly useful and deadly. With the next-gen APS being installed on most of them to defeat incoming AT systems, and proper troop support to suppress AT teams, even moreso.
@kilmer009 Seriously? If something needs that much protection, what's the point? Drones are the future anyway. It's why the USA Marines have abandoned the Abrams Tank. Tanks original use was as the Frontline attack unit in WW1, then replaced Cavalry, a great flanking unit, now it's a liability, requiring protection, bogging down, slowing an Army's advance. The Ukrainians did quite well without Tanks in the 1st year. They showed the future of ground war, mobile heavily armed infantry, with drone assets devastating the enemy troops from unexpected directions.
@@jonathancummings6400 Yes that's why every modern professional well funded military is either designing new tanks or buying them, and why the Ukranians are begging for those Leopard 2's, but please random guy on the internet, please tell me why those professional tacticians and militaries are dumb for spending billions on them. I've sat down, I'm all ears.
@@kilmer009 The same reason all of those military minds thought Horse Cavalry charges were still viable in 1914 at the beginning of WW1. The tech has advanced beyond the tactics and strategies they were trained in. Think about it, 10,000 Drones of various sizes and types would wipe out any number of Tanks. Also, one could literally manufacture Drones in WW2 Planes type numbers, in the hundreds of thousands. If I were in charge of a military, and we had that sort of army, Infantry, and a gigantic number of Drones plus Aircraft, I would shatter most armies out there with their outdated, but don't realize it like the Russians didn't militaries. The Russians have adjusted now employing powerful advanced Hypersonic Missiles.
Armata T-14 is that girlfriend you'll never meet because she lives in Canada.
The T 14 will be lucky if it enters service in large numbers by the 2040's or ever. Russia doesn't have the money or the materials for these projects and won't for a while.
@@dummynoob should we place a bet? 💰💰💰😎