How Xi Jinping’s authoritarianism is killing China’s economy | Business Beyond

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 8 тра 2024
  • China’s economy has been flashing red on various fronts for the past few years. A severe property crisis and the struggle to emerge from strict pandemic restrictions are routinely blamed for problems ranging from deflation to sluggish growth. But in this episode of Business Beyond, we ask if there are more fundamental reasons behind the world’s second biggest economy’s malaise. Under Xi Jinping, the Chinese Communist Party has become more controlling than at any stage in the past four decades. Does authoritarianism place a cap on economic growth? In this episode we ask if Xi's desire for control at all costs is the main reason why so many people, both within China and outside of it, have lost faith in a global economic powerhouse’s capacity to bounce back.
    And a special request to our viewers: we would love to hear what you think of Business Beyond. Fill in the survey here to share your thoughts about the show: surveys.dw.com/c/businessbeyond
    CHAPTERS
    Introduction - 00.00
    Double whammy: a pandemic and a property crisis - 01.42
    The confidence deficit - 04.25
    Is Xi the problem? - 7.37
    War of distraction? - 13.31
    Demographic disaster - 15.50
    A tech dragon? - 17.25
    Conclusion - 19.55
    Credits: 22.35
    Ends: 22.51
    Subscribe: ua-cam.com/users/deutsche...
    For more news go to: www.dw.com/en/
    Follow DW on social media:
    ►Facebook: / deutschewellenews
    ►Twitter: / dwnews
    ►Instagram: / dwnews
    ►Twitch: / dwnews_hangout
    Für Videos in deutscher Sprache besuchen Sie: / dwdeutsch
    #china #industrial #ccp

КОМЕНТАРІ • 2,3 тис.

  • @helenrushful
    @helenrushful Місяць тому +931

    Just the idea that you can force companies to sign agreements that hand over all their customer data to the the government on one hand and then be surprised when the rest of the world stops buying and investing in those companies. It’s juvenile

    • @PepeCoinMania
      @PepeCoinMania Місяць тому +25

      It’s their system and it works

    • @adolft_official
      @adolft_official Місяць тому +88

      C I A says hi

    • @mengreat6982
      @mengreat6982 Місяць тому +84

      Isn't US want rTikktok do the same?

    • @nasseq
      @nasseq Місяць тому

      @@mengreat6982 divestiture. If feds wanted data from American companies, the companies can always tell them to sod off, see Apple.

    • @phillip76
      @phillip76 Місяць тому +73

      U.S. does that too. This can 't be the factor.

  • @larsthorwald3338
    @larsthorwald3338 Місяць тому +674

    If you're a despotic Emperor, the last thing you want is a free, politically empowered population; you want obedient, loyal minions who worship you. Mao wasn't the least bit bothered by the starving millions around him.

    • @phillip76
      @phillip76 Місяць тому +75

      I think you just got a very naive mind, and a very very unrealistic view of the world.

    • @zenf5092
      @zenf5092 Місяць тому +11

      @@phillip76 "naive mind" - i approve of this definition. You can also say “alternatively gifted”. “Indigo child”, “person of an alternative mindset”.

    • @user-tf6mu6qf6e
      @user-tf6mu6qf6e Місяць тому +133

      @@phillip76Actually he has a very good grasp of history. Mao was one of history's greatest administrative bunglers. Incompetent.

    • @lsvaralokasf8249
      @lsvaralokasf8249 Місяць тому +14

      Mao is dead! Dude your mind is still in the past lol

    • @phillip76
      @phillip76 Місяць тому +12

      @@user-tf6mu6qf6e Are you talking about Mao, because I have no idea what Mao thinks. I was talking about modern Chinese leadership.

  • @LucasBustamante1
    @LucasBustamante1 28 днів тому +11

    According to these economy experts, the higher the house prices, the better. No matter if it's only 10% of the wealthiest individual that can buy them, it doesn't matter if most of the housing money are leveraged by banks, as long as the house price goes up, everything is fine. Yeah, that will work great with the demographics of 50 years from now.

    • @charleswomack2166
      @charleswomack2166 2 дні тому

      That was exactly how China used to think. Now they have been rudely awakened!

  • @deehazsnow3178
    @deehazsnow3178 Місяць тому +258

    Taking out Jack Ma sent a very very very bad economic signal

    • @carloschu7127
      @carloschu7127 Місяць тому +2

      That was one and a half years ago. ( about Jack Ma being threaten by ...... ) Meaning those who are still buy BABA thinking the shares are still cheap, are making crazy decision as an investor.

    • @carloschu7127
      @carloschu7127 Місяць тому +4

      And bad decision for who are still buying BABA shares.

    • @TuhunluunBionoid
      @TuhunluunBionoid Місяць тому +19

      It’s a very very good signal for the people: no capitalist is above the state in China. The state is for the people, and the capitalist is just one of the people, not above everyone else. China is a socialist country and it stays true to that intension.

    • @TheBarbahaba
      @TheBarbahaba Місяць тому

      @@TuhunluunBionoid socialist aka misfunctioning and corrupt ..
      but hey at least the citizens dont have freedom of speech to express the misfunction or the corruption so everything is dandy right wumao ?

    • @youxkio
      @youxkio Місяць тому

      Yep, everyone on higher echelons of the economy will be afraid of reaching the top.

  • @thom8728
    @thom8728 Місяць тому +138

    Announcing you intend to invade Taiwan is not helpful. It smacks of instability and has Russia like consequences for the economy. Who would invest in that market under those circumstances??

    • @kevinc1200
      @kevinc1200 Місяць тому +12

      China has made this statement since its founding, it did not stop foreign investments.

    • @zacklewis342
      @zacklewis342 Місяць тому +15

      @@kevinc1200 But their military, especially the navy, were completely incapable until recently.

    • @chickaboomboom2726
      @chickaboomboom2726 Місяць тому

      NOT HELPFUL FOR WHO, YOU ! TAIWAN IS PART OF CHINA, HOW CAN THE CHINESE INVADE ITSELF ! THE U.S PRESENCE IN ASIA IS NOT HELPFUL TO NO ONE IN ASIA BUT WASHINGTON

    • @user-tr5vs9gm4r
      @user-tr5vs9gm4r Місяць тому

      @@zacklewis342 Don't worry, they are just trying to scare the world and the world is becoming paranoid and it's working

    • @timmyg44
      @timmyg44 Місяць тому +1

      Especially so when they never had the intention of doing so.

  • @mateobravo9212
    @mateobravo9212 Місяць тому +65

    Liked this format. Just the right amount of concise and analyst insight with minimal drama. Greetings from Spain.

    • @freelife1014
      @freelife1014 Місяць тому +2

      It spews nonsense from the beginning. FDI to China last year was over USD 150 billion. How could it be 33 billion?

    • @MSDGroup-ez6zk
      @MSDGroup-ez6zk Місяць тому

      LOL, look at how the USA kills its allies' economy today while ExxonMobil always hits a new world record on net profit every time the US Democratic party wins the US presidential election. LOL

  • @hapah4894
    @hapah4894 25 днів тому +14

    Many Chinese people were buying and flipping real estate properties,
    but that sector has cratered, leaving many people holding the bags.

  • @jackkingslakes7917
    @jackkingslakes7917 9 днів тому +4

    There's nothing strange about this. The CCP is most concerned about its regime security. If it feels that his regime is unsafe, let alone economic development, it will not hesitate to sacrifice half of the country's people!

    • @user-cg6wb9zw2i
      @user-cg6wb9zw2i 2 дні тому

      They're trying to lift the other parts of the country out of poverty that's why they're not stimulating growth in property. They are also forcing companies to be more charitable. Yes heavy handed in controlling companies, but with a one party system they are not beholden to corporations. They don't care about the corporations, they're trying to have more even distribution of wealth. While in the west barely anyone can afford anything. If you read their mandate that's what they're trying to do

  • @naguoning
    @naguoning Місяць тому +139

    "without underpaying their workers" ummm do you understand why consumption is so low??

    • @user-hf2dr7sh4y
      @user-hf2dr7sh4y Місяць тому

      If the CCP authorities really cared about the Chinese economy and the hundreds of millions of poor people in China, they would create laws that made rich people spent most of their time wondering the country side looking for cheap things and food to buy, as opposed to buying houses, cars, and expensive meals in high-demand countries like Canada, Australia or the rest of the west, so that China's economy would rebound in a consumption-driven way. Instead of looking for the CCP's next target to bully after Hong Kong, Taiwan, and the Philippines.

    • @TheKkpop1
      @TheKkpop1 Місяць тому

      Chinese policy makers are frustrated consumer are not spending when Chinese had the very high saving (2.5 trillions). In the meantime, Chinese wages are improving in recent years, forcing many Chinese entrepreneurs to relocate low wages industries to lower income neighborhood.

    • @kimeli
      @kimeli Місяць тому +1

      volume or price index?

    • @ristromanov
      @ristromanov Місяць тому +4

      German companies underpaying workers around the world not the government's did you know about this?

    • @Scarlet_Witch888
      @Scarlet_Witch888 Місяць тому +5

      It depends on relative pay and in the high tech sector factory workers are being paid more than waiters and service industry personnel. Obviously if you compare to European and US standards almost the entire country is underpaid… but the cost of living is much lower

  • @user-dh3ji1ic8k
    @user-dh3ji1ic8k 26 днів тому +6

    Meanwhile let's talk about how Scholtz's democracy is bringing prosperity to Germany's economy, and how Biden's freedom is improving American's living standards.

    • @d.a.t.7723
      @d.a.t.7723 20 днів тому

      Not with a Chinese bot😅😅😅

    • @user-dh3ji1ic8k
      @user-dh3ji1ic8k 18 днів тому

      @@d.a.t.7723 看得出来你家里人4完了

    • @zacksmith5963
      @zacksmith5963 9 днів тому

      ​@@d.a.t.7723 cia bot spotted

  • @cathe3633
    @cathe3633 24 дні тому +1

    Don't see the survey but can say the coverage was well put together, easy to understand, and more importantly, hugely informative and relevant to global concerns for all.

  • @mondocanuck7873
    @mondocanuck7873 3 дні тому +1

    One issue with FDI (Foreign Direct Investment) that never gets mentioned is that China includes ALL profits earned by foreign enterprises and deposited in Chinese banks. So this is NOT direct new investment, but captive capital. And it truly is captive since the Chinese government does not allow these foreign companies to repatriate their profits back to their home countries or leave China in any way.

  • @jimmahoney7803
    @jimmahoney7803 Місяць тому +53

    Fear of investing. Fear of going to jail forever.

  • @ArabicReja973
    @ArabicReja973 Місяць тому +97

    Chinese 🇨🇳 property sector, which accounts for 30% of GDP, is crashing.
    - Exports and imports, accounting for 37% GDP, are down.
    - Foreign investment (FDI) is falling over 90%, lowest in 3 decades.
    - Foreign visitors are down 96% compared to the pre-pandemic level in 2019.
    - Consumer prices are experiencing deflation.
    - Youth unemployment hits over 21%, a record.
    - Its fast-shrinking workforce is 10 years older than neighboring countries.
    *Still, China keeps reporting outrageous GDP numbers.* Lol
    Where does the growth come from?

    • @Questioneverything2050
      @Questioneverything2050 Місяць тому

      China wants to property market to crash to make housing more affordable
      Exports are down because of “nearshoring”
      Geopolitics means that china doesn’t need FDI

    • @mochen9282
      @mochen9282 Місяць тому +19

      When property sector was OK and accounts for 30% of GDP, the GDP growth of China was 7%. It means that the GDP growth other than property sector was 4.9%. And now the GDP growth is 5.2% without bubble, in the mean time, people can also enjoy a low property price, I'd consider it a success.

    • @TheKkpop1
      @TheKkpop1 Місяць тому

      Hi troll
      You and Last Chang are the same person.
      Btw China economy will collapse in your dreams tonite and every nite

    • @AhmetTekin101
      @AhmetTekin101 Місяць тому +13

      ​@@mochen9282How? Did you go to school at all?

    • @baogiangtran1647
      @baogiangtran1647 Місяць тому +4

      Same story with the US stock market at an all-time high maybe

  • @richardwills-woodward5340
    @richardwills-woodward5340 Місяць тому +124

    Those demographic numbers are way, way out! They will lose 300 million by 2050 and 6-700 million by 2100. Those are Shanghai and Beijing University numbers. The 2050 population is expected to be 1 billion people. The over all population drop isn't even the story, it's the far worse (if that was possible) working age population. They are extinct in any meaningful sense. There will few people to consume and be educated enough to do so, and that assumes everything goes right! Also needs to be mentioned absolutely nobody believes the population numbers. If you look at ALL the evidence, the best guess is 1.3 billion in 2024, some say 1.280bn. There are 100m people that don't exist that were in the numbers faked by provinces for reasons of funding.

    • @pervertt
      @pervertt Місяць тому +24

      Finally, someone who doesn't taking Chinese government statistics at face value. I'd also take their claim of 5.2% GDP growth last year with a sackful of salt.

    • @elmohead
      @elmohead Місяць тому +8

      The 5% growth was not from China. That was from the World Bank. The same one that calced USA's 3% growth.

    • @colleenpeck6347
      @colleenpeck6347 Місяць тому +4

      30, 000 Chinese nationals have emigrated to the US in the past year through the US southern border.

    • @zacklewis342
      @zacklewis342 Місяць тому +3

      Actually, your numbers are too optimistic as well. Some estimates are a current population UNDER a billion, with the true figure somewhere around 1.1 to 1.2.

    • @rob3539
      @rob3539 Місяць тому +4

      Does anyone believe any official data coming from the Chinese gov't. Agencies get told what their annual target for the year is to be and know what happens to the head officials if its not achieved.

  • @ValenTIGER
    @ValenTIGER Місяць тому +114

    They are the master of deceiving that lasts long. Also the world is fooled from greedy expectation. Giving too much credit to dishonest liars!

    • @ssss8162
      @ssss8162 Місяць тому

      The only dishonest liars are the Western media. The same media who keep quiet on who bombed Nordstream

    • @1KentKent
      @1KentKent Місяць тому +1

      Can you explain? I don't understand what you're referring to.

    • @MichaelDembinski
      @MichaelDembinski Місяць тому

      If by 'they' you mean the Chinese Communist Party, you forget that party has been hijacked by One Man - not 'they', but 'he' - Xi. This is the whole problem with one-party states; if one man (and it's always a man) takes control of the party, he takes control of the entire nation. Democracy might not be perfect, but its checks and balances prevents that from happening.

    • @michaelgothenburg364
      @michaelgothenburg364 Місяць тому

      @@1KentKent I'm not going to write a book but after having worked with the Chinese for 27 years, and lived near (but not in) China for 33 years... It's true, They, as in the Chinese leaders, are the masters of deceiving. They know very well that democracy's greatest weakness is that democratic leaders cannot act without public support so they work subtly and slowly enough to not give democracy a chance to act. This has been the case for the 20 years I have followed this. Also do note that I like the vast majority of the Chinese, I specifically say the Chinese leaders

    • @avii5450
      @avii5450 Місяць тому +6

      @@1KentKent Pretty sure he's talking about USA and the dollar.

  • @c0smicbyte
    @c0smicbyte Місяць тому +172

    One-Child Policy (1979-2015) may be an Achilles Heel, not only of China's economy but, also of its military. If a war erupts involving the Chinese military, every Chinese military personnel killed or maimed in battle would produce two unsupported senior parents inside China, plus the grief of the loss of a single child. It may be fair to assume that a large majority of the Chinese military personnel at this time are single children, and the multiple losses of these personnel would have a psychologically destabilizing impact on the Chinese population.

    • @TheKkpop1
      @TheKkpop1 Місяць тому +12

      Sorry China is not interested war with NATO.

    • @mgronich948
      @mgronich948 Місяць тому

      @@TheKkpop1China is not interested in war with the US either. But China doesn't want to be another Iraq, or Afghanistan or Libya or Syria or even Ukraine. So it's building it military to deter the US from doing what the US does to every other country.

    • @anubizz3
      @anubizz3 Місяць тому +1

      China population problems not only happen in there..... Other western ally have similar problems...only immigration offset that... And alot of Western countries like us move to extreme right and want to decrease immigration drastically.. Not to mention China have alot of spare citizens unlike Western countries and mostlikely just run away like Ukraine when the war happens.

    • @l2qz711
      @l2qz711 Місяць тому

      @@TheKkpop1 China has been preparing for World War since Xi declared emperor

    • @l2qz711
      @l2qz711 Місяць тому +10

      @@anubizz3 你在这扯啥呢,把中国和发达国家比

  • @jimtalbott9535
    @jimtalbott9535 Місяць тому +137

    It’s fun to watch the comments of “What about the GEERRRRMAAAAN economy??”
    Yes, this is German YT channel, but this is their English version - kinda makes sense they’ll have a foreign focus.

    • @PepeCoinMania
      @PepeCoinMania Місяць тому +36

      It makes no sense since German does not have anything to teach others these days
      No army
      No economic grow
      Russians about to destroy them and they can’t even defend themselves 😂

    • @oldschool8432
      @oldschool8432 Місяць тому +65

      ​@@PepeCoinMania
      Freaking chinese bot

    • @baronvonjo1929
      @baronvonjo1929 Місяць тому +4

      It's funny to see someone say something like that but with Germany.
      I see people say the same thing about America. Lots of "America isn't the whole world"
      But this is literally a American website dominated by Americans. Same with many other websites. I would expect a Japanese website to be dominated by Japanese.
      Unless of course is like this where it might originate in one place but is aiming at a different demographic. Typically English speaking.

    • @RyanMWilliams
      @RyanMWilliams Місяць тому +2

      That's on France 24 English... "German economy buffeted by 'perfect storm'"

    • @inxiousinx7993
      @inxiousinx7993 Місяць тому +9

      ​@@baronvonjo1929 UA-cam dominated by Americans ?? you know some country like India(4 times US population), japan and the whole eu can use youtube too right ?
      i will use your quote for you. America isn't the whole world

  • @frankbirch3877
    @frankbirch3877 Місяць тому +1

    The wonderful Chinese culture and people deserve freedom. That's the way the economy will grow.

  • @concernedcitizens4110
    @concernedcitizens4110 Місяць тому +89

    There are similarities between China and Japan. The declining birth/fertility rate, the set up for a ‘lost decade’ and economic stagnation. However Japan have a much better capacity to deal with this issue as it’s already set up itself as an advanced economy and they’re also a liberal democracy that is part of Western Alliance in Asia alongside Australia, South Korea, New Zealand and maybe even India. In conclusion China’s crises could be even more dire than what Japan has experienced.

    • @pervertt
      @pervertt Місяць тому +20

      Only superficial demographic similarities. Japan managed to get rich before it got old. And while it is old, Japan doesn't have the gender disparity that plagues China. Millions of Chinese men will never marry or leave descendants. This has profound implications for a society schooled in Confucian ideals.

    • @jacksmith-mu3ee
      @jacksmith-mu3ee Місяць тому +6

      ​@@pervertt😂😂😂China 0 recession
      China 0 inflation
      Usa recession
      Uk recession
      France recession
      Germany recessing
      India recession
      Taiwan recession

    • @SelfProclaimedEmperor
      @SelfProclaimedEmperor Місяць тому +9

      ​@@jacksmith-mu3eechinas real gdp is likely shrinking. China's population shrinking. China has deflation which is worse than inflation. USA economy grew 2.3% last year.

    • @jacksmith-mu3ee
      @jacksmith-mu3ee Місяць тому

      @@SelfProclaimedEmperor Agreed . China lied
      They claimed their economy is rising by 5.2% , that's a lie . Real growth is 50% . Even usa is under chinese loans
      U are correct . West is a country that definitely exist on planet pluto
      No child policy in usa is making sure that west a country that definitely exists in your mom bedroom 😂😂😂😂 gets chinese exports

    • @jacksmith-mu3ee
      @jacksmith-mu3ee Місяць тому +3

      @@SelfProclaimedEmperor deflation doesn't shrink economy . Inflation does

  • @danilordizon
    @danilordizon Місяць тому +60

    Who would buy a crumbling substandard property wasting hard earn money.

    • @Jack-ne8vm
      @Jack-ne8vm Місяць тому +2

      Probably can't trust banks either. No investment of earnings really secure.

    • @user-qf7ud5de9h
      @user-qf7ud5de9h Місяць тому

      ​@@Jack-ne8vmif you can't save, you can't earn interest, so they aren't making money either.

    • @user-qf7ud5de9h
      @user-qf7ud5de9h Місяць тому

      Why did you defer the maintenance 20 years? So you could write off the depreciation? You can't have it both ways honey🍯🎳🏦God is just, not a liar like Rockefeller and krogers

    • @user-qf7ud5de9h
      @user-qf7ud5de9h Місяць тому

      They put the profits in offshore investments, and lose it, and don't pay dividends to the investors. That is why they lose, because they are stingy, and don't share like Endor.

    • @NewmaticKe
      @NewmaticKe Місяць тому

      They would if they expected prices to rocket

  • @teacherfavaro
    @teacherfavaro Місяць тому +1

    Great work doing this show

  • @user-bk1lo7qf3o
    @user-bk1lo7qf3o 24 дні тому +1

    No company wants to come, all want to leave, splendid.

  • @zhanglan6568
    @zhanglan6568 Місяць тому +33

    If you cannot have a objective judgement of Chinese economy, reality will.

    • @HarunRaffael
      @HarunRaffael Місяць тому

      Exactly. That's why China is doomed.

    • @Monkehrawrrr
      @Monkehrawrrr Місяць тому

      The reason why China is in trouble is the US is scared and had to halt foreign investment and use protectionism.
      US being evil af yet again

    • @garycmli
      @garycmli Місяць тому +1

      you mean the stock indices right?

    • @zhanglan6568
      @zhanglan6568 Місяць тому

      @@garycmli The stock index does not perfectly match with the economy.

    • @freelife1014
      @freelife1014 Місяць тому +4

      @@garycmli It spews nonsense from the beginning. FDI to China last year was over USD 150 billion. How could it be 33 billion? Just because China invested over USD120 billion overseas last year, then FDI to China was the difference between the investment absorbed and that going out? By this way of calculation, the US would have negative FDI figures.

  • @codacreator6162
    @codacreator6162 28 днів тому +3

    Next-gen American population will decline, too, if wealth inequality is not addressed.

    • @eutha6
      @eutha6 12 днів тому

      wealth inequality has evolved in America to be more of a serfdom-so as long as people believe they can become billionaires and are thrown enough bones, the inequality will persist until the ponzi scheme that is wall street collapses-the real hazard of this inequality is the evolution of the oligarchy-mini kings and their 'royal' dynasties. Welcome to the Gilded age pt.2

  • @PhillCurtis
    @PhillCurtis 20 днів тому +1

    More videos with this format but on a range of topics 👍 hello 👋 from the UK

  • @sanjungsagaconstructionsb387
    @sanjungsagaconstructionsb387 Місяць тому

    Nice to stay in Austin,JB, good choice, Mr Loo! 🎉congrats!

  • @chesh3712
    @chesh3712 Місяць тому +87

    Everyone should be pushing companies to devest in china, prevent war, strengthen friendlier countries economys.

    • @bubuneowoo6161
      @bubuneowoo6161 Місяць тому

      Foreign brands account for only 13 percent of China exports. Please stop exposing your ignorance in a public forum!

    • @kenho-wr5ul2rh7m
      @kenho-wr5ul2rh7m Місяць тому +18

      yea we are buying Mercedes and BMW less, we dont need Mercedes and BMW in China
      Germany is not friendly to us

    • @mgronich948
      @mgronich948 Місяць тому

      Everyone = US neocons. And it's working to an extent.

    • @PherPhur
      @PherPhur Місяць тому +12

      @@kenho-wr5ul2rh7m You need to buy from North Korea, Russia and Iran. Birds of a feather flock together

    • @TuhunluunBionoid
      @TuhunluunBionoid Місяць тому

      War mongering.

  • @NickCirella
    @NickCirella Місяць тому +40

    DW always has very fair and balanced reporting on most topics. Breath of fresh air!!!

    • @aniksamiurrahman6365
      @aniksamiurrahman6365 Місяць тому +9

      Breath of fresh air for ignorants. In reality it's just conforming your bias.

    • @kevinc1200
      @kevinc1200 Місяць тому +4

      Really, where is the scholar with the counter point to authoritarianism means bad economy? At least bring one guy that makes a counter argument. The argument was that authoritarian means too much control means bad. But it seems to me that the Chinese measures has been fairly restrained in reining in real-estate bubble, attempting to reduce debt, resisting large stimulus that got it into trouble since 2008 and cracking down on large internet monopolies. I think maybe the last one has some political motive to it too but also a reasonable economic justification. On the other hand, US government also intervenes massively in its economy by pumping out huge stimuluses every time there is a crisis.

    • @ff6790
      @ff6790 Місяць тому

      Balanced? They are leaning left

    • @aniksamiurrahman6365
      @aniksamiurrahman6365 Місяць тому

      @@ff6790 Nope. Instead, DW seems to hv their own universe. They report about that.

    • @sidimote
      @sidimote Місяць тому +1

      It is definitely not a balanced report. All the people interviewed agree with each other, which of course is also the editorial line of DW.

  • @satoshinakomoto4194
    @satoshinakomoto4194 День тому

    LOOK AT THE QUALITY OF THEIR PRODUCTS!

  • @numbersix8919
    @numbersix8919 Місяць тому +2

    Actually Chinese households were able to keep their homes, and not be thrown onto the street as in the _non-authoritarian_ US.

    • @OnMusicSoon1
      @OnMusicSoon1 26 днів тому

      the current auctioning properties in China stops count at 4 million. In other words, 4 million households are thrown out of their properties

    • @numbersix8919
      @numbersix8919 26 днів тому +1

      @@OnMusicSoon1 Nope.

  • @cyberslim7955
    @cyberslim7955 Місяць тому +23

    4:00 "Property down"? Half price and less in prime location is called a "free fall"!

    • @michaelgothenburg364
      @michaelgothenburg364 Місяць тому

      30-40%, not half

    • @NewmaticKe
      @NewmaticKe Місяць тому +2

      We're not yet at half but let's see

    • @cyberslim7955
      @cyberslim7955 Місяць тому

      @@michaelgothenburg364 You are right, but as a prop owner wanting to sell and cannot close with 40% off, then we are effectively at 50%! Even then we don't know if we can close a deal...

    • @michaelgothenburg364
      @michaelgothenburg364 Місяць тому

      @@cyberslim7955 I have heard of some sales at 30-40% off, I have not heard of any at 50%. I still think 30-40% is quite realistic, with many people not accepting to sell at all. Definitely a pretty bad situation over there

    • @MeeesterBond17
      @MeeesterBond17 Місяць тому

      I can understand them not wanting to use the term, but... yeah, can't argue with your point, that's bad news.

  • @kevinbyrne4538
    @kevinbyrne4538 Місяць тому +72

    China has fallen into the "middle income trap". China should have developed its domestic market as it developed its manufacturing sector. But now the cost of Chinese labor is higher than that in Vietnam and India; so foreign investment is leaving Earth's largest prison. Xi Jinping is worsening a bad situation: he threatens war with Taiwan; he tightens his grip on power; he prolongs the problems which were caused by the bursting of the real estate bubble (and spreads the problems to the banking sector); he pours money into the already excessively large manufacturing sector; he continues to pour money into useless infrastructure projects; he scares away foreign investors; ... the list is almost endless.

    • @EdeYOlorDSZs
      @EdeYOlorDSZs Місяць тому +7

      One of the reasons that so much money was poured into infrastructure is to inflate GDP figures (and to nourish the middle class worker ofcourse). Local governments are responsible for GDP growth and accepting money from Beijing to build useless bridges is an easy way to meet the target

    • @LouiseChong-xk5xp
      @LouiseChong-xk5xp Місяць тому +6

      Infrastructure are useless, US citizens will totally agree with u😂

    • @kevinbyrne4538
      @kevinbyrne4538 Місяць тому

      @@LouiseChong-xk5xp -- The poor province of Guizhou has as many km of highways as Japan has. Money and resources are being wasted in order to reach Xi Jinping's 5 percent annual GDP growth.

    • @CasperChicago
      @CasperChicago Місяць тому +2

      @@LouiseChong-xk5xp Totaly disagree! Roads/interstates, bridges, airports, shipping ports are all government (state & national) investments. Sports stadiums are useless. There is a reason that the richest US state/cities are on the east and west coast of the USA; they have ports of entry.

    • @LouiseChong-xk5xp
      @LouiseChong-xk5xp Місяць тому +5

      @@CasperChicago but when I visited, stadiums are well maintained, meanwhile I have to endure pee smell and flying rubbish at subway. Flying plastic bag on the road is a norm while riding car😬 remembered my first visit, I was like omg, it is totally gta

  • @thecorpooration
    @thecorpooration Місяць тому +1

    Great report, thank you.

  • @NeidlichesSchwert
    @NeidlichesSchwert 8 днів тому

    8:22 is the funniest picture of...defeated enthusiasm?
    ...downtrodden subservience?
    ...crushed resignation?

  • @nostriluu
    @nostriluu Місяць тому +43

    The effect DW overuses to switch between scenes makes me queasy. Can't watch it. Why not just switch scenes?

    • @sandponics
      @sandponics 26 днів тому

      They are possibly trying to brainwash you using subliminal marketing techniques. just ignore the impulse to buy anything.

    • @craigarmstrong3106
      @craigarmstrong3106 20 днів тому

      Yep. I stopped watching because of it.

  • @themtoniraniremaxbroker2447
    @themtoniraniremaxbroker2447 Місяць тому +7

    Very Good and Detailed Analysis, Many Many thanks DW!!

    • @MrManny075
      @MrManny075 Місяць тому

      BS lies, Reality is a lot different, China is in space with its own space station look up at night, and you see it, China has changed the world for good in the 80s a video used to cost over 100 dollars few people could afford a phone, thanks to the Chinese we all can afford things that used to be only for the few.

  • @waltarenouf7351
    @waltarenouf7351 29 днів тому +2

    I love DW. Simply superb journalism!

    • @famouschappi
      @famouschappi 26 днів тому +1

      Haaaahaaaa! 😂 if YOU say so.

  • @milfordjohnson2289
    @milfordjohnson2289 Місяць тому +1

    this sounds pretty sensible and rather accurate, my gut feeling is that this is an accurate analysis. thanks for the actually interesting and informative journalism :)

    • @sandponics
      @sandponics Місяць тому

      My feeling is that it will either rain or go dark before morning.

    • @milfordjohnson2289
      @milfordjohnson2289 Місяць тому

      @@sandponics oh well. too bad 😆

  • @geeglox
    @geeglox 23 дні тому +20

    If 5.2%-growth is killing, then -0.3% is dead.

    • @brotherbig4651
      @brotherbig4651 7 днів тому +1

      You need to add a discount to the numbers China reported. Do you believe an economy with 5.2% growth rate having huge number of people escaping to other countries for economic opportunities?

    • @dreadfulbodyguard7288
      @dreadfulbodyguard7288 7 днів тому

      @@brotherbig4651 Both are completely different things. People want to leave because west still has higher wages.

    • @brotherbig4651
      @brotherbig4651 7 днів тому

      @@dreadfulbodyguard7288 The problem is most of them did not want to leave before. You never seen this huge number of Chinese crossing the border in the past.

    • @dreadfulbodyguard7288
      @dreadfulbodyguard7288 6 днів тому

      ​@@brotherbig4651 Illegal migration is increased because now there are well established routes to enter US illegally from China.
      If you look at official data of high-skilled legal immegration, it has gone down significantly.

    • @brotherbig4651
      @brotherbig4651 6 днів тому

      @@dreadfulbodyguard7288 The route has always been there. Nobody invented it. It didn’t draw that much attention because the Chinese didn’t need it.
      The high skills legal immigrants are up by a huge amount. Simply check how many joined the H1B visa lottery in the past two years, and how long it takes to get a green card if you were born in China.

  • @TK199999
    @TK199999 Місяць тому +7

    Xi also doesn't want a internal consumption driven economy. Since that would increase wealth and increase the Chinese middle class or as Xi calls it 'weakness'. This makes the Chinese population more difficult to control and so Xi is more comfortable with China staying or become increasing poor than risk any loss of control.

    • @sandponics
      @sandponics Місяць тому +1

      Mao said that socialism should not be shared poverty.

    • @georgeinjapan6583
      @georgeinjapan6583 Місяць тому

      @@sandponics I agree with this quote. Maybe Xi should follow it.

    • @timmyg44
      @timmyg44 Місяць тому +1

      Yes, he does, but you can not develop an internal economy in the face of hardcore supply side economics.

    • @BoazKiriama-do3xy
      @BoazKiriama-do3xy 22 дні тому

      😂😂 you guys talk about chairman Xi as if you know t
      Him so well😂😂 good luck

  • @michaelhe512
    @michaelhe512 19 днів тому +1

    you forgot to mention most critical part that economical back stab from US and west

  • @aspendesign
    @aspendesign 9 днів тому

    That was excellent. Thank you for providing such an accessible view of the Chinese situation. Really. Well done.

  • @stuartdevaan
    @stuartdevaan Місяць тому +84

    Innovation comes from the freedom to trade and share ideas. Authoritarian systems have never been good at nurturing these freedoms and always fail. We are working hard here in the USA to make sure that authoritarianism doesn't take hold here with Trump and MAGA

    • @happyface4234
      @happyface4234 Місяць тому

      Too much FrEeDoM that they banned Pro-Palestanian protests in most European countries, by all mean... continue the pantomime-- not fooling anyone.

    • @TheKkpop1
      @TheKkpop1 Місяць тому

      Hard working american are robbed by exuberant taxes, student loans, house loans, health insurance, car loans and credit card, leaving you with no saving and debt every month. That's how the loving and caring capitalists work pretending to pay you high income but robbing you in return.

    • @alidasougi5256
      @alidasougi5256 Місяць тому +4

      absolutely agree. Well said!

    • @weixingyang898
      @weixingyang898 Місяць тому

      USA Freedom to trade?? The one to start a trade war and sanctions when can't compete with the competition?? Ha ha ha...

    • @ij4674
      @ij4674 Місяць тому

      Lol MAGAs call you the authoritarian ones.
      Every system has faults

  • @fofoqueiro5524
    @fofoqueiro5524 Місяць тому +44

    I don't think a well educated person would use the phrase of "killing" economics. There are ups and downs but none of any economics in the history has ever been killed.

    • @sokratesowly2256
      @sokratesowly2256 Місяць тому +9

      ya, "killing" is the word usually used by intention seeking youtube channel, quite cheap.

    • @LouiseChong-xk5xp
      @LouiseChong-xk5xp Місяць тому +2

      The quality of medias nowadays. Easiest job today as they can make story without going local for interviews

    • @lolilollolilol7773
      @lolilollolilol7773 Місяць тому +2

      Sinophobic media bias.

    • @nsebast
      @nsebast Місяць тому +2

      Western media: Genocide, killing, They think of the most sensationalist clickbait words to get you engaged.

    • @101lakeside4
      @101lakeside4 Місяць тому +1

      Incorrect. Japan entering the Second World War was due to economics.
      The fall of the Roman was due to economics. Can give you examples of dozens more if you wish.

  • @assassinsrequiem
    @assassinsrequiem Місяць тому

    This is compared to the USD.
    What about their own sustainability within BRICS?

  • @Smoothe932
    @Smoothe932 Місяць тому

    I enjoy watching / listening to your videos. I commute a couple of hours a day and will set up a playlist in the morning and listen to it throughout the day. When you have a foreign language speaker and just put subtitles under it, that part of the video is useless to me. I skip it. Sometimes I have time to catch it later in the evenings, but more generally, I just don't get to watch / listen to it. Dubbed over speech is a much better solution. Providing the actual foreign language does not make it more authentic. I have to trust your written translations. Please help.

  • @Tabula_Rasa1
    @Tabula_Rasa1 Місяць тому +23

    I can tell the reporter is so happy he cant contain his laughter when talking about the housing issue. When he is started talking about Xi wants a more balanced growth instead of bailing out those RE company, his reaction are so serious.

    • @janetkoster6243
      @janetkoster6243 Місяць тому

      Well china's housing situation is built on a pyramid scheme. So, it is kinda funny that the leader of a country should be overseeing such a fraud. And smiling all the while.....lol!

    • @dac545j
      @dac545j Місяць тому +5

      I cannot tell that.

  • @Jormunguandr
    @Jormunguandr Місяць тому +28

    Feels like government more into control of humans than economy

  • @agritech802
    @agritech802 Місяць тому

    Thanks DW, you're the best 👍👍

  • @Alvin-eq5rc
    @Alvin-eq5rc Місяць тому

    Thank you DW for the great documentary.

    • @jacksmith-mu3ee
      @jacksmith-mu3ee Місяць тому +2

      😂1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to
      a
      halt.
      1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a
      hard
      landing
      1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a
      dangerous period of sluggish growth.
      1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood ofahard landing
      for
      the Chinese economy.
      2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails
      hard
      landing risk coffin.
      2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landingin
      China.
      2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks
      a
      Soft Economic Landing
      2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing in
      China.
      2004. The Economist: The great fall of China?
      2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landingin
      China
      2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a
      Soft
      Landing?
      2007.TIME:Is China's Economy Overheating? Can
      China
      avoid ahard landing?
      2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China?
      2009 Fortune: China's hard landing China must find a
      way to recover.
      2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China.
      2011. Business Insider: A Chinese
      2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News
      from
      China: A Hard Landing
      2013 Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China
      2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China.
      201 5 Forbes: Congratulations, J You Got Yourself A
      Chinese Hard Landing
      2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China
      2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To
      Crash?
      2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the
      Chinese Debt Crisis
      2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall
      Started?
      2022. Cathie Wood: China's COLLAPSE Is FAR Worse
      Than Vou Think

  • @marioformosa4259
    @marioformosa4259 Місяць тому +13

    China's GDP growth is now "only" 5% per annum. Sanctions have been very successful. Against France and especially against Germany.

    • @alanssshh
      @alanssshh Місяць тому +1

      LOL

    • @michaelgothenburg364
      @michaelgothenburg364 Місяць тому

      If you had known anything about how China works, you would know that the numbers are manipulated at all levels, not only the top, and that not even the top knows the exact numbers

  • @lolilollolilol7773
    @lolilollolilol7773 18 днів тому +4

    One month later, "Gross domestic product (GDP) grew by 5.3% in the first quarter from a year ago, according to the National Bureau of Statistics on Tuesday. That beat the estimate of 4.6% growth from a Reuters poll of economists. It also marked an acceleration from the 5.2% growth in the previous three months."' (CNN)

    • @chillxxx241
      @chillxxx241 11 днів тому

      China’s GDP isn’t like that of the rest of the world. The rest of the world has analysis and freedom. China sets a goal and the people will lie, cheat, and steal to make that goal or face repercussions. Stop comparing authoritarian economies to free economies.

    • @marocziiko
      @marocziiko 8 днів тому

      @@chillxxx241 If your economies are so free why are you putting so high tariffs on Chinese goods? also why is bliken and yellen going to china to beg them to stop sending stuff to russian? and to tone down the production of cars and goods because the west cant compete with there prices? and why those german industries have to shut down because they cant buy cheap russian gas where is this free economy you are talking about if the market is truly free like you deem it the west would be doomed because they cant compete get out of here man !!!

  • @faketrump3605
    @faketrump3605 24 дні тому +2

    how about "DW resurrected Nazism in Germany"?

  • @atspecialtycements
    @atspecialtycements Місяць тому

    Great show keep it up

  • @gigachadsitler
    @gigachadsitler Місяць тому +66

    Germany 's largest trading partner is
    China

    • @k.k.c8670
      @k.k.c8670 Місяць тому +3

      Anyone who starts his post with 'as a man from Europe' as you have done elsewhere on UA-cam is almost always from the ex Soviet colonies or some small and poor, inconsequential European country.

    • @k.k.c8670
      @k.k.c8670 Місяць тому +1

      @@LoveLove-jg9ol says the tech dinosaur .. Just click on a profile and you see what he posted... Duh

    • @Masterrunescapeer
      @Masterrunescapeer Місяць тому +1

      Not by much, 2023 stats of Destatis (Germany's stats amt):
      Turnover (Export + import in 1k EUR)
      China 253 056 431
      United States 252 349 809
      Netherlands 214 789 029
      That gap between US and China is negligible.
      And it's mostly due to import from China, as Germany moves their supply chains away, you'll see that figure drop substantially.

    • @unconventionalideas5683
      @unconventionalideas5683 Місяць тому +4

      It doesn't look set to stay that way much longer.

    • @tedwong7037
      @tedwong7037 Місяць тому +5

      Germany's father and owner is
      US of A

  • @sidequestsally
    @sidequestsally Місяць тому +18

    When you have a debt driven economy that focuses on the political vs the market, this is what inevitably happens. You can't fool the market. And the market is the ultimate voice of the people.

    • @MishkataPingvin
      @MishkataPingvin Місяць тому +4

      Are you describing the US and Japan?

    • @tycobandit
      @tycobandit Місяць тому +1

      @@MishkataPingvinhe’s describing liberty, that’s essentially what a free market is all about.

    • @goeleal1520
      @goeleal1520 29 днів тому +1

      By that logic I think they have been fooling the market pretty well in the last decades.

    • @sidequestsally
      @sidequestsally 29 днів тому

      @@goeleal1520 There's an end to all things, and China is at the end of its money printing rope. If you are unaware of its deficit and local debit issues, then you haven't been paying attention. But don't believe me, just wait a year or two and read this receipt.

    • @tycobandit
      @tycobandit 17 днів тому

      @@goeleal1520 yeah, it’s called total government subsidization and cheap labor.

  • @rajatanshu
    @rajatanshu Місяць тому

    Wonderful insight into a very complex issue

  • @edwardallangabor850
    @edwardallangabor850 Місяць тому

    Excellent overview and insight.

  • @StandingWithUkraine
    @StandingWithUkraine Місяць тому +11

    Great, in-depth and informative journalism!

    • @jacksmith-mu3ee
      @jacksmith-mu3ee Місяць тому +2

      Bot

    • @monkeeseemonkeedoo3745
      @monkeeseemonkeedoo3745 Місяць тому

      @@jacksmith-mu3ee no u

    • @jacksmith-mu3ee
      @jacksmith-mu3ee Місяць тому

      WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Two years into office, President Donald Trump authorised the Central Intelligence Agency to launch a clandestine campaign on Chinese social media aimed at turning public opinion in China against its government, according to former US officials with direct knowledge of the highly classified operation.
      Three former officials told Reuters that the CIA created a small team of operatives who used bogus internet identities to spread negative narratives about Xi Jinping’s government while leaking disparaging intelligence to overseas news outlets. The effort, which began in 2019, has not been previously reported.

  • @ubcphysicsyangbo
    @ubcphysicsyangbo Місяць тому +9

    The West is of course happy about this, for better or for worse, rich Chinese are bringing them money overseas and investing in West locales where they believe prices will only increase. This has caused property value in immigrant-heavy jurisdictions to increase rapidly over the past several decades. Countries like Canada, Australia, etc.

    • @MegaFarah78
      @MegaFarah78 Місяць тому

      true

    • @fulltechahead
      @fulltechahead Місяць тому +1

      but these countries are now regulating chinese purchases of real estate (particularly in my country of Canada) much more strictly, so it is no longer going to be a 'safe haven' for rich chinese and their capital flight from their broken system

    • @discofrancais
      @discofrancais Місяць тому

      They touched on it in the video, but a prolonged downturn in China will be particularly harsh on Australia too.
      China is Australia's largest trading partner, accounting for $125bn AUD annually - 27% of all foreign trade. Although the 2 country's trade balances are almost neutral with each other.
      So as a result, the longer the downturn in China, the slower trade velocity may become impacting Australia's economy.
      Am Australian and pay close attention to this.

    • @LouiseChong-xk5xp
      @LouiseChong-xk5xp Місяць тому +1

      But when china price drop, u people say china is collapsing. So your price hike should be a good sign😂

  • @brianwalley2131
    @brianwalley2131 Місяць тому +2

    XJP grew up in Maoist China, and he looks back nostalgically on that period of authoritarian absolutist rule. He is not a pragmatist, he doesn't care about what has been proven to grow the economy, and he just wants to turn the PRC back to the kind of authoritarian country of his childhood, even if it didn't work then and isn't working now.

    • @zacksmith5963
      @zacksmith5963 Місяць тому +1

      1990. The Economist. China's economy has come to
      a
      halt.
      1996. The Economist. China's economy will face a
      hard
      landing
      1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a
      dangerous period of sluggish growth.
      1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood ofahard landing
      for
      the Chinese economy.
      2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails
      hard
      landing risk coffin.
      2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landingin
      China.
      2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks
      a
      Soft Economic Landing
      2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing in
      China.
      2004. The Economist: The great fall of China?
      2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landingin
      China
      2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a
      Soft
      Landing?
      2007.TIME:Is China's Economy Overheating? Can
      China
      avoid ahard landing?
      2008. Forbes: Hard Landing In China?
      2009 Fortune: China's hard landing China must find a
      way to recover.
      2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China.
      2011. Business Insider: A Chinese
      2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News
      from
      China: A Hard Landing
      2013 Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing In China
      2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China.
      201 5 Forbes: Congratulations, J You Got Yourself A
      Chinese Hard Landing
      2016. The Economist: Hard landing looms for China
      2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To
      Crash?
      2020. Economics Explained: The Scary Solution to the
      Chinese Debt Crisis
      2021. Global Economics: Has China's Downfall
      Started?
      2022. Cathie Wood: China's COLLAPSE Is FAR Worse
      Than Vou Think

  • @simplelogic9090
    @simplelogic9090 Місяць тому

    Alot of these problems are happening in the USA. However we are already dealing with it and it's something we can handle.

  • @inxiousinx7993
    @inxiousinx7993 Місяць тому +7

    Expect a dire crisis graph and chart supporting the argument.
    Dont see any graph data that will do what the title said in the video. strange

    • @marygem
      @marygem Місяць тому +2

      Facts speak with or without a graph.

    • @guydreamr
      @guydreamr Місяць тому +3

      Strange that you don't need a graph when interviewing experts with knowledge on the matter.

    • @tedwong7037
      @tedwong7037 Місяць тому

      well usually western media is not based on data, its meant to push narratives.

    • @tedwong7037
      @tedwong7037 Місяць тому +1

      are you sure? facts are just words you like to listen? it sounds so indian.@@marygem

    • @marygem
      @marygem Місяць тому +3

      When the CCP can produce accurate and timely charts, you will be able to see them. Hasn't happened in past 60 years, so don't get your hopes up.

  • @jlangenberg
    @jlangenberg Місяць тому +21

    China shouldn’t be expecting to sell EV’s in USA.

    • @f1racer908
      @f1racer908 Місяць тому +6

      lol, they'll be building them in Mexico, and selling it anyway, as made in Mexico

    • @jlangenberg
      @jlangenberg Місяць тому +1

      @@f1racer908 Owner is Chinese and trade deals can be abridged

    • @DineshTwanabasu
      @DineshTwanabasu Місяць тому +7

      @@jlangenberg US government is not allowing Americans to buy or use whatever goods they want, American business are not allowed to do business with whoever they want. So who is a dictator here?

    • @jlangenberg
      @jlangenberg Місяць тому +4

      @@DineshTwanabasu when was the last time you bought cocaine? What time must you leave the bar? Government has become a controlling element but if are seriously comparing USA to CCP China I really think you need to spend some time in today’s Hong Kong

    • @DineshTwanabasu
      @DineshTwanabasu Місяць тому +1

      @@jlangenberg Don't worry, world is changing and today over 140 Countries has China as the largest trading partner. World is enjoying Chinese goods. Its The US citizens that were not allowed to choose.
      Again who is dictating its people and companies what to do and not to.

  • @siggyincr7447
    @siggyincr7447 25 днів тому +1

    Scott Kennedy saying they should celebrate China's economic rejuvenation is ridiculous. The CCP traded China's future for short term growth. And by every model I've seen, it's outlook is nothing to celebrate.

  • @naelalshowaikh612
    @naelalshowaikh612 27 днів тому

    yeah but we also have a global financial crises and that could also be a contributing factor if not the decisive factor

  • @Andre_XX
    @Andre_XX Місяць тому +4

    Inflation being "healthier" than deflation??!! Only an economist could say that!

    • @CautionBarrier
      @CautionBarrier Місяць тому +2

      Tell me you don't study economics without telling me you don't study economics.

    • @Andre_XX
      @Andre_XX Місяць тому

      @@CautionBarrierAnother group-think economist! So making everyone's wealth keep shrinking is a great way to make people prosperous and confident about their future? You ought to be awarded the faux "Nobel Prize" they award to economists.

    • @NewmaticKe
      @NewmaticKe Місяць тому

      Deflation is a spiral you see

  • @jasonhutchinson8060
    @jasonhutchinson8060 Місяць тому +29

    Its easy to grow your economy when you are selling everything below the cost of capital and simultaneously leverage up every level of government spending with huge amounts of zero interest debt while in a real estate bubble. Until the music stops.
    Ask yourself one question: would you choose to hold an apartment in Shanghai over that of New York, Paris, London, Zurich, Tokyo?
    No, you would not. For reasons that are obvious to all. Even the Chinese. So Capital has started to act accordingly. Its leaving.

    • @antukin146
      @antukin146 Місяць тому +5

      they are trying to conive with Chinese nationals living in foreign lands to compete with the local businesses in the goal of monopolizing the market.. like in our country some Chinese national will be able to sell an expensive component at a very low price because they are able to get it in china at a very low price and without the need to pay upfront.. I'm not sure how they are so confident that the Chinese living abroad will be sure to pay them back but maybe that's why there are pseudo Chinese police in Canada or in other countries.. I'm not sure maybe just my conspiracy theorists. maybe I'm crazy 😂 but there's alot of Chinese businessmen able to start a business with almost nothing on their pockets..

    • @tedwong7037
      @tedwong7037 Місяць тому +4

      i will easily choose Apartment in Shanghai over NYC, ive been living in both, at least Shanghai is perfectly safe, i never walked home after 11pm in NYC, no matter how close i was to home, i will take a cab, i dont want some desperate homeless people threaten me from the dark alleys. my life is precious.

    • @TuhunluunBionoid
      @TuhunluunBionoid Місяць тому +2

      Chinese work hard and efficient to produce more with less, but somehow it’s a sin, because it’s “producing below the cost of capital” according to you.
      I have never heard that being hard working and smart is a bad thing. Jealousy is over flowing in your heart.

    • @TuhunluunBionoid
      @TuhunluunBionoid Місяць тому +3

      A lot of people would love to hold a real estate in Shanghai, but they can’t afford it, you are an example.

    • @TuhunluunBionoid
      @TuhunluunBionoid Місяць тому +2

      Shanghai is safer, cheaper ( outside buying property) and has way better infrastructure than NYC or London. You need to travel more, not just sitting and imaging things.

  • @veo1960
    @veo1960 Місяць тому +2

    That's it! I'm hereby subscribe to Your channel. DW is the best regarding information on a global scale. Chapeaux!

  • @nikolas_5629
    @nikolas_5629 Місяць тому +2

    US+allies "China 'll soon collapse"...Chn "they dreaming our collapse for 2decades, forget bout those drunken super power, they even couldnt stand straight"😅

  • @krisjustin3884
    @krisjustin3884 Місяць тому +7

    At the same time, house prices have escalated beyond affordability for many young families in the west and food prices have been alarmingly high! China’s railway and public transportation system also puts us to shame. I wouldn’t write them off at this stage.

    • @TuhunluunBionoid
      @TuhunluunBionoid Місяць тому +2

      Only smart one here.

    • @krisjustin3884
      @krisjustin3884 Місяць тому +2

      @@TuhunluunBionoid Count yourself into the elite group of 2!

  • @ladrenadavis4358
    @ladrenadavis4358 Місяць тому +16

    Great reporting

    • @jy592
      @jy592 Місяць тому +4

      Bushit

  • @rhysmcgreal8786
    @rhysmcgreal8786 29 днів тому

    Just imagine how powerful China's economy would be if it was a democracy

  • @simonac688.
    @simonac688. Місяць тому

    Your show is # 1 no dought 👍👍

  • @AK-ej5ml
    @AK-ej5ml Місяць тому +17

    One thing which wasn't discussed: The Chinese working age population has been falling since 2015 - this followed decades of rapid growth in the workforce. From here on in Chinese economic growth will require productivity growth and/or an increasing participation rate.

    • @icet6665
      @icet6665 Місяць тому

      THEY USING MORE ROBOTICS IN THEIR FACTORIES

    • @AK-ej5ml
      @AK-ej5ml Місяць тому

      @icet6665 They might be, but Chinese labour productivity growth has still been trending down for decades - currently at 4.2%. So, with a shrinking workforce, economic growth will be below this unless the participation rate can be increased.

    • @jliang70
      @jliang70 Місяць тому +1

      @@AK-ej5ml Chinese skilled labor force is still at 200 million and highly skilled work force is at 60 million. Even with a demographic issue their productivity is increased by 20% over the last four years. In term of industrial output the growth has been average about 11.5 from 1990 to 2023 over the 33 year period.

    • @timmyg44
      @timmyg44 Місяць тому +1

      This would be a definite problem if China was already developed, but China has an untapped and forgotten population who have never been part of Chinese economic miracle who are a ready and waiting resource?

    • @AK-ej5ml
      @AK-ej5ml Місяць тому

      @timmyg44 True, that population is there, so there is potential - however in recent years, even with the shrinking population, it doesn't look like they are joining the labour force. But often this sort of thing moves slowly, so hopefully China finds a way to increase the participation rate.

  • @uckBayNguyen
    @uckBayNguyen Місяць тому +39

    China have a white elephant so huge, it doesn't fit in the room. Look out the window at that belt and road initiative. Beautiful thing, ain't it?

    • @ankpms830
      @ankpms830 Місяць тому

      Of course it is beautiful thing, China spend money to build infrastructures while USA spend money on war

    • @SelfProclaimedEmperor
      @SelfProclaimedEmperor Місяць тому +2

      ​@@peterseth3296western countries have the wealth to pay their debt, china does not

    • @jacksmith-mu3ee
      @jacksmith-mu3ee Місяць тому

      AgreedAgreed . China lied
      They claimed their economy is rising by 5.2% , that's a lie . Real growth is 50% . Even usa is under chinese loans
      U are correct . West is a country that definitely exist on planet pluto
      No child policy in usa is making sure that west a country that definitely exists in your mom bedroom 😂😂😂😂 gets chinese exports

    • @jacksmith-mu3ee
      @jacksmith-mu3ee Місяць тому +3

      ​@@SelfProclaimedEmperor which country is named west ?

    • @downtomars6268
      @downtomars6268 Місяць тому +1

      @@SelfProclaimedEmperor printing dollars does not count.

  • @MrAB-xc9du
    @MrAB-xc9du Місяць тому

    FDI is one amongst other Economy indicators, however economy already has problems of booms and slump etc, as I think

  • @jeciel85
    @jeciel85 Місяць тому +1

    He doesn't care about his people.

  • @BengalTiger-di7gn
    @BengalTiger-di7gn Місяць тому +33

    What about our economy ????

    • @mengreat6982
      @mengreat6982 Місяць тому +19

      Shhh ........ Divert people attention

    • @RyanMWilliams
      @RyanMWilliams Місяць тому

      Check out France 24 English for news on the German Economy

    • @alloutofbubblegum7271
      @alloutofbubblegum7271 Місяць тому +2

      Whataboutism.

    • @doujinflip
      @doujinflip Місяць тому +1

      Then watch the German language version. This channel is foreign language for foreign focus.

    • @anubizz3
      @anubizz3 Місяць тому

      ​@@doujinflipthen that's a problem because other countries English channel also cover their own country problem.. Not only doom and gloom news about foreign countries.

  • @user-lb1qn6wf6c
    @user-lb1qn6wf6c Місяць тому +5

    China has a surplus of hard currency reserve, probably more than any country in the world. Why FDI will be the main deciding factor in their future prospect as far as they can keep their competitiveness?

    • @doujinflip
      @doujinflip Місяць тому

      Because they'd also be spending it just as fast. China's capital controls means its main value globally lies in being able to liquidate into USD or EUR even more worthless currencies like Argentine Pesos -- CNY itself isn't widely trusted to hold its value and be worthy to collect.

    • @tedwong7037
      @tedwong7037 Місяць тому

      the western media is trying to summon the investers to pull out of China, actually Chinese govt is not concerned about that, China now is not that much depended on FDI TBH, if you dont invest, then Chinese capitals will share the growth, as long as the production efficiency remains high, cost of manufacture is relatively low, i say China will continue to have trade surplus and gradually become richer, with or without foriegn investment. so im not sure DW has positive or negative influence to investers at the end of the day.

    • @theonlycaulfield
      @theonlycaulfield Місяць тому +1

      China also has the highest gross debt of any country in the world, having overtaken the US.

    • @jacksmith-mu3ee
      @jacksmith-mu3ee Місяць тому

      @@theonlycaulfield usa is under chinese debt

    • @theonlycaulfield
      @theonlycaulfield Місяць тому +2

      ​@@jacksmith-mu3ee Less than 10% of US government debt in the form of treasury securities are held by China.

  • @hungnguyen-tr4cn
    @hungnguyen-tr4cn Місяць тому +1

    people do not think of how they going to pay a rent, real state fee double of your monthly salary and if you loss your job then what..of course you will lose the house and everything else

  • @gezalesko3813
    @gezalesko3813 Місяць тому +1

    it so good that here everyting is under control...

  • @user-cu4eb2un5d
    @user-cu4eb2un5d Місяць тому +9

    Everyday I wake up I give thanks I was born in the US and not China or some other god forsaken place.

  • @innocentnicholus3264
    @innocentnicholus3264 Місяць тому +43

    I am more worried of the Germany economy than of China

    • @OliverDykes
      @OliverDykes Місяць тому +11

      bot

    • @alloutofbubblegum7271
      @alloutofbubblegum7271 Місяць тому +12

      A German is 4-5 times richer then a Chinese.

    • @DBGE001
      @DBGE001 Місяць тому +24

      @@alloutofbubblegum7271Don't worry, that is changing very very fast.

    • @alloutofbubblegum7271
      @alloutofbubblegum7271 Місяць тому +8

      @@DBGE001Not at all. Germany was one of the poorest countries after WW2 and their success is much greater then China's.

    • @LarkRoberson
      @LarkRoberson Місяць тому +1

      Then WHY are you watching a new channel that hyper focuses on Geopolitical News? Sounds dumb.

  • @thomassimmer5186
    @thomassimmer5186 Місяць тому +1

    Very nice job overall. A few significant omissions: Why no mention of simultaneous support of Russia's aggression against Ukraine with serious bullying its neighbors? Also, why not emphasize fear by businesses of losing all their assets similar to what happened in Russia? Finally, stability of the supply chain is a huge concern after the lockdowns in China made businesses invested in China suffer. Diversification of supply overcame lowest cost sourcing as the most important consideration. There are huge imbalances in China due to property, local government and banking problems and there is no free discussion so who will tell the emperor the truth so that these imbalances have a chance of correction.

  • @gesnow
    @gesnow 25 днів тому

    It’s not safer, you need to ask why people are leaving the country including HK.

  • @starlet88sg
    @starlet88sg Місяць тому +2

    very balance point of view. thumps up.

    • @davidwong5197
      @davidwong5197 Місяць тому

      Not really. US has the same problem with the commercial sector. Local banks are going out of business. Not covered. Germany the home country 2 out of 3 companies moved and GDP growth is projected to be 0.5%. At least China's contraction is intentional to make housing more affordable. Rent went up 40% in US last 3 years.
      Yes China has problem so does everybody else. The world is in trouble and we are still arguing who is doing worse.

    • @famouschappi
      @famouschappi 26 днів тому

      Haaaahaa! No.

  • @agentoxide
    @agentoxide Місяць тому +13

    22 min. of think tank market fundamentals and supply-side freaks talking about Chinese markets without any single voice or prospective from Beijing or Shanghai about their own economy. How is journalism?

    • @CautionBarrier
      @CautionBarrier Місяць тому +8

      You should already know that Chinese nationals are not allowed to say the economy is doing poorly.

    • @tedwong7037
      @tedwong7037 Місяць тому +4

      where did you get that idea, BBC?@@CautionBarrier

    • @SelfProclaimedEmperor
      @SelfProclaimedEmperor Місяць тому +1

      ​@@tedwong7037where jack ma?

    • @SelfProclaimedEmperor
      @SelfProclaimedEmperor Місяць тому

      China always lies about it's economy, why as them. They exaggerated their economy 300%

    • @SelfProclaimedEmperor
      @SelfProclaimedEmperor Місяць тому

      China always lies about it's economy, why as them. They exaggerated their economy 300%

  • @panglilla868
    @panglilla868 Місяць тому

    Two things can give Chinese society positive: free education and healthcare for those who are majority struggling for making a living.

  • @alaindelon611
    @alaindelon611 4 дні тому

    Great coverage.

  • @burprobrox9134
    @burprobrox9134 Місяць тому +16

    The constant push for growth. Surely a nice steadiness is an option

    • @jimmyrichards5595
      @jimmyrichards5595 Місяць тому +2

      There has to be a “constant infinite growth” when the money that the system is made of, is constantly being debauched, debased, and devalued.
      Here in the country that I live in, that is signified by the $35 Trillion National Debt… heading to what? Headed straight for Infinity. How much National Debt should there be? Debt is not wealth. The National Debt should be Zero.
      I highly recommend you look into precisely what happened to the Gold Standard and exactly how it was “removed” in the U.S.
      It will be interesting for me to see if UA-cam removes my post. When I have posted the facts about what happened to the Gold Standard, I’m used to seeing my post completely disappear, with no explanation of why. Here, I have not posted what happened to it. But I am wondering if it will be removed for simply talking about the “Gold Standard”.

    • @mrcool7140
      @mrcool7140 Місяць тому

      This is German state media. Extremely neoliberal, constaly paddling worldwide billionaire interests. GDP is the only measure they are interested in. So what did you expect.

    • @jameslong9921
      @jameslong9921 Місяць тому +1

      The thing about growth is that it is always accompanied by decline and that is not something to be feared or fought against.
      Show me one example in the natural world where something only grows and never dies, decay is simply the one side of the coin, growth being the other. The sooner we acknowledge and accept that the less unrealistic expectations we will have about our economy's in general.

    • @jimmyrichards5595
      @jimmyrichards5595 Місяць тому

      @@jameslong9921 So, you don’t fear contraction in the economy? What about what is called ‘deflation’ in the monetary system? It appears to me that most all the people “in charge” of the monetary system talk about deflation as if it is the BOoGeYMaN. We can’t be having that! People will lose their jobs and there will be a recession. But it seems to me that’s what we had during the “Financial Crisis” of 2008/2009. Is this what happened during the Great Depression of the 1930’s?
      But here is something that, during my lifetime I have only ever seen grow, and never come back down. As in, come back down to earth. The National Debt. I’m thinking that at some point, there must be a reckoning of the National Debt. There is no free lunch, the piper must be paid. But our leaders appear to treat it as if it can go to infinity.
      And something that is never talked about is the fact that this Nation used to be on a Gold Standard, and… what exactly and precisely happened to that Gold Standard? It was done away with Presidential Executive Orders, and nothing else. It didn’t go through Congress and had nothing to do with the will of the people. Why didn’t Congress do anything about the removal of the money that was of the people(government does not have a monopoly on the creation and production of gold). Apparently when it comes to the Gold Standard, Congress is just a potted plant, that sits there and does absolutely nothing. Thanks Congress!/s
      The reason I hammer on the Gold Standard is, Gold is not Debt. Historically it has been a representation of wealth, not the indigent. And, look what happened to it. Look what happened to our wealth! It has been and is being, turned into Debt. Gold pays the piper and extinguishes debt. But hey, that’s just me. And as I always say(or ask), “What do I know?” 😄
      Well, I can say that I know what happened to the Gold Standard!

    • @sandponics
      @sandponics Місяць тому

      Are you a communist?

  • @usahoangsatruongsa
    @usahoangsatruongsa Місяць тому +7

    Already forgot what Xi had done to Jack ma and his BABA company ?

    • @AJ-jx5gm
      @AJ-jx5gm Місяць тому

      Add Tencent to the list. CCP has killed growth & wealth of big companies in China for many years in order to maintain a tight grip on power.

  • @cezaryadamski8786
    @cezaryadamski8786 Місяць тому +1

    China grows at 5% per year and are by far the largest manufacturer in the world. They are fine.

  • @guydreamr
    @guydreamr Місяць тому +42

    As the video itself says, one thing to bear in mind is that with the possible exception of the oil monarchies, no nondemocratic country has *ever* escaped the middle income trap.

    • @bubuneowoo6161
      @bubuneowoo6161 Місяць тому

      Another ignorant China collapse story. Western media is so pathetic!

    • @ylstorage7085
      @ylstorage7085 Місяць тому +5

      if they are number 2 already by not even reaching middle income trap yet, you really want a democratic China? You think a Democratic China will be less beligerent and competitive?
      China's per capita GDP is lower than Russia and Argentina right now. Yes, that Russia and that Argentina, right now.

    • @guydreamr
      @guydreamr Місяць тому +15

      @@ylstorage7085 1. Yes. More democracy means a better world. 2. Yes. Democracies get in far fewer wars with each other than authoritarian powers do. Conclusion: A democratic China is far better for international relations than an authoritarian one.

    • @TheKkpop1
      @TheKkpop1 Місяць тому +2

      ​@@guydreamr
      China gdp per capita is more than 12k mark.
      Do you have any problem when monarchy, junta and democracy failed to work except communism in modern Chinese history? Democracy is a process, the end product is better income, healthcare, peace, prosperity, education and good living standard.

    • @guydreamr
      @guydreamr Місяць тому

      @@TheKkpop1 Communism failed in China too, how did the Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution work out? Such a failure, in fact, that it was abandoned by Deng in favor of a mixed economy, or "socialism with Chinese characteristics."
      China's current GDP per capita of 12K places it firmly in the middle income camp. And if history is any guide, unless it strikes oil, there it will remain until it chooses democracy.

  • @socrates5647
    @socrates5647 Місяць тому +35

    DW the past: CCP control everything.
    DW today: CCP not able to control ppl's spending.

    • @weird-guy
      @weird-guy Місяць тому +1

      People always find ways, cpc restrited gaming kids used parents id´s, great firewall just use a vpn, cpc doesnt want you to sell housing for undervalued just use gold bar as payment ect ect

    • @user-rj9ee7hw8u
      @user-rj9ee7hw8u Місяць тому

      During the seventy years since its founding, China has trained engineers equivalent to the total population of Germany

  • @akshaysood1667
    @akshaysood1667 Місяць тому

    Good one .
    Not sure how the Banking Sector doing in China given the indebted Propert sector

  • @danielodey7775
    @danielodey7775 Місяць тому +1

    The Soviet Union industrialied quickly, last century and living standards rose . However, by the end of the 70's there was little improvement , each year . This contributed to the rise of reformers like Gorbachev.

  • @ubcphysicsyangbo
    @ubcphysicsyangbo Місяць тому +4

    Increased authoritarism is always a bad sign, BUT on the flip side, lack of government regulatons can lead to what we have here in the West, where social media companies perhaps have become more influential than the governments themselves, in either subtle or obvious ways. The West (esp in America) is being dominated by these tech monopolies right now, and we are either blind to or completely ignoring it lol.

  • @obinnaezealah2465
    @obinnaezealah2465 Місяць тому +10

    Oh look, the "China is going to collapse" 2024 edition.