Can China's Economy Survive Trump 2.0?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 24 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,9 тис.

  • @MrRedsjack
    @MrRedsjack 13 днів тому +1442

    Higher tariffs would push Chinese factories to move some parts of production, like final assembly in places like Vietnam, Thailand, Cambodia and other asian nations. Making the item 90% in china but finishing it abroad to escape the sanctions. So the impact would likely be limited but it would greatly benefit other developing countries around it.

    • @ru2225
      @ru2225 13 днів тому +228

      They do this using Mexico already🤣

    • @yensteel
      @yensteel 13 днів тому +89

      Even US made stuff is like that.

    • @jeremiahbell6129
      @jeremiahbell6129 13 днів тому +79

      Other countries will also fill the gap. Indonesia and India are already producing many goods that the Chinese market isn't able to provide cheaply anymore.

    • @AEgir347
      @AEgir347 13 днів тому +72

      And american citizens will pay the tarrifs as they did during the last trump presidency which saw a decrease in spending power and a decrease in GDP directly because of the tarrifs he imposed.

    • @KamBar2020
      @KamBar2020 13 днів тому +13

      SLAVA 🇹🇼

  • @uplink-on-yt
    @uplink-on-yt 13 днів тому +1095

    "We will hurt th Chinese economy!"
    "How?"
    "By ruining their primary market: America."

    • @akirathedog777
      @akirathedog777 13 днів тому +7

      Mansplaining.

    • @armandoventura9043
      @armandoventura9043 13 днів тому +1

      And then China put its factories in Mexico

    • @azliaheaven
      @azliaheaven 13 днів тому +115

      🤣🤣🤣 USA literally depends on some of the cheap chinese products and commodities. I don't think the internal manufacturing replacement plan is going to workout as USA wants.

    • @diegoz_74
      @diegoz_74 13 днів тому +70

      ​@@azliaheaventrump is also against raising the minimum wage so we cooked

    • @akirathedog777
      @akirathedog777 13 днів тому +14

      @@azliaheaven are you profesionally ignorant?
      chinese wages are rising and its no longer the most competitive country for cheap manufacturing, thats being taken over by mexico in nearshoring and companies will still offshore to south africa, bangladesh, philipines etc.

  • @shack2800
    @shack2800 11 днів тому +45

    People have a bad habit of thinking one singular thing will tank an entire country

    • @tlocksl84
      @tlocksl84 5 днів тому +1

      because most people think very small

  • @currawong60911368
    @currawong60911368 13 днів тому +710

    Tariff is a tax. On consumers. So a sales tax. First politician I've seen get elected on a promise to increase taxes.

    • @0bsmith0
      @0bsmith0 13 днів тому +108

      Brexit..

    • @yofedstyhrega4594
      @yofedstyhrega4594 13 днів тому +36

      He also said he was going to reduce tax and reduce the American debt. Idk if he has any idea or listened to a single meeting he's been part of to get things so wrong.

    • @azliaheaven
      @azliaheaven 13 днів тому +102

      -"i promise to raise taxes and cut subsides, not for the rich but for the rest of you"
      -gets elected with unprecedented support.

    • @SeverusFelix
      @SeverusFelix 13 днів тому +11

      He's always been a sly one.

    • @WorldIsWierd
      @WorldIsWierd 13 днів тому +9

      what about the retaliatory tariffs that china puts on america good would by that logic ruin their economy?

  • @VannrithSourisVa
    @VannrithSourisVa 13 днів тому +1255

    in the end, American consumers will pay more.

    • @nathanielclaw2841
      @nathanielclaw2841 13 днів тому +289

      @@jameschalkwig787 what financial stability? tariffs on all imports will wreck the economy and cause inflation to return at full force

    • @MustraOrdo
      @MustraOrdo 13 днів тому +90

      @@jameschalkwig787 Who/What guarantees that?

    • @blondelp8451
      @blondelp8451 13 днів тому

      @@jameschalkwig787 Biden added 15+ millions jobs. Trump lost 3 millions jobs. Facts.

    • @Gigachad101-i8g
      @Gigachad101-i8g 13 днів тому +126

      Americans voted for Trump to fix the economy but his policies would ironically make it worse 🤣🤣
      Since when USA has been manufacturing locally to impose such tariffs on other Nations
      Manufacturers would simply place the burden of inflation on the heads of end consumers 🤡

    • @tiglishnobody8750
      @tiglishnobody8750 13 днів тому +22

      @@jameschalkwig787 You know that USA is more dependent on import than export and crackdown on import with triaff is sound like best idea ever

  • @JoeJon-o6l
    @JoeJon-o6l 13 днів тому +517

    so is china economy collapses yet? you guys been saying it will collapses since 2016, that is the longest 30 days ever btw

    • @jumbomuffin1316
      @jumbomuffin1316 13 днів тому

      Maybe look at the economic reports and you’ll see just have the Chinese economy is. It won’t collapse because of the population but growth is questionable, especially considering how much the communist party is hiding

    • @joyfrog123
      @joyfrog123 13 днів тому

      as long as Gordon Chang and his anti china goons still roam the internet, expect more of those monthly china collapsing videos

    • @MagicWandn
      @MagicWandn 13 днів тому

      really thought tldr and every other european were gushing with glea even up to a year ago about how China is gonna pass the USA as the next super power and the next century is the china century. LOL

    • @giantWario
      @giantWario 13 днів тому

      ...Yes it has already collapsed. Their real estate crash is already as bad as the 2008 crash was here and their deflation is reaching levels only previously seen during the Great Depression. And that's according to their official released figures, who knows what the real figures are.
      Just because we don't really care that it's happening doesn't mean it's not happening.

    • @zannierzan9634
      @zannierzan9634 13 днів тому

      It doesn't need to collapse for the working class to suffer. By getting high on capitalism and treating workers poorly, socialism is anything but pipe dream in China, especially the inequality is somehow even worse than the US.
      If China won the trade war and dominated the global economy, the true victor would be capitalism.

  • @yensteel
    @yensteel 13 днів тому +923

    Survive? Yes. Suffer? Yes.

    • @NCR-National-Reclamation-Gov
      @NCR-National-Reclamation-Gov 13 днів тому +35

      Collapse? Yes.

    • @waynegore5291
      @waynegore5291 13 днів тому +93

      Masturbation? Yes.

    • @Nostrama
      @Nostrama 13 днів тому +102

      Hotel? Trivago

    • @peppefailla1630
      @peppefailla1630 13 днів тому +14

      ​@@Nostrama👺👺👺👺👺👺 Bros a man of culture

    • @KimGameDev
      @KimGameDev 13 днів тому

      CCP is doomed for failure. They hate the Chinese people so why should the Chinese people tolerate CCP anymore?

  • @MollyShorters
    @MollyShorters 3 дні тому +415

    Yo, this video hits differently! Been hustling, saving, and finally sitting on a $167k emergency fund, ready to dive into investing. But man, this whole "China vs Trump 2.0" saga? Makes me wonder if I should just keep stuffing my cash under a mattress. 😂 Any headstart tips for someone who's finally ready to stop being a savings hoarder?

    • @blissds-gi3mb
      @blissds-gi3mb 3 дні тому +4

      First off, congrats on stacking up that $167k-it’s no small feat! But hey, keeping it in a mattress? Nah. Politics aside, markets always find a way to move. My two cents? Get a financial advisor. Mine turned my timid first steps into actual progress. Trust me, worth it!

    • @MollyShorters
      @MollyShorters 3 дні тому

      You guys are making it sound so easy. I’m ready to make moves, but the whole “find an advisor” thing? Feels like searching for the Holy Grail. Any advice on where to start or who to trust?

    • @blissds-gi3mb
      @blissds-gi3mb 3 дні тому +4

      There are a handful of CFAs out there. I’ve experimented with a few over the past years, but I’ve stuck with Linda Aretha Reeves for some years now, and her performance has been consistently impressive. She’s known in her field-look her up.

    • @MollyShorters
      @MollyShorters 3 дні тому +1

      I looked up Linda Aretha Reeves, and wow-she seems like exactly what I needed to kick off my financial journey. Thanks for the solid recommendation!

    • @CharlotteJacobsons
      @CharlotteJacobsons 3 дні тому +3

      Caught Linda Aretha Reeves at a finance summit on Bloomberg four years ago-her presentation was phenomenal! Glad to hear she’s still on top of her game.

  • @claireNymans
    @claireNymans 5 днів тому +512

    "Okay, so I’ve been stacking my pennies (and by pennies, I mean $223k in my emergency fund, lol) and now I’m ready to dip into investing. But can someone explain to me how I’m supposed to feel about Trump 2.0 potentially throwing shade at China’s economy? Like, is this my sign to go all-in on U.S. stocks, or do I hedge my bets globally? Someone throw me a bone here."

    • @NancyFranciss
      @NancyFranciss 5 днів тому +3

      "Nice stack there, my dude! But honestly, it’s all noise until you’ve got a solid strategy. I used to overthink this stuff too until I brought in a financial advisor. Best decision ever. A good one can help you navigate the chaos without losing sleep. Trust me."

    • @VeronicaOlivers
      @VeronicaOlivers 5 днів тому +1

      Y’all are making good points, but finding the right financial advisor feels harder than picking stocks. Any tips on where to even start? I need someone legit who can make my money work while I figure out what all this Trump-China drama means

    • @NancyFranciss
      @NancyFranciss 5 днів тому +4

      "There are a handful of CFAs. I’ve experimented with a few over the past years, but I’ve stuck with ‘Linda Aretha Reeves’ for some years now, and her performance has been consistently impressive. She’s known in her field-look her up."

    • @claireNymans
      @claireNymans 5 днів тому

      Checked out Linda Aretha Reeves, and wow, she looks like exactly what I need to get my financial act together. Thanks for the solid recommendation!

    • @MollyShorters
      @MollyShorters 5 днів тому +1

      Watched Linda Aretha on a Bloomberg Finance Summit four years ago, and her presentation was pure gold. She definitely knows her stuff-good luck!

  • @dannydenison6253
    @dannydenison6253 13 днів тому +76

    Tariffs are pointless unless they're targeted with a substantial industrial policy. Which is not something America has had for a long time

    • @jackhumphries1087
      @jackhumphries1087 11 днів тому +2

      The point is to encourage more production within America, rather than buying from other countries

    • @svenrio8521
      @svenrio8521 11 днів тому +2

      ​@jackhumphries1087 Yes which is why funding ALSO has to be given to new factories. You can't have one without the other

    • @thetaomega7816
      @thetaomega7816 11 днів тому +7

      ​@svenrio8521 IRA lead to just that? Manufacturing is booming in US

    • @buddermonger2000
      @buddermonger2000 11 днів тому

      America gained one under Biden, who largely was continuing Trump's policies

    • @sentryion3106
      @sentryion3106 10 днів тому

      I mean that’s what Biden is doing. He restricted high tech exports to China while giving massive incentives to companies to build high tech manufacturing in the U.S. with the chips act.
      A shame that the U.S. voters love vibe over their own interests

  • @Intriguing444
    @Intriguing444 13 днів тому +522

    Can the US economy survive Trump's isolationist strategies?

    • @User122-ty
      @User122-ty 13 днів тому +54

      Can but will end up on the level of Brazil

    • @landenjones9374
      @landenjones9374 13 днів тому

      Bro the whole point of the tariffs are trumps attempt to bring manufacturing back to America and cut income taxes that's really not a bad idea and many president's have been trying to do this just none have been this extreme about it.

    • @shinji1264
      @shinji1264 13 днів тому +41

      ​@@User122-tygood y'all already have enough diversity to look like Brazil population

    • @butthebitebitbit
      @butthebitebitbit 13 днів тому +10

      @@User122-ty VAI BRASIL

    • @User122-ty
      @User122-ty 13 днів тому +5

      @@shinji1264 we speak only about the weight in the world economy.
      Brazil is big but ...

  • @jackofnone500
    @jackofnone500 12 днів тому +42

    1) China has been diversifying its export market 2) Unless US manufacturers can innovate and push cost down, tariffs will result in inflation and limited growth 3) China set manufacturing bases in strategic countries such as in Mexico to avoid tarrifs

    • @crosslink1493
      @crosslink1493 12 днів тому +1

      China is tempering that a bit. Best example is pulling back from letting their companies do big investments in EV/hybrid auto manufacturing to serve the European markets. Best reason I've heard for this is they want to keep domestic manufacturing going on this key (for them) market so as not lay off a lot of Chinese employees. Also the possibility of just doing final assembly in Euro-focused factories vs finding local parts suppliers at those new factories. Good example (although just from my personal observations) of this final assembly tactic are the television brands Hisense and TCL, their TVs I was looking at last weekend were labeled 'Made in Vietnam.'

    • @buddermonger2000
      @buddermonger2000 11 днів тому

      US manufacturers have been innovating and pushing costs down. So much so we brought textiles back to the US.
      Chinese export market has arguably failed in its diversification due to the low purchasing power of the countries it's trying to export to via belt and road.
      Mexico is used by both America and China for manufacturing. Realistically China moving manufacturing to Mexico is a win for America.

    • @jackofnone500
      @jackofnone500 10 днів тому

      Textile is a low complexity product while for high tech goods such as car, electronic devices, battery, solar modules US remains uncompetitive. Ofc its contributing to but not all due to cheaper labor. China is good in scaling up manufacturing technologies and ramp up productivity

    • @buddermonger2000
      @buddermonger2000 10 днів тому

      @jackofnone500 That's actually my point. The product is so low in complexity that it's basically only made using women and sewing machines, and thus incredibly sensitive to labor costs which is why it's historically been made overseas until within the last year or two.
      However, manufacturing in the US has advanced enough that it's made it cost competitive to return back to domestic shores.
      Thus, I present it as evidence of the continued advancement of American manufacturing.
      China is currently doing a lot of those middle tier goods, and it looks like the US manufacturing can now do even some of the low-end. Thus, realistically, the play for the US is to continue investment in Mexico in order to regain a "domestic" source of those technologies as they're roughly cost competitive.
      As an addendum, IIRC most cars in the US are, in fact, made in the US, but under foreign companies such as Toyota.

    • @jackofnone500
      @jackofnone500 10 днів тому

      @ and that’s exactly my point also. Its not all about cheap labour that gives China its competitive advantage. China successfully scaled up advanced manufacturing technologies that boost productivity and quality, which matter even more when it comes to higher tiered products. EV and solar module are good examples for this case

  • @billyboi955
    @billyboi955 10 днів тому +7

    Obviously protecting Tesla with the 200% increase on electric vehicles

  • @hydroac9387
    @hydroac9387 13 днів тому +340

    Famously, Trump own merch (the Make America Great Again hats and the like) is made in China. Oh, the irony...

    • @GabibboReall
      @GabibboReall 13 днів тому

      Famously, This has been proven to literally be false. and is only true to what is NOT made by Trump and the "Made in China" Maga merch is sold by third parties. shut up and get facts straight bub

    • @halahmilksheikh
      @halahmilksheikh 13 днів тому +80

      They aren't. Fake ones yes but they ahve their own factory in Carson CA

    • @leoym1803
      @leoym1803 13 днів тому +54

      @@halahmilksheikh Hey man, careful with facts here, they don't like them around these places!

    • @evilsanta8585
      @evilsanta8585 13 днів тому

      @@halahmilksheikhbro the Make America Great Again was made in a Chinese factory and Trump bought th lot for $300k. People tracked it down

    • @Student17625
      @Student17625 13 днів тому +1

      The USA Can't manufacture everything it imports from china, so in the end, US consumers will have to pay high prices for cheaper goods because the Federal government will pocket that tariff for itself. Tariffs make the government rich and citizens poor.

  • @PASCALDAB
    @PASCALDAB 10 днів тому +1072

    In these uncertain times, it's more important than ever to have a solid understanding of how to manage your finances, invest wisely and navigate economic downturns. But my primary concern is how to grow my reserve of $240k which has been sitting duck since forever with zero to no gains, sure I'm all in on the long term game, but with my savings are lying waste to inflation and my portfolio losing gains everyday, I need a remedy.

    • @viviancarolgioao
      @viviancarolgioao 10 днів тому +2

      If you need advice, consider speaking with a financial advisor. Don't get me wrong, you can do it on your own, but financial advisors have a lot more knowledge and expertise in this area.

    • @DonaldStokes-p
      @DonaldStokes-p 10 днів тому +1

      you are completely right, Advisors have information and paths that are not disclosed to the public.. I profited $560k in 2023 under the tutelage of my Fiduciary-counselor. Am I selling? Absolutely not.. I am going to sit back and observe how this all plays out.

    • @SeanTalkoff
      @SeanTalkoff 10 днів тому +1

      This is huge! think you can point me towards the direction of your advisor? been looking at advisory management myself.. seeking ways to invest and make more money with the uncertainty in the economy.

    • @DonaldStokes-p
      @DonaldStokes-p 10 днів тому +1

      My CFA ’’ Sharon Ann Meny, a renowned figure in her line of work. I recommend researching her credentials further. She has many years of experience and is a valuable resource for anyone looking to navigate the financial market..

    • @SeanTalkoff
      @SeanTalkoff 10 днів тому

      Thanks, i did a quick web search and i found Sharon, i hope she responds to my mail.

  • @endofmidnight
    @endofmidnight 13 днів тому +13

    As an American my family will be tightening our purses and pocketing our wallets. Let the great collapse begin🤦🤦‍♂️

    • @JonathanHilierChannel
      @JonathanHilierChannel 7 днів тому

      People gave been saying the world is going to end for ever mate, relax. Remember india can fill the gap in supplying many products and diversification will be good thing in the long run.

    • @124085
      @124085 6 днів тому +1

      @@JonathanHilierChannel Lmao, India, what a dependable ally

    • @JonathanHilierChannel
      @JonathanHilierChannel 6 днів тому

      @@124085 It's about diversification, over reliance on country is dangerous.

  • @joelongardner1571
    @joelongardner1571 13 днів тому +222

    There are two main points that you're missing on why China does not want to provide stimulus to help support the economy.
    1. The CCP is afraid of inflation after bringing 800 million people out of poverty. If hundreds of millions of people in the countryside suddenly don't have enough money to eat, this could be a threat to their power.
    2. Corruption is still a large problem in China and if trillions of dollars worth of stimulus begins to flow, a significant amount of that money will be embezzled and laundered into western banks while certain officials disappear into western society.

    • @KamBar2020
      @KamBar2020 13 днів тому

      Slava TSMC 🇹🇼 Heroyam MediaTek 🦾

    • @LeonardTavast
      @LeonardTavast 13 днів тому

      China just announced a $1.4T stimulus to keep cities from going bancrupt. The CCP is trying to keep the property bubble from affecting other sectors of the economy.

    • @BIZKIT551
      @BIZKIT551 13 днів тому

      First of all 800 million people out of poverty is propaganda published by the CCP. People are still poor in a lot of places in China and all they did was lowering the income line below what these people were already earning to make it look like like the CCP lifted people out of poverty when in fact they made poor people even poorer. There is a reason why Chinese people are trying to move to HK or if they can, they try to escape to a place where they can earn a proper living.
      Second point is true and CCP as a whole is very very corrupt. Xi made himself president for life and thrown his opposition in jail or forced them to to join him.

    • @lagrangewei
      @lagrangewei 13 днів тому +32

      if this is true than China would not have made stimulus in 2008. the reality is China is just waiting for the right timing, it is pointless to do stimulus when US policy is unclear, how do you know where to invest in? so obiviously they are waiting to see what the gold is. as for million not having enough food, China has more than enough food surplus for months. China produces twice as much food as India does and they have the same population. food is just a bullshit narrative created by the west that only look at import data and doesn't understand alot of that is ending up as canned export. canned food that is easy for the government to stockpile and distribute too.

    • @AAAAAA-tj1nq
      @AAAAAA-tj1nq 13 днів тому +4

      joelongardner how are the americans enjoying chinese made blue crystal fent? rising inflation rate, rising fuel cost, american grocery stores have to lock up items to prevent shoplifiting and you can shoplift up to $950 without getting punished

  • @abbott75
    @abbott75 13 днів тому +303

    China will be fine, can the US economy survive though?

    • @rrni2343
      @rrni2343 13 днів тому

      They wont, they outsourced a lot of industry to china, over time this creates a skill deficiency in the US and skill accumulation in China. The US is left with useless nepo babies with MBAs running things.

    • @AndyMitch-ec5iy
      @AndyMitch-ec5iy 13 днів тому

      Check the economic data and see for yourself lol. You China bots are getting desperate these days.....

    • @uchuynguyen4763
      @uchuynguyen4763 13 днів тому +36

      I feel like the US economy is too big to fail at this point. More than half of all trade in the world in done through USD

    • @theo1170
      @theo1170 13 днів тому +20

      @@uchuynguyen4763 Which as a result of us stripping Russia of all of their USD because of their siege of Ukraine. Countries around the world are getting uncomfortable with that action and are looking for alternatives. Alternatives like just simply bartering, and using gold to make up the difference.

    • @AndyMitch-ec5iy
      @AndyMitch-ec5iy 13 днів тому +22

      @@uchuynguyen4763 It's closer to 80% with USD. It's a well oiled machine. Plus when you look at innovation - for example - it is booming with AI and way ahead of anybody else.
      The country is rich in talent and capital.

  • @eliahabib5111
    @eliahabib5111 13 днів тому +35

    When you do a video on USA China relations, you might want to use a world map with the Pacific Ocean in the middle. Instead of one with Europe and Africa in the middle.
    As a bonus you can actually put the arrows where the trade is done instead of the other side of the globe.

    • @azliaheaven
      @azliaheaven 13 днів тому +1

      yeah that would actually be more helpful

    • @d_all_in
      @d_all_in 13 днів тому +3

      Eurocentric channel can't help it 😂

    • @Banigoat
      @Banigoat 13 днів тому +1

      I thought of posting that as well, but I searched if anyone had written it before

  • @Seanroberts-q9o
    @Seanroberts-q9o 13 днів тому +37

    Better question can America economy survive trump

    • @SelfProclaimedEmperor
      @SelfProclaimedEmperor 13 днів тому +1

      It grew strongly last time under him

    • @lja996
      @lja996 13 днів тому +15

      ​@@SelfProclaimedEmperorNo it didn't. He wasted $8 trillion and caused inflation

    • @1Orderchaos
      @1Orderchaos 12 днів тому +5

      @@SelfProclaimedEmperor "A May 2019 analysis conducted by CNBC found Trump's tariffs are equivalent to one of the largest tax increases in the U.S. in decades. Studies have found that Trump's tariffs reduced real income in the United States, as well as adversely affecting U.S. GDP."

    • @NaSaSh1087
      @NaSaSh1087 10 днів тому

      @@1Orderchaosyes but his tax cuts were atleast 4x higher than his t@riffs. And that real income one was an estimate. But the real results showed a $5500 increase in real household income in just 3 years which is the literally highest since 1960s.

    • @NaSaSh1087
      @NaSaSh1087 10 днів тому

      @@lja996you do know that most of that $7.8 trillion is bipartisan c0vid spending right? Dem house literally approved it. I don’t fully support the aid spending but you’re intentionally omitting key context.
      And yes in his first 3 years there was real household income growth, gdp growth near 3%, low mortgage rates, low inflation and nearly 500k manufacturing jobs added in 3 years reversing the decades of manufacturing decline and largest poverty reduction since 1960s.
      He literally won because of the economic nostalgia Americans have for 2017-2019.

  • @kylebdun3077
    @kylebdun3077 13 днів тому +103

    US companies have already said they're passing the cost of tariffs to US consumers.

    • @NilsMueller
      @NilsMueller 13 днів тому +19

      But trump said he would bring prices back down!

    • @blondelp8451
      @blondelp8451 13 днів тому

      @@NilsMueller Trump said Mexico would pay for the walls. Which idiots still believe Trump?

    • @MrFastFarmer
      @MrFastFarmer 13 днів тому +2

      That’s the idea!! USA needs to start living within its means

    • @davidcrosthwaite
      @davidcrosthwaite 13 днів тому +25

      @@MrFastFarmerThe median American couldn’t even survive let alone live within their means

    • @MrFastFarmer
      @MrFastFarmer 13 днів тому +2

      @ which is why very hard times are coming. You can’t live on credit and money printing forever.

  • @N911GT2
    @N911GT2 13 днів тому +102

    @3:50 KIA is not Chinese...

    • @PacificDeep
      @PacificDeep 13 днів тому

      Yeah

    • @AEgir347
      @AEgir347 13 днів тому

      Doesn't matter, to a racist they're all asian.

    • @KamBar2020
      @KamBar2020 13 днів тому

      Slava TSMC 🇹🇼 Geroyam MediaTek 🦾

    • @Deoxsen
      @Deoxsen 13 днів тому +19

      No but it does have a manufacturing plant in China

    • @SeverusFelix
      @SeverusFelix 13 днів тому

      Yet

  • @satriojumeneng7055
    @satriojumeneng7055 13 днів тому +65

    Why are explanations about US-China trade imbalance never talking about the US companies that enjoyed so much profit?????

    • @merlin5662
      @merlin5662 13 днів тому +40

      considering they quote the heritage foundation as a source for this sort of show. that should give you your answer.

    • @oscarmccoy9102
      @oscarmccoy9102 13 днів тому

      @@merlin5662what’s the heritage foundation? sounds like a white supremacy group 😂.

    • @rod9829
      @rod9829 13 днів тому +2

      Higher return to capital than labour

    • @timmmahhhh
      @timmmahhhh 13 днів тому +3

      ​@@merlin5662oh criminy, thank you for noting that.

    • @KamBar2020
      @KamBar2020 13 днів тому +1

      Never Say NEVER 😎 Justin Bieber

  • @vinniechan
    @vinniechan 13 днів тому +173

    You also need to look.at other countries.that slap tariffs on Chijese good
    Indonesia slapped a 200% tariff on chinese clothing and texiles
    Even Russia is slapping tariffs as well

    • @stevenrafa1
      @stevenrafa1 13 днів тому +73

      Yesterday, Indonesia met with the Chinese president to discuss a tariff-free agreement and increased oil production, meaning Indonesia relies more on China than China does on Indonesia.

    • @serebii666
      @serebii666 13 днів тому +44

      @@stevenrafa1 If the talks are about increased oil Production, which Indonesia is a producer of, And China is an importer of, then it would mean China relies on Indonesia more, not to mention Chinese activity in Indonesian nickel mining and processing

    • @lamn3226
      @lamn3226 13 днів тому +16

      even after that Indonesia's textile industry this year is doing pretty bad. For example one of the oldest and biggest producer just went bankrupt some weeks ago. Some asks the government to bail them out or even nationalising it

    • @KamBar2020
      @KamBar2020 13 днів тому +2

      Slava TSMC 🇹🇼

    • @dragondescendant1
      @dragondescendant1 13 днів тому +6

      ​@@KamBar2020Taiwan provincial flag.

  • @JasonAtlas
    @JasonAtlas 13 днів тому +58

    I would not listen to the imf. If they are are ignoring their advice they can't be going that wrong.

    • @anaisanais4626
      @anaisanais4626 13 днів тому

      My country listened to them
      They screwed us over

    • @ZZWWYZ
      @ZZWWYZ 13 днів тому +8

      That's all I needed to know 😂 China gonna be alright

    • @christopherg2347
      @christopherg2347 13 днів тому +3

      "Don't listen to common sense."

    • @ryannathaniel9296
      @ryannathaniel9296 13 днів тому +13

      ​@@christopherg2347"Common sense" that cripples economies

    • @mep867
      @mep867 13 днів тому +9

      @@christopherg2347 The IMF is anything but common sense lol.

  • @Elijah-e6v
    @Elijah-e6v 8 днів тому +82

    Thank you for recommending Sarah Jennine Davis on one of your videos. I reached out to her and investing with her has been amazing.

    • @anilhettiarachci8467
      @anilhettiarachci8467 8 днів тому

      Wow, congratulations on your impressive investment success! Your discipline and focus on delayed gratification is truly inspiring. I'm curious, what are some of the key factors that you consider when making investment decisions? Do you have any tips for those of us who are just starting to dip our toes into the world of investing? Thanks for sharing your story!

    • @สมรักษ์อินทร์ตา-ม7ฑ
      @สมรักษ์อินทร์ตา-ม7ฑ 8 днів тому

      Do you mind sharing info on the adviser who
      assisted you? I'm 39 now and would love to
      grow my portfolio and plan my retirement

    • @Elijah-e6v
      @Elijah-e6v 8 днів тому

      @@สมรักษ์อินทร์ตา-ม7ฑ Sarah Jennine Davis is highly recommended
      You most likely should get her basic info when you search her on your browser.

    • @FreyaFreya3
      @FreyaFreya3 8 днів тому

      ​@@Elijah-e6vHow do I access her ? I really need this

    • @Elijah-e6v
      @Elijah-e6v 8 днів тому

      +156

  • @acenda-r2d2
    @acenda-r2d2 13 днів тому +3

    Wrong question. The correct question is: "Can USA's Economy Survive Trump 2.0?"

  • @Mooocheropordis
    @Mooocheropordis 13 днів тому +22

    Trump will hammer tariffs and end inflation. Like saying the sky can go under the sea.

    • @kenho-wr5ul2rh7m
      @kenho-wr5ul2rh7m 11 днів тому +1

      inflation will not leave but deteriorate as long as US keeps borrowings
      BRICS sees this problem and starts a new currency and payment system in order to reduce to rely on USD
      u borrow and create the inflation problem, u take the consequence, not by other nations

    • @reaperz5677
      @reaperz5677 6 днів тому

      @@kenho-wr5ul2rh7m So the U.S. has inflation because they borrow... in their own currency. And BRICS will supposedly solve the inflation problem by not using U.S. currency, and instead by borrowing... in their own currency.
      Yeah sorry but this is wishful thinking for people like you, that actually think BRICS means something. You can't just say "US INFLATION BECAUSE THEY BORROW FROM THEMSELVES" and then turn around and say "BRICS will have no inflation, because they will be borrowing from themselves! :)" without being laughed out of the room.

  • @V2RocketScientist
    @V2RocketScientist 9 днів тому +3

    When trump first added tariffs, most of my Chinese vendors told me they didn't care because America is only 10% of their business. Ultimately, stopping trade is a loss for the world. The American people can't possibly make all the goods coming from China's experienced population of 1.4 billion people. More tariffs are just an excuse for domestic manufacturers to jack up their prices and make higher profits. In the long run, it might drive more work into manufacturing, a gain for blue collar work but a loss for the most intelligent people. Perhaps, China will start taking over the most sophisicated work in the world which requires the brains that we do have, and we'll ultimately become poorer from losing that edge in the market.

    • @kimchiba4570
      @kimchiba4570 6 днів тому

      81 million magas and their leader fail to understand this simple fact

  • @77Arbiter77
    @77Arbiter77 13 днів тому +69

    The better question you should be asking is if the American economy can survive

    • @TheBrokensaintvxvx
      @TheBrokensaintvxvx 13 днів тому

      Point 1:
      The american economy is based on the dollar.
      Point2:
      The US dollar is the world reserve currency.
      Point 3:
      With all the leg work that's been getting done setting up other nations with the F-35 program in nations like Italy, Netherlands, Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Belgium, Israel, Japan, and soon, possibly Poland with billion dollar deals for the capacity to manufacture or just buy this plane its armaments, and its capacities.

    • @griegomas
      @griegomas 13 днів тому +10

      I mean, obviously yes. The sky is not falling.

    • @b1r2y3n
      @b1r2y3n 13 днів тому

      @@griegomasyet

    • @armandoventura9043
      @armandoventura9043 13 днів тому +4

      The economy can survive, although now it would be a good question whether be at the level of Brazil or Argentina

    • @griegomas
      @griegomas 13 днів тому +3

      @@armandoventura9043 hopefully not. If that does happen, the inevitable financial contagion will mean most of the rest of the world will be in even worse shape.

  • @MagarethWoods
    @MagarethWoods 12 днів тому +29

    Honestly our government has no idea how people are suffering these days. I much feel sorry for the disabled and homeless people who don't get the help they deserve, Investing in alternate income streams should be the top priority for everyone right now. especially given the global economic crisis we are currently experiencing. stocks, gold, silver, and virtual currencies are still attractive investments at the moment.

    • @NatalieDormer-or4jj
      @NatalieDormer-or4jj 12 днів тому +2

      Am looking for something to venture into on a short term basis, I really need to create an alternate source of income, what do you think I should be buying?

    • @MagarethWoods
      @MagarethWoods 12 днів тому +5

      Cryptocurrency/stock investment, but you will need a professional guide on that.

    • @MagarethWoods
      @MagarethWoods 12 днів тому +5

      Facebook 👇

    • @MagarethWoods
      @MagarethWoods 12 днів тому +5

      Evelyn C. Sanders

    • @NatalieDormer-or4jj
      @NatalieDormer-or4jj 12 днів тому +2

      Thank you so much for sharing 🙏

  • @anuragsinha2013
    @anuragsinha2013 7 днів тому +6

    Nice way to cope hard, wishing about someone else's failure rather than wishing for you own success.

  • @Evemeister12
    @Evemeister12 13 днів тому +41

    American protectionism worked so well in the 1920s.

    • @AlexP-dz7ew
      @AlexP-dz7ew 13 днів тому +11

      Yeah… when the global economy was less interconnected and the only way to travel between continents was by ship.
      Using concepts that half worked 100+ years ago is DEFINITELY going to work now…
      Do you know what happened in 1929?

    • @seanthe100
      @seanthe100 13 днів тому

      So well that the US is still the dominant country of all of our lifetimes even 100 years later

    • @jontalbot1
      @jontalbot1 13 днів тому +18

      @@AlexP-dz7ew You don’t understand irony do you?

    • @gtwucla
      @gtwucla 12 днів тому +1

      @@jontalbot1 Could be wrong but I don't think they were disagreeing, seems like they were just elaborating?

    • @TopShot501st
      @TopShot501st 11 днів тому

      Yes, roaring 20's were a thing. Then black Friday happened in 29 ended it. Boom bust is the way of the world in capitalism.

  • @WHR0306
    @WHR0306 12 днів тому +26

    I am American and I will be honest in that I did not vote for Trump, however, here is my perspective.
    We Americans only make up 5% of the world population. We might have the largest economy right now and we may be a pop-culture powerhouse, but we will not be these things if we abandon our allies and cut ties with China. Our economy is built off of the world economy, and we need to get along to a certain extent to stay wealthy as a nation.
    If I were a European nation right now that's about to get slapped with tariffs, I'd cut ties with America and simply start trading more with the East.

    • @TheRealBruceLouis
      @TheRealBruceLouis 12 днів тому +2

      america was once an omega pop culture powerhouse, but they no longer have the same statue as they once did before as well. they are still a pop culture powerhouse, but japan, korea and even china are really slowly creeping up in terms of world pop culture power.

    • @gtwucla
      @gtwucla 12 днів тому

      Europe has the same issues with the "east." They're talking about tariffs over EVs and Germany is functionally screwed because they're sales in China are tanking due to local competition and overreliance on inputs and outputs from Russia and China. Cutting ties with the US would be economic suicide. Like it or not, things are going to be fundamentally changed with Trump's presidency but the world will essentially be held hostage for four years while the US goes through Trump's presidency but the world will essentially be held hostage for four years while the US goes through whatever Trump's going to put them through. If his administration sticks with the plans and cuts a ton of gov workers, deports mass amounts of people, dissolves the department of education, and raises tariffs, essentially torpedoing the economy by taking manual workers out, taking money via gov workers salaries, raising prices and therefore inflation, and essentially putting a cap on talent by cutting education, hopefully it gets so bad, Americans learn the meaning of consequence when it comes to politics. Maybe it'll hold us over for a couple decades and helps us long term. That's the optimistic take anyway.

    • @buddermonger2000
      @buddermonger2000 11 днів тому +3

      This is woefully inaccurate.
      First off: America has VERY few ties to the world economy. It has a trade to GDP ratio of 27%. The GLOBAL average is 63%, for Europe it's somewhere closer to 80% or 90%. Iran has a ratio of 51%. Over half of American foreign trade is within NAFTA. The only country with a lower ratio is Sudan at 2%.
      Secondly, for the European market, China is still a threat given that it is still a power with expansionary ambitions, is anti-democratic, and is actively oppressing its population, all values antithetical to Europe.
      Thirdly, America has 5% world population but has 25% of the global economy. Still more than China, who is also actively trying to steal intellectual property in order to put you put of business and take over your market.
      There's no version of this which looks good to trade with China besides short term finances. If you're into training up your competition and trying to become politically and economically dependent, that's how you do that.

    • @WHR0306
      @WHR0306 10 днів тому

      @@buddermonger2000 Yes we do have a large GDP because we get along with others. Like I said, we don't want to be cocky and ruin it.
      As for Europe, counties like Germany and France have already begun trading more and more with China. Don't be ignorant.

    • @buddermonger2000
      @buddermonger2000 10 днів тому

      @WHR0306 Having the second lowest trade to GDP ratio in the world is not from playing nice with others, lol.
      Also, yeah, I know France and Germany already trade more with China. I just think they're stupid for doing it due to the reasons outlined above. They hate Russia, and they're trading with mega Russia.

  • @Goodkiwibloke
    @Goodkiwibloke 13 днів тому +95

    China will be just fine. Tariffs affect citizens of the importing country. Its not like US can switch from Chinese manufacturers to others, because the whole world has outsourced manufacturing to China over the past 20 years
    China is likely to make business difficult for US companies, through "shortages" and "delays" of critical materials

    • @sparks1792
      @sparks1792 13 днів тому +34

      It hurts both lmao. I know you guys hate trump but be serious

    • @TheBrokensaintvxvx
      @TheBrokensaintvxvx 13 днів тому +1

      Those delays will be because of Chinese goods importers not being able to afford the difference in cost, because the free market will have a 60% tax on goods imported from china.

    • @dalekrenegade2596
      @dalekrenegade2596 13 днів тому

      ​@@sparks1792
      Farmers needed billions in tax payer dollars to be bailed out because Trump's last tariff stunt. We didn't see any benefit while China just shrugged their shoulders.

    • @QALibrary
      @QALibrary 13 днів тому

      In the past under Trump, they stopped taking any orders or any contacts for soya beans and figures showed over 1% of USA farmland went bust (other farmers were brought up via shell companies when it became political (esp when farmers retired and sold up due to the links to tariffs) in turn people linked to the Chinese state took over the farmland in the USA.
      And you are totally correct as in raw supplies of materials like rare earth material - oh yes my USA that is a 200% price rise for you and you get in in a year or so maybe!

    • @vladthecon
      @vladthecon 13 днів тому +3

      it might hurt the US short term but the tariffs will convince some manufacturers to build factories in america even if it hurts our finances it is better to be less reliant on a rival for basic supplies

  • @GamerKnight-os1ot
    @GamerKnight-os1ot 12 днів тому +11

    "But if we don't use Chinese sweatshop labour, and instead use american workers paying a liveable wage, American consumers will pay more!"
    Good!

    • @RagafragaMuffin
      @RagafragaMuffin 12 днів тому +3

      I agree with you in prospect. Ironically the workers will end up seeing a slight wage bump while the managers and board members rake in all the bonuses and stock lol. In the end the American consumer is paying for the rich to get richer. Unemployment isn’t an issue anymore, the wages are. The slots are already filled, everyone is just underpaid. The wrong people will see our money because they control when and how the raises are distributed. Naturally they keep more for themselves.

    • @NotASpecies
      @NotASpecies 12 днів тому +6

      sir livable wages in America is a joke lol. Trump wont raise the minimum wage thus with prices raising due to tariffs, the American worker falls behind resulting in more wage income disparity.

    • @NotASpecies
      @NotASpecies 12 днів тому +1

      @@RagafragaMuffin This would only occur if inflation rises justifying to corporations a bump in wages. I mean unions can strike but considering Trump stated that companies should be allowed to fire Union workers who strike for long periods of times I doubt that any real effort would be made to raise wages for Americans.
      I mean my mom has only received a 2% increase in her wages even with the 9% inflation and she makes around 30,000 per year which is way under the median income [all though my dad makes way more than her so I'm not struggling] but still, if her and my dad had divorced she'd be making under the poverty line because she works in education.
      Corporations will not rise wages unless they see a reasoning to do it, and even then the reasoning will only see a 1-3% bump in wages.

    • @jwhite5008
      @jwhite5008 12 днів тому

      @@RagafragaMuffin True. The workers' wages will increase a little. Prices will increase a lot.

    • @SimonSays-g6o
      @SimonSays-g6o 12 днів тому

      The us doesn't have the infrastructure anymore to simply start making everything internally again.
      Factories and that experience has been moving to China for 40 years
      To move it all back is gonna take decades

  • @bruce4947
    @bruce4947 13 днів тому +74

    LMAO. Tariffs will do more harm to the importing country. Economics 101.

    • @maritaschweizer1117
      @maritaschweizer1117 13 днів тому +5

      Adam Smith wrote this already 200 years ago.

    • @GabibboReall
      @GabibboReall 13 днів тому +17

      Economics 101. Autarky is better than dependency on a hostile country. (the oil industry has showed that lmao)

    • @googane7755
      @googane7755 13 днів тому

      ​​​​@@GabibboReallNo advanced economy has ever produced everything by themselves, it's simply impossible.

    • @ShadowPhoenixMaximus
      @ShadowPhoenixMaximus 13 днів тому

      Unlike the CCP with its 1/2/3/x child policy and then quick reversal. The West does plan ahead. Why would we want Chinese products that are specifically designed to destroy local businesses - via free state sponsored shipping and low prison labour manufacturing costs?
      The sooner Temu, Shein, etc companies are banned from Westerner markets the better.

    • @1Orderchaos
      @1Orderchaos 12 днів тому +1

      @@GabibboReall That is impossible. No country has everything to be self sufficient. Not even America.

  • @thelammas8283
    @thelammas8283 6 днів тому +2

    It will do some damage, but to the US.

  • @Insightful21
    @Insightful21 13 днів тому +59

    Countries with a services based economy will survive these tariffs better than their industrial counterparts.

    • @makotosaito9067
      @makotosaito9067 13 днів тому +11

      That depends a lot. Most of the times the countries that better survive a trade war are those that are self-sufficient on their primary needs, both services but also food, energy and consumer goods. As a primary example of that, the main loser of a China-US trade war is Japan, since it's not self-sufficient in almost anything its economy and people need to work normally, so it's going to suffer from the price increases from both sides.

    • @TurielD
      @TurielD 13 днів тому +5

      Wat - you think we'll be selling a lot of services to the people wrecking their own economy do you?

    • @Insightful21
      @Insightful21 13 днів тому

      @@TurielD The services at least for the UK have a largely plastic demand that I doubt will be affected by tariffs on goods.

    • @kenho-wr5ul2rh7m
      @kenho-wr5ul2rh7m 11 днів тому

      People probably forget China's trading surplus with US sharply increase after Trump's trade war in 2018
      You the American are assuming urselves too big, US-China trade only accounts for 16% of China trading capacity, China is trading 84% of its capacity with the world other than US
      In another word, u are only with 16% importance to China

  • @Kwippy
    @Kwippy 12 днів тому +4

    There's never a winner in a trade war.

    • @marvinh3357
      @marvinh3357 8 днів тому

      yesn't - china could be the winner. If the us industry starts collapsing many countries will have a new go to country, china. If done wrong, china might simply take your no 1 spot within the next 4 years. And never forget, trump made a casino go bankrupt - and he is now the guy making your countries financial future.

    • @Foquro
      @Foquro 6 днів тому

      Mexico and South Asian countries: 😁

  • @Kwippy
    @Kwippy 12 днів тому +16

    In recent years I have bought Chinese made refrigerator, air conditioners, TV, electric shower, not to mention numerous other lower value goods. Why? Because they are cheap and amazingly, they are good! The days of Chinese goods being laughably inferior are long gone.

    • @DarkArcticTV
      @DarkArcticTV 10 днів тому +1

      Bot

    • @Raiz3l123
      @Raiz3l123 10 днів тому +1

      ​@@DarkArcticTV not bot he is saying true partially but not all Chinese products are long lasting and reliable like he said

    • @cashflownpv
      @cashflownpv 9 днів тому +1

      @@Raiz3l123 You get what you pay for. You want awesome HQ Chinese goods you'll have to pay more-just simple common sense

    • @Raiz3l123
      @Raiz3l123 9 днів тому +2

      @@cashflownpv umm yes bro i agree but sometimes high paying Chinese products shocks 😂😂😅👍

    • @kimchiba4570
      @kimchiba4570 6 днів тому +1

      ​@@DarkArcticTVlol.... What a childish knee jerk reply to anything that goes against your own brainwashed biased views ... Still stuck at 7 year old , mentally ?

  • @andreweaston1779
    @andreweaston1779 13 днів тому +14

    $5 or $10 T-shirts made overseas are produced for around $45 in the US. It is the same type of story for so many of those types of products.
    Those jobs are NEVER coming back.

    • @Howdy1957
      @Howdy1957 13 днів тому +1

      Labor costs

    • @kenho-wr5ul2rh7m
      @kenho-wr5ul2rh7m 11 днів тому

      @@Howdy1957 Trade war has some long term and big consequence
      Trade war against European car in 1960s-1970s caused the rise of Japanese car globabaly in 1970s
      Job outsourcing in US started from 1980s, because of Ronald Reagan's trade war against Japanese car, and this consequence still last till these days, US still outsources jobs in 2020s
      Great Depression in 1929 started because of the trade war against Europe from ~1927-1929

    • @Cherry-pu4mx
      @Cherry-pu4mx 7 днів тому

      Why are you defending a $5 shirt?

    • @kenho-wr5ul2rh7m
      @kenho-wr5ul2rh7m 7 днів тому

      @@Cherry-pu4mx im buying the same quality at $5 instead of $45

    • @Cherry-pu4mx
      @Cherry-pu4mx 7 днів тому

      @@kenho-wr5ul2rh7m lol no. You are out of your mind if you think chinese crap is the same quality.

  • @MaximilianoAedo
    @MaximilianoAedo 13 днів тому +4

    Donald Trump isn't really the brightest guy on Earth.

  • @lie01234
    @lie01234 6 днів тому +1

    When are we going to get a "Will China Man up and Cripple the US Economy?"

  • @chengkuoklee5734
    @chengkuoklee5734 13 днів тому +16

    Dude, Cuba still alive. Question is how painful will Americans get?

    • @dalekrenegade2596
      @dalekrenegade2596 13 днів тому +3

      They complain about grocery prices now wait until the prices if EVERYTHING just skyrocket.

    • @NoUsername-470
      @NoUsername-470 13 днів тому +2

      @@dalekrenegade2596Dude the US is a food exporter.

    • @seanthe100
      @seanthe100 13 днів тому +2

      ​@@dalekrenegade2596most essentials are made in the US. 😂😂😂 US largest food exporter, the US the largest oil and gas producer by far.

    • @dalekrenegade2596
      @dalekrenegade2596 13 днів тому +1

      @@seanthe100
      Using parts from other countries. Where do you think microchips or Trump merchandise comes from?

    • @dalekrenegade2596
      @dalekrenegade2596 13 днів тому

      @@NoUsername-470
      Then why billions of dollars worth tax dollars needed to bail out farmers during Trump's last tariff war?

  • @TheFourFats
    @TheFourFats 12 днів тому +3

    A blanket tariff wont work, but it’s interesting to watch them try. There’s a reason certain countries manufacture things. It’s cheaper and more efficient.
    It frees up the importing countries to do more high tech, high value production instead.
    Good luck to the consumer facing higher prices on their microwaves, shoes and practically everything because the supply chain is inevitably globalised.
    Trump will be gone in 4 years, is there any guarantee these tariffs will remain in place for 5, 8, 12 years afterwards?
    Business owners aren’t going to take the risk

  • @FernanPer94
    @FernanPer94 13 днів тому +24

    This could encourage other communist or authoritarian-leaning countries, like Cambodia, Vietnam, or Laos, to boost production, potentially positioning them to become U.S. rivals again once they gain power.

    • @seadkolasinac7220
      @seadkolasinac7220 13 днів тому +1

      Become enemies with the US while being desperate to access its consumer market? How does that work?

    • @ChillingKong
      @ChillingKong 13 днів тому +4

      They are too small enough to against the U.S.

    • @CountArtha
      @CountArtha 13 днів тому

      LOL

    • @darcylauren1934
      @darcylauren1934 13 днів тому

      @@ChillingKong More likely they'd rather have a broken China that they can steal territory from and expand their communist or authoritarian-leaning countries...

    • @emie9858
      @emie9858 12 днів тому +3

      >communist countries
      >Cambodia, Vietnam, and Laos
      You really have no idea what that means do you

  • @pandaphil
    @pandaphil 4 дні тому

    Remember all the people who whined that we can't possibly raise the minimum wage because companies would pass the costs on to consumers? Same thing.

  • @konman181
    @konman181 12 днів тому +11

    Dude. OUR economy can't survive trump 😂

  • @SpazzyMcGee1337
    @SpazzyMcGee1337 12 днів тому +2

    Who is going to build all the stuff in American factories? America already has high employment.

    • @OK-hl6qd
      @OK-hl6qd 11 днів тому

      In non existent factories

    • @reaperz5677
      @reaperz5677 6 днів тому

      @@OK-hl6qd Are you this dumb to believe propaganda that the U.S. doesn't have any factories? At all?
      Really? You think the world's largest manufacturing country doesn't have ANY factories? Ok...

  • @educacionespecialchannel3756
    @educacionespecialchannel3756 13 днів тому +24

    Wazzzup Beijing room 6:26

  • @daniyalamed2960
    @daniyalamed2960 8 днів тому +2

    My question is whether the US economy can survive Trump. That is a better question to ask

  • @fmitsinc9146
    @fmitsinc9146 13 днів тому +12

    Importers will prefer to pay the tariffs rather than move the manufacturing to the US. After all it costs more to produce in the states, so what's the point of risking large amount of investments to end in the same place

    • @azliaheaven
      @azliaheaven 13 днів тому

      the loss in profit is to high to just pay the tariffs

    • @fmitsinc9146
      @fmitsinc9146 13 днів тому +5

      @azliaheaven
      They'll have to raise the prices either way. As I mentioned, producing in the states costs more because of wages and regulations.

    • @oluwaseyijohnson2319
      @oluwaseyijohnson2319 13 днів тому

      So instead of exploiting chinese workers, we can provide Americans with jobs

    • @ShadowPhoenixMaximus
      @ShadowPhoenixMaximus 13 днів тому

      Manufacturers are already leaving China and have been for years. This is just another incentive to drive the last few remaining companies that believe CCP controlled China is the future out of the country.

    • @S3Cs4uN8
      @S3Cs4uN8 13 днів тому +1

      @@azliaheaven Even then they would likely move to someplace like India, Bangladesh or Vietnam where their costs would be lower, and that's only if the expense of committing to such a move would be sufficiently less than what they would have to put up with by just eating the tariffs and raising prices.

  • @mwxfl-q9h
    @mwxfl-q9h 11 днів тому +1

    One data can overturn the entire article: China's exports to developing countries have exceeded those of developed countries.
    This means that the market in developed countries is no longer the most important, and it also means that developed countries’ willingness to buy is greater than China’s willingness to sell.
    SO, no matter how much tariff you add, it does not affect the overall situation

  • @richardlabeja
    @richardlabeja 13 днів тому +13

    China's advantage is they have a long term strategy spanning decades, whereas western countries have very short term strategies. China is still the Top Trading Partner to more than 120 countries.

    • @sonneh86
      @sonneh86 13 днів тому

      That's such a dumb myth. If the Chinese really plan while thinking far into the future they would have never had that catastrophic one China policy

    • @dean_l33
      @dean_l33 13 днів тому +4

      It's dumb to assume they have decades long plot. They're human not some alien but also that doesn't mean they don't have some kind of plot going

    • @attackxxx
      @attackxxx 13 днів тому

      Yea 3 year lockdown was an excellent long term strategy.

    • @alburaq3290
      @alburaq3290 13 днів тому +1

      CCP ruined any long term potential of China with their one child policy.
      Their demographics are in the gutter. Turns out Chinese also plan short term.

    • @thedevguy4272
      @thedevguy4272 12 днів тому

      @@dean_l33You don’t need to be alien to have plans for decades. The communists can plan like that because they have authoritarian rule. But the downside is that they’re slow to respond to change, and these systems fail eventually.

  • @victorconway444
    @victorconway444 11 днів тому +1

    Yes it will. The real question is if America will survive it.

  • @youcantata
    @youcantata 13 днів тому +10

    Exports as % of GDP in China was about 20 % in 2023. And export to the USA is 17% of total export of China. So even if US totally bans all imports from China, it amounts only 4% of GDP of China at most. China will suffer, yes. But not so catastrophic to Chinese economy. 4% of GDP worths only 1 year of Chinese GDP growth. So China will overcome the economic shock from US import ban or tariff within 1-2 years.

    • @maritaschweizer1117
      @maritaschweizer1117 13 днів тому

      Yes. The question is how strong the USA will suffer. GOLDMAN-Sachs calculated a decline of GDP by 8.9% if Trump realize his plan. This is a twice as bad recesin in the USA than in 2008.

    • @NoUsername-470
      @NoUsername-470 13 днів тому

      According to the numbers of the Chinese government? Not too sure that’s the most reliable, after all there was somewhat, 100 million nonexistent people they counted?

    • @ShadowPhoenixMaximus
      @ShadowPhoenixMaximus 13 днів тому

      To who exactly? Where else can the CCP dump their tofu dreg products where they aren't already dumping them?
      Chinese people aren't buying enough Chinese products to make the country self-sufficient, so they're relying on foreign exports to prop up their economy. If even Chinese people don't want what the CCP is selling, why should anyone else?

    • @johnsullivan8673
      @johnsullivan8673 12 днів тому +1

      @@ShadowPhoenixMaximus you got tofu brain

    • @cool_things_collection
      @cool_things_collection 7 днів тому

      @@ShadowPhoenixMaximus Wake up from your dream and see the world, bro

  • @dalefutrelle1441
    @dalefutrelle1441 11 днів тому +2

    Sounds like this will delay a lot of retirements for Americans... smh

    • @freetorobandloot
      @freetorobandloot 11 днів тому

      I was hoping to retire soon but I guess I will need to wait. Will definitely won't be able to retire in the usa. cost of living is too high, unless I move to sh!thole states like Alabama, Louisiana, mississippi, etc...

  • @OldManBryan
    @OldManBryan 13 днів тому +5

    If I was an english teacher I’d give you an F at this point for how often you overuse the word “crisis.”

  • @kimandre336
    @kimandre336 12 днів тому +2

    And America's manufacturing capacity is failing horribly. America's tariffs only make sense when the federal government is willing to recover its manufacturing sector. So far, it's turning worse.

    • @Akapaco2
      @Akapaco2 11 днів тому +2

      US manufacturing has actually been steadily increasing for the past decade. The US is currently the 2nd largest manufacturer on Earth, second only to China.
      It's just that automation has replaced many of the traditional factory jobs. So while the number of workers has decreased, the manufacturing capacity has increased.
      With all that being said, I still think that the Tarriffs are a terrible idea, that will just lead to more inflation. If our government wants us less dependent on other countries, there are better ways to do it.

    • @whitemaleoprah
      @whitemaleoprah 10 днів тому

      Which building back manufacturing is one of Trump’s biggest deals

    • @Cherry-pu4mx
      @Cherry-pu4mx 7 днів тому

      Lol manufacturing capacity is not the issue. The usa is better than china at manufacturing. No debate there. The issue is automaton

  • @gweejiahan9336
    @gweejiahan9336 13 днів тому +21

    CHINA exports to USA makes up only 2.4% of their GDP. So Im pretty sure they will be fine.

    • @gingee-f3v
      @gingee-f3v 13 днів тому +1

      Not fine😢no job no income no dignity here

    • @thedevguy4272
      @thedevguy4272 12 днів тому

      It depends on if you believe their GDP figures, which I do not. But the truth is that you’re right it won’t substantially harm China until we get other countries to stop trading with them too.

    • @lordpeanut3245
      @lordpeanut3245 12 днів тому

      I agree with that, but honestly there is no way in hell trump would be ever able "convince" enough of the global economy to stop trading with China.

    • @zeflute4586
      @zeflute4586 7 днів тому

      @@thedevguy4272 omg... stop all these "i dont believe their GDP figures" ignorance already🙄.

    • @hughmungus2760
      @hughmungus2760 7 днів тому

      @@thedevguy4272 now why would other countries do that? China is the number 1 trading partner for most countries in the world.

  • @Bytional
    @Bytional 12 днів тому +1

    In reality, even you put 200% tariff on Chinese goods, the 1st thing you need to make sure is US can replace that goods with something cheaper than 200% tariffs Chinese one, the problem with US right now is they can't make something cheap enough for the American people.

  • @andrewstevens9481
    @andrewstevens9481 13 днів тому +6

    For all the complaints about Trump his China tariffs and general unease about the trade imbalance was one big bright spot.

  • @javaman7199
    @javaman7199 13 днів тому +1

    I am more concerned about the damage he is going to do to the American economy.

  • @louisjefferies2733
    @louisjefferies2733 13 днів тому +35

    But can America's economy survive Trump 2.0

    • @landenjones9374
      @landenjones9374 13 днів тому

      Bro the whole point of the tariffs are trumps attempt to bring manufacturing back to America (aka create more job's and make the US more self reliant) and cut income taxes that's really not a bad idea and many president's have been trying to do this for year's,
      just none have been this extreme about it.
      Not to mention trump also wants tap into our own oil supply so we don't have to buy it from others and rely on imports (and he also even wants to export some of our own oil to an extent)
      Trumps also talked multiple times about investing into renewable nuclear energy systems (this will reduce the price of electricity btw.)
      And trump also wants to deport illegal immigrants who steal jobs and leach off of welfare/taxpayer dollars.
      And he wants to cut military funding to Ukraine (which we've given hundreds of billions of dollars under the biden Harris administration btw.)
      Among a few other thing's.
      Even if he doesn't have the greatest economic plan it's 10× better than Kamala Harris's economic plan LMAO.

    • @ThwipThwipBoom
      @ThwipThwipBoom 13 днів тому +11

      We already did once for 4 years and things went fine. People are being over dramatic about Trump.

    • @krashme997
      @krashme997 13 днів тому +5

      @@ThwipThwipBoom His policies weren't half as extreme as back in 2016

    • @landenjones9374
      @landenjones9374 13 днів тому

      @@louisjefferies2733 Bro the whole point of the tariffs are trumps attempt to bring manufacturing back to America (aka create more job's and make the US more self reliant) and cut income taxes that's really not a bad idea and many president's have been trying to do this for year's,
      just none have been this extreme about it.
      Not to mention trump also wants tap into our own oil supply so we don't have to buy it from others and rely on imports (and he also even wants to export some of our own oil to an extent)
      Trumps also talked multiple times about investing into renewable nuclear energy systems (this will reduce the price of electricity btw.)
      And trump also wants to deport illegal immigrants who steal jobs and leach off of welfare/taxpayer dollars.
      And he wants to cut military funding to Ukraine (which we've given hundreds of billions of dollars under the biden Harris administration btw.)
      Among a few other thing's.
      Even if he doesn't have the greatest economic plan it's 10× better than Kamala Harris's economic plan LMAO.

    • @ThwipThwipBoom
      @ThwipThwipBoom 13 днів тому +1

      @@krashme997 That's a straight lie. You liberals lost the election because you can't stop lying.

  • @PipinoExcalibur
    @PipinoExcalibur 12 днів тому +2

    its not ccp but cpc

  • @nez_ic
    @nez_ic 13 днів тому +3

    God I hope not

  • @pennyshi6474
    @pennyshi6474 7 днів тому

    This is a marathon, way longer than 4 years.

  • @MarktYertd
    @MarktYertd 13 днів тому +17

    Perhaps China becomes a bit more isolated, but since they make everything except chips and have local companies, they may be able to survive in the future.

    • @shafsteryellow
      @shafsteryellow 13 днів тому +11

      Isolated 😂

    • @jeremybiggs8413
      @jeremybiggs8413 13 днів тому +3

      They don’t have a consumer economy and all attempts to make one have failed. They need American consumers to keep their economy afloat.

    • @Nightwing6427
      @Nightwing6427 13 днів тому +4

      @@shafsteryellow what happens when someone gets isolated in western propaganda bubble

    • @pierren___
      @pierren___ 13 днів тому +1

      ​@@jeremybiggs8413 they have their own citizens lmao. They would do as well without usa

    • @kv4648
      @kv4648 13 днів тому +2

      The reason they're trying to export is to soften the recession they're going through

  • @robertbucks1721
    @robertbucks1721 8 днів тому +2

    Naive, Why American people spend money on Chinese goods? It is because American people short of money to be patriotic to buy expensive American goods. Uncle Sam raise tariff wont lead to patriotic American get more money, as a result, American people are still poor to spend on American goods.

    • @zacksmith5644
      @zacksmith5644 8 днів тому

      Also more tariffs mean dollar becomes unaffordable

  • @DJYStarTV
    @DJYStarTV 13 днів тому +9

    The Chinese market is the only one that is really growing, I think China will be happy having its domestic market for itself.

    • @GC__99__99
      @GC__99__99 13 днів тому +1

      It's had its own isolated market since covid and it hasn't been doing well (like the rest of the world). The undervalued currency makes their goods cheap for other countries, but not for the salaries of their own workers to afford the very things they're making. Also it's not true that it's the only market that's growing, just Google "countries with gdp growth 2024"

    • @crosslink1493
      @crosslink1493 12 днів тому

      If you believe the data the CCP publishes. Look at foreign analyst's outlooks on China for the last few years and they are either flat or negative on Chinese markets. Most I see rate China as too risky for investment right now.

  • @code_play_channel
    @code_play_channel 12 днів тому +1

    Nothing like economic advise from... the UK :/ lol

  • @jeffmorris5802
    @jeffmorris5802 13 днів тому +12

    This was remarkably neutral. Well done TL;DR. It would have been very easy to veer into partisan opinions on this topic.

  • @ValhalQcoholic
    @ValhalQcoholic 12 днів тому +1

    The part at 5:08 is literally leftist meme. "Any day now, the Chinese economy will collapse!" Hasn't happened yet. Meanwhile we get a a depression every 6.5 years.

  • @OperationAndrewDocumentaries
    @OperationAndrewDocumentaries 13 днів тому +5

    China tariffs kind of make some sense. Starting a trade war with the rest of the world...
    Less logical.
    Expect inflation and less choice of products.
    Also expect American business that import raw materials to suffer.

    • @OperationAndrewDocumentaries
      @OperationAndrewDocumentaries 13 днів тому +1

      American businesses that depend on exporting are also likely to face tarrifs coming back their way.
      Which is like ramping up taxes on your own businesses but not getting any money for it

    • @MrFastFarmer
      @MrFastFarmer 13 днів тому

      I’m shocked how many people don’t understand the strategy. It’s not about trade wars, it about withdrawing from globalisation

    • @dalekrenegade2596
      @dalekrenegade2596 13 днів тому

      @MrFastFarmer
      There is no strategy, just an idiot going off vibes.

  • @andrelanyak2131
    @andrelanyak2131 10 днів тому +1

    3:37 "Tariffs doesn't work"
    Graph showing its drop😀, so which one is it?

    • @reaperz5677
      @reaperz5677 6 днів тому

      Do... you understand how graphs work? And when U.S. presidents take office?
      Trump took office in 2017, he was only elected in 2016. China's surplus was dropping during Obama-era, as evident by 2015/2016, and started rising... in Trump-era America, during 2019/2020.
      So yeah, tariffs don't work, the graph clearly shows there's no correlation to U.S. tariffs on China with their surplus. Pay attention is school next time.

  • @jordisaura6748
    @jordisaura6748 13 днів тому +8

    When everyone is part of BRICS, what do USA's tariffs mather?

    • @RCXDerp
      @RCXDerp 13 днів тому

      Nobody wants to partner with Russia and India is disputing their border with China. Brics won't happen.

    • @WinterXR7
      @WinterXR7 13 днів тому +2

      Their chinas biggest trading partner.

    • @ricardomadleno564
      @ricardomadleno564 13 днів тому

      I do t think you understand what tariffs means. Also the biggest economies in the world are already in the G7 and the G20 which btw includes China as well…

    • @jaegar2004
      @jaegar2004 13 днів тому +5

      The brics is not a real alliance lol😂! There are more conflicts than trade agreements inside! Just few examples: 1. egypt vs ethiopia. 2.saudi arabia and uae vs iran 3. India vs china. India and brazil even rejected belt and road initiative! What a bunch of looosers😂😂😂!!

    • @Abhinav-m4o
      @Abhinav-m4o 13 днів тому

      ​@@jaegar2004but they're sovereign unlike US vassals
      Surely india and China has tension
      But that doesn't prevent them from brics summit and border disengagement

  • @tanaka5395
    @tanaka5395 13 днів тому +1

    The tariffs are not there to stop consumers buying chinese products, they are their to force companies to move manufacturing operations out of China.

    • @freetorobandloot
      @freetorobandloot 11 днів тому

      He tried that in the first term. That didn't work because the supply chain is still heavily depended on China. I doubt it will work this time around either.

    • @cool_things_collection
      @cool_things_collection 7 днів тому

      China is more focused on expanding its market to a broader range of countries. There are 8 billion people worldwide, a market far larger than the US. The US market represents only a very small portion of its global trade.

    • @reaperz5677
      @reaperz5677 6 днів тому

      @@cool_things_collection Yet the U.S. market (besides the E.U. market) is the biggest, high-income, developed consumer market there is.
      You can say that it "represents only a very small portion of global trade" all you want, the truth is that Americans are still the largest market, because they can actually afford everything the Chinese/any other country is offering them. Every other country is either not as big as the U.S., or too underdeveloped to afford anything China would try selling. There isn't "much" to expand to for China. Expanding into rural Ethiopia where people can barely afford electricity isn't a replacement for American consumers lol.
      So yeah you're incorrect, basically.

  • @Finnestdude221
    @Finnestdude221 13 днів тому +12

    Probably yeah

  • @caughtinprovidence7197
    @caughtinprovidence7197 12 днів тому +2

    the title should be " Can America really dare to take on China "

  • @wiktorjachyra1869
    @wiktorjachyra1869 13 днів тому +12

    Ah yes, instead of American companies being competitive let’s tariff the competition and force people to buy the more expensive American products

    • @nhjhbmkuy7173
      @nhjhbmkuy7173 13 днів тому +4

      Which will likely remain less competitive as imports of raw materials become more expensive

    • @CountArtha
      @CountArtha 13 днів тому +1

      American companies will be more competitive as he relaxes regulations, reduces corporate tax, and the U.S. produces more energy.

    • @nhjhbmkuy7173
      @nhjhbmkuy7173 13 днів тому

      @@CountArtha small hole in your theory with all the certain retaliatory tariffs certain to be placed on the US we won’t be producing anywhere near the amount of energy we are now since who would buy it? And corporate taxes are already next to nothing and what further regulations? At this point rivers may start catching fire again

    • @VICTOR-vf8yx
      @VICTOR-vf8yx 12 днів тому +5

      ​@CountArtha
      Problem is that large American companies are inherently never competitive and do not try to be. Rather they are primarily oriented around profit maximization far above any reasonable amount
      e.g. insulin, recent American cars, etc.
      This prevents innovation as it does not create an inherent necessity.

    • @wiktorjachyra1869
      @wiktorjachyra1869 12 днів тому

      @ yeah I just watched a mini doc last night about how American cars are so unaffordable because they shifted their priority to profit and higher margins over higher volume

  • @iscoperezavalos
    @iscoperezavalos 13 днів тому +2

    This channel usually has good information, but you can see the biases. Unfortunately, my expert opinion, China's economy will soon take over the US economy. The tariffs will do little.

  • @bryan0359
    @bryan0359 10 днів тому +26

    I'm glad I was introduced to forex trading and got the best teacher and mentor who helped me understand the financial market I'm grateful to Mrs Liam🙏

    • @giselastefan2180
      @giselastefan2180 10 днів тому

      I am from Miami United State🇺🇸, The difference Mrs Lucy Mary Liam makes in my life is second to none it's definitely a life changing kindness. I really appreciate her effort in my life.

    • @emilymccord7063
      @emilymccord7063 10 днів тому

      I invested $2,000 and the trade in one month making close to $20,000. I wonder where she got her analysis.

    • @Leahwilliamson124
      @Leahwilliamson124 10 днів тому

      Seeing my broker talked on UA-cam, This was exactly how I got the recommendation about her for the past years. Hit $200k today. Thank you for all the knowledge and nuggets you had thrown my way over the last months. Started with $20k in July 2024

    • @carlosalberto54754
      @carlosalberto54754 10 днів тому

      I'm from Brazil 🇧🇷 I and two other of my friends tried her immediately we testified her performing wonders.

    • @bensonarmstrong7287
      @bensonarmstrong7287 10 днів тому

      Her good strategies of making large amount weekly profits for her clients are totally outstanding. Investing my $1500 with doubt and withdrawing $12,300 with happiness. I ❤️ you Lucy.

  • @todortodorov6056
    @todortodorov6056 12 днів тому +1

    Tarifs only work if there is a viable (domestic) alternative. Where are they going to buy iPhones, MACs, PCs, electronics from? Those are not produced outside of China in quantities / supply enough to satisfy the demand. And same is true for many other products - with some exceptions, for example simpler stuff like clothing etc.

  • @aniksamiurrahman6365
    @aniksamiurrahman6365 13 днів тому +3

    The funniest thing is - every western analyst thinks or at least preaches that one can judge the situation of the real economy using the stock market! Or that their judgement based on that is valid in any way.

    • @JColdery
      @JColdery 12 днів тому +1

      Investor sentiment. Build factory. Factory employ. Mutual funds. Life savings. American wages. Very high. Yes.

    • @freetorobandloot
      @freetorobandloot 11 днів тому

      The stock markets run western economies. China doesn't care about the stock markets because they get their money from the trade surpluses with other countries. Those trade surpluses are reinvested into their economy. On the other hand, western countries use the stock markets to gauge the health of their economies but it is flawed because only the rich is benefitting from stock markets. The middle class and poor will continue to get poorer as inflation hits and wages decrease.

  • @tonywyli
    @tonywyli 3 дні тому

    Is CPC! You can't even get the name right!

  • @marks7566
    @marks7566 13 днів тому +6

    Interesting thumbnail. Pretty sure the Chinese don't use Yen.

    • @nzrock1
      @nzrock1 13 днів тому +7

      Both the JP Yen and CN Yuan uses the same symbols...

    • @AoShinden
      @AoShinden 13 днів тому

      thats the yuan

    • @nloadergd9193
      @nloadergd9193 13 днів тому +3

      they use the same Y sign

    • @ru2225
      @ru2225 13 днів тому

      Interesting comment. It shows your ignorance.

    • @marks7566
      @marks7566 13 днів тому

      @@ru2225 Actually, it should be 元, but yes, I'm ignorant.

  • @kingabzthebabz8493
    @kingabzthebabz8493 12 днів тому

    “Why else would you watch a 10min video on trump’s position on china” because I’m eating bro

  • @victorln
    @victorln 13 днів тому +6

    Just a small nitpick; 2:23 the currency symbol should really be a $..

    • @eggpankakes
      @eggpankakes 13 днів тому

      The deficit is visualised accurately, it is the difference between exports and imports and this was visualised by adding the deficit amount onto the export amount to show it amounting to the value of imports. This is why the yellow bar reaches the 500 line but that is only because it is stacked on the imports.

    • @mayank.9203
      @mayank.9203 13 днів тому +3

      2:49 it hit 500 because they were talking about deficit , it started from the 100 something mark . So blue bar+ the yellow bar = the red bar . I.e export+ deficit= import .

    • @ru2225
      @ru2225 13 днів тому

      Just a small nitpick; you misread the graph at 2:49

  • @mustang8206
    @mustang8206 13 днів тому +1

    Don't forget that Trump also plans to cut taxes in other areas so theoretically increased costs what have too much impact on the average citizen

  • @Achelleas67
    @Achelleas67 13 днів тому +10

    China depends on productivity.

    • @pablosskates7067
      @pablosskates7067 13 днів тому +5

      Productively stealing.

    • @waileungchong7507
      @waileungchong7507 13 днів тому +1

      The American farmers are building tent cities .
      They will be moving into the tents very soon.

    • @waileungchong7507
      @waileungchong7507 13 днів тому

      ​@pablosskates7067 From a country that bombs women and babies in Gaza .
      A bomb made in America cost 5 thousand dollars.
      But the American government will charge the the American taxpayers half a million dollars for a 5 thousand dollar bomb .
      Sick Yankees. 😅

  • @symonsmith3497
    @symonsmith3497 7 днів тому +2

    Long live China.

  • @MegaBanne
    @MegaBanne 13 днів тому +8

    It wouldn't survive no matter what.

    • @azliaheaven
      @azliaheaven 13 днів тому +3

      🤣

    • @tabitha7156
      @tabitha7156 13 днів тому +1

      People have been saying china is going to collapse in 5-10 years for the past 30 years.

  • @jimgranite
    @jimgranite День тому

    I am more concerned with whether America's economy can survive Trump. His tariffs are going to directly hurt my business.

  • @terrymcmaster2787
    @terrymcmaster2787 8 днів тому +2

    China has a huge surplus. Trillions. No loans. USA has a huge deficit. Trillions. No money.
    Guess what is going to happen?

  • @TienyeeTien
    @TienyeeTien 2 дні тому +1

    If he can he would have done this in his first term

  • @XYZHENG-f4r
    @XYZHENG-f4r 12 днів тому +4

    It's not whether China will survive, it's whether America will survive. China-America's trading has been degrading anyways. Although it will cut some profits, the impact of tariffs is limited.

  • @mustang8206
    @mustang8206 13 днів тому +1

    I think the White House should publish a list online on of what the top imports are in different industries to encourage Americans to not buy from these brands. It probably won't do much but it'll have a some impact on the deficit

  • @cuthomas4664
    @cuthomas4664 13 днів тому +3

    One side of the discussion I rarely seen people talk about: Given tge current condition, would the world economy grow without Chinese or semi Chinese goods? The manufacturing of consumer goods or any mass production goods are optimal. We haven't seen Apple moving any iphone production line to the US for quite a long time since the iphone inception!

    • @azliaheaven
      @azliaheaven 13 днів тому

      it would staganate since it will require moving manufacturing to other places

    • @DanielBlak
      @DanielBlak 13 днів тому

      It grew before China was a major exporter. Maybe you don't remember but most products used to say Made In Japan 30 years ago.

    • @cuthomas4664
      @cuthomas4664 12 днів тому

      @ Yes, before China it was Japan. But the era of Japan manufacturing was before the globalization and the Japan only produced maybe 1/10 at max of consumers goods we used today. Made in Japan products back then only served industrialized countries. China now manufacturing for the world. Chinese domestic market is so huge 1.4 billion people, so the production cost is really optimized to the point of unproductive if manufacturing elsewhere for most of the things. You can say textiles made in Cambodia or Bangladesh, but the clothes and the sewing machines are coming from China!

  • @QALibrary
    @QALibrary 13 днів тому +1

    1% of USA farmers did not survive!
    This is because court filing shows the change of deeds/ownership of land.
    Becuse it was brought by Chinese people linked to Chinese banks linked to the Chinese government brought USA farmland.
    Due to tariffs working both ways, China blocked orders of certain crops from the USA.

    • @marlonruvalcaba386
      @marlonruvalcaba386 13 днів тому

      Also part of the retaliation of china is banning some crops imports.
      It will create an economic shockwave.