I Tried 'The Last of Us: Part 1' on PC to see if it's THAT bad... [4K]
Вставка
- Опубліковано 6 жов 2024
- Check out Apex Gaming PC's here: apexpartner.ap...
🔴 My Stream: linktr.ee/luke...
💻 2nd Channel: / @lukestephenslive
👾 My Discord Server: / discord
--------------------------------------------------------------------
The Last of Us Part I is a 2022 action-adventure game developed by Naughty Dog and published by Sony Interactive Entertainment. A remake of the 2013 game The Last of Us, it features revised gameplay, including enhanced combat and exploration, and expanded accessibility options.
My TLOU Pt. 2 Critique: • The Last of Us: Part I...
My TLOU Pt. 1 Critique: • The Last of Us | The U...
--------------------------------------------------------------------
╔═╦╗╔╦╗╔═╦═╦╦╦╦╗╔═╗
║╚╣║║║╚╣╚╣╔╣╔╣║╚╣═╣
╠╗║╚╝║║╠╗║╚╣║║║║║═╣
╚═╩══╩═╩═╩═╩╝╚╩═╩═╝
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe and I'll be your bestest friend!
#thelastofus #playstation #ps5
Check out Apex Gaming PC's to get a great PC from a company that takes real pride in their work: apexgamingpcs.com/products/luke-stephens
More like APE S*X
can you ask playstation about Bloodborne pc port cause i really miss the game or an Infamous port
No
i paid for the game and it doesn't even let me open it, it says insufficient ram and video memory despite my graphics card being better than the one in the minimum requirements. The ram is 8gb only but it runs even re4 remake on the highest setting possible with 30 fps so why block me from opening a game i paid for lemme run it and see it for myself
@@Jonathanainsley69 just refund it.
Luke: "For me runs perfect I don't see why so many negative reviews"
*Nasa's backup computer at his right hand running the game and preparing to take off*
Yeah, even at it the levels load like 5+ mins, so what it'd be on a standart one pc
@@cheap_clips One crazy thing is that other games with the same graphics details runs perfectly in PC with 4GB VRAM including Horizon, GoW, Days Gone and Uncharted. It's like they want us to change our PC for just this game.
He's out of touch.
Most people complaining its because there system sorry to say that but that is the issue. This type of games as good as they look they run ok only with monster pc's if you are really pushing the eye candy and of top of that you can mix the horrible port lol.
yeah, he cant compare when he has the top 1% gpu on the market atm lmao
The shader compilation process itself is generally performed on the CPU, not the GPU and only then once complied are the shaders are used by your GPU. Thats why your CPU usage was at 100%. So it really doesn't matter that you have a RTX 4090 GPU at least as far as time to compile the shaders is concerned.
Actual gigachad information
Thx Chad, you're most certainly correct.
My CPU and GPU were both pegged. And it wasn't from anything else I was running.
That's true but his CPU is in the same range as 4090 so it's pretty bad
@@Tameot34 He should just let GF Exp set the right settings.
The editor is criminal for the sound replacement on sarah's death. im laughing so fucking hard
Honestly, Editor needs the punishment of the wrath of the negative review mob
This should be a federal crime😂
They made this port as bad as possible to take heat off of the show.
Replace her voice with Arnold Schwarzeneggers voice. Arrrgh arrrrrrgh 🤣
@@joebenson528 what heat? It was a huge commercial and critical success.
Remember that people need to apply for refunds before the 2h mark. Compiling shaders for over half that time is insane.
They've done it on purpose. They can't be this incompetent.
Here's the deal if they don't have a shader compilation step people will complain that it stutters but if they do people will complain that it's too long at the end the devs can never win. Id much rather deal with shader compilation step rather than stutter, and shader compilation will only get longer until Computer Scientists and Computer Graphics experts find a way to eliminate shader compilation
@@randomyoutubeuser8509 You do realize that Shader Compilation takes about 1 minute? Games like Elden Ring take about 30 seconds to compile shaders on my 3060 Ti and Elden Ring looks waaaay better than this badly optimized VRAM eater and even if you compile those shaders, you would still stutter a lot with a 8 GB card on high settings at 1080p.
and loading times on top of that. ps5 loads in seconds, pc takes MINUTES
@@randomyoutubeuser8509 It stutters plenty even with the shaders compiled.
"The last VRAM of us". That review had me in stitches, I'm not gonna lie hahaha.
How did you get hurt?
@@joebenson528 🐒
@@joebenson528 monkey
@@joebenson528 🐒
you mean the crash of us
I think it's another example of why shader compilation should be an added task to the game installation workflow. Sure, it will take longer to finish the installation of games that require it, but you're not forcing your players to occupy their primary display with a game they shouldn't play for a long stretch of time, especially when they ultimately launched the game because they wanted to play it right now. Idk about you guys, but I don't launch new games in anticipation of shader compilation taking so much time that I will need that to run it while I do something else and come back to my PC later. Is this user-error? Partly, but I do think this is an indication that something needs to improve here.
@@drakeizatt While you are correct, there are more creative solutions than what you are describing, such as a seperate executable that would not require any input from the user and could scale utilization based on other apps' needs. Pie-in-the-sky, perhaps, but harder problems have been solved in the gaming space, and this is directly and indirectly affecting the bottom line of companies if poor reviews due to user-error are impacting sales, which they no doubt are.
Shader compilation should be MANDATORY before playing any game.
And some do: You won't be able to play them if the shader didn't compile.
It was actually what happened for me when I played Horizon Zero Dawn for the first time. I just went on doing some works, clean my room, make a little snack and play some games on my phone while the shader was compiling. And once it was done, I just had a blast playing the game and kinda forgot about all the time I was waiting. I guess it's like removing a bandaid. It's quite painful but then you forget about it.
@@ainanomena9276 I don't disagree - I usually can spare 5-10 minutes prior to playing a game for shaders to compile. What I am getting at here is that there is not enough preventative measures to starting a game without compiled shaders. As games increase in complexity and resolution, while old/slow hardware is introduced to games like this likely due to poor price/performance in new hardware, shader compilation may take an hour or two for the average gaming rig in a few years. If we're having this problem already with a game that likely takes 30 minutes to an hour for the average gaming rigs, this issue will only exacerbate over time.
@@drakeizatt Well the shaders are stored in a cache on the harddrive and then sent to the GPU and held in the VRAM which is why you only need to sit through a long shader compilation screen like that once when you first boot up the game for the first time, technically you could install shaders during the initial installation but the problem is that on PC every one has different drivers and different system configurations. This why the game needs to run before the shaders are compiled for the first time, it also allows you to take advantage of game ready drivers.
I haven't seen something so tragic since Joel went on a date with a golf club
Yeah but the golf club smashes heads, this game melts the cpu
😂
At least you can get some enjoyment from a golf club. There was no enjoyment with part 2.
*Background music*
Luke: "This will never stop being really difficult to watch"
Me: *Spits out water*
@@jake51515 I would say that's a matter of opinion.
I love how luke was saying you can never watch Sarah's death scene without getting emotional and Jacob comes in with the comedy music over the top completely killing the tone 😂
Love the channel you guys do great work!
IT WAS SO FUNNY HAHAHA
You can. It's sad, sure, but it's certainly not a "you WILL cry during this".
Comedy music? Jesus am I now that old that the Banjo Kazooie music is now completely unknown to young gamers? 🥲
@@JSAiKO omfg no way 😂 my apologies I'm 29 I should know that!
Never had a n64 as a kid so banjo is completely alien to me 😂
TLDR: You SHOULD NOT be buying this. Just because my supercomputer was able to run it ok after 15 minutes does not mean that the value proposition for the average consumer is good. Steer clear until they fix these issues. Furthermore, some people are reporting bugs and glitches, and while I didn't have any, it's possible you might. To be safe, just wait and save your money.
This needs like 6GB VRAM for 1080p minimum settings, 8+ on 1080p medium
RAM usage easily goes up to 20+ GB
I dunno man, I have a mid-range PC and run it at a constant 80fps on High with no issues. This seems like a consumer-side issue.
Just pirate bro
aye aye
I have a 3060ti and a AMD Rysen 5 5600x with 32GB of RAM. Will this run okay or would u say wait for patches?
I genuinely cried laughing at the copyright music work around.
Gets only 100 fps on the most expensive piece of tech on the planet earth: "it's not that bad"
*consumer tech, to be fair
Honestly i was seriously thinking on spending 1800€ that i've made during my summertime employment to upgrade to a 4090 from a 1080 because i haven't touched any GPU's for almost 8 years now but seeing how many unoptimized games are coming out, an upgrade like that seems like the dumbest thing to do right now.
@@GRGCompletionist check your cooling and power supply when you update to a 4090.
Big chance you already know that. But just to be sure
@@DovahVokuna yeah i know, i'll be needing a new PSU for sure because the one i have right now is a 750W. Not sure about the cooling though. The one i have is a H80i v2 liquid cooler right now.
@@GRGCompletionist good. About the cooling. I would ask a expert just to be sure. Not familiar with the one you have. Take care buddy.
Title: Is it THAT bad?
Thumbnail: Yeah, it’s THAT bad.
Luke in video: It’s not THAT bad.
Luke in comments: It's THAT bad Do not buy
Clickbait at its finest
He didn't say its bad in thumbnail, but that it was complicated. That's not the same as "THAT bad"
@@CHRISCAMPO-wq8bi he changed the thumbnail then. When I wrote this, it said “It’s THAT bad” lol
@@LittleBobbyTV LMAO he changed the thumbnail.
"yeah so i ran this game on my high-end multiple thousand euros gaming pc and decided that it is not that bad" hillarious
They addressed this, and do not recommend purchasing the game right now.
@@NaptownClassic i believe his skull is too thick to understand
I too ran it on my 5000€ rig and have to say, it’s not that bad.
@@NaptownClassic who is "they"? Are you talking about Luke? Because that's a "he".
Or are you talking about ND?
Yeah im running it on my 5k rig and also tried it on my 8k rig and 4k rig and runs ok on all of them😂
The fact that the 2 hours refund in steam could expire by waiting for the shaders to load is pretty crazy.
$2000 GPU, $700 CPU, $500 DDR5 Ram, $300 NVME SSD, $2000 Monitor.... Runs fine to me. No idea what everyone is complaining about.
😂
i'm using 700$ PC and i get about 80fps. So unless 80fps is suddenly horrible to your PC gamer standards i think the game is fine apart from the random crashes that people have reported, personally only has crashed for me once.
Yea but he’s on ultra in 4k ultra wide screen
In the show in fairness Grandma Adler was much more animal-like in her movements and such than Jimmy in the game, so it's easier to believe Joel wouldn't waste time trying to reason with an infected who is leaping after his daughter
Plus she was just senile and now she's sprinting at them screeching even after a heavy tumble out the door
he should’ve let granny devour his daughter
@UPedits... yeah, it IS an element of Joel's character that is left out, no doubt about that
I'd say it's pretty goddamn animal like to slam your body through a plate glass door
Very true. And even then, he DID hesitate. He waited to kill her until she was near him.
10:54 i thought i was the only one that missed carpet. I LOVE carpet and don’t mind the upkeep. The cozy feeling of taking off your shoes and digging your toes in. I’m with ya Luke.
Do you not have socks on
I have upstairs carpet and I don't go upstairs because my family sleeps up there but it's amazing
i used to do cable... and whenever i was at a home(clean) with carpet i would just sit on the floor....sometimes lay while i waited for dispatch to answer the phone
I lived in a house with carpetting everywhere but the kitchen and bathroom floors for 20+ years, then I moved into a place that has zero carpetting anywhere. I miss carpets
@@digitalbarrito3555 whaaaat in the UK we have carpet everywhere as standard. Except the kitchen and bathroom basically
I had a really funny glitch were people suddenly were completely wet. Like right out of a pool. Noticed it first with Joel and the it was really funny when it happened to Robert because it looked like he was really nervous and sweating a lot from seeing Joel and Tess
You can disable black bars in cutscenes for ultrawide in display settings -> ultrawide pillarboxes -> minimal
I must take back my initial good impressions. After roughly 1.5 hour of flawless gameplay the game started crashing on me hardly. It sometimes even takes down the whole system with it. It crashes consistently after few - call it 10 - minutes of playtime.
What is your specs?
@@Espen_1995 3950X, 64GB , 3080 FE, 4k&60, DSL Balanced
Took me 2 hours to build shaders on a 2070 Super with an i7-7700 intel processor, ridiculously long wait.
Game was running decently for me in the 2 hours i played afterwards, not a single crash. Was playing on high settings, did get some fps drops below 60 depending on the area I was in.
Having just finished playing the Resident Evil 4 Remake prior, I have to say the difference performance wise is night & day. If RE4 runs smooth on my rig, there is no excuse for TLOU to run so poorly.
How did you manage to play it on high?!! I have 3070, i7-11700k, 32GB ram and can barely play it low-med, nearly capped VRAM.
@@majdingjeqari2448 No idea, my cpu was at 90% the whole time though which is pretty insane.
I love listening to your commentary. I'm at work, making Spanish flash cards for studying, sitting in a garage, and your voice and commentary is truly soothing to my soul.
Im so surprised considering their track record with pretty amazing ports and this is their biggest franchise. I was really waiting for this one too.
was this port even developed by naughty dog?
my theory is they're forced to release the game waaay earlier then it should be to accompany the show. Looks like it needs a longer delay.
To clarify this point, this was done by Iron Galaxy. The incompetent chads behind the sloppy port of Arkham Knight, Origins (still has a game breaking bug to this day), and also did both Uncharted Collection & The Last Of Us Part 1. As this group was picked to port and manage, I don't expect fixes to come in anytime soon. It is definitely on Naughty Dog and Sony for contracting this porting project to them.
Any delay is usually a bad sign
@@CommanderNam no
18:11 The Wilhelm scream during the explosion, lol. (I am glad, that I play my games on console. I don’t care about high frame rate too much and I don’t have to wait 2 hours to compile shaders.)
You have probably one of the best PCs that you can get right now so it's not surprising that you aren't having any issues.
I waited an hour for shader compilation and then got into the game and realized that despite having a 2070 super and an above recommended specs CPU, I can barely play the game with full medium settings at 1440p with DLSS on. So I even lowered it to 1080p, downscaled it to 720p, and was still having insane stuttering/freezing whilst barely managing 60fps, this all while lowering the more demanding settings which just made the game visually look worse than the PS3 version. My CPU at all times is pretty much maxing out at 100% no matter the combination of settings I use, so something is really hogging the CPU when it shouldn't be - not to mention CPU temps are going through the roof.
For the most part I get what you're saying but this narrative that's starting to arise about how *most* people aren't waiting for shaders to compile is just frustrating. It's annoying that the "top negative" reviews are literally from people who probably didn't wait, because myself and many others have written pretty detailed reviews about the issues after a few hours of playtime and are pushed pretty far down.
He's running a Intel i9-12900KF 16-Core and RTX 4090. He basically has a $4000 PC. Of course it's going to run well. It would be shocking if it didnt.
I got pretty much the reccomended specs to run the game; 2070 Super, Ryzen 5 3600, 16gig ram and been having the exact same problem you had; major stutters from the CPU load and RAM usage. Although, i have not waited the shaders to compile due to a tight refund window on steam in case i wanted to refund it.
Does waiting for the shader compile fix the problems you were having or is it futile and better to just wait for a hotfix? I still would like to have an opportunity to refund if i want to.
@@Alpacalips It's one of those things. If he had a lower tier PC - around the mid-range mark that he could try it on he's see what people are talking about
@@ryod8064 I never played it without waiting for shaders to compile so I'm not entirely sure how bad it could be without them - but I imagine that it's bad. I'd wait for a hotfix/patch though. The issues I listed were happening AFTER shader compilation, so maybe it would go away for you but for me these issues are very much prevalent, even after trying some fixes people have suggested. It's an optimisation problem
@@Alpacalips Also the frame dips, at times it went from 118 to 90 in minute 14. He didn't notice but imagine playing at 60fps then it drops to 30 or lower. That's a huge dip
Luke, you are playing WITH the patch.
Horizons PC port was not great on launch, the Uncharted Collection still has bad mouse controls and limited options and enhancements but The Last Of Us Part 1 is on a whole other level.
Exactly. He leaves out that context. I bought HZD on day 1 and had many crashes and bugs. Fortunately I haven't got Uncharted/TLOU and probably ever won't.
Your editor is a legend.
“Runs fine for me! All it takes is $5000 worth of kit.”
Thanks! Glad you enjoyed it!
the only problem I had and still have with the last of us on pc is the mouse stutter, I haven't had a single crash or bug happen, I run the game at 120 - 180 fps constant on all ultra settings too. sure the shaders took me 20 minutes to load but I just watched youtube with it in the background and didn't worry about it. I just hope they fix the mouse stuttering soon because I really don't want to have to play through the entire game with controller
Me too. I'm so disappointed. I own it on ps5 and played it with a controller already. I was really excited to play with mouse and keyboard and it sadly is jittery as hell when I pan the mouse. Framerate doesn't seem to matter. And I have 13900k and 4090.
Luke highlighting over Terra Nil and then asking "Yeah but has anything NEW come out?" is so perfectly emblematic of his entire value system lol
Thumbnail “Yeah it’s pretty bad…”
…Game proceeds to run just fine
Literally. people just like to complain
wat! its a 4/5grand pc?
@@Parker487 hes running on a 4090ti on recomended graphic its a 1500$ card
@@redwolf1502 I didn’t ask
It’s one thing to compile shaders, but it’s another one to see it take this long and go over the 2-hour mark and pretty much prevent people from refunding due to optimisation.
Horizon did launch with a rough state which people did forget! Shaders took for me, at the time, 15 minutes.
IronGalaxy simply can’t port games to PC but they made some miracles for the Switch. And it’s a shame since they’ve been in rough times with Rumbleverse. We don’t know how much of the team is still there after the Arkham Knight PC debacle, but one thing is sure:
No one should have to buy a PC as expensive as Luke’s to play this game and have it run at reasonable performances.
As the old late TB said: Stop preordering video games!
You don’t have to. You’re exaggerating. No one said you have to MAX out games. That’s stupid. Every game on PC needs a specific hardware for it to work to its full potential. It’s an option. Like TF2. I don’t have all its options maxed out. I don’t care. And it’s an old game.
For instance, Doom 2019 needs just a 4GB Vram to be maxed out, but the new STALKER game needs 10GB of Vram, what are you going to do, go out and spend a bit for a graphic card with 12GB, or are you just going to use what you have? Exactly. Use what you have.
As long as you can play it smoothly, that’s all that matters.
@@sO_RoNerY considering this game focuses a lot on graphical aspects, I do think that it matters, you don’t really get the same immersive experience when the graphics are meh.
I would take an hour of shader compilation over stuttering any day.
We shouldn't even be having both problems but here we are unfortunately.
Yeah super-computers are better than other computers, who could've know?
i would rather have neither
You'll still get stuttering, even after the shaders compile.
With this game, you get both. That's the problem.
"works fine for me!"
*plays on the best gaming rig possible on the market*
If that's the bar for whether or not a game functions properly no wonder why every port is so garbage now.
20:14
“This scene will never stop to be dificult to watch”
Fax, i cant stop laughing
The problem here is that many people doesn't have a rtx4090 GPU 16core CPU, there could be bigger problems with a gtx 1070 ti and 8 core CPU maybe, it would be awesome to test it on some "more regular" hardware instead of highend nasa level PCs
It’s not aliasing issues, it’s V-sync.
In most cases instead of having screen tearing due to V-Sync being off the tearing will sometimes be at the top of the screen causing the rippling effect.
Thank you for being one the few folks that actually links the stuff they say they're going to in the description lol pet peeve that I greatly appreciate as a viewer. So many channels just do not
waited almost 2 hours for the shaders to compile, crashed many times while compiling in the main menu, but no problem for me after the shaders were done compiling. Been enjoying the game :)
The bigger real issue is VRAM. Your 4090 has 24GBs, a normal midrange card like a 3060 TI has 8GBs. This game can use a lot.
That's because 8GB vram GPUs should've not been a thing last generation. I have a 5700 with 8GB, and I'm alredy starting to feel it bottlenecking performances in some games. I can't imagine someone with a 3070 and the same amount of VRAM.
@@mondodimotori it’s fast, but you have to play in medium/high. I was at 90 fps on optimized settings but experienced ALOT of crashes, so much so that I refunded the game. First game that has ever pushed the limits of my card.
@mondodimotori Yep, a mid-high tier gpu with 8-10 gigs of vram is a joke, especially if it's $500+, glad i managed to get a reference model rx6800 about 2 years ago, sitting comfortably with 16 gigs of vram and 3070ti performance
That wilhelms scream at 18:13 😂
For me the big issue is vram usage. I only have an 8GB card and I have to run textures at medium, which quite frankly makes the environment looks pretty soft. It just seems like for the quality of textures it shouldn't take up so much ram. Along with this, there's also a memory leak that causes the game to, unsurprisingly, crash after playing for too long assuming it fills up your vram. You can fix this with a older version of a DLL, but that shouldn't be necessary. It still doesn't fix the very high VRAM usage.
I think this could be because the PS5 essentially has 16GB of vram as all of its system memory, and Iron Galaxy didn't make the port utilize PCs generally slower system ram properly. Instead they just load it all into vram.
The game works fine when going over the VRAM limit its probably some kind of bug since for me its not crashing or affecting fps. The game says its using 10 gb of vram while my gpu only has 6 gb
@@MalteK is it on 🔥 yet? How do you do it? How many system Ram you have?
@@musicamusicamusica2944 it works fine after 7 hours i just go over the limit comfirm the settings and start playing i have 6 gb Vram
@@MalteK How about the temperature?
And you are playing on low settings?
@@musicamusicamusica2944 the temps are fine nothing over normal and i am maxed out at 1080p, my specs are rx 5600 xt, Ryzen 5 3600xt and 16 gb 3200 mhz cl 16 ram
I remember the Horizon Zero Dawn PC version when it launched taking easily up to 10 minutes of shaders compilation every time there was an update.
I suspected that waiting for the shaders to be compiled was the way to go, but I launched it anyway, bc there's no way it takes so long. Even without that, I also had crashes like the one in the main menu (and another one in-game, but the shaders weren't finished.
I started crashing like an hour in the game now I can’t pass the same spot in the downtown area. Other than that it was running pretty well. 5800x3d, 3080ti 32gb of ram
Is it fixed?
When you are building shaders for any game your CPU is at 100%
Jeez, I’ve only had my pc for about 4 years and waiting for shaders is just a habit for me now. I install a game, start it up, and go do something for 30 minutes just in case there are shaders I gotta wait for. I thought everyone did this but I guess not 😂
Excellent video as always man, one small correction : Horizon port was not great
Amen
It came out broken, I pre-ordered it, but now (several years later, I know) it runs flawlessly, like new
That pprt was one of the worst I've ever experienced in my life. Utter dogshit.
Game is buggy and poorly optimized on consoles = Developers are blamed.
Game is buggy and poorly optimized on PC = PC is blamed.
For me the only problem i have with the game is the mouse sensitivity/acceleration it feels like im playing with 30 fps even tho my game runs above 60fps. That happens mostly when aiming with guns and looking around
IK you're not looking for this answer, but i recommend playing this game with a controller, it feels way more smoother and immersive.
@@Ligmaballin who df plays shooter games with a controller on a pc, that's just being a peasant right there
@@FizCap L take tbh, this game was made for playstation, to be played with a controller. 3rd person story games in general are more enjoyable playing with controller anyway. GTA, red dead, mafia games, tomb raider, watch dogs, tlou, god of war, horizon, uncharted, spiderman. What else? I can do this all day.
@@reezwave More enjoyable if you enjoy using aim assist and having the game played for you, but as a man I would rather land my own headshots rather than have the game do it for you
@@reezwave More enjoyable is totally subjective.
RDR2 and GTA5 driving is more enjoyable for me with controller. Walking and aiming is definitely more enjoyable for me with m+kb.
M+Kb is the default control scheme for the PC platform. If a company releases a game on PC, they would be silly to not optimize for this control method. OR... put a sticker on the box that says you need a controller.
I have an RTX 3080, and after letting the shaders build and updating my GPU driver, I had no issues at all playing the game on High settings at 1440p at 110-130FPS
What kind of cpu do you have?
@TheBlahhhMan i9-10900k
Be glad you have the rtx 3080. People with the rtx 3060ti, 3070 and 3070ti cant run the game properly. 1440p high setting uses 10.5GB of VRAM and those 3 cards only has 8GB of VRAM. So you are stuck to medium settings which looks really bad and have 120-150 fps. On those 3 cards they have the horse power to run the game but not enough VRAM. Also low setting 1080p uses 5.1GB of VRAM so those guys with gtx 1650, rx 6400,6500 cant run the game without stuttering and have really bad textures also the rx 6600,6650xt,rtx 3050, gtx 1660 ti/super , gtx 1070 cant run higher than 1080p high settings since it uses 7,9GB of VRAM. 1080p ultra you need at least 10.5GB of VRAM to run.
@@BladeCrew ah crap i have a 3070 ti and this is probably the first game where i have to use lower settings
@@BladeCrew Except it doesn't use that much VRAM. From what I can tell the menu graph thingy HIGHLY overestimates the VRAM requirements. And yes I run it on a 3060ti. The performance is a little meh of course but people getting scared of the menu and not even trying to start the game and dial in their settings is crazy.
nitpick: 11:41 that's not ray traced. TLoU on PS5/PC doesn't use RT, they're most probably duplicating geometry, just like for they did for the mirrors.
Last of us part 1 on pc doubles as a cpu stress test! NICE
Yeah my shaders took about 2 hours to compile. Game still runs CPU at 100% and for some reason its only using 1% of my GPU and I get worse performance when I lower the quality.
Guys just buy a console, once I put the Last of us Part 1 disc on my PS5, 10 seconds later I was playing the game. I am so glad that I never built a gaming PC and stuck to consoles.
Bruh thats what im saying. On PS5 PT 1 loads in less than 30 seconds. PC is overkill AND the ports dont even work half the time.
i mean good for you to like it on console but i will stay here on pc, granted i don't play this game and have no interest in it considering i've already played it on ps4 back in the day.
I like 100fps. No thanks
Now he's starting the video as he walks into the room.
One day he'll start the video as he enters his house...
I have a 4080 and there's constant stuttering. I have it installed on an M.2 SSD and 32gb ram. I think you are the best example of running the game properly because of your PC.
Bro, just get a 4090. Problem solved. He has a 4090. Did you know he has a 4090? Just get a 4090. He has a 4090.
@@chexmixkitty I uhhh, played the game with a 3080TI and it worked like a dream. Only crashes when I quit to main menu. I have no idea why this port is so broken and weird that people like that guy can't run it better than me, it's absurd, hope they patch this sooner rather than later.
I have a 4090 and 13900k and its jittery as hell when I pan the mouse. Fps low or high doesn't fix it. My brother has a 12900k and 3090 and it runs fine 🤷♂️
26:18 the game would crash for some people during building shaders so thats why there was a crash count, and you can't start a new game without building shaders (so its required)
Actual gameplay starts well after 5:20
Actual gameplay starts in 09:13 lol
@@MrLachapell There is no gameplay, it's just walking in a straight line at a snail's pace while listening to mediocre dialogue for literally the entire video lol
I am not sure what your point is making this video. I installed the game, I waited 20+ minutes for shaders to compile, made it through the Sarah scene to Boston and the game crashed while Joel listened to a conversation between people on the street while following Tess. I gave up for the night and tried the next day after the first patch. I got less than 2 minutes further than before. This time the conversation didn't crash me, the truck blowing up cutscene did. I have a 3080 and a decent CPU, my system was built last year so it's not a relic. You can press X to doubt all you want but the game does not run smoothly for us mere mortals. This is the fourth time I have bought this game now and it ran more reliably on the original PS3 than it does for me on PC.
to be fair, most people don't really understand what "compiling shaders" really is, they might think it's just unpacking some stuff or things like that, not to mantion it's still kind of a new thing for pc players since most games are ready to play the moment you install it...
Luke should also have a mid-tier pc and show us what most of us would probably experience.
Took me 3 hours to load shaders, got a 6600xt and I5-9400f, super surprised. One isusue I knoticed that you didn't have was the Please Wait... Screens. Alot if people are having this issue it seems, just a 3min loading screen every 5min.
"this scene will never not be difficult to watch" *cue banjo solo*
I have the same experience as you, the game is running “well” for me and you’re explanation of how people are having a bad time was exactly my thought process. I am disappointed with the hardware table image on the store page and I’m in the 1440p 60fps on high settings range, and I have an i7 11700k, 3060ti, and 32gb ram. I ended up having to play the game on medium settings with only like 1 or 2 things at high like both Ray tracing and screen space reflections with DLSS enabled because I want to make the game as beautiful as I could with what I have and I end up getting 80-120 fps (again with medium settings) because I also want to value frame rate. It’s a bit frustrating that they practically lied about the hardware capabilities because imagine people at the low range of the table, the game could or is unplayable for them.
Textures look ugly as hell on medium
Well it’s better than low and when I meant 1 or 2 things at high it was the textures. It seems like you are misunderstanding what I’m saying. I want to balance my graphics and frame rate whilst playing at 1440p, why would I want to play at all high settings with reflections and no DLSS when the game has an unstable frame rate. As of now that will probably run at or under 60fps. Funny thing is I can run Uncharted at Ultra and I’m getting about 140-150+ fps that is with DLSS on, with it off I get like 110-125 fps
anyone else notice there are far less npc's running around? and when joel is kicking out the window of the car it no longer has the zombie clawing at the guy in the car across
Zombie is still there clawing the guy, you just need to look better
@@jistersmister1942 just to clarify. 16:46 is the bit I'm talking about, I only see a dead body chillin out
@@jistersmister1942 actually no your right, just check the original and its not there. nvm
I don't know if you'll try it in this video but supposedly replacing version 2.9.6 of Oodle in the files with 2.9.5 or anything newer than 2.9.6, it will fix the performance issues and will make the shaders build faster. It doesn't fix all the issues, but the big things are. So if you don't do that in this video I'd make a follow up video to this doing that and commenting on how much it improved the game for you.
Why don't YOU replace it and report back to us? This "theory" is being parroted everywhere and yet few reports of it doing a damn thing.
@@Kr33py Because I didn't buy the port because I knew it would be completely messed up by Iron Galaxy. I've seen tons of people say it improved the game for them though, which I would expect it to because Oodle 1.9.6 is known to be bugged. I just want to know how much better because some people get massive improvements, some get small improvements. And the game is still gonna have issues though just because of how messed up it is.
@@Kr33py I have done it and it works great. I've had zero problems since I did it!
@@mjl3631 It didn't help for me. Still crashes.
Tell me how i replace oodle Pls and il give you the link. I have no idea what oodle is or where i find this version.
The box said the pizza takes 20mins at 180c. Ate some at 4mins. Overly HOT, dough is still raw, toppings completely uncooked, cheese was even still hard. 0/10 I won't be eating again.
Surely its not THAT bad when your running it on a RTX 4090 LOL.
One thing you didn't realize? Customers aren't obligated to give any product a "fair chance". Other games can be played normally and this game requires extra hours to do its unique thing at the expense of play time? It get shit reviews.
All those 0.2 houred resource consuming reviews are totally legit. The players didn't buy a 3A game called shader compiling. You force players to do this work in your stead, you better make sure the process is not annoying.
Although compiling the shaders taking a long time is not ideal, I would take that over constant stuttering. If it actually does run well after compiling, then I am somewhat sympathetic. Hope they fix things!
Understand something. Not all games and engines are the same. Shaders taking long probably has a reason for that. More buildings, characters, grass, cars, roads, horses, windows, etc that use shaders.
@@sO_RoNerY Still something that shouldn't take long. Buildings, characters, blah blah. Stop trying to say something that exists in all games. GTA 5, Red Dead Redemption 2, Elden Ring have all of those and still don't even come close to loading shaders for 1 minute straight. Elden Ring is leagues better than TLOU visually and still takes like 30 seconds to load shaders. Same for Red Dead Redemption 2. They both look so much more better and take so little to run smoothly. Unlike the Last of Optimized games.
@@thatguy3000 Elden Ring looks like a last gen game on technical side. Art itself is fantastic besides that.
i'll be damned if i need $15,000+ super gaming pc just to run this game as it should be without a hitch, then again we still see stutter and freeze of the game in this video
Returnal’s port was also good, and made the game better.
It had problem with stutters when entering new areas especially but overall it was a decent PC version. However it probably was way easier to port considering it was on Unreal Engine and not an in house engine like The Last Of Us
One of the huge problems is given the 2 hour window for being able to return a game to steam for a refund means there is the possibility a long shader compilation could make it not possible to return the game if it doesn't run well on your machine after the compilation.
its crazy because most of sony's ports have been great like days gone playing at 1440p max settings at 200 plus fps and it looks and plays amazing , so im surprised the last of us is preforming this badly , have yet to try it on my rig 5800x3d 7900xtx , will try later hopefully im one of the lucky ones that doesent have to many issues
The difference between a ps4 game port and a ps5 game port.
Except Zero down. That one was terrible
@@teeman7137 It's fine now for the most part.
I’ve tested the game in a mid range machine and it runs perfectly fine on 5600x + RTX 3060. Shaders took 20m to compile and I’m willing to accept it as the game runs without hitches on 1440p high on DLSS quality. No crashes, no freezes.
How much vram it uses on the settings you play on? I have 5600(nonx) and rx 6700(nonXT) which is closer to rtx 3060ti in perfomance and has 10gb vram.
@@Marko-ij4vy it used around 10gbs using dlss and 11 gbs on native which I guess makes sense as they’re recommending the 2080ti (that is a 11gb card) to this resolution
I think the shader compilation is a problem, but even worse is the VRAM requirement which can really tank your peformance when not met as other tests have shown. At 1440p ultrawide you needed 15GB of VRAM playing at 3440x1440p, now imagine how much it needs at 4K which has 67% more pixels or 1440p which has 75% of the pixels and linearly that makes 25GB at 4K and about 11GB at normal 1440p. If you then factor in that the vast majority of the RTX 3000 series GPUs and earlier GPUs have 12 GB VRAM at most and voila, the VRAM is a big problem.
i play high to ultra settings and some unnecessary things in medium on my 1440p ultra wide monitor with my rx 6650 xt in 1080p but with fsr2 so its 1440p upscaled. and i have 65 - 55 fps (also i downloaded the driver special update for the last of us).
Then blame nvidia not the game developer who made it with the ps5 hardware in mind.
20:55 Boss: "Hey, how's that intro sequence you were remodeling going?"
Dev: "Ummm, about that... Abby got a bit frustrated at work last week and may or may not have smashed all our backup hard drives with a golf club..."
Boss: "Shit... I guess we'll just have to use the mp4 from the PS3 version."
It's amazing that you're one of the few that bothered to cache the shaders and didn't have issues... yet all of the outlets and UA-camrs that just hit New Game the second they can, magically find it unplayable for some unexplained reason.
There is a slight fix to replace a DLL file that can make the compilation faster (not like it will do you any good since you already cached the shaders).
It's still bad even after caching... it's literally because he isn't GPU/CPU bottlenecked.
My brother in Christ, it's using 100% of the CPU. That will bake weaker hardware and eat the lifespan of the components.
@@FelisImpurrator Facts i just played it on my Ryzen 5 5600x 6800 16b and 16bg ram just to get stuck after sarahs death by a please waiting screen and 100% CPU there was a 2.5 gb about 15 mins ago but it didnt help much haha
@@FelisImpurrator If you don't keep your componets cool... That's your problem. And no, even a few hours at 100% utilization won't eat the lifespan of components, if kept cool.
It’s totally not because dude has a NASA powered computer. I cached shaders too and my game crashed multiple times after Tess dying.
Brace yourself Luke. When you update your graphics drivers, those shaders will have to compile once more. Happens everytime you update your drivers.
I'm using a 3800x, 64gb ram, 1080ti, and installed on an SSD and while the shaders did take f'n forever. I have had no crashes and I'm about 10 hours in. Enabling FSR made a huge difference with the shoddy framtimes since I can't use DLSS. Mostly using ultra settings gettings more than playable frames. It seems like it depends a lot on the hardware you are using.
64 gb of ram? bro why
@@kaydenmcdonald5574 I was using the computer to run servers for a while while I was playing games. I never really used more than 32gb then but, eh... Why not. Only thing left to upgrade is the GPU at this point and I don't want to be fleeced by Nvidia but, I also want solid RT performance. Hoping for more realistic pricing in the future.
@@leleedler Ah yea. Yea it’s ridiculous how expensive cards are right now
I bet that at least 90% of PC players aren't even aware of what compiling shaders means, and I can't fault them for it when the game allows them to play it when it still needs to be done.
To some this might be general knowledge, but the vast majority isn't aware of these things.
For some building shader cache took over two hours.
For me with 5950x, 7900 xtx, 64GB ram and NVME SSD it took over hour and half. After that long loading and got huge stuttering every 20-30 seconds sometimes for second or two.
During compiling game peaked with 25+GB memory ussage.
I played it on a legion slim 7 with an amd 6800h processor, 6600s gpu on high settings and it ran very smooth averaging 70fps. I also want to add that I finished the game without any crashes.
Tbh most those bad reviews probably got the game not reading the spec list, thinking their GPU and CPU from 2015 could run it 💀
This is one of the remasters of all time
It literally isn’t, it’s a remake
@@jasongreen6826 by the absolute most bare minimum terms of what the word means. An actual remake would be resident evil 4 for example.
@@jasongreen6826 they called it a remake but it’s more literally a remaster
I really enjoy your videos man, I’m always excited to relax and watch Luke’s new vid.
me, the cognizant consumer: Does naughty dog seriously think I’m going to pay $60 to play another remaster if this game.
Future me: Upgrade to the digital deluxe edition?🥴Sign me up
Big surprise, negative reviews are usually very LOUD and usually very unpopular. Not always, but most of the time it's just people acting like children.
The game has been good for me, been playing at around 60 to 80 frames at nearly max settings. Only thing that irritated me was the building shaders thing
Same, but I'm running a 7950X3D and RTX 4090.
Same, only had 1 crash and i'm playing with 70-100fps on a RTX 3060 12gb, i know PC gamers love to cry when they don't get 360fps at minimum, but i'm fine with 70fps and it feels very smooth on a PS5 controller plugged in.
@@Ligmaballinhow due !! I'll get 50-70fps on a rx6600 if you get 70-100fps on a rtx 3060. I even set the graphics to low and the fsr 2.0 to ultra performance, but it still only gets 40-50fps :v
Mine plays great 70-90 fps. 3090ti and 10850k 32 gigs ram.
It's insane that this guy can't see the stuttering while panning the camera with the mouse when I can see it in a 60fps UA-cam video
Running on a 3080 ti, 5600x. After shaders compiled (i did not run the game while doing this, common sense) it started off perfect, and then in early combat sections it definitely started sputtering a little here and their but definitely something thats fixed 1st patch. Only 1 hour in after another hour of shaders, and yet im still happy with my purchase
I'm playing the game on an i9 10900KF, RX 7900 XT, Samsung 970 Evo Plus 2TB and 64GB of DDR4 at 3,200 mhz. I waited for the game to build shaders. My computer's cpu and gpu specs are above the PS5 specs. My PC has more cpu cores/threads and more vram than the PS5. The game defaulted to ultra settings at 4K and ran at a playable fps and still had terrible stutter and that was after all the shaders compiled. The only explanation I have for the game running terrible on my PC is that I don't have it installed on a pcie gen 4 nvme ssd that runs at the same speed or faster than the PS5's gen 4 nvme ssd. At least I got the game for free because of the promotion for buying an AMD graphics card!
The lesson here is you have to have a $4000 top of the line high end PC like Luke does to have little issues with TLOU 1 pc.
It doesnt seem that bad, because he's using 12900k+4090. That's how bad this game's optimization is
Oh man, guess I’m waiting a bit longer to play this for the first time 😂 glad I didn’t buy day 1
same, i wanted to do that but fortunately i waited and got re4 remake instead xd
Ryzen 9 5900x, 32gb of ram, and a 6950xt. Shaders took me about 70-80 mins. Everything cranked to max at 1440p I'm getting around 120-130 fps avg.
So far I love this game. Iron Galaxy also ported Uncharted. There was a shader wait there too though not as long. This game took 2 hours + for me to compile and launch, on a current gen AMD highest tier GPU with 24GB of VRam. I waited, made coffee, got some laundry done. Once I let that finish and while playing, gave the shaders time to fully catch up - which in this game, can take an hour - causing hitching - after that at least for ME it ran pretty smooth. Make sure you download latest gpu drivers, and be patient. If you have a decent pc and a lot of vram, and an nvme, I think it should be ok if you're patient. I do think they could have released a lower req not-as-next-gen version with the option to play at reduced settings for mid tier kids out there. Specs: 5800X3D, 7900XTX, 3600 32GB, NVME - it took a long time on the Deck as well and frames with everything on lowest including FSR and frames locked to 30 still dips to 25. Not a great choice for the Deck as of now.
Love how he changed the thumbnail of the video from "Yes, it's bad." to "It's complicated."
On the Steam deck it takes an hour and a half. The Steam refund window is 2 hours
if it takes multiple hours to compile and if the game still doesn't run well.. there goes your refund window.