Both of these refreshed full-size pickups were impressive, but in different ways. The Ram's interior and performance stood out, while the Ford's utility and smart cargo/bed solutions made it a true workhorse. It's rare that we end up with a comparison that's so neck-and-neck, but each truck has distinct strengths. So which camp do you fall into, team Ford or team Ram? Let us know in the comments below!
I like the ram better but I think a better comparison would be the F150 platinum vs the Ram tungsten. The king ranch f150 matches up with the ram limited longhorn.
Great overview. Last week, I drove a 2021 Ram Limited with the sea salt interior. Absolutely beautiful interior. I have been driving BMW M Sports for many, many years. The Ram 1500 Limited with the Hemi blew me away with acceleration, comfort, ride quality, low cabin noise, handling, and looks.
I am a Ford guy and I think the ram definitely has better materials etc. The tungsten trim is cool and very high quality. However I don't like the usability of the screen on the ram as opposed to the Ford. The Ford has more physical buttons which I like. And like he said the screen is more intuitive. The dash screen I prefer as well in the ford. The front storage in the ram looks amazing. Jealous of that for sure. But that's where it ends for me. There's no reason a truck manufacturer should require premium gas, that's insane. Ford has best of both worlds and can run 87 and 91 or 93. I'd like to see Ford with premium and how the 0-60 numbers compare then. I still think the ram would win, but atleast it would be apples to apples. I like the features of the Ford more like the tail gate step, rear lock box under the back seat, pro power on board etc. I believe also that the rams are known for having stupid low payload ratings. Can't do a truck with only 1,000lbs of payload. That's 4 Americans and your maxed out. If I had stupid money to spend I would get the Ford. I would build my truck exactly how I want it. Ford is king is the area as you can option your truck practically anyway you want, from gear ratio to engine etc. Plus the aftermarket support is much better. You could easily tune your ecoboost to make crazy power as it's been out for awhile. The ram is unknown at this point. My final thought is v6s are dumb and there should be a small v8 turbo because that's badass.
As a Ram owner, your points on the camera being squeezed to the top and android auto only using the top half are 2 of my gripes. The ride quality with the 4 corner air suspension was the real selling point for me. No other full size truck comes close. As for the lack of the Hemi, Id prefer the V8 over a more complicated 6-cylinder with turbos. Look at the reliability of the Fords when they first came out. 75K people having their engines replaced and turbos replaced. When you buying a vehicle that costs as much as a small house from the 2000's, I don't want one that needs more money in repairs.
@@snozbaries7652 I would hope so, but a friend in my neighborhood has a 2022 F-150 with the 3.5L twin turbo and under 25k miles, that just spent 4 months in the shop for "carbon buildup on the valves and in the exhaust housing of the turbo". The dealership said to install a catch can to alleviate the issues, and his response was, why doesn't it come with one? Ford knows that the PCV system vapors are the cause of the issue, but due to EPA regulations (which is also driving the switch to turbo vehicles) won't allow them to install them from the factory.
@actual.actual that's right.. It's a 3.5L. Definitely my mistake. And it's the direct injection that causes the valve build up. Port injection cleans them. Direct bypasses them and goes as it indicates.. directly into the cylinder. I have a Mustang that does both, port and direct.
@@actual.actual I'm not sure of the root cause of it, maybe poor fuel that found around our area? In my neighborhood of only 20 house, all 3 F-150 owners have had this issue. One, had a 2014 that required a complete engine replacement at just 65k miles. I know it's a small sampling compared to the big picture, but when the trucks cost upwards and above 70k, it steered me away from them. Pretty much any direct injected engine without a catch-can on the PCV system is going to have build up on the valves in the long run. When I bough my 2019 Mustang GT, my dealer immediately suggested one for it, if I planned to keep it longer than a few years. Even though that engine (5.0 Gen 3 Coyote) has both direct and port injection.
@actual.actual WV. And I think most of them run 87. Which I'm sure doesn't help performance in those at all. We can get 93 at almost any station though. Do the Ecoboost F-150s require 91 or higher?
@@fishonalbertaoutdoors9761 What a nonsensical commentary. Do you even know how much boost does a diesel pushes? I will tell you, A LOT more than these.
I love that Ram trims out the window bezel on the interior facing side of the doors. Note the visible red paint around the Ford's side windows from the interior, with the doors closed. Yuk. My beef with the interior of the new-ish Ram's interior is that the super handy upper glove box has been replaced with a stupid touch screen. The upper box still exists on lower trim trucks, but not even an option on Longhorn or Tungsten. A no-cost "Passenger Infotainment Screen Delete" option should be available to buyers. ARGHH!!!
Because it boils down to preference. The Ram is faster, smoother and has a better interior. The Ford is better at towing. So depends on you use case. I personally hate Fords after owning a 2022, and would never go back
@@golfgti47 yeah, people aren't buying a truck like that to work it. If they didn't have this, they'd have a Porsche or a high end BMW or Mercedes or something. Cruiser trucks are just the in thing now.
I like the look of the Ram , fit and finish are good. Seems most mechanics I speak to rate them poorly. The main reason I will stay with Ford is the aluminum body. I live in Maine where the only part of a vehicle that doesn’t rust is the tires. That is an area I can say the trucks I see rusting badly the fastest in my area are the Ram trucks. My F150 is 8 years old and I do try to take care of it , keeping it clean in the winter getting as much salt off as possible. There is Zero rust on my truck. So for me aluminum is the deciding factor.
I feel like the FORD is a little more iconic and has something that screams tough and built to last. The RAM is not iconic enough and is too "luxurious" for it to be a truck.
Have to agree, my super duty has the 2Kw and it's something I thought I'd probably never use (comes standard on my trim) but already I've used it several times for power tools, charging the battery on my chainsaw, powering a big floodlight, and a big fan, etc. And that's just the 2Kw.
Outstanding review in every way. I watched five reviews on this very truck comparison. This was by far the best one. All in under twenty minuets. I subscribed, keep up the good work.
As someone who has owned both a f150 and a ram. They’re both such great trucks you basically pick what one you think looks nicer. (My pick is the ford)
I’m in this exact scenario, choosing the RAM or F150. I really like the RAM and it does ride a little better than the F150, but I kinda like that the 150 feels more like a truck. Also, I think the 150 body looks better.
@@esan0715 lol funny hearing people picking a pickup truck by the interior not caring if it is great at doing and having what a truck is supposed to be for. I'd save my money and buy a car if all I wanted was a luxurious interior
@@fishonalbertaoutdoors9761 that's you. As for me, this does both. It does all the truck things I need, and hauls my family safer than most cars you can buy. Fortunately for me, I use my money to get what I want
@@esan0715yea the Ram is a whole other level. The new Ram not only out tows HDs, its little 3.0so smoked the ford 3.5ho up toaster hill even with the Ford making their entire body out of aluminum. I work in security and drive long distances so it's not even an option to have the lighter truck that is less of a truck in all truck capabilities.
you gotta remember FCA products are the least reliable among car manufacturers. They look good but they dont last as long as Ford is or other brands. Their heavy duty is good though. and yes I was a mopar guy but no more. Tired of their shit.
@@skyisdlimit6125If your knowledgeable on engines and design… you should know theoretically the best design for 6 bangers is a straight six. Not V6’s. Just a fact bud. Best design just like semi truck straight 6’s.
You failed to mention the trailer weight detection in the Ford or the CCD suspension (not available if you have the FX4). Still, with that Airstream, you (Edmunds) is advertising a dangerous scenario. That Airstream has a tongue weight around 850 lbs., your driver weighs about 200 lbs., but the truck (King Ranch) only has a payload capacity of 1300 lbs. so you can barely take another passenger but nothing else otherwise, you will be overloaded. As a 2024 King Ranch and Airstream owner, ask me how I know.
No way around it, these new twin turbo 6 cylinders are insane. Motortrend got 4.4 0-60 for the Tungsten. Im willing to bet these motor in the new charger would put it right behind the old 700hp hellcat. Any way you slice its, mid 4s 0-60 for a 3 ton gas car is absurd for a non performance oriented trim. Anyone complaining about the V8 being gone is brainless. This is coming from someone who daily drives a V8 sports car lol
What weight were you towing? Example Airstream makes a 23 fter, 25 fter, and a 27/28 ft model. Looks like a 27 ft in test, but you don’t specify??? Would like to know please thanks
How is fuel economy not a criteria in the article. I like the ram a lot more but requiring premium for combined 17mpg is gross and that's your only powertrain choice you have with the higher trim levels.
They don't require it but I would not run the cheap crap in a high powered twin turbo motor, unless your out in bfe and its all that's available. The ford also recommends it for the power and while towing, Chevrolet 6.2 also requires 91 for the best power. It's not a huge difference for cost, most other expensive suv or sedans often require it of the same price. At what most trucks cost usually 60-75k msrp most can afford the small price difference, but in reality I don't understand how so many can afford these expensive trucks besides a business.
Ford F150s have the highest depreciation in the quarter ton market. Ram 1500 has 55k trucks available nationwide, F150 - there are a whopping 128k trucks available for sale. These numbers are both for new trucks. Not including used. But damn. That means there is nearly 2500 new Fords in each state
The lie-flat seat is very gimmicky; because your legs and knees still sit bent to the floor, it is never going to be as good as a bed and only marginally better then a standard seat reclined back. I have slept in it a couple times when camping in a storm, and I find I can sleep just as well with it fully flat as I can slightly reclined (with neither being as comfortable as a camping cot).
All I got from this is: if you need a pickup to do pickup things, buy the Ford. Bigger bed, higher payload, higher towing weight, on board power supply, etc.... The difference in price more than makes up for what the Ford may lack in luxury appointments that aren't really all that necessary/needed in a truck. Kinda like how you glossed over the 7kw onboard power that can power a worksite or an entire house in emergency situations during storms, power losses, etc... That alone, places it way above the Ram. Trucks work, that's what they are made for. The Ram is an overpriced luxury car wannabe that can sometimes do truck stuff.
Handling between these two close? You weren’t pushing hard enough. F150 front end feels too soft, and the rear too stiff to the point that it jitters and jumps out. Makes the front end always feel like it’s folding the tires under, just an unbalanced chassis in general. Ford also has some snafus on interior, starting with turn signal indicators in gauge cluster, they’re hard to see. Ram is the better driving truck by far. That said, with no physical oil dip stick on new Ram engine that’s a big red flag. Relying on a sensor. Sensors and electronics in general have a much higher failure rate than physical components.
@@g.donuts3551 I think the video reviews conclusion checks out though. Ford intended for their trucks to do better when loaded or towing whereas it seems the Ram excels when unloaded. It's a trade off just depending on what you prioritize.
The review fails to mention that premium gas is a requirement for the Hurricane HO, and optional but "recommended" for the SO Hurricane in the RAM, greatly increasing the cost of ownership.
@@9663mu idk if it’ll be a 6.2 . Dont think GM will be having multiple V8s with different displacements anymore . No more 5.3 /6.2 . I think they’ll use a Gen 6 version of the 6.6 across the board for the light duty SUVs/trucks. Probably 450 hp/500 TQ
@@9663mu yeah the 5.3 has ran its course . Even an updated version would only be on par with the 5.0 in the F150 power wise and that’s not enough to run with the competition now . I think a 6.6 wouldn’t be any worse than the current 6.2 on fuel . I think GM should just use a version of the L8P crate engine they just introduced . Makes 523 hp/543 TQ. A milder version for production would be perfect as it’s a true truck engine . Fully forged internals , iron block
I imagine there will be more DOHC variants along with standard or commonly opted for hybridization. That would allow smaller displacement while retaining overhead for more powerful or higher displacement units in the expensive models without sacrificing emission and fuel economy.
What a great and detailed review of both trucks. I love the style, flexibility and luxury on the RAM, but Ford does not stay back with similar qualities. Great comparison. Thank you.
So, here im a ford fan and has been for many years , but that interior of the ram i mean is nice but to me, not a mile ahead of the ford. So the interior of the ram is nicer, but the screen is much difficult to use than the ford's. I really dont think they should add the mini screen opposite the passenger on the ram, as it takes up space where the glove box resides. So there are advantages on the interior of each truck over the other. Driving, its the ram but not by a mile. Towing goes to the ford also being more stable while doing so. Exterior overall slight edge to the ram, also the engine in the ram is more powerful, but we have to wait for its reliability, as the fords v6 has been around for years. To pick one of thease great American pickups, you'd have to see which advantages one have over the other. Finally, conclusion, i love em both, i really do, but this won't take long yall, the ford's going home with me. I can also use this machine to power my home in case the electricity goes out. Great job ford and ram
Yep. V8 is gonna be more reliable compared to other engine options from turbo V6 to turbo I6 to turbo I4. I honestly think the Titan had the most reliable V8 left since it doesn’t have start/stop or cylinder deactivation like the others. 1. Titan V8 2. Ford V8 3. GM V8s
Exactly!!! Them twin turbo will wear those engines out !!! Geez you can’t get a V8 on a half ton pickup!! The start of the end for these full size pickups !
then get a lower spec F150. you can get one of those optioned out very nicely. I feel like the top spec models just have a lot of gimmicks truck owners don't want or need.
So after 90 days Ford charges you $800 a year for blue cruise but Ram gives it to you for free for 3 years. There’s your “massive” gas cost difference for premium gas.
well if you’re an America first person then consider the ram because they are more American made than the ford F series, so is the cyber truck and the ridgeline…
Good video but if I was going to buy a Ram which I never would but if I was going to I would not buy the first year of an all new engine especially a twin turbo engine. One thing I don't like to see is how a lot of automakers are going to subscriptions for some of there features like Toyota you have to pay for remote start monthly. I think if your vehicle comes with something you obviously already paid for it so you shouldn't have to be paid for it every month 🙂
Tell me you’re not a truck user without telling me you’re not a truck user. Lol. How fast I can drive 0-60 doesn’t matter at all. I want to be able to take myself and any gear/people places reliably and with adequate power.
Just drove a 2024 limited long horn 1700 miles. Hemi e toque. 3 inch lift with 35s 12.5 miles on the high way. Barely 300 miles on a full tank. Will want to know if the hurricane offers better mpg than that. Because it’s so bad.
I'm a Ram 1500 man! One of the features on the Ford I don't like is that window swoop on the door. In my opinion, they need to move on from that. Again, my opinion 😊
Hybrid is a gemmic. Look at all the hybrid truck issues and how fast people are trying to unload them on the market. Speaking strictly about ETorque. Fords will soon follow. Oddly enough I see 350k mile 2.7 Eco boost engines with less issues than the 3.5 and the coyote engine. That little 2.7 is a beast and the winner with a tune!
The Ford's hybrid system is not a gimmick. It's about utility and some performance. Mpgs are minimal although better than a V8 in terms of mpgs. I have a powerboost. I used the onboard power a lot. I think the Etorque is gimmicky.
I follow your beautiful channel and the video was distributed to my friends in the Gulf, but I need your advice. I want to buy a new vehicle. Which is better? I buy a Dodge Ram eight-cylinder or a Ford F-150 eight-cylinder.
I have a 2016 F-150 with the 5.0 has never been to the dealer for repairs in 130,000 miles real work miles... I have a 12 Rubicon with 136,000 mi and $18,000 in repairs...
I dont know of many truck buyers criteria including a 0-60. I really only care about capability, affordability, and reliability. Everyday buyers are not taking their truck to the track.
Amen, especially at 2:14 I was like what!?!? Reliability, longetivity, easy and affordable repairs would be the endorsements I’d be looking for in a truck engine
Its not about taking the truck to the track and those numbers, it's the effortless and fun driving experience that a ton of power offers. It's addictive and hard to go back from.
@vladblazanin136 I get that. I was just being hyperbolic to make a point. Still highlighting that most buyers are mainly concerned with reliability, capability, and especially affordability, considering that most of these trucks have absurd prices with crazy markups.
I'm surprised the ram out ran the Ecoboost in a 0-60 test but I feel like he needs to double check that cause last time I saw a test with the new Ecoboost hybrid was doing it in about 4.7 seconds not 5.9 I own a gen 1 Ecoboost and it moved but if you're not good with the throttle it can feel sluggish off the line at the time but if you learn it you can jump off the line quick. As far as the trucks Ecoboost is proven, ram has the worst transmissions that's just a fact, and the ford is an aluminum body so it weighs less and it goes a lot more these new hybrid Ecoboost row around 14,500 pounds the hurricane ram only tows 11,300? If I remember in that range I know it's in the 11000 range, I mean my gen 1 Ecoboost that has less power and weights more tows 12000 pounds and if you don't believe me I just towed my 13000 pound conventional pull travel trailer to the beach a couple weeks ago without any problems.oh l! Also as far as charging goes all f150s after 2015 have a full inverter in the back seat and the hybrid can power a whole job site for a guy like me who runs his own business and works with his hands. also one last thing the ram hits max torque at way higher rpm me towing my 13000 pound trailer I was doing 60 at 1700 rpm it was fine. Also those air bags are why the ram feels better on the road. I have to keep adding things I just remembered another thing the ram doesn't have a 10 speed transmission either like the Ford which is just better.
2:14 no 0-60 is not a massive endorsement of these v6 turbo engines on $80k+ trucks. I can buy a tune for $1k and increase horsepower even more. Does this mean the tune is a bigger endorsement even if they blow a bearing or the turbo in 60k miles? Longevity and reliability would be a massive endorsement!
What are you trying to convey here. There are plenty of 3.5V6TT, 2.7V6TT from Ford out there with 100s of thousands of miles working just fine. I am not sure what the RAM will do, but I hope it does well!
@@AgonxOCwishful thinking 😅 I hope you’re right. Plenty of ford engines doesn’t mean much. I also know plenty of ford turbo engine customers with head gasket issues 😅
The RAM option establishes this inverse relationship: while you get to go faster, your mechanical reliability and durability will decrease just as fast.
I just don't understand how you guys become automotive journalist when you are so biased against Ford there's a reason why the Ford continues to be the best selling truck year after year
Sounds like ford paid him.. extra points for Ford we’re in dumb areas… Ram interiors are amazing, air suspension is fantastic, ram box is amazing! If you are consistently rowing over 8k pounds you should have a 3/4 ton.. having owned a ford and now ram, Ram is hands down the better all around truck… very few people will use the onboard power of the Ford.. My only complaint is the screen, I wish they put the Wagoneer screen in.. felt like a paid infomercial to me… ram should have won..
Good test Edmund. A couple of things: The F150 Platinum Plus is the true Ram Tungsten competitor and would equally be $90K. -There was much hoopla made over Ford's underseat storage, yet the Ram's in-floor storage was completely missed, as was its class-exclusive reclining rear seat(it also has child-seat anchors on the passenger side.) Ram still missed the extra point on tech, despite a better and cheaper self-driving feature, 24-speakee Klipsch sound system, passenger screen display, and the ability to put the map in the driver screen? Hmmmm...
@@hellkitty1014 that probably falls under the "the video can only be so long" reasoning. Also, they get the trucks available to them from the press fleet at the time. These are close enough for comparison.
Comparing the KR to the tungsten interior is dumb should’ve used a platinum plus to make it closer and if I remember the platinum offers 3year blue cruise
My 22 Platinum has Blue Cruise. I test drove a 24 and 25 RAM Limited, no hands free driving. Felt like it would have been a downgrade. Guess you have to go Tungsten to get hands free. My next truck might be a High Country since Chevrolet looks like they're sticking with the V8.
Don't know if that's true, in Fords you can have the map in a small screen or full screen. I think he was saying the RAM he was limited to a small screen.
What kind of nonsense is he saying about the monitors and the entertainment system???🧐 Ford makes it easier to use???🤬 What's this nonsense?? The system at RAM is a thousand times better and anyone interested in technology will love it😍🤩 instead of the F150's handicapped accessible system!!!🤕
I am losing my flavor for the fact they eliminated the V-8. A truck works hard or harder. V-6 Turbo is a crime, in my book. I would never buy a used trucks with these blocks. I wonder how long these engine will last under fair loads/towing. I am looking for a used, dealer cared, with extended coverage HEMI.
Truck for truck I’d take the ram for every day driving and the Ford if I needed more payload and towing. Reliability wise Ram has the worst dependability and Ford has the most recalls overall in the last year. Both are overpriced by a lot.
Domestic full-size pickup truck owners are on first name basis with the dealership service managers. They spend more time in the loaner cars than they do their trucks.
I chose a 2024 F150 xlt powerboost super crew with the longer bed and a very nice accessory package. I don't care much for overstated luxury interiors. I like a column shifter and fabric interior. I looked at Ram and Silverado. Both, nice looking trucks, but the Ford just fit me better. If I had the means, I'd own one of each just for fun. I use my trucks for recreation. They get dirty like my fingernails...
Nobody that has ever owned a Chrysler product or a Ram truck in their right mind would ever make the choice again. Talk to any independent mechanic (or even one at a Chrysler dealership) - they'll tell you to stay away. Ford consistently sets the bar and their reign won't end anytime soon....despite dodges/rams bougey interior
😂 As a 30 year Certified ASE Master Tech I can honestly say Nothing is futher than the Truth then your statement. How long have you been stuck in the 80's ? Still Rocken that Mullet?
Well just like a broken clock is correct twice a day, there's exceptions to every rule, and it sounds to me like you're a die-hard hardcore dodge fanboi that can't accept facts. Rock on sister. If you're happy with 3rd tier disposable 'trucks', have a good time!
Both of these refreshed full-size pickups were impressive, but in different ways. The Ram's interior and performance stood out, while the Ford's utility and smart cargo/bed solutions made it a true workhorse. It's rare that we end up with a comparison that's so neck-and-neck, but each truck has distinct strengths. So which camp do you fall into, team Ford or team Ram? Let us know in the comments below!
I like the ram better but I think a better comparison would be the F150 platinum vs the Ram tungsten. The king ranch f150 matches up with the ram limited longhorn.
Great overview. Last week, I drove a 2021 Ram Limited with the sea salt interior. Absolutely beautiful interior. I have been driving BMW M Sports for many, many years. The Ram 1500 Limited with the Hemi blew me away with acceleration, comfort, ride quality, low cabin noise, handling, and looks.
I am a Ford guy and I think the ram definitely has better materials etc. The tungsten trim is cool and very high quality. However I don't like the usability of the screen on the ram as opposed to the Ford. The Ford has more physical buttons which I like. And like he said the screen is more intuitive. The dash screen I prefer as well in the ford.
The front storage in the ram looks amazing. Jealous of that for sure. But that's where it ends for me.
There's no reason a truck manufacturer should require premium gas, that's insane. Ford has best of both worlds and can run 87 and 91 or 93. I'd like to see Ford with premium and how the 0-60 numbers compare then. I still think the ram would win, but atleast it would be apples to apples.
I like the features of the Ford more like the tail gate step, rear lock box under the back seat, pro power on board etc. I believe also that the rams are known for having stupid low payload ratings. Can't do a truck with only 1,000lbs of payload. That's 4 Americans and your maxed out.
If I had stupid money to spend I would get the Ford. I would build my truck exactly how I want it. Ford is king is the area as you can option your truck practically anyway you want, from gear ratio to engine etc. Plus the aftermarket support is much better. You could easily tune your ecoboost to make crazy power as it's been out for awhile. The ram is unknown at this point.
My final thought is v6s are dumb and there should be a small v8 turbo because that's badass.
As a Ram owner, your points on the camera being squeezed to the top and android auto only using the top half are 2 of my gripes. The ride quality with the 4 corner air suspension was the real selling point for me. No other full size truck comes close. As for the lack of the Hemi, Id prefer the V8 over a more complicated 6-cylinder with turbos. Look at the reliability of the Fords when they first came out. 75K people having their engines replaced and turbos replaced. When you buying a vehicle that costs as much as a small house from the 2000's, I don't want one that needs more money in repairs.
Ford has had 14 years to work those issues out so I think it's safe to buy one now
@@snozbaries7652 I would hope so, but a friend in my neighborhood has a 2022 F-150 with the 3.5L twin turbo and under 25k miles, that just spent 4 months in the shop for "carbon buildup on the valves and in the exhaust housing of the turbo". The dealership said to install a catch can to alleviate the issues, and his response was, why doesn't it come with one? Ford knows that the PCV system vapors are the cause of the issue, but due to EPA regulations (which is also driving the switch to turbo vehicles) won't allow them to install them from the factory.
@actual.actual that's right.. It's a 3.5L. Definitely my mistake. And it's the direct injection that causes the valve build up. Port injection cleans them. Direct bypasses them and goes as it indicates.. directly into the cylinder. I have a Mustang that does both, port and direct.
@@actual.actual I'm not sure of the root cause of it, maybe poor fuel that found around our area? In my neighborhood of only 20 house, all 3 F-150 owners have had this issue. One, had a 2014 that required a complete engine replacement at just 65k miles. I know it's a small sampling compared to the big picture, but when the trucks cost upwards and above 70k, it steered me away from them. Pretty much any direct injected engine without a catch-can on the PCV system is going to have build up on the valves in the long run. When I bough my 2019 Mustang GT, my dealer immediately suggested one for it, if I planned to keep it longer than a few years. Even though that engine (5.0 Gen 3 Coyote) has both direct and port injection.
@actual.actual WV. And I think most of them run 87. Which I'm sure doesn't help performance in those at all. We can get 93 at almost any station though. Do the Ecoboost F-150s require 91 or higher?
I'm going to keep my Hemi for a while. That Hurricane has lots of jam but I'm going to watch the reliability for a few years before buying one.
given it's a stellanitis product, that's not the worst idea.
@@roguedogxNot like any previous Chrysler product was any better! Ha!
@@AgonxOC i don't disagree, I'm just trying to be accurate.
It's worse than the coboost . Waaay too much boost to be reliable. Typical dodge rushing to beat Ford but screwing it up
@@fishonalbertaoutdoors9761 What a nonsensical commentary. Do you even know how much boost does a diesel pushes? I will tell you, A LOT more than these.
I love that Ram trims out the window bezel on the interior facing side of the doors. Note the visible red paint around the Ford's side windows from the interior, with the doors closed. Yuk.
My beef with the interior of the new-ish Ram's interior is that the super handy upper glove box has been replaced with a stupid touch screen. The upper box still exists on lower trim trucks, but not even an option on Longhorn or Tungsten. A no-cost "Passenger Infotainment Screen Delete" option should be available to buyers. ARGHH!!!
“Yuk” and “Argh” … maybe trucks aren’t for you
Don’t think my math is mathing, how could they both get a 8.1 score but the Ford was up in more categories?
Exactly.....😂
Don't come at them with logic bro
Because it boils down to preference. The Ram is faster, smoother and has a better interior. The Ford is better at towing. So depends on you use case. I personally hate Fords after owning a 2022, and would never go back
Premium fuel only in the Ram is a total deal breaker. That makes it insanely expensive to own and operate. What were they thinking?
An extra $50 a month instantly makes it insanely expensive (more so than the initial purchase prices already make it out to be)?
Only $50 a month, LOL you don't drive much@@ALMX5DP
If you’re spending 90k, I’m willing to bet you don’t care. I don’t know another 90k vehicle that runs 87. GM 6.2 is also 91 rated
@@golfgti47 yeah, people aren't buying a truck like that to work it. If they didn't have this, they'd have a Porsche or a high end BMW or Mercedes or something. Cruiser trucks are just the in thing now.
@@SliderFury1 exactly, they’re buying a regular tradesman with the standard output which is fine on 87
I like the look of the Ram , fit and finish are good. Seems most mechanics I speak to rate them poorly. The main reason I will stay with Ford is the aluminum body. I live in Maine where the only part of a vehicle that doesn’t rust is the tires. That is an area I can say the trucks I see rusting badly the fastest in my area are the Ram trucks. My F150 is 8 years old and I do try to take care of it , keeping it clean in the winter getting as much salt off as possible. There is Zero rust on my truck. So for me aluminum is the deciding factor.
The Ram's engine is a 3.0L, not 3.5L.
correct and more horsepower and less fuel consumption!!
I feel like the FORD is a little more iconic and has something that screams tough and built to last. The RAM is not iconic enough and is too "luxurious" for it to be a truck.
7.2 kw Pro Power Onboard is still the killer feature. Otherwise I'd choose the Ram.
Yeah, for me too. Just so many benefits of having that big of a power source.
Have to agree, my super duty has the 2Kw and it's something I thought I'd probably never use (comes standard on my trim) but already I've used it several times for power tools, charging the battery on my chainsaw, powering a big floodlight, and a big fan, etc. And that's just the 2Kw.
@@0HOON0 can't lie, Ford has a huge ace with that feature.
You can order a 2kw power for the Ram, but they didn't mention it.
@@SliderFury1I have the 2k in my F150, it has a small battery and a larger inverter, upgrade on the usual 400 watt, but not the same as the hybrids.
Outstanding review in every way. I watched five reviews on this very truck comparison. This was by far the best one. All in under twenty minuets. I subscribed, keep up the good work.
As someone who has owned both a f150 and a ram. They’re both such great trucks you basically pick what one you think looks nicer. (My pick is the ford)
I’m in this exact scenario, choosing the RAM or F150. I really like the RAM and it does ride a little better than the F150, but I kinda like that the 150 feels more like a truck. Also, I think the 150 body looks better.
Biggest negative on the Ram is Stellantis. No thank you
I have a 2019 limited f150 limited. People hate on the ram, but when I get rid of this, I will highly consider the ram. The interior is sick
Only STUPID people hate RAM!!! These are probably people who can NEVER do anything with luxury in pickups!!!
@@esan0715 lol funny hearing people picking a pickup truck by the interior not caring if it is great at doing and having what a truck is supposed to be for. I'd save my money and buy a car if all I wanted was a luxurious interior
@@fishonalbertaoutdoors9761 that's you. As for me, this does both. It does all the truck things I need, and hauls my family safer than most cars you can buy. Fortunately for me, I use my money to get what I want
@@esan0715yea the Ram is a whole other level. The new Ram not only out tows HDs, its little 3.0so smoked the ford 3.5ho up toaster hill even with the Ford making their entire body out of aluminum. I work in security and drive long distances so it's not even an option to have the lighter truck that is less of a truck in all truck capabilities.
you gotta remember FCA products are the least reliable among car manufacturers. They look good but they dont last as long as Ford is or other brands. Their heavy duty is good though. and yes I was a mopar guy but no more. Tired of their shit.
Ford’s 23mpg and regular fuel will be $75 cheaper to run every 1,000 miles, vs premium fuel and lower mpg in the Ram.
Wow! That’s a lot! Thanks for doing the math!
And rams are........a dodge...
@@camonly849 And that's what makes them great👍💪
@@tedlulis973 they rust and break 😂
@@camonly849 Wow.. Just like everything else made...Go figure....
Traded my EcoBoost on a new 25 Ram Hurricane.
Getting about the same mpg as the ford 2.7 but a hundred horses more. Very happy with the Ram.😊
lol goodluck with their engine
@@skyisdlimit6125If your knowledgeable on engines and design… you should know theoretically the best design for 6 bangers is a straight six. Not V6’s. Just a fact bud. Best design just like semi truck straight 6’s.
You failed to mention the trailer weight detection in the Ford or the CCD suspension (not available if you have the FX4). Still, with that Airstream, you (Edmunds) is advertising a dangerous scenario. That Airstream has a tongue weight around 850 lbs., your driver weighs about 200 lbs., but the truck (King Ranch) only has a payload capacity of 1300 lbs. so you can barely take another passenger but nothing else otherwise, you will be overloaded. As a 2024 King Ranch and Airstream owner, ask me how I know.
No way around it, these new twin turbo 6 cylinders are insane. Motortrend got 4.4 0-60 for the Tungsten. Im willing to bet these motor in the new charger would put it right behind the old 700hp hellcat. Any way you slice its, mid 4s 0-60 for a 3 ton gas car is absurd for a non performance oriented trim. Anyone complaining about the V8 being gone is brainless. This is coming from someone who daily drives a V8 sports car lol
Absolutely!!!! A real truck !!!
I added slotted brake rotors to my Ram 1500. Huge improvement.
What weight were you towing?
Example Airstream makes a 23 fter, 25 fter, and a 27/28 ft model. Looks like a 27 ft in test, but you don’t specify???
Would like to know please
thanks
sounds more like a ford commercial than a comparison
Can’t wait to buy tungsten
Love the V8 juice as a sizing unit.
The new Hurricane, as far as power goes, its amazing! I truly hope it’s a good engine in the long run! This in a nice sedan would be nice!
My pick is the Ram too.
Great review 👍But, what about ground clearance and 4x4 performance?
How is fuel economy not a criteria in the article. I like the ram a lot more but requiring premium for combined 17mpg is gross and that's your only powertrain choice you have with the higher trim levels.
They don't require it but I would not run the cheap crap in a high powered twin turbo motor, unless your out in bfe and its all that's available. The ford also recommends it for the power and while towing, Chevrolet 6.2 also requires 91 for the best power. It's not a huge difference for cost, most other expensive suv or sedans often require it of the same price. At what most trucks cost usually 60-75k msrp most can afford the small price difference, but in reality I don't understand how so many can afford these expensive trucks besides a business.
@@whatchis1120the high output engine does require premium gas, the standard output does not.
Shocking when it comes to the brakes. The Rams have the strongest brakes in the segment. Hmmm
Ford F150s have the highest depreciation in the quarter ton market. Ram 1500 has 55k trucks available nationwide, F150 - there are a whopping 128k trucks available for sale. These numbers are both for new trucks. Not including used. But damn. That means there is nearly 2500 new Fords in each state
Would've loved to see the F-150's lie-flat seat pitted against the Ram...
The lie-flat seat is very gimmicky; because your legs and knees still sit bent to the floor, it is never going to be as good as a bed and only marginally better then a standard seat reclined back. I have slept in it a couple times when camping in a storm, and I find I can sleep just as well with it fully flat as I can slightly reclined (with neither being as comfortable as a camping cot).
Well, the RAM guys will *pick* a *1500* and the Ford guys are *up* to buy an *F-150*
All I got from this is: if you need a pickup to do pickup things, buy the Ford. Bigger bed, higher payload, higher towing weight, on board power supply, etc.... The difference in price more than makes up for what the Ford may lack in luxury appointments that aren't really all that necessary/needed in a truck. Kinda like how you glossed over the 7kw onboard power that can power a worksite or an entire house in emergency situations during storms, power losses, etc... That alone, places it way above the Ram. Trucks work, that's what they are made for. The Ram is an overpriced luxury car wannabe that can sometimes do truck stuff.
Finally somebody said it. 👍🏻
100% you want a truck? Get a Ford.
RAM-1500 KING OF TRUCKS 👌
Username checks out
@@willkaufman363 they speak the truth regardless
@@vladblazanin136nope
Ford is the king of truck and what are you talking about?
@@RatnaRai-nm7sv king of recalls 🤣
Handling between these two close? You weren’t pushing hard enough. F150 front end feels too soft, and the rear too stiff to the point that it jitters and jumps out. Makes the front end always feel like it’s folding the tires under, just an unbalanced chassis in general. Ford also has some snafus on interior, starting with turn signal indicators in gauge cluster, they’re hard to see. Ram is the better driving truck by far. That said, with no physical oil dip stick on new Ram engine that’s a big red flag. Relying on a sensor. Sensors and electronics in general have a much higher failure rate than physical components.
Are you autocrossing your truck?
@@snozbaries7652 Lol, when the mood strikes, or opportunity presents itself, yes.
@@g.donuts3551 lol!!
@@g.donuts3551 I think the video reviews conclusion checks out though. Ford intended for their trucks to do better when loaded or towing whereas it seems the Ram excels when unloaded. It's a trade off just depending on what you prioritize.
Ram DOES NOT require premium. Look up info from their engineers on UA-cam
The HO does specify minimum 91 octane in the owners manual.
In the manual it states that it is required for the high output engine.
They fired all their engineers
The review fails to mention that premium gas is a requirement for the Hurricane HO, and optional but "recommended" for the SO Hurricane in the RAM, greatly increasing the cost of ownership.
The ram does not have independent rear suspension as you said it did
Where are you seeing this? Everything online says that it does.
@ everything? In what universe? The ram has a solid rear axle. Just like the Ford. If you think otherwise, I don't know what to tell you
Can’t wait for GM ‘s new gen 6 small block V8 to drop .
10+ years of the same GM output , i agree with you. Looking forward to a new 6.2
@@9663mu idk if it’ll be a 6.2 . Dont think GM will be having multiple V8s with different displacements anymore . No more 5.3 /6.2 . I think they’ll use a Gen 6 version of the 6.6 across the board for the light duty SUVs/trucks. Probably 450 hp/500 TQ
@@carltongray3302 the 5.3 needs to go. The 6.6 could work but how bad would that affect the MPG
@@9663mu yeah the 5.3 has ran its course . Even an updated version would only be on par with the 5.0 in the F150 power wise and that’s not enough to run with the competition now . I think a 6.6 wouldn’t be any worse than the current 6.2 on fuel . I think GM should just use a version of the L8P crate engine they just introduced . Makes 523 hp/543 TQ. A milder version for production would be perfect as it’s a true truck engine . Fully forged internals , iron block
I imagine there will be more DOHC variants along with standard or commonly opted for hybridization. That would allow smaller displacement while retaining overhead for more powerful or higher displacement units in the expensive models without sacrificing emission and fuel economy.
What a great and detailed review of both trucks. I love the style, flexibility and luxury on the RAM, but Ford does not stay back with similar qualities. Great comparison. Thank you.
Really? Did drive any truck in your life ?
So, here im a ford fan and has been for many years , but that interior of the ram i mean is nice but to me, not a mile ahead of the ford. So the interior of the ram is nicer, but the screen is much difficult to use than the ford's. I really dont think they should add the mini screen opposite the passenger on the ram, as it takes up space where the glove box resides. So there are advantages on the interior of each truck over the other. Driving, its the ram but not by a mile. Towing goes to the ford also being more stable while doing so. Exterior overall slight edge to the ram, also the engine in the ram is more powerful, but we have to wait for its reliability, as the fords v6 has been around for years. To pick one of thease great American pickups, you'd have to see which advantages one have over the other. Finally, conclusion, i love em both, i really do, but this won't take long yall, the ford's going home with me. I can also use this machine to power my home in case the electricity goes out. Great job ford and ram
Amen!
I don’t care about any of this if it doesn’t come with a V8😂😂
Yep. V8 is gonna be more reliable compared to other engine options from turbo V6 to turbo I6 to turbo I4. I honestly think the Titan had the most reliable V8 left since it doesn’t have start/stop or cylinder deactivation like the others.
1. Titan V8
2. Ford V8
3. GM V8s
Exactly!!! Them twin turbo will wear those engines out !!! Geez you can’t get a V8 on a half ton pickup!! The start of the end for these full size pickups !
@@stevenwright248thankfully GM still has two V8’s in their lineup and they’re not getting rid of the V8 for the next generation.
Good news, you can get a king ranch with a reliable 5.0, no turbo issues!
No v8 no buy.
then get a lower spec F150. you can get one of those optioned out very nicely. I feel like the top spec models just have a lot of gimmicks truck owners don't want or need.
You can option the f150 KR with a 5.0
So after 90 days Ford charges you $800 a year for blue cruise but Ram gives it to you for free for 3 years. There’s your “massive” gas cost difference for premium gas.
I’m still a America First person! F series Trucks are the Only pickups still made in America!
well if you’re an America first person then consider the ram because they are more American made than the ford F series, so is the cyber truck and the ridgeline…
@@jaivynstockdale6251 you are so full! And you don’t know what you just said!
@@melvinhunt6976 i actually do know what i said, the ram scored 43rd, meanwhile the ford scored 58th
@@jaivynstockdale6251 I will not buy a Full Size pickup made anywhere but in the USA, Period! Not as long as all F series are made HERE !
@@melvinhunt6976 well than good luck with your new cybertruck 😀
Good video but if I was going to buy a Ram which I never would but if I was going to I would not buy the first year of an all new engine especially a twin turbo engine. One thing I don't like to see is how a lot of automakers are going to subscriptions for some of there features like Toyota you have to pay for remote start monthly. I think if your vehicle comes with something you obviously already paid for it so you shouldn't have to be paid for it every month 🙂
Tell me you’re not a truck user without telling me you’re not a truck user. Lol. How fast I can drive 0-60 doesn’t matter at all. I want to be able to take myself and any gear/people places reliably and with adequate power.
I want black tungsten seats!
Just drove a 2024 limited long horn 1700 miles. Hemi e toque.
3 inch lift with 35s
12.5 miles on the high way.
Barely 300 miles on a full tank.
Will want to know if the hurricane offers better mpg than that. Because it’s so bad.
I'm a Ram 1500 man! One of the features on the Ford I don't like is that window swoop on the door. In my opinion, they need to move on from that. Again, my opinion 😊
It's there ford a reason and Ford owners like it.
4:00 not an insignificant difference.
I agree. It's night and day for MPG for each truck, and the Ford is only 0.2 second behind 0-60
@@sherylellingson3538wrong, 5.9 vs 4.7 is 1.2, that’s huge
Hybrid is a gemmic. Look at all the hybrid truck issues and how fast people are trying to unload them on the market. Speaking strictly about ETorque. Fords will soon follow. Oddly enough I see 350k mile 2.7 Eco boost engines with less issues than the 3.5 and the coyote engine. That little 2.7 is a beast and the winner with a tune!
The Ford's hybrid system is not a gimmick. It's about utility and some performance. Mpgs are minimal although better than a V8 in terms of mpgs. I have a powerboost. I used the onboard power a lot. I think the Etorque is gimmicky.
I'd gladly give up 0.2 seconds, 0-60 for 6 more MPG
They also never mention gearing
Well also you can run premium in the Ford and get more hp.
im sure you could still custom order a 5L platinum or king ranch f-150
I follow your beautiful channel and the video was distributed to my friends in the Gulf, but I need your advice. I want to buy a new vehicle. Which is better? I buy a Dodge Ram eight-cylinder or a Ford F-150 eight-cylinder.
I prefer the Ram. I would like to see Ram refresh the Hemi V8 and bring it back. I don't see that happening. It would be nice though.
I have a 2016 F-150 with the 5.0 has never been to the dealer for repairs in 130,000 miles real work miles... I have a 12 Rubicon with 136,000 mi and $18,000 in repairs...
I thought torque is what matters? So the hp ine Ram was just superior?
The f150 could do more truck stuff therefore it’s the superior truck
I love the RAM hands down. What I would never use is the "hand-free" driving mode regardless of how good it is.
I dont know of many truck buyers criteria including a 0-60. I really only care about capability, affordability, and reliability. Everyday buyers are not taking their truck to the track.
Amen, especially at 2:14 I was like what!?!? Reliability, longetivity, easy and affordable repairs would be the endorsements I’d be looking for in a truck engine
Its not about taking the truck to the track and those numbers, it's the effortless and fun driving experience that a ton of power offers. It's addictive and hard to go back from.
@vladblazanin136 I get that. I was just being hyperbolic to make a point. Still highlighting that most buyers are mainly concerned with reliability, capability, and especially affordability, considering that most of these trucks have absurd prices with crazy markups.
I'm surprised the ram out ran the Ecoboost in a 0-60 test but I feel like he needs to double check that cause last time I saw a test with the new Ecoboost hybrid was doing it in about 4.7 seconds not 5.9 I own a gen 1 Ecoboost and it moved but if you're not good with the throttle it can feel sluggish off the line at the time but if you learn it you can jump off the line quick. As far as the trucks Ecoboost is proven, ram has the worst transmissions that's just a fact, and the ford is an aluminum body so it weighs less and it goes a lot more these new hybrid Ecoboost row around 14,500 pounds the hurricane ram only tows 11,300? If I remember in that range I know it's in the 11000 range, I mean my gen 1 Ecoboost that has less power and weights more tows 12000 pounds and if you don't believe me I just towed my 13000 pound conventional pull travel trailer to the beach a couple weeks ago without any problems.oh l! Also as far as charging goes all f150s after 2015 have a full inverter in the back seat and the hybrid can power a whole job site for a guy like me who runs his own business and works with his hands. also one last thing the ram hits max torque at way higher rpm me towing my 13000 pound trailer I was doing 60 at 1700 rpm it was fine. Also those air bags are why the ram feels better on the road. I have to keep adding things I just remembered another thing the ram doesn't have a 10 speed transmission either like the Ford which is just better.
2:14 no 0-60 is not a massive endorsement of these v6 turbo engines on $80k+ trucks.
I can buy a tune for $1k and increase horsepower even more. Does this mean the tune is a bigger endorsement even if they blow a bearing or the turbo in 60k miles?
Longevity and reliability would be a massive endorsement!
What are you trying to convey here. There are plenty of 3.5V6TT, 2.7V6TT from Ford out there with 100s of thousands of miles working just fine. I am not sure what the RAM will do, but I hope it does well!
@@AgonxOCwishful thinking 😅 I hope you’re right. Plenty of ford engines doesn’t mean much. I also know plenty of ford turbo engine customers with head gasket issues 😅
The RAM option establishes this inverse relationship: while you get to go faster, your mechanical reliability and durability will decrease just as fast.
I think history will show that they both have there share of problems.
Fuel economy is not a concern for ya?
@@toyotaprius79 beat your face Prius dork.
The powerboost has been Ford’s least reliable powertrain in the F150
@@carltongray3302Least reliable powertrain in any mainstream vehicle according to Consumer Reports. Hopefully Ford has sorted this out for 2025.
I just don't understand how you guys become automotive journalist when you are so biased against Ford there's a reason why the Ford continues to be the best selling truck year after year
The Ram is nice but you’ve got to be well healed to afford it.
Sounds like ford paid him.. extra points for Ford we’re in dumb areas… Ram interiors are amazing, air suspension is fantastic, ram box is amazing! If you are consistently rowing over 8k pounds you should have a 3/4 ton.. having owned a ford and now ram, Ram is hands down the better all around truck… very few people will use the onboard power of the Ford.. My only complaint is the screen, I wish they put the Wagoneer screen in.. felt like a paid infomercial to me… ram should have won..
The Ford looks 20 years old in comparison. It legitimately looks old.
Because you are becoming older
Lol, dude is like a metro version of a truck just like these trucks. Bet he loves teslas
Good test Edmund. A couple of things: The F150 Platinum Plus is the true Ram Tungsten competitor and would equally be $90K.
-There was much hoopla made over Ford's underseat storage, yet the Ram's in-floor storage was completely missed, as was its class-exclusive reclining rear seat(it also has child-seat anchors on the passenger side.) Ram still missed the extra point on tech, despite a better and cheaper self-driving feature, 24-speakee Klipsch sound system, passenger screen display, and the ability to put the map in the driver screen? Hmmmm...
@@hellkitty1014 that probably falls under the "the video can only be so long" reasoning.
Also, they get the trucks available to them from the press fleet at the time. These are close enough for comparison.
Hands free... comma ai - one time fee and works fantastic if you have a supported vehicle.
I own both trucks and my Ford has more tech my ram has more luxury
Had the ram with 3.5 motor
Comparing the KR to the tungsten interior is dumb should’ve used a platinum plus to make it closer and if I remember the platinum offers 3year blue cruise
My 22 Platinum has Blue Cruise. I test drove a 24 and 25 RAM Limited, no hands free driving. Felt like it would have been a downgrade. Guess you have to go Tungsten to get hands free. My next truck might be a High Country since Chevrolet looks like they're sticking with the V8.
Fortunately real men can drive and back up without a damn camera
I prefer the v8, yeah the future blah blah blah. Still to have that v8 sounds is priceless. I’ll rather get a twin turbo v8.
Ill take the tried and true best truck out. The F150👍🏻 dont want an imitation of a ford
The best
The problem of Android Auto size is depending from Google, not Ram!!!!
Don't know if that's true, in Fords you can have the map in a small screen or full screen. I think he was saying the RAM he was limited to a small screen.
Recall vs. Recall
These aren’t even relatable, you are comparing a higher trim interior to a lower. The king ranch is not the highest trim and the tungsten is.
What kind of nonsense is he saying about the monitors and the entertainment system???🧐
Ford makes it easier to use???🤬 What's this nonsense?? The system at RAM is a thousand times better and anyone interested in technology will love it😍🤩 instead of the F150's handicapped accessible system!!!🤕
I am losing my flavor for the fact they eliminated the V-8. A truck works hard or harder. V-6 Turbo is a crime, in my book. I would never buy a used trucks with these blocks. I wonder how long these engine will last under fair loads/towing. I am looking for a used, dealer cared, with extended coverage HEMI.
Ram dashboard leather bubbles up…
2020 Limited still in perfect condition.
Mine didn't still was perfect when I traded it off due to the shitty 5.7 hemi. The Fords interiors are cheap hard plastic everywhere.
Now thats a biased cmoparasinon
I like Fords interior better.
Truck for truck I’d take the ram for every day driving and the Ford if I needed more payload and towing. Reliability wise Ram has the worst dependability and Ford has the most recalls overall in the last year. Both are overpriced by a lot.
I hate the Ram vertical screen. It sucks its mandatory for higher end trims
Bring a 4.0 V8 Hemi back with a turbocharger!!!!
RAM easily. The others look cheaper beside ram.
Shameless V8 sponsored! Video. That drink has too much sugar and pretends to be good, just like these overpriced trucks
I think the joke went over your head
Quiet in the peanut gallery!😂
What a douche!
If you're broke just say that...😒
GMC ultimate best truck In the market
Domestic full-size pickup truck owners are on first name basis with the dealership service managers. They spend more time in the loaner cars than they do their trucks.
The guy is paid by FORD!!! The F150 lags behind RAM in everything!!
Not really .are you another expert?
@@allanstriber5272 no, not just another expert, THE expert!!! 😂
Ram is much more luxurious and high end trucks is what you tested.
Chevy ram and gmc are going to gain Farley is cutting options motors trims etc
We see guys driving pickup trucks as commuter cars, never using them for their intended purpose. I'm guessing it gives a feeling of manliness.
I chose a 2024 F150 xlt powerboost super crew with the longer bed and a very nice accessory package. I don't care much for overstated luxury interiors. I like a column shifter and fabric interior. I looked at Ram and Silverado. Both, nice looking trucks, but the Ford just fit me better. If I had the means, I'd own one of each just for fun.
I use my trucks for recreation. They get dirty like my fingernails...
Nobody that has ever owned a Chrysler product or a Ram truck in their right mind would ever make the choice again. Talk to any independent mechanic (or even one at a Chrysler dealership) - they'll tell you to stay away. Ford consistently sets the bar and their reign won't end anytime soon....despite dodges/rams bougey interior
😂 As a 30 year Certified ASE Master Tech I can honestly say Nothing is futher than the Truth then your statement. How long have you been stuck in the 80's ? Still Rocken that Mullet?
Well just like a broken clock is correct twice a day, there's exceptions to every rule, and it sounds to me like you're a die-hard hardcore dodge fanboi that can't accept facts. Rock on sister. If you're happy with 3rd tier disposable 'trucks', have a good time!
What's funny Rams have always been absolutely shit.up till now and everyone is on the ram band wagon now.... Lmao
I see it happen almost every day