What is the "Chevron Deference?" | Potomac Watch Podcast: WSJ Opinion

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 9

  • @jamesalan455
    @jamesalan455 8 місяців тому +4

    The entire conversation is ridiculous. The left wing argues power should stay with unelected agencies. The constitution does not allow power delegation, period. If someone is an expert let them make their case. At least someone outside the agency might have a chance to argue their case

    • @DianaBrown-tx7zx
      @DianaBrown-tx7zx 3 місяці тому

      Experts are not lawyers they are the scientist Medical doctors....etc.

  • @costcontrolaccounting4613
    @costcontrolaccounting4613 8 місяців тому +2

    Federal agencies making rules aren’t rules , but law. It’s our congress who are required to make laws. Forcing a business to take on federal agents and making them pay for them is tyrannical. When I think of reducing government, I think of reducing the powers these agencies have given themselves

  • @dan7979822
    @dan7979822 7 місяців тому

    Overturn Chevron and Congress will have another reason to fall on top of the Supreme Court. It may take time, but the anger grows. It depends on whose interests and causes are getting hurt or helped.

  • @jamesalan455
    @jamesalan455 8 місяців тому

    The idiocy of the argument that a federal agency should make the policy instead of court is just wrong

  • @mylindamason6389
    @mylindamason6389 3 місяці тому

    TIMBER!!!!! MM❤