Quentin Tarantino on Alfred Hitchcock - I’m not a Hitchcock fan! I don’t like his third acts!
Вставка
- Опубліковано 20 гру 2022
- Submit your FEATURE Film Screenplay: www.outstandingscreenplays.co...
Have a short screenplay you wish to turn into a film or get feedback on from Oscar winning screenwriters? Submit it to our shorts competition: www.outstandingscreenplays.co...
Have an idea for a TV series? Have you written a TV pilot for it? Submit it to our screenplay competition:
www.outstandingscreenplays.co...
Visit our website to read screenplays of your favorite films: www.outstandingscreenplays.com/
#screenwriter #screenwriting #screenplay #quentintarantino - Фільми й анімація
Submit your FEATURE Film Screenplay: www.outstandingscreenplays.com/competitions-feature
Have
a short screenplay you wish to turn into a film or get feedback on from
Oscar winning screenwriters? Submit it to our shorts competition:
www.outstandingscreenplays.com/competitions-shorts
Have an idea for a TV series? Have you written a TV pilot for it? Submit it to our screenplay competition:
www.outstandingscreenplays.com/competitions-tv
Visit our website to read screenplays of your favorite films: www.outstandingscreenplays.com/
I appreciate that the subtitles didn't even ATTEMPT to write out that word in Hebrew 😂
lmao, he butcher it so badly 🤣
He said it wrong though
fuckalafuck
הפוך על הפוך
No body cares Never no never 😅
The way that Tarantino talks about De Palma is how De Palma talked about Hitchcock
that's what makes this so funny.
Pretty much every baby boomer director just ripped off Hitchcock,Jaws is psycho & birds,Star wars basically the 39 steps,watch Secret Agent & From Russia With Love Secret Agent pretty much 1st bond movie.David Finchers whole career is Hitchcock,Gone Girl just a remake of Marnie he even uses exact shots.
@@Matthias-sl6jr1) Art imitates art 2) Structural similarities doesn't equal "ripped off" 3) All of your comparisons are superficial 4) Marnie and Gone Girl have radically different stories, though I give u Tippi shares some qualities with Amy.
@@DoctorJammer Marnie & Gone Girl both about sociopath calculating women story was tweaked a bit,but you saw the part about exact shots right opening shot of Gone Girl where she has his head on her lap exact shots in Marnie same situation Connery basically expresses Afflecks inner monologue.
@@Matthias-sl6jrcan u without spoilers tell me how that influenced Star Wars?
For anyone wondering what the Hays Code is like I was,
“The Hays Code was this self-imposed industry set of guidelines for all the motion pictures that were released between 1934 and 1968,” says O'Brien. “The code prohibited profanity, suggestive nudity, graphic or realistic violence, sexual persuasions and rape."
Pretty much spawned the B movie genre.
Yet Kubrick managed to make masterpieces during those years.
@@geneberrocal3220Very true, Kubrick had a very different style in the 50s with ‘Paths of Glory’, ‘Lolita’ and ‘Dr Strangelove’ - very strong themes in all but didn’t have the detained depictions of violence Hitchcock inspired
@@geneberrocal3220 Creativity often flourishes with constraint, but this is mostly limited to structure and not content. What I mean is, when those constraints flat-out disallow the depiction of things that happen in the world, the artist isn't even able to decide which aspects work best when exercising restraint. The Hays code was a travesty that set film as a medium back. Thankfully, artists like Hitchcock were intelligent enough to subvert it so the Renaissance of the 70s was possible.
I feel like what Tarantino is talking about has to be the violence right? Possibly the nudity but most likely the violence.
The "Man from the South" episode from "Alfred Hitchcock Presents" inspired a scene in QT's "The Man from Hollywood" segment from "Four Rooms" in 1995
That episode was an adaptation of a Roald Dahl short story, also titled "The Man from the south"
@@lucalapaglia3941 and indeed got *another* adaptation in Roald Dahl's own TV version of Tales of the Unexpected
I really should read more comments before I post. I just typed a looong description of the same. 😆
I totally thought he was going to mention the end of North by Northwest, where he was told to edit the end of the film cause to unmarried characters got in bed together in a room on a train. He changed the ending to them kissing, then the woman being thrown down on the bed. and the lights cutting off, and then cut to a train tunnel, that after a few seconds, a very round train only slightly smaller than the tunnel, penetrates the opening of the tunnel at high speed.
I like “North By Northwest.” The dust cropper scene is intense!
Great movie!!
The ending was an example of Hitchcock sticking it to the censors. The sensors wanted no pretense of Cary Grant and Eva Marie Saint sleeping together on a train. So, Hitchcock showed the train entering a tunnel
So what he's saying is, he likes hitchcock but the fact that the hays code was involved hindered the content too much for his liking and ruined it for him
Basically yes which is completely understandable. Hitchcock was so severely limited by what he could do at the time and it’s a shame
That makes Hitchcock even more of a genius. I don't think that sexual content or graphic violence makes a film better, though. People are attracted to the lowest common denominator,.and a capable director can circumnavigate that with ease by giving them what they don't want or expect.
Which means he doesn’t understand Hitchcock. Tarantino isn’t a very smart man.
Movies like Psycho did not need to be extra graphic or anything. Are there loads of movies that would be worse off if they were held back? Obviously. But Hitchcock movies are completely fine the way that they are.
Hitchcock is far, far, far, far, far, far greater than Tarantino could ever dream of being.
This is one of the few times while I have no arguments with his professional opinion Hitchcock was definitely limited by his time and he was around today he would make things that make most of us vomit and piss
Like The Human Centipede?
Hitchcock actually believed it was what you didn’t see that was important. Tarantino is 100% wrong here.
@@FirstNameLastName-wt5toNope he's actually right have you not watched Hitchcock film Frenzy made in the 70s has one of the most disturbing assaults and kill in a film. Hitchcock definitely was about suspense but didn't want shy away from violence either.
@@supoa9489 Tarantino is a sadistic sociopath. Hitchcock would not have ever risen to that level. Tarantino is seeking validation for his behavior here.
@@FirstNameLastName-wt5to Your moving the goalpost now, I never said anything like that. My whole point, his films would've been quite violent have you seen any of his pre-hays code films. Hitchcock was about suspense, but was never shy about inclusion of violence heck Psycho was meant to show more but cenors fought him to tooth and nail to keep it subdued.
I love Alfred Hitchcock Presents . Dude was legit funny af in his monologues at the beginning and end of each episode
Same, I always loved when it would start and he’d say “Good evening”
Hitchcocks humour was subtle and incredibly well timed. Tarantinos humour seems to rely on dialogue and improbable situations.
Tarantino absolutely worships the 70s lol
rightly so.
Great era of movies.
The 70's were the most gaudy, superficial, gauche decade of all. And it was the decade of my teens. Poor me.
Maybe the best decade of films ever
@@mikekock927I think the 90s were the best decade. Shawshank Redemption, Forrest Gump, Pulp Fiction, Goodfellas, Fight Club, Green Mile, Saving Private Ryan.
He's right about Hitchcock being limited, but even more than the Hays code. I was on a tour of Paramount, and they showed us where Hitchcock cut a massive hole in the floor of one of the stages, when he was told not to, but he wanted to get a certain shot of traffic. The studio then put him in a certain office in order to keep an eye him.
what's hays code?
@@smann7236 imagine trying to google something, I could never...
@@smann7236 the Movie Version of the Comics Code, and equally nefarious.
@@smann7236 it’s an unwritten rule in old Hollywood days that under no circumstances can you show stacks of hay outside of stables. Hitchcock even said in an old interview that he often felt that his films were missing hay so I think Tarantino has a point here.
@@BBD-AITB lmao
Strangers on a Train! Favourite Hitchcock movie, still holds up
I pick Hitchcock movies over Tarantinos ANYDAY!
All day, everyday!
To each their own. I’d watch Tarantinos worst film over Hitchcocks best any day.
They’re very different, it’s an unfair comparison
@@yaseenpannu1207Wow
@@pennywiseetc3020but they both have one thing in common: suspense.
Each to there own. That’s what conversations are for.
I'm not Jewish but I was hoping this Super-Goy was mispronouncing the Hebrew phrase! Hooray
A film by Hitchcock where the 3rd act actually ist the most suspenseful is „Notorious“. I wonder if there was a significantly different ending originally planned.
Topaz was saved by the 3rd act,1st half of that movies all over the place get the feeling Hitchcocks trying to be french director,all comes together in 3rd act.
Here is where I disagree with QT. He needs to understand that Hitchcock who was limited by the Hays Code was also the most influential filmmaker that the directors who QT loves ALL got their inspiration and understanding of cinema from. Without Hitchcock there would not be that next generation of filmmakers that QT grew up with and subsequently shaped him.
He prefers Brian de Palma who really paid direct homage to Hitchcock
He was right that the Hays Code held Hitchcock back. If you watch the Glass Eye or Psycho that is very evident. Would have been amazing to see Hitchcock's prime works made later on
@@joedorben3504 his later films are more graphic but not as good. The Hays Code had some positives because it forced directors to shot certain scenes in a more subtle way, like the shower scene in Psycho
Yeah I agree. It was a different time back then, very different and Hitchcock was probably the most unique Director at the time. I mean even today, he’s still up there with the greatest in the arts.
you believe tarantino, respects that? he actually believes his own dialogues are superb
The way he said it.. If you spoke Hebrew you’d be pissing your pants laughing 😂
Even without speaking it I knew it didn't sound right
what’s the word? curious
Yes, what is the correct phrase?
What he said came up with "poke poke" in Google translate.
@@petervoskuil2256hafuk al hafuk
Fook à la fook? Da fook 😂
חזק, חיפשתי את זה
Hafookh Hal Hafookh
הפוך על הפוך
"Backwards logic" from Google Translate.
Needed to please his masters.
As good as QT is, he’s no Hitchcock!
EXACTLY!!!
He's not even at De Palmas level 😉
@@Devilsblood You're not wrong about that pal!! I feel like De Palma is still an underrated director somehow. He's brilliant.
@charold3 not even close, but Tarantino is clearly a legend in his own mind.
@@lewstone5430 Ha. Yes. He’s good and knows it. But, hell, I’ll be excited as anyone to see his next (final?) film.
For someone who is not a Hitchcock fan he spoke glowingly of him and his work. That is true class.
In an early Tarantino movie (can't remember the name though) It was a comedic series of vignettes set in a Hotel in NY. Each story started with a request for the bell boy (Tim Roth). He would go to the room and mayhem would ensue. The last story was taken from an episode of Alfred Hitchcock Presents. A man meets a strange gambler who talks him into a bet. The gambler bet that if the man could light his lighter successfully ten times in a row he would give the man his sports car. But if he lost, he must allow the gambler to chop off his pinky finger. Both versions were great.
The movie is called Four Rooms
I love Tarantino the way he just said that made it very crystal clear and I love Hitchcock too but I can imagine😊 a magnified Hitchcock in the 70s wow
I think its funny cos he loves Depalma and hes the most Hitchcockian director ever.
Tarantino couldn’t lace Hitchcock’s boots.
What exactly was in the end of the this movie, what “reversed” the Hays code? I didn’t get that
Google it. If you were a true film fan, you would already know. The Hayes code basically prevented explicit displays of sex or violence in films prior to the 1970s. Although, the code itself started to break down in the 1960s. Alfred Hitchcock's Psycho was very groundbreaking in that respect. Also his subsequent films push the envelope more than before.
@@t5396 I do know about the Hayes code, but I didn’t get what exactly Quentin was talking about when he mentioned one of Hitchcock movies since I haven’t seen this movie before. Tarantino mentioned that this movie “reversed” the Hays code, but it’s not obvious from the clip how exactly this movie did that
@@t5396 Jump into a meat grinder
@@t5396 lmao get over yourself you insecure little gatekeeper
@@ivanbryukhov He basically goes on to say that they couldn’t portray the star as the bad guy who wanted to kill her, and the “double reverse” is Tarantino believing oh, okay, they can’t do that because of the Hays code, but then at the end he looks at her a certain way that basically confirms really subtlety that she was right to suspect him and he’s going to kill her.
Thing that’s different about Hitchcock is, he builds suspense. Each moment something brewing, and it’s a bad omen. So when it lands, it feels way more impactful.
I mean come on, Psycho, The Birds, Vertigo, Rear Window. They all have great third acts. Their probably some of his most best films ever made.
Hitchcock was better than Tarrintinto. The Hays code just proves how amazing he was with all the restrictions. I feel like tarrintino is the opposite and clings on to violence way too much even though he has some great films himself, Hitchcock had timeless masterpieces like Psycho, Rear Window, Vertigo, North by Northwest, etc.
Ever seen Secret Agent compare that to From Russia With Love pretty much invented James Bond and spy thriller to.
I can plainly see why Tarantino would not hold Htchcock in high regard. Hitchcock was 90% Visual and 10% screenplay. For Tarantino it is the other way around. His films have cool visuals of course, but Hitchcock had a formula. Hitchcokc nver looked through the viewfinder on any of his films. He knew precisely what was in the frame of every shot.
I mean I agree on some things, I don’t love everything Hitchcock did, but he had his masterpieces. But it’s funny Tarantino talking petering out in the third act, that’s literally how I’ve felt about the last few of his films lol
I find it funny too, the problem that I find with his films is that you know always how is gonna end, you already know there's gonna be a a bloodbath in his third act, no matter what. I blame jackie brown for that, after his fans didn't like it and demanded a new pulp fiction ish kinda film, he got stuck with that. I can't be surprised anymore
@@bueugee 100% thats his go too to wrap up the films, which don’t get me wrong it can be entertaining and has its moments when it fits. But he just uses the same trick over and over, and we’ve seen enough of it. That’s why when I was watching Once Upon A Time... for the first time, during the first two thirds of the film, I was like “oh shit! He’s actually doing something different this time!” It felt like he was trying out something different from his standard (which reading reviews when it came out, a lot of people didn’t like the first two acts because they weren’t typical-I guess I live in a different world lol), but then you get to act three and boom, here comes the predictable bloodbath. The first time I absolutely hated the ending, not anything to do with it changing history, it just didn’t fit to me. The few times I’ve watched since, I haven’t minded it as much, but it just feels lazy. He didn’t know what to do, so I’ll add a frenzy of violence to wrap it up so people get their classic “Tarantino fill.” Just felt lazy. Also, if you think about it, there’s no real point to the Charles Manson back drop in that film, but that’s a different matter. But you’re right, I think after the lackluster reception of Jackie Brown, he figured he’ll just go with what he knows and sells.
But it is in Hitchcock most popular movies. Psycho didn't need that long exposition scene, she didn't had to die in vertigo, Rear window ending felt rushed.
Tarantino would wish he were half as good a filmmaker as Hitchcock was.
His comment is noted but come on.. This is like Charlie zelenoff saying he’s not a fan of Floyd Mayweather
I often feel like if a great filmmaker’s movie is not good, it’s almost not the filmmaker’s fault. It’s almost always the higher ups and money people that ruin it.
Frenzy is the real Hitchcock. Really nasty and it's a British film. I think the British studio system let its most famous returning son do just what he wanted.
I agree Hitch was the greatest!
I don't know, older films like Shadow of a Doubt were also pretty nasty for the year they were made
If he doesn't like Hitcock's 3rd act, what does he think of M Knight Shammalammadingdong?
🤣🤣🤣
Topaz completely saved by 3rd act,was unimpressed with that movie till they get to France.
Everyone remember it’s just an opinion, he never insults Hitchcock whatsoever 😅
tarantino could not be able to make a film as good as hitchcock's best 3, ever
I think ROPE ended perfectly
@@Ashamed.Loser69Jimmy Stewart caught the two young homicidal weirdos.
@@JT-rx1eo Aha, great still don't remember it.😅 But I remember how Shadow of a Doubt ended.🤷🏻♂😇
Not him calling the father of film “a clever little bugger”
Says the most overrated filmmaker of the 20th century
Full clip?
I recently saw Rebecca and enjoyed it; I think my personal Hitchcock “taste” are his thrillers- Vertigo, Noeth by Norhwest compared to his horror- Psycho and The Birds.
Tough question for QT. Which Hitch? The Master of Suspense had a very long career. The 3rd act of Rear Window pretty strong. I’m a Jackie Brown QT fan.
Now I know what a double ice backfire is in Hebrew
That’s a total contradiction. Hitchcock wasn’t allowed to fully express himself as a director in the time he was making movies - furthermore, he pushed the limits as much as he could. QT acknowledges this, yet says he was not a fan 🤷🏻♂️
Have another LINE Quentin.
They should bring back the hays code.
I love Tarantino, but I don’t think it’s fair to fault a director for working within the standards of a particular time in which they were living. The genius of Hitchcock was that he was able to make movies as good as they were in spite of moralistic limitations imposed upon him.
When it comes to Vertigo that was my initial reaction but it usually allows to think and contemplate on he ending of third act, when Madeline falls off the tower at the end its ironic if anything because she pretended to commit suicide several times while trying to trick Scotty.
Tarantino couldn’t see Hitchcocks talent if he had the Hubble telescope. Hack.
I’m clearly the only person here who hadn’t a clue what the Hays code is, off to do some ‘research’ now
Basically it was a restrictive code for nudity and violence pre PG, R and X ratings. The world was very socially conservative back then when it came to any type of media.
@@FacheChanteDeux thank you 🙏
This is like if I gave an interview talking about the failures of Beethoven, in the context of my own creations.
Hitchcock definitely got around the Hays Code with Psycho. As much as I love his works with Cary Grant & Grace Kelly, I think that The Birds and Psycho may have been his best films. The suspense and fear he created in those movies definitely got under your skin.
Rear window is definitely my favourite
Amd with Rope!
On the contrary I felt like the Hays Code really fucked up Psycho. The shower murder scene deserved to be much more graphic and horrifying to watch, and when Norman stabs the detective guy in the head that should have been much more graphic too. The way Janet Leigh acts in the shower scene was weird too, presumably she was forced to do so due to the fact that the Hays Code would prohibit them from showing any of her body below the shoulders. Not that I needed to see her nudity, but would have liked the murders in this film to be as graphic and horrifying as they should be. Leigh does a good job making up for that with her screams and whatnot, and Hitchcock did the very best he possibly could with the circumstances, but I still wanted more out of that tbh
I think just the opposite: while The Birds and Psycho were good, his earlier films like Vertigo, Rear Window, North by Northwest and Strangers on a Train were better.
This would resonate more if Tarantino weren't a plagiator and a one trick pony.
I don't agree with plagiator, to an extent every director kinda is, but I can't agree enough with the one trick pony
And a has-been, and a foot fetishist.
100 percent right!!!!
@@bueugeethe thing about Tarantino is he takes dialogue and scenes right out of films compared to just paying homage to them with a quick little Easter egg
Well, I have seen the film and I thought that was more of an affectionate gesture than a murderous one. I mean there were no other cues to prove that.
I love how this guy would defend many controversed aspects of movies (explicit violence or language, bad taste, etc.) and would fight to the death anyone who is willing to fight with him... and yet, when peacefully asked for his opinion, states his opinion and right away says "but this is just my opinion". He's not going to fight about this, he's not where the interviewer expected him but it's just an opinion, there's no big deal about it.
Also, he's right and has a fine analysis, I think. :) but that little "but, this is just my opinion..." was elegant and humble. I like this dude.
Not a fan but, took a page out of Hitchcock's book by doing cameos in his own movies. I don't believe this at all. Just like I don't believe Lady Gaga's inspiration was Whitney Houston and not Madonna. It's jealousy of genius and originality.
Not sure why people are attacking him for his opinion. It’s not like he was talking shit or anything. He was asked for his opinion, and he gave it.
Explains why he was so rude to Hitchcock in their rap battle.
A reverse UNO.
He doesn't like Hitchcock's third acts while I don't like his (tarantino's) first second or third acts. (I don't like his movies)
I agree with Tarantino.
The manufacturing of self-expertness
This must be a reference to Stephen Spielberg vs Alfred Hitchcock
weird
What's that phrase?
"Hafuch al hafuch" tarantino is pronouncing it wrong.
Something he picked up as Harvey Weinstein Shabbo-Goy
I am sorry but Mr. Tarantino... you are WRONG SIR. you DO NOT collect $200, you DO NOT PASS GO!!!!!!!!! HITCHCOCK IS THE GREATEST FILMMAKER OF ALL TIME AND QUENTIN CANNOT HOLD A CANDLE TO ALFRED!!!!! GOOD DAY SIR!!!!
Relax there Tiffany lol
Tarantinos last two movies SUUUUUUUUCKED! Everything else he’s basically stolen from others. And I like his movies a lot but don’t come for Hitchcock
Interesting how Tarantino didn’t choose Vertigo or Anatomy of Murder or M for Murder or Psycho
I was going to say he was held back but he said it. They were not aloud to do a lot back then because it would be considered immoral.
"Not a fan" but definitely a student of his films. Quentin is no fool and learns from everything he watches and sees.
I love Tarantino movies, but whenever i hear him criticizing Hitchcock or Kubrick, it's like a fry cook at McDonald's criticizing the master chef at the Waldorf Astoria.
TIL about the hays code
What's wrong with the 3rd acts? Not enough feet for ya Quentin?
The Thirty Nine Steps is a better film than any Tarantino movie.
Tarantino is so very wrong. Hitchcock believed the suspense was created by what wasn’t seen/known. Tarantino is just a narcissist who thinks everyone thinks like him.
You clearly not understanding saying Hitchcock was restricted by cenorship, Psycho one few few movies he was fought to be intact.
@@supoa9489 Fighting censorship doesn’t mean he would’ve risen to Tarantino’s level of sadistic depravity. Tarantino is desperately seeking validation by writing history how he sees it.
@@FirstNameLastName-wt5to why the fuck would Tarantino be seeking validation at the far latter end of a wildly successful career? You and that Anthony Gudgeon guy are all over this thread like Hitchcock is your dad or something
@@Spikeelsucko Because narcissists are driven by the need for validation. They need external validation as they are incapable of self validation.
I’m not a Tarantino fan. He seems like he’d be really weird in his personal life.
הפוך על הפוך!
Savvy cineaste though he is, he doesn't get Hitchcock. Hitch's greatness as a storyteller and artist was not inhibited by any censorship codes. The Tarantino who made Reservoir Dogs, Pulp Fiction, Jackie Brown and the opening scene of Inglorious Basterds would understand that point. QT the restless provocateur behind the Kill Bill movies and various other attempts at reproducing grisly B-movie sensationalism would not.
Hay's code?
Hitchcock thousand times better than Tarrantino
Sigh. I'm going to say it. Tarantino is not the greatest director of all time. I'll take Hitchcock anyday. Fincher, scorsese and nolan are also better than Tarantino too
Tarantino saying any filmmaker has a third act problem is laughable, everything he’s made post Jackie Brown needs serious editing.
Hitchcock was a product of his time. when de Palma did oppression, in 1976 that was basically a remake of vertigo it wasn't as good as vertigo.
Now we can allow him to attack Steven the hack
So based on what he said he's biased?
1:00
Isn’t Hitchcock one of the people who first broke the hays code with psycho? Or am I wrong in saying that
Don't know if this one was banned for breaking the hays code or not, but I know Salt of the Earth (1954) was one of the only films in America to be completely blacklisted.
Midnight cowboy came out in the late 60s so we know Hollywood was doing away with the hays code by that time.
@@Devilsblood The Hays code was fully abolished in 1968. Bonnie and Clyde (super controversial for all the violence and sexuality in it) was released in 1967, which was pretty much the movie that killed the Hays code.
B movies dirctor is not a hitchcock fan, good for you
I don't know why but hearing the word 'Bugger' in an American accent is weird.
Tarantino ripped off Hitchcock but hates em what a weasel
“Not a fan” doesn’t equal hatreed
@@Ryan07_20 Tarantino is a weasel
@Ryan07_20 they have that commenter mindset where there is no middle ground, you are one extreme or the other.
The Hays code arguably forced some innovation rather than in your face Tarantino blood bath nonsense. In 100 years people will remember Hitchcock more than Uber nerd Quentin. Form is temporary, class is permanent as they say.
Hitcock still a genius
Hitchcock over This dude anyway and anyway
Y bien que lo tributea, no digo plagia, pero hace guiños a sus movies. O sea ya sabemos que replica escenas de otras movies. Y pues también de Hitchcock.
No problem
He doesn’t like Hitch because he’ll never be able to hold a candle to his canon of work! Tarantino has what, nine films, a couple great, a few mediocre, a couple real crap!
Hitchcock had fifty-three, at least twenty classics, plus he produced a groundbreaking television series at the true dawn of the medium!
Jealous maybe?
QT covets fame, recognition and praise. His envy is obvious. He wants to be known as the “aficionados aficionado”-but, he can’t stand being outgunned by a greater artiste!
He’d do better by not saying anything at all about the master director and creative force Hitchcock truly was!
Quentin Tarantino is one of the most overrated directors of all time. In my opinion His movies are a mess and don't flow I think people pretend to like Tarantino because they want to be considered edgy and different a lot of times the stories are terrible and unrealistic and hard to follow
Wonder if Hitchcock would have liked Tarantino films if theyd dabbled in hays code
I, on the other hand, would prefer to view the actual video.
You mean
הפוך על הפוך