would I be right to assume that the 'Doctrine of Allurement' is the equivalent of 'attractive nuisance' in American law? In any case, wonderful job. Love your videos, the fact that I'm a law student in the states notwithstanding.
Hello sir thanks for your lecture for OLA in your video OLA 57 in defences on slide it says s2 b while you saying s 2 a and you citing all cases a verses b while my law tutor told me v is for and never say verses
Is this transferable to degree level? Or is it more simplistic for A level? I have an occupiers liability’s question and these videos are teaching me a lot
Thank you for replying. Yes, I assumed it would still be applicable, I just wanted to double check. These have been the most thorough videos on this topic I have found on UA-cam, I really appreciate them
Hi there. Would this still be relevant if someone built an extension on their house and part of the trench they needed to build extended on to a public footpath (leading to an injury) ?
You are welcome - and no such thing as crazy horses (well not unless you are an Osmond of course - you may be too young to get that reference) only crazy people :-)
The best law explaining videos in UA-cam
Yes the doctrine of allurement and attractive nuisance are essentially the same thing. And thank you for your endorsement
Thank you for your contribution kind gentleman.
would I be right to assume that the 'Doctrine of Allurement' is the equivalent of 'attractive nuisance' in American law? In any case, wonderful job. Love your videos, the fact that I'm a law student in the states notwithstanding.
Very nice , thanks for your time for public .
Hi sir, what would the criticisms of this act be
Very well explained!!
If someone owns a boat does that come under the act
Can you make your sound louder pls, I listen when I am doing cooking and yard, I am time poor, thanks
Do these videos apply to university students?
Hello sir thanks for your lecture for OLA in your video OLA 57 in defences on slide it says s2 b while you saying s 2 a and you citing all cases a verses b while my law tutor told me v is for and never say verses
Is this transferable to degree level? Or is it more simplistic for A level? I have an occupiers liability’s question and these videos are teaching me a lot
The law is the same. I guess it depends on the level of detail
Thank you for replying. Yes, I assumed it would still be applicable, I just wanted to double check. These have been the most thorough videos on this topic I have found on UA-cam, I really appreciate them
Hi there. Would this still be relevant if someone built an extension on their house and part of the trench they needed to build extended on to a public footpath (leading to an injury) ?
iam a law teacher in kenya ca you recommend more resources for me
You are welcome - and no such thing as crazy horses (well not unless you are an Osmond of course - you may be too young to get that reference) only crazy people :-)