THIS IS SUCH A GREAT HELP! THANK YOU! Would it be possible for you to do nuisance (private and public) , negligence (medical and normal) psychiatric injury, product liability, vicarious liability and rylands v fletcher please?
Apologies if this has changed since the making of this video (and that change has gone unnoticed by me) but I believe at 1:50 in the video where you give the standard of care required in the 57 statue, this is actually to be found in S2(2) rather than S2(1) as stated in the video. Just thought I'd point that out in case anyone was a bit confused like me!!
Does this apply if a pedestrian is walking along a public footpath adjacent to a building site and is then struck by a structure e.g scaffolding, fencing, hoarding etc ? Would the pedestrian be considered a (lawful) visitor?
I have an exam tomorrow and the you have explained this will help no end. Thank You 😊
I like to visit "The Law Bank" video for learning law subjects.
Thank you Jay
This is fantastic. Thank you very much!
Glad you liked it!
Excellent lecture
THIS IS SUCH A GREAT HELP! THANK YOU! Would it be possible for you to do nuisance (private and public) , negligence (medical and normal) psychiatric injury, product liability, vicarious liability and rylands v fletcher please?
Thank you so much for the great upload, really clear in explanation!
Apologies if this has changed since the making of this video (and that change has gone unnoticed by me) but I believe at 1:50 in the video where you give the standard of care required in the 57 statue, this is actually to be found in S2(2) rather than S2(1) as stated in the video. Just thought I'd point that out in case anyone was a bit confused like me!!
Thank you for your feedback. We are currently working on updating all our content. Please subscribe to get notifications on the latest updates.
amazing lecture
Fantastic! Thank you.
This video is great, well explained.
You are welcome
Very informative lecture thanks for sharing
So nice of you
Well explained
This s good ...I like ...thanks lot
Do we need to apply 'but for' test in occupier's liability?
can you provide a link to the notes. The video is so helpful thank you so much.
great video... have you stop making videos? these videos are old but good Tho
Does this apply if a pedestrian is walking along a public footpath adjacent to a building site and is then struck by a structure e.g scaffolding, fencing, hoarding etc ? Would the pedestrian be considered a (lawful) visitor?