Electric Field Due to a Ring of Charge, Linear Charge Density, Physics Practice Problems
Вставка
- Опубліковано 7 жов 2024
- This physics video tutorial explains how to calculate the electric field of a ring of charge. It explains why the y components of the electric field cancels and how to calculate the linear charge density given the total charge of the ring, the radius, and the distance between the center of the ring and a point P that lies on the x axis perpendicular to the surface of the ring. This video contains plenty of examples and practice problems.
Final Exams and Video Playlists: www.video-tutor.net/
The book was complicated and demotivating, why is this so much simpler? Great video as always, my friend you are a saint.
I been struggling with this section. My teacher makes it, so complicated and sometimes frustrating the way he explains it. Thank you, very much.
you are the best!!!! noone could make physics interesting to me, but with you İ can study without getting bored. and you have the most precious voice İ have ever heard))))
Good one.
It is just so surprising how this teacher of ours is called the Organic Chemistry Tutor and he is teaching a wide range of stuff ; Math,Physics....
Thank teach you are a blessing
I'm in my second year in physics and i like your videos A LOT!! also we share it between us to understand our topics and have examples on it. thank you very much teacher!!!
bro your voice make us calm and this is the reason why we learn !!! god save you for us
You are such a positive influence on STEM education in the 21st century that I genuinely believe you should have your own Wikipedia page.
This reduces my stress by 99%. I am doing this topic right now but in chinese. So complicated that I can't understand what my professor is teaching us. Thanks man, this is great video for me 👍👍👍👍
You sir are saving lives,literally.Keep at what you are doing please👏🏻
I read this material from my book for like 3 hrs and yet didnt understand until this video, so thanks dude
I'm always thankful for this person and I will always be. THANK YOU
Really helpful, thanks so much! You helped my avoid a frustrating night
You are a life saver thank you for simplifying this concept
You are always there when we need you, be blessed, bro
Thank you so much, this is so much easier to understand than the way my professor explains it. You're a real life saver
this man out here carrying all of our careers
i love it you always help us so much may you be blessed so much
My professor spent two weeks on this and I still didnt get it, one night after sleeping on this video and I can do the super hard problems my professor gives us. My professor teaches a super basic level understanding of the topics and then expects us to solve super complex problems. This video literally is saving me on my midterm cause this is the only topic I was struggling with in physics 2
Thank you for providing such lessons that are very comprehensible and full of necessary contents.
You are amazing. You teach chemisty and physics, both difficult subjects :)
Thank you mister ... it was way simpler than the book
A savior to students for sure!
wow , your effort is really significant to my success in physics course.
best yt channel ever
.....
thank you sir you're light for me in this dark life where i cant understand physics from teachers other than you😪
this is way nicer than the line of charge problem, atleast you dont have to do a crazy trigometric subsitution
Thank you
From kenya🇰🇪🇰🇪
Clearest explanation
I love this tutor ❤❤❤
so so so thankful for this!! Thank you so much
Thanks bro you the real MVP
all hail the triangle, the shape that simplifies our physics and makes our lives bearable
omg first one is pretty much one of my homework questions due soon
god bless u man thank u for all lecture videos
W mans. Bro never fails
youre truly a life saver
Oh My! Thanks for the good classes! Big hug from Brazil
bro u r a life saver.....thanks
Thank you so much man you really help a lot
Thank you so much, sir, for making it easy for us. (Y)
thank u soooooooooooooooooooo much dude. just genius
Thank you once again.
Wow ... this is so much simpler
Awesome! Helpful tutorial
you the best xem. god bless you
You are a legend....thanks⭐
Youre saving my degree again
wow, this is very helpful
Thanks for the save, Like Always♥️
thank you this really helped me
Thanks alot
U R GREAT
you are amazing!! Thank you for exist;)
Nice Class
A thin circular ring, of radius 20cm, is charged, with a uniform charge density(rho). If a small section, of 1cm length, is removed from the ring. Calculate the electric field intensity at the center of the ring.
helped a lot thanks :)
thank you
💯💯💯💯 life saverr
I love you Bro❤️
That's help me soo much but I have question in the Last equation we got if x=0,x>>0, x
Thanks
you are the best
Thank you!!!
thanks a lot bro!!!!
Thank you so much .
How is this different from the one with the formula of the denominator raised to 3/2……?
Thank you so much
Thanks a lot
One thing I never understood is why is λ ds = dQ. If λ is already the amount of charge per unit of length, why do we need to multiply it by ds?
Thanks man
كفو يالزلم 👍🏻
But.. didn't we ignore the "+c" for the indefinite integral? Was it somehow definite, did I miss it? Did we say from 0 to Q or something like that?
You're correct. No definite integral was taken therefore some constant c should come into the picture. We can then determine c by substituting E=0 when Q=0, which gives us c=0. Note that after indefinite integration, we get E as a function of Q i.e E = f(Q) + c.
Another way of doing this is to look at an indefinite integral as always being a sum of all infinitesimal parts when applied to a given situation. In this case, we do not need to use definite integral since we know the integral of small E i.e. dE in this situation is the sum of all dEs over the cirumference and the integral of dQ is the sum of all dQs over the cirumference, which is clearly E (net electric field) and Q (total charge on ring) respectively. So, either use definite integral or indefinite integral sum approach.
thanks!
Sir I love you 😔
Təşəkkürlər
thank u
I don't know why R doesn't change?? I understand that R is in terms of a and x which they are constant; However, if dq will be in another position on the ring, u will not have a right triangle to use the Pythagorean theorem to find R in terms of X and a; therefore, R is not constant. Please correct me. Thank you.
No matter where you draw the line from the ring to point p R will be the same value.
I figured it out after looking at it again, the problem was that i was looking at it in 2 dimension. However, in a 3 dimension space, the point P is above the circle which will give a right triangle in all cases. It was just a issue of imagination lol
Haha I was struggling with the calculus portion of this too. Cheers mate
Good luck man :)
Thanks u too
I love it
love you
this is the problem with our society, the video that has a lot of informative and useful content has only a few thousand views, but a video of bear climbing mountain has millions of views.what do you think.??
How can we prove using math, and not symmetry, that the y-components are add up to zero? Can we take the integral of dE_y from 0 to 2πα or we must calculate two or more integrals because the sign of the y-component is changing?
Please when is E=p/£and when is it p/£.
Where E= Electric field
P= charge density
£= permittivity of free space.
How is R a constant? 7:00 - the logic here does not make sense
Yep I did not get it as well
Because the distance from any point of the ring to the point where we are finding the electric field won't change that's why R is a constant
@@clioosesli4646 but that is simply not true… take, for example, the left most point on the ring vs the right most point on the ring. the distance from each of those points to the point of interest is different
@@alexsafayan7684 how ?
Okay it's a ring right?
Okay just take a ring shaped bangle or anything and a wooden stick or a pen then pass it through the centre of the ring then you will see that no matter it's from the right left or top bottom or any point the distance is same
@@clioosesli4646 Oh wow, I think I've been interpreting this as a 2D problem, when in reality, the ring is "facing" the point of interest, correct?
❤
adam ya adam
anyone who knows his name?
Why isn’t the linear charge density inserted before integrating?
You could do that also and still you will get the same answer. In place of dQ you would use charge per unit length X dl where dl is an infinitesimal length along the circumference. You would then get E net in terms of linear charge density.
@@sunildhaul2397 How is this different from the one with the formula of the denominator raised to 3/2……?
@@daniellaughoc4003 , it will ultimately give the same end result except that now your final formula obtained after integration would be having linear charge density in it.
I don't understand why he didn't integrate directly dE?
@@sunildhaul2397 will that be the same for all uniformly distributed charges? Is it ok if I do not use density and just integrate dq for those type of questions but with different shapes with uniformly distributed charges?
Why wasn't the linear charge density inserted into the point charge equation before integration, after pulling out the constants you should have been integrating d(theta) = theta. Which would have cancelled out the 2pi leaving only KQ/(x^2+a^2)^3/2 = 2.05*10^5 N/C !!
The denominator should be (x^2+a^2)^3/2, not R^3.... I think you're right!
I have the same question, I know this is late but have you figured out why?
@@NikkaPleeease How is this different from the one with the formula of the denominator raised to 3/2……?
@@NikkaPleeease it's the same because R= sqrt of x^2+a^2 which equals to (x^2+a^2)^1/2 so R^3 = (x^2+a^2)^3/2
Please do behind the scene video sir
I love u
God
Listen to MOS (Battery Full) by Lil Peep and tell me that he doesnt sound like this guy
LOL did he say 50 nanocloobs
i feel so dumb
You are thee shit👍🏻
Why was i randomly unsubscribed... Wtf youtube?!?
this guy is epic gangnam style