Use Discount Code ARJ for StudyIQ Judiciary Courses at a Maximum discount! Hurry Enrol Now : studyiq.u9ilnk.me/d/9kiiOBrpbc Telegram Channels🔗 👉🏻 Arjita Ma’am- t.me/arjitachaturvedi 👉🏻 StudyIQ Official Channel- t.me/studyiqjudiciary Instagram Handle🔗 instagram.com/studyiq.judiciary?igsh=MWhpcGt0eHo2MWtxbw== For Free Counselling & Preparation Guidance 📞076-4000-3000 Whatsapp Chat 🔗 wa.me/919649876464 🔴 Download Free StudyIQ App to Access Free Courses studyiq.u9ilnk.me/d/2ojDHMzCy4 🔴 Free Family Laws Series- studyiq.u9ilnk.me/d/gZWzrXpDLB 🔴 Free AIBE Knockout Series- studyiq.u9ilnk.me/d/6cQzs62lOO 🎉 Exciting News for All Future Judges! We have launched a New Foundation Batch 🎉 🏆 PRATIGYA JUDICIARY FOUNDATION BATCH 🏆 आपका सपना हमारी ज़िम्मेदारी 📌Batch Link - studyiq.u9ilnk.me/d/9kiiOBrpbc ⌛Batch Starting From 21st Oct' 24 🎊Key Features - 👉🏻What makes this Batch different is our Performance Evaluation System i.e. 15-day tests and Monthly Mock Tests by which Learners can track their Preparation . 👉🏻 Special Rewards i.e. Monthly Rewards worth 5K 🎉 Use Code " ARJ " to Get maximum discount
The words "socialist" and "secular" were added to the Indian Constitution's Preamble during the Indian Emergency in 1976, through the 42nd Amendment ¹ ². This amendment was passed by the Parliament during Indira Gandhi's government, aiming to incorporate these values into the Constitution. The addition of "socialist" reflects India's commitment to social democracy, emphasizing the importance of distributive justice and reducing socio-economic inequalities ¹. On the other hand, "secular" ensures that the state maintains a neutral stance towards all religions, guaranteeing equal freedom and respect for all citizens ¹ ². Interestingly, although these words were formally introduced in 1976, the Constitution already had socialist and secular content through various Directive Principles of State Policy and fundamental rights ¹ ². The Supreme Court even recognized secularism as a basic structure of the Constitution in 1974, two years before the amendment ².
सरकार किसी की हो सिस्टम हमारा है को सिद्ध करेगा सुप्रीम कोर्ट आज सुप्रीम कोर्ट पर अधिक विश्वास नहीं कर सकते हैं कई फैसले ने चौंकाया हैं सुप्रीम कोर्ट किसके लिए कार्य कर रहा है देश के लिए या एनजीओ के लिए
Aapne emergency dekhi hai kya . Emergency ke dauran kya kya hua tha ek baar google karke padh lena . Pata chal jaayega ki abhi ka samay kharaab hai ki emergency ka
Whoever did this is extremely stupid first of all secularism in the preamble says India ka koi perticular religion nhi h. It means kisi ko privilege nhi milegi, which is actually right. And theses words shouldn't be removed at all. As it has many benefits. Removal will creat problems.
Hona bhi chahiye 20%upper caste Hindus ko muslim bana Jana chahiye aur tab hum 40% ho jayenge aur civil war start kar denge kyuki hum desh ke liye soch Rahe hai aur obc hamara hi gala kaatne par tule huye hai roj reservation badhta ja raha hai
Actually bro... funadamental structure of our constitution interpretates that India is 'Religiously Impartial'. Now the word religiously impartial is not equal to word secular rather it means that the state is not aligned to any specific religion. This enables our government and lawmakers to assess any community in respect to their specific circumstances without creating any bias. The concept of secularism does not includes this ability. But Indira Gandhi hurrily added this word without understanding the difference. And this word is now being misused against the majority population.
Indian secularism is not non-interference It is positive interference of the state As no religion has equal influence and power in the country. hence it is the duty of the state to support minority religion too Madam jiiii😂
Congress or india alliance se mila hua h supreme court .. CJI dy chandrachud bik chuka h.. Saare faisle hindu virodhi h..humare tax ka paisa madarsa chalane ke liye nhi hona chahiye.. One nation one law or one nation one education hona chahiye.. Muslim minority nhi h..constitution mein minority ke liye koi law nhi h congress ka desh virodhi minority law khatam hona chahiye..ashwani upadhyay supreme court wakeel ko suno..😢
@@anindian6557 Do u reality think, this type of dumb people ever read or know anything about ambedkar ji... They just know some propaganda nothing concrete...
*Gujarat: National President of Kshatriya Karni Sena Dr. Raj Shekhawat announces reward of Rs 1,11,11,111 for Lawrence Bishnoi's encounter* Karni Sena will give this amount to the encountering policeman and also ensure security
Abslutely cortrct to remove the of secularism & socialism. When they have been allotted a seperate state of Pakistan on religious grounds, why the hell we should adopt secularism & socialism for them here.
Are u trying to challenge the thoughts of our respected BR Ambedkar ji ? Our respected Ambedkar ji did not include these words and he had logic of not doing it.
@@ravijeeverma876 No bro, I didn't challenged thoughts of Ambedkar ji. But can you please give me reference where Ambedkar ji said he was against it ??
Bharat is secular democracy only for compatible religion, Hindu, Jain, bodh and Sikh community /religious. Invaders and colonial cleverly managed to include themselves . Even after getting desired Pakistan and Bangladesh and keeping eyes on Bharat properties and resources. Congress party constitution aren't national interests. Preamble are part of constitution never nation.. Nation could easily exist without constitution and democracy. They tactically planed. We already have functional kingdoms and republican nations .. So we can't expect nationalism or progess with colonial constitution. We need nationalist Bharat constitution.
The world should be be replaced anti socialist and anti secular 😂or fascism n communism...😂as reflecting the current govt tendencies...all developed currently are secular and social where citizen are identified by their profession not by any religion.
Madrchod terrorism ka mtlb v pta h tujhe.... Hindu kvi v desh ke virudh nhi jata.. Or rahi h crimes ki agar hamne htyar uthaya hota , tum kathuye kya avi tak jinda hote
U know very well our State Machinery is not Democratic, Socialist, Secular in act then what is the problem to keep it in words We know very we well can't enjoy equal rights as a citizens, treatment of discrimination is their in Administration, Judiciary System based on economic health, cast, religion etc still there is no problem if we keep the word DEMOCRATIC in our constitution. We know very well that 90% of of our poor population fear to approach our Administration and Judiciary System as an individual, but in word equal right is as per Democracy no problem. If owner of the Majority of Capital become the entire Nation automatically it will act as Socialist State whether it is written in Constitution or not. If our State Machinery act without any discrimination based on any faith, automatically it will act as a Secular whether it is written in Constitution or not, no matter. Among top 10 Chinese Companies, 9 r Government Companies, owner is the Nation, whether the word Socialist is written in their constitution or not, no matter, the State Machinery is bound to act as Socialist State Machinery.
Madam ARJ you should first learn to respect the great leader's while addressing them and also know history with more details and then should try to teach
@@rkey4388 It has my boy, it has. We all know from where these ideas coming from😂. This not Pakistan that Government will be religion specific and the court will approve 😂
@@YugantSamal no it's not SON and second it is in court and court will decide.. Your point is irrelevant here, if Indian govt. Was like Pakistan the way you said.., it was already implementation... And if you have little sense you will understand that even court is not secular when it comes to religion and not equal when it comes to men/women...
Kya bkwas hai ye, secular hone kya dikkt hai logo ko. Ye sab desh todna chahte hai dhram k nam pr. Ase toh sare low thope hue h hum par vo bhi khrij hone chaiye. Secular follow krne se desh m ekta or sath rehna chahti h
Use Discount Code ARJ for StudyIQ Judiciary Courses at a Maximum discount!
Hurry Enrol Now : studyiq.u9ilnk.me/d/9kiiOBrpbc
Telegram Channels🔗
👉🏻 Arjita Ma’am- t.me/arjitachaturvedi
👉🏻 StudyIQ Official Channel- t.me/studyiqjudiciary
Instagram Handle🔗 instagram.com/studyiq.judiciary?igsh=MWhpcGt0eHo2MWtxbw==
For Free Counselling & Preparation Guidance 📞076-4000-3000
Whatsapp Chat 🔗
wa.me/919649876464
🔴 Download Free StudyIQ App to Access Free Courses
studyiq.u9ilnk.me/d/2ojDHMzCy4
🔴 Free Family Laws Series- studyiq.u9ilnk.me/d/gZWzrXpDLB
🔴 Free AIBE Knockout Series- studyiq.u9ilnk.me/d/6cQzs62lOO
🎉 Exciting News for All Future Judges! We have launched a New Foundation Batch 🎉
🏆 PRATIGYA JUDICIARY FOUNDATION BATCH 🏆
आपका सपना हमारी ज़िम्मेदारी
📌Batch Link - studyiq.u9ilnk.me/d/9kiiOBrpbc
⌛Batch Starting From 21st Oct' 24
🎊Key Features -
👉🏻What makes this Batch different is our Performance Evaluation System i.e. 15-day tests and Monthly Mock Tests by which Learners can track their Preparation .
👉🏻 Special Rewards i.e. Monthly Rewards worth 5K
🎉 Use Code " ARJ " to Get maximum discount
Sir Bharat Secular country hai bhi nahi. Ispar ab chamche congressi royenge.
These 2 illegally added words should be removed asap.
very well put mam, all the points very well explained
🚩 *जयश्रीराम*
🇮🇳 *जयश्रीकृष्ण*
🕉️ *हर हर महादेव*
The words "socialist" and "secular" were added to the Indian Constitution's Preamble during the Indian Emergency in 1976, through the 42nd Amendment ¹ ². This amendment was passed by the Parliament during Indira Gandhi's government, aiming to incorporate these values into the Constitution.
The addition of "socialist" reflects India's commitment to social democracy, emphasizing the importance of distributive justice and reducing socio-economic inequalities ¹. On the other hand, "secular" ensures that the state maintains a neutral stance towards all religions, guaranteeing equal freedom and respect for all citizens ¹ ².
Interestingly, although these words were formally introduced in 1976, the Constitution already had socialist and secular content through various Directive Principles of State Policy and fundamental rights ¹ ². The Supreme Court even recognized secularism as a basic structure of the Constitution in 1974, two years before the amendment ².
These words must be removed
Those words must be removed.
🤬😡😡
@@endless812 i believe, you are jihadi 😁 esliye jli na 😁
Bilkul
Jisne. Bhi petition dala hai mai usko bhagwan Manta hu
Har kisi ko bhagwan maan lena bewakoofi hai. Isi liye log andhbhakt bolte hai ham logo ko.
Ex hindu movement jindabad
realist azad
rational world
Science journey
Amit tiwari nastik
Vimoh
Jago panch
Human with science
toh tu mahamurkh k sath sath andhbhakt v hai bhai....abhi b time hai thoda padle Indian society ko....,fundamental rights k ,dpsp k ....
@@livinglegendkumarsanufan5649 jahil asli id main ana phir bhok chatukaar.
Phle inn words ka mtlb pta kr 🙄🙄🙄🙄
Reality me ye hotni chahiye or supreme court sacha me niyam kanun or dosabej par adharit hai ta hot jayega.
Celular & Socialism Samvidhan ka Word Nahi hain, Withdra this word from Constitution.
Ex hindu movement jindabad
realist azad
rational world
Science journey
Amit tiwari nastik
Vimoh
Jago panch
Human with science
@@noobprogrammer4281 Jai Makkeswar Mahadev Vagwan ki 🔱🙏🏾🚩
@@noobprogrammer4281 get a life.
@@रवि-ध6ढ Bhai Secular hota hai. Cellular nahi
Fundamental rights me secular world already hai
42 constitution amendment act 1976 hai
सरकार किसी की हो सिस्टम हमारा है को सिद्ध करेगा सुप्रीम कोर्ट
आज सुप्रीम कोर्ट पर अधिक विश्वास नहीं कर सकते हैं कई फैसले ने चौंकाया हैं सुप्रीम कोर्ट किसके लिए कार्य कर रहा है देश के लिए या एनजीओ के लिए
Must be removed without delay😢😢
It was inserted illegally 😮😮
अभी तो Emergency से भी ख़तरनाक समय चल रहा है।
kyo bakf board khatm ho rha hai isliye?
Chal jhoothe😂
Teri nasbandi Kara di kya jo emergency me kiya tha b*******k
Aapne emergency dekhi hai kya . Emergency ke dauran kya kya hua tha ek baar google karke padh lena . Pata chal jaayega ki abhi ka samay kharaab hai ki emergency ka
Petitioners have put very strong points.
It should have been done earlier
Mam, preamble is based but interpretation is development of mind .This is a matter of how close people interpret the constitution .
Ye secular word pure Bharat me khi nhi bola jana chahiye
Point to be discussed
Ma'am India me secularism ka meaning china wala ne ha toh Fundamental rights Violate ne ho re hai
Whoever did this is extremely stupid first of all secularism in the preamble says India ka koi perticular religion nhi h. It means kisi ko privilege nhi milegi, which is actually right. And theses words shouldn't be removed at all. As it has many benefits. Removal will creat problems.
देश का विनाश नजदीक है
Hona bhi chahiye 20%upper caste Hindus ko muslim bana Jana chahiye aur tab hum 40% ho jayenge aur civil war start kar denge kyuki hum desh ke liye soch Rahe hai aur obc hamara hi gala kaatne par tule huye hai roj reservation badhta ja raha hai
Good news
Pakistan was separated from India based on religion so India is Hindu rashtra, not secular
Actually bro... funadamental structure of our constitution interpretates that India is 'Religiously Impartial'. Now the word religiously impartial is not equal to word secular rather it means that the state is not aligned to any specific religion. This enables our government and lawmakers to assess any community in respect to their specific circumstances without creating any bias. The concept of secularism does not includes this ability. But Indira Gandhi hurrily added this word without understanding the difference. And this word is now being misused against the majority population.
Tera baap ka ha India 😂😂😂😂
Indian secularism is not non-interference
It is positive interference of the state
As no religion has equal influence and power in the country. hence it is the duty of the state to support minority religion too
Madam jiiii😂
BJP jitega jarur is Case me✊🏾
Suprime kotha has entered the chat
Ex hindu movement jindabad
realist azad
rational world
Science journey
Amit tiwari nastik
Vimoh
Jago panch
Human with science
🍌@@noobprogrammer4281
BJP hatao desh bachao
@@noobprogrammer4281ex muslim Adam seeker ex lundbedkarite jindabad
Congress or india alliance se mila hua h supreme court .. CJI dy chandrachud bik chuka h.. Saare faisle hindu virodhi h..humare tax ka paisa madarsa chalane ke liye nhi hona chahiye.. One nation one law or one nation one education hona chahiye.. Muslim minority nhi h..constitution mein minority ke liye koi law nhi h congress ka desh virodhi minority law khatam hona chahiye..ashwani upadhyay supreme court wakeel ko suno..😢
religion ke naam par rajniti hone lagega sidhe taur par
B.R Ambekar was also against rss then why rss working.
@@gamexinfo332 valid point..., do some research...
U will figure it out..
Ambedkar was against to keep muslim in india after partition on basis of religion
@@anindian6557 Do u reality think, this type of dumb people ever read or know anything about ambedkar ji...
They just know some propaganda nothing concrete...
Br Ambedkar didn't even contribute more than 5% in the constitution. Stop sucking up to that guy
@@TheMcMemer damn.... someone telling hard facts...
*Gujarat: National President of Kshatriya Karni Sena Dr. Raj Shekhawat announces reward of Rs 1,11,11,111 for Lawrence Bishnoi's encounter*
Karni Sena will give this amount to the encountering policeman and also ensure security
Toh jaa naa maar de
nhi hatna chaiye shabhi darmo ka manne bala h humhara bharat
Clat intraat exam Hind ma 2025ma hoga
primable mi kat chat nhi hona chaiye na abhi na kabhi origanal he hona chaiye
Abslutely cortrct to remove the of secularism & socialism. When they have been allotted a seperate state of Pakistan on religious grounds, why the hell we should adopt secularism & socialism for them here.
But etne din bad supreme court jana🤔
These words should not be removed. If these words are removed,it will be against Idea of India.
Are u trying to challenge the thoughts of our respected BR Ambedkar ji ? Our respected Ambedkar ji did not include these words and he had logic of not doing it.
@@ravijeeverma876 No bro, I didn't challenged thoughts of Ambedkar ji. But can you please give me reference where Ambedkar ji said he was against it ??
@@avinnash_kumar read the Constituent assembly debates
These two words are put in constitution by the way that is against the idea of india.
@@avinnash_kumarpreamble cannot amended
Not only Muslim. Tripura Hindu Bengali community society 40 lakh go back in Bangladesh
REMOVE THE WORDS
Parlement act1991 ka palan kon karaga
citation??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
jay mata rani
Ab to faisla bhi phle se tay h or kursi. Bhi 😂😂😂😂😂
Bharat is secular democracy only for compatible religion, Hindu, Jain, bodh and Sikh community /religious. Invaders and colonial cleverly managed to include themselves . Even after getting desired Pakistan and Bangladesh and keeping eyes on Bharat properties and resources. Congress party constitution aren't national interests. Preamble are part of constitution never nation.. Nation could easily exist without constitution and democracy. They tactically planed. We already have functional kingdoms and republican nations .. So we can't expect nationalism or progess with colonial constitution. We need nationalist Bharat constitution.
The world should be be replaced anti socialist and anti secular 😂or fascism n communism...😂as reflecting the current govt tendencies...all developed currently are secular and social where citizen are identified by their profession not by any religion.
Ab hindu tarririsam nazzy ho gaya h damocrisis constitutional financial........education midia Savarkar godsay
Madrchod terrorism ka mtlb v pta h tujhe....
Hindu kvi v desh ke virudh nhi jata..
Or rahi h crimes ki agar hamne htyar uthaya hota , tum kathuye kya avi tak jinda hote
U know very well our State Machinery is not Democratic, Socialist, Secular in act then what is the problem to keep it in words
We know very we well can't enjoy equal rights as a citizens, treatment of discrimination is their in Administration, Judiciary System based on economic health, cast, religion etc still there is no problem if we keep the word DEMOCRATIC in our constitution.
We know very well that 90% of of our poor population fear to approach our Administration and Judiciary System as an individual, but in word equal right is as per Democracy no problem.
If owner of the Majority of Capital become the entire Nation automatically it will act as Socialist State whether it is written in Constitution or not.
If our State Machinery act without any discrimination based on any faith, automatically it will act as a Secular whether it is written in Constitution or not, no matter.
Among top 10 Chinese Companies, 9 r Government Companies, owner is the Nation, whether the word Socialist is written in their constitution or not, no matter, the State Machinery is bound to act as Socialist State Machinery.
Jawahar lal or Rajendra Prasad ka constitution likhne me koi bhi yogdaan nhi tha
Ye kevel B R Ambedkar ji ne likha
Fake news mat falo
Sab anpad log comment kr re hai remove😂😂😂😂😂
On the way to Hindu Nation.......😂😂😂😂
Ab kaunse acts discussion ke baad pass aur enforce ho rhe hain/?😂
socialism must me there in the constitution
Madam ARJ you should first learn to respect the great leader's while addressing them and also know history with more details and then should try to teach
Nothing is going to happen. Supreme Court is not RSS court😂
it has nothing to do with RSS....
Yes😂😂😂😂😂
@@rkey4388 It has my boy, it has. We all know from where these ideas coming from😂. This not Pakistan that Government will be religion specific and the court will approve 😂
RSS hi Hai
@@YugantSamal no it's not SON and second it is in court and court will decide..
Your point is irrelevant here, if Indian govt. Was like Pakistan the way you said.., it was already implementation...
And if you have little sense you will understand that even court is not secular when it comes to religion and not equal when it comes to men/women...
In India only hindu one Nation one religion one rule
Ambedkar contribution in Constitution is not more than 5%.
Jai bhim
Kya bkwas hai ye, secular hone kya dikkt hai logo ko. Ye sab desh todna chahte hai dhram k nam pr. Ase toh sare low thope hue h hum par vo bhi khrij hone chaiye. Secular follow krne se desh m ekta or sath rehna chahti h
देश में विदेशी ब्राह्मण 3.5% hai so ब्राह्मण को minority का आरक्षण मिलना चाहिए।
Biased argument talking about one side of the coin.
not intrusted in your irritating course ........ stop selling.
Remove both words