Sorry, but at 32.20~, you asserted that the accretion disc model of planetary formation is "accurate". And yet, neither you nor the originators of this hypothesis have any evidence to support that assertion. A far as I'm concernned, this assertion is bogus and should be struck from future such descriptions, as there is more evidence, both circumstancial and reasonably logical, to assert that planets are in fact the cores of dead stars. This explains why rocky planets are so heavy-metals rich and why asteroids- which are further fragmented rocky bodies- are often solid iron. It also explains why the planets are so very precisely spherical, as there is no mechanism that can form perfect spheres in space except the fact that they were once entirely molten bodies. In further defence of my hypothesis, I cite the illogical idea that eight separate spherical bodies- all with very different chemistries- could be formed from a single accretion disc at the same time as the Sun. This is simply not reasonable and must be rejected. Since it has most recently been shown by Dr Pierre-Marie Robitaille that Stars are constituted by predominantly condensed matter- the same matter as planets are formed by - then the hypothesis of planets (and all other spherical bodies) being dead star cores, is perfectly valid. Citations: Patrick Vanraes, Annemie Bogaerts; Plasma physics of liquids-A focused review. Applied Physics Reviews 1 September 2018; 5 (3): 031103. doi.org/10.1063/1.5020511 P.-M.L. Robitaille, Forty Lines of Evidence for Condensed Matter - The Sun on Trial: Liquid Metallic Hydrogen as a Solar Building Block. Prog. Phys. 2013, 4, 90-142. ptep-online.com/2013/PP-35-16.PDF A.G. Kosovichev and V.V. Zharkova, X-ray flare sparks quake inside Sun, Nature 1998, v. 393, 317-318. www.nature.com/articles/30629 A.G. Kosovichev and V.V. Zharkova, Seismic response to solar flares: Theoretical predictions, Proc. 4th SOHO Workshop, Helioseismology, ESA SP-376, ESTEC, Noordwijk, 1995. quake.stanford.edu/~sasha/PAPE... P.-M.L. Robitaille, The Collapse of the Big Bang and the Gaseous Sun, New York Times, March 17, 2002, p. A12. web.archive.org/web/200303081... P.-M.L. Robitaille, Stellar Opacity: The Achilles' Heel of the Gaseous Sun. Progr. Phys., 2011, v. 3, 93-99. ptep-online.com/2011/PP-26-11.PDF
![The Incredible Story of the Milky Way [4K]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/sDuZiimfSQU/mqdefault.jpg)
![The Incredible Story of the Milky Way [4K]](/img/tr.png)
Did you guys get UAP and NHI Disclosure early or something?
Very interesting. Especially the moving star at the end. You don't really think of stars as moving visibly, but I guess 100 years is a long time.
Sorry, but at 32.20~, you asserted that the accretion disc model of planetary formation is "accurate". And yet, neither you nor the originators of this hypothesis have any evidence to support that assertion.
A far as I'm concernned, this assertion is bogus and should be struck from future such descriptions, as there is more evidence, both circumstancial and reasonably logical, to assert that planets are in fact the cores of dead stars. This explains why rocky planets are so heavy-metals rich and why asteroids- which are further fragmented rocky bodies- are often solid iron. It also explains why the planets are so very precisely spherical, as there is no mechanism that can form perfect spheres in space except the fact that they were once entirely molten bodies.
In further defence of my hypothesis, I cite the illogical idea that eight separate spherical bodies- all with very different chemistries- could be formed from a single accretion disc at the same time as the Sun. This is simply not reasonable and must be rejected.
Since it has most recently been shown by Dr Pierre-Marie Robitaille that Stars are constituted by predominantly condensed matter- the same matter as planets are formed by - then the hypothesis of planets (and all other spherical bodies) being dead star cores, is perfectly valid.
Citations:
Patrick Vanraes, Annemie Bogaerts; Plasma physics of liquids-A focused review. Applied Physics Reviews 1 September 2018; 5 (3): 031103. doi.org/10.1063/1.5020511
P.-M.L. Robitaille, Forty Lines of Evidence for Condensed Matter - The Sun on Trial: Liquid Metallic Hydrogen as a Solar Building Block. Prog. Phys. 2013, 4, 90-142. ptep-online.com/2013/PP-35-16.PDF
A.G. Kosovichev and V.V. Zharkova, X-ray flare sparks quake inside Sun, Nature 1998, v. 393, 317-318.
www.nature.com/articles/30629
A.G. Kosovichev and V.V. Zharkova, Seismic response to solar flares: Theoretical predictions, Proc. 4th SOHO Workshop, Helioseismology, ESA SP-376, ESTEC, Noordwijk, 1995.
quake.stanford.edu/~sasha/PAPE...
P.-M.L. Robitaille, The Collapse of the Big Bang and the Gaseous Sun, New York Times, March 17, 2002, p. A12. web.archive.org/web/200303081...
P.-M.L. Robitaille, Stellar Opacity: The Achilles' Heel of the Gaseous Sun. Progr. Phys., 2011, v. 3, 93-99.
ptep-online.com/2011/PP-26-11.PDF