+ytmndman Mato will win, because he takes short time ; Kingscrusher will loose because he always takes time in saying this variation was played 319 time, that one 270 times and will eventually run out of time and make mistakes.
Mato, you have excellent commentary. However, before the move 8. f4 d6 it was hyperaccelerated dragon. As soon as Reshevsky played d6, it turned into the dragon.
6:35 What attacks king on H7? It's not checkmate! Black rook can take a bishop. White isn't able to do checkmate, because queen and knight can't defense each other. (if white decides to Qg8 or Qf7, then he loses knight)
Please quit chess... Mato didn't say it was checkmate, but it's obvious that black is 100% lost. If rook takes bishop, then Knight e7 is attacking rook and threatening mate in 1. Only defense is to move G pawn, after which the rook will be lost eventually by open checks.
Should have used the accelerated dragon, although it might not have helped much. I prefer Najdorf variation myself, but Fischer would still give me a good game (*_*)
You're right that queen G6-E4 was a blunder, should have pushed the pawn F7-F5 ... figure white's response could have been knight captures bishop E3-G4 ~ bishop is just left hanging, free piece and it improves the position of the knight for further attacks ... though its not nearly as elegant as Fischer's play in the game.
The number 666 actually refers to the Roman Emperor Nero Caesar who reigned at the time the book of Revelation was written. Many languages at the time had letters that doubled as numbers, the Hebrew language being one of them. Jewish people refered to him as Neros Caesar (numerical value of 666) while others referred to him as Nero Caesar (616).
by Todd Strandberg 666 - The Number of the Beast Ever since John, the servant of God, wrote the Book of Revelation and mentioned the number 666, people have been trying to figure out the meaning of the mark of the beast. The number is mentioned in Revelation 13:16-18. I believe the mark or number of the beast will be a financial identification system that the Antichrist will establish during the tribulation. He will use the mark as a tool for controlling all aspects of society.
yes, I know it's rude in this particular conversation but he does bring it up from time to time. While not beeing appropriate here it's more directed to the general content which is nearly always beautiful chess but sometimes a little religious. It's easy to avoid that and it's not even contributing to the content. I'm watching mato to relax, to learn about chess, not his religious point of view.
I've never really heard his religious point of view in a video. commenting on religious topic in a comment is hardly presenting a religious point of view and is not a big part of the general content of this channel and don't you think anyone would be offended if you called his or her religion a cult? lets just enjoy the beautiful chess.
If I'm explaining maths to someone, I'd completely understand it if they don't really care about my religion let alone appreciate what I have to say about the matter. It's the same reason your boss doesn't want to know about how many kittens your neighbour's cat just had.
mato, you are the best youtube commentator on youtube but a great deal of your viewers are atheists like me. Try to show your chess side and not your religious side (because frankly, I don't really like the christian cult)
speak for yourself and let others speak and show what ever side they wish is what i'm trying to say. its as if you were to butt into a math conversation and say "I don't like math" or "I think its boring", "Please show us your Non-math side only." do you see how that's rude?
your comment is rude and stupid. how would you feel if you were asked to not show your atheist side? know that he was only replying to a comment anyway and its not like he's preaching through his chess videos...
I like your videos cause they are fast, right to the point, show great games, and have a bit of humor.
Exactly
Thank you
thank you Mato, you are the best- Fischer plays strategic masterpieces- your commentary is the best
fisher was one of the best. thank you for the video
Mato, sjajni ste! Keep up the good work!
Perfect job my friend. You show the way one should think during the game..Thank u very much!!
Fischer plays extremely sharp
You're a good commentator man. Definitely deserve more popularity.
and that knight never moved again, what a genius
Great job! Every time I watch a video of your account I become better at chess! Thank you very much!😉
Hey Mato you`r the man!
Excellent game 👌🏾
Thank you 👍
mato the best!
bobby fisher and tal are two great players of all time probably
analysing a game is easy than to play there
You know what I want to see? A match between Mato and Kingscrusher
+ytmndman Mato will win, because he takes short time ; Kingscrusher will loose because he always takes time in saying this variation was played 319 time, that one 270 times and will eventually run out of time and make mistakes.
+ytmndman THIS.
*lose*
well explained dude.. thanks
wont you wish us good luck with our chess? :(
It was 2011, he is still a newbie in this utube thingy lol
I wish you good luck with your chess. Goodbye.
Fischer is gonna get you one way or another!!
Turn up volume a bit in other videos please :-)
Best youtube commentator on youtube? Are you implying there are better youtube commentators on other sites?
En aquella época....con 19 años Bobby ya jugaba con la presición de una máquina.
that rocked
ThxMato
Mato, you have excellent commentary. However, before the move 8. f4 d6 it was hyperaccelerated dragon. As soon as Reshevsky played d6, it turned into the dragon.
666 (six hundred and sixty-six) is the natural number following 665 and preceding 667.
MatoJelic Dude. Need better audio. It's too low.
Mato may God guide you through your chess coaching and keep in faith
6:35 What attacks king on H7? It's not checkmate!
Black rook can take a bishop. White isn't able to do checkmate, because queen and knight can't defense each other. (if white decides to Qg8 or Qf7, then he loses knight)
Please quit chess... Mato didn't say it was checkmate, but it's obvious that black is 100% lost.
If rook takes bishop, then Knight e7 is attacking rook and threatening mate in 1. Only defense is to move G pawn, after which the rook will be lost eventually by open checks.
Should have used the accelerated dragon, although it might not have helped much. I prefer Najdorf variation myself, but Fischer would still give me a good game (*_*)
Not only give you a good but destroy you more like it!!
Optimus Prime amen brother!
+Optimus Prime true !!
Optimus Primegood game, maybe if he handicapped queen and rooks.
why the name dragon variation??
Chess can also be fancy from time to time
Liking our own comments, are we Tiwaking Tiwaking ? Well, I too can play that game.
it's good to know everything you can about the game to get better. it could be called Hercules and fischer would still destroy it!
It is called Dragon because of the black pawn formation that follows after moving the pawn to g6 and also pawn to d6
No crap Sherlock
@Armedmanx No, black could move all other pieces. Stalmate is when one has no legal moves to do.
You're right that queen G6-E4 was a blunder, should have pushed the pawn F7-F5 ... figure white's response could have been knight captures bishop E3-G4 ~ bishop is just left hanging, free piece and it improves the position of the knight for further attacks ... though its not nearly as elegant as Fischer's play in the game.
isnt this a stalemate?
I most likely meant chess instead of youtube, no?
The number 666 actually refers to the Roman Emperor Nero Caesar who reigned at the time the book of Revelation was written. Many languages at the time had letters that doubled as numbers, the Hebrew language being one of them. Jewish people refered to him as Neros Caesar (numerical value of 666) while others referred to him as Nero Caesar (616).
Sammy thought he was the true US champ. They had a strong rivalry.
Sammy fought so hard in that game...I kinda felt sorry for him afterwards.
Also I feel Samuel played 2 tempo losing moves in this game giving fischer the much needed advantage
Poor sound quality
"Why black resigned?" hahahaha
Lúcio Targino cause checkmate in 1.
He resigned in view of this variation
by small steps methodically :)
At 5:03 Nd2 wins, as the queen has no safe squares on the b1/h7 diagonal
I hate it, winning the game just because my opponent resigned!
i never loose against Fischer xd
by Todd Strandberg
666 - The Number of the Beast
Ever since John, the servant of God, wrote the Book of Revelation and mentioned the number 666, people have been trying to figure out the meaning of the mark of the beast. The number is mentioned in Revelation 13:16-18.
I believe the mark or number of the beast will be a financial identification system that the Antichrist will establish during the tribulation. He will use the mark as a tool for controlling all aspects of society.
Mato, yes that's a likely scenario.
you deserve more polularity, why dont you try talking with other
chess channels? Im sure that there will be people that will help you :)
yes, I know it's rude in this particular conversation but he does bring it up from time to time. While not beeing appropriate here it's more directed to the general content which is nearly always beautiful chess but sometimes a little religious. It's easy to avoid that and it's not even contributing to the content. I'm watching mato to relax, to learn about chess, not his religious point of view.
I've never really heard his religious point of view in a video. commenting on religious topic in a comment is hardly presenting a religious point of view and is not a big part of the general content of this channel and don't you think anyone would be offended if you called his or her religion a cult? lets just enjoy the beautiful chess.
If I'm explaining maths to someone, I'd completely understand it if they don't really care about my religion let alone appreciate what I have to say about the matter.
It's the same reason your boss doesn't want to know about how many kittens your neighbour's cat just had.
you*
Fischer is not afraid of dragons
Dresdner Dragonslayer
mato, you are the best youtube commentator on youtube but a great deal of your viewers are atheists like me. Try to show your chess side and not your religious side (because frankly, I don't really like the christian cult)
Hah! If only it was rook on the second rank to D2.
I disagree with Fischer at 6:12. King 2D2 loses to Emperor Chewbacca.
Sorry...couldn't resist. x^)
speak for yourself and let others speak and show what ever side they wish is what i'm trying to say. its as if you were to butt into a math conversation and say "I don't like math" or "I think its boring", "Please show us your Non-math side only." do you see how that's rude?
I wouldn't last 10 moves against Bobby Fischer.
your comment is rude and stupid. how would you feel if you were asked to not show your atheist side? know that he was only replying to a comment anyway and its not like he's preaching through his chess videos...
annoying clicks in the sound