Helios 500 please.. its the most economical in India.. please review.. i already got it but i dont have any point of comparison as i never used any other scanner..
Check our reviews! We have covered these scanners already: instituteofdigitaldentistry.com/intraoral-scanner-reviews/helios-600-intraoral-scanner-review/ instituteofdigitaldentistry.com/cad-cam/aoralscan-3-scanner-review-the-latest-ios-by-shining-3d/ Note - the Helios 600 was a rebadged Alliedstar scanner. The company no longer works with Helios to make these, and Helios now makes the Helios 500.
The margin line is exported as a separate file - the format is xyz; when you import the scan project into exocad, it will be automatically imported into exocad
Both are good in their own right. Different software advantages. Medit i600 is a great low-cost option, and so is Aoralscan 3. I would suggest try both and see what you prefer.
Oh wow. I didn’t even know that. They do look exactly the same and even the software looks the same. Could you tell me how it could be inferior to others because it seems it can do everything without a limitation besides itero being exclusive for invisalign. My main reason for buying a scanner is full arch restoration (10 crown preps on each arch), to take bite registration, and also to do some implant restorations and scan for diagnostic models.
@@JoonKimDMD for scanning alone it is fine. software is nothing like medit, shining etc. its just a low cost scanning tool. I would suggest try before you buy and see if you like it.
@@InstituteofDigitalDentistry What software feature can we expect by choosing medit, or shining over S200? If all I want is to scan accurately, fast, and save it as STL, would S200 be as good as the others?
@@JoonKimDMD To do simple tasks like this all work well. Medit software is more polished that is all with more features But Shining has been working hard to catch up.
Helios 500 please.. its the most economical in India.. please review.. i already got it but i dont have any point of comparison as i never used any other scanner..
How much is that ?
It is coming! Once we get our hands on it :)
@@mikeizack3070 I believe around 6k USD
@@mikeizack3070 i got it for 400000INR around 4800usd in India with a MSI laptop
In the USA, helio500 is called atomica s200 and I am looking to get this one soon.
Can you please Share comparison video between shining 3d aoralscan 3 and helios 600 .!! Thank you
Check our reviews! We have covered these scanners already:
instituteofdigitaldentistry.com/intraoral-scanner-reviews/helios-600-intraoral-scanner-review/
instituteofdigitaldentistry.com/cad-cam/aoralscan-3-scanner-review-the-latest-ios-by-shining-3d/
Note - the Helios 600 was a rebadged Alliedstar scanner. The company no longer works with Helios to make these, and Helios now makes the Helios 500.
helllo sirr, should i chose this aoralscan 3 or AS s200
Both are good frankly. Shining has argubably better software apps but alliedstar is catching up. Try both and see what you like more.
Hello Sir. which scanner would You choose: Aoralscan 3 wireless or Medit i700 wireless?
both are good scanners frankly. Medit has more developed software but Shining 3D is catching up. I would suggest try both and see which you like.
sir, can this scanner to marking median line on 3d model too?
yes it can be used for model scanning
Can we send margin line in stl file
The margin line is exported as a separate file - the format is xyz; when you import the scan project into exocad, it will be automatically imported into exocad
Hi sir
Please médit 600 vs shining Aoral scan 3D ,i both médit 600 but
Both are good in their own right. Different software advantages. Medit i600 is a great low-cost option, and so is Aoralscan 3.
I would suggest try both and see what you prefer.
@@InstituteofDigitalDentistry
Many tanks sir
I'm great full 😌
About medit 600 no HD mode and no oral health report but a solid software
@@HakimHakim-ek2yn I dont use HD mode :)
@@InstituteofDigitalDentistry
Tank u very much Dr
How about atomica S200?
Is it a white labeled HELIOS 500 scanner. We haven not yet reviewed it. I have personally used it and its OK for a entry level product
Oh wow. I didn’t even know that. They do look exactly the same and even the software looks the same. Could you tell me how it could be inferior to others because it seems it can do everything without a limitation besides itero being exclusive for invisalign. My main reason for buying a scanner is full arch restoration (10 crown preps on each arch), to take bite registration, and also to do some implant restorations and scan for diagnostic models.
@@JoonKimDMD for scanning alone it is fine. software is nothing like medit, shining etc. its just a low cost scanning tool. I would suggest try before you buy and see if you like it.
@@InstituteofDigitalDentistry What software feature can we expect by choosing medit, or shining over S200? If all I want is to scan accurately, fast, and save it as STL, would S200 be as good as the others?
@@JoonKimDMD To do simple tasks like this all work well.
Medit software is more polished that is all with more features
But Shining has been working hard to catch up.