I'll finally upgrade from the GH4. This is what I've been waiting for. I don't give a damn about full frame. It's too big, too heavy, too expensive, too noticeable and too intrusive for what I need to do. I don't want to be noticed when working. I want to be perceived as a tourist or an amateur, so I can fly under the radar and get the images I want to make, or the video I want to use. I'll gladly trade the attributes of the full frame systems for what Lumix put into the GH6. It isn't perfect. Nothing is. But it is a huge improvement on what''s come before. I like to think about the story I'm telling, not the technology I'm fighting. Panasonic's interfaces (menu and hardware) just work. They're like Macs and Toyotas. Everything is where it makes sense to find it.
I lost count of how many times people were shocked my photos were taken with "only" a M4/3 camera. 99% of the people who see your photos don't even know what full frame means and can't tell a difference.
I'm a pretty happy GH5 user since almost 5 years and this is really a huge step up. Since I'm using the camera a lot while traveling by bicycle, I need a small setup with small lenses and equipment that fits on the bike. IBIS is extremely important to me. But even more, I think the Panasonic has the perfect user interface to get things done and avoid stupid mistakes that ruins shots that can't be reproduced. The GH5-II has already a lot of improvements over the GH5 in this area and the GH6 is even better. So for me it looks like a no brainer.
I want to VLOG & use the camera also for beautiful travel nature scenaries. So do you think the GH6 would be the right pick for me? I am very curious about the autofocus. So I struggle with my decision a lot, if GH6 or Sony a7IV. What do you think?
@@Fbnt1 I think for travel with landscapes and cities, the AF is good enough. I film a lot like I take a picture that are moving. Larger DOF, AF-S and holding steady or following an object into a pan move. If you want to show your face with blurry background a lot, there might be a problem but I'm not sure about that. I saw videos with heavy vibrating AF and I saw videos without it. I usually set the AF to very slow because I want slow AF-movements like a manual focus puller would do it. Even the GH5 isn't that bad in this area. If you want to focus on birds in flight, running dogs or fast moving sports, the AF isn't that good. Sony's AF is way better for everything that moves faster but the good lenses are heavy and expensive and the video features are not that good. The GH6 4k120p is great and up to FHD 300p is also great. All with 10bit and without crop (or with crop if you want the additional reach). SO it depends on you needs. As a cyclist, I have an action cam or an 360° cam for filming myself and fast action. This is on a completely different level of stabilization and the AF is fixed from near to infinity. Works for me.
The biggest mistake Panasonic made yet again was not having a phase detect AF system. No matter how beautiful the image, it’s absolutely useless when out of focus. Save your money and keep your GH5. It’s still a great camera.
@@Fbnt1 As someone who owns a GH5 and A7S3, buy the A7IV and don’t look back. It’s better in virtually every way (except for IBIs) and it’s lighter which is better for vlogging. Another important note is that the GH6 may very well be Panasonic’s last MFT’s camera.
If you have panny glass, get the gh6. It's a no brainer for improved ibis and af with great video codecs. If photography is your primary game look at dumping panny and moving to one of the big 3. Fuji is great but apsc is not as flexible for photos. If it was me i would stick with panny as they have the best video capabilities and the gh6 improves the photos. You can always move to another system when they catch up on the video side
I chose the OM1 as my new toy and tool. In my opinion a very interesting option capable of almost everything, perfect AF, weather sealed, durable, reliable and with a PERFECT customer service here in Germany.
I'm still a BMPCC 4K user, I still love the quality of the video from it, and I still get things done without it having any IBIS or continuous autofocus. I don't think I'm ready for this GH6, but it sure has a lot of advances. Any camera that does 4:2:2 is my friend. There's a UA-camr who directly compared the GH6 output with A7S III output and the GH6 was superior is most instances.
As someone invested in mft and was planning on adding gh5s’ to my collection, the GH6 is now a fairly easy choice. The improved colour is very pleasing.
the best and most serious camera. I love Panasonic. And your videos as well. I ll buy two GH6 one for everyday use and one for my collection. I am thrilled!
I love how you suggest that the differences in sensor performance should be considered in actual use with compensations for depth of field. One additional point on this is to also consider dynamic range in this category, since most sensors have greater dynamic range at lower ISO values. Just checked the GH5M2 against the Z9 and R3, and when you compensate for a 2 stop reduction in ISO, the smaller format actually has greater dynamic range.
I just got mine at a sale price of $1,600 and even coming from a GH5 (which is still a great camera), this GH6 footage is noticeably better. I didn't think I would care about little things like the tilt of the screen but I use it constantly. And I get to use all my current lenses which I really love. All around an amazing value.
Yes, the X-H2 is the decisive factor. Panasonic and Fuji worked on the organic sensor with twin exposure levels, and it looks like this uses the same principles or techniques learned during that process. Perhaps Fuji will have similar capabilities. The GH6 image looks remarkably good - at least with good lenses.
Oh? Thanks for the fence footage. Wow. Love it when Panasonic throws in these wrenches to my future buying decisions. Can't count the lost footage to jello-slanted trees etc from pans. You're A74 (comparison) comments are spot on.....spot on. We live in a fantastic time.
I love my G9, but I got it for US$800 new. $2200 is too expensive an upgrade for me for 4K120 if AF is not much better. I'm going to get a full frame rig, FX3 or A7c, and play with both systems.
With the GH5/G9 generation, its arguable that Panasonic has already reached a good level/balance for m4/3 and any improvements vs price increase is likely to be marginal. Seems like this is being borne out with the GH6
I won’t sell my m4/3 gear but after moving into Sony FF with the A7c, a7S3 and a7iv - it’s hard to make a case for me in 2022 to buy a GH6. I would of spent my money with Panasonic if the GH6 had arrived 2 years sooner.
*Thank you for at least acknowledging this micro-four-thirds sensored camera's superior higher video resolution than any other mft camera thus far. Almost all of the reviews I've seen on the GH6 have been by reviewers who are mysteriously clamming up about the simple fact the GH6 can shoot in ProRes 5.7K 4:2:2 10 bit video and 5.8K in open gate 4:3, which, if you need to shoot video for multiple release formats, such as Tik-Tok, Twitter, and others, gives you multiple choices in framing in post ! What other MFT format camera offers this level of flexibility ?*
I'm adapting EF glass via sigma after migrating Canon>Sony>Panasonic, all FF. The benefits of the form factor matched with price are a big selling point. As well as the ability to pick up a couple of auto focus lenses relatively inexpensively for gimbal. This looks like a fantastic compliment to the S1. Loving that camera!
Thank you for your review, the GH6 is definetly not a disapointment. Hoping Panasonic update/ release an S1H (Mk2?). The S1H was so impressive, Panasonic stands out of the crowd when it comes to features. The autofocus aside, although much improved for those who might rely on it, a new full frame camera would be a very welcomed release. One other point, camera manufactures should not hold back on announcing future developmenta. It gives users an option to hold back on making purchases, often with regrets, you read these often in comments. My final comment, we should master the tech we have, share and change the world with stories. When you look back at photography and film, much of the story telling is so captivating. Personally don't ever remember thinking 'What camera did they use to capture that!' Hope that makese sense, thank you.
Great review as usual! One thing I would add is for some of us, smaller lens size of M4/3 is also a big deal. For example, I shoot in South Africa every so often and am an older guy who doesn't care to haul around a ton of heavy, bulky lenses. When in South Africa, I shoot in townships where a large big name brand camera says "steal me". Not so much with a Pan M4/3 camera.
For anamorphic there is nothing better at this price. Also the used market has a lot of great cinema and m43 lenses that can be picked up very reasonably. The gh6 is a no brainer for video. Less for photography where new glass and high res ff has an advantage
Hugh, you are a master at this, bravo.... However as an owner of two Sony cameras one is a PXW Z280 camcorder, A7rII and 2-GH4's if I stick to a psychology and tell myself to concentrate on storytelling and not all the hype of new cameras "it can be hard" I find myself working with older cameras to do my job very well. Of course I would love to have new cameras and I find myself looking at them every day but by the time I consider things like adding new lights to my studio and a host of other things to help my storytelling new cameras seem to push to the back of the line as far as new purchases and I'm OK with that.I concentrate on the right tool for what my client deliverables need to be and I find most are still happy with 1080p as I see that changing I will upgrade to newer tools. If I bought a new camera everytime one came out I would never make any money. I am amazed at my GH4's from 2014 that work like slaves in my studio and don't miss a beat however in the words of Hugh Brownstone your mileage may vary.
For our productions we usually use a Sony FX9, but if I would ever need one package to do both video and stills in a travel-friendly way, this would be that one! I’ve recently had a go with the GH5II and the 10-25 Summilux and I was deeply impressed already. Combine this GH6 with both the 10-25, the 25-50 and a rig and you’re in business. What I love about Panasonic is that it might not always be the best spec’ed overall (with the exception of this GH6), it is always well-designed, rugged and beautifully build with professional use in mind. From software to hardware. I’m using the Z7II myself, but everytime I pick up an S1R I notice it’s a the different level of durability. PS. You’re so right to put this DOF hype in perspective. So many people think that you need at least f1.2 to get a good headshot…
@hugh hit the nail on the head in the last minute of the video. The Panasonic GH6 is a pro tool for pro videographers who purchase equipment that upgrades their workflow significantly and then beat the crap out of them for literal years. My father owned a broadcast television studio and considered his gear to be little more than scrap metal, if it was not actively working, bringing in revenue and creating visuals. He would have appreciated the GH6 if it made his life easier by being robust, reliable and operationally sound and manageable. TL;DR autofocus isn't everything to everyone.
daaaaamnn dude!! ..watafc with you!! ...my brain is on 🔥 fire!! ..what a speech!! daaamn!! ..a bunch of reason, facts, examples with real context.. hard and haevy words!! ..i have 2 GH6 my work is 50/50 vids & photos.. now i feel more close to my gh6's ..😢.. thanks for this clear-thinking-exercise!! ...blessings from Mexico
Very nice review! One small point though: camera choice for me is dictated by years of lens acquisition, new and second hand. Changing systems is not a decision lightly taken... So, although a camera may have some negative points, as long as there are no game-stoppers, one tends to remain in the system invested in. Look forward to your in depth review of the GH6!
Megapixels don't matter. Not anymore anyhow. I printed 30 by 40 inch prints from 10MP RAW files taken with MFT cameras from 2010 - taken with a legacy SLR lens from the 1960s. Nobody will notice the slight differences in optical performance in the lenses you talked about. Diminishing returns. What matters today is ergonomics, usability, build quality, color science, reliability in the field etc.
I would love to own a gh6 but they ditched the vertical grip option. I really dont know why. For filming its great because of the added weight and for hybrid shooters who take a lot of portraits a grip is essential.. the grip thing is the only reason i will buy another camera instead
I love Panasonic for still continuing with the GH line of video centric hybrids, what there providing me with in the GH6 is wonderfully bonkers at a price I can afford…ish. Thumbs up 👍 fella.
Great commentary! I'm still on board with my GH5, but happy to see that there is more MFT gear out there. I have the Leica 8-18, the Leica 12-60 and the Summilux 12mm. For challenging low light shots, I have a Nikkon mount 0.64 Metabons 50mm F1.4. Having a great time with my gear and this will be my setup for quite a while. We're aiming for Summer of 2023 to come Statside and visit relatives in Brooklyn. I know you have a hectic schedule, but I'd sure love to follow you around the city one day when we're there. I'd be delighted to return the favor for you here in Stockholm too! Best wishes from Sweden.
Saw this many moons ago but seriously impressive review effort on GH6 Hugh! Anybody? I just got a slightly used GH6 and love it. What are your favorite features any of GH6 firmware updates have brought to end users?
I have a A7SIII and A7III which am super happy with it. Also a GH5 that I got for $700 with $80 25mm f1.7 lens. I’m am set. I do think the GH5/GH6 are more cinematic film cameras oppose to Sony cameras that seem more for commercial work. I would definitely get a GH6 over Blackmagic camera since it has amazing IBIS and autofocus.
Wonderful review. Your videos are always so well thought out and articulated so eloquently. I'm an existing Lumix shooter and the GH6 is looking like a great upgrade, though I think I'll wait until May to see what Fujifilm has in store before I invest more into the M/43 system. But the GH6 really is making it a tough choice for everyone in the sub-2500 price range shooting video.
I agree with much of what you've said. Especially with the lens selections. I have original 12-35mm f/2.8, 35-100mm f/28, and misc other manual M43 lenses. And the original f/2.8 pair are mostly made with the resolving power of 9-12MP sensors. That's (mostly) fine on my GH5S (10MP), but not on my GH3 or just about ANY other M43 camera (16-26MP). What I don't understand, is why companies like Tamron and Sigma don't just add another element (to focus on the M43 sensor, like a built-in Speedbooster) and an M43 mount on their APS-C lenses. I would think that it would be a fairly cheap way to get a pretty large new market and their lenses, at least on a $ for quality basis, really do beat most of the Panasonic lens lineup, especially at the prices they are charging. I'd bet they could charge $100+ more just for the "Speedbooster" improvement on focal distance and f-stop! Per M43 lens sold. I have a Metabones .64x Speedbooster (bundled with camera on eBay sale) that really is only useful with FF lenses (because of vignetting). And then I'm back to the lack of (good, for Panasonic) AF, and the weight and cost of FF lenses, even though I'd only buy used! Frankly, I'd be happy with just a straight M43 mount and appropriate focus on the sensor and LOSE the rest of the image circle (e.g. "cropped"). At least that way, we'd be getting the SHARPEST part of the image circle/lens focused on the sensor! I'd love to have an M43 mount Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8. Same for many of the wide-angle APS-C lenses. Double especially if I could get those lenses with OIS (for my GH5S). Of course, with the GH6, I wouldn't need stabilization. But I think Panasonic would be smart to license at least the Gen 1 OIS that is compatible with their IBIS. Then again, I really wish that there was true lens interoperability between Olympus and Panasonic M43 cameras. I'd LOVE to get the Olympus 12-100mm f/4.0 lens with compatible OIS. For "run and gun" that would be a dream on my GH5S! Anyway, my $.02...
I just love watching your almost Shakespearian delivery! And off course, the solid info 🍷 Love my GH5, G9 and S5 and the excellent 10~25 f1.7 Vario Summilux, all bought in 2021 just before the lockdowns, Now the GH6 beckons very loudly, thanks for your passion.
Hugh, I’m loved the micro 4/3 system and shot all Olympus pro lenses and even moved up to the EM1x but it’s Low light performance suffered. At the time I shot a lot to stage and concerts. Few years back I moved to sony full frame and sigma art and never regretted my decision. I’m still concerned on the sensor size but it’s good to see Panasonic moving the format forwards! I still miss the weather sealing of my Olympus gear. I one time dropped my em1x into a water fountain in Taiwan and after pulling it out and drying it off kept shooting. I miss that and wish others would make a rugged system like this.
@@3BMEP thanks Hugh! I admit I use to get onto the plane with a small almond shaped back pack with all my gear and I miss that. Now it’s back to a large roller.
I was a long time full frame shooter and absolutely love M4/3rds now. I have the EM1X too and last year had to shoot an opening ceremony for an Olympic training facility in Australia and the rain was pouring down. Even with my rain coat after 2 hours I was soaked through but I never stopped filming in the rain with the EM1X while ALL the photographers and news media were staying under tents far from where they wanted to be. All because I had full confidence in the Olympus weather sealing. When I read your fountain story I knew it was fine before you said :)
I’ll stick with my S5 now. Glad to see the improvements but I really wanted improved max iso for low light, extending the values past 12800 in video. This looks great for MFT shooters though.
@@andersistbesser when filming in public without a permit or in documentary work when you don’t want to scare animals or bring unneeded attention to yourself. It’s why the A7SIII exists too.
Good GH6 review of the best conventional camera but what about comparing to smart phone cameras? When I go out with family/travel and want to bring back pictures/video I choose between GH6 or smart phone even though I have a full array of conventional digital cameras of all types. I'm struggling to find a reason to lug around 4-6 pounds of GH6 gear vs 0.4 pounds of phone. If I'm planning on interview/storytelling I bring along a DJI OM5 gimbal which adds a pound of weight but also doubles as a tripod. As far as image quality over a wide range of conditions the newest Apple and Samsung phones compete well with GH6 in my experience Many of the most prolific UA-cam creators and increasing number of broadcast TV journalists have moved to smartphones as the image quality is great, and the convenience factor is a game changer. It would be interesting to see your take on this.
Yesterday I purchased the GH6 for video. So, What would I need to make the GH6 an indy filmmaker "A" cam? FYI, minus my Iphone (not a real camera), this is the first real SLR camera i've purchased in 20 yrs. Yashica FX2 (100% manual) & Canon Rebel TI (absolute trash). I loved my Yashica FX2.
Great video as always. After seeing around 25 videos about the LUMIX GH6 is said I didn’t see anything from you. Immediately You Tube showed your video.
Question: I own the GH5 and when I initially purchased it two years ago I planned on doing videography rather than stills. However, it turned out that I mostly do stills now (car photography). I have oftentimes contemplated whether it would have been better to go with a full frame camera (likely Sony's A73) in the first place, but already bought M4/3-lenses (Nocticron being my favorite amongst them). My question is, whether the GH6 would be a reasonable investment, stepping up from the GH5, or if I should rather go with a full frame in the long term? Thank you all in advance for your shared thoughts. Oh, and great, great video, @Three Blind Men and An Elephant, I genuinely love listening to your narration.
My primary concerns for the m43 format are a little different from most. Especially when it comes to photography, I am not worried about AF performance for anything except sports and wildlife, which we don’t do. I’m no longer that concerned about dynamic range, either after seeing dynamic range boost in action Instead, my concerns are a) sensor resolution being stalled well below 40 megapixels; and b) lenses not offering the size, weight, performance and value one can now get from full frame (as I mentioned). I do not see a comparable lens line 59 Sigma’s DG DN series: not the Nikkor Z’a, nor the Sony G-Masters. Interestingly, I am not enamored with Canon’s RF line (they are either too expensive with aperture’s faster than we need at one end of the spectrum, or simply too compromised at the consumer level for our tastes and use cases.
If you already own MFT lenses and are more focused in photography why don’t you consider the new olympus? 5 megapixels less but a true beast for quick shooting. Also if you are confortable with the size and weight of MFT lenses you’ll miss them a lot, FF lenses can be a real pain
@@3BMEP Megapixels won't stall below 40. I don't understand why people think they will. Phone sensors cram in 100mpx on sensors 1/8th the size of the m43 sensor. As those manufacturing techniques come up to scale it will be easy to produce a 100mpx plus m43 sensor. FF will break 100 in a few years I'm sure then head out to 200.
@@kthalas Smaller and lighter lenses for MFT is largely a myth. Consider e.g. run and gun universal zoom Olympus 12-100 f4. Tamron 28-200 f2.8-5.6 for full frame Sony is the same weight and size, less expensive and brighter throughout the range by from 1 to 3(!!!!) stops. Even if other lenses are smaller, the difference is usually not dramatic, and they always sacrifice light stops with respect to the full frame. Either smaller image circle is less of an advantage for lens design than many believe, or the manufacturers did not work hard enough to make smaller and faster lenses.
what about the GH5S then if your focus is Video, getting out on the streets and find interesting people and situations for making short film by? or the Black Magic 4k in comparison to the GH6? ...
You got my points. It is really hard for me to make the choice between FX3 and GH6. I do have A7R4 and 6 Sony lenses. But GH6 indeed has so many attractive aspects on professional video abilities. Especially a GH6+ a 12-60 f2.8-f4 combo is still much cheaper than FX3 or A7Siii. But, GH6 do lost the dual ISO and the dynamic range compared to the other two. But the 7.5 IBIS is a big deal. Even though I could use gimbal for FX3, but in many situations, handheld shot is very organic. It’s really hard to choose. Do you have any suggestions?
I’m thinking if I want to spend this kind of money I’m better off with full frame having zero investments on those lenses. Sony A7IV. The rolling shutter and worse stabilization would be the trade offs however. That AF though….. also Fujifilm has interested me for some time and I would have probably gotten a camera but they have been hard to come by the last couple of years. Try buying the X100V or X-S10 with the best kit lens.
I'm going to give up my GH3 and get a GH6. Not going to buy new Sony gear. The GH6 is going to be cinema camera monster . All the Sony people can talk about is Phase AF. It is like that is all that matters. Turn off the continuous AF. Maybe even manual focus! It is the whole package, but it is good to hear the AF is a lot better. The IBIS is huge too. Your point about this camera and indy filmmakers is right on. I don't blog or shoot weddings. I only make films. I'm going to subscribe to your channel.
two errors: 1. There is no dynamic range curve on photons to photos for the GH-6 yet. Canon R6 curve used? 2. Canon has 32mpx aps-c sensor, exceeding Fuji and Pentax at 26mpx.
Thanks for the eagerly awaited GH6 preliminary review Hugh. Having invested in the Panason MFT GH4, GH5 and G9 after putting the Canon IDX system to one side I would find it difficult to move back to a Full Frame system. For me it comes down to size, weight and cost, which really is the nub of of my decision making process these days as I am getting on in years. I'm a bit of a technocrat who pours over spec sheets for hours and I have come to the realization that no major camera manifacturer is able to offer a camera, which out performs all others. No one camera make or model is the panacea we would all like it to be. It all comes down to a compromise every time. Your video most eloquently demonstrates this very point when discussing Fuji, Sony, Canon, Nikon and others capabilities. Putting all the technicalities to one side for the moment I think it is fair to say that every one of the cameras you have mentioned are capable of producing outstanding results when in the creative hands of a compedent photographer. As always it comes down to what you can afford and what you can carry.
I have been wrestling with these questions since Monday's announcement. I immediately pre-ordered it, then had second thoughts. I wrestled with alternatives, first the S5, working my way up to the S1H. I really do love Panasonic. I love Canon as well but there is nothing viable to me at the price... their mirrorless cameras below the R5C all leave so much to be desired in the video features department and don't even get me started on Sony and their "cinema" cameras that lack even shutter angle. My go to DoP asked me what I'd do if money was no object, to which I replied that I'd probably buy a C70 and a separate camera for stills. But money is actually a consideration and I do have a bag full of native MFT glass, so my pre-order still stands although I fret over it.
It’s like it’s almost perfect but still not sure I want to invest in m43. Still have a GH5…. Got R6 and pretty happy, wish I could smash the 2 together. 2 things would have made me purchased. Phased auto focus and internal braw. I like the high frames rates but wouldn’t use that much. Prores is pointless for me. I have loads of cpu cores so not running a dinosaur.
I know you do mostly street photography. What I would like to know is if the hand held high res mode can hold a candle to the a7r4 in regular 60mp mode for landscape type use?
Honestly, if the GH6 had phase detect, it would be my perfect camera. I love the smaller size, the excellent ergonomics, the unbeatable IBIS, and the multitude of shooting capabilities. But I'm still buying it, so I guess I'm living proof that Panasonic doesn't need to change its autofocus system. I'm still a PanntBoy and I think I always will be.
Great video ... as always Hugh. You are the one that made change from Canon 1DX to Fujifilm ... and LOVE it ❤️ The question I was going to ask is how will the GH6 stack up to the XH2? Time will tell and hopefully not too long ...
The only reason that could prevent me from buying is the HDR bracketing settings called AEB. The GH4 shot brackets of 3,5, and 7 in increments of 1 EV or smaller. It needs to have steps of at least 2 EV for real estate. Could you tell me if the GH6 has AEB 5 @ 2EV??
All those frame rate resolutions and colour profiles choices for video are always very super confusing. What’s wrong with being able to do simple finished video ?
I concentrate on the right tool for what my client deliverables need to be and I find most are still happy with 1080p as I see that changing I will upgrade to newer tools. If I bought a new camera everytime one came out I would never make any money.
Is there an native or speedboosted one lens for event shooting alternative to the Leica 12-60 for micro four thirds? Ie: is there an adaptable lens that can match the 12-60’s field of view range? Thanks, Andrew
Good video. While I'm very happy that camera technology has evolved as much as it has, even cameras from 10 years ago can do a fantastic job if you don't mind giving up some features. The GH6 looks to be so damn good especially for the price. The feel to need something better is just great marketing by another camera maker. I am happy and grateful to be a G9 and Nocticron owner. I love using the system. The quality and features are more than good enough for anything I get paid to do now and the foreseeable future. Yes, I would love the extra 10% or so extra performance of more expensive cameras. But for that extra cost of the more expensive cameras, I can instead use that for a year's worth of marketing materials, portfolio shoots and schmoozing clients. This is going to get me work instead of that 10% of extra camera performance. But those Lumix S cameras are juicy. And don't get me started about Phase One ♥️
10 years I'm waiting for Pana to nail AF, I do handheld/IBIS interviews using AF all the time (pre/post covid 😁), I can't keep having my subjects go out of focus, pulsate, sorry.. So I am looking for OM-1 vs GH6 comparisons for 4K60 video performance especially handheld especially using AF.. also I'm not too enthusiastic to spend $750 more getting 3x 256GB CFexpress cards just to keep having backup recording..
@@tyronnezx yes the DR boost mode, the sharpness of 5.7k to 4k downscaling, prores, h265 (only 4:2:0 though, right?) all that is smoking hot. For sure. But what is the point when everything pulsates in and out of focus ALL THE TIME when using AF? Ok you may design particularly contrasty bright scenes in which the AF may behave more or less acceptably, as my G9 does in some situations, but as soon as things are getting shaky, handheld, lighting conditions get more dodgy and dark, subject and objects move uncontrolably trying to follow people and things around the scene, then the AF is possibly going to be as always with Panasonic, just horrible. So if I am to choose the OM-1, it's mainly going to be about the PDAF and the Dual SD backup recording. It being something like 30% lighter (?) is probably a bonus also..
@@charbax depends where your priorities really are. The current iteration of the Lumix GH6 is still a pre release version. There will be significant updates to bring it to the usual levels we see on the other GH cameras. The only way I know this is from the massive improvements I've seen on my S5 after Panasonic updated the CRA*p out of it. Personally, the idea of a 4K is image quality. That alone makes the Om-1 irrelevant. That DR-Boost function is patented and I'm surprised that no one else thought of it. The Lumix is a video beast and made purely for that. The Om-1 is for photos and maybe is a good G9 replacement
@@tyronnezx again yes, but I am tired of waiting, I have been angry at poor Panasonic AF performance for about a decade since I first bought a GH3, I've published thousands of videos since that lose focus due to Panasonic's totally unreliable AF. It's been such a waste. I understand DR boost, downsampled 5.7k to 4k, higher bitrate features and all those are amazing, but if they're always all out of focus, for me it becomes a useless camera. I just don't want pulsating footage anymore! So OM-1 might be perfect for me. I just need its 4K60 HLG in H265 with 10bit 4:2:0 to be extremely decent and definitely better than my G9 8bit 4k60 footage (when uploading directly to youtube) for it to be my possible next camera system.
@@charbax I don't understand your post. Being the professional you seem to be why have you not switched to Sony yrs ago. Or Olly/Fuji if you wanted to stick with M 4/3 lens
HUGH, ❤️ all your videos man! ...by the way, thank you very much for taking the time previously to write me back a couple of times, (I imagine) I truly appreciate that! Again very nicely balanced video and thought shared. Man, I could listen to you all day long! ...ever considered round table (in person) discussion with other camera UA-cam folks? NOW that would be intriguing and fun!! You guys could make it an annual thing and I think people would view, heck yeah they would. The GH6! Do you know how fast were you travelling when testing for rolling shutter? I have watched including your video now about 20 videos on the GH6. One interesting point I can now say (I should make video about this or someone should) people that have used the GH camera for video, embraced it and generally speak highly and honestly about the system with the exception of one UA-camr (naming no names here) I have observed their comments appear balance and fair. For those that are not coming from Panasonic GH5 I am not certain all their methods and approach arriving at their final decision is as accurate as they think or came up with. ...did that even make sense what I said? I own A7C, and A1 they are both wonderful especially the A1 with GM & G glass. At the same time I have a GH5. Did not jump into the GH5(II), that what's the point, since GH6 is coming and will be better (it is!) then I would be left GH5(II) to do what with? I suppose if I was getting into the GH series from start then the GH(II) could have been a good place to start. So now I have gone full frame. Can I even look back to 4/3 system? I ❤️ the GH5, ❤️ the GH5 glass I have, ❤️ the GH menu, Man I just ❤️ the camera even with it AF what it is and low light performance. I accept it where it is at. Could it ever meet or catch full frame now. R&D is going to full frame, we get it you said that 🟢HUGH Agreed! 4/3 system can catch APS-C . The big, massive question in my mind is this, 🔴"DOES IT TRULY MATTER?"🔴 Is the picture good enough or just right or totally super coming out of the GH6? It appears from all that I have seen, the GH6 picture is indeed that good. After all this, "just what the heck do I think based on your awesome video HUGH and all that i know?" The GH6 is still a very relevant very awesome camera. ...for film making it just might be the return of the king. I am still impartial and sure bias when it comes to GH series so my OPINION is not best not even close but darn I still love the GH system and with arrival of the GH6 I truly want it but right now i sit on the fence kind of. (leaning toward selling my GH5, holding my GH glass then perhaps (probably) getting a new king in my hands. 😁. OM-1 / Can you explain why do they get the AF right and they are too 4/3 system and do video? HUGH, thanks again for super video can not wait to see more on the topic and other.
Hey, Garfield. So glad you enjoy our videos! We were traveling between 30 and 40 mph (Claudia was driving, so I’m not sure), about the same speed when we tested a couple of Sony cameras including the RX10 along the same stretch of road a few years ago.😊🖖🏻
I can tell you I sold my A7IV for a GH5 knowing that the GH6 would come out sometime and I was right. So I can say that the A7IV seems really basic and not as "pro" as the GH6. The only thing "pro" about the A7IV is the price, that camera should be $1999 or same price as GH6 and see what happens.
Ok,so before I offer some facts ,I will say this is a camera i will take a great look at, hold it, mess with it, etc,etc.It seems they might have solved the issue of the crappy AF, and this one, unlike that EM1x farce, is not horribly overpriced. Now to the facts..I shot 4/3 the first time I went digital, and it was great, yet i remain puzzled why 4/3 shooters feel the need to always compare with FF and APS-C, because frankly, ff, medium format, and APS-C is not worried about 4/3. It's a defensive posture which goes nowhere, because the sales numbers/CIPA numbers speak for themselves, as far as what people shoot professionally with. Of course we can say, I can say something is just as good because I like it and use it, which makes sense in those people's minds, yet the hard fact is, this is a BUSINESS, not a popularity contest. These companies that are in the top 4 are there for a reason, because that's what the world needs. People buy Jordans because the y like them, not because they are the best bang for the buck or built better. If I had the funds, I might have a GH6, Z9, A1, cinema cameras, and a host of gear, yet like most people, I have what i NEED.I just bought 2 small cameras, not because I cry and whine about weight, size, and expense, yet i NEEDED something I can shove in my pocket, use in skating rinks, has IBIS, has great AF, and has unlimited recording time to live stream. Now that I have that i can get something bigger with similar specs and fills the boxes for me. If GH6 cameras and those like it were the same standards, then the professional shooters would be clamoring to them and they would have the same demand the Nikon d850 and Canon M50 did. I believe that each format has it's merits and they should be praised and compared to similar products, for logic's sake alone, instead of anecdotal instances and stories, as if we cannot shoot 4/3, medium format, film, and full frame, by the same person.
I have the A7iv, and it doesn't have Product Showcase. I just looked on the Sony site for a firmware update, but there's nothing new. So, why does your video show "Product showcase" when displaying your A7iv footage?
@@3BMEP Thank you so much for getting back to me...I really appreciate it. IF you don't mind...can I ask you one more question? I'm going to retire at the end of this year and want to get into producing 3-5 minute short videos by using a combination of Video clips, interviews, Still shots and even some drone footage as I just passed the FAA Part 107 Test. The Videos will be of things that interest me around town and surrounding communities and non profits and fun interesting stories to tell. So I'm thinking a Highbred Camera and I keep upping the game the more I learn. I started out looking at the G9 then the GH6...Now the S5II and the S5II X In your last response you indicated the S5II would be your choice. Based on what I told you I want to do would that recommendation still hold true? Thank you so much for your input and the content you put out. I'm a BIG FAN!!!! Jim G.
Excellent question, and the answer is ‘no.’ The longer answer: doesn’t matter. The full answer: it doesn’t matter because the IBIS systems in the bodies for which the Sigma 85 and 90 (and Tamron 28-75) were designed are sufficiently performant. Lens IS matters most at longer focal lengths.
@@3BMEP Thank you. Well, some of us bought into Lumix or Olympus precisely to get the best stabilisation possible and OIS gives clear benefits even at focal lengths like 50mm (FF equiv) in cameras with better IBIS than any FF camera. Hence I suppose the key word is "sufficiently", with a footnote saying "for my needs". Not that I'm saying lens stabilisation makes up for the price, but it is definitely something to consider.
I'll finally upgrade from the GH4. This is what I've been waiting for. I don't give a damn about full frame. It's too big, too heavy, too expensive, too noticeable and too intrusive for what I need to do. I don't want to be noticed when working. I want to be perceived as a tourist or an amateur, so I can fly under the radar and get the images I want to make, or the video I want to use. I'll gladly trade the attributes of the full frame systems for what Lumix put into the GH6. It isn't perfect. Nothing is. But it is a huge improvement on what''s come before. I like to think about the story I'm telling, not the technology I'm fighting. Panasonic's interfaces (menu and hardware) just work. They're like Macs and Toyotas. Everything is where it makes sense to find it.
I lost count of how many times people were shocked my photos were taken with "only" a M4/3 camera. 99% of the people who see your photos don't even know what full frame means and can't tell a difference.
@@jclcreativephotovideo Exactly. In the end, its the result that counts. I also shoot M43 and I am blown away sometimes by the results I get.
Using the Leica Noctocron 42.5m 1.2 has been such a gorgeous addition to what we do, and surprisingly, we use it a TON for video, as well as photos 😍
That’s the lens that broke the internet
@@BarryMaskell watch tower of Turkey?
I'm a pretty happy GH5 user since almost 5 years and this is really a huge step up. Since I'm using the camera a lot while traveling by bicycle, I need a small setup with small lenses and equipment that fits on the bike. IBIS is extremely important to me. But even more, I think the Panasonic has the perfect user interface to get things done and avoid stupid mistakes that ruins shots that can't be reproduced. The GH5-II has already a lot of improvements over the GH5 in this area and the GH6 is even better. So for me it looks like a no brainer.
I want to VLOG & use the camera also for beautiful travel nature scenaries. So do you think the GH6 would be the right pick for me? I am very curious about the autofocus. So I struggle with my decision a lot, if GH6 or Sony a7IV. What do you think?
@@Fbnt1 I think for travel with landscapes and cities, the AF is good enough. I film a lot like I take a picture that are moving. Larger DOF, AF-S and holding steady or following an object into a pan move. If you want to show your face with blurry background a lot, there might be a problem but I'm not sure about that. I saw videos with heavy vibrating AF and I saw videos without it. I usually set the AF to very slow because I want slow AF-movements like a manual focus puller would do it. Even the GH5 isn't that bad in this area. If you want to focus on birds in flight, running dogs or fast moving sports, the AF isn't that good.
Sony's AF is way better for everything that moves faster but the good lenses are heavy and expensive and the video features are not that good. The GH6 4k120p is great and up to FHD 300p is also great. All with 10bit and without crop (or with crop if you want the additional reach). SO it depends on you needs.
As a cyclist, I have an action cam or an 360° cam for filming myself and fast action. This is on a completely different level of stabilization and the AF is fixed from near to infinity. Works for me.
The biggest mistake Panasonic made yet again was not having a phase detect AF system. No matter how beautiful the image, it’s absolutely useless when out of focus. Save your money and keep your GH5. It’s still a great camera.
@@Fbnt1 As someone who owns a GH5 and A7S3, buy the A7IV and don’t look back. It’s better in virtually every way (except for IBIs) and it’s lighter which is better for vlogging. Another important note is that the GH6 may very well be Panasonic’s last MFT’s camera.
If you have panny glass, get the gh6. It's a no brainer for improved ibis and af with great video codecs. If photography is your primary game look at dumping panny and moving to one of the big 3. Fuji is great but apsc is not as flexible for photos. If it was me i would stick with panny as they have the best video capabilities and the gh6 improves the photos. You can always move to another system when they catch up on the video side
I chose the OM1 as my new toy and tool. In my opinion a very interesting option capable of almost everything, perfect AF, weather sealed, durable, reliable and with a PERFECT customer service here in Germany.
Germany are leaders at customer service and engineering
Will the Panasonic 10 - 25mm auto focus like a native lens on the 0M1.
The focal range is just right for me.
@@markshirley01 for me too! I would love to see the 10-25 AF working perfectly! It would make possible to me to sell a lot of prime lenses!
A very long time coming and the improvements are very welcomed, but my trusty GH5 Mk 1 is still a video powerhouse that I am very happy with :)
I'm still a BMPCC 4K user, I still love the quality of the video from it, and I still get things done without it having any IBIS or continuous autofocus. I don't think I'm ready for this GH6, but it sure has a lot of advances. Any camera that does 4:2:2 is my friend. There's a UA-camr who directly compared the GH6 output with A7S III output and the GH6 was superior is most instances.
Not getting rid of my bmpcc 6k for this. Dream on.
As someone invested in mft and was planning on adding gh5s’ to my collection, the GH6 is now a fairly easy choice. The improved colour is very pleasing.
When we coming back to the GH6?
the best and most serious camera. I love Panasonic. And your videos as well. I ll buy two GH6 one for everyday use and one for my collection. I am thrilled!
Been refreshing this channel for the GH6 updates since it's initial announcement! As always, you never disappoint. Thank you so much!
Our pleasure!
I will not give up unlimited recording, long live battery and not problem with the temperature .... so long live Lumix gh!
I love how you suggest that the differences in sensor performance should be considered in actual use with compensations for depth of field. One additional point on this is to also consider dynamic range in this category, since most sensors have greater dynamic range at lower ISO values. Just checked the GH5M2 against the Z9 and R3, and when you compensate for a 2 stop reduction in ISO, the smaller format actually has greater dynamic range.
👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻😊🖖🏻
I LOVE your analysis and comparisons with other cameras. The best GH6 review on UA-cam. Cheers!
Thanks, man! 😊🖖🏻
I'm happy with my GH6 purchase and G9 to compliment it. Another great review with your unique perspective.
Excellent combo - enjoy!
I just got mine at a sale price of $1,600 and even coming from a GH5 (which is still a great camera), this GH6 footage is noticeably better. I didn't think I would care about little things like the tilt of the screen but I use it constantly. And I get to use all my current lenses which I really love. All around an amazing value.
Nicely done!
I did switch from Sony A7R3 and A7S3 to GH5S and GH6..not looking back..great cameras
Yes, the X-H2 is the decisive factor. Panasonic and Fuji worked on the organic sensor with twin exposure levels, and it looks like this uses the same principles or techniques learned during that process. Perhaps Fuji will have similar capabilities. The GH6 image looks remarkably good - at least with good lenses.
Oh? Thanks for the fence footage. Wow. Love it when Panasonic throws in these wrenches to my future buying decisions.
Can't count the lost footage to jello-slanted trees etc from pans. You're A74 (comparison) comments are spot on.....spot on. We live in a fantastic time.
😊🖖🏻
I love my G9, but I got it for US$800 new. $2200 is too expensive an upgrade for me for 4K120 if AF is not much better. I'm going to get a full frame rig, FX3 or A7c, and play with both systems.
With the GH5/G9 generation, its arguable that Panasonic has already reached a good level/balance for m4/3 and any improvements vs price increase is likely to be marginal. Seems like this is being borne out with the GH6
@@rapier84 Yes, and shame about PDAF.
I won’t sell my m4/3 gear but after moving into Sony FF with the A7c, a7S3 and a7iv - it’s hard to make a case for me in 2022 to buy a GH6. I would of spent my money with Panasonic if the GH6 had arrived 2 years sooner.
I understand.
*Thank you for at least acknowledging this micro-four-thirds sensored camera's superior higher video resolution than any other mft camera thus far. Almost all of the reviews I've seen on the GH6 have been by reviewers who are mysteriously clamming up about the simple fact the GH6 can shoot in ProRes 5.7K 4:2:2 10 bit video and 5.8K in open gate 4:3, which, if you need to shoot video for multiple release formats, such as Tik-Tok, Twitter, and others, gives you multiple choices in framing in post ! What other MFT format camera offers this level of flexibility ?*
I'm adapting EF glass via sigma after migrating Canon>Sony>Panasonic, all FF. The benefits of the form factor matched with price are a big selling point. As well as the ability to pick up a couple of auto focus lenses relatively inexpensively for gimbal. This looks like a fantastic compliment to the S1. Loving that camera!
Thank you for your review, the GH6 is definetly not a disapointment. Hoping Panasonic update/ release an S1H (Mk2?). The S1H was so impressive, Panasonic stands out of the crowd when it comes to features. The autofocus aside, although much improved for those who might rely on it, a new full frame camera would be a very welcomed release.
One other point, camera manufactures should not hold back on announcing future developmenta. It gives users an option to hold back on making purchases, often with regrets, you read these often in comments. My final comment, we should master the tech we have, share and change the world with stories. When you look back at photography and film, much of the story telling is so captivating. Personally don't ever remember thinking 'What camera did they use to capture that!' Hope that makese sense, thank you.
It does!
Great review as usual! One thing I would add is for some of us, smaller lens size of M4/3 is also a big deal. For example, I shoot in South Africa every so often and am an older guy who doesn't care to haul around a ton of heavy, bulky lenses. When in South Africa, I shoot in townships where a large big name brand camera says "steal me". Not so much with a Pan M4/3 camera.
For anamorphic there is nothing better at this price. Also the used market has a lot of great cinema and m43 lenses that can be picked up very reasonably. The gh6 is a no brainer for video. Less for photography where new glass and high res ff has an advantage
I'm pretty happy with my 32.5mp Canon 90D, The video options of that GH6 is pretty sweet and for a really good price I think.
Hugh, you are a master at this, bravo.... However as an owner of two Sony cameras one is a PXW Z280 camcorder, A7rII and 2-GH4's if I stick to a psychology and tell myself to concentrate on storytelling and not all the hype of new cameras "it can be hard" I find myself working with older cameras to do my job very well. Of course I would love to have new cameras and I find myself looking at them every day but by the time I consider things like adding new lights to my studio and a host of other things to help my storytelling new cameras seem to push to the back of the line as far as new purchases and I'm OK with that.I concentrate on the right tool for what my client deliverables need to be and I find most are still happy with 1080p as I see that changing I will upgrade to newer tools. If I bought a new camera everytime one came out I would never make any money. I am amazed at my GH4's from 2014 that work like slaves in my studio and don't miss a beat however in the words of Hugh Brownstone your mileage may vary.
Wonderful perspective - thank you for sharing! 😊🖖🏻👍🏻
Yeah most clients now still want 1080p. 4k is for huge screen. 5.7k and above are just for editing.
For our productions we usually use a Sony FX9, but if I would ever need one package to do both video and stills in a travel-friendly way, this would be that one! I’ve recently had a go with the GH5II and the 10-25 Summilux and I was deeply impressed already. Combine this GH6 with both the 10-25, the 25-50 and a rig and you’re in business. What I love about Panasonic is that it might not always be the best spec’ed overall (with the exception of this GH6), it is always well-designed, rugged and beautifully build with professional use in mind. From software to hardware. I’m using the Z7II myself, but everytime I pick up an S1R I notice it’s a the different level of durability.
PS. You’re so right to put this DOF hype in perspective. So many people think that you need at least f1.2 to get a good headshot…
😊🖖🏻
@hugh hit the nail on the head in the last minute of the video. The Panasonic GH6 is a pro tool for pro videographers who purchase equipment that upgrades their workflow significantly and then beat the crap out of them for literal years. My father owned a broadcast television studio and considered his gear to be little more than scrap metal, if it was not actively working, bringing in revenue and creating visuals. He would have appreciated the GH6 if it made his life easier by being robust, reliable and operationally sound and manageable.
TL;DR autofocus isn't everything to everyone.
daaaaamnn dude!! ..watafc with you!! ...my brain is on 🔥 fire!! ..what a speech!! daaamn!! ..a bunch of reason, facts, examples with real context.. hard and haevy words!! ..i have 2 GH6 my work is 50/50 vids & photos.. now i feel more close to my gh6's ..😢.. thanks for this clear-thinking-exercise!! ...blessings from Mexico
😊🖖🏻
This talk about the gh6 is just....just amazing...the best one!
🙏🏻😊🖖🏻
Very nice review! One small point though: camera choice for me is dictated by years of lens acquisition, new and second hand. Changing systems is not a decision lightly taken... So, although a camera may have some negative points, as long as there are no game-stoppers, one tends to remain in the system invested in. Look forward to your in depth review of the GH6!
Why should I consider the GH6 over the LUMIX s5? What’s the biggest difference?
Megapixels don't matter. Not anymore anyhow. I printed 30 by 40 inch prints from 10MP RAW files taken with MFT cameras from 2010 - taken with a legacy SLR lens from the 1960s.
Nobody will notice the slight differences in optical performance in the lenses you talked about. Diminishing returns.
What matters today is ergonomics, usability, build quality, color science, reliability in the field etc.
I was also able to try out the new camera here in Hungary, and I agree with all your words.
👍🏻😉
Micro 4/3rds is back baby!
Thank you for the video. I am very interested in this camera for starting some UA-cam videos and you make it very clear!
I would love to own a gh6 but they ditched the vertical grip option. I really dont know why. For filming its great because of the added weight and for hybrid shooters who take a lot of portraits a grip is essential.. the grip thing is the only reason i will buy another camera instead
I love Panasonic for still continuing with the GH line of video centric hybrids, what there providing me with in the GH6 is wonderfully bonkers at a price I can afford…ish. Thumbs up 👍 fella.
😊🙏🏻🖖🏻
Great commentary! I'm still on board with my GH5, but happy to see that there is more MFT gear out there.
I have the Leica 8-18, the Leica 12-60 and the Summilux 12mm.
For challenging low light shots, I have a Nikkon mount 0.64 Metabons 50mm F1.4.
Having a great time with my gear and this will be my setup for quite a while. We're aiming for Summer of 2023 to come Statside and visit relatives in Brooklyn.
I know you have a hectic schedule, but I'd sure love to follow you around the city one day when we're there.
I'd be delighted to return the favor for you here in Stockholm too!
Best wishes from Sweden.
Always love your reviews. Look forward to more GH6!
😊🙏🏻🖖🏻
I never miss your reviews. This will be a superb storytelling tool.
😊🙏🏻🖖🏻
I like the MFT system.
Saw this many moons ago but seriously impressive review effort on GH6 Hugh! Anybody? I just got a slightly used GH6 and love it. What are your favorite features any of GH6 firmware updates have brought to end users?
I have a A7SIII and A7III which am super happy with it. Also a GH5 that I got for $700 with $80 25mm f1.7 lens. I’m am set. I do think the GH5/GH6 are more cinematic film cameras oppose to Sony cameras that seem more for commercial work. I would definitely get a GH6 over Blackmagic camera since it has amazing IBIS and autofocus.
You mean the GH5 II Right?
@@thewalkingvloggingman7152 both
Wonderful review. Your videos are always so well thought out and articulated so eloquently. I'm an existing Lumix shooter and the GH6 is looking like a great upgrade, though I think I'll wait until May to see what Fujifilm has in store before I invest more into the M/43 system. But the GH6 really is making it a tough choice for everyone in the sub-2500 price range shooting video.
😊🙏🏻🖖🏻
For daily vlogging, which is best…GH6 or Sony A7 IV? I can’t decide.
I agree with much of what you've said. Especially with the lens selections. I have original 12-35mm f/2.8, 35-100mm f/28, and misc other manual M43 lenses. And the original f/2.8 pair are mostly made with the resolving power of 9-12MP sensors. That's (mostly) fine on my GH5S (10MP), but not on my GH3 or just about ANY other M43 camera (16-26MP).
What I don't understand, is why companies like Tamron and Sigma don't just add another element (to focus on the M43 sensor, like a built-in Speedbooster) and an M43 mount on their APS-C lenses. I would think that it would be a fairly cheap way to get a pretty large new market and their lenses, at least on a $ for quality basis, really do beat most of the Panasonic lens lineup, especially at the prices they are charging. I'd bet they could charge $100+ more just for the "Speedbooster" improvement on focal distance and f-stop! Per M43 lens sold.
I have a Metabones .64x Speedbooster (bundled with camera on eBay sale) that really is only useful with FF lenses (because of vignetting). And then I'm back to the lack of (good, for Panasonic) AF, and the weight and cost of FF lenses, even though I'd only buy used!
Frankly, I'd be happy with just a straight M43 mount and appropriate focus on the sensor and LOSE the rest of the image circle (e.g. "cropped"). At least that way, we'd be getting the SHARPEST part of the image circle/lens focused on the sensor!
I'd love to have an M43 mount Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8. Same for many of the wide-angle APS-C lenses. Double especially if I could get those lenses with OIS (for my GH5S). Of course, with the GH6, I wouldn't need stabilization. But I think Panasonic would be smart to license at least the Gen 1 OIS that is compatible with their IBIS.
Then again, I really wish that there was true lens interoperability between Olympus and Panasonic M43 cameras. I'd LOVE to get the Olympus 12-100mm f/4.0 lens with compatible OIS. For "run and gun" that would be a dream on my GH5S!
Anyway, my $.02...
Your $0.02 much appreciated; thanks for taking the time to share.
I just love watching your almost Shakespearian delivery!
And off course, the solid info 🍷
Love my GH5, G9 and S5 and the excellent 10~25 f1.7 Vario Summilux, all bought in 2021 just before the lockdowns,
Now the GH6 beckons very loudly, thanks for your passion.
🙏🏻😊🖖🏻 Enjoy!
Hugh, I’m loved the micro 4/3 system and shot all Olympus pro lenses and even moved up to the EM1x but it’s Low light performance suffered. At the time I shot a lot to stage and concerts. Few years back I moved to sony full frame and sigma art and never regretted my decision. I’m still concerned on the sensor size but it’s good to see Panasonic moving the format forwards! I still miss the weather sealing of my Olympus gear. I one time dropped my em1x into a water fountain in Taiwan and after pulling it out and drying it off kept shooting. I miss that and wish others would make a rugged system like this.
Thanks for sharing your experience!
@@3BMEP thanks Hugh! I admit I use to get onto the plane with a small almond shaped back pack with all my gear and I miss that. Now it’s back to a large roller.
I was a long time full frame shooter and absolutely love M4/3rds now. I have the EM1X too and last year had to shoot an opening ceremony for an Olympic training facility in Australia and the rain was pouring down. Even with my rain coat after 2 hours I was soaked through but I never stopped filming in the rain with the EM1X while ALL the photographers and news media were staying under tents far from where they wanted to be. All because I had full confidence in the Olympus weather sealing. When I read your fountain story I knew it was fine before you said :)
“I’m still concerned about the sensor size…”
The sensor size *is* the benefit of micro4/3.🤦🏼♂️
I’ll stick with my S5 now. Glad to see the improvements but I really wanted improved max iso for low light, extending the values past 12800 in video. This looks great for MFT shooters though.
Who needs more iso than 12800? Film makers light their shots
@@andersistbesser when filming in public without a permit or in documentary work when you don’t want to scare animals or bring unneeded attention to yourself. It’s why the A7SIII exists too.
A fair, well thought out reflection of the GH6. Refreshing. Thank you!
🙏🏻😊🖖🏻
Your reviews are so informative and entertaining it’s mine blowing you don’t have at least 500.000 subs.
😊😎🖖🏻
Internal raw, even in standard HD is the missing piece.
Good GH6 review of the best conventional camera but what about comparing to smart phone cameras? When I go out with family/travel and want to bring back pictures/video I choose between GH6 or smart phone even though I have a full array of conventional digital cameras of all types. I'm struggling to find a reason to lug around 4-6 pounds of GH6 gear vs 0.4 pounds of phone. If I'm planning on interview/storytelling I bring along a DJI OM5 gimbal which adds a pound of weight but also doubles as a tripod. As far as image quality over a wide range of conditions the newest Apple and Samsung phones compete well with GH6 in my experience Many of the most prolific UA-cam creators and increasing number of broadcast TV journalists have moved to smartphones as the image quality is great, and the convenience factor is a game changer. It would be interesting to see your take on this.
No jitter & judder problem when filming and following/panning moving subjects, like the GH5 suffers from?
Definitely going to be my A cam with my Nikon zfc my b cam. Great video
😊🙏🏻🖖🏻
Yesterday I purchased the GH6 for video. So, What would I need to make the GH6 an indy filmmaker "A" cam? FYI, minus my Iphone (not a real camera), this is the first real SLR camera i've purchased in 20 yrs. Yashica FX2 (100% manual) & Canon Rebel TI (absolute trash). I loved my Yashica FX2.
All you need to make it an A cam is to fully understand it - enjoy!
Hey! That GH6 is not an SLR (Single-Lens Reflex) nor a digital one (DSLR) but a mirrorless digital camera. Enjoy!
Great video as always. After seeing around 25 videos about the LUMIX GH6 is said I didn’t see anything from you. Immediately You Tube showed your video.
😊🖖🏻
Looking forward to the much anticipated GH6-AFW (auto-focus works)
Question: I own the GH5 and when I initially purchased it two years ago I planned on doing videography rather than stills. However, it turned out that I mostly do stills now (car photography). I have oftentimes contemplated whether it would have been better to go with a full frame camera (likely Sony's A73) in the first place, but already bought M4/3-lenses (Nocticron being my favorite amongst them).
My question is, whether the GH6 would be a reasonable investment, stepping up from the GH5, or if I should rather go with a full frame in the long term?
Thank you all in advance for your shared thoughts.
Oh, and great, great video, @Three Blind Men and An Elephant, I genuinely love listening to your narration.
My primary concerns for the m43 format are a little different from most. Especially when it comes to photography, I am not worried about AF performance for anything except sports and wildlife, which we don’t do. I’m no longer that concerned about dynamic range, either after seeing dynamic range boost in action Instead, my concerns are a) sensor resolution being stalled well below 40 megapixels; and b) lenses not offering the size, weight, performance and value one can now get from full frame (as I mentioned). I do not see a comparable lens line 59 Sigma’s DG DN series: not the Nikkor Z’a, nor the Sony G-Masters. Interestingly, I am not enamored with Canon’s RF line (they are either too expensive with aperture’s faster than we need at one end of the spectrum, or simply too compromised at the consumer level for our tastes and use cases.
If you already own MFT lenses and are more focused in photography why don’t you consider the new olympus? 5 megapixels less but a true beast for quick shooting. Also if you are confortable with the size and weight of MFT lenses you’ll miss them a lot, FF lenses can be a real pain
@@3BMEP Megapixels won't stall below 40. I don't understand why people think they will. Phone sensors cram in 100mpx on sensors 1/8th the size of the m43 sensor. As those manufacturing techniques come up to scale it will be easy to produce a 100mpx plus m43 sensor. FF will break 100 in a few years I'm sure then head out to 200.
@@kthalas Smaller and lighter lenses for MFT is largely a myth. Consider e.g. run and gun universal zoom Olympus 12-100 f4. Tamron 28-200 f2.8-5.6 for full frame Sony is the same weight and size, less expensive and brighter throughout the range by from 1 to 3(!!!!) stops. Even if other lenses are smaller, the difference is usually not dramatic, and they always sacrifice light stops with respect to the full frame. Either smaller image circle is less of an advantage for lens design than many believe, or the manufacturers did not work hard enough to make smaller and faster lenses.
@@AVerkhovsky ok, then it’s a myth supported by real products. Yeeeep
what about the GH5S then if your focus is Video, getting out on the streets and find interesting people and situations for making short film by? or the Black Magic 4k in comparison to the GH6? ...
The Jordan Peterson of camera Reviews...the Great One...Brother Brownstone. Thanks for another masterpiece. 👍
😊🖖🏻
You got my points. It is really hard for me to make the choice between FX3 and GH6. I do have A7R4 and 6 Sony lenses. But GH6 indeed has so many attractive aspects on professional video abilities. Especially a GH6+ a 12-60 f2.8-f4 combo is still much cheaper than FX3 or A7Siii. But, GH6 do lost the dual ISO and the dynamic range compared to the other two. But the 7.5 IBIS is a big deal. Even though I could use gimbal for FX3, but in many situations, handheld shot is very organic. It’s really hard to choose. Do you have any suggestions?
It punches pretty hard for a little tike
I’m thinking if I want to spend this kind of money I’m better off with full frame having zero investments on those lenses. Sony A7IV. The rolling shutter and worse stabilization would be the trade offs however. That AF though….. also Fujifilm has interested me for some time and I would have probably gotten a camera but they have been hard to come by the last couple of years. Try buying the X100V or X-S10 with the best kit lens.
I'm going to give up my GH3 and get a GH6. Not going to buy new Sony gear. The GH6 is going to be cinema camera monster . All the Sony people can talk about is Phase AF. It is like that is all that matters. Turn off the continuous AF. Maybe even manual focus! It is the whole package, but it is good to hear the AF is a lot better. The IBIS is huge too.
Your point about this camera and indy filmmakers is right on. I don't blog or shoot weddings. I only make films. I'm going to subscribe to your channel.
Welcome!
Great video as always Hugh! Did you notice and of that wicked bright streaking/banding/bloomiing that Gerald Undone saw of his GH6?
None, Cliff - but we most likely would never shoot with those particular conditions. So glad we have Gerald for his thoroughness!
Interesting camera.
two errors: 1. There is no dynamic range curve on photons to photos for the GH-6 yet. Canon R6 curve used? 2. Canon has 32mpx aps-c sensor, exceeding Fuji and Pentax at 26mpx.
1) I didn’t assert the GH6 was on the chart: I DID use the GH5 II as a proxy. 2) you are right about the Canon, thanks for the correction.
For Anamophic on a budget, it seems the way to go.
Man, I’m torn up by this video! Great presentation as usual. Im just so confused on what I want to buy again (maybe it’ll never stop).
😎😊🖖🏻
“Micro four thirds is dead.”
“Panasonic will never make a GH6.”
😂🤣
Thanks for the eagerly awaited GH6 preliminary review Hugh. Having invested in the Panason MFT GH4, GH5 and G9 after putting the Canon IDX system to one side I would find it difficult to move back to a Full Frame system. For me it comes down to size, weight and cost, which really is the nub of of my decision making process these days as I am getting on in years. I'm a bit of a technocrat who pours over spec sheets for hours and I have come to the realization that no major camera manifacturer is able to offer a camera, which out performs all others. No one camera make or model is the panacea we would all like it to be. It all comes down to a compromise every time. Your video most eloquently demonstrates this very point when discussing Fuji, Sony, Canon, Nikon and others capabilities. Putting all the technicalities to one side for the moment I think it is fair to say that every one of the cameras you have mentioned are capable of producing outstanding results when in the creative hands of a compedent photographer. As always it comes down to what you can afford and what you can carry.
Just so, William!
I have been wrestling with these questions since Monday's announcement. I immediately pre-ordered it, then had second thoughts. I wrestled with alternatives, first the S5, working my way up to the S1H. I really do love Panasonic. I love Canon as well but there is nothing viable to me at the price... their mirrorless cameras below the R5C all leave so much to be desired in the video features department and don't even get me started on Sony and their "cinema" cameras that lack even shutter angle. My go to DoP asked me what I'd do if money was no object, to which I replied that I'd probably buy a C70 and a separate camera for stills. But money is actually a consideration and I do have a bag full of native MFT glass, so my pre-order still stands although I fret over it.
Let me know how you feel after you’ve had the camera in hand and used it?
@@3BMEP You've got it. :)
@@riparianstudiosSo, what was the outcome of your GH6 acquisition? Are you enjoying its performance?
It’s like it’s almost perfect but still not sure I want to invest in m43. Still have a GH5…. Got R6 and pretty happy, wish I could smash the 2 together. 2 things would have made me purchased. Phased auto focus and internal braw. I like the high frames rates but wouldn’t use that much. Prores is pointless for me. I have loads of cpu cores so not running a dinosaur.
Well at current price of $1290 for gh6 at Amazon it makes it hard to pass on
Is this Camera better in terms of video than a Sony a7S III?
I know you do mostly street photography. What I would like to know is if the hand held high res mode can hold a candle to the a7r4 in regular 60mp mode for landscape type use?
If the landscape is sufficiently still, yes: the gating factor becomes the lens.
Honestly, if the GH6 had phase detect, it would be my perfect camera. I love the smaller size, the excellent ergonomics, the unbeatable IBIS, and the multitude of shooting capabilities.
But I'm still buying it, so I guess I'm living proof that Panasonic doesn't need to change its autofocus system. I'm still a PanntBoy and I think I always will be.
😉👍🏻
What is the best lens for POV on Panasonic Lumix GH6?
Amazing.😍
Superb video as always! Regards Ulf (would like to see the specs in a GX8 mkII)
Thank you, Ulf!
Can't wait for the GH6S or whatever they have planned. This has gotten me quite excited!
Hi there. Great video. I was wondering how to get video into my iPad. Just doesn't recognise video files. Any tips please
I haven’t used My iPad in awhile for video editing. Just too Rube Goldberg-esque at least: for me, for now. 😎
A video autofocus system that still can't be relied on because its not phase detect, hold that thought!
Great video ... as always Hugh. You are the one that made change from Canon 1DX to Fujifilm ... and LOVE it ❤️ The question I was going to ask is how will the GH6 stack up to the XH2? Time will tell and hopefully not too long ...
The only reason that could prevent me from buying is the HDR bracketing settings called AEB. The GH4 shot brackets of 3,5, and 7 in increments of 1 EV or smaller. It needs to have steps of at least 2 EV for real estate. Could you tell me if the GH6 has AEB 5 @ 2EV??
All those frame rate resolutions and colour profiles choices for video are always very super confusing. What’s wrong with being able to do simple finished video ?
It was never simple. There are so many codecs out there and each stage of a workflow will be using different video formats.
I concentrate on the right tool for what my client deliverables need to be and I find most are still happy with 1080p as I see that changing I will upgrade to newer tools. If I bought a new camera everytime one came out I would never make any money.
Is there an native or speedboosted one lens for event shooting alternative to the Leica 12-60 for micro four thirds? Ie: is there an adaptable lens that can match the 12-60’s field of view range? Thanks, Andrew
Good video. While I'm very happy that camera technology has evolved as much as it has, even cameras from 10 years ago can do a fantastic job if you don't mind giving up some features. The GH6 looks to be so damn good especially for the price. The feel to need something better is just great marketing by another camera maker.
I am happy and grateful to be a G9 and Nocticron owner. I love using the system. The quality and features are more than good enough for anything I get paid to do now and the foreseeable future. Yes, I would love the extra 10% or so extra performance of more expensive cameras. But for that extra cost of the more expensive cameras, I can instead use that for a year's worth of marketing materials, portfolio shoots and schmoozing clients. This is going to get me work instead of that 10% of extra camera performance.
But those Lumix S cameras are juicy. And don't get me started about Phase One ♥️
10 years I'm waiting for Pana to nail AF, I do handheld/IBIS interviews using AF all the time (pre/post covid 😁), I can't keep having my subjects go out of focus, pulsate, sorry.. So I am looking for OM-1 vs GH6 comparisons for 4K60 video performance especially handheld especially using AF.. also I'm not too enthusiastic to spend $750 more getting 3x 256GB CFexpress cards just to keep having backup recording..
You know darn well that the GH6 will smoke OM-1 for 4k 60
@@tyronnezx yes the DR boost mode, the sharpness of 5.7k to 4k downscaling, prores, h265 (only 4:2:0 though, right?) all that is smoking hot. For sure. But what is the point when everything pulsates in and out of focus ALL THE TIME when using AF? Ok you may design particularly contrasty bright scenes in which the AF may behave more or less acceptably, as my G9 does in some situations, but as soon as things are getting shaky, handheld, lighting conditions get more dodgy and dark, subject and objects move uncontrolably trying to follow people and things around the scene, then the AF is possibly going to be as always with Panasonic, just horrible. So if I am to choose the OM-1, it's mainly going to be about the PDAF and the Dual SD backup recording. It being something like 30% lighter (?) is probably a bonus also..
@@charbax depends where your priorities really are. The current iteration of the Lumix GH6 is still a pre release version. There will be significant updates to bring it to the usual levels we see on the other GH cameras. The only way I know this is from the massive improvements I've seen on my S5 after Panasonic updated the CRA*p out of it. Personally, the idea of a 4K is image quality. That alone makes the Om-1 irrelevant. That DR-Boost function is patented and I'm surprised that no one else thought of it. The Lumix is a video beast and made purely for that. The Om-1 is for photos and maybe is a good G9 replacement
@@tyronnezx again yes, but I am tired of waiting, I have been angry at poor Panasonic AF performance for about a decade since I first bought a GH3, I've published thousands of videos since that lose focus due to Panasonic's totally unreliable AF. It's been such a waste. I understand DR boost, downsampled 5.7k to 4k, higher bitrate features and all those are amazing, but if they're always all out of focus, for me it becomes a useless camera. I just don't want pulsating footage anymore! So OM-1 might be perfect for me. I just need its 4K60 HLG in H265 with 10bit 4:2:0 to be extremely decent and definitely better than my G9 8bit 4k60 footage (when uploading directly to youtube) for it to be my possible next camera system.
@@charbax I don't understand your post. Being the professional you seem to be why have you not switched to Sony yrs ago. Or Olly/Fuji if you wanted to stick with M 4/3 lens
HUGH, ❤️ all your videos man! ...by the way, thank you very much for taking the time previously to write me back a couple of times, (I imagine) I truly appreciate that! Again very nicely balanced video and thought shared. Man, I could listen to you all day long! ...ever considered round table (in person) discussion with other camera UA-cam folks? NOW that would be intriguing and fun!! You guys could make it an annual thing and I think people would view, heck yeah they would.
The GH6! Do you know how fast were you travelling when testing for rolling shutter?
I have watched including your video now about 20 videos on the GH6. One interesting point I can now say (I should make video about this or someone should) people that have used the GH camera for video, embraced it and generally speak highly and honestly about the system with the exception of one UA-camr (naming no names here) I have observed their comments appear balance and fair. For those that are not coming from Panasonic GH5 I am not certain all their methods and approach arriving at their final decision is as accurate as they think or came up with. ...did that even make sense what I said?
I own A7C, and A1 they are both wonderful especially the A1 with GM & G glass. At the same time I have a GH5. Did not jump into the GH5(II), that what's the point, since GH6 is coming and will be better (it is!) then I would be left GH5(II) to do what with? I suppose if I was getting into the GH series from start then the GH(II) could have been a good place to start.
So now I have gone full frame.
Can I even look back to 4/3 system? I ❤️ the GH5, ❤️ the GH5 glass I have, ❤️ the GH menu, Man I just ❤️ the camera even with it AF what it is and low light performance. I accept it where it is at. Could it ever meet or catch full frame now. R&D is going to full frame, we get it you said that 🟢HUGH Agreed! 4/3 system can catch APS-C .
The big, massive question in my mind is this, 🔴"DOES IT TRULY MATTER?"🔴 Is the picture good enough or just right or totally super coming out of the GH6? It appears from all that I have seen, the GH6 picture is indeed that good.
After all this, "just what the heck do I think based on your awesome video HUGH and all that i know?"
The GH6 is still a very relevant very awesome camera. ...for film making it just might be the return of the king.
I am still impartial and sure bias when it comes to GH series so my OPINION is not best not even close but darn I still love the GH system and with arrival of the GH6 I truly want it but right now i sit on the fence kind of. (leaning toward selling my GH5, holding my GH glass then perhaps (probably) getting a new king in my hands. 😁.
OM-1 / Can you explain why do they get the AF right and they are too 4/3 system and do video?
HUGH, thanks again for super video can not wait to see more on the topic and other.
Hey, Garfield. So glad you enjoy our videos! We were traveling between 30 and 40 mph (Claudia was driving, so I’m not sure), about the same speed when we tested a couple of Sony cameras including the RX10 along the same stretch of road a few years ago.😊🖖🏻
I can tell you I sold my A7IV for a GH5 knowing that the GH6 would come out sometime and I was right. So I can say that the A7IV seems really basic and not as "pro" as the GH6. The only thing "pro" about the A7IV is the price, that camera should be $1999 or same price as GH6 and see what happens.
Ok,so before I offer some facts ,I will say this is a camera i will take a great look at, hold it, mess with it, etc,etc.It seems they might have solved the issue of the crappy AF, and this one, unlike that EM1x farce, is not horribly overpriced. Now to the facts..I shot 4/3 the first time I went digital, and it was great, yet i remain puzzled why 4/3 shooters feel the need to always compare with FF and APS-C, because frankly, ff, medium format, and APS-C is not worried about 4/3. It's a defensive posture which goes nowhere, because the sales numbers/CIPA numbers speak for themselves, as far as what people shoot professionally with.
Of course we can say, I can say something is just as good because I like it and use it, which makes sense in those people's minds, yet the hard fact is, this is a BUSINESS, not a popularity contest. These companies that are in the top 4 are there for a reason, because that's what the world needs. People buy Jordans because the y like them, not because they are the best bang for the buck or built better. If I had the funds, I might have a GH6, Z9, A1, cinema cameras, and a host of gear, yet like most people, I have what i NEED.I just bought 2 small cameras, not because I cry and whine about weight, size, and expense, yet i NEEDED something I can shove in my pocket, use in skating rinks, has IBIS, has great AF, and has unlimited recording time to live stream.
Now that I have that i can get something bigger with similar specs and fills the boxes for me. If GH6 cameras and those like it were the same standards, then the professional shooters would be clamoring to them and they would have the same demand the Nikon d850 and Canon M50 did. I believe that each format has it's merits and they should be praised and compared to similar products, for logic's sake alone, instead of anecdotal instances and stories, as if we cannot shoot 4/3, medium format, film, and full frame, by the same person.
I have the A7iv, and it doesn't have Product Showcase. I just looked on the Sony site for a firmware update, but there's nothing new. So, why does your video show "Product showcase" when displaying your A7iv footage?
As a use case.
How does the Lumix GH6 compare the the Lumix S5II or S5II X?
Excellent in its own right, but I much prefer the S5 II twins for what we do.
@@3BMEP Thank you so much for getting back to me...I really appreciate it. IF you don't mind...can I ask you one more question? I'm going to retire at the end of this year and want to get into producing 3-5 minute short videos by using a combination of Video clips, interviews, Still shots and even some drone footage as I just passed the FAA Part 107 Test. The Videos will be of things that interest me around town and surrounding communities and non profits and fun interesting stories to tell. So I'm thinking a Highbred Camera and I keep upping the game the more I learn. I started out looking at the G9 then the GH6...Now the S5II and the S5II X In your last response you indicated the S5II would be your choice. Based on what I told you I want to do would that recommendation still hold true?
Thank you so much for your input and the content you put out. I'm a BIG FAN!!!!
Jim G.
@@jimgunderson6439 yep. 😊👍🏻
please just release a still only camera Panasonic for us still photographers
Hugh - Unlimited record times are for all modes or just the C4K? Thanks! 🙂
Currently listed as all modes, but I can’t imagine there won’t eventually be a specified limit for at LEAST 4K/120p
@@3BMEP Awesome thank you!
Curious, are any of the lenses you're comparing to the Nocticron stabilised? Not even asking about dual IS of course, lol
Excellent question, and the answer is ‘no.’ The longer answer: doesn’t matter. The full answer: it doesn’t matter because the IBIS systems in the bodies for which the Sigma 85 and 90 (and Tamron 28-75) were designed are sufficiently performant. Lens IS matters most at longer focal lengths.
@@3BMEP Thank you. Well, some of us bought into Lumix or Olympus precisely to get the best stabilisation possible and OIS gives clear benefits even at focal lengths like 50mm (FF equiv) in cameras with better IBIS than any FF camera. Hence I suppose the key word is "sufficiently", with a footnote saying "for my needs".
Not that I'm saying lens stabilisation makes up for the price, but it is definitely something to consider.
@@AoyagiAichou agreed. For us, lens IS is much more important on the Leica DG Vario Elmarit 50-200 - brilliant little lens!