Ellie Taylor's Surprising Sales Technique | Would I Lie To You?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 25 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 13

  • @BlandBloke
    @BlandBloke Рік тому +65

    David Mitchell even explaining the intention behind the lie is such a boss move😂

  • @Clearlight201
    @Clearlight201 Рік тому +37

    David having his Hercule Poirot moment there at the end

  • @joyjoy5689
    @joyjoy5689 Рік тому +18

    If you keep quiet you can still hear the scream now 😂😂😂

  • @MikeMJPMUNCH
    @MikeMJPMUNCH Рік тому +28

    That Noel Edmunds first breath joke is brilliant

  • @decodolly1535
    @decodolly1535 Рік тому +5

    Whether I was looking to rent or buy, telling me Noel Edmonds had any vague association with a place would be an instant guarantee that I wouldn't take it!

  • @colemantrebor6574
    @colemantrebor6574 Рік тому +6

    That laugh in the audience at 1:21! What is that???

  • @bustercrimes7379
    @bustercrimes7379 Рік тому +2

    Deal or no deal would have been a good line

  • @TheDarkVampire666
    @TheDarkVampire666 Рік тому +8

    I think if someone actually did that it would be believable as he’s famous enough that most (Brits) know who is is but not so famous that it’s just a obvious lie

  • @TJCals
    @TJCals Рік тому +2

    Okay. Looked up Noel Edmonds. Now I know why this is a lie.

  • @bailzzzzzz
    @bailzzzzzz 11 місяців тому +1

    I thought this was quite believable on the card, and they pulled her up on some pretty trivial stuff. Of course a letting agent agreeing a let would still consider it a 'sale' - eg a sale on the board. And since it's a throwaway office joke to begin with, she might well mix up if he was born / or had just lived there as the joke escalated - it doesn't need to be the same each time. Also, I disagree with David completely - why would you buy a house - a major purchase, just because noel edmonds lived there? You might well choose to rent it though, since it matters much less, if you're on the fence it's as good as any reason. I actually thought it was a double bluff, given how poorly she defended those easily refuted points