It Happened! The Stunning Image of SN 1987A That Webb Captured
Вставка
- Опубліковано 31 сер 2023
- In this episode, we explore the stunning new image of SN 1987A, one of the most studied supernovae in history, taken by NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope. We see how Webb’s infrared vision reveals new features within the supernova remnant, such as small crescent-like structures that may be part of the outer layers of gas ejected by the explosion. We also compare Webb’s image with previous images taken by other telescopes, and discuss how Webb’s image can help us understand how supernovae shape their surroundings and influence the evolution of galaxies.
Best Telescopes for beginners:
Celestron 70mm Travel Scope
amzn.to/3jBi3yY
Celestron 114LCM Computerized Newtonian Telescope
amzn.to/3VzNUgU
Celestron - StarSense Explorer LT 80AZ
amzn.to/3jBRmds
Visit our website for up-to-the-minute updates:
www.nasaspacenews.com
Follow us
Facebook: / nasaspacenews
Twitter: / spacenewsnasa
Join this channel to get access to these perks:
/ @nasaspacenewsagency
#NSN #webb #sn1987a #supernova #infrared #image #nircam #hubble #spitzer #alma #chandra #comparison #features #crescents #ring #ejecta #shockwave #dust #elements #evolution #galaxies #discovery #wonder #astronomy #cosmos #science #NASA #Astronomy - Наука та технологія
![Everything NASA Discovered from James Webb's First Year in Space [4K]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/nbDQEo0uA0Q/mqdefault.jpg)
The explosion was first observed in 1987.
The real explosion happened "hundred of thousands of year ago" but the light/image of the explosion has just reached us due to the vast distance in space.
Hi Ben, I was a kid in 1987, never saw it, and I've seen the Andromeda Galaxy. Not saying it didn't happen but wasn't noticeable. Probably like 0.5 lumens brighter for 1 second.
@@TSnowy23 This supernova was only visible in the Southern hemisphere, because it was in the Large Magellanic Cloud.
Amazing Universe we're living in and Webb reveals more and more ❤
Incredible... from a gigantic and not so terrible chaotic explosion to a star forming region, nature is a miracle!
The transformative aspect can be described as a basic force in our universe...
Oh, please just say nineteen eighty seven. Webb is amazing. Thank you for sharing these wonderful images and excellent information.
I just wish I were young enough to actually go out there and explore myself. But, as that will never be possible, watching videos like these are the closest I can ever get, thank you.
Thank you so much for sharing this fascinating podcast, I shared this with my son as well. There are so many things we don’t know about our world let alone about our universe! I’m greedy and have hit the all notifications button🤭🥰
Great 👍
The artistic genius that we are; reflects in these images.
Great video, thank you! And, Congratulations to our friends, in the country of India! Your team has delivered what was without question, a perfectly executed engineering feat. A moment of national pride, but also for mankind as a whole.
Impressive video and thank you for a proper title, no clickbait...
amazing! Thank you so much for the descriptions and explanations that a non-scientist, like me, can (mostly) follow! This is so so so cool!
Is SN1987a a neutron star now? There should be something remaining after the super nova right? A neutron star or black hole.
👋👌💯🎆🎇🙂. NICE ONE !! ENJOYED Indeed ! FROM, U.K. (2023).
Nice! I was conceived when this was discovered in February (2-23-1987), and was born on November 18, 1987. The largest current known star is Stephenson 2-18. I am the son of Stephen. Pretty cool "gifts".
Amazing. Given the importance in the discovery of new details in this supernova, could we now give it a more proper name? How about the “Shockeye” supernova?
I love the photos from james Web everytime i see them i have to look and info from the vidoes made is spectacular
New elements?! That WOULD be exciting! (Of course I'm just teasing...)
Seems to me that it could've been higher resolution being Webb. It's awfully blurry still and out of focus or something.. but it is not the "high definition" we see in other deep field photos of Supernovae and distant galaxies. Maybe it's me, maybe I'm missing something here that everyone else has knowledge about, but to me this photo leaves a lot to be desired.
Exactly my thoughts and feelings about this Webb image. I was expecting more details and crystal clear image. But maybe longer exposure is needed..
Great work. I understand that it's needed to form images observing different parts of the spectrum. In Webb's case 4 Infrared filtered spectrums. Also, other telescopes are looking in short Radio waves spectrum, and another in X-Ray Spectrum. My question is if we have actual images at the same time in all these electromagnetic waves frequencies? If Webb's images is from last year, is it monitored in X-Ray and Radio (Short, Long) and at very low frequency? I know that the very low frequency can give information about the previous stages before the collapse. Thanks.
i wonder how it will look like when it expands
An excellent video. Please explain, James Webb obviously looks at this event, differently. Do any of the other systems, like Hubble or ALMA show scientists anything that James Webb cannot show? Second, Einstein said he believed the universe was 95% dark matter that he could not identify. Does James Webb show some of Einstein's 95% dark matter, with this example? Or is Einsteins dark matter something else?
Surf's up still🏄
In, "The Magic of Space," the enlightened entity explains, "The beings that make up the sun concentrate on a point in space. Matter starts to accumulate there. The matter starts to spin. More and more matter accumulates at that point. It starts to heat up. Lightning discharges start to happen. More matter accumulates. At just the right moment, a destructive comet hits into the center of all this and a planet is formed."
Say "S N ONE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED EIGHTY SEVEN A" ONE more time. Oh my god.
Hahahahaha
I pointed 1987a out to friends 2 days before official announcement. We were 19 and they didn't believe me.
Where were you? 1987a has a declination of - (minus) 69 degrees.
Not in north America or Europe or anywheres
The JWST images of that 1987a supernova are extremely good, much more detailed.
Still blurry and out of focus.
Theosophy states, "The sun is older than the planets, but the planets are older than the sun." it's a seemingly contradictory statement. The sun sheds its outer layers, then reignites. The material that came out will form the planets, making the planets older than the "new" reignited sun. But the sun created the material, making it older than the planets.
Could your mind be blown anymore ? Probably !
If you really want to know what SN 1987A is see (Stars in an Electric Universe) By the late Wallace (Wal) Thornhill!
Journey to past ......................oo
Pretty good.
Get rid of the fake dust specks - it adds nothing to your presentation.
Also try to be more consistent with identifying real images versus cgi illustrations.
Supernovae naming is the year of discovery, then a letter is assigned in order of appearance. Presenter even mentions year, spoken normally, but then apparently never makes the connection. You can't fix stupid.
There is a preacher here on YT that’s goes very deep in the bible using astrology + other info to say that the bible was speaking of THIS very supernova when it was speaking of Jesus …kinda, anyway u be the judge. His name is William Donahue. Let me know if u check him out. Cheers heaps, NASA, for the info and content u got me watchin’ and learning. -✌️🇦🇺
As interesting it is and as beautiful the images may be, the generated speech is annoyingly monotonous when always repeating "SN 1987 A" in exactly the same voice.
How MANY times did you repeat SN1987a in this video???? you CAN protest and ask for synonyms.......to the writer.
The technology to capture the image of a explosion is old. Hubble captured the image of gamma ray burst. Now the JW should be able to capture latest immediate explosions. But these are captured long after the explosion. NASA can do better.
The robot voice was too annoying for me to keep watching for more than a few minutes.
"S N ONE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED EIGHTY SEVEN A" said one thousand nine hundred eighty seven times. Ugh!
Messy
Distracting robot AI narration. Also looks blown out/blurry for "100 times better" than Hubble, at 170k light years away.
Ai voices are flat,featureless and yes robotic please stop it!
Still no real clear images.all this money burned for a pic as clear a pic from a blackberry 🙄
Who else quit watching because of " s n one thousand nine hundred eighty seven a" 😑
Could you PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE stop using that ridiculous celluloid scratch effect? It doesn't make your great videos any better. It is just annoying. Thank you.