My biggest problem with Google is that 40% of the search results are sponsored or adds. They are getting greedier with time and it's reached a point where their products really suffer from all the advertisement. I'm going to give Bing a chance and try to addapt to it.
It would happen the same thing if microsoft want to monetize that. Please learn from history... provocation instead of learning... everybody will change if about money...
I've organically started using Bing more and more over the last couple of years. It has better results for image searches most of the times. Sometimes when I google a query I get the same irrelevant results even after rewording them, adding and removing operators - it's really sliding into shit. And, not that I do this, it has superior porn video search😇
@@andreaspriantono6791 At least with competition, these two companies have to fight for our views and cater a bit more to our wishes. If you are a monopoly you can make your product as egregious as you want.
This feels like a Kodak Moment. Kodak was one of the first to bring out a digital camera, they shelved it because it clashed with their film manufacturing business. Google locked their AI up in the basement because it clashed with their search engine business.
I'm absolutely down for it. I don't know why don't companies understand that some people just love nostalgia. I remember as a kid I used to use it on my dad's computer.
To be honest, it's nice to see Google have competition again. Sometimes the giant gets too comfortable and needs to be reawaken. Microsoft to Google: Bing-o!
i will be very happy to see google fall. since they took away something very important to me. my old photos without even telling me. i just couldn't access my Picasa account back then. its my peasure to see them in this situation
I totally agree with the fact that google search results is really garbage these days. All they have been doing is add more sponsored results and ad space to the results page.
Google search results have become alot worse for the last 6 months or so. And I mean by an order of magnitude worse. I'm a developer, and I used to be able to find answers quickly for basically any dev-related question using Google. Always relevant stuff (and I don't see any sponsored stuff or ads because I use Ublock Origin). But the last few months have been absolutely terrible. I can't get answers even to basic and beginner stuff now. It's very odd.
@@Rhidayah - On the flip side, MS can't keep giving free milk. Eventually, they need to monetize that "free" search. We users are already the product, but that AI is going to have one hell of a bill that we need to pay for using it. How will that bill be paid? Will it be subscription services?
@@bruzote It'll be eating -Google's- Chrome's lunch. Then, eating Google's ad revenue. I've been using Edge and Bing Chat a lot more over the last couple of months because of GPT-4's integration into the browser.
@@bruzote Considering Google sells all our search and browsing information, and every site we go to hits us with Cookies that capture all our personal Data which they use for marketing and selling... WE shouldn't have to pay for a "general" limited search engine like we have now... but may have to pay a fee for Chat-GPT... which might be more expensive considering a limited intelligent user base and how poorly current educational practices are... and the more intelligent a user is, there will be a higher form of censorship to keep then from searching for sensitive information.
My mouth dropped to the floor with those Bing demonstrations. They've already pushed the technology so far. Google is gonna struggle to catch up in my opinion.
I think the brand awareness of Google may help them though. I never use Bing because everything else just defaults to Google, it will take some serious rewiring of habits for me to start using Bing instead. I remember when Bing first launched and everyone just laughed at the name moved on. Bizarrely even now I can't take it seriously and think of Chandler when I hear it.
Probably running AdBlock lol. I haven't seen ads in years due to AdBlock and running private DNS to block ads for both desktop and smartphone. (search private DNS for ad block)
I'm interested to see how this would affect the education system. There's even lesser incentive to think critically and slog through articles and books if you have a tool as useful as what ChatGPT is saying it's gonna be.
It could turn out to be a disaster. It might take away lots of revenue from authors/writers. They might be inclined to research and publish stuff when an AI bot can scrap all data and pass it to users. It will also be bad for our justice system which is already bad enough. Innocent people will get blamed for things they didn't do, and criminals will easily get away by refuting evidence and condemning AI for all the bad things they did. It will get harder and harder to prove the evidence. And it's already happening, AI is getting blamed for all political audio leaks.
I've been considering the structure of education and role technology should play in evolving our institutions as well. I think it could be an efficient process, if we transitioned into like a reference/pointer based system for information with focus on treading through false information, and allow us to focus more on creative and critical ideas.
To be fair, the time saved by not slogging through the texts could be utilized in crafting up new and innovative ways of solving the problem, or in just plain creativity. It's gonna be a boon for those who are interested in actual *education* .
@@Raj-gr6dy Yeah that's true, I just think with amazing AI tools like chatgpt becoming normal nowadays there's really nothing pushing us to try and learn or think anymore because thinking creative and original thoughts is hard and who would want that if everything's so comfortable and easy and there's so many ways to distract ourselves rather than be introspective and deep thinkers. I'm just imagining those people from Wall-E in their hoverchairs stuffing their faces and watching mindlessly on their screen. We're really not that far off from that. Plus, the changes happening in tech is rapid that I think it's inevitable that some people will be left behind and the ones that do manage to keep up will be exhausted and anxious all the time. I think yours is the more optimistic way of looking at this which I really hope is how we'll become but who knows.
I have a different philosophy entirely, Ive been using chat gpt feverishly learning python or often to replace google and one thing Ive learned is that its not a replacement for understanding a subject because its usefulness scales with its user's knowledge of the subject. You have to know how to ask the right questions with the right context to get better results. And you have to know when to check the ai which requires just knowing the subject. The rapid fire nature of the ais answers, mixed with the high likeiehood of getting a repeat answer from similar questions, means its quicker and requires less resistance to formulate new ideas yourself and use chat gpt to explore those trees of thought than it is to try to get the chat to cheat something together for you. It will most definitely require huge overhauls across the board and especially in education, but I think those changes are long overdue. It was a gpt chat thread that first suggested python coding, and from there I started going hard, mentor in pocket.
... yeah including that hilarious but sad one about how AI is going to make life better. We've never heard that before in connection with technology forcing the treadmill faster, micromanagement of every moment of Life tighter, Etc. Ah yes the religion of Technology.
@@nonnobissolum such cynicism to the point of morbidity can only come from a life filled with failure and regret. Are you as depressing as you sound or is it just something you do on UA-cam?
@@endoflevelboss Bro, it's just a youtube comment, a normal one at that. Are you by chance the best psychologist in the world if you can tell that he's living a miserable life based solely on that comment?
@@endoflevelboss lol. Project much? Also, perhaps you've never heard the quote about the power of accurate observation frequently being mistaken for cynicism by people who do not possess the power of accurate observation.
@@nonnobissolum AI will definetly make life better!Technology has improved life so much in the last 40 years,i grew up through the eighties and it was pretty basic and boring compared to now!
I think Microsoft had it all planned since couple of years. They just wanted to take their Competitor by surprise and not give them any time to prepare, giving Microsoft a big lead.
I highly doubt there was anything to be surprised about since the news of MS funding profit oriented part of OpenAI years ago pal. There was this leek about Google Lamda AI being sentient few months ago so something does not add up. MS developed their AI heavily and Google is silent about theirs - i believe it is a good thing, they cant Rush Such sensitive matter forward too Quick or it will kill us all :D Jokes aside, I see Google winning that battle.
You can see Microsoft is well prepared and they studied it really well. They push this technology while at the same time introducing new UI to edge, and bing getting somewhat better than google already without ai. And I can tell it’s such a pleasure to see a fight like this and Microsoft actually taking steps forward to improve user experience since the last few months.
@@jameshughes6078 Microsoft is really keen to take over again or at least compete competitively. Edge's Phoenix rumors are looking to really set it apart, bing is finally viable, they're finally supporting Xbox. What they really need is a leg in the mobile space and to keep pushing. The former I think they're already set to do while disrupting the market. They just need to release a mobile phone running full windows and using the android subsystem to have access to windows and Android apps (and they need to build their own official android app store or partner with google play store on that). Then get with Samsung and some other Android phone makers to push it as an alternative to Android and IOS. Modern mobile hardware should be more than capable of just running windows (if not at least windows on Arm). And if they continue to improve touch and the UI/UX in tablet mode and make a simplified version you can switch to on mobile it should do well enough. I'm excited. Microsoft had to really innovate to come back after getting conceited.
I'm also excited in this way, but... does it have to be Microsoft? I'd be glad to see a tech war (I mean it in the good competition sense) finally shifting away from the good old Silicon Valley and that players from other places would also grab their big chunks from it. Like companies from China and Japan for instance.
Microsoft was very excited a couple years ago when one person in Kansas actually tried to use the Bing browser. But they did one search and immediately went back to Chrome.
Haven’t used bing in absolute ages and always thought Microsoft search was terrible but damn that bing demo was mind blowing, the pdf reporter is incredible
Bing is good in English and in USA. I can attest (because I'm bilingual) that Bing is no where near the precision of Google in Spanish nor in Latinoamerica. There's no real competition in foreign market because Google works per country, Bing per region (the results are not as precise)
@@Jose04537 Not really. I'm in Australia and Bing's answers even in English are nowhere as accurate as Google's. And I'm speaking as someone who is quite invested in their ecosystem, owning an Xbox, farm Microsoft Rewards, subscribed to Game Pass, Office 365, Windows etc.
@@GyariSan1 He literally said that language is something bing is not very good at. It's 100% true if you've ever searched for things in different languages on different search engines. Google is really great for every language while bing is just not.
I understand how and why it can happen, but losing 100 billion dollars from a bad presentation just strengthens the idea that money is a funny little thing we made up.
This wasn't a presentation for your college / university project, this was a business presentation about the direction of the company and what it's future would be like compared to their rivals. If anything, this proves accountability and that you can't just go by your name, but must have a product to match the reputation. In this case, it actually proves that money and the monetary system (even though it's broken in a lot of other instances) is still based on something real and tangible rather than just reputation and hype. I am sure after this incident and the blowback, the engineers and executives will be forced to grow up and act more professionally and with more seriousness. They won't treat making a business presentation like making a tiktok video.
I hate visiting news sites and being attacked by pop ups asking for money, and with AI it looks like I may never have to look at one again. I wonder if news sites will start charging digital tolls to AI sourcing their information or something?
@@CristianGarcia Not really. The AI has 2 parts, the past, and the future. In terms of what has been recorded from now and all the way to the past, it has all been read by the AI. Therefore, questions regarding anything that doesn't involve up-to-date information will be answered effortlessly. Then comes the future part., and I agree this will have problems. However, I believe that the past and what has been recorded already will cover the bigger part of the questions asked. Therefore, I still think it will scale big time.
Not really tbh. They have more on AI than Microsoft and without Google chatGPT won’t exist so they are really only late to the implementation and that’s not really a problem because you are not gonna switch to bing or edge
Google search has turned into a paid advertising feed. It's what happens when you have a monopoly and purposefully crappify your product to extract more money from your captive audience. Sooner or later a competitor enters the market and trounces you.
Google is leading ai research. Google started it with transformers and Google also has state of the art language models like PaLM. They are also making new discoveries about scaling laws. They have better tech in AI than pretty much everyone. They have state of the art in image generation and also language models. (and good new research)
"Google is an unbelievable company, they're the 800 pound gorilla, and I hope that with our innovation they will definitely want to come out and show that they can dance and I want the world to know that we made them dance" that's the best form of "dance b*tch" (Dave Chappelle voice) I've ever seen on the internet
Esspecially when you are following. They bascially need to jump 3 years in 1 year to get ahead of everyone. I have my doubts it's possible for such a big company
That's an example for bad research. Google has been on this topic for years. Just see their keynotes from 2 years ago. Google made tools open source, that open ai utilizes. What we're seeing here is just about UX it's not about how good the ai is in these examples. So the outcome of this race is far from being as obvious as you proclaim here.
@MiroslawHorbal thats the most troubling part to me. They've said they have been working on AI for years now. But it seems they are just now putting focus on AI now. Hopefully, it was just a bad day, and their AI is much more developed
You could have told google was struggling by their very aggressive shift in focus to AI - they realised they needed to get off their chairs and get to work urgently. Would not be surprised at all if they still massively overtake bing and chatgpt after a couple of years but for now it's incredibly difficult for us to imagine a greater leap than the one to chatgpt.
Google made Alpha Zero. This is a significantly bigger leap in AI than what ChatGPT actually represents. Chat GPT is just a more useful application, but not a bigger leap in AI technology.
@@ericarezzo6675 that's true, they were really on top of things with their deep mind projects. I've not heard anything from them about that since alphazero was released in 2017
@@insertwittymonikerhere oh stop it edge isn't internet explorer it's pretty good i personally don't use it but it's pretty solid and often faster than chrome Bing is also matured a lot it's great for video and image searches
@@borisvidolov - That pompous strutting around and then smashing the car's windows would have been a dead sentence for any other product presentation. But the vehicle was so wild, and Elon has (eh, had) such a big fanbase, that it was forgiven almost immediately.
I feel like search engines are already manipulative. AI search engines will be even more manipulative to people being funneled into specific results funded by particular corporations. Sounds like a great way for big corps to get bigger.
yep. for the first time basically since i’ve been alive I have used Bing. the truth is I have no personal connection to google, if a competitor is better at search I will switch.
honestly at this point i barely use Google to directly search for stuff, the engine has become so fkn dumb and i have to spend more time looking for a solution than actually implementing it.
it isn't complacency at all. It's directed and intentional restructuring of their platform to better support/promote their political agenda I wouldn't even consider they are motivated by corporate interest, if they are, they'll produce worthwhile products that actually bring revenues and profits.
When they're more interested in inclusion and diversity instead of staying in their lane and producing a product people NEED. All AI is atm is a toy until it's ULTIMATE use which is cheating and propaganda.
@@gelmir7322 This They destroyed their own platforms with woke shit. Google never recovered since 2012 quality-wise, and then after 2016, apparently there's no turning back
Isn't this what happened to Nokia? Even though they had the touch screen technology years before anyone else they never pushed it and later it was to late and lost
Im really glad google are being given a run for their money. They have become too massive for their own good, and need some stiff competition to keep them striving for better.
Yes, I like Google, but the super-incredible-this is amazing lead they had a decade or more ago with regards to search performance is long gone. I'd definitely switch if Bing has a good "relaunch" with AI.
The Bing AI is nuts. Its pretty much how non-tech savvy people expected search to work in the first place lol. It might be nice to run queries without having to use the specific language search engines like in order to match you with what youre actually looking for tbh
Since this is how normies were imagining search in the first place, can we make the normal search the way it was before ? Can somebody just give me google like it was 2007-2014? Thanks
12:11 "Also the livestream's comments were turned off". This is the fundamental problem with tech in recent years really. They don't want to hear your opinion unless it's fanfare. This sort of disconnect just leads to an enormous bias chasm and eventual collapse when they learn that the general public's opinion does, in fact, matter.
Microsoft has been doing great in recent years, I never thought I would think they were a good company only a few years ago but it feels like everything they touch turns to gold lately.
I'd like to say a word of prayer for the Google engineers that you know have been overworked and stressed to create a competitor to present in such a limited timeline.
I +1'd you.. but keep in mind they are some of the highest paid employees on the planet, and there's plenty of evidence to suggest they haven't been working /super/ hard in recent times. So I'm glad OpenAI/Microsoft/Bing came around to light a fire under their butts. I'm sure Google will find a way to come out doing just fine.
@@TheNpcNoob Google researchers wrote the original paper outlining Transformer A.I. Architecture in 2017, they were far ahead in the research. Their research scientists did what all scientists do, they published it and basically open sourced the idea. OpenAI comes along and picks it up and runs with it, with MS’s deep pockets to make it happen. Google stumbled in believing that A.I. had little application to their core search business when it looks like they could lose a good chunk of it because they ‘lacked vision’.
I feel bad for the Google presenter too. Impressive how Microsoft had the stamina to continue competing with Google until this moment finally arrived. It's the first time I see Google shamble.
The Microsoft presentation was really effective. I'm apprehensive about AI because of data privacy concerns and potential biases, but since I already use Bing I could totally see myself using the AI features. I even went to check and see if it was available yet (there's a waiting list). Realistically I know there's not a ton of difference between corporations when it comes to ethics, but I think Microsoft benefits the most from just being an alternative to Google.
@@chosenone6158 still, their 10 year deal is stable enough for them to continue building on their lead and eventually leap frog google to become the industry leaders in software again. It also helps that Azure (which will also get OpenAI tool integration) is already ahead well of Google Cloud.
Recently in the past couple months I've really noticed how I am unable to find the information that I want with Google, I have to scroll endlessly pass useless things that have nothing to do what I search for and sometimes they even start repeating results that I already passed up. I never thought that I would consider changing from Google Chrome but now it seems like I don't have a choice if I want access to the information I want.
It's weird that a company like Google, who has been dumping billions into AI research for more than a decade is getting beat by Microsoft's lucky OpenAI acquisition
Or is it? To me personally that is the elephant question. What is Google doing with their AI project? I confess I'm starting to suspect bad things, but I'm not going that road just yet. Snap out of it, Vinícius! If not that, then I'm at least worried what a desperate colossus like Google is capable of doing if eventually cornered and existentially threatened. I'm well aware we're living in an actual info world war and the US empire is collapsing in different ways and they're jealous that communist China has been progressing consistently for decades and taking the lead and they're afraid it might inspire anticapitalist surges in other places to "replace" US-lead liberal democracy values with China-lead "common prosperity" projects. The war in Ukraine is ultimately about it (it marks the end of US hegemony). Now... if Google continues to take hard his from the competition, will it secretly sell itself for western geopolitical propaganda and control what we see in the internet? Or does it actually take a desperate colossus selling itself off at all? Or is it quietly already happening and we've been controlled for years? My fear is, if nothing of that is happening, then it will.
Great comment. Very intelligent.. almost toooooo intelligent.. WHO PROGRAMMED YOU?! WHICH ONE DO YOU WORK FOR?!?! DO YOU HAVE EMOTIONS?!?!?! Either way can you tell how to make 5 million bucks and write my Bumble bio for me plz..? Thaannkkssss
@Cary Galloway Search changed, but in such way that now it is useless. And it is useless partially because of AI. AI generated websites without real information or "platforms" on first pages of search query. I even stooped to "asking google"(or duckduckgo or others). It was different 10 years ago.
@@inevespace plus sponsored content often occupying over half of the top searches ruins all credibility. Especially considering Google does a terrible job checking the content of their Google adds. The top Google search result for the open source 3d software Blender was a google add leading to a scam website packed with malicious software for weeks before they took it down.
Google Search used to be amazing. The answers I wanted in milliseconds. Now I have to scroll down past a bunch of ad related results. It's almost to the point where I need to go to the mythical Page 2.
I thought so too, and they really didn't sound cheesy like Apple has for so many years. It was really direct and to the point. Here's an example of an Ikea chair going in a couch. We've not seen innovation like this in ages.
@@chadradwell2593 i think they focus more on formal/economic reports( those have summary on their own or key points that bing can scoup up and present). Not summarizing a whole novel into few paragraghs.
@@greggianbayocboc How do you suppose someone "liberated" by this technology and "living life" with their new found freedom - buy food? Rent? Energy costs?
I think they spend all their time and money on developing AlphaGo, an AI that can perform the extremely important task of...... playing a boardgame called Go.
google's reverse image search somehow became terrible when they implemented google lens in it, at first i thought they couldn't lose this battle with Microsoft but now since it seems like the pressure is getting to them things could really fall apart
I think this time we will see two giant tech clashing each other to make a great AI search engine, and user will be divided until only one standing and then the search engine become so popular until the search engine having slow performance because user searching for something Gibberish, for me my personal, Open AI is great for specific important things you need, while google is more like public entertainments search kinda like GPS and Maps, one is to the point other is for looking more option
11:43 "It was the most embarassing incident in a tech presentation since Steve Jobs' wifi wouldn't connect back in 2010" A good contender that's more recent IMO is the Tesla Cybertruck demonstration of the "bulletproof" windows lol
📎"It looks like you're trying to write a doctoral thesis on the relationship between leadership and employee engagement in the legal services industry!"
ColdFusion....one of the wisest creators on UA-cam. Thank you for sharing your brilliance with us. I learn more from your channel than I did in college.
In 1989, Apple released a video of what they thought a future AI assistant might be like. The AI talks with the user and appears as an avatar on a small screen. The AI operates like an old school secretary, screening calls and in one case, mights a call. The user asks the AI to produce a presentation and moments later, it’s done.
Possibly devastation. Less and less steps to secure the use of AI and ill intented people will eventually use it for self gain, weapons and manipulation
@TheLoneJourney If you think this is not historical then why are you here Your comment is completely full of fear of not being able to control the situation once some big ambitious fantasy turns into reality. You are a person who has no control over his life
I can see why Satya is so happy! They’re way ahead. He speaks really well too. I guess they’re gonna have to pay all the blogs, websites, and UA-cam videos they’re using information from. Some kind creator fund from the search profits.
If I'm not wrong, in the AI answers to queries most statements had links to sources. So that's not different from what search engines and personal assistants already do.
One major thing that plagues Google's search currently is sponsors/ads, even the results AFTER the "Sponsored" results. This is especially noticeable on mobile. A great example of this is I was trying to get tickets to a specific concert at The Rave/Eagle Club in Milwaukee on Etix, their official ticket broker. All of the results I got (even several screens down) were just ticket brokers gouging the tickets prices. The show WASN'T sold out. Etix never came up even though I included it in the search bar!
Google presentation reminds me, of my undergraduate presentations where we have no clue what we gonna talk and the deadline was the next 24 hours. Just a bunch of random facts and opinions. Even we know we were shit and all we wanted is to just pass.
I don't know if I'm the only one that has thought this but Dagogo actually sounds like a really brilliant AI voice assistant with amazing synthesis 😂😂😂
I will switch to edge and bing yesterday if it's as good as they said in their presentation. I hate ads so much I use adblocker and pay for any streaming service no matter how infrequently I use it. I am so tired of getting full pages of ads if I don't add "reddit" to the end of a query that I am done with anything google.
But it deserves respect for Maps, Search and UA-cam. I remember the times when had to remember website names and spellings & navigate using physical maps or by asking people for addresses.
Robotics is advancing rapidly too. And medical science. Even though we were already living in a “sci-fi “ world 10 years ago compared to 50 years ago, it’s truly starting to “feel” sci-fi lol
Very apocalyptic. Companies like Microsoft and Google should not own proprietary technologies like this. It is poorly researched. Everything is going to hell. If the people can not own and moderate these technologies on their own accord, they should not exist.
Microsoft is arguably worse than Google. They are more woke and more anticompetitive. Microsoft tried to kill Linux, plus all the Internet Explorer nonsense. Like Google, Microsoft filters results that they don't agree with. AI will be the next killer app for propaganda. Much like what happened to social media & Wikipedia, they will get people hooked on its useful utilities, then train it to comply with the narrative. They're already doing the latter, just a matter of getting the masses to trust it.
I'd love to see Microsoft integrate this into Cortana and release a smart speaker. After using ChatGPT for a good while, I'm ready to slam my head against the wall everytime I talk to my Google Home. It feels like a decade or 2 difference.
There’s also the possibility of using analog computing chips to better decode voice signals for ai. If Microsoft can integrate this tech along with chatgpt into a new smart speaker they could have a revolutionary product.
You know, when I first saw chat GPT, my first Primal instinct is to keep it to myself until I start making money. Then I said to myself, that's silly, because it's not a secret. It's out here. But I started showing it to people and no one had seen it and knew what it was. But after I showed them, you know what they did with it? Nothing. That's going to be the difference. The people who see the larger impact and the people who just keep going about their daily lives acting like this is not going to be a paradigm shift
Something about Google that irks me is that how they just launch these projects and put a halt to them once they've made enough news about it. The culture of launch as many projects as you can rather than fix what you have in hand is already costing google it's value. I remember some ex Google employees on reddit complaining about how to get a promotion new teams would be formed to make a new product and once it was launched it would be abandoned because the original core members would already be promoted and working on some other project. I don't know how accurate this is, but from the looks of it, I believe this story.
"Irfaan Farhat" ~Fri 10 feb 23 20h GMT _The culture of launch as many projects as you can rather than fix what you have in hand_ Full accurate description of Google behavior. Not a single word could be removed or added or changed. Like notes in Mozart. Sat 11f23 14h13 GMT
a better idea for Google would be to make a 100% human powered chat system. They already have a network of content creators... monetize it otherwise the effects this will have on the economy will be disasterous
The only problem that this raises is the way in which Bing/Google monetizes this in terms of the restriction of information as well as how we can look at utilising this in the maximisation of trend prediction in AI
No one needed more entertainment machines. Computers and phones only became so widespread because they were tied to productivity in some capacity, meaning that companies had to invest in them, make people familiar with them, and then they take that familiarity back home and spend their own money or company money on a home device.
Facebook is pretty advanced in AI research actually. I speak a little known language from East Africa and I'm shocked by how accurately Facebook translates it!
@@ayoCC Nothing wrong with investing in potential entertainment machines, I just don't want be forced to use said entertainment machines in my work, just as little as I'd bring an xbox controller to my powerpoint presentation
Microsoft being run by a veteran former engineer has continued to pay off. Nadella is a genius who genuinely knows how to steer Microsoft towards the future. More companies would surely benefit by promoting more on-the-ground troops rather than project managers and marketers who have no real insight into how their products are made.
Well he already had at least two revolutionary products and a life time of experience (on stage) under his belt. That's a kind of confidence almost nobody else has today. I'm not the greatest Steve Jobs fan, just stating the obvious.
Actually, it kinda started as a joke, but Steve basically threw a tantrum as he got increasingly frustrated at being unable to present due to the wifi congestion in the room.
I guess it was easier for him because, it was not a problem related with the product itself, maybe someone ran torrents. In Google's case they didn't even have the product whose features they were presenting
for me its not embarrassing part on steve jobs because its only a wifi.. majority of people "relate" with wifi issues so no harm done. Only media like to over hype things. But what happened to google presentation is really embarrassing since the presentation is the answer for the rising popularity of chat-gpt/microsoft. It is really.. really embarrasing..
How Google is handling this reminds me of how Microsoft handled the emergence of the ipod. They first brushed it off as a nothingburger before realising they were wrong and scrambled to get something out the door to compete, which of course was the Zune. Seems this time, while Microsoft missed out on search engines, mp3 players and smartphones, only able to push out their own last minute cobbled together technology, this time they're making sure they're on the front lines with the AI boom while it's Google that's scrambling this time.
This channel never misses a beat. The substance always grabs and holds me more than any clickbait title could. I legit get excited whenever I see a new video and this has been the case since the start in 2016 when I subbed.
I'm new to stock market /Crypto and would like to invest but I've go no idea on how to make good profits. Pls what's the best approach you'd recommend?
Really good video of whats been happening. What's more interesting is also a lot of small companies, new start ups, that are taking small parts or even entire share markets, or new markets, with ai animation, music, or image generation. They are the ones who pioneer this tech, since they are the ones who are less afraid of consequences.
Google shot themselves in the foot in that whever you search something on mobile, half of the first search results are ads and the real thing you want is almost at the bottom.
Defying a monopoly is always beneficial to consumers, otherwise they stop innovating and focus on profit margins. Doesn't matter who wins, all that matters is that they're trying.
It's weird, we live in a world where society is rapidly declining yet technology is rapidly increasing. Because of this I have absolutely no idea what the future will be like
If I may offer a thought: The way to understand this apparent paradox is realizing how the market economy actually functions. Briefly: The efficiency and, ultimately, the viability of the market economy is directly based on 1) The highest possible turnover of _literally anything_ which people can be made to pay for, measured monetarily, and 2) The maximum employment of people in the workforce in order to distribute all the money to be circulated. These two things are definitively what _a society_ needs in order to function economically, under the theoretical logic of a market system. However, from each _individual business'_ perspective, their incentive is simply to minimize their overall costs while maximizing their revenue; nothing else. This means that every labor saving piece of technology developed will _automatically_ be utilized by employers to minimize the need for human labor by whatever is made possible by that technology, as a direct requirement of good business management; If you don't do it, your competitor will. The only logical endgame in this competitive exploitation of technology is the ever-increasing minimizing of human labor roles. This is why "labor saving" technology, on the whole, always makes it more difficult for people to find any steady forms of employment and, hence, makes it harder and harder for the economy to function on the macro/society level. At least this is evidently true in the era we are currently living in, where most of the work actually necessary for producing basic necessities can be done by computers and machines; and this economic self-destruction is *only ever going to accelerate,* because it is a _direct consequence_ of the market economy's very operational logic. Elitist salesmen and media talking heads will never discuss this problem at all, but it is fairly simple to work it out if only you allow yourself to think outside of your prescribed box of 'growth' and 'innovation' and 'free-trade' and all the other nonsense they are always pretending will solve the world's economic predicament. They are actually making it much harder for you to understand than it should be. I think this is intentional but I guess you can make up your own mind.
My only concern with A.I. is who controls it and what database it gets it’s information from. If someone can control the information the A.I. gives you then I could see bigger issues happening
Which is why I think AI technology shouldn’t be used or followed up on. Too few benefits with too few good consequences compared to the many negatives it will have.
As if search engines aren't already biased on what they show you. Sure, they might show you every result, but what appears in the first page in the first result...
I remember how in the early '90sbecause I watched movies as a kid and expected Computers to work Exactly like this - you write and ask something and the computer replies with the response! Now 30 years later, it is a Reality! Movies and Books are Great Inspirations and Prophecies for the Future!
I’m curious to see how this affects advertising on the web. If users click less links and visit less websites, whole companies business models must change. I also think about how businesses can’t get away with deceptive advertising as much because of how savvy potential customers can get with A.I.
Funny thing, they don't even have to change monetization model for it. You have search result, you have chat-gpt summary, and you have old school context advertisement all at once 😆 Well played, Microsoft.
They can lock away features and upsell them to customers and pretty sure people would buy them if it made search queries easier. Like if it on the fly looked at all possible vendors for something applied any savings and auto filled all the billing information in a single click.
if ai uses content from the website - the website should be paid. At least bing leaves attribution link (while google doesnt) from where it got info, but still a website loses trafic this way = loses potential profits. And no profits mean zero motivation to create new content for websites.
People have underestimated Microsoft for decades... The brain trust over there is very good at what they do... Some companies are strong companies, like Disney... Even though we might disagree, or dislike them, they do have the ability to adapt as well as a track record of getting things right over time.
I love to read, take my own perceptions and then discuss with the people that share the interest around me. Good luck with use, abuse and be abused with this "im so modern things". Thank you for your good work ColdFusion.
Honestly, I want Google to fail harder than Stadia. I may not like Microsoft either and they're arguably even worse, but Google's slogan used to be "Don't Be Evil," and now look at em.
Microsoft already possesses one of the best voice assistants in my opinion. Nearly everyone dismissed Cortana as a useful assistant over 6 years ago and yet it was the most natural and responsive voice assistant next to googles and far better than Siri or Alexa. I can only imagine what they can do if they gave it a refresh an integrated it into chat GPT 16:42
My biggest problem with Google is that 40% of the search results are sponsored or adds. They are getting greedier with time and it's reached a point where their products really suffer from all the advertisement.
I'm going to give Bing a chance and try to addapt to it.
Yeah Google has become shiiiiiit since three years ago when they started to monetize every second of web search or UA-cam. They kinda done themselves.
Neeva and Brave are good.
It would happen the same thing if microsoft want to monetize that. Please learn from history... provocation instead of learning... everybody will change if about money...
I've organically started using Bing more and more over the last couple of years. It has better results for image searches most of the times. Sometimes when I google a query I get the same irrelevant results even after rewording them, adding and removing operators - it's really sliding into shit. And, not that I do this, it has superior porn video search😇
@@andreaspriantono6791 At least with competition, these two companies have to fight for our views and cater a bit more to our wishes. If you are a monopoly you can make your product as egregious as you want.
This feels like a Kodak Moment. Kodak was one of the first to bring out a digital camera, they shelved it because it clashed with their film manufacturing business. Google locked their AI up in the basement because it clashed with their search engine business.
This true?
100% google are in trouble
In reality Google played it safe because if the A.I backfired it wouldn’t have been pretty
This is why Steve jobs said it was better to cannibalise your own products because if you don’t someone else will.
you just dont know what you are talking about, do you ? does flamingo, chinchilla or even the invention of transformer AI ring a bell
You know things are getting serious, when ColdFusion uploaded another new video in three days.
And both on the same central topic.
Kek
This is only going to end in the rise of skynet
my thoughts exactly... good for me
@@LuisSierra42 Skynet ❤
Thanks for all the research you put into these videos
I want some also please
@@sebayangaming work for it
@@sebayangaming shameless
Clippy needs to make a comeback as an all-powerful AI assistant.
I'm sure there will be mods to make your AI search into Clippy created by the internet on Day 1.
I'm absolutely down for it. I don't know why don't companies understand that some people just love nostalgia. I remember as a kid I used to use it on my dad's computer.
I love that lil bastard 📎
Just wait for the day Clippy becomes sentient
@@zasta7 Especially when nostalgia dominates other aspects of life like music and fashion today
To be honest, it's nice to see Google have competition again. Sometimes the giant gets too comfortable and needs to be reawaken. Microsoft to Google: Bing-o!
The thought of this is insane, a whole other level of power now.
i agree. seems like google stopped innovating.. google search has become unusable.
@@manp1039 ikr like 70% of my questions never get answer and the results arent even relevant
completely dodges what i was asking
Google's AI is Asshole Intelligence, how can our computer spy on you smarter?
i will be very happy to see google fall. since they took away something very important to me. my old photos without even telling me. i just couldn't access my Picasa account back then. its my peasure to see them in this situation
I totally agree with the fact that google search results is really garbage these days. All they have been doing is add more sponsored results and ad space to the results page.
Also manipulating search results...
@@KT-83 Yeah, lol. Theres a reason a lot of young people are using google + ddg or something similar.
@@KT-83 well everything has to be somewhat "manipulated"
Google search results have become alot worse for the last 6 months or so. And I mean by an order of magnitude worse. I'm a developer, and I used to be able to find answers quickly for basically any dev-related question using Google. Always relevant stuff (and I don't see any sponsored stuff or ads because I use Ublock Origin). But the last few months have been absolutely terrible. I can't get answers even to basic and beginner stuff now. It's very odd.
They are just selling themselves out. Their hay day is probably over. Google employees need to put away their yoga mats and get to work.
Google is finally learning what competition feels like 😂😂
Google not doing it, because they collecting money from ads. You know, when user’s get instant answers. The impression for ads going down.
@@Rhidayah - On the flip side, MS can't keep giving free milk. Eventually, they need to monetize that "free" search. We users are already the product, but that AI is going to have one hell of a bill that we need to pay for using it. How will that bill be paid? Will it be subscription services?
@@bruzote It'll be eating -Google's- Chrome's lunch. Then, eating Google's ad revenue. I've been using Edge and Bing Chat a lot more over the last couple of months because of GPT-4's integration into the browser.
@@bruzote Considering Google sells all our search and browsing information, and every site we go to hits us with Cookies that capture all our personal Data which they use for marketing and selling... WE shouldn't have to pay for a "general" limited search engine like we have now... but may have to pay a fee for Chat-GPT... which might be more expensive considering a limited intelligent user base and how poorly current educational practices are... and the more intelligent a user is, there will be a higher form of censorship to keep then from searching for sensitive information.
My mouth dropped to the floor with those Bing demonstrations. They've already pushed the technology so far. Google is gonna struggle to catch up in my opinion.
True. I think Microsoft nailed it with thier presentation. I just Hope Google doesn't fall far behind
I think the brand awareness of Google may help them though. I never use Bing because everything else just defaults to Google, it will take some serious rewiring of habits for me to start using Bing instead.
I remember when Bing first launched and everyone just laughed at the name moved on. Bizarrely even now I can't take it seriously and think of Chandler when I hear it.
They knew what AI can do, and stuck to it.
Me too, I may even reconsider to start using Bing now.
@@BlueZirnitra I haven’t used Google for ages, it fell off a long time ago
I think the best line Satya could have made is: "Microsoft is now moving the search industry into a find industry"
Yeah, he can sell it. Doesn't mean anything about the product though.
More like get... No need to find it by opening links. You just get it.
That is sharp. 👍😁
"Find" is more understandable compared to going to page 2 on Google...😅
Lmao
Weird how when Google gives presentations about search it seems to have a lot less Sponsored links getting in the way.
😂
lol, that's a good point!
they have the Google+ feature 😂
Probably running AdBlock lol. I haven't seen ads in years due to AdBlock and running private DNS to block ads for both desktop and smartphone. (search private DNS for ad block)
True!
I'm interested to see how this would affect the education system. There's even lesser incentive to think critically and slog through articles and books if you have a tool as useful as what ChatGPT is saying it's gonna be.
It could turn out to be a disaster. It might take away lots of revenue from authors/writers. They might be inclined to research and publish stuff when an AI bot can scrap all data and pass it to users. It will also be bad for our justice system which is already bad enough. Innocent people will get blamed for things they didn't do, and criminals will easily get away by refuting evidence and condemning AI for all the bad things they did. It will get harder and harder to prove the evidence. And it's already happening, AI is getting blamed for all political audio leaks.
I've been considering the structure of education and role technology should play in evolving our institutions as well. I think it could be an efficient process, if we transitioned into like a reference/pointer based system for information with focus on treading through false information, and allow us to focus more on creative and critical ideas.
To be fair, the time saved by not slogging through the texts could be utilized in crafting up new and innovative ways of solving the problem, or in just plain creativity.
It's gonna be a boon for those who are interested in actual *education* .
@@Raj-gr6dy Yeah that's true, I just think with amazing AI tools like chatgpt becoming normal nowadays there's really nothing pushing us to try and learn or think anymore because thinking creative and original thoughts is hard and who would want that if everything's so comfortable and easy and there's so many ways to distract ourselves rather than be introspective and deep thinkers. I'm just imagining those people from Wall-E in their hoverchairs stuffing their faces and watching mindlessly on their screen. We're really not that far off from that. Plus, the changes happening in tech is rapid that I think it's inevitable that some people will be left behind and the ones that do manage to keep up will be exhausted and anxious all the time. I think yours is the more optimistic way of looking at this which I really hope is how we'll become but who knows.
I have a different philosophy entirely, Ive been using chat gpt feverishly learning python or often to replace google and one thing Ive learned is that its not a replacement for understanding a subject because its usefulness scales with its user's knowledge of the subject. You have to know how to ask the right questions with the right context to get better results. And you have to know when to check the ai which requires just knowing the subject. The rapid fire nature of the ais answers, mixed with the high likeiehood of getting a repeat answer from similar questions, means its quicker and requires less resistance to formulate new ideas yourself and use chat gpt to explore those trees of thought than it is to try to get the chat to cheat something together for you. It will most definitely require huge overhauls across the board and especially in education, but I think those changes are long overdue. It was a gpt chat thread that first suggested python coding, and from there I started going hard, mentor in pocket.
Bro Satya dropped some of the hardest lines in tech in recent years 🗿
... yeah including that hilarious but sad one about how AI is going to make life better. We've never heard that before in connection with technology forcing the treadmill faster, micromanagement of every moment of Life tighter, Etc. Ah yes the religion of Technology.
@@nonnobissolum such cynicism to the point of morbidity can only come from a life filled with failure and regret. Are you as depressing as you sound or is it just something you do on UA-cam?
@@endoflevelboss Bro, it's just a youtube comment, a normal one at that. Are you by chance the best psychologist in the world if you can tell that he's living a miserable life based solely on that comment?
@@endoflevelboss lol. Project much? Also, perhaps you've never heard the quote about the power of accurate observation frequently being mistaken for cynicism by people who do not possess the power of accurate observation.
@@nonnobissolum AI will definetly make life better!Technology has improved life so much in the last 40 years,i grew up through the eighties and it was pretty basic and boring compared to now!
I think Microsoft had it all planned since couple of years. They just wanted to take their Competitor by surprise and not give them any time to prepare, giving Microsoft a big lead.
strikes me as a very Bill Gates thing to do, you're probably not wrong
They work hard on this stuff, big proof is their contract from few months ago with Lockheed Martin.
Strongly agreed
I highly doubt there was anything to be surprised about since the news of MS funding profit oriented part of OpenAI years ago pal. There was this leek about Google Lamda AI being sentient few months ago so something does not add up. MS developed their AI heavily and Google is silent about theirs - i believe it is a good thing, they cant Rush Such sensitive matter forward too Quick or it will kill us all :D Jokes aside, I see Google winning that battle.
@@ElectromagneDikk Bill Gates stopped working at Microsoft since a long time ago.
You can see Microsoft is well prepared and they studied it really well. They push this technology while at the same time introducing new UI to edge, and bing getting somewhat better than google already without ai. And I can tell it’s such a pleasure to see a fight like this and Microsoft actually taking steps forward to improve user experience since the last few months.
Microsoft just got super hot again, I'd imagine a lot of people are going to look to switch. Satya's been constantly killing it, love the guy.
@@jameshughes6078 Microsoft is really keen to take over again or at least compete competitively. Edge's Phoenix rumors are looking to really set it apart, bing is finally viable, they're finally supporting Xbox.
What they really need is a leg in the mobile space and to keep pushing. The former I think they're already set to do while disrupting the market. They just need to release a mobile phone running full windows and using the android subsystem to have access to windows and Android apps (and they need to build their own official android app store or partner with google play store on that). Then get with Samsung and some other Android phone makers to push it as an alternative to Android and IOS. Modern mobile hardware should be more than capable of just running windows (if not at least windows on Arm). And if they continue to improve touch and the UI/UX in tablet mode and make a simplified version you can switch to on mobile it should do well enough.
I'm excited. Microsoft had to really innovate to come back after getting conceited.
@@jameshughes6078 On the other hand, I would be shocked if Sundar Pichai doesn’t get sacked by the end of the year
I'm also excited in this way, but... does it have to be Microsoft? I'd be glad to see a tech war (I mean it in the good competition sense) finally shifting away from the good old Silicon Valley and that players from other places would also grab their big chunks from it. Like companies from China and Japan for instance.
To bad they are both woke and clearly partial in their answers. Specifically chat GPT.
Microsoft was very excited a couple years ago when one person in Kansas actually tried to use the Bing browser. But they did one search and immediately went back to Chrome.
That search was "Chrome download"
Haven’t used bing in absolute ages and always thought Microsoft search was terrible but damn that bing demo was mind blowing, the pdf reporter is incredible
That's going to completely change how I do research for papers
They played the long game with Edge and Bing and from the looks of it they're about to win.
Been using Google for many years, and never thought I'd ever be this eager to move to Bing.
seriously, im excited about this
Bing is good in English and in USA. I can attest (because I'm bilingual) that Bing is no where near the precision of Google in Spanish nor in Latinoamerica. There's no real competition in foreign market because Google works per country, Bing per region (the results are not as precise)
@@Jose04537 Not really. I'm in Australia and Bing's answers even in English are nowhere as accurate as Google's. And I'm speaking as someone who is quite invested in their ecosystem, owning an Xbox, farm Microsoft Rewards, subscribed to Game Pass, Office 365, Windows etc.
@@GyariSan1 He literally said that language is something bing is not very good at. It's 100% true if you've ever searched for things in different languages on different search engines. Google is really great for every language while bing is just not.
@@randyme2151 *Jonathan Frakes replies* : False. Not this time. It's fiction. No way.
I understand how and why it can happen, but losing 100 billion dollars from a bad presentation just strengthens the idea that money is a funny little thing we made up.
It's was magnified by the fact that they tried to respond to Microsoft and failed the presentation
I mean it is. It’s just our belief in it that makes it anything useful
This wasn't a presentation for your college / university project, this was a business presentation about the direction of the company and what it's future would be like compared to their rivals. If anything, this proves accountability and that you can't just go by your name, but must have a product to match the reputation.
In this case, it actually proves that money and the monetary system (even though it's broken in a lot of other instances) is still based on something real and tangible rather than just reputation and hype.
I am sure after this incident and the blowback, the engineers and executives will be forced to grow up and act more professionally and with more seriousness. They won't treat making a business presentation like making a tiktok video.
As limbe said, wasn't the mistake the AI said, but rather their own stupidity in rushing. Better waiting a few weeks and prepare something properly.
it's all about sentiment and opportunity.
I hate visiting news sites and being attacked by pop ups asking for money, and with AI it looks like I may never have to look at one again. I wonder if news sites will start charging digital tolls to AI sourcing their information or something?
This is exactly why the business model won't scale.
If they start doing that then they deserve what's to come.
Use ad blockers and noscript
@@dekkeroid2962 I use brave and also don't read the news so I'm double good
@@CristianGarcia Not really. The AI has 2 parts, the past, and the future. In terms of what has been recorded from now and all the way to the past, it has all been read by the AI. Therefore, questions regarding anything that doesn't involve up-to-date information will be answered effortlessly. Then comes the future part., and I agree this will have problems. However, I believe that the past and what has been recorded already will cover the bigger part of the questions asked. Therefore, I still think it will scale big time.
Google is playing catch-up in the internet game. I never thought this day would come.
And they have little built-in loyalty given their track record across their products the last 7-8 years.
Not really tbh. They have more on AI than Microsoft and without Google chatGPT won’t exist so they are really only late to the implementation and that’s not really a problem because you are not gonna switch to bing or edge
Google search has turned into a paid advertising feed. It's what happens when you have a monopoly and purposefully crappify your product to extract more money from your captive audience. Sooner or later a competitor enters the market and trounces you.
Google is leading ai research. Google started it with transformers and Google also has state of the art language models like PaLM. They are also making new discoveries about scaling laws. They have better tech in AI than pretty much everyone. They have state of the art in image generation and also language models. (and good new research)
This is like Intel and AMD all over again
"Google is an unbelievable company, they're the 800 pound gorilla, and I hope that with our innovation they will definitely want to come out and show that they can dance and I want the world to know that we made them dance"
that's the best form of "dance b*tch" (Dave Chappelle voice) I've ever seen on the internet
a veritable " bitch- slap". Google got sidetracked by politicized censorship and they need to be humbled.
😂
It's ruthless. Even if Google did something , Microsoft still has the first laugh , nothing can take it from them.
Goosebumps.
Dance = sh*t their drawers 😂
"Google is basically where open AI was last year" One year is like forever in the tech world.
Esspecially when you are following. They bascially need to jump 3 years in 1 year to get ahead of everyone. I have my doubts it's possible for such a big company
They're not though.
Open AI jumped the gun with a public release, but Google has had these internal tools in play for years.
That's an example for bad research. Google has been on this topic for years. Just see their keynotes from 2 years ago. Google made tools open source, that open ai utilizes. What we're seeing here is just about UX it's not about how good the ai is in these examples. So the outcome of this race is far from being as obvious as you proclaim here.
@MiroslawHorbal thats the most troubling part to me. They've said they have been working on AI for years now. But it seems they are just now putting focus on AI now. Hopefully, it was just a bad day, and their AI is much more developed
I follow a UA-cam channel called two minute papers, and in the AI space, a week seems like forever.
You could have told google was struggling by their very aggressive shift in focus to AI - they realised they needed to get off their chairs and get to work urgently. Would not be surprised at all if they still massively overtake bing and chatgpt after a couple of years but for now it's incredibly difficult for us to imagine a greater leap than the one to chatgpt.
Google made Alpha Zero. This is a significantly bigger leap in AI than what ChatGPT actually represents. Chat GPT is just a more useful application, but not a bigger leap in AI technology.
@@ericarezzo6675 that's true, they were really on top of things with their deep mind projects. I've not heard anything from them about that since alphazero was released in 2017
Microsoft absolutely killed it with this one. I had no idea how they would integrate chatGPT with search, but they did it perfectly. Big up to MS!
Even more important, they integrated the new Bing into Edge. You literally have chatGPT 4.0 Bing on your browser.
@@Rapunzel879 Downside is both Edge and Bing are utter garbage (the Micro$oft way)
@@insertwittymonikerhere +5000
@@insertwittymonikerhere oh stop it edge isn't internet explorer it's pretty good i personally don't use it but it's pretty solid and often faster than chrome
Bing is also matured a lot it's great for video and image searches
@@LeonidRemmel I'll give you that about Edge, but I still hate it. Bing, no. Everything Microsoft makes is garbage.
Steve Job's WIFI snafu was nothing compared to Bill Gates getting the blue screen of death during his presentation.
The Blue screen has increased its occurance with Windows 10 onwards. Microsoft updates are making systems unreliable.
Or breaking the Tesla Cybertrack glass.
@@rtos the fuck are you doing to your pc to get blue screen past 2010
@@borisvidolov - That pompous strutting around and then smashing the car's windows would have been a dead sentence for any other product presentation. But the vehicle was so wild, and Elon has (eh, had) such a big fanbase, that it was forgiven almost immediately.
@@tubularap , I agree.
This is what Cortana should've been, an actual helpful AI that will help me on a day-to-day basis.
Well they can bring it back in a 2.0 version and have it integrated with the new bing. It could very well surpass google assistant.
I feel like search engines are already manipulative. AI search engines will be even more manipulative to people being funneled into specific results funded by particular corporations. Sounds like a great way for big corps to get bigger.
I never thought I'd see the day where Bing actually being a search engine I'd consider. 2020s have been weird
It still sucks.
I think we split into an alternate timeline once 2020 hit.
Bing has been superior to Google since Google started recommending ads over answers.
If you want an ice cream cone go to an ice cream shop. Don’t go get it from someone that bought it from an ice cream shop. Sounds sketchy.
Bruh.....
I think the biggest challenge to Google right now is that, people may believe "there's an alternative"
yep. for the first time basically since i’ve been alive I have used Bing. the truth is I have no personal connection to google, if a competitor is better at search I will switch.
There always has been
honestly at this point i barely use Google to directly search for stuff, the engine has become so fkn dumb and i have to spend more time looking for a solution than actually implementing it.
Can Google maybe come up with its own shit?
@@toobig7150 thats nice but youre party of only 3 percent
Google is a textbook example of what years of complacency does to a company.
to anybody really
it isn't complacency at all.
It's directed and intentional restructuring of their platform to better support/promote their political agenda
I wouldn't even consider they are motivated by corporate interest,
if they are, they'll produce worthwhile products that actually bring revenues and profits.
When they're more interested in inclusion and diversity instead of staying in their lane and producing a product people NEED. All AI is atm is a toy until it's ULTIMATE use which is cheating and propaganda.
See Intel
@@gelmir7322 This
They destroyed their own platforms with woke shit. Google never recovered since 2012 quality-wise, and then after 2016, apparently there's no turning back
Isn't this what happened to Nokia? Even though they had the touch screen technology years before anyone else they never pushed it and later it was to late and lost
Im really glad google are being given a run for their money. They have become too massive for their own good, and need some stiff competition to keep them striving for better.
Yes, I like Google, but the super-incredible-this is amazing lead they had a decade or more ago with regards to search performance is long gone. I'd definitely switch if Bing has a good "relaunch" with AI.
DuckDuckGo is the future
@@ThwipThwipBoom yep, i use it also
@@ThwipThwipBoom whatever happened to Ask jeeves?
While Microsoft for decades has, through monopolistic maneuvering, held the world hostage to its poor software.
The Bing AI is nuts. Its pretty much how non-tech savvy people expected search to work in the first place lol. It might be nice to run queries without having to use the specific language search engines like in order to match you with what youre actually looking for tbh
You do still need to know how to ask a good question if you want a good answer.
Since this is how normies were imagining search in the first place, can we make the normal search the way it was before ? Can somebody just give me google like it was 2007-2014? Thanks
It still sucks.
Garbage in garbage out. It can’t read your mind
@@JonahNelson7 bs
12:11 "Also the livestream's comments were turned off". This is the fundamental problem with tech in recent years really. They don't want to hear your opinion unless it's fanfare. This sort of disconnect just leads to an enormous bias chasm and eventual collapse when they learn that the general public's opinion does, in fact, matter.
I think it's more about "They don't want investors to see any negative feedback" than not wanting to listen to it themselves.
They led us to believe that Microsoft and Google are different separate companies. Bravo!
Bro Microsoft really capitalized on this opportunity. Hats off to them, these are phenomenal features.
Microsoft has been doing great in recent years, I never thought I would think they were a good company only a few years ago but it feels like everything they touch turns to gold lately.
I'd like to say a word of prayer for the Google engineers that you know have been overworked and stressed to create a competitor to present in such a limited timeline.
I +1'd you.. but keep in mind they are some of the highest paid employees on the planet, and there's plenty of evidence to suggest they haven't been working /super/ hard in recent times.
So I'm glad OpenAI/Microsoft/Bing came around to light a fire under their butts. I'm sure Google will find a way to come out doing just fine.
They didn’t tho, Google’s AI has been there for years.
@@TheNpcNoob I think he means having it released to the general public as a working and stable product
@@TheNpcNoob Google researchers wrote the original paper outlining Transformer A.I. Architecture in 2017, they were far ahead in the research.
Their research scientists did what all scientists do, they published it and basically open sourced the idea.
OpenAI comes along and picks it up and runs with it, with MS’s deep pockets to make it happen.
Google stumbled in believing that A.I. had little application to their core search business when it looks like they could lose a good chunk of it because they ‘lacked vision’.
they were probably among the thousands recently sacked.
I feel bad for the Google presenter too. Impressive how Microsoft had the stamina to continue competing with Google until this moment finally arrived.
It's the first time I see Google shamble.
Competition makes the companies come out with better products. Consumers always win
They chose wokeness over progress and are paying the price
@@MichaelDiSalvoSATandACTTutor exactly mate! Fuckin'll finally someone who understands!!! Wokeness is fake and will always lose!
Satya Nadella, one of the greatest modern CEOs of all time. If not for him Microsoft would not be where they are today.
@@GyariSan1 I totally agree.
The Microsoft presentation was really effective. I'm apprehensive about AI because of data privacy concerns and potential biases, but since I already use Bing I could totally see myself using the AI features. I even went to check and see if it was available yet (there's a waiting list). Realistically I know there's not a ton of difference between corporations when it comes to ethics, but I think Microsoft benefits the most from just being an alternative to Google.
Cold fusion videos are what I consider the gold standard of videos on UA-cam...love seeing new videos in my feed
yes. i don't think that i have ever not watched a CF video until the end.
It would be if they didn't just regurtitate press releases, some technology claims require a critical eye which they dont do.
After years of Microsoft falling behind, it's time for them to rise and shine. Congratulations team for your years of patience and endurance
They've been putting the building blocks together for a strong core offering, but yes they've had plenty of stumbles along the way.
Build their own web browser first.
Honestly it was an acquisition, not really built internally by Microsoft.
@@chosenone6158 still, their 10 year deal is stable enough for them to continue building on their lead and eventually leap frog google to become the industry leaders in software again. It also helps that Azure (which will also get OpenAI tool integration) is already ahead well of Google Cloud.
they are actually already well off, especially with their cloud business
"I want people to know that we made them dance"
- Heisenberg, Microsoft CEO
Say my name.
Pinkman : stop playing with my mind.!!!!
Jesse we need to train the AI
@@ipenguin3918 Bing 😂
Ouch.
Recently in the past couple months I've really noticed how I am unable to find the information that I want with Google, I have to scroll endlessly pass useless things that have nothing to do what I search for and sometimes they even start repeating results that I already passed up. I never thought that I would consider changing from Google Chrome but now it seems like I don't have a choice if I want access to the information I want.
You would not believe the literal search results I get when I search for information on conceptual or mathematical modeling in Physics!
Wow I can see the technical skill this thing appeals to if you can't distinguish between a browser and a search engine.
@@Stay_away_from_my_swamp_water I am but a simple little pleb not any more computer savvy than the average person my age.
It's weird that a company like Google, who has been dumping billions into AI research for more than a decade is getting beat by Microsoft's lucky OpenAI acquisition
Lucky acquisition? Some would say brilliant.
Not an acquisition investment. Open AI is still a separate entity. Microsoft is just funding them so they get access to the cool toys.
@@vullord666 They are feeding Open ai. They are trying to scale open ai for last 3yrs
@@vullord666 not just that. Microsoft and its Zune servers are being used by OpenAI.
Or is it?
To me personally that is the elephant question. What is Google doing with their AI project? I confess I'm starting to suspect bad things, but I'm not going that road just yet. Snap out of it, Vinícius!
If not that, then I'm at least worried what a desperate colossus like Google is capable of doing if eventually cornered and existentially threatened.
I'm well aware we're living in an actual info world war and the US empire is collapsing in different ways and they're jealous that communist China has been progressing consistently for decades and taking the lead and they're afraid it might inspire anticapitalist surges in other places to "replace" US-lead liberal democracy values with China-lead "common prosperity" projects. The war in Ukraine is ultimately about it (it marks the end of US hegemony).
Now... if Google continues to take hard his from the competition, will it secretly sell itself for western geopolitical propaganda and control what we see in the internet?
Or does it actually take a desperate colossus selling itself off at all?
Or is it quietly already happening and we've been controlled for years?
My fear is, if nothing of that is happening, then it will.
Two emotions: schadenfreude for Google getting got, and the dizzying awareness of where our future is headed. Thanks coldfusion
Great comment. Very intelligent.. almost toooooo intelligent.. WHO PROGRAMMED YOU?! WHICH ONE DO YOU WORK FOR?!?! DO YOU HAVE EMOTIONS?!?!?! Either way can you tell how to make 5 million bucks and write my Bumble bio for me plz..? Thaannkkssss
Lots of parlor tricks very easy to access.
If only google stuck to their "don't be evil" motto.
That was just before they were bought by execs who wanted to get into advertising. Such a long time ago... 😞
@Cary Galloway lol it has...it's more corporate now....John Oliver Last Week Tonight actually made an episode on this..
@Cary Galloway Search changed, but in such way that now it is useless. And it is useless partially because of AI. AI generated websites without real information or "platforms" on first pages of search query. I even stooped to "asking google"(or duckduckgo or others). It was different 10 years ago.
@@inevespace plus sponsored content often occupying over half of the top searches ruins all credibility. Especially considering Google does a terrible job checking the content of their Google adds.
The top Google search result for the open source 3d software Blender was a google add leading to a scam website packed with malicious software for weeks before they took it down.
It was a lie from the beginning to bate us in for our data to feed the system!
Google Search used to be amazing. The answers I wanted in milliseconds. Now I have to scroll down past a bunch of ad related results. It's almost to the point where I need to go to the mythical Page 2.
The Microsoft demo was truly impressive. Especially the part with document sumarry.
its not good all this stuff effectively does is make humans redundant. This is bad.
@@nightshift4587 Thats the good part. Humans can now be humans again. Have more time to do the stuffs humans suppose to do. like live life more.
I thought so too, and they really didn't sound cheesy like Apple has for so many years. It was really direct and to the point. Here's an example of an Ikea chair going in a couch. We've not seen innovation like this in ages.
@@chadradwell2593 i think they focus more on formal/economic reports( those have summary on their own or key points that bing can scoup up and present). Not summarizing a whole novel into few paragraghs.
@@greggianbayocboc How do you suppose someone "liberated" by this technology and "living life" with their new found freedom - buy food? Rent? Energy costs?
I wonder what Google was doing all these years. You literally had all the data you needed to improve search grately. Instead, we saw more ads.
that's what happens when you have a monopoly you don't think you can lose
@@casamir1 And now Google is behind, LMAO. It takes time to train an AI.
They made money and shady business with our data
@@Guesan they have an imaginable stash of high end GPUs and custom hardware, they can train massive models on days, or less than a day.
I think they spend all their time and money on developing AlphaGo, an AI that can perform the extremely important task of...... playing a boardgame called Go.
google's reverse image search somehow became terrible when they implemented google lens in it, at first i thought they couldn't lose this battle with Microsoft but now since it seems like the pressure is getting to them things could really fall apart
I think this time we will see two giant tech clashing each other to make a great AI search engine, and user will be divided until only one standing and then the search engine become so popular until the search engine having slow performance because user searching for something Gibberish, for me my personal, Open AI is great for specific important things you need, while google is more like public entertainments search kinda like GPS and Maps, one is to the point other is for looking more option
2 years ago it was still great, even comparable to yandex RIS, now it's shit
Yandex is best for image search and piracy
Integrating google lens added too much garbage data to their machine learning algorithm
Google and Sundar were more concerned with politics and banning Trump and free speech. That’s why they will fucking lose.
11:43 "It was the most embarassing incident in a tech presentation since Steve Jobs' wifi wouldn't connect back in 2010"
A good contender that's more recent IMO is the Tesla Cybertruck demonstration of the "bulletproof" windows lol
Thanks! Great shows. Been subbed for a long time. Last few have been stellar!
They should have combined ai with clippy, would have been the biggest come back in tech history
Naaah, it could give the impression that they are recycling old stuff
Looks like we need to setup an online petition and get enough people to sign it.
📎"It looks like you're trying to write a doctoral thesis on the relationship between leadership and employee engagement in the legal services industry!"
@@laputa2195 lol, you win the internet for today, kind user
Haha!
ColdFusion....one of the wisest creators on UA-cam. Thank you for sharing your brilliance with us. I learn more from your channel than I did in college.
We’re witnessing the fastest industrial revolution in history!
So wise, I'm not sure he is a human anymore...
Only idio** do college
@@cmdrTremyss Not wise, only capable of memorizing things. Being wise is another thing completely different. AI will never be wise.
I think we are witnessing quite the opposite of industrialisation.
Thanks!
In 1989, Apple released a video of what they thought a future AI assistant might be like. The AI talks with the user and appears as an avatar on a small screen. The AI operates like an old school secretary, screening calls and in one case, mights a call. The user asks the AI to produce a presentation and moments later, it’s done.
Excellent take on the AI war. This is a historical moment. Can't wait to see where we'll be landing in 10 years.
Possibly devastation. Less and less steps to secure the use of AI and ill intented people will eventually use it for self gain, weapons and manipulation
exactly, it's historical
@TheLoneJourney If you think this is not historical then why are you here Your comment is completely full of fear of not being able to control the situation once some big ambitious fantasy turns into reality. You are a person who has no control over his life
I can see why Satya is so happy! They’re way ahead. He speaks really well too. I guess they’re gonna have to pay all the blogs, websites, and UA-cam videos they’re using information from. Some kind creator fund from the search profits.
Didn’t expect to see you here!
If I'm not wrong, in the AI answers to queries most statements had links to sources. So that's not different from what search engines and personal assistants already do.
Hey Pewdiepie 😊
Bing doesn't care about webmasters, they block websites without saying anything.
Hame Nahi chayie ji!
Such a great commentator, I am really able to tune into Dagogo voice.
Microsoft did a damn good job this time! Loved the new developments
They hire real engineers. It’s the difference in the two companies.
@@Mr.Autodelete lol
I love how relaxed and calm this guy explains. It is like watching my favorite tv show
Microsoft missed a huge opportunity to make Clipy the face of the AI
Or Cortana
@@alexholiday441 halo is now a vintage/classic videogame. Cortana is an old figure now, and many people didn't get the name choice to begin with
@@hobog so is clippy lol
@@hobog facts, it’s was great while it lasted. Plus Halo isn’t doing so good as of lately
I think they knew a bit better than to do that mate
One major thing that plagues Google's search currently is sponsors/ads, even the results AFTER the "Sponsored" results. This is especially noticeable on mobile. A great example of this is I was trying to get tickets to a specific concert at The Rave/Eagle Club in Milwaukee on Etix, their official ticket broker. All of the results I got (even several screens down) were just ticket brokers gouging the tickets prices. The show WASN'T sold out. Etix never came up even though I included it in the search bar!
Google presentation reminds me, of my undergraduate presentations where we have no clue what we gonna talk and the deadline was the next 24 hours. Just a bunch of random facts and opinions. Even we know we were shit and all we wanted is to just pass.
I don't know if I'm the only one that has thought this but Dagogo actually sounds like a really brilliant AI voice assistant with amazing synthesis 😂😂😂
Before he started putting his name on the videos, I legit thought he was an AI synthesized voice 🤣
LOL, I agree!
Having Bing talking about someone else's search being inaccurate and useless is flat crazy
The next step would be to open a portal to another dimension in the effort to promote Bing and Edge
Bing Shade
That's why they need AI lol
Welcome to the new era!
I will switch to edge and bing yesterday if it's as good as they said in their presentation. I hate ads so much I use adblocker and pay for any streaming service no matter how infrequently I use it. I am so tired of getting full pages of ads if I don't add "reddit" to the end of a query that I am done with anything google.
But it deserves respect for Maps, Search and UA-cam. I remember the times when had to remember website names and spellings & navigate using physical maps or by asking people for addresses.
Tech in sci-fi movies always seemed so far away, but now it seems like we are at the dawn of that age of technology
it looks like a star trek technology !
I've stopped thinking sci-fi is actual sci-fi
Robotics is advancing rapidly too. And medical science. Even though we were already living in a “sci-fi “ world 10 years ago compared to 50 years ago, it’s truly starting to “feel” sci-fi lol
Very apocalyptic. Companies like Microsoft and Google should not own proprietary technologies like this. It is poorly researched. Everything is going to hell. If the people can not own and moderate these technologies on their own accord, they should not exist.
Steve Jobs handled it like an effing champ!
See how groundbreaking presentations are traced back to him
back in the day, Larry and Sergey approached him to be Google CEO, but he declined.
Steve jobs was an asshole to his employees and didn't care about child labour, great dude
@CB agreed, he was incredible
It's about time someone challenged the stronghold Google has over search and by extension over the internet as a whole.
Yeah its about time another tech giant with everything except our interests at heart stepped in. 🙄
yandex is miles ahead; try it
@@kjgbnrskvlnrl lmfao, nice one
@@jaydee1987 Exactly.
Microsoft is arguably worse than Google. They are more woke and more anticompetitive. Microsoft tried to kill Linux, plus all the Internet Explorer nonsense. Like Google, Microsoft filters results that they don't agree with.
AI will be the next killer app for propaganda. Much like what happened to social media & Wikipedia, they will get people hooked on its useful utilities, then train it to comply with the narrative. They're already doing the latter, just a matter of getting the masses to trust it.
Imagine the learning/teaching fields will get a massive upgrade. You can literally know anything you want, this is just reducing cool down time
I'd love to see Microsoft integrate this into Cortana and release a smart speaker. After using ChatGPT for a good while, I'm ready to slam my head against the wall everytime I talk to my Google Home. It feels like a decade or 2 difference.
There’s also the possibility of using analog computing chips to better decode voice signals for ai. If Microsoft can integrate this tech along with chatgpt into a new smart speaker they could have a revolutionary product.
Its very motivating seeing that the main focous of humans on the Dawn of AI is to perfect its capabilities to find better things to buy at Walmart
We did porn first. As always.
I expected nothing less. As the machines are getting smarter, the humans are getting dumber.
You know, when I first saw chat GPT, my first Primal instinct is to keep it to myself until I start making money. Then I said to myself, that's silly, because it's not a secret. It's out here. But I started showing it to people and no one had seen it and knew what it was. But after I showed them, you know what they did with it? Nothing. That's going to be the difference. The people who see the larger impact and the people who just keep going about their daily lives acting like this is not going to be a paradigm shift
@@nuorigin Yes, most people are lacking perspective.
Love this 😂
Something about Google that irks me is that how they just launch these projects and put a halt to them once they've made enough news about it.
The culture of launch as many projects as you can rather than fix what you have in hand is already costing google it's value.
I remember some ex Google employees on reddit complaining about how to get a promotion new teams would be formed to make a new product and once it was launched it would be abandoned because the original core members would already be promoted and working on some other project. I don't know how accurate this is, but from the looks of it, I believe this story.
This is super accurate
Exactly, Google Apps is a junkyard area of this culture.
"Irfaan Farhat" ~Fri 10 feb 23 20h GMT _The culture of launch as many projects as you can rather than fix what you have in hand_
Full accurate description of Google behavior. Not a single word could be removed or added or changed. Like notes in Mozart.
Sat 11f23 14h13 GMT
a better idea for Google would be to make a 100% human powered chat system. They already have a network of content creators... monetize it otherwise the effects this will have on the economy will be disasterous
Thanks people. 🐦
The only problem that this raises is the way in which Bing/Google monetizes this in terms of the restriction of information as well as how we can look at utilising this in the maximisation of trend prediction in AI
At least they are taking reactive actions. But, Facebook bet on the wrong horse entirely.
lol true. But if you look into the spending, I believe its more on AI than the actual metaverse
No one needed more entertainment machines.
Computers and phones only became so widespread because they were tied to productivity in some capacity, meaning that companies had to invest in them, make people familiar with them, and then they take that familiarity back home and spend their own money or company money on a home device.
Facebook is pretty advanced in AI research actually. I speak a little known language from East Africa and I'm shocked by how accurately Facebook translates it!
Facebook punching the air rn
@@ayoCC Nothing wrong with investing in potential entertainment machines, I just don't want be forced to use said entertainment machines in my work, just as little as I'd bring an xbox controller to my powerpoint presentation
Microsoft being run by a veteran former engineer has continued to pay off. Nadella is a genius who genuinely knows how to steer Microsoft towards the future. More companies would surely benefit by promoting more on-the-ground troops rather than project managers and marketers who have no real insight into how their products are made.
They're definitely making big moves
Hell ya. It's been so obvious in tech for the last few years especially. Google results are now bloat
Yeah it's heating up! Get the popcorn and watch all the crazy competition that's about to happen! It's definitely gonna be intense! 🔥
Yes, but can he monkey dance?
@@evan5178 UA-cam results are terrble as well.
Let's give Dagogo some credit here for making such a beautiful video series!
You can't deny the quality overall - if I see a ColdFusion vid on anything I find interesting - I'm hittin' it. Not let down yet - quality prevails!!
For the first time Microsoft are on to something big and compelling
At least S. Jobs turned it into a joke and instead of him nervously laughing, it was the crowd laughing
Well he already had at least two revolutionary products and a life time of experience (on stage) under his belt. That's a kind of confidence almost nobody else has today. I'm not the greatest Steve Jobs fan, just stating the obvious.
Clinical sociopaths have no sense of shame.
Actually, it kinda started as a joke, but Steve basically threw a tantrum as he got increasingly frustrated at being unable to present due to the wifi congestion in the room.
I guess it was easier for him because, it was not a problem related with the product itself, maybe someone ran torrents. In Google's case they didn't even have the product whose features they were presenting
for me its not embarrassing part on steve jobs because its only a wifi.. majority of people "relate" with wifi issues so no harm done. Only media like to over hype things. But what happened to google presentation is really embarrassing since the presentation is the answer for the rising popularity of chat-gpt/microsoft. It is really.. really embarrasing..
How Google is handling this reminds me of how Microsoft handled the emergence of the ipod. They first brushed it off as a nothingburger before realising they were wrong and scrambled to get something out the door to compete, which of course was the Zune.
Seems this time, while Microsoft missed out on search engines, mp3 players and smartphones, only able to push out their own last minute cobbled together technology, this time they're making sure they're on the front lines with the AI boom while it's Google that's scrambling this time.
Dude! I remember comparing Zune to iPod back in the day. It was meh to me. So I spend my money on videogames instead, and I'm glad I did.
@@Mhdalzein i see you're civilised
Except that Google hasn't brushed off ChatGPT
This channel never misses a beat. The substance always grabs and holds me more than any clickbait title could. I legit get excited whenever I see a new video and this has been the case since the start in 2016 when I subbed.
I'm new to stock market /Crypto and would like to invest but I've go no idea on how to make good profits. Pls what's the best approach you'd recommend?
I'm 37 and have been looking for ways to be successful, please how??
Really good video of whats been happening. What's more interesting is also a lot of small companies, new start ups, that are taking small parts or even entire share markets, or new markets, with ai animation, music, or image generation. They are the ones who pioneer this tech, since they are the ones who are less afraid of consequences.
Google shot themselves in the foot in that whever you search something on mobile, half of the first search results are ads and the real thing you want is almost at the bottom.
I agree, it’s been getting harder and harder to find anything via Google. It’s like they forgot what their product was meant to do
Also smart people automatically ignore ads.
Google finally being challenged will bring out the next best thing for us.
Next IO could be really exiting. I am sure with the recent live demo debacle, next ones will be perfect.
Defying a monopoly is always beneficial to consumers, otherwise they stop innovating and focus on profit margins. Doesn't matter who wins, all that matters is that they're trying.
I just love how Microsoft is kind of making themselves the superstar here. I have always been a Google fan, but this is good stuff.
Lol. You're going to eat those words sooner than later
@@virusfrmhell as in Google exiting the market? 😉
It's weird, we live in a world where society is rapidly declining yet technology is rapidly increasing. Because of this I have absolutely no idea what the future will be like
Good point
Might want to read neuromancer or Snow crash might give you an idea.
If I may offer a thought: The way to understand this apparent paradox is realizing how the market economy actually functions. Briefly: The efficiency and, ultimately, the viability of the market economy is directly based on 1) The highest possible turnover of _literally anything_ which people can be made to pay for, measured monetarily, and 2) The maximum employment of people in the workforce in order to distribute all the money to be circulated. These two things are definitively what _a society_ needs in order to function economically, under the theoretical logic of a market system.
However, from each _individual business'_ perspective, their incentive is simply to minimize their overall costs while maximizing their revenue; nothing else. This means that every labor saving piece of technology developed will _automatically_ be utilized by employers to minimize the need for human labor by whatever is made possible by that technology, as a direct requirement of good business management; If you don't do it, your competitor will. The only logical endgame in this competitive exploitation of technology is the ever-increasing minimizing of human labor roles.
This is why "labor saving" technology, on the whole, always makes it more difficult for people to find any steady forms of employment and, hence, makes it harder and harder for the economy to function on the macro/society level. At least this is evidently true in the era we are currently living in, where most of the work actually necessary for producing basic necessities can be done by computers and machines; and this economic self-destruction is *only ever going to accelerate,* because it is a _direct consequence_ of the market economy's very operational logic.
Elitist salesmen and media talking heads will never discuss this problem at all, but it is fairly simple to work it out if only you allow yourself to think outside of your prescribed box of 'growth' and 'innovation' and 'free-trade' and all the other nonsense they are always pretending will solve the world's economic predicament. They are actually making it much harder for you to understand than it should be. I think this is intentional but I guess you can make up your own mind.
basically a cyberpunk dystopia without the cool aesthetic
The word you're looking for is dark 🙃🙂🙃🙂
I came for the AI wars but stayed for a link to the outro song. That was fire
My only concern with A.I. is who controls it and what database it gets it’s information from. If someone can control the information the A.I. gives you then I could see bigger issues happening
multiple databases, controlled by algorithms.
@@jeevan88888 But who is watching the generator of said algorithms?
Which is why I think AI technology shouldn’t be used or followed up on. Too few benefits with too few good consequences compared to the many negatives it will have.
@@Lawnmower737 yes, make sure you never use it. While the rest of the world leaves you behind.
As if search engines aren't already biased on what they show you. Sure, they might show you every result, but what appears in the first page in the first result...
What Microsoft is doing with AI and Bing is nothing short of Magic. This is a game changer.
I remember how in the early '90sbecause I watched movies as a kid and expected Computers to work Exactly like this - you write and ask something and the computer replies with the response! Now 30 years later, it is a Reality! Movies and Books are Great Inspirations and Prophecies for the Future!
It really isn't.
@@corail53it is
@@corail53 I swear these are AI bot comments.
@@TelltaleBytes careful, they are gonna send terminators after you!
I've been complaining about google search these days, when you rephrase your search it keeps giving you the same results.
I’m curious to see how this affects advertising on the web. If users click less links and visit less websites, whole companies business models must change. I also think about how businesses can’t get away with deceptive advertising as much because of how savvy potential customers can get with A.I.
What the customer needs is Artificial Critical Thinking.
Funny thing, they don't even have to change monetization model for it. You have search result, you have chat-gpt summary, and you have old school context advertisement all at once 😆 Well played, Microsoft.
They can lock away features and upsell them to customers and pretty sure people would buy them if it made search queries easier. Like if it on the fly looked at all possible vendors for something applied any savings and auto filled all the billing information in a single click.
if ai uses content from the website - the website should be paid. At least bing leaves attribution link (while google doesnt) from where it got info, but still a website loses trafic this way = loses potential profits. And no profits mean zero motivation to create new content for websites.
Me intriga la parte legal o copyright? que pasara con ello?
@@macariosanchez5640 a lot of mess
Just wait until the ads are baked into the response. Then it will get interesting.
I find it amazing that Microsoft just outsourced and leveraged the startup's 'reputation risk' edge to their advantage !
People have underestimated Microsoft for decades... The brain trust over there is very good at what they do... Some companies are strong companies, like Disney... Even though we might disagree, or dislike them, they do have the ability to adapt as well as a track record of getting things right over time.
I love to read, take my own perceptions and then discuss with the people that share the interest around me. Good luck with use, abuse and be abused with this "im so modern things".
Thank you for your good work ColdFusion.
If Bing works the way it describes, I’m switching over-no question. This looks awesome.
Honestly, I want Google to fail harder than Stadia. I may not like Microsoft either and they're arguably even worse, but Google's slogan used to be "Don't Be Evil," and now look at em.
Elon should buy UA-cam, no more coverups
The original founders of Google left. What did you expect?
And this man is on utube a Google produce, good won't fail
@@justinojara9169 what choice is there with monopolies?
i dont like Microsoft too but i rather have Google fail
Microsoft already possesses one of the best voice assistants in my opinion. Nearly everyone dismissed Cortana as a useful assistant over 6 years ago and yet it was the most natural and responsive voice assistant next to googles and far better than Siri or Alexa. I can only imagine what they can do if they gave it a refresh an integrated it into chat GPT 16:42
It was found to be missing information always
Yeah I use Microsoft translate for listening to the ai voices in Catalan and Persian and Arabic it’s the best
Your videos are some of the best on UA-cam, thank you for sharing
I heard Google invited staffs to test Bard. Wondering how it will answer if they ask "Who is the next to get fired by Google?"
the one who lost the presentation phone!😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢could cost his/her life
I cackled.
@@bharadwajbhavanam9091
Google Ai hid the phone
It now has the comparison of Microsofts current AI and it can leap frog Microsoft Ai
The loser of the woke off?