these are stupidly good dude. you don't have much philosophical videos in your catalogue, i strongly suggest making more. you have a way of cutting thru the "obscuration fetish" these philosophers had without missing the essence. subbed
Another excellent lecture! Summarizing the later Heidegger is even more complex than tackling the comparably more “systematic” “Being and Time”, but you did a great job, especially in the section on the Contributions. Thanks for your work!!
Thank you! May i request an analysis of 'philosophical investigations' by Wittgenstein? Your video about the tractatus was amazing, and given your clarity of explaination it would be great!
This is a good content, congratulations! I don't agree with every interpretation but it's clear that you care about the subject. Just a zuggestion: you should improve you understanding of ancient Greek, otherwise it is not easy to really understand what Heidegger gest right and what he gets partially wrong.
Meaning is temporal and historical. Although still trying to be metaphysical by trying to find a ground (Kantian) - I guess iin being and time only? The first philosopher of finitude - how does being unfold historically
No more focus on phenomology but critique of history more typically. For me: What other things are there where people point to lists or x1 X2 etc like metaphysics? Philosophy gives people/things burden (a weight). From this greatness can arise Phusis - power/wield/holding sway. Not a thing, way comes to arise for Greeks. Emerging/unfolding/happening. The thing below process that allows it come about. Both Parmenides and Heraclitus is not opposed to 1) becoming 2) seeming 3) becoming 4) ought. Because of aletheia as truth below truth as correspondence. It's in things before propositions. A disclosure. An unfortgetting. Letting things being disclosed, which ironically allows to engage in being. Although can't take it up fully (something revealed and another disclosed). By ignoring seed and trees relation, can see it's differences as a thing (which allows it to be intelligible to us). Being and the nothing (relating to concealing linked to disclosure). Boundary of nihiliation is necessary for beings to be there. Dasein based on the nothing. Beings as phusis, swaying of phusis as see beings as they stand. All being is stepping out from concealment (concealment as necessary). 'aspect' dokei from doxa (opinion) - all being emerges from seeming. Greeks saw importance of seeming as leading to being holding sway. (Not about being as higher). All being takes takes place in seeming. all being emerges in background of nothing. Being as struggle between forces (which means he is similar to Heraclitus). All beings are drawn out of strife out of concealment (from nothing/is not). Humans only as Dasein through this. Before all categories. Being/not being - seeming out of this. Not exclusionary realms but always in relation. Phusis as representing in later times. Above them as subject. Related to thinking. Logic. Truth forgotten so truth as correspondence and then logic emerges. Propositions becomes locus for truth (but does not allow us to access being from this). Logos - constant gathering and holding it together (allows for intelligibility/coherence). Gathering not random but allows for order/meaning. But strife is included, tension. Phusis and logos are one. Not to do with human subject (only in having of apprehension does history emerge and then humans/gods). Humans as uncanny because cannot be present -at-hand. Breaks into the world. Does violence. Dasein has to cause rupture for its own world disclosure This can be forgotten though by going into ordinariness. (Dangerous thought). Dasein - it's own death, cannot overcome or struggle. Violence/strife (not actual war) done to enact the world. And logos gathers and therefore has to rank. Which has been lost (made into propositiona/rational) That was 3) thinking. Now 4) ought. Division between being and ought: Ethics is mired in metaphysical. Is it dangerous to remove from this. Ideas in plato as the good (ideas as values). Subject making value+judgements of the world. How do we look at world without values? (Heidegger doesn't explain). (Maybe ethics as conserving freedom so everyone can get in touch with phsus)
Art and poetry: Art revealing being. Art can reveal historical unfolding of being. Artworks are things. Thing - not nothing.1) any properties assembled (traditional conception). 2)Thing as unity of sensations (phenomological idea). Instead we don't abstract red from a flower. Show itself in own containment. 3)A thing is formed matter (present as hand criticism). 4) artwork capturing essence, a happening of truth. Struggled for. Truth as a primal struggle to create a world for them. Therefore historical. World in museum no longer world. World withdrawal, remember but never recover them. Earth - shelters that arises. People orient themselves around. Happening of truth (in a struggle). Let's the god be present rather than a representation. Set up world for people. Reminds them. Earth (spontaneous) rising up through the world (destiny). Strife - self-assertion into essential nature. World revealing shaping, earth Mysterious, concealing. Techne - art as knowhow. Not creating, but a mode of knowing. Let something emerge and come into presence. Creators also need preservers. It must find people to enact it. All things emerge in strigr of world and earth. Art draws up something primal and original. Beginning of history anew. What went before refuted. Modern era - aesthetics. Limited (to be contemplated with no interest). Different from ancient conception as bringing forth. Not to be about the beautiful. Beauty is aftervrffrctvof mystery of world and earths struggle. Aesthetics makes us passive, devalues art. How does earth rise up through world? The thingly element always shows up in art (as opposed to ready at hand). More than just beauty. Materiality of artwork is important. Earth as literal and metaphor too. But, gothic cathedral vertical projection ignores material. Ethereal. Heidegger - great work as communal. But what about private works? Van Gogh and Heidegger. Not a conservative classicist. World decay cannot be undone. Instead the greek temple is just an example of how to open up to art outside of aesthetics. Poetry: all art is poetry. Language is the house of being. Not about logic. Language is where earth and world can struggle. Strife of world and earth leads to things and language enact this. Allows it to stand on itself. Poets establish that which endures. A remembrance. Language as phusis, an unfolding of being. Modern needs holy and uniting, return of God. (Not Christian). Poets as wine gods, move quietly, act in secret for something greater. Trace out fugitive gods
technology and enframing: heidegger as a rustic although did use technology. technology - means to an end traditionally. cause that makes an effect. four cases (material, formal, final cause, efficient cause). cause - to fall original meaning, that which is indebted/responsible. forms of bringing forth. poesis (opening of buds, winds blowing, but also artist crafting something. poetry also bringing forth and make them into presence (fulfilment of phusis). a statesman can be techne as well. all forms of human 'making' is 'techne' and techne is related to episteme, a type of knowing as in we receive the revelation of truth, a kind of revealing. weathervane brings to presence as poesis and reveals nature. artificial radar reveals nature too and presence too but as a challenging-forth. an unreasonable demand. sets upon nature (resource - unlocking, transforming, storing, distributing). everything on standyby, to be ready for use in the unconcealment of technology. everything not seen as itself but as standing-reserve. the first crisis before the actual ecological crisis. Today - standing reserve has taken over every other way of seeing (poetic, mythical, natural, ethical) even humans. see patients as human supply lines. now its called human resources department. This suppression is called Gestell even now standing reserve has affected our views so much that travelling to destinations like mountain already has a hint of a potentiality as a standing reserve in the future, or just standing reserve for aesthetic appreciation (tourist industry). starts with scientific revolution - reduces everything to calculation. extension, number, mass and calculation. no more 4 causes (only efficient cause is remaining of calculation and ordering). Risk is we see ourselves as standing reserve (fifth science - AI turning on us). The rule of enframing doesn't allow us to see essence, lose original revealing, more primal truth. the crisis can make us aware of this enframing and help us to let loos of this, to return to primal truth. but it means actually looking at the technology as essence (i guess seeing it as craft? not just as something to use, something to be revealed like nature?). maybe help us to realise other non-techne modes of revealing.
Dwelling and the fourfold: post-metaphysics is needed. an alternative: more positive: man dwells in the earth. at home in the world. dwelling as focus, not time. on what do we dwell in this era (in standing reserve). the problem is that with tech everything can be made near (like youtube/tv) but the problem is that everything becomes equally near (nothing is specially in front). To resolve this, we need to let a thing thing, or a thing gathering (earth sky mortals divinities),. Dasein is mortals (death as making us mortal - authentic, doesn't happen alone now. primal oneness of the four. Babette's feast. Good job including the quotes! Allow the thing to fourfold. to free into its own essence rather than subjugate it. The farmhouse as well as fourfold (earth, sky, divinities (i guess here the coming together, the higher) and mortals (offering with land). We cannot actually predict this though, it is only through preparing the ground that we can wait for the 'turning' not knowing what this will look like.
Event and Appropriation: in the past all texts art occurred within poesis. (outside of enframing) neitzche as end of metaphysics. no more advances. (presocrates the start and neitzche end of the first beginning) now in techne. inevtiable fate of metaphysics to calculability. other beginning or techne doomed. being an beings now in a original unity. why? Not looking at being as transcendental, essential. angst coming about through withdrawal of being. unsetlted ground through this (being itself is unsettled). being holds sway as en-owning (ereigitis) what is this lol
@@nyx8017 thats right, i much prefer a video like this than have to watch 10 videos on the same topic not knowing if i am getting everything i need to know about it
@@igorcapelari well technically it's impossible to get 'everything' about a topic because you as the viewer can always come up with more interpretations, but videos like this are a good start.
these are stupidly good dude. you don't have much philosophical videos in your catalogue, i strongly suggest making more. you have a way of cutting thru the "obscuration fetish" these philosophers had without missing the essence. subbed
Put this way M. Heidegger is crystal clear understood, thank you.
Another excellent lecture! Summarizing the later Heidegger is even more complex than tackling the comparably more “systematic” “Being and Time”, but you did a great job, especially in the section on the Contributions. Thanks for your work!!
Thank you! May i request an analysis of 'philosophical investigations' by Wittgenstein? Your video about the tractatus was amazing, and given your clarity of explaination it would be great!
Philosophical Investigations would be lovely!
Please do later Wittgenstein
Thank you so much for making these videos. This helps so much with close reading and trying to understand philosophy. Much love
I hope you return with another great video, your essays on Heidegger were one of a kind!
pls come back bro we need you
This is a good content, congratulations! I don't agree with every interpretation but it's clear that you care about the subject. Just a zuggestion: you should improve you understanding of ancient Greek, otherwise it is not easy to really understand what Heidegger gest right and what he gets partially wrong.
THANK YOU SO MUCH
Bicycle is technology?
Could you make one on Hegel?
Meaning is temporal and historical. Although still trying to be metaphysical by trying to find a ground (Kantian) - I guess iin being and time only?
The first philosopher of finitude - how does being unfold historically
No more focus on phenomology but critique of history more typically.
For me: What other things are there where people point to lists or x1 X2 etc like metaphysics?
Philosophy gives people/things burden (a weight). From this greatness can arise
Phusis - power/wield/holding sway. Not a thing, way comes to arise for Greeks. Emerging/unfolding/happening. The thing below process that allows it come about.
Both Parmenides and Heraclitus is not opposed to 1) becoming 2) seeming 3) becoming 4) ought.
Because of aletheia as truth below truth as correspondence. It's in things before propositions. A disclosure. An unfortgetting. Letting things being disclosed, which ironically allows to engage in being. Although can't take it up fully (something revealed and another disclosed). By ignoring seed and trees relation, can see it's differences as a thing (which allows it to be intelligible to us).
Being and the nothing (relating to concealing linked to disclosure). Boundary of nihiliation is necessary for beings to be there. Dasein based on the nothing.
Beings as phusis, swaying of phusis as see beings as they stand. All being is stepping out from concealment (concealment as necessary).
'aspect' dokei from doxa (opinion) - all being emerges from seeming. Greeks saw importance of seeming as leading to being holding sway. (Not about being as higher). All being takes takes place in seeming. all being emerges in background of nothing. Being as struggle between forces (which means he is similar to Heraclitus).
All beings are drawn out of strife out of concealment (from nothing/is not). Humans only as Dasein through this. Before all categories.
Being/not being - seeming out of this. Not exclusionary realms but always in relation.
Phusis as representing in later times. Above them as subject. Related to thinking. Logic. Truth forgotten so truth as correspondence and then logic emerges. Propositions becomes locus for truth (but does not allow us to access being from this).
Logos - constant gathering and holding it together (allows for intelligibility/coherence). Gathering not random but allows for order/meaning. But strife is included, tension.
Phusis and logos are one. Not to do with human subject (only in having of apprehension does history emerge and then humans/gods).
Humans as uncanny because cannot be present -at-hand. Breaks into the world. Does violence. Dasein has to cause rupture for its own world disclosure
This can be forgotten though by going into ordinariness. (Dangerous thought).
Dasein - it's own death, cannot overcome or struggle. Violence/strife (not actual war) done to enact the world.
And logos gathers and therefore has to rank. Which has been lost (made into propositiona/rational)
That was 3) thinking.
Now 4) ought.
Division between being and ought:
Ethics is mired in metaphysical. Is it dangerous to remove from this.
Ideas in plato as the good (ideas as values). Subject making value+judgements of the world. How do we look at world without values? (Heidegger doesn't explain). (Maybe ethics as conserving freedom so everyone can get in touch with phsus)
Art and poetry:
Art revealing being.
Art can reveal historical unfolding of being.
Artworks are things.
Thing - not nothing.1) any properties assembled (traditional conception). 2)Thing as unity of sensations (phenomological idea).
Instead we don't abstract red from a flower. Show itself in own containment. 3)A thing is formed matter (present as hand criticism).
4) artwork capturing essence, a happening of truth. Struggled for. Truth as a primal struggle to create a world for them. Therefore historical. World in museum no longer world. World withdrawal, remember but never recover them.
Earth - shelters that arises. People orient themselves around. Happening of truth (in a struggle). Let's the god be present rather than a representation. Set up world for people. Reminds them. Earth (spontaneous) rising up through the world (destiny). Strife - self-assertion into essential nature. World revealing shaping, earth Mysterious, concealing.
Techne - art as knowhow. Not creating, but a mode of knowing. Let something emerge and come into presence.
Creators also need preservers. It must find people to enact it.
All things emerge in strigr of world and earth. Art draws up something primal and original. Beginning of history anew. What went before refuted.
Modern era - aesthetics. Limited (to be contemplated with no interest). Different from ancient conception as bringing forth. Not to be about the beautiful.
Beauty is aftervrffrctvof mystery of world and earths struggle. Aesthetics makes us passive, devalues art.
How does earth rise up through world? The thingly element always shows up in art (as opposed to ready at hand). More than just beauty. Materiality of artwork is important. Earth as literal and metaphor too.
But, gothic cathedral vertical projection ignores material. Ethereal.
Heidegger - great work as communal. But what about private works? Van Gogh and Heidegger. Not a conservative classicist. World decay cannot be undone. Instead the greek temple is just an example of how to open up to art outside of aesthetics.
Poetry: all art is poetry. Language is the house of being. Not about logic. Language is where earth and world can struggle. Strife of world and earth leads to things and language enact this. Allows it to stand on itself.
Poets establish that which endures. A remembrance. Language as phusis, an unfolding of being.
Modern needs holy and uniting, return of God. (Not Christian).
Poets as wine gods, move quietly, act in secret for something greater. Trace out fugitive gods
technology and enframing:
heidegger as a rustic although did use technology.
technology - means to an end traditionally. cause that makes an effect. four cases (material, formal, final cause, efficient cause).
cause - to fall original meaning, that which is indebted/responsible. forms of bringing forth. poesis (opening of buds, winds blowing, but also artist crafting something. poetry also bringing forth and make them into presence (fulfilment of phusis). a statesman can be techne as well. all forms of human 'making' is 'techne' and techne is related to episteme, a type of knowing as in we receive the revelation of truth, a kind of revealing.
weathervane brings to presence as poesis and reveals nature.
artificial radar reveals nature too and presence too but as a challenging-forth. an unreasonable demand. sets upon nature (resource - unlocking, transforming, storing, distributing). everything on standyby, to be ready for use in the unconcealment of technology. everything not seen as itself but as standing-reserve. the first crisis before the actual ecological crisis.
Today - standing reserve has taken over every other way of seeing (poetic, mythical, natural, ethical) even humans. see patients as human supply lines. now its called human resources department. This suppression is called Gestell
even now standing reserve has affected our views so much that travelling to destinations like mountain already has a hint of a potentiality as a standing reserve in the future, or just standing reserve for aesthetic appreciation (tourist industry).
starts with scientific revolution - reduces everything to calculation. extension, number, mass and calculation. no more 4 causes (only efficient cause is remaining of calculation and ordering).
Risk is we see ourselves as standing reserve (fifth science - AI turning on us).
The rule of enframing doesn't allow us to see essence, lose original revealing, more primal truth.
the crisis can make us aware of this enframing and help us to let loos of this, to return to primal truth. but it means actually looking at the technology as essence (i guess seeing it as craft? not just as something to use, something to be revealed like nature?). maybe help us to realise other non-techne modes of revealing.
Dwelling and the fourfold:
post-metaphysics is needed.
an alternative: more positive: man dwells in the earth. at home in the world. dwelling as focus, not time. on what do we dwell in this era (in standing reserve). the problem is that with tech everything can be made near (like youtube/tv) but the problem is that everything becomes equally near (nothing is specially in front). To resolve this, we need to let a thing thing, or a thing gathering (earth sky mortals divinities),. Dasein is mortals (death as making us mortal - authentic, doesn't happen alone now.
primal oneness of the four.
Babette's feast. Good job including the quotes! Allow the thing to fourfold. to free into its own essence rather than subjugate it.
The farmhouse as well as fourfold (earth, sky, divinities (i guess here the coming together, the higher) and mortals (offering with land). We cannot actually predict this though, it is only through preparing the ground that we can wait for the 'turning' not knowing what this will look like.
Event and Appropriation:
in the past all texts art occurred within poesis. (outside of enframing)
neitzche as end of metaphysics. no more advances. (presocrates the start and neitzche end of the first beginning)
now in techne. inevtiable fate of metaphysics to calculability.
other beginning or techne doomed.
being an beings now in a original unity. why?
Not looking at being as transcendental, essential.
angst coming about through withdrawal of being. unsetlted ground through this (being itself is unsettled).
being holds sway as en-owning (ereigitis)
what is this lol
Yer a legend 🙌
Why do you always delay in making stuff man. It always ends up being so good(this channel is a classic for mentioning subahibi in a tractatus vid)
Only bullshit algomaxxers churn out videos with no delay. Quality takes time.
@@nyx8017 thats right, i much prefer a video like this than have to watch 10 videos on the same topic not knowing if i am getting everything i need to know about it
@@igorcapelari well technically it's impossible to get 'everything' about a topic because you as the viewer can always come up with more interpretations, but videos like this are a good start.
Lopez Barbara Lee Amy Jackson Robert
Heidegger- total BS. What garbage!