At first I thought this video was going to make fun of the ridiculous laws that actually are in the books, such as unmarried pregnant women are not allowed to parachute on Sundays in Florida.
@@clearcontentment3695 A test every year, which determines based on average global values how many Xx_ _xX symbols you are allowed to unironically use, to prevent people holding back.
With the X% power ones I'm just imagining lawsuits based on whether the gum was thrown at over 50% power and at the trial the assailant would testify their innocence by throwing gum twice as hard
judge: mr james you may now throw the gum at this speedometer then their lawyer goes as you see the gum have traveled 1.2 seconds in the cctv footage while in our demonstration its only travelled at .5 seconds meaning my client did throw the gum at 50% power, i rest my case your honor
@@theeinertia4106 you typed that wrong he threw the gum twice as hard in the footage as in the courtroom so that means he somehow threw the gum at 200% power which honestly might work depending on the exact wording of the law.
New Law: anyone who brings their babies to a movie theater knowing damn well that they can start crying at any moment should be blacklisted from all movie theaters across the globe.
Seriously though, I'm always like "Hire a goddamned babysitter or get someone to babysit. Otherwise, stay the f home and realize that parenting comes with responsibilities and sacrifices so that your child doesn't have to become other people's problem."
They should not be allowed to have unprotected sex again and must submit themselves to mandatory pregnancy tests If in an airplane they give up the right to appeal
Personally, I'm against throwing your drink in the faces of those who talk near you in the movie theater, strictly because it's very likely to be a soft drink in a paper or thin plastic cup, meaning that those in the immediate vicinity will become hit by the splash radius of the drink in question.
No, this is no small price. The theater worker, one paid so little yet relied on so much.... They will have to clean this sticky mess. The person deserves a slap across the face, whilst holding a milk dud
What kind of Neanderthal throws a full cup in someone’s face. You have to open the lid, throw the drink in their face, then throw the lid and cup in their face afterwards. It’s like Oreos, you uncultured heathens
@@alakani so you are the kind of person that disassembles Oreos. SHAME. I eat mine by holding them under the surface of the milk until the bubbles stop then eat them whole.
2 points worth consideration in regards to the “check out” bill: 1.What if they get their coupon(s) ready before it’s their turn in line so it doesn’t actually take extra time at checkout? (As most coupons only need to have a barcode scanned)I believe that under that circumstance an amendment should be added exempting/reducing the extent of punishment, as they are clearly being mindful of those around them as opposed to just assuming that everyone has all the time in the world. 2. In the event that it is found that an individual has approached the counter with the intent to use a coupon and said coupon is expired and the individual in question persist to use it anyway you are aloud to beat them from behind with the nearest liftable heavy object, but you only receive one swing. However if you wait for them to devolve into a full on Richard/Karen* you receive an additional swing for every 15 seconds that you endure of pigheaded idiocy. Of course, the store will be responsible for hiring staff with the responsibility of removing unconscious or seriously injured individuals that have been made subject to this law.(maybe the greeters at Walmart will finally have a real job there?)
@@hiimcrazyfordrwho yes, but if someone isn’t new to shoplifting they are nothing. (I know this from overhearing/seeing things back when I was in school, not from personal experience.) So in the face of any real chance of theft they’re pretty useless, they really just get paid to stand there. To me, that doesn’t seem like having purpose at work. I guess they prevent NEW thieves from popping up, but so do the scanners people walk through at the door.(and any time I’ve been in a Walmart the greeters seem to be on they’re phones/half asleep, but that might just be the ones in my area? Are they more active where you are?) Anyways, you’re not wrong, but these are my personal feelings.(for real though, ARE they better where you are??)
@@hiimcrazyfordrwho ok, fair. But are the ones you’ve seen mentally alert and actively checking receipts and such?(because that is most certainly not the case here in my area. Also they all seem to be elderly for some reason? I don’t know why that’s the case, but it is.)
Throwing with 60% power, what does that mean? Wouldn't it be better to use joule as is common for things that are shot with? Either that or measure it in microsnickers, though that might get confusing.
I actually feel that since we're talking about impacts momentum may be a better measure, also, it's easier to aquire the data for momentum rather than energy so it'll be less taxing on stores in terms of adapting to the new direcrives
This video deserves a sequel where Zach collaborates with Ryan George in a mix of Zach and Ryan's styles that operates similarly to this one but actually addresses real laws actually in the books that are bonkers (e.g. unmarried pregnant women are not allowed to parachute on Sundays in Florida).
I feel like if not all, a lot of non American people want to hear the origin story for that one. Because, why on Sundays precisely? It's as dangerous for both the woman and the fœtus as any other day, isn't it? And why only the unmarried ones?
A few notes: For the first law, give them an additional former yugoslav republic of macedonia or two to account for disabled people as well. Also, you might want to reduce the speed limit of hitting the pedestrian to about 10-15 mph. 20 mph gives a 15% chance of the pedestrian dying, and 25 mph gives over 20% for death. That seems excessive for only 5 former yugoslav republic of macedonias. For the second law, there needs to be some major changes. Instead of being per coupon used, have it be a time limit as well. This way if someone uses relatively few coupons (either because they need to save on cash or because they're from a lower income area, neither of which should be punished), they won't get harassed by the other shoppers. HOWEVER, if you're a serial coupon collector and hold up the line for like 10 minutes, you deserve to get the entire bunch of candy by the checkout dumped on you (INCLUDING the full-size butter fingers) For the third law, maybe no brass knuckles. Rings? Yeah, those should be allowed. Brass Knuckles, however, are capable of some SERIOUS damage. It might be a tad overkill for someone talking during a Marvel Movie. However, it can be allowed for the secondary clause of that person sitting DIRECTLY in front of you when basically no one else is in the movie theater.
I would recommend having a guideline that says you have to drive as close as reasonably possible to the offending slow walker before starting to count. This both serves to limit the speed achievable before impact, while also preventing potential attempts at using this law to hit people very much not in the way. Like someone walking across the road far enough ahead that even though they do take longer than 6 mississippis, they won't actually interfere with the driver. Then the 25 mph might seem redundant, but its actual function becomes to set a limit for how much one can boost the acceleration of the car for scenarios like this. I do think with this change in perspective we should also rethink the limit itself, since it is not adjusted with this in mind. It might work as a temporary measure, but we should be prepared to lower it to a more reasonable limit when data about how the law impacts slow walkers has started to come in.
New law: When walking outside if someone passes by and stares at you the entire time then you are allowed to tell them a GTA insult that the main character says while showing them a middle finger with no consequences.
@@zan1971 What is classified as a meal that can be bought with vouchers? Is this determined by the overall value of the meal, or by the meal’s contents?
@@ge789 well things like soup could be considered a meal, but it has to be a bowl, and it must be a heavier soup. Seinfeld already has litigation regarding the law of meals
Anyone who waits till they get to the front of the line at a fast food restaurant to look at the menu must immediately must get sent to the back of the line and if they refuse you are legally allowed to physically move them against their will to the back of the line. Also if they are larger then you or you are incapable to do so, the rest of the line must pitch in to amend this wrong.
I like the principle behind this proposal, but I would like to offer a proposal to amend your proposal. If the person waits until they get to the front before choosing, the person serving them will be instructed to purposefully hold their order until everyone else who was currently behind them in line at the moment the offense occurred has each received their orders first. Let the holder-upper sit with their hunger as their lesson. (Otherwise, justice being served depends on the strength levels of other person's involved, but the offending person cannot stop their own hunger).
The problem with this is that for those with vision related issues, the tiny screens that restaurants use for displaying their menus make it near impossible to 1) know what is on the menu, and 2) decide on what to order, untill they are able to reach the front of the line.
@@invalidopinion1016 That's where menus come in. Fast food places should have menus available so that you dont need to come to the front counter to see what options are available. That way, once a person comes into the main line, it can be reasonably expected that they are there to place an order because they have already decided what they want.
The fact he said Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia 5 times in a row instead of North Macedonia has made him a national hero in the country (I wish I was joking). Prepare to have a national holiday named in your honor
I am shocked that the actual word Macedonia was mentioned and that there isn't Greeks or Bulgarians writing essays in the chat on how Macedonia is 3000 years greek/Bulgarian history Well I was amazed until I recalled that this guy is actually smart and posts science and maths videos and Greeks and Bulgarians are immune to facts
@@AleksPTAthat's rich having in mind that "macedonians" are Slavs who are brainwashed to believe they originate from Alexander the Great. I'm Serbian so I know real facts. What you call "Macedonia" was part of Serbia. So you guys are half Serbs and half Bulgarians that think they're ancient Greeks 😅
For the last one i propose that -you can choose where ever you want to move to sit in the theater (as to not promote violence first, since there are also empty seats since there are two of you) -if the person still talks too much that it disturbs you even though you have moved then this matter shall be judged by a medieval style trial by combat, the winner shall be the righteous one and can throw the unfortunate one's popcorn at them at precisely 23 mph, any throwing speed exceeding or below will result in a second trial by combat, of which the winner shall throw the unfortunate one's popcorn again, but this time speed limit is neglected, except the unfortunate one's shall buy a new popcorn for the winner, while being forced to leave the movie theater.
I'll agree with your first proposal, but only if the theater is located in a 'duty to retreat' state. If the theater is located in one of the 38 states with a 'stand your ground' (a.k.a. no duty to retreat) law, then you will not be required to move to a different seat first. As for your second proposal, if we're dealing with medieval style trial by combat, then I propose that any reference to speed must be stated as a percentage of the airspeed velocity of an unladen swallow.
I'm sorry, but some of us choose seats based on their perceived optimal screen viewing location within a theater. Why should I have to give up the optimal seat for someone else's inconsideration?
But then you would not have watched a consequent part of the movie. I would instead suggest being allowed to neutralise the personn in question either by physical hit or suffocation, but only in a perfect ninja tae kwon do technic. If you don't have knowledge of the aforementioned martial art, you then can only procede with bare hand choking, but without excessing 7.3kg force power into the person's neck.
I propose the trial by combat as the only solution, without popcorn, but the winner Will be rewarded with the possibility to choose a new seat for the loser. Obviously, for the time of the duel, the movie Will be paused, and the rest of the people in the audience Will be allowed to choose the weapons used during the fight
I propose that we allow retail, restaurant or other similar types of workers to pepper spray one costumer a year without consequences. I am dead serious this should be a thing.
There is a law that you can't have ice cream in your back pocket in one of the states. I forget which one, but it had something to do with people using it to lure and steal horses. So the most unrealistic part of this video isn't the content of the laws, but rather that it took a single stamp to get them passed.
They gave Horses ice cream and they turned into Unicorns, that's why they have the horn on their head, it's really the ice cream cone stuck to their head.
It's Kentucky, and specifically the city of Louisville. It was because of sheep, and the reason is that the sheep would follow you, and you could claim to not have stolen them, simply taking one with no-one claiming it.
I propose that for every screaming kid in a theater, you are allowed one life scarring insult per kid, per 2 screams. And if the parental figure that is with them complains, you get to dump a slushie on them. If you do not have a slushie, one will be provided for you and in the absence of a parental figure…. one will be provided for you.
I think these are just conversations that he has with himself due to is strange split personality disorder and he just posted them onto UA-cam as a desperate cry for help but they're just so funny we think he's acting
You forgot the laws for the people that are kicking your chair throughout the journey or movie in a bus, plane or a movie. I propose being assigned a special unit which would locate the culprit's living spaces and kick them to the brink of death. If you ask them to stop more than 3x times during the incident you are allowed to shoot them on the stop with no further legal actions taken against you as a consequence
The check and coupon thing is even worse for the cashier, who almost always has to relearn how to process a check, and/or ask for assistance from the shift lead.
I worked as a Walmart Cashier for 4 years and, idk, I didn't have any issues with checks. But maybe they've gotten pickier about how they're processed in the last 5 years, idk. Edit: No issues with *processing* checks, I mean. I do think they're outdated and a waste of time since the customer has to sit there and write it out at the front of the line, as opposed to just pulling out cash (which is also outdated) or using a card.
Coupons are fine to me personally since saving money is valid, *if* they prepared them ahead of time instead of waiting til the end. Check can go screw off though
I can’t even process how incredibly creative you have to be to come up with new sketches every single day without loosing any quality. It’s mindblowing! Keep up the good work, but take a break as soon as you need it, everyone would understand that. I hope you will never loose fun making your videos, you make me laugh every day since it discovered you. Thanks a lot for that and have a merry Christmas!
If a couple is walking down the sidewalk very slowly while holding hands and they don't give you enough space to walk around then you are allowed to shove your way passed and crop dust them.
Man I wish our House of Representatives could actually represent us this well and the senators who are supposed to represent state interests actually represented the interests of the people of the state, because these laws would unquestionably be popular and teach people to STOP BEING DUMB!!!
I have a feeling that last one was directed specifically at someone talking at a premiere screening of No Way Home that Zach was at. Can't be a coincidence lol
I feel the movie needs another clause. I call it the Baby clause: If a baby is brought in the movie theater, the movie may be paused and the adult curbstomped by the 4 nearest people. All others may give the milk dud punch. The baby will be dropped kicked by the first person to inflict the baby clause.
Well,it’s not the baby’s fault. I suggest the baby is simply taken away or that all movie theatres must have a daycare to put babies. However,in the event of a young child being a piece of shit,they may be dropkicked
One Mamungkukumpurangkuntjunya Hill or maybe 2 to account for old people should suffice, nobody would be offended by it since nobody knows where it's from
I propose an extra clause with the coupon law, that if you're using coupons but manage to catch the candy with your teeth in midair, you're allowed to keep it for free. This would appease both those using coupons and those throwing, as the ones who use coupons can at least have a chance at getting free snacks so they're less likely to complain.
Riding on a high of your videos lately. Love them. Sad to see the 25 days are about to be over. Hopefully you'll upload regularly even after the 25 days are over.
(Drops folder on the table) I call be BS on not using Mississippi for it is darn near the perfect timing of a second, other than that I am all for everything else...aslo...can I line Milk duds in my knuckles and still clock them across the jaw?
That first law is the exact reason I move quickly when walking in a parking lot, or signal a car through unless they've given me right of way. This kind of reminds me of "If Being Annoying was a Job" by Ryan George.
New law: if someone brings a baby to a theater the parent/parents will automatically be banned from the concession stands for one viewing. If the baby cries or makes a noise people can and are encouraged to bully the parents into leaving by, putting gum in their hair, insults (mainly about who brings a baby to a movie), and throwing snacks or drinks at them.
I would like to point out for the slow people walking law that disabled and, as they mentioned, old people exist, some of which simply cannot go that fast, and also do not deserve to be killed for it. :) And before anyone says that if you can tell they're disabled, something else applies, I would like to add that people with invisible disabilities exist. P.S. People who have hurt anything that's needed for walking and have to slow because of it would also fall in this group. Yes, I understand it's a sketch for fun, it's just rubbing me the wrong way and I felt the need to mention it for...reasons?
Cashiers everywhere now upset by needing to clean up soda spills everytime someone has coupons. The law should make the coupon user liable for any mess made as a consequence of their actions.
The candy bar and soda options really leave out consideration for the minimum wage employees who have to clean them up, for which I propose an entirely different law discussion on what is legal for employees to do when customers are shitty
Coupons should be fine if the store scans them, and they don't argue if the coupon isn't applicable if they get a wrong item or if it is expired. If they argue then the applied rules are valid.
The first law, is the one the I see the most, for sure. We should, at the very least, make it socially acceptable to honk at a person making a long ass diagonally beeline for their vehicle.
My mother paid with coupons one time. This was about 8 months ago, both her and my father had gotten laid off because of covid so money got tight fast, and she was doing her damn best to feed us. The people behind us got so annoyed that my mother was almost in tears, because they were berating her, it took me telling them all to shut the fuck up, and then the cashier to tell them all off because clearly money was an issue for us, before they all just shut up finally. Leave people who pay with coupons alone you prick's.
New law: if someone says “You Too” in an inappropriate scenario, you are legally allowed to take half of the sold products for yourself. Alternatively you can smack them across the jaw with a Whiffleball bat. If you do not have one, one will be provided for you
😂😂The New Marvel Movie had me. Was watching No Way Home yesterday and a group of people got in late talking and took a while to sit down. My exact feelings 😂I was like. Who has a cinema themes snack I can use to punch these guys
If the lights are off and the theatre is semi full, just tell it to sit down and shut the f up, works every time, well it does in Aus cause we don't have American gun laws
New Law: If you work as a cashier or restaurant servant and the customer is being annoying (still defying what annoying exactly means), you can throw whatever is in your hand right now or at your very near vicinity at them at any speed (because facing off against an entitled b!tch is very annoying and nobody should experience it) and if they keep annoying you you may use any drastical measure against them, which includes killing them with no consequences.
As a fastfood worker, may I also suggest that if a customer orders a very overcomplicated or annoying meal (I'm looking at you no-salt fries and chicken strips with a dozen extra strips) they may be punished by pouring coke on their heads, if continued, the employee may take them to the kitchen and dip their head in the fryer, same goes for massive groups with weird orders
In regards to the candy bar one, I want to make one addendum: if it turns out that they are allergic to nuts, which are included in the candy bar you just threw at them, you can wait five Conneticuts before giving them the epi-pen.
I would propose an amendment to the checkout law. If the customer has the coupons ready, and is only using a couple of them, I believe they should be given an exemption as they are clearly trying not to take up everyone's time, they just want to save a little money. I believe the law should be used to punish those who would abuse coupons, not those who use them responsibly.
New law proposal. When you're driving on the highway and two trucks block both lanes you're allowed to slam your car into their rear (not recommended) Second, when two or three people walk together on the sidewalk you're allowed to push through them and say: "exSQUEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEZE me" in a super high pitched voice
New Law: If a fast food employee gets your food wrong you should be allowed to throw one of the many open water bottles left sitting in your car at them ONLY if the bottle is half full. Full bottles may be thrown if this is the second time this week it’s happened, and if it’s specifically a Taco Bell or a Dunkin Donuts you may throw a steaming hot thermos of Black Coffee at the window receptionist.
people that go below the speed limit for no apparent reason should have their licences taken away and when they get it back have to put a sticker on the back side of their car to shame them (open to possible suggestions for the sticker), and if caught again they should not get a permit ever again for any kind of vehicle.
As a law student, this will be an absolute nightmare of a legislation. How the fuck are you gonna estimate the % of power applied during the scene 😂😂😂😂 Me dying just thinking about the funny shit that'll take place in courts if these are actually applicable 😂😂😂😂😂
@@ArthKryst apology for not clarifying, a randomised double blind study to determine the actual maximum power. After that, simple math to determine if power used is compliant with intent of said law
@@AleksPTA but you'd need to be able to mathematically show that no other factor caused the power level to be at where it is vs where it should has actually beenm
As an Australian I thank you for the unit conversion. I also pitty the fact that you have to live in a country use measurements was created by a drunk mathematician rolling dice. (Yes I stole that from Reddit)
Another good law idea: If a given patent is deemed to be "necessary for the immediate public good", it should be bought by the government from the patent owners for a reasonable prices (i.e. covering the research costs) and made freely available. This would prevent problems like people and governments not being able to get enough covid vaccines or insulin for their people.
Now you’ve given a government monopoly on a product, this usually leads to shortages, as the government is very inefficient, it will also decrease development of news medicines as there is no competition.
@@nikolairostov3326 "this usually leads to shortages, as the government is very inefficient" Absolute bollocks. Gas and electricity were state monopolies until 2002 and 2007 here in Italy with no issues whatsoever. Also, the only post-war hydroelectric disaster in Italy was caused by a private company, just as the nationalization was happening. They killed 2000 people. The Morandi bridge collapse two years ago happened while on a private company's watch. The bridge was problematic, but while under government supervision it was properly monitored and repaired. The private sector evidently decided it was more _efficient_ to let it collapse and kill 43 people, than pay for the upkeep. Only Americans have this stupid notion that government entities must inherently be a thousand times worse than private ones. Also most of the technology we have today is a direct result of government funded research, and there are still many areas in which the private sector refuses to invest in any meaningful way. Private businesses are great at making incremental updates, but they don't usually like to pour billions into projects that may end up not producing anything of immediate value.
My new law is when someone listens to something out loud without using headphones/earbuds/whatever on the bus, it is permissible to throw their phone out the bus window or door.
If only laws were this thought out and fast in actual government
At first I thought this video was going to make fun of the ridiculous laws that actually are in the books, such as unmarried pregnant women are not allowed to parachute on Sundays in Florida.
But how much is %power
Oh, they are this thought out.
The thought goes back and forth for forever, but it technically goes the distance.
@@clearcontentment3695 A test every year, which determines based on average global values how many Xx_ _xX symbols you are allowed to unironically use, to prevent people holding back.
@@mattcoyle1620 Thats because God wants them to rest. Simple as.
With the X% power ones I'm just imagining lawsuits based on whether the gum was thrown at over 50% power and at the trial the assailant would testify their innocence by throwing gum twice as hard
judge: mr james you may now throw the gum at this speedometer
then their lawyer goes as you see the gum have traveled 1.2 seconds in the cctv footage while in our demonstration its only travelled at .5 seconds meaning my client did throw the gum at 50% power, i rest my case your honor
@@theeinertia4106 fitting username
@@theeinertia4106 you typed that wrong he threw the gum twice as hard in the footage as in the courtroom so that means he somehow threw the gum at 200% power which honestly might work depending on the exact wording of the law.
@@jakewiththecake2915 wtf is a 200%, then threw it at 25% power -_-
@@theeinertia4106 I read that so wrong I am sorry
As a european (UK excluded), translating mph to km/h was really helpful and I appreciate your open-mindedness.
Real original comment there lol
“I feel uncomfortable when we’re not focused on me”
@@jb76489 It's really sad when americans think that
Personally I’m just thankful he translated to Botswanas
I have seen so many US videos that my brain instantly calculates to metric, except for °F to °C
New Law: anyone who brings their babies to a movie theater knowing damn well that they can start crying at any moment should be blacklisted from all movie theaters across the globe.
Seriously though, I'm always like "Hire a goddamned babysitter or get someone to babysit. Otherwise, stay the f home and realize that parenting comes with responsibilities and sacrifices so that your child doesn't have to become other people's problem."
They should not be allowed to have unprotected sex again and must submit themselves to mandatory pregnancy tests
If in an airplane they give up the right to appeal
If I may add, the blacklisting will occur until the child is 5 years of age.
@@-0m3rcy0-8 they can always make more kids
@@renegade6578 then they can be blacklisted again, but to add; if they are black listed more then two times, the third becomes permanent
Personally, I'm against throwing your drink in the faces of those who talk near you in the movie theater, strictly because it's very likely to be a soft drink in a paper or thin plastic cup, meaning that those in the immediate vicinity will become hit by the splash radius of the drink in question.
A small price to pay for salvation.
No, this is no small price. The theater worker, one paid so little yet relied on so much.... They will have to clean this sticky mess.
The person deserves a slap across the face, whilst holding a milk dud
What kind of Neanderthal throws a full cup in someone’s face. You have to open the lid, throw the drink in their face, then throw the lid and cup in their face afterwards. It’s like Oreos, you uncultured heathens
@@alakani so you are the kind of person that disassembles Oreos. SHAME.
I eat mine by holding them under the surface of the milk until the bubbles stop then eat them whole.
@@10thletter40 No, I'm sure the theater worker will understand completely and come in for an assist with his milk dud loaded palm.
2 points worth consideration in regards to the “check out” bill:
1.What if they get their coupon(s) ready before it’s their turn in line so it doesn’t actually take extra time at checkout? (As most coupons only need to have a barcode scanned)I believe that under that circumstance an amendment should be added exempting/reducing the extent of punishment, as they are clearly being mindful of those around them as opposed to just assuming that everyone has all the time in the world.
2. In the event that it is found that an individual has approached the counter with the intent to use a coupon and said coupon is expired and the individual in question persist to use it anyway you are aloud to beat them from behind with the nearest liftable heavy object, but you only receive one swing. However if you wait for them to devolve into a full on Richard/Karen* you receive an additional swing for every 15 seconds that you endure of pigheaded idiocy. Of course, the store will be responsible for hiring staff with the responsibility of removing unconscious or seriously injured individuals that have been made subject to this law.(maybe the greeters at Walmart will finally have a real job there?)
Walmart (and other) greeters are theft deterrents
@@hiimcrazyfordrwho yes, but if someone isn’t new to shoplifting they are nothing. (I know this from overhearing/seeing things back when I was in school, not from personal experience.) So in the face of any real chance of theft they’re pretty useless, they really just get paid to stand there. To me, that doesn’t seem like having purpose at work. I guess they prevent NEW thieves from popping up, but so do the scanners people walk through at the door.(and any time I’ve been in a Walmart the greeters seem to be on they’re phones/half asleep, but that might just be the ones in my area? Are they more active where you are?) Anyways, you’re not wrong, but these are my personal feelings.(for real though, ARE they better where you are??)
@@abaldrabbit I've only seen greeters at Best Buy honestly. I don't think my local Walmart has them.
@@hiimcrazyfordrwho ok, fair. But are the ones you’ve seen mentally alert and actively checking receipts and such?(because that is most certainly not the case here in my area. Also they all seem to be elderly for some reason? I don’t know why that’s the case, but it is.)
LAW SECONDED
MOTION PASSES
PREPARE THE BEATINGS
Throwing with 60% power, what does that mean?
Wouldn't it be better to use joule as is common for things that are shot with?
Either that or measure it in microsnickers, though that might get confusing.
I mean, 60% from an Olympic shot put champion is a lot different from 60% from the person with a broken arm.
Woosh
I actually feel that since we're talking about impacts momentum may be a better measure, also, it's easier to aquire the data for momentum rather than energy so it'll be less taxing on stores in terms of adapting to the new direcrives
@@drkgaming7792 No, that's 80% power and beyond
@@drkgaming7792 yes, that's the sound my 1lb Reese's will make sailing through the air
This video deserves a sequel where Zach collaborates with Ryan George in a mix of Zach and Ryan's styles that operates similarly to this one but actually addresses real laws actually in the books that are bonkers (e.g. unmarried pregnant women are not allowed to parachute on Sundays in Florida).
Yes..this!
Watching Ryan George is Tight!
I feel like if not all, a lot of non American people want to hear the origin story for that one.
Because, why on Sundays precisely? It's as dangerous for both the woman and the fœtus as any other day, isn't it? And why only the unmarried ones?
@@clemente3966
Interested
@@AshenDemon I believe you meant “tight”
This series of events definitely happened to Zach recently
I guess you could call them An Unfortunate Series Of Events 😉
@@mkst177 whats ausoe
@@George-iz2ce a classic movie, look it.up
A few notes:
For the first law, give them an additional former yugoslav republic of macedonia or two to account for disabled people as well. Also, you might want to reduce the speed limit of hitting the pedestrian to about 10-15 mph. 20 mph gives a 15% chance of the pedestrian dying, and 25 mph gives over 20% for death. That seems excessive for only 5 former yugoslav republic of macedonias.
For the second law, there needs to be some major changes. Instead of being per coupon used, have it be a time limit as well. This way if someone uses relatively few coupons (either because they need to save on cash or because they're from a lower income area, neither of which should be punished), they won't get harassed by the other shoppers. HOWEVER, if you're a serial coupon collector and hold up the line for like 10 minutes, you deserve to get the entire bunch of candy by the checkout dumped on you (INCLUDING the full-size butter fingers)
For the third law, maybe no brass knuckles. Rings? Yeah, those should be allowed. Brass Knuckles, however, are capable of some SERIOUS damage. It might be a tad overkill for someone talking during a Marvel Movie. However, it can be allowed for the secondary clause of that person sitting DIRECTLY in front of you when basically no one else is in the movie theater.
I would recommend having a guideline that says you have to drive as close as reasonably possible to the offending slow walker before starting to count. This both serves to limit the speed achievable before impact, while also preventing potential attempts at using this law to hit people very much not in the way. Like someone walking across the road far enough ahead that even though they do take longer than 6 mississippis, they won't actually interfere with the driver. Then the 25 mph might seem redundant, but its actual function becomes to set a limit for how much one can boost the acceleration of the car for scenarios like this.
I do think with this change in perspective we should also rethink the limit itself, since it is not adjusted with this in mind. It might work as a temporary measure, but we should be prepared to lower it to a more reasonable limit when data about how the law impacts slow walkers has started to come in.
@@dig8634 A well thought-out contribution. I thank you, my friend, for the input. I had not considered that
I agree with everything but if it’s a marvel movie and you talk then take out your gun and use your amendments
@@ruhipatel6165 Thor dark world was not good enough to merit that
New law: When walking outside if someone passes by and stares at you the entire time then you are allowed to tell them a GTA insult that the main character says while showing them a middle finger with no consequences.
would staring at strangers be considered as an acceptable option to start a conversation and/or friendship then?
@@ssj9devil
Only if they offer you a gift voucher for a meal
@@zan1971 this is a reasonable demand
@@zan1971
What is classified as a meal that can be bought with vouchers? Is this determined by the overall value of the meal, or by the meal’s contents?
@@ge789 well things like soup could be considered a meal, but it has to be a bowl, and it must be a heavier soup.
Seinfeld already has litigation regarding the law of meals
Anyone who waits till they get to the front of the line at a fast food restaurant to look at the menu must immediately must get sent to the back of the line and if they refuse you are legally allowed to physically move them against their will to the back of the line.
Also if they are larger then you or you are incapable to do so, the rest of the line must pitch in to amend this wrong.
What if they are literally monkeys with alzheimers? Are they exceptional?
I like the principle behind this proposal, but I would like to offer a proposal to amend your proposal.
If the person waits until they get to the front before choosing, the person serving them will be instructed to purposefully hold their order until everyone else who was currently behind them in line at the moment the offense occurred has each received their orders first. Let the holder-upper sit with their hunger as their lesson.
(Otherwise, justice being served depends on the strength levels of other person's involved, but the offending person cannot stop their own hunger).
The problem with this is that for those with vision related issues, the tiny screens that restaurants use for displaying their menus make it near impossible to 1) know what is on the menu, and 2) decide on what to order, untill they are able to reach the front of the line.
@@invalidopinion1016
That's where menus come in. Fast food places should have menus available so that you dont need to come to the front counter to see what options are available. That way, once a person comes into the main line, it can be reasonably expected that they are there to place an order because they have already decided what they want.
@@johnwalker1058 please i need this haha
there should be a law against people who walk slowly and horizontally in a group blocking the path for everyone trying to walk behind them
YES PLEASE
The fact he said Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia 5 times in a row instead of North Macedonia has made him a national hero in the country (I wish I was joking). Prepare to have a national holiday named in your honor
I am shocked that the actual word Macedonia was mentioned and that there isn't Greeks or Bulgarians writing essays in the chat on how Macedonia is 3000 years greek/Bulgarian history
Well I was amazed until I recalled that this guy is actually smart and posts science and maths videos and Greeks and Bulgarians are immune to facts
@@AleksPTA I mean, noone would object to FYROM. Or did they?..
Law #1 just resulted in a LOT more people getting killed since the name change 🤣
@@AleksPTAthat's rich having in mind that "macedonians" are Slavs who are brainwashed to believe they originate from Alexander the Great. I'm Serbian so I know real facts. What you call "Macedonia" was part of Serbia. So you guys are half Serbs and half Bulgarians that think they're ancient Greeks 😅
For the last one i propose that
-you can choose where ever you want to move to sit in the theater (as to not promote violence first, since there are also empty seats since there are two of you)
-if the person still talks too much that it disturbs you even though you have moved then this matter shall be judged by a medieval style trial by combat, the winner shall be the righteous one and can throw the unfortunate one's popcorn at them at precisely 23 mph, any throwing speed exceeding or below will result in a second trial by combat, of which the winner shall throw the unfortunate one's popcorn again, but this time speed limit is neglected, except the unfortunate one's shall buy a new popcorn for the winner, while being forced to leave the movie theater.
I'll agree with your first proposal, but only if the theater is located in a 'duty to retreat' state. If the theater is located in one of the 38 states with a 'stand your ground' (a.k.a. no duty to retreat) law, then you will not be required to move to a different seat first.
As for your second proposal, if we're dealing with medieval style trial by combat, then I propose that any reference to speed must be stated as a percentage of the airspeed velocity of an unladen swallow.
I'm sorry, but some of us choose seats based on their perceived optimal screen viewing location within a theater. Why should I have to give up the optimal seat for someone else's inconsideration?
Aye!
But then you would not have watched a consequent part of the movie. I would instead suggest being allowed to neutralise the personn in question either by physical hit or suffocation, but only in a perfect ninja tae kwon do technic. If you don't have knowledge of the aforementioned martial art, you then can only procede with bare hand choking, but without excessing 7.3kg force power into the person's neck.
I propose the trial by combat as the only solution, without popcorn, but the winner Will be rewarded with the possibility to choose a new seat for the loser. Obviously, for the time of the duel, the movie Will be paused, and the rest of the people in the audience Will be allowed to choose the weapons used during the fight
Gov needs him
I propose that we allow retail, restaurant or other similar types of workers to pepper spray one costumer a year without consequences. I am dead serious this should be a thing.
I work retail and people in no hurry always ask where something is right when they walk in or when it’s ironically right behind us
There is a law that you can't have ice cream in your back pocket in one of the states. I forget which one, but it had something to do with people using it to lure and steal horses.
So the most unrealistic part of this video isn't the content of the laws, but rather that it took a single stamp to get them passed.
They gave Horses ice cream and they turned into Unicorns, that's why they have the horn on their head, it's really the ice cream cone stuck to their head.
I believe that is Kentucky.
It's Kentucky, and specifically the city of Louisville. It was because of sheep, and the reason is that the sheep would follow you, and you could claim to not have stolen them, simply taking one with no-one claiming it.
That’s the funniest law I ever heard😂😂
I propose that for every screaming kid in a theater, you are allowed one life scarring insult per kid, per 2 screams. And if the parental figure that is with them complains, you get to dump a slushie on them. If you do not have a slushie, one will be provided for you and in the absence of a parental figure…. one will be provided for you.
yes i agree
Seriously how can you upload daily and still have this high quality? I'm impressed!
I think these are just conversations that he has with himself due to is strange split personality disorder and he just posted them onto UA-cam as a desperate cry for help but they're just so funny we think he's acting
spent all year prepping for that december cpm
@@dominicjuckes3988 relatable
@@dominicjuckes3988 agreed
I’ve been involved in the drafting of actual laws and this is remarkably spot on, except for the speed, it takes MUCH more discussion.
I am in favor of the death sentence for political corruption. 😅
But then we wouldn't have any political figures left
@@SSirloiNN But we would loose much more populists than honest ones.
@@keksesser0767 Except the Corrupt politicians would just execute their opposition for "corruption"
@@SSirloiNN I mean, the horror?
@@SSirloiNN oh no, how horrible! Anyways...
You forgot the laws for the people that are kicking your chair throughout the journey or movie in a bus, plane or a movie.
I propose being assigned a special unit which would locate the culprit's living spaces and kick them to the brink of death. If you ask them to stop more than 3x times during the incident you are allowed to shoot them on the stop with no further legal actions taken against you as a consequence
The check and coupon thing is even worse for the cashier, who almost always has to relearn how to process a check, and/or ask for assistance from the shift lead.
Majority of the time the check itself doesn't work. Why tf do ppl shop with checks anyway
If I’m asked to do the 15 point check and copy their license number again I’m quitting
I worked as a Walmart Cashier for 4 years and, idk, I didn't have any issues with checks. But maybe they've gotten pickier about how they're processed in the last 5 years, idk.
Edit: No issues with *processing* checks, I mean. I do think they're outdated and a waste of time since the customer has to sit there and write it out at the front of the line, as opposed to just pulling out cash (which is also outdated) or using a card.
Coupons are fine to me personally since saving money is valid, *if* they prepared them ahead of time instead of waiting til the end.
Check can go screw off though
As a law student I often think some laws are written like this.
I can't wait for these laws to be acted out in the Zack Star Himself Cinematic Universe.
I can’t even process how incredibly creative you have to be to come up with new sketches every single day without loosing any quality. It’s mindblowing! Keep up the good work, but take a break as soon as you need it, everyone would understand that. I hope you will never loose fun making your videos, you make me laugh every day since it discovered you. Thanks a lot for that and have a merry Christmas!
If a couple is walking down the sidewalk very slowly while holding hands and they don't give you enough space to walk around then you are allowed to shove your way passed and crop dust them.
Man I wish our House of Representatives could actually represent us this well and the senators who are supposed to represent state interests actually represented the interests of the people of the state, because these laws would unquestionably be popular and teach people to STOP BEING DUMB!!!
I have a feeling that last one was directed specifically at someone talking at a premiere screening of No Way Home that Zach was at. Can't be a coincidence lol
I feel the movie needs another clause. I call it the Baby clause:
If a baby is brought in the movie theater, the movie may be paused and the adult curbstomped by the 4 nearest people. All others may give the milk dud punch. The baby will be dropped kicked by the first person to inflict the baby clause.
Well,it’s not the baby’s fault. I suggest the baby is simply taken away or that all movie theatres must have a daycare to put babies. However,in the event of a young child being a piece of shit,they may be dropkicked
@@birdmcturd1626 This seems fair, Approved.
@@Charlie-jf1me Nice
And so it becomes law.
I propose that Zach is to write all new laws from here on out, both state and federal.
Movie theater theme punch 😂😂😂 holy fuck that made my Christmas morning so much better
I wish real politics was anywhere near this reasonable.
We need part 2-10 of this series ASAP!
One Mamungkukumpurangkuntjunya Hill or maybe 2 to account for old people should suffice, nobody would be offended by it since nobody knows where it's from
them deciding which kinds of movies you were allowed to punch someone with brass knuckles with warmed my heart, especially the marvel one
I love your videos dude, looking forward to your videos each and every day. Keep up the good work
I propose that a fistful of popcorn be a viable replacement for the milkdud. I think the crunching sound might add to the effect.
Second
Third
I propose an extra clause with the coupon law, that if you're using coupons but manage to catch the candy with your teeth in midair, you're allowed to keep it for free. This would appease both those using coupons and those throwing, as the ones who use coupons can at least have a chance at getting free snacks so they're less likely to complain.
As an American, I can confirm converting miles to kilometers does so little to help anything that even we’re onboard.
Riding on a high of your videos lately. Love them. Sad to see the 25 days are about to be over. Hopefully you'll upload regularly even after the 25 days are over.
Why does this sound more efficient than any gathering of politicians ever?
(Drops folder on the table) I call be BS on not using Mississippi for it is darn near the perfect timing of a second, other than that I am all for everything else...aslo...can I line Milk duds in my knuckles and still clock them across the jaw?
You know I could definitely agree with these laws…especially the movie one. Awesome vid had me smiling like crazy. 😄💜👍
Really hope there is a part 2 for this!
My dad refuses to pay for groceries with credit and writes a check every time. I’m not opposed to someone throwing gum at him for this.
The percentages in power and short sentence counts would make it literally impossible for me to return a guilty verdict if I was a juror
That first law is the exact reason I move quickly when walking in a parking lot, or signal a car through unless they've given me right of way. This kind of reminds me of "If Being Annoying was a Job" by Ryan George.
New law: if someone brings a baby to a theater the parent/parents will automatically be banned from the concession stands for one viewing. If the baby cries or makes a noise people can and are encouraged to bully the parents into leaving by, putting gum in their hair, insults (mainly about who brings a baby to a movie), and throwing snacks or drinks at them.
I feel they should be killed immediately, and their child raised to become Batman.
As someone from Connecticut i will now be using this. Thanks zach
I would like to point out for the slow people walking law that disabled and, as they mentioned, old people exist, some of which simply cannot go that fast, and also do not deserve to be killed for it. :) And before anyone says that if you can tell they're disabled, something else applies, I would like to add that people with invisible disabilities exist.
P.S. People who have hurt anything that's needed for walking and have to slow because of it would also fall in this group.
Yes, I understand it's a sketch for fun, it's just rubbing me the wrong way and I felt the need to mention it for...reasons?
I've never seen someone pay with a check for groceries ever. only cash or card. I don't think most stores in the states even take Check
Cashiers everywhere now upset by needing to clean up soda spills everytime someone has coupons. The law should make the coupon user liable for any mess made as a consequence of their actions.
I love how professional this is while covering normal annoyances
One is vehicular manslaughter and the rest are assault, I’m completely fine with this
The candy bar and soda options really leave out consideration for the minimum wage employees who have to clean them up, for which I propose an entirely different law discussion on what is legal for employees to do when customers are shitty
This is amazing, I wish we had laws like that!=)
Good thing they considered the packaging when throwing gum and candy bars
I feel like the coupon law should be given a time limit…. You telling me you’re gonna pass up BOGO on you favorite things?
Coupons should be fine if the store scans them, and they don't argue if the coupon isn't applicable if they get a wrong item or if it is expired. If they argue then the applied rules are valid.
Thaaaannkkk you!!
This was awesome again 😊
Merry Christmas Zach 🎄🎅🎀
The discrimination of states lmfaooo this creative bro this was hella funny
The first law, is the one the I see the most, for sure. We should, at the very least, make it socially acceptable to honk at a person making a long ass diagonally beeline for their vehicle.
'Movie theater'-themed punch is my new favorite thing.
My mother paid with coupons one time.
This was about 8 months ago, both her and my father had gotten laid off because of covid so money got tight fast, and she was doing her damn best to feed us.
The people behind us got so annoyed that my mother was almost in tears, because they were berating her, it took me telling them all to shut the fuck up, and then the cashier to tell them all off because clearly money was an issue for us, before they all just shut up finally.
Leave people who pay with coupons alone you prick's.
Will do
New law: if someone says “You Too” in an inappropriate scenario, you are legally allowed to take half of the sold products for yourself. Alternatively you can smack them across the jaw with a Whiffleball bat. If you do not have one, one will be provided for you
😂😂The New Marvel Movie had me. Was watching No Way Home yesterday and a group of people got in late talking and took a while to sit down.
My exact feelings 😂I was like. Who has a cinema themes snack I can use to punch these guys
If the lights are off and the theatre is semi full, just tell it to sit down and shut the f up, works every time, well it does in Aus cause we don't have American gun laws
The amount of research you do just for a skit lol love it keep it up happy holidays
This is way too productive to simulate how laws are made
Coupon one is a bit harsh, especially in these tough economic times.
New Law: If you work as a cashier or restaurant servant and the customer is being annoying (still defying what annoying exactly means), you can throw whatever is in your hand right now or at your very near vicinity at them at any speed (because facing off against an entitled b!tch is very annoying and nobody should experience it) and if they keep annoying you you may use any drastical measure against them, which includes killing them with no consequences.
Ehm sir, *killing!!?*
@@DrakeRing problem?
As a fastfood worker, may I also suggest that if a customer orders a very overcomplicated or annoying meal (I'm looking at you no-salt fries and chicken strips with a dozen extra strips) they may be punished by pouring coke on their heads, if continued, the employee may take them to the kitchen and dip their head in the fryer, same goes for massive groups with weird orders
In regards to the candy bar one, I want to make one addendum: if it turns out that they are allergic to nuts, which are included in the candy bar you just threw at them, you can wait five Conneticuts before giving them the epi-pen.
Is paying with checks at a grocery store actually a thing in the US?
Yes for whatever fucking reason it still is a thing we don't understand it something's just are
Almost no person under 50 does it
I havent seen it been done since I was a little kid in the earl 2000's
Mostly among the elderly, and it is fairly rare, but it does happen.
I've never seen it.
I would propose an amendment to the checkout law. If the customer has the coupons ready, and is only using a couple of them, I believe they should be given an exemption as they are clearly trying not to take up everyone's time, they just want to save a little money. I believe the law should be used to punish those who would abuse coupons, not those who use them responsibly.
you are gonna lose it when you find out that the former yugoslav republic of macedonia is not their name anymore
That's exactly what makes it ethnically neutral. So inclusive!
Yep
@@peterg76yt It would have been named Macedonia too had it not been for those meddling Greeks! 😂
New law proposal. When you're driving on the highway and two trucks block both lanes you're allowed to slam your car into their rear (not recommended)
Second, when two or three people walk together on the sidewalk you're allowed to push through them and say: "exSQUEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEZE me" in a super high pitched voice
The truck one depends on the scenario, but the sidewalk one works
my man just dropped EVERY POSSIBLE BRAND in a 4 min video lmaoo love u dude
0:35 thank you❤️
Ah yes, punish using checks. An equally legal and valid form of payment.
New Law: If a fast food employee gets your food wrong you should be allowed to throw one of the many open water bottles left sitting in your car at them ONLY if the bottle is half full. Full bottles may be thrown if this is the second time this week it’s happened, and if it’s specifically a Taco Bell or a Dunkin Donuts you may throw a steaming hot thermos of Black Coffee at the window receptionist.
Legit my biggest pet peeve in a theater. A people around you won't stop talking. B kids around you won't stop talking. C phones going off in theaters.
people that go below the speed limit for no apparent reason should have their licences taken away and when they get it back have to put a sticker on the back side of their car to shame them (open to possible suggestions for the sticker), and if caught again they should not get a permit ever again for any kind of vehicle.
Well people wouldnt go slow, if they werent punished for going fast. XD
My favourite aspect of this is that they are all in agreement, its just a matter of writing it down
As a law student, this will be an absolute nightmare of a legislation.
How the fuck are you gonna estimate the % of power applied during the scene 😂😂😂😂
Me dying just thinking about the funny shit that'll take place in courts if these are actually applicable 😂😂😂😂😂
A randomised double blind study of course :-)
@@AleksPTA The question is not the total power and partial power but the actual power used in the crime, and the actual estimation of it.
@@ArthKryst apology for not clarifying, a randomised double blind study to determine the actual maximum power. After that, simple math to determine if power used is compliant with intent of said law
@@AleksPTA but you'd need to be able to mathematically show that no other factor caused the power level to be at where it is vs where it should has actually beenm
As a person living on Earth, I'm happy you mentionned Km/h
As an alien from Saturn I am offended Zach didn't use Saturn's units
Alien hating alien phobic
Humanphilic
Right winger
As a european (UK excluded), translating mp/h to km/h was really helpful and I appreciate your open-mindedness.
Real original comment there lol
Headcanon this is the same office building where things are named in the Ryanverse
As an Australian I thank you for the unit conversion.
I also pitty the fact that you have to live in a country use measurements was created by a drunk mathematician rolling dice.
(Yes I stole that from Reddit)
Aww
Honestly I think I’d prefer getting punched in the jaw with brass knuckles rather than getting an entire drink poured on me
Zach’s hatred of annoying humans will fuel content on this channel for eternity (hopefully)
There was way more thought put into this than I expected. 😂
Another good law idea:
If a given patent is deemed to be "necessary for the immediate public good", it should be bought by the government from the patent owners for a reasonable prices (i.e. covering the research costs) and made freely available.
This would prevent problems like people and governments not being able to get enough covid vaccines or insulin for their people.
Now you’ve given a government monopoly on a product, this usually leads to shortages, as the government is very inefficient, it will also decrease development of news medicines as there is no competition.
@@nikolairostov3326 "this usually leads to shortages, as the government is very inefficient"
Absolute bollocks. Gas and electricity were state monopolies until 2002 and 2007 here in Italy with no issues whatsoever. Also, the only post-war hydroelectric disaster in Italy was caused by a private company, just as the nationalization was happening. They killed 2000 people.
The Morandi bridge collapse two years ago happened while on a private company's watch. The bridge was problematic, but while under government supervision it was properly monitored and repaired. The private sector evidently decided it was more _efficient_ to let it collapse and kill 43 people, than pay for the upkeep.
Only Americans have this stupid notion that government entities must inherently be a thousand times worse than private ones.
Also most of the technology we have today is a direct result of government funded research, and there are still many areas in which the private sector refuses to invest in any meaningful way. Private businesses are great at making incremental updates, but they don't usually like to pour billions into projects that may end up not producing anything of immediate value.
@@demoniack81 I’m not American. a public corporation is different from a private company.
@@nikolairostov3326 science shouldn't be a competition for money. Most scientists see working in their field as more than enough of a reward.
@@silviavalentine3812 competition leads to development, creating government monopolies will freeze this.
My new law is when someone listens to something out loud without using headphones/earbuds/whatever on the bus, it is permissible to throw their phone out the bus window or door.
First
Dont care
@@dinoaurus1no one asked for your opinion
@@cookie2739 and no one asked you if you were first. Your point?
@@dinoaurus1 well its not my problem you're sensitive to me commenting first
@@cookie2739 and its not my problem that youre sensitive to me expressing my opinion
Movie theatre themed punch😂 absolute gold
If only lawmaking was this efficient.
These actually sound pretty bloody fair
If only the movie laws had come out yesterday, the couple next to me in no way home WOULD NOT SHUT UP I wanted to do a milkdud themed punch so badly
This could be an entire series