Noam Chomsky: After Dangerous Proxy War, Keeping Ukraine Neutral Offers Path to Peace with Russia
Вставка
- Опубліковано 1 бер 2015
- democracynow.org - The recent ceasefire in Ukraine continues to hold after a shaky start, days after Secretary of State John Kerry publicly accused Russian officials of lying to his face about their military support for separatist rebels. The United Nations says the death toll from the nearly year-old conflict has topped 6,000. This comes as tens of thousands rallied in Moscow to honor the slain opposition leader Boris Nemtsov, who had accused Russian President Vladimir Putin of authoritarian rule. "It's fashionable in the United States and Britain to condemn Putin as some sort of distorted mind," says Noam Chomsky, but he notes no Russian leader can accept the current Ukrainian move to join NATO. He argues a strong declaration that Ukraine will be neutralized offers the path to a peaceful settlement.
Watch the full interview with Noam Chomsky on Democracy Now!, and see many more interviews with him over the years: www.democracynow.org/appearanc...
Democracy Now!, is an independent global news hour that airs weekdays on 1,300+ TV and radio stations Monday through Friday. Watch our livestream 8-9am ET: democracynow.org
Please consider supporting independent media by making a donation to Democracy Now! today: democracynow.org/donate
FOLLOW DEMOCRACY NOW! ONLINE:
Facebook: / democracynow
Twitter: / democracynow
UA-cam: / democracynow
SoundCloud: / democracynow
Daily Email: democracynow.org/subscribe
Google+: plus.google.com/+DemocracyNow
Instagram: / democracynow
Tumblr: democracynow.tumblr
Pinterest: / democracynow
iTunes: itunes.apple.com/podcast/demo...
TuneIn: tunein.com/radio/Democracy-Now...
Stitcher Radio: www.stitcher.com/podcast/democ...
People should have listened to realists like this brilliant man here.
Chomsky is not a realist. The realists are on the right.
@@mitchellbaker4806 really now? That's why what he's predicted is coming true?
@@JK360noscope I think Chomsky meant it as a warning not as a prophesy. He was not the only one. There is a very well documented histroy which lead to this.
I won't call him brilliant. He's so leftist and dumb in many waya. He's just realistic in this one case.
Freedom is not free. If we listen to "realists" we would never fought any war for liberation.
So enlightening to see American intellectuals speaking the truth.
Very proud of Mr.Chomsky for doing exactly that.
Speaking the truth is a waste of time if nobody is listening.
@@O1OO1O1 Yes, but it remains our duty nontheless.
No it’s not the truth. Russia does not have a legitimate grievance. It’s a dictatorial state that is more utterly corrupt and Ukraine is a sovereign nation that should have the democratic freedom to join whatever alliance they please. Ukraine has every right to join the alliance, which by the way it had no intention to prior to the invasion of Crimea. It has the right to self determination without fear of fucking invasion by a country that has already invaded Georgia and has demonstrated itself to be expansionist over the last century.
@@goldmemeber2000 You have no fucking idea what you're talking about but I don't even need to waste my time on you. Ukraine has the sovereign right to join NATO and aim US missiles at its neighbours, like Russia but don't be surprised when Russia takes up its own sovereign right and defends itself. You don't get to poke a bear and get away with it.
@@colejones6312 Nobody's poking this bear that's been a much Russian BS for 20 years Putin came in to office with the idea of reconstituting the Soviet Union under a different name and that's what hes been in the process of doing. Right now little moldovia will be next because you have to protect Russians there. Then come the Baltic States because you have to protect Russians there. All this trolling and listening to Russian propaganda is one of the reasons Putin made his move because he figured it were too divided do divide it to stand up to Russia. Putin's not some monster and he has very coldly calculated that he can get away with this period it's amazing him that NATO and the United States reacted to HIS INVASION as strongly as we did.
I can’t believed this interview occurred 6 years ago. All along I thought he was voicing out his opinion on the current Russian Ukrainian issue. This man is a legend and I hope the world will listen to him .
Exactly , this dispute has never been resolved. Shame
I expected this war in 2017 on the assumption that HRC would win the election and bring all the Neocons, especially Nuland in. When Trump won the election I actually heaved a sigh of relief because I knew we were saved from this war. I don't like Trump, and don't like his social policies, I'm on the left. I do however realise he was not a warmonger like these people. When Biden came in I kept an open mind and was hopeful, I thought he would keep a distance from the Neocons, but when he brought in people like Nuland war was inevitable.
The world and people wont listen to him because you dont lead a population with truth and complexity of the world but with simple concept like the big good (NATO) the big bad (Russia, China, etc..)
Regardless of the fact that the big good are ruthless murderer, and having been bombing countries for ages.
Today is 03/02/2022. Noam is my one true hero. I have tried to break down incoming information as I would expect a linguist would, by the vocabulary and words origen basis which I believe cuts to the truer meaning of the statement. What I truly wanted to say is this really makes me feel old. I was young once.
Six years and no one listened, on the contrary. Take a look at media who non-stop seems to say this horrid war happened just because Putin is a villain, and then spend the rest of the hour analyzing villain traits and saying how scary he is. Nothing done for solving anything.
Well Noam was right.
Noam is rarely ever wrong. His understanding of human nature makes him almost a prophet of our times.
Void of opinion. He speaks facts.
An incredible human
@@samantharaymond1844 rarely? Even when he denied the Bosnian genocide and also when he downplayed the Cambodian one? Or when he said that the only options for Ukrainians is to either die or surrender?
@@Bolognabeef Your lack of reading comprehension is showing. Chomsky never denies the atrocities in Bosnia happened, he only says that calling it a "Genocide" cheapens the word. If we apply the term genocide to the Bosnian War then there are, in fact, genocides happening all the time and the word loses all meaning. Did extremely heinous crimes and massacres occur during the Bosnian War? Yes, no one has ever denied that. This isn't an argument over history, it's about semantics.
He also never downplayed the Cambodian genocide. If you would actually read a book instead of relying on UA-cam clips for all your information you would have realize this beforehand. In "Manufacturing Consent" and "At War with Asia" he clearly outlines that Pol Pot and the Khmer Rogue were absolutely brutal! Chomsky's position was along the lines of : Yes, the Khmer Rogue did horrible things however, the numbers being reported by Western media to garner support were being falsified (which ended up being true) and we were conveniently ignoring similar atrocities in other parts of the world simply because they were "State Sponsored".
I won't comment on anything regarding Ukraine as it is still an ongoing conflict and there's no way of accurately judging ones opinion on the basis of historic fact.
@@Bolognabeef🥱
My God! this interview 2015? its more relevant to the current crisis than tons of media articles and interviews. This man is a legend
He is a legend, and I am grateful for him. He just did an Intercept interview this week on the current war with Ukraine and every word he spoke here is consistent with what we're seeing right now.
Did he have you at his absurd analogies of comparing Ukraine to Mexico?
Mexico didn't experience anything like the holodomor, Sovietization, Russification, direct military intervention and support of separatists. Mexico found oil and gas, the Mexican government has complete control over that. One could go on and on and on. Parts of Poland, Germany, Finland, Georgia, and other countries are now part of Russia.
Chomsky's analogies are juvenile.
@@aredditor4272 I don’t usually comment on UA-cam, but could you elaborate? I’d like to understand your perspective in more detail
No, it's not relevant at all. It's surprisingly naive.
@@aredditor4272 Couldn't agree more.
By the early 1960s, Brazilian President João Goulart was feeling a terrible squeeze. Cuba’s revolution had inspired serious left-wing agitation in Brazil, and Washington had brought a lot of pressure on Goulart to crush that sentiment.
Attempting to stay neutral in the Cold War, Goulart - himself a wealthy landowner - tried to pacify internal dissent with a broad land reform package. This alarmed his fellow elites, who appealed to the CIA for help. In 1964, the U.S. overthrew Goulart in one of the most violent CIA-backed coups up to that time. Now the U.S. is backing Ukraine's extreme right-wing Svoboda party and violent neo-Nazis whose armed uprising paved the way for a Western-backed coup in 2014 but wheres the reporting on those events ín Ukraine that fostered the potential of arm conflict with Russia? Events in the Ukraine are giving us another glimpse through the looking-glass of U.S. propaganda wars against fascism, drugs and terrorism. The ugly reality behind the mirror is that the U.S. government has a long and unbroken record of working with fascists, dictators, druglords and state sponsors of terrorism in every region of the world in its elusive but relentless quest for unchallenged global power and dominance
Behind a firewall of impunity and protection from the State Department and the CIA, U.S. clients and puppets have engaged in the worst crimes known to man, from murder and torture to coups and genocide. The trail of blood from this carnage and chaos leads directly back to the steps of the U.S. Capitol and the White house As of today
US Provides Military Assistance to 73 Percent of World’s Dictators.For decades, the American people have been repeatedly told by their government and corporate-run media that acts of war ordered by their president have been largely motivated by the need to counter acts of aggression or oppression by “evil dictators.” We were told we had to invade Iraq because Saddam Hussein was an evil dictator but we forget a CIA led coup in Iraq in 1967 help put Saddam Hussein into power 😂. We had to bomb Libya because Muammar Gaddafi was an evil dictator, bent on unleashing a “bloodbath” on his own people. Today, of course, we are told that we should support insurgents in Syria (Muslim extremist) because Bashar al-Assad is an evil dictator, and we must repeatedly rattle our sabers at North Korea’s Kim Jong-un and Russia’s Vladimir Putin because they, too, are evil dictators.
This is part of the larger, usually unquestioned mainstream corporate media narrative that the US leads the “Western democracies” in a global struggle to combat terrorism and totalitarianism and promote democracy Does the US government actually oppose dictatorships and champion democracy around the world, as we are repeatedly told answer is No. According to Freedom House’s rating system of political rights around the world, there were 49 nations in the world, as of 2015, that can be fairly categorized as “dictatorships.” As of fiscal year 2015, the last year for which we have publicly available data, the federal government of the United States had been providing military assistance to 36 of them, courtesy of your tax dollars. The United States currently supports over 73 percent of the world’s dictatorships! Lol nd we continue to go down this path for imperial dominance. We're destabilizing these countries all around the world adding more blood shed and misery in those countries for our benefit and imperial dominance and control when r we going to put out foot down as a nation and tell our government no more bs we just want peace and to coexist with our neighbors around the world enough is enough lets end all imperial endeavors and stop fueling wars, death, and poverty around the world
indeed. but now, in 2022, Putin and his Russian military, an autocrat dictator, has invaded a sovereign state without provocation, committing war crimes/atrocities. currently bombing Ukrainian civilians in an attempt to topple its government and take its people and resources. so, there’s that.
@@ichisatori war crimes i agree but why r we only looking east tho what about the allege war crimes of Ukraine before the Russian invasion? After america help stage a coup in Ukraine in 2014 the Ukrainian forces been shelling nd killing the pro Russian separatists in the donbas region for 8 yrs 80% of the killings were against pro Russian separatist amounting to over 14,000 ppl killed mostly civilians where's the reporting on that? In 2014 More than 30 people were killed in violent and chaotic clashes in the southern Ukrainian city of Odessa as pro-Ukraine activists (Nazi's) stormed a building defended by protesters opposed to the current government in Kiev and in favour of closer ties with Russia. They set the whole building on fire killing protesters nd not even a week ago Ukrainian officials were caught on video being racist at the boarder keeping black ppl in groups nd letting white Ukrainians onto the train 1st that the U.N. confirmed lol didn't surprise me seeing that Ukraine has a nazi problem in its ranks nd not to mention their national guard is Azov a hate group with neo Nazis ties nd was founded by Andriy Biletsky
Former People's Deputy of Ukraine another Nazi organization but all im hearing from u is regurgitated none sense from western Media sources lol nd that's that my friend read up a little bit more there's always 2 sides to a story nd usually in the middle is where the truth is nd lets talk about USA war crimes now in Yemen? or the illegal occupation of Syria? Or the open air prison in Palestine? Ect.. list goes on nd on my friend its the west vs the east imperialism both r guilty of war crimes but i guess we pick nd choose here who's guilty or not or better yet corporate media controls the narrative for its western propaganda lol 😂
@@ichisatori lol oh sounds like what we did in Iraq The invasion of Iraq was neither in self-defense against armed attack nor sanctioned by UN Security Council resolution authorizing the use of force by member states and thus constituted the crime of war of aggression, according to the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) in Geneva. 😆 But hey we're America we're allowed to b hypocrites because we're the gd guys i guess 😕🤔
That's actually the best comment I have ever read on UA-cam
Somebody show this comment to Joe Rogan, please!!!
Just imagine if Russia convinced Canada to join them in a military alliance? I wonder how the United States would react.
Just imagine if NATO convinced Estonia to join them in a military alliance? I wonder how russians would react.
Oh wait...
Definitely relevant now! Noam is the GOAT!
check out these videos on my ukraine debunked playlist
Empire Files, Ukraine: Questions for the US Anti-War Movement w/ Abby Martin & Brian Becker
The New Atlas Brian Berletic, SHORT: Russian Operations Begin in Ukraine - What Led to this Moment?
The New Atlas Brian Berletic, Russia isn't Starting a War in Ukraine, It is Ending One
Breakthrough News, Ukraine Powder keg: Why NATO Expansion Must End
Breakthrough News, The Untold History of NATO and Case for Its Abolition
"Knowledge is Power". Professor Chomsky enlightened me most profoundly on "current events". How men like himself and Kasporov are ignored is beyond comprehension.
This was 6 years ago nobody listens to him ever.
check out these videos on my ukraine debunked playlist
Breakthrough News, Ukraine: Questions for the US Anti-War Movement w/ Abby Martin & Brian Becker
The New Atlas Brian Berletic, SHORT: Russian Operations Begin in Ukraine - What Led to this Moment?
The New Atlas Brian Berletic, Russia isn't Starting a War in Ukraine, It is Ending One
Breakthrough News, Ukraine Powder keg: Why NATO Expansion Must End
Breakthrough News, The Untold History of NATO and Case for Its Abolition
@Dylan Martinelli
The current CIA director William Burns saw this coming in 2008, in a letter to Condi Rice.
Everyone who actually knew, and who wasn't politically motivated to lie, saw it coming.
There is a great piece on Glenn Greenwalds channel about this as well. In depth but very informative.
What are you talking about? Kasparov thinks the opposite of Chomsky's standard west-blaming.
@@sheilamacdougal4874
Chomsky doesn't exclusively blame the west. He just points out where it is to blame because no one else in mainstream discourse will. Indeed they usually do endless apologia and propaganda instead.
Unless you think we live in a world where the US and the west can do no wrong then it is incredibly important for us as citizens of these countries that someone does point out what they do wrong. When states in the west do things on the world stage, it's in service of the state and its interests. Those interests often diverge dramatically from the interests of the people.
Damn. Chomsky lays it all out 6 years ago. All of this death and destruction could have been avoided.
Could EASILY have been avoided, and yet was instead provoked into being. Who benefits? The U.S.
Math's pretty simple on this one.
EXACTLY
@@austenhead5303 Not Americans. Pentagon contractors benefits.
@@zenlei8258 Of course. The American people get no say in anything anymore. They can't even get healthcare, and their elections are absolutely useless. It's whoever owns the politicians. Or the Deep State, or whatever.
@@austenhead5303 Not really that way. Does the billionaires funded Congress/president to start a nuclear war with Russia ?
This could not have been more accurate, seven years before the events now occuring. Where will it end is the next question.
Perhaps the end of the world. It is one thing to oppress an individual. Alas! Trying to oppress a nuclear power is imbecilic!
@@michaeljoseph3528 you seem like a sussy vaca.
There is a documentary about the guy who didn't launch Russian missiles at the last minute I think it's called the man who saved the world. People should understand some of Russia's concern. Do we remember how the US reacted when Russia put missiles in Cuba? Very close call for nuclear war
Unfortunately that is not the guy in charge, kid. NEXT! :-)
Exactly!
Ukraine is a sovereign state
@@wasua100
Cuba also was a sovereign state..
@@wasua100 sovereign should not mean stupid.
This man is brillant
A Godsend!
Just listened to an Intercept interview with Chomsky on the war in Ukraine and his words today are 100% consistent with what we're hearing here.
Go back to the beginning of Noam's career. He will floor you
I read the whole thing of John Mearsheimer and he's right. Noam you're a legend.
check out these videos on my ukraine debunked playlist
Empire Files, Ukraine: Questions for the US Anti-War Movement w/ Abby Martin & Brian Becker
The New Atlas Brian Berletic, SHORT: Russian Operations Begin in Ukraine - What Led to this Moment?
The New Atlas Brian Berletic, Russia isn't Starting a War in Ukraine, It is Ending One
Breakthrough News, Ukraine Powder keg: Why NATO Expansion Must End
Breakthrough News, The Untold History of NATO and Case for Its Abolition
Me too
I say this every time I hear your wisdom as it lends me clarity and perspective, thank you Professor Chomsky for all your hard work and research. Unfortunately, we’re not worthy of your knowledge and you will be much more appreciated when it’s too late. I’m glad my studies led me to you as an 18 year old college student. God Bless you.
I believe him the highest intelectual alive.
check out these videos on my ukraine debunked playlist
Empire Files, Ukraine: Questions for the US Anti-War Movement w/ Abby Martin & Brian Becker
The New Atlas Brian Berletic, SHORT: Russian Operations Begin in Ukraine - What Led to this Moment?
The New Atlas Brian Berletic, Russia isn't Starting a War in Ukraine, It is Ending One
Breakthrough News, Ukraine Powder keg: Why NATO Expansion Must End
Breakthrough News, The Untold History of NATO and Case for Its Abolition
yer a chump if yer taken in by noam...
J SUTCLIFFE your a chump if you are taken in by MIC funded western media and the warmonger USA state department
@@Lyrielonwind He was. Age seems to have finally caught up with him now, but he was amazing for decades. This video for example is a gem and I'm glad it popped up in my recommendations just now. Luckily we have plenty of old Chomsky talks and books to learn from.
This interview is short but accurately paints a clear picture.
7 years ago he saw it! Neutral state is needed. If NATO obliged, we wouldn’t have this Bay of Pigs incident.
It feels like the twilight zone or dark mirror episode
Where time has fractured and only bits that we can see cut us to the core.
Watching this in 2022, saddened that this wise man was not heeded then.
Its our msm , the average person is told what to believe
He was. Trying to make Ukraine neutral we provoked russians to invade.
Open the map and see where Estonia is (it is a NATO member).
Prof Chomsky is such an insightful, wise and unbiased scholar - greetings from Australia 👏👏👏
Yeah... I thought so too. But when he defends removing unvaxed people from the society...
But he is right on this one.
I do not, by any means, give a wholesale endorsement to Chomsky, but on this issue, he was spot on. The argument he gave then is still the answer to this current conflict.
There will be no peace until Ukraine gives Russia a guarantee that they will remain neutral, and not even consider NATO membership.
It is still the right of Ukraine to go their own way, this is not the business of Russia in the end. Ukraine also gave up their nukes to not be attacked. Also a promise broken.
NATO is not a hostile alliance. It has never attacked a country.
@@ThysRoes Serbia was bombed to shit by NATO.
The two most powerful actors in NATO recently destroyed Iraq, leading to 15 years of carnage and a million dead.
Suddenly all these Intellectuals who spoke of heavy hearted "real politik" twenty years ago have discovered a love for pure principles of international law
@@ThysRoes Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam, Panama
@@ThysRoes Why would Ukraine want to install other country's missiles pointing at their neighbor and hence endanger its own safety provided Russia will not change their mentality in the near future? Ukraine should not become cuba in 60's. NATO is not hostile but US is.
@@ThysRoes Would you be saying that if Russia and the Warsaw Pact had staged a coup in Canada and were arming and training its new puppet regime? (Assuming you're American - adapt the analogy to wherever you live.)
I saw this video a few years back. And i come back today to see the video again. Chomsky is a man of great intellect and wisdom.He is very sharp.minded even in his nineties. But I feel sad everyday that he is getting very old and very weak I want to hear more from him and read more of his works.
Love Chomsky our rare truth teller!!!🙏🏿
I listen to both professors, and whenever I make a comment on a social media platform using basically this argument, eventually the ppl arguing run out of valid points and start calling me Putin troll.or accusing me of spreading misinformation.
Having the same experience and got banned from the discussion forum of a major Dutch news website.
Seriously, just pointing out the history is consider Putin propaganda nowadays.
i am surprised by chomsky's bad take here. this didnt start in 1990. there is a reason why ukraine doesnt want to be part of russia and wants to be a nato-member ,a reason why eastern ukraine is so russian and that started way earlier. stalin aka russia let millions of ukrainians starve, stealing their food and replaced them later on with russians. russia is just now proving again why basically all countries bordering it want to be part of the nato, cause if you arent theyll fuck you over. Chechnya, Georgia and now Ukraine for the second time can sing a song about it. stop viewing this from a usa/nato vs russia point of view. take a ukrainian perspective and learn the fucking history.
@@VICE-H3RO exactly ! It's truly sad how brainwashed people are and don't want to bother researching about Russian history
@Piotr Sieradzki
My point is US wants a chronic guerrilla war in ukraine, which is much more profitable for them, but devastating for ukr.
They not engaging directly but supplying lethal arms. They gained already so much from this war. This was all planned before hand. The euromaidan revolution, the joint military peacekeeping( laughable), bio labs, to make sure russia is provoked.
This guy must speak up again now in 2022.
No actually he doesn't understand the politics of Eastern Europe as well as he thinks.
@@hanssvoboda what he didn't understand?
Lots of great info. Wish those in power were humble enough to listen, learn from history and do better.
Chomsky never fails to be relevant. He ignores the chaff and invariably gets down to the nitty gritty.
This is an amazing video. Giving me a lot of food for thought about my views on the Ukraine crisis. Chomsky is a very wise man and is obviously correct in saying that a neutral Ukraine would have avoided the current situation which has pushed the world closer to annihilation than we have been for 60 years. He is a man of great intellect.
...and wisdom
@@mariespi96 There is only one problem. For Putin "neutral neighbouring state" means to act ridigly under russian rules, so that every neighbour is 100% slavestate to russians.
So the video is from 2015. Ukraine -Russia started conflict in 2014. Ukraine stayed neutral for all these years , but Russia didn't leave them alone . Putin wants full control
@@fungamesandstories lol no they didn't, they were asking to join nato, begging nato for weapons, saying that they will build nuclear weapons, all while killing 15,000 ethnic Russians in dontesk
In what way was that peaceful?
@@xblade11230 Donetsk from inside Ukraine right?
congratulations to this intelligent brain who not only predicted the eminent problem but also gave the solution, namely the neutralization of Ukraine
Noam is legend. I remember listening to this interview couple of years and agreeing with him completely.
Noam....spellcheck!
@@beesplaining1882 I quite like "Naomi" to be fair! :) How about "Noamy" (Noam (Chomsky) + Amy (Goodman))? ;)
@@justsomeone5936 yep Noamy works! Good call.
Chi-Om-Sky
Woww what an insight. His words are still relevant. But the mainstream US media never gives him the importance he deserves.
Because their ideology and aims are exactly opposite to Chomsky's view on how things should be pursued. Usually whomever the state is rejecting or ignoring, are exactly the kind of people you should pay attention to.
February 26,2022. This resonates now more than ever. NATO hypocrisy, American ignorance, Western arrogance. Ukraine is being used as a pawn. Sad.
Noam, you remain the world's foremost educator. Stay Strong.
As Noam Chomsky put it in a recent interview:
"There is, in fact, a surreal quality to the U.S. rejection of Austrian-style neutrality for Ukraine. U.S. policy makers know perfectly well that admission of Ukraine to NATO is not an option for the foreseeable future. We can, of course, put aside the ridiculous posturing about the sanctity of sovereignty. So, for the sake of a principle in which they do not believe for a moment, and in pursuit of an objective that they know is out of reach, the U.S. is risking what may turn into a shocking catastrophe. On the surface, it seems incomprehensible, but there are plausible imperial calculations."
Whether or not America’s support of Ukrainian sovereignty in the face of Russian imperialism is hypocritical is irrelevant. That support is an inherent good and whatever anterior motives America may have, the fact remains that without the wests support Ukraine will be overrun and occupied by Russia.
Chomsky is so determined to be blindly anti-America he’s argued his way into supporting the a bizarre pro-imperialist logic that all world powers are entitled to tell other nations what to do and establish a sphere of influence. It’s really disappointing to see so many on the left be this ass-backward on the issue.
@@thcrmsnchn1056 "inherent good" yeah, right. It's that "support " that got Ukraine in this mess in the first place. If you did not stage the coup back in 2014 all of this could've been avoided, but instead you had to put your nose where it doesn't belong as always.
@@ImpetusOmnipotens the US/west had no involvement in the Maidan Revolution. The belief that nothing political can happen without America making it happen is just American chauvinism. There are people and groups all around the world with their own set of interests and the fact that those sometimes overlap with Western interests does not imply a western conspiracy.
@@thcrmsnchn1056 Like hell they didn't, wake up buddy. It's no secret that US has had their hand in almost every regime change that was unfavourable to them throughout the world.
@@ImpetusOmnipotens Tell him to ask Guiado of Venezuela which people is he working for.And ask him to tell US /UN and allies to go and put the same effort they are putting in Ukraine Russia war should be also applicable in Israel occupation of Palestinian land.
What Chomsky doesn’t address, and what is unsurprisingly not asked of him, is whether Ukraine has a right to self-govern and decide upon it’s own alliances.
Yes, it does. Next! :-)
There is no question that Ukraine people have right for self determination but that is idealist way of thinking, in realist world
did cuba have the right to self govern in 1961?
@@vico6261 Well, it certainly hasn't since. :-)
Chomsky you light up our sight thanks
So true!!!
Keep Ukraine neutral.
Ukraine was neutral, then Russia conquered Crimea AND gave weapons to rebels in the eastern countries.
Russia treats gay people terribly, arrests journalists, disappears political opponents, and Russia has more neo-natzies in the Vagner group, and Russia is keeping a dictator in power over Belarus.
Fearing Russia conquering them, and making them into a dictatorship, Ukraine NOW, only now! Has NATO got popular support within Ukraine.
The moral thing to do is let Ukraine join NATO.
@@lucasblaise11 So true.
@@lucasblaise11 OK fine , let Ukraine join NATO now let the Russians park their nukes in Mexico. Deal or No deal? The audacity and stupidity of your comment is ridiculous, try being unbiased for a minute.
@@lucasblaise11 cause of the Odessa massacre where 100s of Russian speaking Ukrainians were killed by neo-nazi groups
@@lukphom5590 the 1941 Odessa massacre?
He's right, "a dangerous situation" that situation is now a very dangerous situation. I don't understand why Ukraine didn't push to be neutral, they would have been in much better situation now, prosperous and good relations with their neighbour Russia. Unfortunately, they chose a different path or should I say influenced to do so.
Because it's leaders are being backed by billions in western investments and payoffs.
Just follow the money.
@@KrolKaz I used to think this way, but not anymore.
@Brian Dotkoma The assumption that Russia will attack anyone who is not militarily strong enough to fend them (or has allies who will fight with and for them) is founded on what? The behaviour of the USSR in the 1950's. The USSR dissolved in 1990-91, but the cold war mentality of the West did not. There is no reason to suppose Russia would attack and occupy Ukraine - for what purpose? That would just have placed 'Russian controlled territory next to a NATO country (like Poland), when the last thing Russia wants is a NATO country on its border. That is largely what this mess is about.
As Chomsky said -They (who ever they may be) are not permitted to threaten the USA or even to be in a position where they could threaten, but the US can surround them with nuclear missiles, and the US are entitled become indignant when they want to complain about that. How dare Russia complain about the slaughter of ethnic Russians citizens of Ukraine in the Dombass Region, and worse, take action to defend them?
It is a pity that Putin chose to immediately follow the special mission into the Dombass with a full (but very soft) invasion of all of Ukraine, but even if the Russian forces had remained within the borders of Luhansk and Donetsk, their action would have been painted as an aggressive invasion, rather than the humanitarian rescue of a population which had been under artillery bombardment and siege for eight years, which is how Putin sees it.
We had almost two months of media "Russian invasion imminent " together with 'journalist' that 'reported' as if the imminent aggressive invasion had already taken place. From a public relations point of view Putin had nothing to lose by invading. Now the press mantra is "Will Putin use nuclear weapons." Let's not go there.
What would have happened if the Russian forces had not gone beyond the Dombass Region? Probably a much bigger civil war than has been carried out for the past eight years, with one side supported and supplied by NATO and the USA and the other by Russia. An all out war that would inevitably have spread to the whole of Ukraine and maybe impacted surrounding countries. Not good. But I would have been happier about the actions of Putin if he had waited a week or so to see how the West would react to the 'Special mission'. The advantage of the full invasion has been short lived and also a public relations disaster - the Western media made sure of that.
When the saturation coverage of what is going on in Ukraine at the moment is compared with the coverage of events in 2014 - which resulted in the deaths of approximately 14,000 (we can't even put an exact number on them) Ukrainians in the Dombass Region - the contrast is stark. I was completely unaware of these events a month or so ago. I have no recollection of any media in the UK in 2014 even mentioning Ukraine.
It's a lot like Yemen in that regard, where is the moral outrage about what is happening there?
@Brian Dotkoma It's not always about what YOU want, you have to consider other's as well. Let's say Mexico wanted to join an alliance which involved Russia, and Russia placed offencive weapons there which would threaten the security of the U.S, can you imagine the reaction from the U.S!.. Understand?
And you wouldn't need to worry about an invasion unless you provoke someone by crossing their red line, and also shell their people which is the case in dombass that Ukraine is responsible for and also did nothing to resolve it, and which the west turned a blind eye to.
For every action there is a reaction.
baerbock and zalensky were installed at same time by Klaus Schwab. Not Sovereign Ukraine but German rearmament and a new Iraq war playground for unwitting zalensky.
U.S military already installed starlinks and metaverse in Ukraine for this war. They still have refused to act respectful to Putin in any way.
"I disagree with every word you say, but I will readily give my life for your right to say it" Voltaire
A man who lays down the truth. What a legend
No any trust there Ukraine will never be neutral. There trying to be neutral is what cost them to day. Neutrality won't help for staying in peace even Hitler treated both neutral and non neutral equally. They can't standard in this way while Russia is armed to the teeth.What Ukraine need is to be strong national if needed nuclear state. This is way cut Putin out.
Thank you for the great interview
If nuclear wars happen, it could be a good wake up call for the slumbering masses altho a nuclear war could also be lethal for the whole human species and could be the final lesson. Nuclear wars probabaly means human species, RIP.
Truth defies time
Great information.
Does anyone keep their word when it comes to power?
There are no gentlemen.
Nobody could break it down like .... My Homie Chomsky
I'm glad these videos exist
For those who don’t know, Kennedy secretly agreed with the Soviets to remove the missiles in Turkey whilst publicly opposing the deal. This information was only recently released, well after this interview.
Noam Chomsky telling the true way before the war.
Brilliant Man. Why doesn't anyone listen to him and people like him ? I wonder ....
…”they have a case, and that case needs to be understood”, profound …
Ukraine is like a deer cornered by two wolves; one black & one white. The black wolf attacks first while the white wolf snarls and growls at the black wolf in apparent 'support' of the deer but decides to wait on the way side. Is the white wolf a friend of the deer? I think the answer is obvious. While we are sympathetic to Ukrainian's cause, we should not encourage or add fuel to the fire. Unfortunately, the deer has already been tainted by the white wolf. There is no going back and sadly, Ukraine will be the sacrificial lamb whichever way this goes, we can only hope that all Ukrainians (ethic Russians and Ukrainians alike) understands this implicitly and work towards limiting the damage and further loss of life. Sending arms & funds will only encourage more fighting and deaths and will only benefit those who stand to gain most ($$$) from this conflict and its certainly NOT the Ukrainians. This will be another stain, one that will eventually be whitewashed.
That was pretty cringy.
Today, it is 100 seconds to midnight. Take a moment to think about that. They have all failed us.
And see where we are today
Is Chomsky talking about today's events six years ago or am is all this a dream?
I think further context is in order. One important, but oft overlooked dimension in understanding the roots of Russia’s paranoia over the Ukraine is that 4 times over the past 4 centuries an invading army from the West has tried to dissolve the Russians, using the North European Plain (of which the Ukraine forms the single largest part) as a superhighway into Russia’s heartland. The NEP is the largest unobstructed plain in the world and the only way to defend it under modern military doctrine is through the use of tanks. It’s the reason why Russia has one-fifth of the world’s armour deployed along their border facing Westward, more tanks than the US, China, Germany and France combined. What is so hard to understand? The US was willing to risk nuclear war over an island off the shore of Florida barely larger than Maine. If the Chinese entered into a military and economic cooperation pact with a deeply anti-American Mexico government and started equipping and training Mexican soldiers while setting up forward facing military equipment along the Rio Grande, is there any doubt the US would raze Mexico City to the ground and turn it into a parking lot before allowing that to continue. There are no clean hands in geopolitics. If you want tales of good vs evil, then go subscribe to Disney Plus and binge on Star Wars. But the real world isn’t Disneyland, there’s only the cold calculus of balance of power geopolitics and the prospect of war. Putin is a tyrannical dictator, no doubt, but it’s perfectly legitimate for Russia to be concerned about NATO expansion on its doorstep. They literally have 4 centuries worth of pretty reliable data on that.
Wester people dont give a damn, they are way too much indulge in their own superiority/god complex at this point of our civilisation.
Im westerner myself, but Im seriously afraid of the level of fanatism we have here.. All the "Go democracy" fanatic for like 1 century.
Always jumping backwards left and right to justify bombing foreign and sovereign countries...
It would be one thing if that was just the elite, but this is normal people.
Irak, Pakistan, Syria, Lybia, Afghanistan, Yougoslavia etc... victim of the "good" NATO and still find people to defend it, more over blame the victims when the bombing create massive immigration to the... west.
We spit and humiliate..
You have provided a lot of valuable insight 👍
Sure, let's forbid countries that are afraid of beeing invaded by Hitler-like tyrants from joining NATO. But wait.. won't they still have armies and weapons of their own? Let's disarm them too! ...better disarm the rest of europe as well, so Russia can feel safe.
@@cesarferrolho1647 You are missing the point, we promised that we wouldn't expand nato, we promised peaceful relations with the ussr
All of this was documented in Declassified reports
Then we broke that promise expanding nato 5 times
The equivalent would be two guys with guns
They agree to not shoot each other and not walk past a line on the ground
One guy then grabs his gun and crosses the line and heads towards the other guy, he gets warned 5 times to stop but keeps moving forwards, refuses to negotiate
I would say that it would be perfectly rational to shoot this guy who clearly won't negotiate and broke his promises to leave you alone
@@xblade11230 The point is that those countries don't want to be invaded, like some of them were during WWII by Nazi Germany. They can't protect themselves against a nuclear power run by a dictator. NATO should just forbid them to join? So about agreements... what about Ukraine handing over their nuclear weapons to the Russian Federation in exchange of not beeing attacked by them? That went well...
In this soundbite era no one is interested in really investigating what’s going on and are instead easily swayed by headlines etc. maybe someone should have taken heed of Noam Chomsky’s words and wouldn’t be where we are now in 2022
Tell that to the US talk show crazies fueling war hysteria
That 7 years ago!! Has she listened to what he said?! Check her channel this week. Unbelievable.
Thanks Amy for inviting Noam Chomsky...the living legend/ historian
Watching this now after Russia invading Ukraine, Noam was spot on.
As always. He's a smart man. Too bad we can't learn how to learn history. You know what they say.....
He was totally wrong though, Russia admitted it wants to annex Ukraine.
@@pax6833 nope
Yeah, show me where he said that? If he does annex, after years of trying for a peaceful solution it's because he forced too...
He was so right! That doomsday clock must be like at half a minute right about now.
Great interview. He’s amazing.
This aged rather well
As Always the most accurate analysis given by an honest giant irreplacable peace loving american...thank god there are still Man of avant garde who are ready to Say the truth Come what may!!!god bless you Mr Chomsky !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
This one is 7 years old and still relevant
I wish Mr Chomsky could say that to the in charge and the wast audience. Today they say that such agreement was never discussed, on the table and that Mr Gorbatchev confirmed somewhere that they did not speak about NATO at that time.
Hope to hear cables on the ‘one inch to the east’ gentleman agreement .. that could possibly end the crisis today
Very informative. Thanks
This was great Noam still had his fastball and this was before Amy was utterly mired in identity race reductionist politics and her brain went crazy over Russia Hysteria.
That's sad to hear, but I have a hard time seeing Amy falling for the Russia hysteria (maybe not identity politics though, because there are some legitimate points to be made there). I'll have to look it up later!
@@justsomeone5936 Im not hating on Amy, she has done so much for so many years, but with Trump, she seemed to move into emotional thinking which is on understandable because Trump was a con artist vulgarian showman. But Amy gave credence to the Russia collusion evidence free conspiracy theory. SHe stopped inviting figures , like Glen Greenwald, Aaron Mate, Stephen Cohen and Matt Taibi- all of whom were debunking the core assertions that trump was colluding and serving as a pupet of Russia. Russian hysteria manufatured consent for increased tensions with nuclear Russia.
Ukraine wants to seperate themselves from Russia economically too. It's not just NATO.
This aged well
There was an agreement with Russia that Ukraine would be unarmed of its nuclear weapons in exchange for territorial sovereignty. NATO had stated Ukraine would not be a part of NATO and still refuses to provide heavy weapon support.
This one was violated just in two years.
"No Russian leader, no matter who it is, could tolerate" Ukraine joining NATO. Let that sink in.
A democratic leader of Russia wouldn't care, and would feel no threat from NATO. And its smaller neighbors would be disincentivized to join NATO, if they perceived no threat from Russia.
@@JK-br1mu Democracy or not, leaders should care about what their neighbors are doing. No competent leader would ignore a neighbor who wishes to join a military alliance opposing his country. Or any opposing bloc, for that matter. You can't ignore the fact that the closer NATO gets to Russia, the more likely it becomes to have a catastrophic NATO-Russia conflict.
It's not just the political situation at the moment, politicians change, and at some point some fearless right-wing idiot, relying on the comfortable backing of NATO, will decide to go on a crusade against Russia to 'make it pay' or whatever reason.
It's also not safe from the Russian side, what if in the future some fearless idiot decides that NATO doesn't have the political will to defend small eastern countries at a moment.
Honestly, it should be common sense that independent entities with nuclear arsenals are better to be kept away from each other.
No realist buys this bull. The only person in Russia who would ever be called a "democratic leader" by the West is a US puppet...
@@bignuts4943 "realist" aka far left filth that always sides with totalitarians. Any democratic leader in Russia who allowed free speech, free press and freedom for political opposition would be called a democratic leader.
That's the crux of it right there.
I have been reading Prof Chomsky since American Power and the New Mandarins. His only equal is perhaps Mr Kasparov. Why can't we produce politicians that think like this?
We do. Politicians think like this; they know what they're doing all the way through. But they got different goals
One of Chomskys themes has always been that the power structure only thinks of consequences in terms of damage to the structures own interests. Which is probably Marxist, but is still a powerful critique.
Wow thanks
It‘s a pity that you can‘t find any critical articles or interviews in 2022. What‘s happening in Ukraine? And why?
Before the attack Russia demanded removal of NATO forces from most of the Eastern Bloc. And not much later it started to demonstrate the very reason we desperately need those NATO forces in our countries. Hungary was a severely oppressed Soviet puppet state for 40 years, and then 12 yrs ago we elected a PM with supermajority that's first move was to twist election law to ensure he stays in power, since then 2 elections were held, both times ~50% of votes gained him at least 2/3 of the seats. And in the meantime he betrayed his nation to Russian interest on several occasions, slowly drifting us back under Russian influence. Just look at his recent actions, he is constantly trying to undermine Western attempts of sending strong messages aimed to make Moscow stop the massacre. I don't have the slightest doubt of the fate of my country without NATO guarding our independence, I have no doubt the invasion of Ukraine would spill over to our land as well if we weren't in the alliance. We joined NATO for a very good reason. We as well as the Ukrainians have the right for freedom. And sometimes freedom comes with a cost.
With all respect to Mr. Chomsky, he is being a blindfolded pacifist when he believes Russia can be handled with diplomacy, agreements or mutual respect. Russia only understands force, as once again everyone can see with their own eyes. At least they should see it now, if the currently unfolding events don't wake up those people, then they are totally hopeless.
And I can't stress this enough. Russia in possession of the world's largest nuclear arsenal has NO reason to feel threatened, at all. There is simply ZERO chance anyone from the West would be reckless enough to question their territorial integrity. It's a carefully crafted false pretext so they can continuously threaten other states territorial integrity and even interfere with their democratic processes. Don't bother the fact that ICBM silos are all over the world, in Western Europe and all across the US mainland, all could reach any part of Russia with ease. When will they demand removing those too, because they are feeling threatened?
It was only a few weeks ago when Putin and Chinese president Xi signed a document clearly underlining their negligence to respect democracy as a system of governance and their alliance against the West. How does anyone still think that this is about Ukraine? That he will stop there if he succeeds with his invasion? This goes way further than that, this is already about questioning our core values and our freedom. Back in 2015 it was not that clear, but now? Grow up, open your eyes. This is happening. To us. If we let it happen.
Totally agree. Putin and China want a New World Order in which democracy does not happen. This is it. People of the Free World and those under oppression: rise up to defend Ukraine.The time has come. United to take action. Now.
Thank you🙏 Prof Chomsky.
I indulge with a great deal of your work and philosophy.
Thank you 🙏
Hes right on this
This is how reason sounds to me. What does it need to empower this intelligence to impact the world more?
reaching back in time, i ask again: why no mention of the Ukrainian people to decide what future alliances they wish to make?
Exactly! Chomsky is one of those dudes who just can't fathom that it is not on Russia or anyone else to decide what Ukraine needs to be or do. It's almost like he disavows Ukrainianians of their right to self-determination.
Rarely agreed on anything he's said..but on this & after what's happened he's 100% correct
Very prescient presentation by Noam Chomsky, given the current circumstances in Ukraine
i was looking for this
The problem with pacifism is the people who are not.
Where did that @valgehiir guy go? Deleted all his comments too. So much for Ukraine moving 'towards European values'- freedom of speech and thought seem not to be part of these famed European values.
Thank you sir ,,,
Mr Chomsky you should give some lessons to the politicians of the West!
Back in the day when democracynow was not neoconnow
Lol Democracy Now does one thing you don’t like and now it is “neocon”? Get serious about politics and realize that things aren’t black and white
Aaron, it’s vastly more than “one thing.”
@@MichaelGoldenberg So vast that you didn't even describe one thing
@@Aaron-wy9nb but then, you didn’t stipulate what the “one thing” was you claim put Denis off from the show. So I assumed this wasn’t a graduate seminar at Harvard.
@@MichaelGoldenberg because he nor you can actually explain what the problem. Purity politics at its finest
Same reason Chairman Mao felt China need to keep American at bay, with a buffer zone of Korea. Korean War, Chosen Reservoir follow were history.
The public should watch this to make informed decisions
Awesome! Thanks!
Now is time to see this interview
Solution:
* Negotiate with Russia
* To satisfy security concerns.
* Declare Ukraine independent and neutral zone.
* Make Putin pay for restoration of Ukraine
* Dissolve NATO.
Europe already has the European union.
YES!
A few points here:
1. There were negations and attempted ceasefires, mainly the failed Minsk accords. They were doomed to fail because Russia refused to even acknowledge its military involvement in the Donbas war.
2. Russia has no security concerns. Their security is guaranteed by their thousands of nuclear weapons.
3. Who the hell would be “declaring” Ukraine to be neutral? Ukraine is a sovereign nation that can associate with whoever it wants. The idea that great powers can order smaller nations around is literally just imperialism.
4. Don’t disagree with that
5. You realize the EU is not a defensive pact right? Do you expect the Baltic states/Poland/Romania to fight off Russian imperialism all on their own? NATO is the primary reason Russia is not invading these countries and instead invading Ukraine.
If you dissolve NATO the rest will automatically happen. Russia dissolved the Warsaw Pact 30 years ago and pulled all the nukes out. Good gesture.
@@thcrmsnchn1056 did you not watch the interview smfh
@@westville1916 I am thinking he did not.
Wow Noam shedding light here
Wise man. A treasure of our age.
As relevant today...
Ukraine becoming a Neutral country is definitely the best option for everyone!
They should have the right as a democracy to determine their own future though you would think.
@@simonhill6267 you're a clueless inbred. Ukraine isn't a democracy, you ass clown. Ukraine is no different than Russia, they both lock up political opposition and silence dissent....like the filthy leftist Bolsheviks in the west are trying to do.
@@cataniamommaitalia87 Yes, Zelenskyy a comedic TV actor who ran his campaign initially as a joke was a totalitarian dictatorial mastermind all along. Genius
And I'm the Fairy Godmother and I can wave a wand and making neutral even though Russia will never let it be neutral 2014 invasion of Ukraine 2022 invasion of Ukraine Give It Up
To late
What a wisdom and what an insight. Unfortunately many has already degraded down to the level of lamb and 🐑 and just swallow any narrative doctored out of context, w/o a context even. Sheep that follows the herd/flow
This interview aged well
Wisdom of years ignored by warmongers who profit from war business
Chomsky is a canning warmonger though. But you must have an IQ score above room temperature to understand the fact that by trying to be neutral we provoked russians to invade.
Learn from Finland's history. Learn from Estonia's history. Only strength deters a bully.
Open a map. See where Estonia, a member of NATO, is located. Did russians invade Estonia? No? I wonder why.
@@theodoredy Not strength- ruining your own country and selling yourself to US capital.
If the US wins, Ukraine loses, if Russia wins, Ukraine loses. There is no hope for Ukraine.
@@theodoredy Animal, you're writing nonsense.This is noticeable in your avatar since these are the colors of downs. It is clear that you are mentally ill and stupid as a fish. People like you can't understand smart people, because there is no mind. Don't even try to comprehend what Chomsky is saying. You can't do it.