Thanks so much for making this video. This is just what I've been looking for. The reason ACC runs so bad in VR is because Kunos chose to use the deferred rendering option of the unreal engine instead of forward rendering option, which is for virtual reality.
@@MAMAMA341 I’m on 8kx; I’m definitely pro VR. Triples can be nice. But I mainly use large 4k TVs myself, but then for games where I wanna go wide I configure a 21:9 resolution. Obviously not close to 48:9 :) i did have a 32:9 for a while but it was in a time I wasn’t racing and then found the 4k TVs more versatile.
Great video! Thank you. I have the exact same video card and cpu as you stated and have been throwing around the idea of VR for all those games. Definitely going to use your settings once I get my head set. Thanks again!
LOL.... I feel your pain about wanting a 3080 and having to go higher. I also wanted a 3080 but one day, a Radeon RX6900XT appeared in stock at a local retailer, I snapped it up and have been pleased with it so far (had it for a little over a month now), I paired it with a Ryzen 5600x and here too I am happy. I have been turning up the eye candy while using my Valve Index at 90hz and will sometimes go down to 80hz to test out using even more eye candy (I don't notice a difference in smoothness between 90 and 80hz for sim racing). Thank you for making this video, you have given me a few settings ideas for various sims which I will try, also, there so very little informational videos regarding the new line of GPUs from both nVidia and AMD when used in VR and especially Sim Racing in VR. It's a great service you are doing for your viewers, thank you! :)
Thanks Jack, for that awesome feedback. I agree 80hz is perfectly good for sim racing. Glad you found the video was useful. I discovered some results I didn't expect during all the testing, so it was a useful project to work on and share.
Wow, great content 👍👊. Is your Fps vr still working everywhere? Since yesterday It's only showing in acc vr, but not in automobilista, pc 2. Maybe a setting somewhere.
I have a 3080 and i9 10900k, and ACC is still a nightmare, I use HP reverb G2 so maybe its the resolution of the headset, i have messed with settings for hours! i have a Oculus Quest 2 coming next week also a 3090, hoping I can at least get a locked 90 on ACC, I don't really feel that confident tho!! ACC is a superb game but VR is garbage, such a shame.... also let me add iRacing is by far the best game in VR regarding performance and clarity Ive played and I’ve pretty much played them all, iRacing looks better in VR than it does on a monitor, weird...Great vid
I have 3070 with i7 10 k , and oculus quest 2. I can not run acc in vr. Just will give it one more try with super sampling at 160. Project cars 2 and automobilista 2 run good. Iracing I still have to try.
I have the g2 and a 3090 and you will not lock the 90 frames with the original headset resolution. Only way to get stable 99 fps is to reduce the pixel density. In my case 70 % . Sadly , Nürburgring and Spa use a lot of performance , on this tracks i have to reduce to 60 %. I returned now to classic AC with SOL. New FFB feels like ACC and i have stable frames with full resolution. Hope, the DLSS option in unreal 4 engine will come soon, maybe thats the gamechanger for acc in vr .
@@phenrysmueller3597 I can set the reverb to 60hz and it pretty much stays locked at 60fps even with extreme weather, full grid and high graphics setting including resolution at 100 also pixel density at 100, problem is the flicker at 60hz with the G2, that’s why I have Quest 2 coming as that can be set to 80hz and I think this will be best for ACC as the reverb needs more juice to run at 90, i wish reverb had a 80hz mode with no flicker
ACC is badly optimized no doubt. Bur for me with a rift s, the jump from a 1080ti to rx 6900xt made a huge difference.... Now I always have a smooth experience with max 80 fps,render scale 100 and ss 1.5. No matter the ai or weather, butter smooth. I do use json and ini files from the racedepartment community tho. Unfortunately I have to return my video card because of no support in render software...
I wouldn't mind checking out a Pimax and Reverb G2. I'm trying to gather other headsets to review, but that will take time. I'm still totally happy with the Valve Index as my main VR headset, so don't have any interest to change it anytime soon.
I made the jump from index to pimax 8KX. I’m super happy with the upgrade. The 3090 is choking though as i prefer largest fov and good settings, vram is easily at 15gb too :)
@@patrickroza3073 dang i was thinking of getting the pimax 8kx but i have a 3080ti with only 12gb of VRAM...who knew the 3090 would be useful for gamers with that 24gb
The trick to capture VR footage from AC is using OBS and the OpenVR plugin. That uses the headset view instead of the distorted desktop monitor view. There's YT vids on using the OpenVR plugin.
You can with a crafty workaround. On your gaming PC you run OBS and set it up the scene, but you don't record. Instead, in OBS you send the full screen preview to the recording PC window.
Super interesting video. I’m running a 2080ti and consider upgrading too.. did you try 80fps instead of 90 in ACC? Do you prefer the 10 extra fps over fidelity? Thanks again for the information
I find the problem with ACC is many graphics settings don't scale very well with the expected visual quality/load you expect at those settings. So running at 80fps to free up resources doesn't make it look more pretty if you move up from say low to medium settings. You need them at high or ultra to enjoy any tangible eye candy benefit. But you then hit CPU load issue again even at 80fps and you'll get massive framerate drops at certain sections of the track.
@@SimRacingCorner I just tested with your settings but if I turn anti-aliasing off there is a huge amount of flickering around the edges of everything. Even at 160% SS. Doesn't that bother you?
@@JonasWindey I do know what you mean, it not ideal. I didn't use the in-game AA as I really don't like the blur it applies to the entire image. I find it's almost like it appears out of focus and it gives me eye strain after a time as my brain is trying to focus the image. It's a no-win situation really, shimmering edges or blur. I went with the shimmer. Ideally increasing the SS can improve that, but then it hits you with big frame dips again at certain points on the track.
I am missing iRacing ... ACC I will not use - sucks in VR, AMS2 never tried and AC tooo much mods needed to run it, but almost no more oline races ... iRacing worked fine on my i5-9600K with the RTX 2080 - my new i9-10900K, RTX 3090 (MSI ventus 24G OC) und 64GB RAM (3200MHz) will do good, but I want the best possible settings
Is the Valve index (in your opinion) the best VR headset for sim racers who aren't interested in any other form of gaming just dedicated sim racing, who also have similar spec PCs to yours? I know you have tested a few VR headsets in some of your other excellent videos so I'd be very interested to hear your thoughts. Cheers 🍻
I guess if the user is 100% VR sim racer, then it's a fair option. The comfort (both on your head and eyes), build quality and balance of features are great. Personally, I race with a monitor and VR. Mostly on the monitor. But I also play (many) other VR games, and the Index is a great headset all round. But I will admit I use the Quest 2 more than any other headset, I like the versatility (PC and Quest gaming), light weight, and comfort (once you've changed the head strap). The Quest 2 works just fine with PC games and sim racing. The Quest 2 is much better value for money than the Index. But the Index is the better dedicated headset for PC gaming. But not by so much, at least for me, as I usually use the Quest 2 for PC VR gaming most of the time.
@@SimRacingCorner cheers for getting back to me bud 👍, I have a quest 2 with an aftermarket headstrap so it's pretty comfy 👌. I just wondered if the Index worked better having a dedicated dpv lead, I also thought the pov was a touch wider too?. I think il stick with the quest 2 for now and maybe await the arrival of the quest 3/ Pimax Crystal and the much coveted Index 2 apparently in the works 👌 . Thanks again for all the info, I too run the 9900k cpu, it's a great cpu for over clocking too. I followed a great guide by Boosted Media and I get 5ghz on all cores, well worth it 👍
Index FOV is larger, and noticeable. But not quite enough where it's a big enough deal over the Quest 2 really. You need to look at the Pimax for FOV where things step a notch. I did forget to say, the colours on the Index are more vibrant, but the Quest 2 has less SDE.
@@SimRacingCorner I did take a look at the Pimax 5k and 8k, I got a bit put off with the feeling that their a bit of a faff to get working properly, I'm hoping the Crystal is a bit more of a finished and polished device, it certainly looks good so far according to early reports. I'm very happy with the 49"odyssey I've got in the mean time, I do think vr will be the mainstream way we all play simulation games in the not too distant future though 👍
I'm on 3090FE i9700k @5k with Pimax 8kx and I am running 98% GPU 11ms and CPU at 60%total without compromising resolution. It's all about finding the best compromise and use the engine.ini suggested @rd. You can start reducing visible cars and their LOD.
@@patrickroza3073 Agreed at the start, but I normally do min 1h races, so at the end doesn't bother me too much. And yes might have some drops here and there, but barely noticeable. you can find custom engine.ini at RaceDepartment (rd) or Kunos forum under VR.
My RTX 3090 arrives next week and I am pairing with an HP Reverb G2. I’m hoping the equivalent of 120-150% super sampling on a Valve Index means I can run native resolution on the G2 with the 3090.
I have the same system but with reverb g2. I have to agree acc is a big disappointment and rf2s ui is painful and graphics too old. Assetto corsa looks good especially with sol but graphics of the actual cars is starting to show its age. Ac2 would be great. It's only going to get better. Good video
Thanks Geoff. The UI in rF2 is a pain in VR, the mouse pointer tends to disappear near the edge of the screen where the settings button lives. AC2 would be good to see, as long as it's not using Unreal of course.🤞
How do these games perform with the G2 with that hardware? I have a G2, 3080ti and 5900x. Titles like AMS2 I have the settings so low, in game and SteamVR and I still get areas on every track that tank the performance so bad, and it doesn’t snap out if it for up to 10 seconds. You can cover some distance in a Formula car in 10 seconds. It’s ruining the experience for me.
Great performance and I thought the CPU-bottleneck will be worse. Still no RTX 3090 available below 2200 Euros in Germoney and I would need this 1k Watt power-supply on top, but no need for 2D anyway. To hell with the bitcoin-miners😠😛
A 850w PSU should be plenty unless you're OC'ing the PC and GPU within an inch of its life. I have a wall plug wattage meter and it maxed at about 560-570 watts playing Cyberpunk and Red Dead 2. A decent 750 watt PSU should be safe too. 570 is well under the 20% margin recommended by PC builders. Yeah, Bitcoin miners are a bunch of @%^&%$'s.
@@SimRacingCorner Thanks for the info and my 600 watt Be quiet might be enough to power a RTX 3080, which should stay under 500 watt in most tests. But they aren't available either for reasonable prices.
Well timed sir, just in time before the 'Brexit' price hike on PC hardware is about to kick in. I don't see most of 2021 being much kinder for hardware sadly. I pushed ahead with all my planned upgrades at the back end of last year for that reason.
@@SimRacingCorner Thx for the quick reply, I got some money to buy a new PC to set up with a sim rig I have to decide either to buy a triple screen or a VR set , you think its great to play only on VR ? as I'm worried if I played 4 hours he could be exausting? ( FYI I never use a VR ).
@@MAMAMA341 VR is more tiring on my eyes than a monitor. That said I can run VR for a few hours and I'm fine. So it's not what I would consider a problem. VR doesn't destroy my eyes, but it's better to stare at a monitor than VR over an extended session.
@@MAMAMA341 WRC9 doesn't have VR. It's just the Dirt Rally games. Unlike the 3080's which disappear within minutes. When any 3090's hit retailers they seem to stick around for a few hours or a couple of days because of the higher price. At least that was the case when I found this in stock last year at Scan.
▶ You can support me on Patreon: www.patreon.com/simracingcorner
▶ Buy a Coffee for Sim Racing Corner: ko-fi.com/simracingcorner
Thanks so much for making this video. This is just what I've been looking for. The reason ACC runs so bad in VR is because Kunos chose to use the deferred rendering option of the unreal engine instead of forward rendering option, which is for virtual reality.
That's interesting, I guess we can consider VR for ACC is set in stone and will alway remain a bit pants.
I love acc in VR but it’s a difficult title to run for sure. Can’t wait for their future titles. Blurry distance is killing me at times.
@@patrickroza3073 does ACC got blurry distance even on the index? you recomend triple set up rather than vr |?
@@MAMAMA341 I’m on 8kx; I’m definitely pro VR. Triples can be nice. But I mainly use large 4k TVs myself, but then for games where I wanna go wide I configure a 21:9 resolution. Obviously not close to 48:9 :) i did have a 32:9 for a while but it was in a time I wasn’t racing and then found the 4k TVs more versatile.
Great video! Thank you. I have the exact same video card and cpu as you stated and have been throwing around the idea of VR for all those games. Definitely going to use your settings once I get my head set. Thanks again!
LOL.... I feel your pain about wanting a 3080 and having to go higher. I also wanted a 3080 but one day, a Radeon RX6900XT appeared in stock at a local retailer, I snapped it up and have been pleased with it so far (had it for a little over a month now), I paired it with a Ryzen 5600x and here too I am happy. I have been turning up the eye candy while using my Valve Index at 90hz and will sometimes go down to 80hz to test out using even more eye candy (I don't notice a difference in smoothness between 90 and 80hz for sim racing). Thank you for making this video, you have given me a few settings ideas for various sims which I will try, also, there so very little informational videos regarding the new line of GPUs from both nVidia and AMD when used in VR and especially Sim Racing in VR. It's a great service you are doing for your viewers, thank you! :)
Thanks Jack, for that awesome feedback. I agree 80hz is perfectly good for sim racing. Glad you found the video was useful. I discovered some results I didn't expect during all the testing, so it was a useful project to work on and share.
Brilliant video buddy, very very helpful!
I knew not to even think about firing up ACC in vr 😁 My 1st gen Ryzen 5 would melt. Thanks for the informative video. Cheers 🍺
Give it another 100 years of CPU advancements and your grandchildren will fully enjoy ACC in VR with all the settings at medium.😂
I am running a i9 10850k and an rtx 3080 with the reverb g2 and got acc running smoothly in vr.
Cpu wise it seems fine on my 5800x. (3090 and 8kx). I use 37fps smoothed to 75; the gpu is the bottleneck :)
Great content well explained half way through and enjoying all the details
Much appreciated!
Thank you so very much. This is EXACTLY what I was looking for. THank you. Alredy subscribed.
Thanks for the sub!
Did you use the custom shaders when running Assetto Corsa? I have content manager and am struggling to get the settings right... I also have a 3090
Wow, great content 👍👊. Is your Fps vr still working everywhere? Since yesterday It's only showing in acc vr, but not in automobilista, pc 2. Maybe a setting somewhere.
Thank you. Yeah, FPSvr seems to be working normally for me in all my VR titles including AMS2.
Great work man!
Also going from a 1080Ti to a 3090 and am excited to see how it performs w/ a 5800x
What is your pros and cons?
Did you ever get a chance to test the 3090 with the 5800x?
@@luked1964 lol i wish he did and got back to us
@@malonembappe6509 yeah…that would have been nice but I’ve got some doubts it will happen now 😆
@@luked1964 hehe
Absolutely brilliant video. But seriously! No iracing added in there ??? Still enjoyed though very informative and entertaining
Very interesting video thankyou. OBS can kill up to 8-9fps.
I have a 3080 and i9 10900k, and ACC is still a nightmare, I use HP reverb G2 so maybe its the resolution of the headset, i have messed with settings for hours! i have a Oculus Quest 2 coming next week also a 3090, hoping I can at least get a locked 90 on ACC, I don't really feel that confident tho!! ACC is a superb game but VR is garbage, such a shame.... also let me add iRacing is by far the best game in VR regarding performance and clarity Ive played and I’ve pretty much played them all, iRacing looks better in VR than it does on a monitor, weird...Great vid
Thanks for the feedback. One day I'll jump into iRacing for sure, I've only heard good things about how well it runs in VR.
I have 3070 with i7 10 k , and oculus quest 2. I can not run acc in vr. Just will give it one more try with super sampling at 160. Project cars 2 and automobilista 2 run good. Iracing I still have to try.
I have the g2 and a 3090 and you will not lock the 90 frames with the original headset resolution. Only way to get stable 99 fps is to reduce the pixel density. In my case 70 % . Sadly , Nürburgring and Spa use a lot of performance , on this tracks i have to reduce to 60 %.
I returned now to classic AC with SOL. New FFB feels like ACC and i have stable frames with full resolution.
Hope, the DLSS option in unreal 4 engine will come soon, maybe thats the gamechanger for acc in vr .
@@phenrysmueller3597 I can set the reverb to 60hz and it pretty much stays locked at 60fps even with extreme weather, full grid and high graphics setting including resolution at 100 also pixel density at 100, problem is the flicker at 60hz with the G2, that’s why I have Quest 2 coming as that can be set to 80hz and I think this will be best for ACC as the reverb needs more juice to run at 90, i wish reverb had a 80hz mode with no flicker
ACC is badly optimized no doubt. Bur for me with a rift s, the jump from a 1080ti to rx 6900xt made a huge difference.... Now I always have a smooth experience with max 80 fps,render scale 100 and ss 1.5. No matter the ai or weather, butter smooth. I do use json and ini files from the racedepartment community tho.
Unfortunately I have to return my video card because of no support in render software...
If you were to try or upgrade to a new vr headset this year which one which you go with sir? Epic content btw!!
I wouldn't mind checking out a Pimax and Reverb G2. I'm trying to gather other headsets to review, but that will take time. I'm still totally happy with the Valve Index as my main VR headset, so don't have any interest to change it anytime soon.
I made the jump from index to pimax 8KX.
I’m super happy with the upgrade. The 3090 is choking though as i prefer largest fov and good settings, vram is easily at 15gb too :)
I'm eyeing up a second hand Pimax 5k right now. It's good to see that 24gb being put to good use.
@@patrickroza3073 dang i was thinking of getting the pimax 8kx but i have a 3080ti with only 12gb of VRAM...who knew the 3090 would be useful for gamers with that 24gb
hello buddy quick one how did u capture the assetto corsa is that a 2 pc capture or single pc?
I have a second PC capturing here.
@@SimRacingCorner I have issues with assets corsa when in vr my monitor display is very narrow not sure why
The trick to capture VR footage from AC is using OBS and the OpenVR plugin. That uses the headset view instead of the distorted desktop monitor view. There's YT vids on using the OpenVR plugin.
@@SimRacingCorner but u cant do that if you are using second pc to strream or recor or can you?
You can with a crafty workaround. On your gaming PC you run OBS and set it up the scene, but you don't record. Instead, in OBS you send the full screen preview to the recording PC window.
For RaceRoom, did you change any nvidia control panel settings and how are jaggies on curbs, fences, etc?
With my in-game settings shown in the video and this hardware the picture was very sharp.
Super interesting video. I’m running a 2080ti and consider upgrading too.. did you try 80fps instead of 90 in ACC? Do you prefer the 10 extra fps over fidelity? Thanks again for the information
I find the problem with ACC is many graphics settings don't scale very well with the expected visual quality/load you expect at those settings. So running at 80fps to free up resources doesn't make it look more pretty if you move up from say low to medium settings. You need them at high or ultra to enjoy any tangible eye candy benefit. But you then hit CPU load issue again even at 80fps and you'll get massive framerate drops at certain sections of the track.
@@SimRacingCorner I just tested with your settings but if I turn anti-aliasing off there is a huge amount of flickering around the edges of everything. Even at 160% SS. Doesn't that bother you?
@@JonasWindey I do know what you mean, it not ideal. I didn't use the in-game AA as I really don't like the blur it applies to the entire image. I find it's almost like it appears out of focus and it gives me eye strain after a time as my brain is trying to focus the image. It's a no-win situation really, shimmering edges or blur. I went with the shimmer. Ideally increasing the SS can improve that, but then it hits you with big frame dips again at certain points on the track.
I am missing iRacing ... ACC I will not use - sucks in VR, AMS2 never tried and AC tooo much mods needed to run it, but almost no more oline races ... iRacing worked fine on my i5-9600K with the RTX 2080 - my new i9-10900K, RTX 3090 (MSI ventus 24G OC) und 64GB RAM (3200MHz) will do good, but I want the best possible settings
Is the Valve index (in your opinion) the best VR headset for sim racers who aren't interested in any other form of gaming just dedicated sim racing, who also have similar spec PCs to yours? I know you have tested a few VR headsets in some of your other excellent videos so I'd be very interested to hear your thoughts. Cheers 🍻
I guess if the user is 100% VR sim racer, then it's a fair option. The comfort (both on your head and eyes), build quality and balance of features are great. Personally, I race with a monitor and VR. Mostly on the monitor. But I also play (many) other VR games, and the Index is a great headset all round. But I will admit I use the Quest 2 more than any other headset, I like the versatility (PC and Quest gaming), light weight, and comfort (once you've changed the head strap). The Quest 2 works just fine with PC games and sim racing. The Quest 2 is much better value for money than the Index. But the Index is the better dedicated headset for PC gaming. But not by so much, at least for me, as I usually use the Quest 2 for PC VR gaming most of the time.
@@SimRacingCorner cheers for getting back to me bud 👍, I have a quest 2 with an aftermarket headstrap so it's pretty comfy 👌. I just wondered if the Index worked better having a dedicated dpv lead, I also thought the pov was a touch wider too?.
I think il stick with the quest 2 for now and maybe await the arrival of the quest 3/ Pimax Crystal and the much coveted Index 2 apparently in the works 👌 .
Thanks again for all the info, I too run the 9900k cpu, it's a great cpu for over clocking too. I followed a great guide by Boosted Media and I get 5ghz on all cores, well worth it 👍
Index FOV is larger, and noticeable. But not quite enough where it's a big enough deal over the Quest 2 really. You need to look at the Pimax for FOV where things step a notch. I did forget to say, the colours on the Index are more vibrant, but the Quest 2 has less SDE.
@@SimRacingCorner I did take a look at the Pimax 5k and 8k, I got a bit put off with the feeling that their a bit of a faff to get working properly, I'm hoping the Crystal is a bit more of a finished and polished device, it certainly looks good so far according to early reports.
I'm very happy with the 49"odyssey I've got in the mean time, I do think vr will be the mainstream way we all play simulation games in the not too distant future though 👍
@@SimRacingCorner and The reverb g2?
I'm on 3090FE i9700k @5k with Pimax 8kx and I am running 98% GPU 11ms and CPU at 60%total without compromising resolution. It's all about finding the best compromise and use the engine.ini suggested @rd. You can start reducing visible cars and their LOD.
What’s @rd? I hate car pop in and out however :(
Don’t you have a lot of dropped frames at 98% usage? I’m aiming at 85 with some peaks, because of it.
@@patrickroza3073 Agreed at the start, but I normally do min 1h races, so at the end doesn't bother me too much. And yes might have some drops here and there, but barely noticeable. you can find custom engine.ini at RaceDepartment (rd) or Kunos forum under VR.
Wait, how can I push AMS2 at High with 5086k @ 5ghz and gtx1080 8gb? 80fps locked with Rift S.
Interesting video buddy, but man ACC is a mess performance wise..😅
A 10ghz CPU overclock will sort out ACC. Stay tuned for my follow up video in 2065 when ACC is properly playable in VR!
@@SimRacingCorner 👴😂👌
6 sim racing games tested and iracing is not one of them. why ? because iracing is not a game :)
thx for great review. assetto corsa looks amazing.
Ha, iRacing would definitely have been covered if I had a subscription. Assetto Corsa is really stunning.
thats why i spent my money on 5800x instead of upgrading my 1080ti
My RTX 3090 arrives next week and I am pairing with an HP Reverb G2. I’m hoping the equivalent of 120-150% super sampling on a Valve Index means I can run native resolution on the G2 with the 3090.
Doesn't the downgraded FOV bother you?
there is a video of a guy who swapped out his old ryzen 3900x for a 5600x and made a huge difference on Acc and other sims with a 3090
In a perfect world we'd have the beauty and performance of AMS2, the popularity of ACC, the physics of rF2 and the AI of RR3
The AI of rF2 too. ;)
I'll tell you what, that's a great idea for a video right there.
I have the same system but with reverb g2. I have to agree acc is a big disappointment and rf2s ui is painful and graphics too old. Assetto corsa looks good especially with sol but graphics of the actual cars is starting to show its age. Ac2 would be great. It's only going to get better. Good video
Thanks Geoff. The UI in rF2 is a pain in VR, the mouse pointer tends to disappear near the edge of the screen where the settings button lives. AC2 would be good to see, as long as it's not using Unreal of course.🤞
How do these games perform with the G2 with that hardware? I have a G2, 3080ti and 5900x. Titles like AMS2 I have the settings so low, in game and SteamVR and I still get areas on every track that tank the performance so bad, and it doesn’t snap out if it for up to 10 seconds. You can cover some distance in a Formula car in 10 seconds. It’s ruining the experience for me.
IDK why but asseto Corsa feels more realistic even it's successor looks awesome.
Great performance and I thought the CPU-bottleneck will be worse. Still no RTX 3090 available below 2200 Euros in Germoney and I would need this 1k Watt power-supply on top, but no need for 2D anyway. To hell with the bitcoin-miners😠😛
A 850w PSU should be plenty unless you're OC'ing the PC and GPU within an inch of its life. I have a wall plug wattage meter and it maxed at about 560-570 watts playing Cyberpunk and Red Dead 2. A decent 750 watt PSU should be safe too. 570 is well under the 20% margin recommended by PC builders.
Yeah, Bitcoin miners are a bunch of @%^&%$'s.
@@SimRacingCorner Thanks for the info and my 600 watt Be quiet might be enough to power a RTX 3080, which should stay under 500 watt in most tests. But they aren't available either for reasonable prices.
Ohhh Lord i can dream right 😂😂😂
just got me a 3090FE via scan yesterday at retail price. alao have a 5900x to install woth x570 tomahawk. cant wait to setup for the g2
Well timed sir, just in time before the 'Brexit' price hike on PC hardware is about to kick in. I don't see most of 2021 being much kinder for hardware sadly. I pushed ahead with all my planned upgrades at the back end of last year for that reason.
Why not on iracing
Surprised your video memory is so low. I am running ACC with 3090 and the HPReverb G2, and my GPU memory can hit 15 GB.
Same here on 8kx, but it’s all about the resolution.
Same. Was wondering how his vram was so low
What is your opinion on I racing with the Index?
Sorry I can't answer that as I don't subscribe to iRacing
@@SimRacingCorner Thx for the quick reply, I got some money to buy a new PC to set up with a sim rig I have to decide either to buy a triple screen or a VR set , you think its great to play only on VR ? as I'm worried if I played 4 hours he could be exausting? ( FYI I never use a VR ).
@@MAMAMA341 VR is more tiring on my eyes than a monitor. That said I can run VR for a few hours and I'm fine. So it's not what I would consider a problem. VR doesn't destroy my eyes, but it's better to stare at a monitor than VR over an extended session.
@@SimRacingCorner Ok how did you managed to get a RTX3090 I can find any crazy period for graphic cards, also did you managed to test WRC9 on VR?
@@MAMAMA341 WRC9 doesn't have VR. It's just the Dirt Rally games. Unlike the 3080's which disappear within minutes. When any 3090's hit retailers they seem to stick around for a few hours or a couple of days because of the higher price. At least that was the case when I found this in stock last year at Scan.