Panzerfaust 3 VS RPG-7 Anti Tank Weapon

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 14 бер 2022
  • Panzerfaust 3 VS RPG-7 Anti Tank Weapon
    This video you will see a comparison between two anti tank rocket Launchers. one is panzerfaust 3 and another one is RPG-7 anti tank rocket launcher.
    Panzerfaust 3 is made by Germany and
    RPG-7 is made by Russia
    #anti_tank_rocket

КОМЕНТАРІ • 81

  • @M4V3RiCkU235
    @M4V3RiCkU235 2 роки тому +25

    at 900 mm RHA, the PZF 3 is the weapon you wanted. Also, it can be fired from almost anywhere. Don`t know the price - but in urban fighting - T72s don`t have any chance to survive. Imagine that someone fires this from a building, and aims to the top of a tank turret, that is less than 100 m away. Instant fireworks!

    • @TremereTT
      @TremereTT 2 роки тому +4

      Also it's not 900mm RHA but 1125 mm RHA yet 900mm ERA pennetration (in the PZF3 IT-600 variant , the video only displayed the PZF 3-T variant wich had only 800mm penn against ERA) ! The PZF 3 IT-600 was expected to be used mainly against ERA hence the tandem hollowpoint charge in the warhead.
      Also the vodeo doesn't depict the length of the weapon exactly right, as it is depending on the target. If you expect to hit ERA you pull out the tube with the tandem charge. If you fire at light armored vehicles you keep the Tube inside the warhead for an explosion with a bigger aerea of effect.
      I'm kind of a fanboy of that PZF 3 and the Carl Gustaf (Sweden)...
      I like the simplicity, instead of having a bunch of aim prediction and target computing and top penetrators, they simply increase accuracy to hit moving targets by having a fast projectile..and not a rocket slowly coasting towards the target...like with the NLAW.
      Instead of attacking from the top, it's just more designed to overcome thicker armor. No fancy attack angle shit needed. You can hand out a Recoilless Antitank rifle such as RPG-7 or Panzerfaust 3 to random civilians and they won't mess up. And the systems cost under 10000 dollar. A javelin is great for super long ranged attacks, but it costs 170000 dollar per shot, and it's training cost are not included!

    • @markschoning5581
      @markschoning5581 2 роки тому +2

      @@TremereTT
      The Panzerfaust 3-IT was explicitly developed to cope with heavy ERA like Kontakt-5. So it should be effektiv against practically all Russian MBTs used within the Ukrainian theater of war.

    • @markschoning5581
      @markschoning5581 2 роки тому

      @@TremereTT
      About the IT-600 variant, you simply need the DYNARANGE sight. The IT-600 only differs in respect to this. A dynarange sight makes a normal Panzerfaust 3-IT to a Panzerfaust 3-IT600. But Germany unfortunately never purchased the Dynarange sight in bigger numbers.

    • @jankarl7896
      @jankarl7896 2 роки тому

      I have heard that for the German Bundeswehr force one round costs 6000€ per shot

    • @mr.waffentrager4400
      @mr.waffentrager4400 Рік тому

      @@markschoning5581 t-72 with relikt can defeat tandem heat warheads.

  • @mastershake9551
    @mastershake9551 2 роки тому +18

    RPG 7 ammo is cheaper then throwing rocks 🤣

    • @keck4022
      @keck4022 Рік тому

      And?

    • @gunbuckybucketman4578
      @gunbuckybucketman4578 4 місяці тому

      @@keck4022 And that's a win.

    • @keck4022
      @keck4022 4 місяці тому

      @@gunbuckybucketman4578 yeah

    • @Aaronreacher
      @Aaronreacher 3 місяці тому

      ​@@keck4022what you mean and? That's why the RPG is so popular, is cheap, super easy to use to the point a toddler could use it(literally) is versatile and light.

    • @keck4022
      @keck4022 3 місяці тому

      @@Aaronreacher I mean yeah, but when up against modern military equipment, I think quality is more important

  • @timofuchs2777
    @timofuchs2777 2 роки тому +20

    Have to disagree on the rate of fire. If you´re well trained you can switch the aiming device to a new Panzerfaust3 Barrel in under 10 seconds after the first shot and fire again. Since every barrel is a one shot you won´t have to fear overheating while reloading the rounds. Also the aiming device doesn´t wear out over time or needs to be cleaned after a certain amount of shots.

    • @darthtyranus7683
      @darthtyranus7683 2 роки тому

      PF3 is arguably built off an RPG7 with that said its built off the strengths of an RPG7 without most of the cons too

    • @williamzk9083
      @williamzk9083 2 роки тому +2

      @@darthtyranus7683 Panzerfaust 3 (used polymer flake countershot) is based on the 1950s Panzerfaust 44 (uses lead grease counter-shot) which are based on the WW2 German Panzerfaust (uses no countershot). RPG-7 doesn't use a countershot so has severe limitations for indoor and bunker use. The Rocket is maybe the innovation of the RPG-7 but even here the Germans were experimenting with a weapon called Panzertodt that fired a rocket from a recoil less canon.

    • @lordtomlluckrahthegreat9014
      @lordtomlluckrahthegreat9014 Рік тому +1

      But training also applies to the RPG-7. If you train someone long enough, that perspon will eventually be able to fire a rocket every 3 seconds, which is more probable since RPG-7 ammunition is cheaper, compared to Pzf 3 ammo.
      But, at the same time, landing shots on a target with the Pzf 3 requires less skill since the grenade flies much faster and the optics and ergonomics are superior, plus the impact of an individual Pzf 3 grenade is more substantial because it is a tandem charge of higher calibre. So things balance out, in any case.

    • @macobuzi
      @macobuzi Місяць тому

      @@darthtyranus7683 Lol, it was RPG 7 that was actually built off the Panzerfaust 250.

  • @mladenmatosevic4591
    @mladenmatosevic4591 2 роки тому +5

    Old RPG-7 is today staple tool to deal with enemy fortifications and light to medium armed vehicles, but for tanks there are newer and more powerful weapons.

  • @BuckarooBanzai100
    @BuckarooBanzai100 2 роки тому +6

    Heat and Hollow charge is the same. Hollow charge is only the one to one translation from german to english but its still the same. Example: Staubsauger is the german word for Vacuumcleaner the one to one translation is dustsucker.

  • @marcmonnerat4850
    @marcmonnerat4850 Рік тому +2

    In the army, we had to shoot twice on target in 20 seconds, and then change position if alone, but usually engage in tandem. The blast is huge, and the last thing you want is that any remaining tanks shoot at you. Additionally, the PzF 3 is cumbersome to carry, so you have only a few spare units in a platoon.

  • @jameszack7158
    @jameszack7158 2 роки тому +1

    Aselsan CATS vs Westcam MX-15,
    electro optical surveillance, reconnaissance and targeting systems used in UAVs.

  • @hertbrayn5203
    @hertbrayn5203 Місяць тому +1

    RPG is famous but PANZERFAUST is the original

  • @nafisraihan6954
    @nafisraihan6954 2 роки тому +1

    Please 🥺 make vedio about top ten best man pads and there range

  • @k.b1596
    @k.b1596 2 роки тому +1

    Rpg 7 is old and too weak for tanks but imagine if you sit in car and somebody shoots with it at you, you wouldnt probably be alive.

  • @Bjawae
    @Bjawae 8 місяців тому

    yeah, i would hate to carry either.
    trucks are nice, but then there's these.
    catch-22 truck gun.

  • @einfachteshaz590
    @einfachteshaz590 Рік тому

    The Picture is not a Tandem PzFst3.

  • @saibot20194
    @saibot20194 2 роки тому +8

    The panzerfaust outclasses the RPG-7 by any means, it has Soo much better sight system and it's ten times deadlier.

    • @siropensource
      @siropensource 2 роки тому +1

      Yes and lets not forget RPG-7 was developed in 1958, and Panzerfaust 3 when?

    • @sameerthakur720
      @sameerthakur720 2 роки тому

      And the RPG-7 is better than the original WWII Panzerfaust and Panzerschreck.

    • @greatknarloc9835
      @greatknarloc9835 Рік тому +1

      @@sameerthakur720 but rpg 2 was developed later and of orginal Panzerfaust and dont match it^^

    • @mr.waffentrager4400
      @mr.waffentrager4400 Рік тому

      @@greatknarloc9835 the rp2 developed in 1950s is definitely better than ww2 panzerfaust in range and penetration

    • @mr.waffentrager4400
      @mr.waffentrager4400 Рік тому

      You shouldn't forget you can load better missiles in rpg 7 with 650mm tandem heat

  • @DieterRecht786
    @DieterRecht786 2 роки тому +3

    Panzerfaust ist the winner!!!
    RPG is only a Toy.

  • @bdrazic1
    @bdrazic1 2 роки тому +1

    Could u compare RPG 28 and Panzerfaust 3it and than write which are most powerful anti tank weapon ? :)
    German Panzerfsust and French are modernized RPG 7 , also RPG 7 has new versions of rockets which are much more capable ! ;)

    • @defencelearning2785
      @defencelearning2785  2 роки тому +1

      Ok

    • @williamzk9083
      @williamzk9083 2 роки тому +2

      -The RPG-7 is based on the RPG-1 and RPG-2 which were Soviet copies of the German Panzerfaust weapons. The German WW2 Panzerfaust 60 and 100 were semi disposable but re-loadable but it took around a minute and the Soviet Russians tried to make it easier. The Germans also made it easier to reload on the Panzerfaust 150 and 250. The RPG-7 added a rocket booster to the RPG-2 concept.
      -The Panzerfaust 3 is not based on RPG-7 but on the Panzerfaust 44 of the 1950s. The Panzerfaust 44 used a counter-shot of lead filings and grease and this gave it a range of 400m and it made it safe to use in doors (don't stand behind it, it means if you fire in a small room or bunker you won't be blown out). In Panzerfaust 3 the counter shot was replaced by light weight feather like polymer flakes. This makes it safe to use in doors and bunkers and gives it a higher velocity and ability to handle a heavier warhead. The Panzerfaust 3 does have a rocket booster added.
      -Panzerfaust 3 will be replaced by RGW-110 in parts.

  • @celestinoflores6302
    @celestinoflores6302 9 місяців тому +1

    We started bad, panzerfaust 3 cant kill ant russian tank up to T-72 in da front

  • @Andrea-ns9sy
    @Andrea-ns9sy 28 днів тому

    L'Rpg7 è la migliore arma lanciarazzi spalleggiabile al mondo. Economico, leggero, affidabile e versatile.
    Il Panzerfaust 3 è troppo pesante e costoso per il ruolo che deve svolgere.

  • @user-pz1lp8fe8o
    @user-pz1lp8fe8o Рік тому

    Цена РПГ против цены Панцерфауста

  • @sameerthakur720
    @sameerthakur720 2 роки тому

    Poor countries can either equip a few soldiers with the Panzerfaust 3 ...or have the RPG 7 in large numbers.

    • @defencelearning2785
      @defencelearning2785  2 роки тому +1

      Yes

    • @Greekmilsim
      @Greekmilsim 2 роки тому

      Pazerfaust is better

    • @sameerthakur720
      @sameerthakur720 2 роки тому

      @@Greekmilsim Obviously. It is a modern weapon, as opposed to the post WWII RPG.
      But poor nations (who often face enemies with BMPs, T-55s, T-62s etc) and don't train their soldiers much, prefer the RPG.

    • @Greekmilsim
      @Greekmilsim 2 роки тому +2

      @@sameerthakur720 correct

    • @Greekmilsim
      @Greekmilsim 2 роки тому +2

      @@sameerthakur720 like syria for example

  • @luciancotaie8803
    @luciancotaie8803 2 роки тому

    Pg7 vr can destroy a t90 ?

  • @dolezhang9265
    @dolezhang9265 2 роки тому

    Panzerfaust3 is much more stronger than Rpg7 of cause, but price is 20~30 times!!

    • @Greekmilsim
      @Greekmilsim 2 роки тому

      Price it is not significant in battlefield

    • @greatknarloc9835
      @greatknarloc9835 Рік тому

      and Price of a tank ist higher 200-300 times than Panzerfaust 3 :P

  • @arifsulistyorajikin2032
    @arifsulistyorajikin2032 2 роки тому

    👍

  • @augusto8821
    @augusto8821 2 роки тому +4

    Die RPG Ist besser, die können die Russen schneller wegwerfen wenn sie mal wieder vor der ukrainischen Armee flüchten...

  • @FrankLucas-eq1os
    @FrankLucas-eq1os Рік тому +1

    We all know who is the boss RPG

  • @mazzparker7198
    @mazzparker7198 2 роки тому +2

    RPG7

  • @user-cs4ve5xo6s
    @user-cs4ve5xo6s 2 роки тому

    Рпг 7 старая

    • @defencelearning2785
      @defencelearning2785  2 роки тому

      💪

    • @6.6.12
      @6.6.12 2 роки тому +1

      рпг старая но эфективная да и цена в 3 раза меньше чем у Панцерфауста 3 Некогда Панцерфауст3 не выстрелит на 900 метров это бред. Во вторых Панцерфауст 3 тяжелее и перезарядка дольше. Это разные калибры. Тогда уже лучше сравнивать РПГ 28 и Панцерфауст 3 или РПГ 27

    • @user-cs4ve5xo6s
      @user-cs4ve5xo6s 2 роки тому

      @@6.6.12 дешевая старая труха

  • @augusto8821
    @augusto8821 Рік тому

    Alter russischer Schrott...

  • @ginoramirez4290
    @ginoramirez4290 2 роки тому +1

    rpg-7 wins !! is legend

  • @owaisshahturk5088
    @owaisshahturk5088 2 роки тому +1

    🇷🇺🤘🇹🇷💪💪🇷🇺🇷🇺