@@danielle-g3kThe royals and the government would not give him UK citizenship so he was bitter towards them. Would you believe someone who never took responsibility for the actions of his employee’s during this whole situation. Don’t forget, the driver and bodyguard were both employee’s of Al Fayed. The fact that every enquiry came back as a bad accident from 2 different nations should speak volumes.
Well as they say a leopard does not change its spots. What we are now learning about this little man says volumes about his character. Oh btw he allowed a very drunk man to drive that car!
He was a broken man who kinda did lose this son due to the royal family if you think about it...not to mention the inability in government to control the paparazzi, who were truly at fault for creating the whole situation to begin with.
The paparazzi were in France The Royals had no control over them. Plus Diana used to tip them off and tell them where she was, so she created a dangerous dynamic. e didn't wear his seatbelt and got into a car with a drunk person
Why didn’t the royals sue for slander against Mohammed’s claims? It did make me wonder if they had something to hide as you shouldn’t let people stay stuff that could incriminate you.
It's really not in the character of royals to sue. It's only the younger generations, william, harry and their spouses mainly, who like to sue. And suing him would've fanned the flames even more and invited public interest to the story
Never complain, never explain. They take the long view. It has worked out well. Both with Fayed and with Hasbeen and Neverwas. "Give them enough rope, ..."
I believe its true that The late Princess Diana was pregnant at the time of her death. She wasn't wearing a seat belt either. But if there was any foul play. Its organised crime. Not the Royal Family. The Queen is clear so is the Duke of Edinburgh. King Charles also. I say this conviction. From energetic integrity. Not from any conclusive evidence. “Without Prejudice”
Now we are seeing his true character being investigated. A horrible little man.
I think you mean rapist and sexual predator !
this is a fiction work, not the reality
@@Ayoub-y1wshe’s talking about the recent scandal that came out after Al Fayed died.
@@stephenmurphy2212When did he die?
The Dracula British Royal Family
If he thought this would shame the monarchy and Uk government into giving him UK citizenship, boy was he wrong.
Crash with a drunk driver who was speeding...
Once you eliminate the impossible whatever remains is the truth
holmes
The actor who played Mohamed has a really nice voice
All said and done. It was not the Queen but Dodies dad. Feeding the media. Diana deserved better in a husband, in laws and so called friends...
now we know what al fayed was do we still believe his cr*p????
To be fair he still could have been right about the royal family despite being a rapist.
Absolutely not
@@danielle-g3kThe royals and the government would not give him UK citizenship so he was bitter towards them. Would you believe someone who never took responsibility for the actions of his employee’s during this whole situation. Don’t forget, the driver and bodyguard were both employee’s of Al Fayed. The fact that every enquiry came back as a bad accident from 2 different nations should speak volumes.
Well as they say a leopard does not change its spots. What we are now learning about this little man says volumes about his character. Oh btw he allowed a very drunk man to drive that car!
"Would I rather be feared or loved easy both I want people to be afraid of how much they loved me"-Michael Scott the office
Disgusting.....
Runs in the family 😳
Prince William is a good swimmer.
Долорес, как ты меня злишь..
He was a broken man who kinda did lose this son due to the royal family if you think about it...not to mention the inability in government to control the paparazzi, who were truly at fault for creating the whole situation to begin with.
The paparazzi were in France The Royals had no control over them. Plus Diana used to tip them off and tell them where she was, so she created a dangerous dynamic. e didn't wear his seatbelt and got into a car with a drunk person
Princess Diana wrote a letter on how she would die and written Charles as the accuser
She was never the sharpest tool in the shed.
Source?
@1purapericulo it's been widely publicized because she wrote it. She was also very paranoid and admitted to it.
That’s bc a psychic medium that was probably also a leech told her that 6 months prior.
That’s where she heard it, she had no info outside of that.
@@blackpinups Just because she may have written it doesn't make it true.
When they throw Diana to wolves how do they think it was going to end?
Maybe her and her wallet not having a drunk driver as a chauffeur?
She threw herself to the wolves. Whatever was she thinking getting herself involved with such an obviously sleazy character
@@elsabishop7669 And Charles wasn't a sleezy character?
.......what an insane take.
That's like saying "she dressed slutty, shes asking for it "
@@elsabishop7669...also an insane take.
Why didn’t the royals sue for slander against Mohammed’s claims? It did make me wonder if they had something to hide as you shouldn’t let people stay stuff that could incriminate you.
It's really not in the character of royals to sue. It's only the younger generations, william, harry and their spouses mainly, who like to sue.
And suing him would've fanned the flames even more and invited public interest to the story
Never complain, never explain. They take the long view. It has worked out well. Both with Fayed and with Hasbeen and Neverwas. "Give them enough rope, ..."
Use some critical thinking. If they sued him, people would claim they were trying to cover something up
They were damned either way
Their philosophy is Never Complain Never Explain
I believe its true that The late Princess Diana was pregnant at the time of her death. She wasn't wearing a seat belt either. But if there was any foul play. Its organised crime. Not the Royal Family. The Queen is clear so is the Duke of Edinburgh. King Charles also. I say this conviction. From energetic integrity. Not from any conclusive evidence. “Without Prejudice”
so essentially you're just saying random things because you have feelings about the situation. thanks for the contribution 😂
"I believe....."
OK