These jokers absolutely DONT believe that you are a danger. This is 100% intimidation tactics designed to make things as unpleasant as possible for you.
College of Police states: "Taser should only be used as a proportionate response to an identified threat. It should not be used to simply gain compliance with instructions or procedures where compliance is not linked to such a threat, or where a threat has been reduced to such an extent that Taser use would no longer be proportionate." "The term ‘use’ includes any of the following actions carried out in an operational setting: - drawing the device in circumstances where any person could reasonably perceive the action as a use of force - sparking of the device, commonly known as ‘arcing’ - aiming the device or placing the laser sight red dot onto a subject" In this case, they clearly did not have an indentified threat, considering they hadn't even identified the object in your pocket. It seems to me, like the taser was used simply to gain compliance.
As soon as they got these things they started abusing them. Do you remember the officer that tried to taser someone whilst they were climbing down a drain pipe from the 3rd floor of a block of flats? Then there was the guy that jumped over a wall with a hefty drop on the other side. He was tasered mid air and paralysed when he hit the ground.
For the aggravated assault with the taser... I think that was over the top considering he admitted he was only going off a report of a cylindrical object in your pocket and not a report of an actual sighting of a knife. And police wear and use camera everywhere they go but then don't like it when we use them too. Can't have one rule for them and another for us so use your cameras at the front desk. And as for the counter staff... what a moron !
Take away their taser and they'd shit themselves. If you're going to make a claim over this incident, part of the settlement should include matey has to re-qualify every six months instead of every 12 months for the next two years. Alternatively, revoke their authorisation to carry a taser for a minimum of two years.
Another example of why the police are despised. This was an entirely fabricated action by the police and that officer was an absolute clown and completely overreacted. There was never any indication of a threat and he knew it. It was a pathetic attempt to draw his tazer and play the big man. What a psychopath, no wonder he joined the police.
I heard that violence and slave chasing was invented in America. No one else ever did such things. They let them escape if they want in Libya. They never chased escaped ones on that continent. England never conquered half the world, being perfectly innocent.
I am surprised he wasn’t told to spread Eagle. The search is totally unlawful as was the detention and handcuffing. This is an assault and battery with an offensive weapon. Plus unlawful detention.
Post traumatic stress disorder. He needs an office job, it was obvious from his initial approach, has he even heard of the police National Decision Model, or use of force continuum . Any reasonable person( “ a person of either sex not easily excitable or pugnacious” etc,etc,)could see what he was doing, completely over the top. There needs to a full enquiry about exactly who said what in the initial report and what was conveyed to “Taser Man” in the radio message. It’s a clear case of swatting in my opinion. How this person passed his “situational awareness test “ is beyond my comprehension . I could go on with another two hundred words but i will leave the rest of it for others to say.😊.
Listen to the language, high value target. This is something they learn in training. Somebody is putting this nonsense into their heads and they believe it.
Ofc. It's always used as a pretext. What they mean is, we want to take away more of your rights and exert greater power over you, and if you question it we'll say it's for safety reasons.
That was a full-on assault. He needs retraining before he hurts someone. So, when a copper unholsters his weapon/firearm and aims it at a member of the public, doesn't he have to report it? I'm bloody sure I'd report him for aiming that thing at me.
He does have a point stop if you're a police officer and somebody in a baseball hat and sunglasses in winter is walking around a station you have no idea that he's an auditor you're a police you've been trained to think that people hurt other people and they wanted to hurt the police I think what he does and the way he speaks I think it's very well conducted to be fair I would do the same thing
Excuses himself for pulling a taser, based on very limited 3rd party info, implies that you brought it on yourself, spends the rest of the time calling you "my friend". Standard
The third party basically did not exist. That would be revealed by a request for details of the alleged phone call or email etc. detailing this fictitious "3rd party"...
I thought the officer acted professionally, he was acting on information relayed to him by the CCTV operator who saw something in the auditors pocket resembling a weapon - which was accurate. Once the officer had the scene under control he deescalated the interaction, he was clear about why he was searching the auditor and acted well within the law. I congratulate the officer, he acted as I would expect police officers to act - well done.
We pay them to uphold the law, to act without prejudice or favour and to behave professionally. On those grounds there are surely many constables who are fraudulently receiving wages
if they'd said "our operator thought you had a knife", then theyd have an excuse... but pulling a weapon on someone for a "cylindrical object" is fucked beyond belief
Tasers can only be used in response to an identified threat. They can not be used by the police to gain compliance when somebody will not do what they have been asked, especially when the police's instructions are not linked to any threat posed. Footage that once again proves why the British Police are held in such low regard.
I know! Like forgetting the electricity for a moment, I always think someone could easily hit their head when they fall and cause permanent damage or even die. It’s really scary how quick they are to threaten people with them.
@@CatSucurrie they tried to taser someone whilst he was climbing down a drain pipe. The video is on UA-cam somewhere. They also paralysed someone when he jumped over a wall. They hit him whilst he was in the air! This is the problem with arming impetuous, low IQ people.
“does that make sense?”. No actually, none of it makes sense. I would bet this officer has either been in trouble before or it won’t be long until he is…
Well explained officer, perfectly clear. We can't see a recording of what you're wearing and it appears you are 'togged up' as the officer says. Hence the search. Rapidly dealt with, very professional.!
@@marksavage8052 You assume wrong. I did watch the video. Which is why I can't see how he is dangerous. The the only iffy part is when he had his taser out. In these circumstances I believe he was justified and it went fine after he realised there was no threat.
If only they were this efficient when it came to dealing with Wayne Couzens. I love the “I’ve got better things to do” comment when he clearly hasn’t… 😄😄
All calls to the police for any reason, must be accompanied by this sentence, at the end... "And there's a youtuber with a mask filming everyone without consent. He's about 10 meters away from me shoving his camera right in my face"
Richard D Hall investigated this in great detail. He's now been made to pay hundreds of thousands of pounds for the sin of investigating the truth. It wasn't a bomb, it was just a bang. He was ordered by the court to remove all his investigation work from the internet. He was obviously directly over the target, i.e. our lying government.
And we’re all in the kebab shop watch on the Footie preventing EMS from entering an unsafe area but ? ? ? Resign before the enquiry on full pensions 👹 🤬🤬🤬🫵🎃🎃 like they ALL DO when caught 👮🏼♂️💩
Absolutely shocking. I will go there end of the month and record in support of you. Lets see if they wanna try that with me or if i can get you an apology
Along with assault-battery, menacing, false arrest, kidnapping, cruel & unusual punishment (handcuffing), conduct unbecoming, negligence of duty! HE WILL NOT BE PUNISHED nor face any consequences which is how evil operates!
@@Robert-jf5oi Innocent until proven guilty How would you know by looking that he was innocent ? Hanging around the back entrance of a police station for no obvious reason with what could have been a weapon in his pocket. Imagine the blame that the police would have got if he had been a terrorist carrying a weapon that he used when approached by the police The steps that the police took in the circumstances were perfectly reasonable for their and other people's safety. Once the facts had been established he was released from the handcuffs If you were the police then how would you have dealt with it ?
Probably the most narcissistic poloce officer I've ever seen in an auditing video. Not the most aggressive, but he genuinely believed himself to be a good guy. I think the penny dropped with the glasses-cam. His endless cope didnt help afterwards. Watching it online will be painful for him.
You need to watch the London version of this, where a plain clothed Police Officer lied to 2 other Police Officers to literally jump a man with a camera and his friend. 4 Police cars and 11 Police Officers, jumping out of their cars and screaming instructions at the 2 men with cameras. This isn't comparable to the Sweeney from 1970's TV. It's way worse.
I FIND IT COMICAL THAT A MAN DRESSED LIKE A CHRISTMAS TREE IN EVERY WEAPON UNDER THE SUN SHOULD TAKE OFFENCE AT A MAN WITH HANDS IN HIS POCKET. TO BACK UP HIS BEING SUSPICIOUS HE LISTS CIRCUMSTANCIAL EVIDENCE LIKE YOU WERE OUTSIDE A POLICE STATION YOU WERE STANDING WITHOUT A PURPOS AND ANY BLEEDING THING HE COULD THINK OF.
Taser use for compliance College of Policing (CoP) national guidance states that "Taser should never be used for procedural compliance". We identified potential issues with Taser being used for compliance in almost a quarter of the cases we reviewed. We found in some cases that officers failed to identify, and as a result failed to consider, how a person's vulnerabilities might affect their ability to understand and comply with instructions to emphasise never use to force compliance
💯 ... TASER should ONLY be for self defence or subduing violent individuals and on their 4-day TASER course, are they trained in how to perform CPR to restart someones heart and/or operate a defibrillator to prevent blood clots which can lead to strokes or heart attacks ? Perhaps he was carrying his " Cylindrical Object " in a violent manner 🙄
@@philmingnotallowed how do they deal with people smashing their heads on the hard concrete, or the people falling from drain pipes as they taser them from the 3rd floor.
"They saw you with a cylindrical object, so thought it might be a knife" - This kind of confusion is what leads people to try and carve the Sunday roast with a rolling pin.
This is totally appalling! Please, please please take legal action on this one .... Totally unacceptable! WE DO NOT CONSENT TO THE TYPE OF AGRESSIVE VIOLENT POLICING !
@@barrymac4431 Really? I can't see it this time. He was walking around the back of the station with his hands in his pockets. He had no obvious camera and no clear reason for doing this. Plus he was only searched. Yeah, the taser would have scared him but I can't see a claim getting through here. If he was tasered, strip searched and put in a cell for hours then I think he could claim but nothing like that happened.
@@Steven-ze2zk It was aggravated assault with a taser and common assault using handcuffs... I think that was over the top considering the officer admitted he was only going off a report of a cylindrical object in his pocket and not a report of an actual sighting of a knife.
@@PINACI Nonsense. He's an AUDITOR!! He was hanging around behind that station looking for a response. He knew what he was doing. The question is was that response reasonable? Yes. It was. Was he hurt? Was he attacked? Did he scream in pain? No. This will go no further.
@@Steven-ze2zk In your opinion ! I see excessive force. Nothing he was doing at the back of the station was unlawful. And you don't have to touch someone and cause them pain for it to be an assault, although he was handcuffed which caused him pain stated in the video. Anyone can hang around in the street with cylindrical objects in their pockets. Cameras, tube of smarties, packet of extra strong mints, etc. But unless an actual knife has been reported which wasn't the case here then then this search was unlawful.
3:16 - PC 3401 announces 'my camera's on as well' in reply to AA stating 'it's a camera in my pocket' I suspect PC 3401 knew AA was wearing camera glasses from the outset hence the 'professional' behaviour, after threatening AA with a Tazer.
These jokers absolutely DONT believe that you are a danger. This is 100% intimidation tactics designed to make things as unpleasant as possible for you.
I conker with your comment completely, uncalled for and waste of time, cost and respect.
I agree, I have seen that copper in a video before, and he knows about auditors.
@@sharpspencer3234 concur*, but yes, i also agree )))
Good analysis.
Earning the hate!
Officer clueless "I'm not here to hurt you"
Says the guy who's about to taser someone for doing nothing wrong.
Said right before being placed in pain shackles.
Should of said, shut it. if hed been fired at. That would of been embarrassing for the officers 😂
Pure gaslighting
why am i paying tax for these fools
College of Police states:
"Taser should only be used as a proportionate response to an identified threat. It should not be used to simply gain compliance with instructions or procedures where compliance is not linked to such a threat, or where a threat has been reduced to such an extent that Taser use would no longer be proportionate."
"The term ‘use’ includes any of the following actions carried out in an operational setting:
- drawing the device in circumstances where any person could reasonably perceive the action as a use of force
- sparking of the device, commonly known as ‘arcing’
- aiming the device or placing the laser sight red dot onto a subject"
In this case, they clearly did not have an indentified threat, considering they hadn't even identified the object in your pocket. It seems to me, like the taser was used simply to gain compliance.
Do you watch Auditing Britain
As soon as they got these things they started abusing them.
Do you remember the officer that tried to taser someone whilst they were climbing down a drain pipe from the 3rd floor of a block of flats? Then there was the guy that jumped over a wall with a hefty drop on the other side. He was tasered mid air and paralysed when he hit the ground.
Spot on. It is NOT a compliance device.
Wtf. He's unhinged.
Get him off the street, a danger to the public.
Get him reported.
No. He seem fair. They got report about a person with something that could have been a weapon. Good interaction in my view.
Pulling a weapon on you because you have a "cylindrical object" is a JOKE!
Yeah god forbid you might have a bottle of water in your pocket. You get threatened with a firearm.
Well if he can mistake a cylindrical object for a knife it’s small wonder he didn’t think your camera was a howitzer
I thought he was referring to his rat 😂
They dont even have guns PAHAHAH
You need to sue the hell out of these clowns.
Absolute psycho, pointing a weapon cos hands were in pockets 😮 tries to justify it too ffs
dark triad
@@thelibrarian3734well within his rights 😂 you must work for ghe met
Filthy lies
Get a solicitor
Hnk solicitors
Getting a solicitor will pay for itself.
What load of verbal diarrhoea.
Right! ... as soon as he noted that there was a camera though! 🤪
You're a good speller
For the aggravated assault with the taser... I think that was over the top considering he admitted he was only going off a report of a cylindrical object in your pocket and not a report of an actual sighting of a knife. And police wear and use camera everywhere they go but then don't like it when we use them too. Can't have one rule for them and another for us so use your cameras at the front desk. And as for the counter staff... what a moron !
The police are out of control. Why is there zero accountability for these type of actions ?
Take away their taser and they'd shit themselves. If you're going to make a claim over this incident, part of the settlement should include matey has to re-qualify every six months instead of every 12 months for the next two years. Alternatively, revoke their authorisation to carry a taser for a minimum of two years.
@@bluebottle1617 Matey should have to pay the settlement from his own pocket or pension fund.
That policeman knew straight away you were recording.
I should be shocked but I'm not.
Absolute filth.
The GANG BADGE is the giveaway that he WILL abuse our rights .
Glad to see someone else thinks that badge is a gang flag
The worst thing is the met have been told its banned and they still wear it
Another example of why the police are despised. This was an entirely fabricated action by the police and that officer was an absolute clown and completely overreacted. There was never any indication of a threat and he knew it. It was a pathetic attempt to draw his tazer and play the big man. What a psychopath, no wonder he joined the police.
100%
so cctv can see inside pockets ? very interesting
Gareth is a dangerous individual who should never be allowed to have a taser. Can you imagine what he might do if he had a gun. Psychotic individual
💯% mate he shouldn’t be near the public never mind the TAZER 😱 what a 🤡
Absolutely “crucial point” dangerous fool 🗣️🗣️🗣️🗣️🗣️🗣️👮🏼♂️🫵
Seems to be exactly what the police are looking to recruit these days. That and the token box-ticks ofc.
He knows he messed up , that's why he is trying to be overly " helpful " . He needs to be held accountable for his actions 😡
True. When are police ever helpful….
Yes, sacked 👮🏼♂️💩🆘
" GET YOUR HANDS ON YOU'RE HEAD "; idiot been watching to many American cops shows.
John Wayne
I heard that violence and slave chasing was invented in America.
No one else ever did such things.
They let them escape if they want in Libya. They never chased escaped ones on that continent.
England never conquered half the world, being perfectly innocent.
I am surprised he wasn’t told to spread Eagle. The search is totally unlawful as was the detention and handcuffing. This is an assault and battery with an offensive weapon. Plus unlawful detention.
And his name wasn't even Simon 🧐
@@BeadmanLeeottomans
Post traumatic stress disorder. He needs an office job, it was obvious from his initial approach, has he even heard of the police National Decision Model, or use of force continuum .
Any reasonable person( “ a person of either sex not easily excitable or pugnacious” etc,etc,)could see what he was doing, completely over the top. There needs to a full enquiry about exactly who said what in the initial report and what was conveyed to “Taser Man” in the radio message. It’s a clear case of swatting in my opinion.
How this person passed his “situational awareness test “ is beyond my comprehension . I could go on with another two hundred words but i will leave the rest of it for others to say.😊.
How is a police station a high value target when they dont get targetted.....
They really mean we only look after ourselves
The last time I believe one was was over the death of a citizen by a police officer many moons ago.
Listen to the language, high value target. This is something they learn in training. Somebody is putting this nonsense into their heads and they believe it.
1971
Police are not targeted randomly ffs, only if they do something first. How do they not understand that?
Ofc. It's always used as a pretext. What they mean is, we want to take away more of your rights and exert greater power over you, and if you question it we'll say it's for safety reasons.
We have more reasons to be frightened of them, than they have from us. Patronising officer
The calm you’re always able to maintain is seriously inspiring x
Big kiss Brutus 😊
I believe they knew you are an auditor from the beginning. The Police just don't like being filmed. And we all know why.
Yep, for sure - he didn't flinch when AA gave him his email address.
Retaliation for sure.
They absolutely knew you were a auditor, they were trying to intimidate you!!
You can see clearly he’s playing the game. Trying too hard comes to mind.
That was a full-on assault. He needs retraining before he hurts someone.
So, when a copper unholsters his weapon/firearm and aims it at a member of the public, doesn't he have to report it? I'm bloody sure I'd report him for aiming that thing at me.
Me too
That is clear excessive force and sackable. Sue the idiots.
I Feel Sorry for His Boyfriend, What a Absolute Disgusting Animal this Arrogant Copper, But like All Thugs, They will meet a Wrong Person.
Hopefully he’s not a hearing man.
And that’s why the public no longer have any respect them
He does have a point stop if you're a police officer and somebody in a baseball hat and sunglasses in winter is walking around a station you have no idea that he's an auditor you're a police you've been trained to think that people hurt other people and they wanted to hurt the police I think what he does and the way he speaks I think it's very well conducted to be fair I would do the same thing
Ask, Sharon, David and David 😂😂😂😂
@@dumbvedeoz the police aren’t trained, they’re useless
Catching real criminals appears to be out of their ambit !
@@dumbvedeozso wearing a cap and putting your hands in your pockets is suspicious?
100% you have to sue him
Excuses himself for pulling a taser, based on very limited 3rd party info, implies that you brought it on yourself, spends the rest of the time calling you "my friend". Standard
The third party basically did not exist.
That would be revealed by a request for details of the alleged phone call or email etc. detailing this fictitious "3rd party"...
Is it illegal to have your hands in your pockets now
have you met the police's friend? She's called SUE
SUE WHO
@@MaddSteppa2025 sue you
Its funny how nice they can be when they realise they've dropped a bollock
You have to make a civil claim. Don’t let the tyrant get away with this unlawful search.
100% civil claim. And you can add PTSD from being threatened with a taser unprovoked
Not this guy, i dont think he ever won at court or even sued them
@@escobar1656I smell bacon
@@lh-rk3ef yeah, me too, on this channel
They dont care...
They will only start to care when the settlements come out of their own pockets or pension fund.
That dufus was the absolute king of "copsplaining". Loooved the sound of his own voice. Bacon.
Gareth has watched too many American cop films.
Over reactive and nearly Trigger happy!
Surprised he didn’t do a forward roll over the bonnet.
Why would any one want to attack a building full of idiots?
That’s why they get locked in it’s to protect the public from idiots 🤡🤡🤡🤡🤪
The fact that people will be driving past/walking past thinking the police are doing a good job is hilarious 😂
we are just living in brain washed world.
Wow, this is absolutely outrageous. These goons are totally out of control.
Whole cop shop is full of fools. A taser and cuffs all because of a camera definitely intimidation tactics.
Hope the dirty cop reads all the comments
This is disgusting you must make a complaint
more than a complaint, civil suit
About what exactly? Lurking around a police station?
@@marcopaganotto9125No crime in that.
@@marcopaganotto9125 bro didn't watch te video
Yes officer. Any more directives?
I thought the officer acted professionally, he was acting on information relayed to him by the CCTV operator who saw something in the auditors pocket resembling a weapon - which was accurate. Once the officer had the scene under control he deescalated the interaction, he was clear about why he was searching the auditor and acted well within the law. I congratulate the officer, he acted as I would expect police officers to act - well done.
We pay them to be brave. This one looks like a coward.
We pay them because we have no choice.
We pay them to uphold the law, to act without prejudice or favour and to behave professionally. On those grounds there are surely many constables who are fraudulently receiving wages
You're so polite to them after that! This station needs a mass audit. I'd join.
That copper turned his gaslighting up to number 10, he never came up for breath
They made you wait on purpose to piss you off
if they'd said "our operator thought you had a knife", then theyd have an excuse... but pulling a weapon on someone for a "cylindrical object" is fucked beyond belief
Thanks!
cheers mikey
The police clearly throwing the rattle out of the pram - it is getting embarrassing
Tasers can only be used in response to an identified threat. They can not be used by the police to gain compliance when somebody will not do what they have been asked, especially when the police's instructions are not linked to any threat posed.
Footage that once again proves why the British Police are held in such low regard.
That officer is a danger. A Taser is potentially a deadly weapon. You don't just aim it at someone... just because.
I know! Like forgetting the electricity for a moment, I always think someone could easily hit their head when they fall and cause permanent damage or even die. It’s really scary how quick they are to threaten people with them.
@@CatSucurrie they tried to taser someone whilst he was climbing down a drain pipe. The video is on UA-cam somewhere. They also paralysed someone when he jumped over a wall. They hit him whilst he was in the air!
This is the problem with arming impetuous, low IQ people.
My 14 Yr old son has a pacemaker. And if he pointed that at my son for just being near a gate he would have regretted it.
@@ekj24uk Bless him. They act like they’re bloody toys when in reality they’re deadly weapons. Very worrying.
“does that make sense?”. No actually, none of it makes sense. I would bet this officer has either been in trouble before or it won’t be long until he is…
Front counter is a piece of trash like the copper with the stun gun. Absolute disgrace of an organisation out of control.
There's very obvious and deliberate use of delaying tactics to make members of the public give up on seeking information.
Make sure you make a complaint about him too.
Well explained officer, perfectly clear. We can't see a recording of what you're wearing and it appears you are 'togged up' as the officer says. Hence the search. Rapidly dealt with, very professional.!
This guy should be removed from public duties NOW he is dangerous.
Why is he dangerous?
@@madkillermiller I take it you didn't watch the video?
@@marksavage8052 You assume wrong. I did watch the video. Which is why I can't see how he is dangerous. The the only iffy part is when he had his taser out. In these circumstances I believe he was justified and it went fine after he realised there was no threat.
Isn’t that all of them? They are all as bad as each other.
@madkillermiller
What threat was a man with a camera?
hanging around outside a police station with hand in your pockets - massive crime
Don't let this deter you wonderful auditors.
If only they were this efficient when it came to dealing with Wayne Couzens.
I love the “I’ve got better things to do” comment when he clearly hasn’t… 😄😄
Funny how they turn up very quick, but when you call them it takes them hours
All calls to the police for any reason, must be accompanied by this sentence, at the end... "And there's a youtuber with a mask filming everyone without consent. He's about 10 meters away from me shoving his camera right in my face"
Yes just to answer the phone 😅😅😅
How did you get them to turn up?
They dont even bother to do that... They just give you a crime number over the phone.
Its a ploy.. he drew his taser to scare you into the shakes.. he wants to put you in your place.
That would have had the exact opposite effect on me ! I do NOT take kindly to such bad behaviour ! ...
OMG he is the embarrassment !
Well done,you handled it well.
The police are becoming less humane and more robotic, machines carry out any program that's entered with no ifs buts or maybes, 🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧
Another one that's a danger to the public
"CCTV saw you with a cylindrical object in your hands. CCTV saw you with your hands in your pockets."
If my employer told me not to do something then I would refrain from doing so. Just goes to show the disrespect of the offices to their bosses.
Just remember they were warned about the manchester arena bombing 4 HOURS BEFORE IOT HAPPENED
Richard D Hall investigated this in great detail. He's now been made to pay hundreds of thousands of pounds for the sin of investigating the truth. It wasn't a bomb, it was just a bang. He was ordered by the court to remove all his investigation work from the internet. He was obviously directly over the target, i.e. our lying government.
And we’re all in the kebab shop watch on
the Footie preventing EMS from entering
an unsafe area but ? ? ?
Resign before the enquiry on full pensions 👹
🤬🤬🤬🫵🎃🎃 like they ALL DO when caught 👮🏼♂️💩
were / sorry
Absolutely shocking. I will go there end of the month and record in support of you. Lets see if they wanna try that with me or if i can get you an apology
Handcufing innocent member of public is an assault
Along with assault-battery, menacing, false arrest, kidnapping, cruel & unusual punishment (handcuffing), conduct unbecoming, negligence of duty! HE WILL NOT BE PUNISHED nor face any consequences which is how evil operates!
Nonsense
With great respect.. the issue is the TASER !!!!!
@@Bob_Burton It's far worse than nonsense what this cop did to this innocent young man yes.
@@Robert-jf5oi Innocent until proven guilty
How would you know by looking that he was innocent ? Hanging around the back entrance of a police station for no obvious reason with what could have been a weapon in his pocket.
Imagine the blame that the police would have got if he had been a terrorist carrying a weapon that he used when approached by the police
The steps that the police took in the circumstances were perfectly reasonable for their and other people's safety. Once the facts had been established he was released from the handcuffs
If you were the police then how would you have dealt with it ?
Funny how they have cctv on every corner yet when gangs of youths are brandishing machetes suddenly no one is manning the cameras…..
Points tazer
"I'm doing this to protect you"
:/
They didn't think it was a knife, they didn't know what it was, big difference.
Please take this further this pure overkill and unlawful detainment. The met are a fking disgrace
Probably the most narcissistic poloce officer I've ever seen in an auditing video.
Not the most aggressive, but he genuinely believed himself to be a good guy.
I think the penny dropped with the glasses-cam. His endless cope didnt help afterwards. Watching it online will be painful for him.
You need to watch the London version of this, where a plain clothed Police Officer lied to 2 other Police Officers to literally jump a man with a camera and his friend. 4 Police cars and 11 Police Officers, jumping out of their cars and screaming instructions at the 2 men with cameras. This isn't comparable to the Sweeney from 1970's TV. It's way worse.
Need to be sued asap.
Good grief. The 'constable' clearly thought he was in his favorite Call of Duty scene !
The subsequent copsplaing diatribe was painful. What a twonk !
This officer is seriously mentally unstable and should not be in charge of any firearm.
And fired !
No he’s just woke 🤪🤪🤪🤡🤡🤡
@@AGTC009 all regular police officers carry tazers
@@cliffordbuttle4529you’re 100% right. He acted like that dumb Lennon guy 🤣
I FIND IT COMICAL THAT A MAN DRESSED LIKE A CHRISTMAS TREE IN EVERY WEAPON UNDER THE SUN SHOULD TAKE OFFENCE AT A MAN WITH HANDS IN HIS POCKET.
TO BACK UP HIS BEING SUSPICIOUS HE LISTS CIRCUMSTANCIAL EVIDENCE LIKE YOU WERE OUTSIDE A POLICE STATION YOU WERE STANDING WITHOUT A PURPOS AND ANY BLEEDING THING HE COULD THINK OF.
Mass audit of this police station required. All auditors to carry cylindrical objects
AB went there years ago a d they asked him if he was an illegal
Pool noodles
Loves the sound of his own voice thinks he’s very important what a w⚓️
@@clintypda Does Nestle realize that their Smarties package looks like a weapon?
I like how you went from being red dotted to his pal in 5 mins 😂
That patronising officer has verbal bullshit.
I wonder if he talks in his sleep. He’s in danger of wearing his mouth out
Pulling a laser is an assault
He’s not Han Solo 😂
@@derektrotter4287or getting his eyes done 😂
Gareth is a coward, he's actually terrified of a camera. Gareth: I've got 5 cameras..
10:54 oh but he thought you had a knife now, where does the knife come from? the operator didn't mention knife
A cylindrical knife? Like this officer, not the sharpest tool.
If you were deaf he would have tased you he needs retrained
Taser use for compliance College of Policing (CoP) national guidance states that "Taser should never be used for procedural compliance". We identified potential issues with Taser being used for compliance in almost a quarter of the cases we reviewed. We found in some cases that officers failed to identify, and as a result failed to consider, how a person's vulnerabilities might affect their ability to understand and comply with instructions to emphasise never use to force compliance
💯 ... TASER should ONLY be for self defence or subduing violent individuals and on their 4-day TASER course, are they trained in how to perform CPR to restart someones heart and/or operate a defibrillator to prevent blood clots which can lead to strokes or heart attacks ? Perhaps he was carrying his " Cylindrical Object " in a violent manner 🙄
@@philmingnotallowed how do they deal with people smashing their heads on the hard concrete, or the people falling from drain pipes as they taser them from the 3rd floor.
Make Gareth famous. Check his laptop too, that is one weird creepy and dangerous individual.
imagine if you pulled out a weapon on someone because you saw a cylindrical object in their pocket, this can't be lawful.
Plumbers would be extinct 🙈🙈🙈🏴
So they admitted the call came from THEMSELVES.....what a joke!
Wow...he took copsplaining to a new level ❌👮 "Does that make sense"!!
What a disgrace.
How "A" stays so calm and collected among those hysterical and violent gobshites I'll never understand.
They never chase after real criminals; they pick on easy targets, like a man with his hand in his pockets and a camera.
Spot on
TOTAL COWARDS.
And motorists.
*HE WAS POINTING THAT TASER TO YOUR HEAD* Can they do that ?
Monumental paranoia
and not fit for purpose Cop
"They saw you with a cylindrical object, so thought it might be a knife" - This kind of confusion is what leads people to try and carve the Sunday roast with a rolling pin.
This is totally appalling! Please, please please take legal action on this one .... Totally unacceptable!
WE DO NOT CONSENT TO THE TYPE OF AGRESSIVE VIOLENT POLICING !
He will get a good few thousand pounds for this
@@barrymac4431 Really? I can't see it this time. He was walking around the back of the station with his hands in his pockets. He had no obvious camera and no clear reason for doing this. Plus he was only searched. Yeah, the taser would have scared him but I can't see a claim getting through here. If he was tasered, strip searched and put in a cell for hours then I think he could claim but nothing like that happened.
@@Steven-ze2zk It was aggravated assault with a taser and common assault using handcuffs... I think that was over the top considering the officer admitted he was only going off a report of a cylindrical object in his pocket and not a report of an actual sighting of a knife.
@@PINACI Nonsense. He's an AUDITOR!! He was hanging around behind that station looking for a response. He knew what he was doing. The question is was that response reasonable? Yes. It was. Was he hurt? Was he attacked? Did he scream in pain? No. This will go no further.
@@Steven-ze2zk In your opinion ! I see excessive force. Nothing he was doing at the back of the station was unlawful. And you don't have to touch someone and cause them pain for it to be an assault, although he was handcuffed which caused him pain stated in the video.
Anyone can hang around in the street with cylindrical objects in their pockets. Cameras, tube of smarties, packet of extra strong mints, etc. But unless an actual knife has been reported which wasn't the case here then then this search was unlawful.
3:16 - PC 3401 announces 'my camera's on as well' in reply to AA stating 'it's a camera in my pocket'
I suspect PC 3401 knew AA was wearing camera glasses from the outset hence the 'professional' behaviour, after threatening AA with a Tazer.