Sukhoi Su-34 Fullback, Russian Strike Fighter, Kubinka Air Base, JC Wings, 1/72nd Scale Diecast

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 22 вер 2022
  • The Sukhoi Su-34 (NATO code name: Fullback) is a Soviet-origin Russian twin-engine, twin-seat, all-weather supersonic medium-range fighter-bomber/strike aircraft. It first flew in 1990, intended for the Soviet Air Forces, and it entered service in 2014 with the Russian Air Force.
    Seen here is the Sukhoi Su-34 strike fighter in 1/72nd scale diecast by JC Wings. It's a fantastic rendition of this Russian built aircraft that's still in service today. This example is from the Russian Air Force at Kubinka Air Base 2018.
    Thank you as usual for checking out our video, we appreciate it immensely. I hope you found it helpful in some way and if so please throw us a like or even subscribe if you wish to be kept up to date with our latest releases ‪@heavymetaldiecast‬
    Thanks again and have a great rest of your day.
    Cheers
    #diecast #sukhoi #russianairforce #jcwings #su34 #fighterjet

КОМЕНТАРІ • 29

  • @user-jv8zh7gc4u
    @user-jv8zh7gc4u 9 днів тому +1

    This aircraft just looks like it would kick your ass..lol sharp bird and as always salute from a soldier.

    • @heavymetaldiecast
      @heavymetaldiecast  9 днів тому

      The Su-27 line is one of my favourite Ruskie aircraft families. They are big ass birds but can really move around and lay down some pain. Thanks for watching!! 🙂

  • @elijahglasser1421
    @elijahglasser1421 Місяць тому +1

    Very cool and perfect jet

    • @heavymetaldiecast
      @heavymetaldiecast  Місяць тому +1

      One I love these JC Wings Fullbacks, they are a fantastic build 😀👍

    • @elijahglasser1421
      @elijahglasser1421 Місяць тому

      @@heavymetaldiecast that sounds totally fantastic

  • @IqbalKhan-eg9fc
    @IqbalKhan-eg9fc Рік тому +3

    Excellent Multirole fighter and bomber jet with most advanced sophisticated technology
    S u - 3 4

    • @heavymetaldiecast
      @heavymetaldiecast  Рік тому

      Yes it is a fantastic aircraft. Thank you for taking the time to comment and check out my video. Cheers

  • @luriakhsimahk4506
    @luriakhsimahk4506 Рік тому +2

    Lately Jc wings came with very good improvement to their military model. So does this model. Usually they make some moveable part. What about this one?

    • @heavymetaldiecast
      @heavymetaldiecast  Рік тому

      The front small canard wings do have some slight movement, and the canopy does come off. But apart from that I didn't notice any extra moving parts.

    • @heavymetaldiecast
      @heavymetaldiecast  Рік тому

      Thanks again for the comment and for taking the time to check out the video. I really appreciate it 👍

  • @gasparguadalupethecante6377
    @gasparguadalupethecante6377 Рік тому +2

    good day great video, the model is spectacular in any case the su-34 Red 27 (Hmeimim AB, Syria, 2015) is better both are jc wings

    • @heavymetaldiecast
      @heavymetaldiecast  Рік тому

      Thank you. I chose this colour scheme over the one you mention because I had bought an Su-35 in a similar dark colour scheme. So wanted to mix it up a little colour wise as these will be sitting next to each other 😀. I have an Su-30 from JC wings to do eventually aswell 😀

    • @gasparguadalupethecante6377
      @gasparguadalupethecante6377 Рік тому +1

      @@heavymetaldiecast they are good planes I will be on the lookout for the unboxings

    • @heavymetaldiecast
      @heavymetaldiecast  Рік тому

      @@gasparguadalupethecante6377 thank you for your support and time to check out the video's. Appreciate it 😀👍

  • @d4_dawn837
    @d4_dawn837 Рік тому +1

    Do the wheels move on this JC Wing's jet and past JC wings jets you reviewed? Or is it just a still diecast model?

    • @heavymetaldiecast
      @heavymetaldiecast  Рік тому

      The wheels do roll on this model. And they have also been the case on a number of JC Wings models I've looked at so far. But I'd be wary about rolling them around, especially on a larger aircraft like this as they do weigh a reasonable amount I'd worry about accidently breaking it 😀. Thanks for checking out the video 😀👍

    • @d4_dawn837
      @d4_dawn837 Рік тому +1

      @@heavymetaldiecast Not going be rolling them but it is a nice that they can move

    • @heavymetaldiecast
      @heavymetaldiecast  Рік тому

      @@d4_dawn837 Yes its always a handy feature. The A-7 video I did the front wheel even turns. But the JC Wings seems to mostly have moving wheels so far. I'm about to release an F-16I from JC and the wheels turn on that too 😀👍

    • @d4_dawn837
      @d4_dawn837 Рік тому +1

      @heavymetaldiecast how about hobby master's? I am getting one soon and it would also be a good feature if their wheels can roll as well

    • @heavymetaldiecast
      @heavymetaldiecast  Рік тому

      @@d4_dawn837 the last Hobby Master Russian jet I opened was the Su27 at the start of the year. Those wheels did not roll. Yet I'm in the middle of doing a Hobby Master F-111 video and the wheels did turn on that, but the Hobby Master Iranian F-14 I did, the wheels did not turn. So I'm not sure with Hobby Master, maybe the newer releases the wheels are able to turn and old ones are static. I haven't done a date of release on any of those models I have just mentioned though. Or maybe it's just abit hit and miss with them. Hope this answer helps a little 🤣👍

  • @joshjack6127
    @joshjack6127 Рік тому +2

    Can anyone tell me which is better, the JC Wings version or the Hobby Master version?

    • @heavymetaldiecast
      @heavymetaldiecast  Рік тому +2

      Very good question and if I do get a chance to get a hobby master version of this I'll try and do a comparison. I just did a Su27 by Hobby Master which is really nice. 😀

    • @joshjack6127
      @joshjack6127 Рік тому +1

      @@heavymetaldiecast Which would you say is a nicer model based on the build quality, fitment of ordnance etc dude? The JC Su-34 or the HM Su-27

    • @heavymetaldiecast
      @heavymetaldiecast  Рік тому +1

      @@joshjack6127 to be honest I found the JC Wings one easier , as the use of magnets to put parts on is really handy for me with my fat fingers 🤣. And I'm biased to the Su-34 as I really love the camo. The HM one is still a great build and extremely well made in my opinion. But that said I just did a video on a JC wings A-7 Corsair and that didn't use magnets and was abit awkward to put the landing gear on for me. So maybe the magnets is a new feature brought in by JC wings. I'm not sure but it is a good aspect. I think in reality it all comes down to your personal preference really. Both are made well, I can't comment on any inaccuracies to the real life versions. I probably haven't helped much in this reply sorry.

    • @joshjack6127
      @joshjack6127 Рік тому

      Perfect thanks for the reply! You've definitely helped

    • @erjonjoni1434
      @erjonjoni1434 3 місяці тому +1

      JC wings this time. Ordinances are magnetic