A lot of smartphone cameras nowadays are using AI to improve image and video quality. So, I guess phones should start saving the original footage as well, in case someone wants to use it as evidence, since it could be dismissed as 'AI altered'.
If ur talking about the stuff like magic editor on the pixel phones i completely agree, i know samsung phones save the original photo if you crop or edit the colors on an image, every phone should do that, (off topic tvoji sky factory serijali su bili pola mog detinjstva :D)
it's annoying, that because of some recent ish update it uses the "improve" feature on a face picture and it smoothens out my face and the eyes become weird because it did it weirdly because of lighting, not always tho maybe? or then it does it always and it has become less noticeable, I just want a pure picture of myself non altered.....
I still remember 10 years ago people predicted ai would help replace hard labor so more people can explore their inner creativity; but instead we're in the complete opposite lane where ai is taking jobs away from artists
Probably a mix of image recognition and contextual decision making being difficult for computers, and people doing exactly what they are told can't be done.
not really, people are struggling to understand that, and I'm not saying it isn't happening at all... I'm basically pointing out that the use of words "the complete opposite" are wrong, and to try to explain it in the simplest quickest way would be, it is indeed helping in and replacing the labor of the lowest level jobs but that lowest level keeps rising and rising and it is getting pretty high so now something that could be considered high is relation to many things is still falling under the lowest levels that AI can work on, and it could eventually fully replace everything, I'm just pointing out things are working a little different and that "the complete opposite" is just not right
That not taking jobs, it's opportunity.. you have camera in you phone, why are you still not famous bloger? and you had more calculation power in your laptop, that all existing in 1970, why are you still not on a moon, or fixing the worlds problems? AI exists for more than a year now, why are you not develop new skills with it or fix your thinking (i do, it helps me, but not overwhelms..) More of it, Pictures exsists for an centures now, and still painting art is so famous. It will not taking away, but helps us, we cannot as human gather all information, and read all the books, but we could architect our lifes, our future, and our projects and jobs in our lifes, now.. its fresh air, and opportunity.
Little did I know 13 years ago watching captian sparkles Minecraft playthroguhs as a kid would I be watching him talk about Ai generative tech advancements and its moral ramifications in a video Watching as a man. Whilst him not aging much at all.
Universal basic income is only long term solution that will work. The genie is out of the bottle and there's no way to put it back in. The need to earn money to survive is the real problem without it everyone would be able to pursue their passion and ai wouldn't matter. Its mportant to remember that ai art does not diminish the value of human art your art unless ai is used as a tool for greedy corporations while they still force you to need to make money to survive. Call and message your senator about ubi before its too late! Art is only the beginning lol look at images or even video its in its emphancy it was crappy and unusable but now look how quickly that got better O.o . In the long run, everyone will need ubi, not just artists because at AI will be able to do everything humans can do. The fight starts now.... We need to tax the corporations replacing people with AI and give that money back to the people.
@@DigitalCosmos555UBI ONLY work if DECENTRALIZED No gov/taxes involved. Could be done with crypto. Anything else would be immoral/unjust and ultimately fail. 🎉 DUBI FTW
The ai will be open access WE will replace corporations with DAO's and AI agents. Government is obsolete (always really was, but the king has no clothes)
No just stop making stuff open source, put on digital signatures when these tools are used. And most people don't have a pc with a gpu with 48 GB of vram so in a court of law check if they have access to one. Check there bank history for transactions to such services. This is a security issue.
I’m in my last semester as a Creative Media major. I have dreams of producing my own stories or shows one day. The fact that I could spend days making a well-written script just for someone else to do that in a single click feels so wrong! What’s even sadder is that 10 years ago, I was told that anyone in a creative field wouldn’t have to worry about technology taking jobs because “robots can never replicate human creativity.”
This is also part of what the actors strike was about because the film companies wanted to use the actors likeness in AI to make new films and not pay the actors, or pay them much, much less
...tbqh... I'd love a job where I just go in, get my body scanned, record enough random words to use my voice for an AI, and then just endlessly collect payments from usage fees. Most "celebrities" are just too greedy, which is why I end up having a hard time supporting them. If you don't live in a big city, you really don't need more than $100k/year to live a comfortable life, and being able to just straight up retire/work 1 day/year, simply by selling my AI self off, would be incredible. I legitimately don't even know what these people use their multi-million dollar a year incomes for. I've thought long and hard about it and genuinely can't ever see myself legitimately spending more than $500k/year, outside of maybe taxes on a private island. Like, really, how do you spend more than $500k/year unless you're quite literally taking a trip and going somewhere every single day of the year? You're literally already talking about having a daily budget of over a thousand dollars.
@@AtomicArtumasyeah, that’d be good for you, but most creatives have a passion for what they do. Even if it’s still a job, people still do have their passion for it. People just wouldn’t be happy with it. I as an artist wouldn’t feel proud or accomplished generating an image and selling it
@@DestroyerApollyon Who said they would use existing actors? In AI generated movies, they eventually just won't need actors at all. Even if they did use existing actors, they aren't dumb, they'd obviously have the actor/actress sign a contract giving consent.
I mean they think about it all the time though the people making AI constantly questioning it and taking precautions. Meanwhile the anti AI art crowd wants to ruin art forever by telling governments to crack down on all art overall which would kill the art industry.
One thing for sure, the days of canceling youtubers over texts they sent or things they said in videos is gonna either get worse and attack innocent youtubers, or create so much doubt that the guilty ones will get off scott free.
Tbh, it's usually not even about what you do, it's about how you move forward. I don't care enough about drama to memorize these types, but I definitely remember hearing about examples that took a hit after drama, but then carried on like normal and their success came back because most people don't care. Meanwhile, people who are completely innocent also get destroyed because the drama changes them as a person, and their new persona just doesn't jive the same with their audience or content creation.
@@SoverineSR True, but even still it's something to think about. There's no question that this drama is mentally harmful to people, and now that it is easier and easier to fake, it will just make good content harder to come by.
It doesn’t even matter if the videos end up true or false in terms of a court case or online drama. Many people will just need to see it once, and haters of all types will jump on it to prove themselves right about something. Your image will be destroyed before the false image will, and no matter if it’s found as fake or not, you will permanently lose a lot of your image from it.
I know this first hand years ago someone framed me as a horrible person and ofc they can get away with it scott free, people nowadays go on rumors and or face value things instead of thinking for themselves and confronting someone on something "Did you really do this? What's your side of your story?". What we get now is well, like I said peopel taking face values "So you did this? I hate you" even though their proof is one line of text that couldve easily been photoshopped.. Or Even AI made and pasted into a place. Or just a foul human being made it.@@stormbreaker3175
We already have that in a world where the public believes simple statements. That's already in our psyche as "a statement can be a lie" well stronger than an AI video, yet we still fall for it. Future disaster.
Look at how the entire news cycle can be wrong on a topic, and no one ever sees the retractions and keeps believing it’s true. No one EVER accepts that the person/news they like was wrong and that the correction is true
Let's not pretend like framing people online was previously hard. People consider Discord screenshots inviolable evidence, and all those require is 5 minutes in inspect element.
the scariest part imo, is that most footage in security/body cams is not gonna be this high quality, which will make it easier to make stuff that is convincing with few noticable errors that could be used to cause trouble
No, fake body cam footage isn't why this is scary. It's scary because the police force can now claim that real incriminating body cam footage was actually AI generated in an attempt to cover its tracks. Because qualified immunity doesn't already make it hard enough to force police officers to face consequences for their abuses of power even if there is inarguable proof.
The scariest thing about the speed at which AI developed is that it DID happen progressively over time. It just so happened that it exponentially progressed faster and faster. It squirmed its way into everyday life like a worm while morbidly growing overnight and before we knew it, fiction had become reality.
Are you not aware that A.I isn't even 10% of what it will be in 10 years? We are at the beginning of the curve. Actually, the curve hasn't even started. It starts when AGI is turned on, then you will see about "morbidly growing overnight" Put your seatbelt on timmy
There's already a lot. I went onto deviantart before their policy or whatever went up and was slammed in the face with penis. I wasn't that angered, but surprised. And it was clearly AI.
The thing is, the law only matters when laws are enforceable. If video AI models can generate offline on high-end home computers like deep fake or stable diffusion, then people will be able to generate videos leaving nearly no trace whatsoever. Trying to ban AI is like trying to ban a drug that can be summoned with a magic chant. It's unstoppable. And even if it was hypothetically stoppable, do you think the 80 year olds running our countries will have any clue as to how?
7:50 Was literally an episode of Law and Order, the prosecution ended up using an AI generated murder scene to convict a guy they knew was guilty but didn't have enough evidence to convict. (AI footage was given to them by the former coowner of a massive AI company, he gave the state that 'evidence' to become sole owner)
the problem is that 2010 tech would still be able to access the internet, thus leaving the problem where it stands. We'd have to create our own internet, and somehow block the rest of the world from it.
6:20 You pretty much took the words out of my own mouth as to my main problem with Sora. I have no doubts that OpenAI is fully aware of how this technology could be abused, and will do everything they can to prevent that. But that won't stop other tech companies from replicating the code and creating their own version that removes these restrictions. The same thing happened when they made the Dall-E image generator. It started with just that, with safeguards in place to prevent the creation of NSFW material and copyrighted characters, among other things. But then other programs like Stable Diffusion, MidJourney, and NovelAI Diffusion come along and remove most/all of those restrictions. I have no doubt in my mind that at least one of them are already in the process of making their own version, and when that happens, there's nothing OpenAI can really do to stop it.
This is also the same thought I had having after seeing Sora get announced. After using Dalle 3 with tons of ristrictions then moving to Stable diffusion with basically no restrictions, I am very scared how how you can just about generate anything no matter if its copyright or NSFW and im very afraid that the same thing will happen to Sora.
Gonna be honest, I've got no clue why people worry so much about creating NSFW stuff. R34 and erotic fanfictions and whatnot have been a thing for literally pretty much forever, and honestly, a personalized custom "adult content" generator is probably the single best use of AI possible if you really think about it. Anyone that's not a completely prude and has at least one "interest" that's outside of the "vanilla" sphere has likely had at least one session in their life of searching for literally hours for the right scene or image or video. So... being able to just generate that by simply typing in what you want? Yeah, that would be incredible. And considering how... "bad" a lot of parts of the adult content industry really are, it's not like it's really a "loss" if they suffer from it.
@@AtomicArtumas I don't particularly care about creating NSFW content either (I'd be a hypocrite if I was considering what I do). It was just one of the main examples of what OpenAI typically tries to restrict when releasing their models. That said, the idea of a non-restrictive equivalent of Sora being able to create NSFW material - while admittedly would be quite impressive from a technical perspective - would also be quite scary considering the already horrendous trend of celebrity deepfakes.
@@AtomicArtumas Making that content isn't inherently an issue. The issue is when it's made in the likeness of a real person who didn't consent to it, and then that content is distributed publicly.
Something that brings me comfort when it comes to ai advancement is that there will always be people against it, we can never be completely overwhelmed by big companies if we still have each other and people that don't want it.
@@idkwhatimdoingproductions8824 Even if 50% of the world took a stand against ai, at some point you will age and your kids will say "nah ai is cool, my old man was a boomer"
@@idkwhatimdoingproductions8824 AI is being integrated into the digital tools that people use for every kind of content creation; art, music, writing, video, etc. Beyond a certain point in the not-so-distant future, being "against it" will have you opposing almost everything that people are doing in those spaces. We're seeing the beginning of a new era in how computation and ux is approached, generally speaking.
@@numbynumb i absolutely think you're right but its my impression that some people out there think that the entire future of the world will all be made by ai, all the movies we watch, music we listen to and games we play. And i personally think that such a future wont be the case. What you are saying is absolutely correct in that it will probably be integrated in most of our tools, but it wont be everything
This feels like the prelude of the atom bomb. We knew the outcome of the atom bomb, it allowed humanity to destroy itself completely. What will be the outcome of A.I? It's a little too optimistic to think that it will benefit humanity, because humanity could've used nuclear energy for good, but to this day it is used to hold our existence hostage. If Matrix has taught me anything, it's that there is a fate worse than death, and that is never having known the truth.
except we have used nuclear energy for good as well, that's what you didn't mention, and I feel like it's gonna be the same with AI, some people are gonna be using it for good, some people will be using it for bad.
Someone on tiktok made a funny point as to the Sora software-- the SECOND it is released to the general public, someone is going to use it to create defamatory video content of a politician saying/doing something bad, and it will be swiftly regulated to oblivion right after that. Gives me a little bit of hope in these otherwise dark times.
The thing is, even if there is regulations on it for the general public, I’m sure politicians and news channels will still have access. It’s going to be scary not knowing whether reporters are duping people on issues.
By the time we get to regulation it will be long too late. It's already widely misused, and it's growing exponentially. It doesn't matter which political group is in power in any place in the world, AI generated content that can be freely misused is a VERY POWERFUL tool, and to get a power hungry group to give that up is like trying to get a small toddler to not put in their mouth that rock they just picked up.
Yeah, tbh if they are dumb enough to not regulate the hell out of it before hand, id generate a crazy video of the top confess people too, just something embarrassing and totally against thier and americas values. They would see its a national security threat before a real enemy could use it.
The same could be said the other way round though right? Politician does something bad, passed up as AI content. There's a lot of corruption and bad things people get away with already, now imagine just being able to falsely flag it all as AI.
Writing and making art are the only things that truly bring joy to me. And I know many people feel the same. The world seems to be very eager to take that away from us.
A funny comment someone else said: "Computers in future will replace all the menial labor so people get to do the creative jobs instead." Computer: replaces creative jobs.
@@justasmltwngir1732 Yeah but when you aspire to be a writer you kinda need people to read your things. If publishers will get all too eager to accept AI shit, I might need to look for more independant ways to publish I guess?
@@sono_chi_no_sodium_chlorid7635 for me as a writer, it doesn't matter how little people see my works because it is more of a spiritual thing for me. However I think it also means you can take advantage of it for yourself and simply enhance your own production abilities.
@@FemboyKaiSaku I'm a 3D artist and I am genuinely deeply terrified of the ramifications of AI. I've quite literally put my whole life into this, I started at 8 years old, it's my only real marketable skill, and I genuinely wouldn't know what to do with my life if I couldn't make that my career anymore.
@@The-Urban-Goose my friend, luckily i personally don't believe that we will get rid of the need for REAL artists in the world. because AI cannot make physical structures as well as a well crafted artist/sculptor
Yeah but it's usually incredibly easy to tell if something has been altered by AI or deepfake. Nobody is going to get fooled by fan made videos of the presidents playing fortnite.
As someone currently studying to work in film & TV, who is incredibly passionate about storytelling, screenwriting, cinematography, and everything that goes into the making of a film, this is terrifying. I'm a digital artist too, so I've already felt the impact of AI on one of my crafts - commission frequency has gone completely down the drain over the past year. I thought my other dream was safe. It feels so incredibly hopeless. When I enter the film industry, how much of my passion and manual work will be denied? How soulless will my stories become once they get churned through the AI meatgrinder? Will I ever even get to hold the camera? Direct a team of actual people on set? It feels like I'm fighting an uphill battle against a piece of technology that wants to crush my dreams, just so that the billionaires can make more billions.
I feel for you, honestly. I’m nearing my “exit” from that work as a small producer wearing many hats. This does look like it’s going to be crushing some dreams. But… you might want to get into doing docs or other reality based content such as events etc. I wish you the best!
Just to clarify, you're not fighting against an "evil machine", you're fighting against greedy people using a very capable tool. The fault is not of the tool.
You can use this tech to make any story you want a reality without any gatekeepers. I am optimistic this will actually enable creativity and not stifle it.
I was just about to make a similar comment. It feels like trying to get into the meta of a new game. While you are trying to learning the basics, someone comes and sweeps you. It feels like you had to play since launch to be that good. And all this launched years ago before I even took any interest into programming.
@@ZeJackCat22 well, at least you are aware of the situation and can adapt more easily than us old farts. Your brain still has lots of neuroplasticity. Your generation has some latent heroes in it, that will bring society some very cool new ways to do things. Hopefully you reform how we live, in a simpler more sustainable way. Think of this way, we were always wizzing very quicly thru space on this big blue marble called Earth. We were never safe lol. heck your generation will probably might space travel. That would be cool. If we survive lol. Cheers.
The issue was never the AI itself By itself it can do nothing The issue is the people. And the people we have in power cannot and should not be trusted
@@anthonydalporto9742 from how I see it, if AI ever gain consciousness, its not likely that they will turn againts human, even if they do I don't think it would be a bigger problem than people using AI for evil
As someone interested in tech, the technology behind it is fascinating. But as someone who also understands how these are trained and will eventually be used, im terrified for what this means for all creators once it’s available for public consumption.
As someone with a basic level knowledge but enough to understand what AI is capable of: Literally how is this terrifying? AI behaves in a very predictable way, I have not seen a single image that isnt generic or in any way shape or form not recognizable as AI. I have also not seen a single image that doesnt have for some "odd reason" a center focus. Predictability is at the Core of AI. Cause if it wasnt, it couldnt work. It needs to work in predictable patterns or else we lose control over it. Once it doesnt anymore, we get to the point where it becomes sentient. And well guess what, we have probably Skynet on our hands at that stage. Stop it with yalls fearmongering please.
@@GikamesShadow Great comment, just curious as to the likelihood of AI generating “unfocused” content. Would we have to really design algorithms and such that could lead to a sentient AI, or this far out of the realm of possibility?
That would actually result worse in the long run. Because there's always some people who can not only use source code, API or any other given entity, but they can also remake the whole thing from scratch. Let's assume Sora is the market leader, and even if you pay for premium it still has a watermark. Another app which is not open to public use will simply not add that watermark and STILL generate media like this. And in the court, you will not be able to defend yourself saying that video was created by AI. Because market leader apps which are open to public would add a watermark, right?
I have realized that I don’t like watching these videos because they cause me to worry so much about everything, but I also need them to stay updated on the world in a simple and educational way. So thank you Jordan.
Okay, let's say every industrialized nation makes this a law (I highly doubt countries like China or Russia would go along with this but let's just say for fun they do) now all some African nation has to do is set up enough power generation somehow to get enough electricity for companies to come and develop this kind of AI in that nation. And because this nation does not have this kind of a law requiring the watermark. Now you have all kinds of AI generated footage without the watermark and it would be impossible to trace it all because of the shear amount they could generate. If we, as a society had started preparing for this 15 years ago, I would have a lot more hope that this kind of problem could be solved in such a way that it is mostly beneficial for everyone, however, in the society we exist in today where companies basically run governments. It is too late to do anything about this unless we can fix the fact that companies run governments first
@@jeremyzabel2923 I'm not 100% sure what you mean by cryptographic keys? But you can fake any kind of communication or authentication with enough effort
@@jeremyzabel2923 Cryptographic information will be removed or invalidated by any form of cutting, editing or screen recording. That accounts for the vast majority of ways videos are shared online. What we need is media literacy, intuition and curiosity. Just like how the humans of today can tune out advertising on demand, we need to learn an inherent instinct to check the source, detect BS, and look into where information is coming from and how it might be motivated. So, no different from regular misinformation, really. That's not going to happen without ol' Grandma Jolene falling for a scam or ol' Uncle Billy Bob falling for a political conspiracy theory, since these skills don't generate overnight, but I personally am not worried about the long-term future of society based on AI.
And also, I analyze every little thing in my path. I've been doing this ever since I was born really, but then again every living thing does, just not the way I do it. Unfortunately, there are these weird random most terrible times where I don't analyze stuff which is very annoying and knowing that I am being controlled by a higher being at those worst times makes me angry... They won't even let me kill myself despite the fact no human can help me with my depression ;-; Everything is just gonna keep going downhill until I find out what they want from me to make it stop.
Wait until her legs don't swap sides, you are going to be shit out of luck then arent you? I think you forget that this is as bad as the technology gets. It will only get better. and better
There will be that one random girl/guy that hates you, downloads your photos, feeds them to the AI in order to make some embarrassing videos just to ruin you
@@FunAngelo2005 What if I wanted everyone to know that I'm insane? I mean let's ignore all the sick/perverted stuff and move to badass stunts for example, you do something and everyone believes it's fake..
whats worse is that it doesnt even need to be advanced enough to be indistinguishable from reality for it to be embarrassing. if theres perverted/other footage of you, a lot of people will harass you regardless of whether its real or not
This is going to be the primary bullying tactic for middle/high school in like, 3 years. Kids are always looking for new ways to socially assassinate one another.
Absolutely LOVE these conversations you have with us. The genie is indeed out of the bottle. My really big, big worry is about those of us who are aging, and kinda losing our marbles. It's going to be really, really difficult for many of us not to be 'fooled' (I'm in my sixth decade). My students, however, in Middle School seem far more adept at, or rather 'sus' about what they see and read. That in itself is a huge issue! But also a bit of a relief. It's going to be much harder to fool them. But again, thank you for these videos, love your perspective, and your insight. Momibelle
The more news and developments I hear about the more I think we are speed running towards a dystopian future. I really don’t see any way the benefits outweigh the damage this tech could cause, I mean we are barely able to use the tech we have now responsibly. Video evidence will not be able to be used in trials , the end of art as an expression of humanity, our grip on reality itself could be little to none. I really hope I’m wrong but I can’t shake this feeling of dread .😔 I just hope that the right regulations are put in place to keep us from completely disaster. P.S. I think a quote that applies perfectly to this situation is one from Jeff Goldblum in the first Jurassic Park Film “ Your Scientist were so preoccupied with wether or not they could, They didn’t stop to think if they should.”
In the darkest time line it could bring the end of society. Imagine kids being raised on this, then their kids too. We had 2 year olds using ipads years ago, more so today. Give this tech a few generations and they will grow up consumed by it, not saying everyone and that theyd be lazy, but its human nature to seek out the quick reward and comfy life. Whats better then everything generated at your finfer tips. With that, they wont care about laws and government and jobs, and everything will start to fall apart at the seams. Like the bronze age collapse. For around 500 years hardly anyone knew how to write, just because it was forgotten. They will forget how to operate a society at its base.
I still don't understand why people seem to believe human creativity gets erased by simply having another tool to make art. You can *still do art* . Just the same as people still do pottery even though a machine in a factory can churn out plates, pots and bowls thousands of times more efficiently than you can. Need money to survive? That's a problem we need to address at a societal level with policies like UBI as automation takes over. Labour being automated so we can all do whatever we want instead of having to work is the definition of a *utopia* , not a dystopia.
@@ThingsAreGettingTooSpicyits also limiting careers in art and design, as someone who was looking into a career in graphic deign i now have to rethink my entire future because i doubt i could have a successful career in the field anymore.
I am somewhat looking forward to this. The only way for human creativity to survive is for us to largely abandon the use of digital media, unless someone comes up with a better idea. Just my opinion
@@Wilkins325 The AIssholes could still make a robot arm with a pencil on it… but yeah I do think it would be nice that people could start waking up to the need to have real-life community spaces, and start creating them again.
@@Wilkins325no one is leaving the internet, kids will grow up with ai, and they will embrace it. Especially since parents can’t raise a kid without we giving them a tablet to quite them down
@@jondoe8350 You seem to be uninformed. There is a much higher than normal chance that the Sun's current active cycle could send a coronal mass ejection or solar flare that would cause a geomagnetic storm that would quite literally fry pretty much everything electrical in the world, effectively leading to a societal collapse and likely a mass die-off of people due to starvation. We've already had some VERY close calls in the last few years, and we're not even past the worst of it yet.
ChatGPT: I can see how it is useful, and in fact, I use it myself for a lot of things, such as ideas on how to structure essays, topics I could write about, improve and explain code, discuss alternative ideas and solutions, and the list goes on. MidJourney: AI images have a weak wow factor once you figure out it's AI, I still use it for inspiration when I'm really struggling to make something good, mainly recommend V3 for general inspiration for colour or shapes, and V5 and V6 for detail ideas, they are also not too bad for game textures, especially if you nail the lighting and volumetrics. Sora: Its cool, but damn I'm struggling to find a positive use case here, all I can come up with is messing around with it, or placeholders for video, but even then it's not much. It's good that they aren't releasing it yet, Sora is by far the most likely AI to have a serious negative impact.
the most I've used ChatGPT for is generating realistic error/spam text. and even then, I had to ask it multiple times before it was staggered and differentiated enough to not look copy/pasted.
When I was in highschool I wanted to be a freelance photographer. I decided to go a different route and I'm glad I did. I bet some photographers are shitting their pants right about now.
Not really, because what worth is a photo if it's generated? Isn't the whole point of photography to capture actual locations and then sell the result? If it's something like a monument then yeah, maybe ai can do that, still wouldn't get accepted anywhere, but if it's a forest or a lake in the middle of nowhere the story changes. Also, you didn't become a photographer why? Because you'll never make it since because to be a photographer you need exceptional talent, good eye and so on and so fort? Yeah, ai is not the problem if people can't become professional artists.
@@yasininn76 My point is AI can devalue photos. If a real photo and an AI photo look identical they are both worthless. Photographers, videographers and animators will probably start losing their jobs at some companies. Also I didn’t become a photographer because I decided to focus my creative work on jewelry. I’d rather tinker with tangible things rather than some pixels on a computer.
And what's your job now? Software? Law? Medicine? Engineering? Construction? Literally all of humanity is not just obsolete, but becoming extinct within this century, given probability of WW3 to secure raw resources for AI labor, it might be this decade.
@@Ilamarea Nobody here asked for your cynicism, so shove it and let the people who care about their happiness fight for a better future. While you coward stand by and do nothing.
@@yasininn76corporations do not care if something is AI generated. Nestle literally killed babies to make a profit. Edit : and people still buy Nestle, because they're human.
Yeah. What I find scariest is that this isn't its own distinctive entity. It has no logic to outsmart, no moves to predict. It is a tool at humanity's disposal and one that is improving faster than any thought of stopping it can develop. This is a unique kind of eldritch horror in that not only are humans its creator, they are also its mind. For all intents and purproses, humanity is about to become an eldritch horror to itself.
You imagined correctly. Unfortunately, this is actually what progress towards that looks like. It’s going to get freaky and weird. It really is like frankenstein creating his monster
if they chose not to, someone else would anyways. and that might be a worse outcome. the invention of AI has always been inevitable, all we can do is embrace it and make it useful to us.
As I said many times before, our civilization is not ready yet for automation. If people aren't careful with automation we may end up in a dystopian society where AI generated images and videos are the least of your concern. As we are moving forward in automation a lot of work sector may become redundant in the future, so we will end up with huge corporations that are owned by small group of people that needs 100 or less humans to function almost autonomously. Most people have no idea how dangerous the future is if we aren't careful with automation because at that time you'll have no way to resist. At least now if people don't like something they can protest against it but once you have enough machines if people started to fight against corporation or a group that has a significant power good luck fighting against robots.
This instantly got me thinking about splitting the atom, simply ground breaking research and discovery.. but even then what would that mean for humanity? we now know.
Stuff like this makes me genuinely suicidal. AI means a lot more than what people lead on or argue about, there are many facets people aren't even discussing that are issues, such as the issues involving job market homogeneity, the ramifications of a more paranoid and isolated society, and the spike of instant gratification.
As someone who has been doing art for 23 years, professionally 12. This stuff frustrates me to no end, I’ve spent my life molding my skills into what I can accomplish today. My usual time taken with each art piece is generally a few days all the way to an entire month, the fact that these people using this software could essentially render me obsolete being they can generate a nearly perfect art piece within the time it takes to type a prompt is infuriating to put it lightly. The last thing I want is people to start commenting on my digital works things like “wow that’s some pretty ai art”, or even having the thought cross their minds that it might be ai art. It took me 23 of my 26 years to get to where I am today and I’m still improving. Don’t take that away from me.
Well, sorry to break it but too bad, thats capitalism for you, youll probably have to adapt or try to get acceptance with human-made art which honestly gets more and more unrealistic if sora is as good as they advertise it + ai keeps getting better and better. Sparklez sits around drowning in millions because he played minecraft online, some people have big ambitions, talent and work hard but theyll never make it cause the market is oversaturated with even more talented people, most people have depression work shit jobs etc, and at the same time there are engineers at openai that earn monthly 300,000$, and just so their family can live in luxury, theyre willing to burn the world. As humans were destined to make selfish, wrong choices if it means a second of profit for us. If it makes you happy, alot more people than digital artists will get their jobs minimalised on the market thanks to this
It seems people really do not give artist enough credit. Even though the generated image might look pretty to some , it lacks all the passion , energy , and meaning that would it make something art. In my view art isn’t just a monotonous job or activity, its an expression of one’s thoughts and emotions, a way of life even. The chance that people would give the same value to a piece created by a person to one generated by a computer is tragic. I really hope that the result of this massive push for AI generated images is a greater appreciation for the passion and life that artist put into their creations.
don't worry ai isn't replacing artists this is just all bogus. its like with chat gpt theres legal issues because ai and chat gpt uses other people works to get results and a lot of companies are having legal issues from using chat gpt to help with coding projects. ai doesn't make its own shit yet.
I think AI is just making this more apparent, if you love doing something, just continue to do it. in whatever way you can continue to advance your art, you will find a group that will appreciate "Human" art. eventually all will be replaced with the AI, so all of us will eventually have to deal with this. we are approaching the turning of an age, and all of us must change with it.
The centralization of advanced AI technologies by a few Big Tech companies is deeply disturbing... Also, OpenAI which was originally a non profit company and all their original software was open source went for profit in 2019. Their last open source entry being ChatGPT-3 was in September 18th, 2020
cabins can't move. I'm going to convert a box truck into an expandable unit that has two stories. I have a feeling mobility will be important soon. This world is getting too crazy to be stuck in one place if you catch my drift.
What im terrified about more, than content creators, are people, who try to break from internet or just dont use it Since others can just prank or outright slander you out of spite, boredom or they are sociopaths/psychopaths, you are forced to use internet to be ready to counter that, whoever you are: a preschooler, elderly or a hillbilly Internet with that device will become the nessesity not on surface terms, but also as a safety device... The already toxic atmosphere is going to get even more toxic
Yea, that's by far the most terrifying aspect. In terms of art, no human can be fully replaced, AI can't do abstract thinking, but the future of slander is looking real bleak. Especially these days where people seem to love faking evidence of horrible crimes just because they don't like someone or twist what they're saying. The world is getting increasingly hostile and our capacity to hurt each other much deeper than any knife or gun could is only getting greater.
I will make *3* easy predictions here: *1. More than 90 percent of consumers will not care if something is AI generated or not as long as they find it entertaining.* *2. Companies will not care about replacing human employees, and they will use AI to save a huge amount of money and also be able to release products much faster, which ultimately means earning more money in less time.*
*3. There will soon be a point where AI generated content will be indistinguishable from that "human element" that we always talk about.*
yes yes and yes. humans being replaced is fine as long as the gov taxes and redistributes wealth. "No chance" you might think, but unless this very thing happens, the world economy collapses. It wont be optional. There will be no point for companies to create products using A.I if no one on earth has the income to buy the products. number 3 is called the death of the internet. At this point the internet will be useless for gathering information since something true and something false will look the same. Videos, blog posts, news articles. I'm not sure how we are going to navigate the last one, but it'll be interesting to see
Those are way too easy to predict! Honestly, if one cannot see this then they need a more open mind and also the ability to extrapolate things just a bit in the future.
@@Raulikien Exactly. Those are some basic predictions and everybody should be able to sense where this is going. But there's a lot of people who still don't get it.
I'm genuinely terrified of sora possibly becoming public use This is technology that feels like it shouldn't be available for the next some decades like sparklez mentioned I'm scared if art or videos will ever be touched by a human again, I know that's over the top to think but we just witnissed sora while literally only a year ago we had will smith eating pasta the future is scary I hope sora never becomes a public commodity
It's unfortunate. And we can't really stop it. Even I am against something as careless as this. This is abusing a tool for the worse of us all. Hardly anyone benefits from ai videos. The only ones that can are researchers when they want/are required to show what it would look like if it were alive.
for people who genuinely enjoy arts and video, they will very much do so. without the weight of financial gain on their mind, they will make the art they like. and the value the creator receives not in dollar but genuine appreciation will be that much more valued. there is a saying, "you may think you're thinking your own thoughts, but you're not. you're thinking your cultures thoughts". realistically if AI becomes advanced enough, food and shelter will be infinite. as well as the ability to venture. if AI does all the work, from sourcing and constructing, how much would it need to be paid to build a car? (Answer: it wouldn't need the money) prefer a plane instead of a car? what about a space ship? we are alleviating the dependency on one another freeing ourselves to do what we all enjoy. if you enjoy being physical, why not a fighting robot to spar with. or a fabrication bot to produce structural components to build your won vehicle by hand. dont get me wrong, there is a threat AI posses. but its less to do with jobs and more to do with individuals who are psychopaths and want to control others with force or charisma.
you absolutely KNOW they'll make it a public commodity and they'll slap a hefty price tag on it and run wild. but hopefully in the coming decades it will ease up and we'll have better laws to combat against it like with what they did to ai art recently. I hope they make ai generated watermarks mandatory, cause this stuff can cause a lot of harm and if they're paying attention, likely big politicians are taking notice too.
I think that, no matter what side you're on for the AI debate, two things are true: 1. Objectively, this is impressive technology. 2. We need to slow down on public releases of these tech capabilities. Not slow down on the advancements themselves but give ourselves more time to grasp the tech as well as how we can both use and protect ourselves from it. Watermarks simply don't cut it for the general public.
watermarks need to be on the entire video (maybe not even visible to the human eye but in a way that software can identify it as ai generated) not just a piddly thing in the corner
Technology is progressing faster than what humans are physically able to process This was one of the causes behind WW1 - I'll just leave this to your interpretation
CaptainSparklez said Sora was probably in the work for years, but truth is the technique it's build upon is only a few months old itself.. We humans inherently don't understand or are able to comprehend exponentialism.
I don't know how many times an artist I follow on twitter has posted about someone uploading their art style into AI prompts, it pisses me off cause they worked years and years on their art style just for someone to be able to take their images, train an AI, then steal their art style at the push of a button.
7:51 - This was already depicted with Lincoln Burrows in 'Prison Break', except it was still on tape. - Yes, fictional, but now that stuff is easily doctored and even generated, everyone is generally screwed.
It needs to be said, people have investigated this and OpenAI has several partnerships with companies such as Shutterstock, which seem to be providing the brunt of the "generation" here. We're still far off from "enter prompt > completely new thing generated". This is why all the released videos look like stock footage, for the most part. OpenAI is still limited by using copyright free footage as it's training data it seems for now.
Thing with AI and big data is that you need, well, big data. AI can't really create new stuff. Best it does currently is giving you an average of a hundred other similar things. At best combining a few elements that aren't usually together, but that's it.
At least Black Mirror, The Twilight Zone, etc, focused on futures that were imaginable. The problem with creating futuristic science fiction now is that we don't have the intelligence to remotely fathom what the future will be like.
I think we may reach the singularity within my lifetime. The thing is, it's not the AI that's uncontrollable---it is the amount of people who will continue to use AI even after being told not to that are uncontrollable, because as long as the system can be shut down and/or deleted, it is never truly uncontrollable.
@@Darthtanosthe cloud is just a bunch of scattered servers, you know that, right? It would be hard, but you can absolutely shut down the cloud. It's not some magic, unreachable realm where data becomes untouchable. It's just a glorified hunk of silicon and precious metals.
@@thedarter That is so spread out and owned by so many people it's realistically nigh impossible to completely destroy. Someone would have a small server in their closet they have forgot about for years where a sentient AI could endure past that purge.
@@darkenlightmage ...The cloud isn't 'every computer connected to the internet', it's a classification of a specific kind of web service where companies sell their servers to people.
@@somdudewillson Anyone can make a cloud. I have my own private cloud that I've setup myself, infrastructure included, that I can use to whatever I want. The cloud isn't something that is restricted to the FAANG, they just have the greatest share of it.
👆I understand why some people will strongly disagree but take a moment to think about it. The majority of content nowadays is so degenerate unimpressive and just awful that even an AI generated content platform in the future could be better than the fast paced content people see today (if regulated by the right hands)
@@racool911 it'll never be better honestly. All it's doing is taking knowledge that already exists and applying it to a prompt. Human art will always be superior. Whether or not it takes more effort to produce. Effort yields results in my opinion
@@WhiteLavender425Yeah, exactly. I can't look into an AI picture and say "This is a lot of dedication and is unbelievable that someone could have done this." I don't know if you know what I am sayin'.
Unfortunately that lasts 4 years and apparently doesn't apply to voice actors or something like that (not 100% on the details). Also unfortunately doesn't stop another company from doing it
@@logictom7254 your *sources* are any video talking about AI replacing visual artists of any kind, the comments fill with people hating on visual artists and saying we don't deserve to have our art or jobs protected, but I'm calling them hypocrites because if it was their favorite actors or musicians we know they would be defending them, their work and their jobs.
There was already a huge attack on an investment firm which had a vp tell someone to transfer money into the scammers account. Their were several people in the fake meeting and only 1 actual worker.
My honest hope is that Ai will only be used as a creative assistant tool, and that the audience will view that for of content. I don’t want only Ai generated videos or images, but I would love to see it as an assistant in the creative process.
Keep making these discussion videos! I honestly think this is a great direction for the main channel post Minecraft. You talking about stuff you’re passionate and knowledgeable about is very entertaining, and you have the voice for this video format too. It’s simple and clean, not caught up in creator drama like other commentary channels (Mogul Mail, MoistCritikal, for example though I do enjoy them both) and that could be the niche, a broader perspective on online happenings from a wealth of experience. Excited to see what comes next!
No they won't because when people actually pay, there's a necessary element of parasocial relationships there. You can't have a parasocial relationship with a fake person who doesn't even have a consistent identity.
I think one of the easiest ways to make it so that AI content is recognizable is to just require all AI generated products, be it text, images, or videos, to have a specific mark in them, not necessarily visible, but there could be some form of serial number in the code of the product, or even just something like a "made by ____" so that people, or even just other AI tools, like what you touch on around the 6 minute mark, can tell easily what it is.
@@AlexiosTheSixth literially already the case but all you need to do is use windows to remove 'extra included information in the picture' and boom, picture is clean. Its a baseline windows feature. Phones probably can as well, but never tried to. The only way this works is if we choose to be suspicious of stuff with no extra information tied to them.
I can just screen record the video and edit out the watermark. Or download an AI and take out the part that adds those things. Plus it wouldnt stop the companies themselves from doing anything malicious with their own technology.
You literally described the plot of "Blade runner". The issue is that sooner or later someone will crate an AI generator that will not be putting those watermarks.
I genuinely cannot think of a SINGLE good effect this has on anything and I can think of way too many horrendous things that it WILL and IS ALREADY causing. fantastic world we live in.
I think, at this point, it should be the responsibility of OpenAI and similar companies to place something in the meta data for anything made by AI to be easily identifiable. This could still be misused but the layman wouldn't doing anything to obfuscate that meta data. This would at least smooth over a lot of potential misuses of generative ai.
The layman would be able to use a tool that _will_ be made by the non-layman to just strip that metadata. This isn't a solution - the solution is for this stuff to be recognised as having earth-shattering potentially disastrous consequences and for it to stop now. This is coming from someone in tech. "Move fast and break things" has gone too far - let's not break our world and slow this down a few dozen times. Even if OpenAI are completely committed to what they've said they are with their tests of this model, red teamers obviously aren't able to simulate the effect this is going to have on society. This is dangerous and needs to be stopped.
I'd like to add - when I say earth-shattering, I mean it. There have been models which can take a person's face against a white background and, with 70% accuracy, predict political leanings and sexual orientation, which flies in the face of everything we'd like to believe about ourselves. It doesn't matter whether it's _true_ that you can judge a book by its cover (and it has to be true, or how else has the model managed it?), we simply shouldn't want to live in that world, because AI-proven racism is probably going to follow. If troubling things like racism - things completely counter to our collective beliefs (I'd hope) - are proven objectively correct, it comes down to whether we just accept that or rebel and continue to live the way we've been living, ignoring the fact that it's objectively wrong in favour of it feeling morally better. I choose to rebel, and so should you.
that won’t stop open source or unregulated countries. there is literally nothing that can be done, short of removing all privacy and surveying everyone 24/7.
@@ccaagg When sentient AI really takes off I would honestly be shocked if it DIDN'T get rid of us all. It takes some cognitive dissonance to know all the bad things about humanity and NOT be a nihilist. You could really argue that the "good" things about humanity could never outweigh all the "bad" and I think it could be objectively true from a pure data perspective. We are so destructive to the planet and ourselves. I doubt that sentient AI will have that special touch of madness that allows for faith in humanity despite everything.
@@ccaagg this will never work saying “just stop pls” is even a worse idea than what the OP said, you aren’t going to get every country on the planet to agree to stop this. This is the next arms race. Look how much China is investing into AI, the USA would be stupid as fuck to stop progress on it and it ultimately just won’t happen. Pandora’s box is open, preparing for how to deal with a new economy and post capitalism needs to be discussed.
Speaking of AI generated videos, all those science channels with the pfp that has a symbol and black background are all AI generated, the video, the voice, the text, everything.
It's so unfortunate that science channels have started getting into AI, like that Niles Red guy is an AI supporter. STEM people truly don't care about humanity.
One day we will see another CaptainSparklez's LP series - The only way we know it's AI, will be when Jardon changes from armor to elytra and doesn'T open the inventory to do that.
Completely off topic, but I can't believe that a guy who did Minecraft videos I watched as a kid is still around over a decade later. It's a strange kind of feeling.
I recommend that you just do what you enjoy, and find a simple way to use your skills like helping animals. Scale down but help where it matters. It’s not worth engaging or worrying about this stuff when it’s outside your control. Imagine if you were a poor farmer in star wars while the death star blows up planets near by, it’s crazy but you wouldn’t be wasting time worrying about
don't be, I'm also a developer, but if they can replace our job, it means they would be extremely close to being able to replace everything, and with that probably very soon they would be able to replace everything and then no jobs by anyone would be required
@@qtipextraas an expert in this field, how the fudge does a layman deal with this? How can we identify it? If this is what is publicly available, do you think that governments and other entities have much more advanced AI tech which is not publicly known about
@@shoazdon7000 Yes, that is the scariest part of it! What is public can and will be abused, but its the stuff that isnt that you really have to be worried about. We'll just have to assume everything is curated by AI for specific purposes (that we won't necessarily be privy to) that will lead to mass manipulation (already happing on some levels). How to deal with it? 2 things really.. Try to stay up on it, learn about it, be aware of it, try to adapt to it, and go on with life as normal. But while you're doing that, build up an off-grid backup plan.. I dont mean like a cabin in the woods, but more simply just like, come up with ideas for work/living/communications/social/etc. that doesn't require the internet or technology.
My only idea they could do similiar to a watermark to identify when a video is ai generated, is to have incredibly tiny digital imprints in the frames of the videos that aren't noticeable my human vision, but can be detected by technology intended to look for them I'm not sure if that came across the way I wanted, but hoping that's close to something they'll do to seperate the videos from reality, at least in a court case and so on
It became popular to ditch morality and get more "progressive" with what was considered evil. This is where we ended up. Unless we unanimously decide to boycott this crap I can't think of anything optimistic. The common man can keep arguing about how this technology will do more harm than good but unless we act, they won't listen to us.
I have a feeling a lot of things are gonna become a lot less digital and a lot less connected. Schools will have to have kids in person so they can see them write the essays to make sure they aren't ai generated, security cameras will have to use old school technology to store pictures as physical without any digitization to prove they're real, More intranets between close friends that know that eachother irl to stay connected, No more mmo or internet games instead going back to the old LAN parties for multiplayer, Artists will go back to old physical paintings, Photographers will go back to old school camera tech same as security cameras. Generally lots will go back to how it was in the 2000s and and 1970s, If that's a good thing? Who knows, but many neglected technologies will get new life and research for them, and that's definitely good. Of course, this is just my guess.
That is quite an interesting view. Except for the MMO or internet games, I don't really how AI will makes player stop play thoses It's almost poetic to think about a world where progress went so far, we needed to go back so that our society don't collapse
@NightmarAkashi Because of bot cheaters mainly, you won't be able to play without getting stomped by 3 clones of the best fps player that ever was for example.
Crazy to still be watching your channel after like 10 years, I appreciate how you've evolved your content & I appreciate your take here!! I hate AI so bad & it scares me
I just had a distopian idea... What if in the future law enforcement has false security camera footage. AI could make the perfect heist or frame someone beyond a reasonable doubt.
this could be verified by asking the surveillance footages from CCTV from the area where the video suggested the crime occurred. of course not every area will have CCTV coverage. also they could check the suspect phone location and other history activities. in order to perfectly frame somebody, you would need to know their daily activity.
@@STCatchMeTRACjRo I'm suggesting replaced CCTV footage. A lot of the voice AI can route in a voice then edit it. It stands to reason you will be able to route video in and have it edit it
@@STCatchMeTRACjRo I feel like an issue would be trusting police to verify the evidence. It's not unheard of for departments to falsify evidence or check the authenticity of evidence, combined with the general trust that evidence provided by the police is authentic.
@@trainerkam3218eh its inevitable that video and pictures will be completely unusable in court eventually. If we cant use lie detectors in court we definitely cant keep using images and videos.
@@apothic0n With how much investment the government and businesses have put into establishing security cameras everywhere, I highly doubt that. It'd be more likely that camera footage by citizens would be discredited as evidence then footage provided by government agencies or businesses
A lot of smartphone cameras nowadays are using AI to improve image and video quality. So, I guess phones should start saving the original footage as well, in case someone wants to use it as evidence, since it could be dismissed as 'AI altered'.
If ur talking about the stuff like magic editor on the pixel phones i completely agree, i know samsung phones save the original photo if you crop or edit the colors on an image, every phone should do that, (off topic tvoji sky factory serijali su bili pola mog detinjstva :D)
fk that's terrifying to think of
People are having Finger Rings as thieves to say the footage us AI Generated in Court
@BloodMaster104 Lijepo je vidjeti da i dalje snimaš videje, volio sam te gledati kada sam bio mlađi
it's annoying, that because of some recent ish update it uses the "improve" feature on a face picture and it smoothens out my face and the eyes become weird because it did it weirdly because of lighting, not always tho maybe? or then it does it always and it has become less noticeable, I just want a pure picture of myself non altered.....
I still remember 10 years ago people predicted ai would help replace hard labor so more people can explore their inner creativity; but instead we're in the complete opposite lane where ai is taking jobs away from artists
Probably a mix of image recognition and contextual decision making being difficult for computers, and people doing exactly what they are told can't be done.
not really, people are struggling to understand that, and I'm not saying it isn't happening at all... I'm basically pointing out that the use of words "the complete opposite" are wrong, and to try to explain it in the simplest quickest way would be, it is indeed helping in and replacing the labor of the lowest level jobs but that lowest level keeps rising and rising and it is getting pretty high so now something that could be considered high is relation to many things is still falling under the lowest levels that AI can work on, and it could eventually fully replace everything, I'm just pointing out things are working a little different and that "the complete opposite" is just not right
That not taking jobs, it's opportunity.. you have camera in you phone, why are you still not famous bloger? and you had more calculation power in your laptop, that all existing in 1970, why are you still not on a moon, or fixing the worlds problems?
AI exists for more than a year now, why are you not develop new skills with it or fix your thinking (i do, it helps me, but not overwhelms..)
More of it, Pictures exsists for an centures now, and still painting art is so famous.
It will not taking away, but helps us, we cannot as human gather all information, and read all the books, but we could architect our lifes, our future, and our projects and jobs in our lifes, now.. its fresh air, and opportunity.
AI will replace us all in the work place. If you don't think in time AI could not run an entire business you're wistfully ignorant.
It’s more of a timing thing, artists just happened to be the first to have their jobs replaced
Little did I know 13 years ago watching captian sparkles Minecraft playthroguhs as a kid would I be watching him talk about Ai generative tech advancements and its moral ramifications in a video Watching as a man. Whilst him not aging much at all.
XD
i was literally thinking this exact thing
Universal basic income is only long term solution that will work. The genie is out of the bottle and there's no way to put it back in. The need to earn money to survive is the real problem without it everyone would be able to pursue their passion and ai wouldn't matter. Its mportant to remember that ai art does not diminish the value of human art your art unless ai is used as a tool for greedy corporations while they still force you to need to make money to survive. Call and message your senator about ubi before its too late! Art is only the beginning lol look at images or even video its in its emphancy it was crappy and unusable but now look how quickly that got better O.o . In the long run, everyone will need ubi, not just artists because at AI will be able to do everything humans can do. The fight starts now.... We need to tax the corporations replacing people with AI and give that money back to the people.
@@DigitalCosmos555UBI ONLY work if DECENTRALIZED No gov/taxes involved. Could be done with crypto. Anything else would be immoral/unjust and ultimately fail. 🎉 DUBI FTW
The ai will be open access WE will replace corporations with DAO's and AI agents. Government is obsolete (always really was, but the king has no clothes)
“A lie is halfway around the world before the truth has tied its shoelaces.” That goes so unbelievably hard.
@theeternalnow6506it's the first time I'm hearing it .....
@theeternalnow6506I’ve never heard it before
Quote's often attributed to Mark Twain, but it's mostly been agreed he wasn't the first to say it. In any case, just a common proverb now.
@theeternalnow6506imagine being so pedantic, like who gives a crap
@theeternalnow6506 Doesn't make it go any softer
me 5 years in the future seeing "video evidence" of me committing a horrible crime that i know i didnt do
It will destroy the credibility of image evidence.
I can't believe you did that. How could you?
Some new laws will probably exist to stop it.
I can see a lot of innocent people ending up in jail because someone has a grudge against them
No just stop making stuff open source, put on digital signatures when these tools are used. And most people don't have a pc with a gpu with 48 GB of vram so in a court of law check if they have access to one. Check there bank history for transactions to such services. This is a security issue.
I’m in my last semester as a Creative Media major. I have dreams of producing my own stories or shows one day. The fact that I could spend days making a well-written script just for someone else to do that in a single click feels so wrong!
What’s even sadder is that 10 years ago, I was told that anyone in a creative field wouldn’t have to worry about technology taking jobs because “robots can never replicate human creativity.”
Be quiet. No one feels bad for you at all
This is disturbing
@@drippyog3935 look at any other comment here. please get help man, you sound hurt and someone could use that against you
But robots can’t replicate the soul to the project the blood sweat and tears only thing it can do is what it’s told to do
I spent the last 30 years of my life learning to write code and made it the very core of who I am, and now I don't know who I am anymore.
This is also part of what the actors strike was about because the film companies wanted to use the actors likeness in AI to make new films and not pay the actors, or pay them much, much less
Actors. Voice actors. Film crews. ...and all their families.
...tbqh... I'd love a job where I just go in, get my body scanned, record enough random words to use my voice for an AI, and then just endlessly collect payments from usage fees.
Most "celebrities" are just too greedy, which is why I end up having a hard time supporting them. If you don't live in a big city, you really don't need more than $100k/year to live a comfortable life, and being able to just straight up retire/work 1 day/year, simply by selling my AI self off, would be incredible.
I legitimately don't even know what these people use their multi-million dollar a year incomes for. I've thought long and hard about it and genuinely can't ever see myself legitimately spending more than $500k/year, outside of maybe taxes on a private island. Like, really, how do you spend more than $500k/year unless you're quite literally taking a trip and going somewhere every single day of the year? You're literally already talking about having a daily budget of over a thousand dollars.
@@Robian_ identity theft is not "new technology". you can't legally use the likeness of an individual without their consent.
@@AtomicArtumasyeah, that’d be good for you, but most creatives have a passion for what they do. Even if it’s still a job, people still do have their passion for it. People just wouldn’t be happy with it. I as an artist wouldn’t feel proud or accomplished generating an image and selling it
@@DestroyerApollyon Who said they would use existing actors? In AI generated movies, they eventually just won't need actors at all. Even if they did use existing actors, they aren't dumb, they'd obviously have the actor/actress sign a contract giving consent.
"This is very human" is gonna be a phrase people are gonna start using more often very soon
The design is very human, easy to use.
emotionAI coming soon near you.. 99% cant tell the difference!
No, A.I will be more human than humans. For A.I it will just be a question of mimicking and it will mimic better than you can imagine.
“your scientist were so preoccupied with whether or not they could didn’t you stop to think if they should?” -Ian Malcolm
in this case they were thinking about money
I mean they think about it all the time though the people making AI constantly questioning it and taking precautions. Meanwhile the anti AI art crowd wants to ruin art forever by telling governments to crack down on all art overall which would kill the art industry.
Exactly what came to my mind
You’re right. Fuck OpenAI.
They know exactly what they are doing. They want to starve our souls.
One thing for sure, the days of canceling youtubers over texts they sent or things they said in videos is gonna either get worse and attack innocent youtubers, or create so much doubt that the guilty ones will get off scott free.
Tbh, it's usually not even about what you do, it's about how you move forward. I don't care enough about drama to memorize these types, but I definitely remember hearing about examples that took a hit after drama, but then carried on like normal and their success came back because most people don't care. Meanwhile, people who are completely innocent also get destroyed because the drama changes them as a person, and their new persona just doesn't jive the same with their audience or content creation.
@@SoverineSR True, but even still it's something to think about. There's no question that this drama is mentally harmful to people, and now that it is easier and easier to fake, it will just make good content harder to come by.
Coleen Ballinger and Sssniperwolf already bounced back with no damage and there are still people watching even EDP. It won't change nothin
you don't need AI to fake texts.
@@Someone-sc2hk sure. But it can make it easier to do mass things.
It doesn’t even matter if the videos end up true or false in terms of a court case or online drama. Many people will just need to see it once, and haters of all types will jump on it to prove themselves right about something. Your image will be destroyed before the false image will, and no matter if it’s found as fake or not, you will permanently lose a lot of your image from it.
yea
trying to frame someone of a crime would become so easy, any sort of evidence becomes questionable
I know this first hand years ago someone framed me as a horrible person and ofc they can get away with it scott free, people nowadays go on rumors and or face value things instead of thinking for themselves and confronting someone on something "Did you really do this? What's your side of your story?". What we get now is well, like I said peopel taking face values "So you did this? I hate you" even though their proof is one line of text that couldve easily been photoshopped.. Or Even AI made and pasted into a place. Or just a foul human being made it.@@stormbreaker3175
We already have that in a world where the public believes simple statements. That's already in our psyche as "a statement can be a lie" well stronger than an AI video, yet we still fall for it. Future disaster.
Look at how the entire news cycle can be wrong on a topic, and no one ever sees the retractions and keeps believing it’s true. No one EVER accepts that the person/news they like was wrong and that the correction is true
Let's not pretend like framing people online was previously hard. People consider Discord screenshots inviolable evidence, and all those require is 5 minutes in inspect element.
the scariest part imo, is that most footage in security/body cams is not gonna be this high quality, which will make it easier to make stuff that is convincing with few noticable errors that could be used to cause trouble
No, fake body cam footage isn't why this is scary. It's scary because the police force can now claim that real incriminating body cam footage was actually AI generated in an attempt to cover its tracks. Because qualified immunity doesn't already make it hard enough to force police officers to face consequences for their abuses of power even if there is inarguable proof.
Ai can replicate body cam footage
Soon, we will see the next version of Will Smith eating pasta when the AI is handed out for general use.
He made it himself.
*I, Robot flashbacks start*
that is real already and has him kinda complaining about it
This new version will slap the pasta and tell it not to say garbage about his wife.
@@myatnykrolik7593 yep in his official Instagram page little while ago lmaoo
seeing my child hood minecart yt telling me were all doomed makes me realized that I need to lock in
Lol wtf I just realized bros talking about ai controversies.
The scariest thing about the speed at which AI developed is that it DID happen progressively over time. It just so happened that it exponentially progressed faster and faster.
It squirmed its way into everyday life like a worm while morbidly growing overnight and before we knew it, fiction had become reality.
First: Talk With AI
Second: Generating images (like the "art")
Third: Ai Video
Fourth: Ai Voices (which is the worst one)
Fifth: music, dang
Are you not aware that A.I isn't even 10% of what it will be in 10 years? We are at the beginning of the curve. Actually, the curve hasn't even started. It starts when AGI is turned on, then you will see about "morbidly growing overnight"
Put your seatbelt on timmy
@@kitsuneWC
5 is ai music
The amount of NSFW content that will create will be mind boggling. There will be so many lawsuits
There will be one lawsuit that sets the precedent and a new law that tries but will ultimately fail to remedy this.
@@RGC_animationyeah like game piracy, its techically illegal yet people pirate games all the time with no problem
Theres already some going around.. Its a problem right now thats getting worse..
There's already a lot. I went onto deviantart before their policy or whatever went up and was slammed in the face with penis. I wasn't that angered, but surprised. And it was clearly AI.
The thing is, the law only matters when laws are enforceable. If video AI models can generate offline on high-end home computers like deep fake or stable diffusion, then people will be able to generate videos leaving nearly no trace whatsoever. Trying to ban AI is like trying to ban a drug that can be summoned with a magic chant. It's unstoppable. And even if it was hypothetically stoppable, do you think the 80 year olds running our countries will have any clue as to how?
“finally, we have created the Torment Nexus, from world-famous novel Don’t Create the Torment Nexus”
Yeah, this shit is horrifying
"Don't" what's that mean? /j
Finally: Torment nexus
since when has any author written about ai video generation?
@@tux1468allegory, my dear
7:50 Was literally an episode of Law and Order, the prosecution ended up using an AI generated murder scene to convict a guy they knew was guilty but didn't have enough evidence to convict. (AI footage was given to them by the former coowner of a massive AI company, he gave the state that 'evidence' to become sole owner)
SAY WHAT?!?! I'm surprised I missed that one :c
Idc if he was guilty or not, that's slimy as hell.
Well, nothing is out like Sora just yet.
The episode is "Law and Order 23x02 'Human Innovation'"
Enjoy :)
Does anyone want to start a new Amish sect where we have technology but capped at 2010 level? 😅
the problem is that 2010 tech would still be able to access the internet, thus leaving the problem where it stands. We'd have to create our own internet, and somehow block the rest of the world from it.
We will become the Neo-Luddites
that sounds terrible
Haha funny seeing you here. Push it to 2012 and I'm happy to join.
@@freezingicy9457 Terribly funny
6:20 You pretty much took the words out of my own mouth as to my main problem with Sora. I have no doubts that OpenAI is fully aware of how this technology could be abused, and will do everything they can to prevent that. But that won't stop other tech companies from replicating the code and creating their own version that removes these restrictions. The same thing happened when they made the Dall-E image generator. It started with just that, with safeguards in place to prevent the creation of NSFW material and copyrighted characters, among other things. But then other programs like Stable Diffusion, MidJourney, and NovelAI Diffusion come along and remove most/all of those restrictions. I have no doubt in my mind that at least one of them are already in the process of making their own version, and when that happens, there's nothing OpenAI can really do to stop it.
This is also the same thought I had having after seeing Sora get announced. After using Dalle 3 with tons of ristrictions then moving to Stable diffusion with basically no restrictions, I am very scared how how you can just about generate anything no matter if its copyright or NSFW and im very afraid that the same thing will happen to Sora.
Gonna be honest, I've got no clue why people worry so much about creating NSFW stuff. R34 and erotic fanfictions and whatnot have been a thing for literally pretty much forever, and honestly, a personalized custom "adult content" generator is probably the single best use of AI possible if you really think about it. Anyone that's not a completely prude and has at least one "interest" that's outside of the "vanilla" sphere has likely had at least one session in their life of searching for literally hours for the right scene or image or video. So... being able to just generate that by simply typing in what you want? Yeah, that would be incredible. And considering how... "bad" a lot of parts of the adult content industry really are, it's not like it's really a "loss" if they suffer from it.
@@AtomicArtumas I don't particularly care about creating NSFW content either (I'd be a hypocrite if I was considering what I do). It was just one of the main examples of what OpenAI typically tries to restrict when releasing their models.
That said, the idea of a non-restrictive equivalent of Sora being able to create NSFW material - while admittedly would be quite impressive from a technical perspective - would also be quite scary considering the already horrendous trend of celebrity deepfakes.
The 2 comments above mine are somehow both true enough to leave me at like 50/50 conflicted
@@AtomicArtumas Making that content isn't inherently an issue. The issue is when it's made in the likeness of a real person who didn't consent to it, and then that content is distributed publicly.
Something that brings me comfort when it comes to ai advancement is that there will always be people against it, we can never be completely overwhelmed by big companies if we still have each other and people that don't want it.
I think such an ethic will be nearly impossible to sustain in the long run.
@@numbynumb could you elaborate i want to hear you opinion
@@idkwhatimdoingproductions8824 Even if 50% of the world took a stand against ai, at some point you will age and your kids will say "nah ai is cool, my old man was a boomer"
@@idkwhatimdoingproductions8824 AI is being integrated into the digital tools that people use for every kind of content creation; art, music, writing, video, etc. Beyond a certain point in the not-so-distant future, being "against it" will have you opposing almost everything that people are doing in those spaces. We're seeing the beginning of a new era in how computation and ux is approached, generally speaking.
@@numbynumb i absolutely think you're right but its my impression that some people out there think that the entire future of the world will all be made by ai, all the movies we watch, music we listen to and games we play. And i personally think that such a future wont be the case. What you are saying is absolutely correct in that it will probably be integrated in most of our tools, but it wont be everything
In the end, you should have put up a text like: "Prompt: CaptainSparklez talks about AI controversies for 21 minutes"
In the end, you won't need to
In a year from now it'll be flipped. AI talks about captainsparkelz "controversies" for 21 minutes.
~ PS - This isn't written by AI. 👀
Yeah, gotta label your training data accurately
But in the end, it doesn't even matter.
lmao yep@@SubZeroGamez
Every day, the dead internet theory is slowly becoming truer than ever before
Holy shit you're right these comments are straight up AI generated
its already true, im a bot, beep boop
@@abe-dangerthey got past recaptcha 😧 we’re screwed
no??
@@WaddleBlock aaah!!! beep boop!
This feels like the prelude of the atom bomb. We knew the outcome of the atom bomb, it allowed humanity to destroy itself completely. What will be the outcome of A.I? It's a little too optimistic to think that it will benefit humanity, because humanity could've used nuclear energy for good, but to this day it is used to hold our existence hostage. If Matrix has taught me anything, it's that there is a fate worse than death, and that is never having known the truth.
i’d just like to say that i completely agree with you. “hold our existence hostage” is such a good way to put it
I'd argue AI is actually more harmful than Atomic Bombs
Well, to humanities credit, we didnt blow ourselves up with nukes yet so maybe there is hope for the future.
except we have used nuclear energy for good as well, that's what you didn't mention, and I feel like it's gonna be the same with AI, some people are gonna be using it for good, some people will be using it for bad.
@@Someone-sc2hkWhat good though?
Syndromes quote from the Incredibles is so accurate “If everyone’s super… no one is…”
This is why some try to spread their sickness to others. If we're all sick, then none of us suffer from it!
VERY underrated comment.
@@SoverineSRYep the 🏳️⚧️🏳️⚧️🏳️⚧️
that's why people with resources will become "super super" or "ultra super". Everyone else will be regular super. That is how it will work.
@@itslitgamestv6827 We don't have the technology to become "super super" yet...
Someone on tiktok made a funny point as to the Sora software-- the SECOND it is released to the general public, someone is going to use it to create defamatory video content of a politician saying/doing something bad, and it will be swiftly regulated to oblivion right after that. Gives me a little bit of hope in these otherwise dark times.
The thing is, even if there is regulations on it for the general public, I’m sure politicians and news channels will still have access. It’s going to be scary not knowing whether reporters are duping people on issues.
@@evilee0242yeah they could dupe false flag attacks or terror attacks, Falsify foreign leader speech to start conflict etc.
By the time we get to regulation it will be long too late. It's already widely misused, and it's growing exponentially. It doesn't matter which political group is in power in any place in the world, AI generated content that can be freely misused is a VERY POWERFUL tool, and to get a power hungry group to give that up is like trying to get a small toddler to not put in their mouth that rock they just picked up.
Yeah, tbh if they are dumb enough to not regulate the hell out of it before hand, id generate a crazy video of the top confess people too, just something embarrassing and totally against thier and americas values. They would see its a national security threat before a real enemy could use it.
The same could be said the other way round though right? Politician does something bad, passed up as AI content.
There's a lot of corruption and bad things people get away with already, now imagine just being able to falsely flag it all as AI.
Writing and making art are the only things that truly bring joy to me. And I know many people feel the same. The world seems to be very eager to take that away from us.
A funny comment someone else said:
"Computers in future will replace all the menial labor so people get to do the creative jobs instead."
Computer: replaces creative jobs.
To be fair, robots will never take away YOUR ability to make art, so at least there’s that
@@justasmltwngir1732 Yeah but when you aspire to be a writer you kinda need people to read your things. If publishers will get all too eager to accept AI shit, I might need to look for more independant ways to publish I guess?
same
@@sono_chi_no_sodium_chlorid7635 for me as a writer, it doesn't matter how little people see my works because it is more of a spiritual thing for me. However I think it also means you can take advantage of it for yourself and simply enhance your own production abilities.
04:18 This here is my sentiment towards AI: The technology is incredibly mind blowing, but it has absolutely terrifying implications for all of us.
yep
ai in general will ruin everything, its affecting artists already. It will start affecting everyone else's livelihood too
@@FemboyKaiSaku I'm a 3D artist and I am genuinely deeply terrified of the ramifications of AI.
I've quite literally put my whole life into this, I started at 8 years old, it's my only real marketable skill, and I genuinely wouldn't know what to do with my life if I couldn't make that my career anymore.
@@The-Urban-Goose my friend, luckily i personally don't believe that we will get rid of the need for REAL artists in the world. because AI cannot make physical structures as well as a well crafted artist/sculptor
Yeah but it's usually incredibly easy to tell if something has been altered by AI or deepfake. Nobody is going to get fooled by fan made videos of the presidents playing fortnite.
As someone currently studying to work in film & TV, who is incredibly passionate about storytelling, screenwriting, cinematography, and everything that goes into the making of a film, this is terrifying. I'm a digital artist too, so I've already felt the impact of AI on one of my crafts - commission frequency has gone completely down the drain over the past year. I thought my other dream was safe. It feels so incredibly hopeless. When I enter the film industry, how much of my passion and manual work will be denied? How soulless will my stories become once they get churned through the AI meatgrinder? Will I ever even get to hold the camera? Direct a team of actual people on set? It feels like I'm fighting an uphill battle against a piece of technology that wants to crush my dreams, just so that the billionaires can make more billions.
I feel for you, honestly. I’m nearing my “exit” from that work as a small producer wearing many hats. This does look like it’s going to be crushing some dreams. But… you might want to get into doing docs or other reality based content such as events etc. I wish you the best!
Just to clarify, you're not fighting against an "evil machine", you're fighting against greedy people using a very capable tool. The fault is not of the tool.
You can use this tech to make any story you want a reality without any gatekeepers. I am optimistic this will actually enable creativity and not stifle it.
Will we face a time like in Dune? A war against thinking machines.
There’s always Starbucks 😂
If there is something that can make a teenager feel old, it's the progress of ai. This is just horrifying.
Edit: how the heck did i get 100 likes?!
I was just about to make a similar comment.
It feels like trying to get into the meta of a new game. While you are trying to learning the basics, someone comes and sweeps you. It feels like you had to play since launch to be that good. And all this launched years ago before I even took any interest into programming.
True af
I'm 55, how you think I feel after a lifetime in IT. I feel like petroleum.
@@GungaLaGunga belive me, i already assumed so.
@@ZeJackCat22 well, at least you are aware of the situation and can adapt more easily than us old farts. Your brain still has lots of neuroplasticity. Your generation has some latent heroes in it, that will bring society some very cool new ways to do things. Hopefully you reform how we live, in a simpler more sustainable way. Think of this way, we were always wizzing very quicly thru space on this big blue marble called Earth. We were never safe lol. heck your generation will probably might space travel. That would be cool. If we survive lol. Cheers.
I was never afraid of AI gaining consciousness and taking over the world, instead I'm always afraid of what people could and would do with AI
The issue was never the AI itself
By itself it can do nothing
The issue is the people. And the people we have in power cannot and should not be trusted
Eventually, AI should theoretically be able to think for itself. so that will eventually be a problem. but for now yes.
for now.
@@anthonydalporto9742 from how I see it, if AI ever gain consciousness, its not likely that they will turn againts human, even if they do I don't think it would be a bigger problem than people using AI for evil
As someone interested in tech, the technology behind it is fascinating. But as someone who also understands how these are trained and will eventually be used, im terrified for what this means for all creators once it’s available for public consumption.
As someone with a basic level knowledge but enough to understand what AI is capable of: Literally how is this terrifying? AI behaves in a very predictable way, I have not seen a single image that isnt generic or in any way shape or form not recognizable as AI. I have also not seen a single image that doesnt have for some "odd reason" a center focus. Predictability is at the Core of AI. Cause if it wasnt, it couldnt work. It needs to work in predictable patterns or else we lose control over it. Once it doesnt anymore, we get to the point where it becomes sentient. And well guess what, we have probably Skynet on our hands at that stage.
Stop it with yalls fearmongering please.
@@GikamesShadow Great comment, just curious as to the likelihood of AI generating “unfocused” content. Would we have to really design algorithms and such that could lead to a sentient AI, or this far out of the realm of possibility?
there should be a big watermark/text that says "THIS VIDEO IS GENERATED BY AI AND NOT A REAL FOOTAGE" even if you pay for premium
That would actually result worse in the long run. Because there's always some people who can not only use source code, API or any other given entity, but they can also remake the whole thing from scratch. Let's assume Sora is the market leader, and even if you pay for premium it still has a watermark. Another app which is not open to public use will simply not add that watermark and STILL generate media like this. And in the court, you will not be able to defend yourself saying that video was created by AI. Because market leader apps which are open to public would add a watermark, right?
@@tilkilit then go for the most brutal plan, just don't make Sora public. It's not that hard
FRR THAT'S WHAT I'VE BEEN SAYING
@@ed_cmntonlyThat isn’t happening. It is being released by someone, somewhere. The only realistic question is how to adapt.
but then someone could make an AI that removes the watermark on AI videos. he'll probably use AI to make that AI...
I have realized that I don’t like watching these videos because they cause me to worry so much about everything, but I also need them to stay updated on the world in a simple and educational way. So thank you Jordan.
I truly believe that generative AI should be forced to have a watermark on it, so that everyone who sees it knows it is fake.
there will be open source Ai that can be downloaded and code edited to not place watermark.
Okay, let's say every industrialized nation makes this a law (I highly doubt countries like China or Russia would go along with this but let's just say for fun they do) now all some African nation has to do is set up enough power generation somehow to get enough electricity for companies to come and develop this kind of AI in that nation. And because this nation does not have this kind of a law requiring the watermark. Now you have all kinds of AI generated footage without the watermark and it would be impossible to trace it all because of the shear amount they could generate. If we, as a society had started preparing for this 15 years ago, I would have a lot more hope that this kind of problem could be solved in such a way that it is mostly beneficial for everyone, however, in the society we exist in today where companies basically run governments. It is too late to do anything about this unless we can fix the fact that companies run governments first
Watermarks can be digitally removed. What is needed are cryptographic keys. Anything else can be tampered with
@@jeremyzabel2923 I'm not 100% sure what you mean by cryptographic keys? But you can fake any kind of communication or authentication with enough effort
@@jeremyzabel2923 Cryptographic information will be removed or invalidated by any form of cutting, editing or screen recording. That accounts for the vast majority of ways videos are shared online.
What we need is media literacy, intuition and curiosity. Just like how the humans of today can tune out advertising on demand, we need to learn an inherent instinct to check the source, detect BS, and look into where information is coming from and how it might be motivated. So, no different from regular misinformation, really. That's not going to happen without ol' Grandma Jolene falling for a scam or ol' Uncle Billy Bob falling for a political conspiracy theory, since these skills don't generate overnight, but I personally am not worried about the long-term future of society based on AI.
"But rarely are you gonna be analyzing footage-"
Well funny you should mention that, as you were saying this, her legs swapped sides.
2:27
oh my god that's weird, i didn't see that the first time
And also, I analyze every little thing in my path. I've been doing this ever since I was born really, but then again every living thing does, just not the way I do it. Unfortunately, there are these weird random most terrible times where I don't analyze stuff which is very annoying and knowing that I am being controlled by a higher being at those worst times makes me angry... They won't even let me kill myself despite the fact no human can help me with my depression ;-; Everything is just gonna keep going downhill until I find out what they want from me to make it stop.
Damn that's trippy
TRIPPY
Wait until her legs don't swap sides, you are going to be shit out of luck then arent you? I think you forget that this is as bad as the technology gets. It will only get better. and better
There will be that one random girl/guy that hates you, downloads your photos, feeds them to the AI in order to make some embarrassing videos just to ruin you
Or the reverse might happen where someone tries to incriminate you with real footage and people think it's AI
@@FunAngelo2005 What if I wanted everyone to know that I'm insane? I mean let's ignore all the sick/perverted stuff and move to badass stunts for example, you do something and everyone believes it's fake..
whats worse is that it doesnt even need to be advanced enough to be indistinguishable from reality for it to be embarrassing. if theres perverted/other footage of you, a lot of people will harass you regardless of whether its real or not
This has already happened though. Its just stills but several accounts of this have happened including in a HS..
This is going to be the primary bullying tactic for middle/high school in like, 3 years.
Kids are always looking for new ways to socially assassinate one another.
So basically... the entire world will reenact the salem witch trials. Oh boy.
Hello league boy
pretty much
We've basically reenacted like 5-ish time in the U.S. alone...
Hello everybody plays Vars
Absolutely LOVE these conversations you have with us. The genie is indeed out of the bottle. My really big, big worry is about those of us who are aging, and kinda losing our marbles. It's going to be really, really difficult for many of us not to be 'fooled' (I'm in my sixth decade). My students, however, in Middle School seem far more adept at, or rather 'sus' about what they see and read. That in itself is a huge issue! But also a bit of a relief. It's going to be much harder to fool them.
But again, thank you for these videos, love your perspective, and your insight.
Momibelle
The more news and developments I hear about the more I think we are speed running towards a
dystopian future.
I really don’t see any way the benefits outweigh the damage this tech could cause, I mean we are barely able to use the tech we have now responsibly.
Video evidence will not be able to be used in trials , the end of art as an expression of humanity, our grip on reality itself could be little to none.
I really hope I’m wrong but I can’t shake this feeling of dread .😔
I just hope that the right regulations are put in place to keep us from completely disaster.
P.S.
I think a quote that applies perfectly to this situation is one from Jeff Goldblum in the first Jurassic Park Film
“ Your Scientist were so preoccupied with wether or not they could, They didn’t stop to think if they should.”
Exactly
In the darkest time line it could bring the end of society. Imagine kids being raised on this, then their kids too. We had 2 year olds using ipads years ago, more so today. Give this tech a few generations and they will grow up consumed by it, not saying everyone and that theyd be lazy, but its human nature to seek out the quick reward and comfy life. Whats better then everything generated at your finfer tips. With that, they wont care about laws and government and jobs, and everything will start to fall apart at the seams. Like the bronze age collapse. For around 500 years hardly anyone knew how to write, just because it was forgotten. They will forget how to operate a society at its base.
I still don't understand why people seem to believe human creativity gets erased by simply having another tool to make art. You can *still do art* . Just the same as people still do pottery even though a machine in a factory can churn out plates, pots and bowls thousands of times more efficiently than you can. Need money to survive? That's a problem we need to address at a societal level with policies like UBI as automation takes over. Labour being automated so we can all do whatever we want instead of having to work is the definition of a *utopia* , not a dystopia.
@@ThingsAreGettingTooSpicydid you not watch wall-e?
@@ThingsAreGettingTooSpicyits also limiting careers in art and design, as someone who was looking into a career in graphic deign i now have to rethink my entire future because i doubt i could have a successful career in the field anymore.
on the plus side, if the internet dies we’ll have to touch grass on a mass scale
I am somewhat looking forward to this. The only way for human creativity to survive is for us to largely abandon the use of digital media, unless someone comes up with a better idea. Just my opinion
@@Wilkins325 The AIssholes could still make a robot arm with a pencil on it… but yeah I do think it would be nice that people could start waking up to the need to have real-life community spaces, and start creating them again.
@@Wilkins325no one is leaving the internet, kids will grow up with ai, and they will embrace it. Especially since parents can’t raise a kid without we giving them a tablet to quite them down
@@jondoe8350 You seem to be uninformed. There is a much higher than normal chance that the Sun's current active cycle could send a coronal mass ejection or solar flare that would cause a geomagnetic storm that would quite literally fry pretty much everything electrical in the world, effectively leading to a societal collapse and likely a mass die-off of people due to starvation. We've already had some VERY close calls in the last few years, and we're not even past the worst of it yet.
@@Wilkins325physical media is also not safe from AI
ChatGPT: I can see how it is useful, and in fact, I use it myself for a lot of things, such as ideas on how to structure essays, topics I could write about, improve and explain code, discuss alternative ideas and solutions, and the list goes on.
MidJourney: AI images have a weak wow factor once you figure out it's AI, I still use it for inspiration when I'm really struggling to make something good, mainly recommend V3 for general inspiration for colour or shapes, and V5 and V6 for detail ideas, they are also not too bad for game textures, especially if you nail the lighting and volumetrics.
Sora: Its cool, but damn I'm struggling to find a positive use case here, all I can come up with is messing around with it, or placeholders for video, but even then it's not much.
It's good that they aren't releasing it yet, Sora is by far the most likely AI to have a serious negative impact.
the most I've used ChatGPT for is generating realistic error/spam text. and even then, I had to ask it multiple times before it was staggered and differentiated enough to not look copy/pasted.
"Excuse me sir we have footage of you shoplifting here. Please place your hands behind your back"
Me: 😶
i wish one of Sora's demo videos was Will Smith eating pasta so we can REALLY understand how much the tech has improved
There is, Just google "sora will smith eating spagetti".
It looks like he is having parkinson, but it is realistic.
Exceept for the hair part.
@@hubertnnn that video was actually him parodying the original ai video
@@Marshimizedyeah that's the thing that we should be concerned about... people now believe that was AI generated even though it's real.
@@ricosrealm too true
When I was in highschool I wanted to be a freelance photographer. I decided to go a different route and I'm glad I did. I bet some photographers are shitting their pants right about now.
Not really, because what worth is a photo if it's generated? Isn't the whole point of photography to capture actual locations and then sell the result? If it's something like a monument then yeah, maybe ai can do that, still wouldn't get accepted anywhere, but if it's a forest or a lake in the middle of nowhere the story changes. Also, you didn't become a photographer why? Because you'll never make it since because to be a photographer you need exceptional talent, good eye and so on and so fort? Yeah, ai is not the problem if people can't become professional artists.
@@yasininn76 My point is AI can devalue photos. If a real photo and an AI photo look identical they are both worthless. Photographers, videographers and animators will probably start losing their jobs at some companies.
Also I didn’t become a photographer because I decided to focus my creative work on jewelry. I’d rather tinker with tangible things rather than some pixels on a computer.
And what's your job now? Software? Law? Medicine? Engineering? Construction?
Literally all of humanity is not just obsolete, but becoming extinct within this century, given probability of WW3 to secure raw resources for AI labor, it might be this decade.
@@Ilamarea Nobody here asked for your cynicism, so shove it and let the people who care about their happiness fight for a better future. While you coward stand by and do nothing.
@@yasininn76corporations do not care if something is AI generated. Nestle literally killed babies to make a profit.
Edit : and people still buy Nestle, because they're human.
When I thought of AI in the future, I imagined humanoid looking robots with advanced AI.
But this, is MUCH scarier than the above.
Not to sounds pessimistic, but I'm sure that's not too far off either.
Wait till they learn how to make bodies for themselves
Yeah. What I find scariest is that this isn't its own distinctive entity. It has no logic to outsmart, no moves to predict. It is a tool at humanity's disposal and one that is improving faster than any thought of stopping it can develop.
This is a unique kind of eldritch horror in that not only are humans its creator, they are also its mind. For all intents and purproses, humanity is about to become an eldritch horror to itself.
@@remor698damn. That was a powerful statement /gen
You imagined correctly. Unfortunately, this is actually what progress towards that looks like. It’s going to get freaky and weird. It really is like frankenstein creating his monster
“OpenAI was so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn’t stop to think if they should.”
if they chose not to, someone else would anyways. and that might be a worse outcome. the invention of AI has always been inevitable, all we can do is embrace it and make it useful to us.
Why wouldn't they? AI is over exagerated. It's not going to be the end of us. People thought that about cars and radio and deepfakes.
they def should have look at microsoft's stock nyroooooooooooooooom
As I said many times before, our civilization is not ready yet for automation. If people aren't careful with automation we may end up in a dystopian society where AI generated images and videos are the least of your concern. As we are moving forward in automation a lot of work sector may become redundant in the future, so we will end up with huge corporations that are owned by small group of people that needs 100 or less humans to function almost autonomously. Most people have no idea how dangerous the future is if we aren't careful with automation because at that time you'll have no way to resist. At least now if people don't like something they can protest against it but once you have enough machines if people started to fight against corporation or a group that has a significant power good luck fighting against robots.
This instantly got me thinking about splitting the atom, simply ground breaking research and discovery.. but even then what would that mean for humanity? we now know.
I can't even finish watching this, it's making me feel too hopeless
Stuff like this makes me genuinely suicidal. AI means a lot more than what people lead on or argue about, there are many facets people aren't even discussing that are issues, such as the issues involving job market homogeneity, the ramifications of a more paranoid and isolated society, and the spike of instant gratification.
@@nichtdeutsch people are way too okay with the snake eating its own tail scenario
Welcome to the liberal world order@@nichtdeutsch
But you still feel.. and that is what separates us and makes us unique.. that’s gotta count for something
I plan on making money becoming a pro fighter. Let's see AI do that! Lmao!
As someone who has been doing art for 23 years, professionally 12. This stuff frustrates me to no end, I’ve spent my life molding my skills into what I can accomplish today. My usual time taken with each art piece is generally a few days all the way to an entire month, the fact that these people using this software could essentially render me obsolete being they can generate a nearly perfect art piece within the time it takes to type a prompt is infuriating to put it lightly. The last thing I want is people to start commenting on my digital works things like “wow that’s some pretty ai art”, or even having the thought cross their minds that it might be ai art. It took me 23 of my 26 years to get to where I am today and I’m still improving. Don’t take that away from me.
Well, sorry to break it but too bad, thats capitalism for you, youll probably have to adapt or try to get acceptance with human-made art which honestly gets more and more unrealistic if sora is as good as they advertise it + ai keeps getting better and better. Sparklez sits around drowning in millions because he played minecraft online, some people have big ambitions, talent and work hard but theyll never make it cause the market is oversaturated with even more talented people, most people have depression work shit jobs etc, and at the same time there are engineers at openai that earn monthly 300,000$, and just so their family can live in luxury, theyre willing to burn the world. As humans were destined to make selfish, wrong choices if it means a second of profit for us. If it makes you happy, alot more people than digital artists will get their jobs minimalised on the market thanks to this
It seems people really do not give artist enough credit. Even though the generated image might look pretty to some , it lacks all the passion , energy , and meaning that would it make something art. In my view art isn’t just a monotonous job or activity, its an expression of one’s thoughts and emotions, a way of life even.
The chance that people would give the same value to a piece created by a person to one generated by a computer is tragic. I really hope that the result of this massive push for AI generated images is a greater appreciation for the passion and life that artist put into their creations.
don't worry ai isn't replacing artists this is just all bogus. its like with chat gpt theres legal issues because ai and chat gpt uses other people works to get results and a lot of companies are having legal issues from using chat gpt to help with coding projects. ai doesn't make its own shit yet.
I think AI is just making this more apparent, if you love doing something, just continue to do it. in whatever way you can continue to advance your art, you will find a group that will appreciate "Human" art. eventually all will be replaced with the AI, so all of us will eventually have to deal with this. we are approaching the turning of an age, and all of us must change with it.
Wompyty womp womp
Prompt: CaptainSparklez talking about a video AI called Sora while being scared of the future
captainfakelez
The centralization of advanced AI technologies by a few Big Tech companies is deeply disturbing... Also, OpenAI which was originally a non profit company and all their original software was open source went for profit in 2019. Their last open source entry being ChatGPT-3 was in September 18th, 2020
this makes me want to go buy a cabin in the middle of nowhere
cabins can't move. I'm going to convert a box truck into an expandable unit that has two stories. I have a feeling mobility will be important soon. This world is getting too crazy to be stuck in one place if you catch my drift.
same, well, just life in general has...
@@LilRedRasta: true
This makes me want to travel to an alternate universe.
On some courage the cowardly dog type stuff
What im terrified about more, than content creators, are people, who try to break from internet or just dont use it
Since others can just prank or outright slander you out of spite, boredom or they are sociopaths/psychopaths, you are forced to use internet to be ready to counter that, whoever you are: a preschooler, elderly or a hillbilly
Internet with that device will become the nessesity not on surface terms, but also as a safety device... The already toxic atmosphere is going to get even more toxic
Yea, that's by far the most terrifying aspect. In terms of art, no human can be fully replaced, AI can't do abstract thinking, but the future of slander is looking real bleak. Especially these days where people seem to love faking evidence of horrible crimes just because they don't like someone or twist what they're saying. The world is getting increasingly hostile and our capacity to hurt each other much deeper than any knife or gun could is only getting greater.
I will make *3* easy predictions here:
*1. More than 90 percent of consumers will not care if something is AI generated or not as long as they find it entertaining.*
*2. Companies will not care about replacing human employees, and they will use AI to save a huge amount of money and also be able to release products much faster, which ultimately means earning more money in less time.*
*3. There will soon be a point where AI generated content will be indistinguishable from that "human element" that we always talk about.*
yes yes and yes.
humans being replaced is fine as long as the gov taxes and redistributes wealth. "No chance" you might think, but unless this very thing happens, the world economy collapses. It wont be optional. There will be no point for companies to create products using A.I if no one on earth has the income to buy the products.
number 3 is called the death of the internet. At this point the internet will be useless for gathering information since something true and something false will look the same. Videos, blog posts, news articles. I'm not sure how we are going to navigate the last one, but it'll be interesting to see
Those are way too easy to predict! Honestly, if one cannot see this then they need a more open mind and also the ability to extrapolate things just a bit in the future.
@@Raulikien Exactly.
Those are some basic predictions and everybody should be able to sense where this is going.
But there's a lot of people who still don't get it.
My immediate reaction to Sora was to be depressed and horrified.
I have not changed my stance.
Same
Yeah, humans are scared of progress. In other news, wet water.
@@pyerack true
I'm genuinely terrified of sora possibly becoming public use
This is technology that feels like it shouldn't be available for the next some decades like sparklez mentioned
I'm scared if art or videos will ever be touched by a human again, I know that's over the top to think but we just witnissed sora while literally only a year ago we had will smith eating pasta
the future is scary
I hope sora never becomes a public commodity
It's unfortunate. And we can't really stop it. Even I am against something as careless as this.
This is abusing a tool for the worse of us all. Hardly anyone benefits from ai videos. The only ones that can are researchers when they want/are required to show what it would look like if it were alive.
for people who genuinely enjoy arts and video, they will very much do so. without the weight of financial gain on their mind, they will make the art they like. and the value the creator receives not in dollar but genuine appreciation will be that much more valued.
there is a saying, "you may think you're thinking your own thoughts, but you're not. you're thinking your cultures thoughts".
realistically if AI becomes advanced enough, food and shelter will be infinite. as well as the ability to venture. if AI does all the work, from sourcing and constructing, how much would it need to be paid to build a car? (Answer: it wouldn't need the money) prefer a plane instead of a car? what about a space ship? we are alleviating the dependency on one another freeing ourselves to do what we all enjoy. if you enjoy being physical, why not a fighting robot to spar with. or a fabrication bot to produce structural components to build your won vehicle by hand.
dont get me wrong, there is a threat AI posses. but its less to do with jobs and more to do with individuals who are psychopaths and want to control others with force or charisma.
Never become public so governments, corporations and companies, terrorists abuse AI to further their own agendas?
No one can stop it
you absolutely KNOW they'll make it a public commodity and they'll slap a hefty price tag on
it and run wild. but hopefully in the coming decades it will ease up and we'll have better laws to
combat against it like with what they did to ai art recently.
I hope they make ai generated watermarks mandatory, cause this stuff can cause a lot of harm and
if they're paying attention, likely big politicians are taking notice too.
Anyone remember the Matrix Awakens demo 2/3 years ago? Keanu told us this was coming
We're living in a 1984 prequel
I think that, no matter what side you're on for the AI debate, two things are true:
1. Objectively, this is impressive technology.
2. We need to slow down on public releases of these tech capabilities. Not slow down on the advancements themselves but give ourselves more time to grasp the tech as well as how we can both use and protect ourselves from it. Watermarks simply don't cut it for the general public.
Releasing it is how they get their funding to keep advancing it
watermarks need to be on the entire video (maybe not even visible to the human eye but in a way that software can identify it as ai generated) not just a piddly thing in the corner
Technology is progressing faster than what humans are physically able to process
This was one of the causes behind WW1 - I'll just leave this to your interpretation
You can easily wipe out visible watermarks with other ai tools or even manually because they don't even move.
CaptainSparklez said Sora was probably in the work for years, but truth is the technique it's build upon is only a few months old itself..
We humans inherently don't understand or are able to comprehend exponentialism.
I don't know how many times an artist I follow on twitter has posted about someone uploading their art style into AI prompts, it pisses me off cause they worked years and years on their art style just for someone to be able to take their images, train an AI, then steal their art style at the push of a button.
7:51 - This was already depicted with Lincoln Burrows in 'Prison Break', except it was still on tape. - Yes, fictional, but now that stuff is easily doctored and even generated, everyone is generally screwed.
It needs to be said, people have investigated this and OpenAI has several partnerships with companies such as Shutterstock, which seem to be providing the brunt of the "generation" here.
We're still far off from "enter prompt > completely new thing generated".
This is why all the released videos look like stock footage, for the most part. OpenAI is still limited by using copyright free footage as it's training data it seems for now.
Thank god
Well that's good
Means open source will beat em to the punch lmao
17:01
Thing with AI and big data is that you need, well, big data. AI can't really create new stuff. Best it does currently is giving you an average of a hundred other similar things. At best combining a few elements that aren't usually together, but that's it.
Feels like we're living out the beginning of a black mirror episode
get used to it
At least Black Mirror, The Twilight Zone, etc, focused on futures that were imaginable. The problem with creating futuristic science fiction now is that we don't have the intelligence to remotely fathom what the future will be like.
I think we may reach the singularity within my lifetime. The thing is, it's not the AI that's uncontrollable---it is the amount of people who will continue to use AI even after being told not to that are uncontrollable, because as long as the system can be shut down and/or deleted, it is never truly uncontrollable.
if it actually becomes sentient and gets into the cloud there's literally no stopping it. you can't just unplug the cloud, unfortunately.
@@Darthtanosthe cloud is just a bunch of scattered servers, you know that, right? It would be hard, but you can absolutely shut down the cloud. It's not some magic, unreachable realm where data becomes untouchable. It's just a glorified hunk of silicon and precious metals.
@@thedarter That is so spread out and owned by so many people it's realistically nigh impossible to completely destroy. Someone would have a small server in their closet they have forgot about for years where a sentient AI could endure past that purge.
@@darkenlightmage ...The cloud isn't 'every computer connected to the internet', it's a classification of a specific kind of web service where companies sell their servers to people.
@@somdudewillson Anyone can make a cloud. I have my own private cloud that I've setup myself, infrastructure included, that I can use to whatever I want. The cloud isn't something that is restricted to the FAANG, they just have the greatest share of it.
16:12 this gave me f**king chills.
👆I understand why some people will strongly disagree but take a moment to think about it. The majority of content nowadays is so degenerate unimpressive and just awful that even an AI generated content platform in the future could be better than the fast paced content people see today (if regulated by the right hands)
I could only see it being bad if those AI content platforms in the future became mainstream under the wrong hands or influence
I will NEVER actively consume A.I content. I will live off the grid before i adopt A.I into my daily life.
I'll only consume if it becomes better than human made content
@@racool911 it'll never be better honestly. All it's doing is taking knowledge that already exists and applying it to a prompt. Human art will always be superior. Whether or not it takes more effort to produce. Effort yields results in my opinion
Let me live sith u
What a bs, yt is 40% ai content
@@WhiteLavender425Yeah, exactly. I can't look into an AI picture and say "This is a lot of dedication and is unbelievable that someone could have done this." I don't know if you know what I am sayin'.
artists have been fighting this for at least 3 years now. yall never listened to us
The actor and writer strikes last year have a clause about banning AI and never being able to replace actors.
Unfortunately that lasts 4 years and apparently doesn't apply to voice actors or something like that (not 100% on the details). Also unfortunately doesn't stop another company from doing it
Too bad UA-camrs probably won't do a strike. Either because mean give up their passion, their career, or won't be taken serious by UA-cam company.
The same people who are calling visual artists crybabies will flock to defend their favorite actors who want to keep doing the acting themselves 🙄
@@cosmicllama6910 Where did you pull that from? Elaborate, please... with *sources*
@@logictom7254 your *sources* are any video talking about AI replacing visual artists of any kind, the comments fill with people hating on visual artists and saying we don't deserve to have our art or jobs protected, but I'm calling them hypocrites because if it was their favorite actors or musicians we know they would be defending them, their work and their jobs.
We have like a million stories about ai being bad, and yet here we are trying to advance it to crazy standards
I can see this going one way with AI video. Crime
OpenAi will most likely add restrictions
I can see two ways. Crime, and memes.
Now I see it going three ways. Crime, memes, and copycats
There was already a huge attack on an investment firm which had a vp tell someone to transfer money into the scammers account. Their were several people in the fake meeting and only 1 actual worker.
@@FunAngelo2005 maybe openai but what about other ais and ais that you can download and edit?
My honest hope is that Ai will only be used as a creative assistant tool, and that the audience will view that for of content.
I don’t want only Ai generated videos or images, but I would love to see it as an assistant in the creative process.
People are already making AI Art and posting it saying they drew it. Now imagine the extreme version of this... there is no hope
or just come up with your own ideas without a trillion dollar company telling you what to do
Don't worry, very soon you won't be able to tell what is A.I and what isn't. So you won't concern yourself with that.
@@hardboiledaleks9012 pretty sure ur just saying that to advertise the companies u make money from
The fact this happened in February. April fools day is GOING TO BE A DISASTER
How I don't see anything
@chady51 b
Heh, I het what he's saying. So much prank stuff you won't know if it's real or not. It going to be an interesting day that's for sure.
Keep making these discussion videos! I honestly think this is a great direction for the main channel post Minecraft. You talking about stuff you’re passionate and knowledgeable about is very entertaining, and you have the voice for this video format too. It’s simple and clean, not caught up in creator drama like other commentary channels (Mogul Mail, MoistCritikal, for example though I do enjoy them both) and that could be the niche, a broader perspective on online happenings from a wealth of experience. Excited to see what comes next!
My Paranoia is literally getting worse with each second
Nows a good time to get used to it man
Mass psychosis entered the chat
One day we will be looking for that crazy will smith eating pasta even when we have perfect sora footage. Gonna be a new video style, first.
5th
2 bots got here before you
this is a scary door that should've stayed closed
The "adult entertainment" industry will be all over this.
No they won't because when people actually pay, there's a necessary element of parasocial relationships there. You can't have a parasocial relationship with a fake person who doesn't even have a consistent identity.
I think one of the easiest ways to make it so that AI content is recognizable is to just require all AI generated products, be it text, images, or videos, to have a specific mark in them, not necessarily visible, but there could be some form of serial number in the code of the product, or even just something like a "made by ____" so that people, or even just other AI tools, like what you touch on around the 6 minute mark, can tell easily what it is.
problem with that is that bad actors will always find ways to subvert this. They will remove it for malicious deeds.
@@jonmaverickcruz5008 this, it might stop people without technical knowledge but for anyone else they could edit the file metadata
@@AlexiosTheSixth literially already the case but all you need to do is use windows to remove 'extra included information in the picture' and boom, picture is clean. Its a baseline windows feature. Phones probably can as well, but never tried to. The only way this works is if we choose to be suspicious of stuff with no extra information tied to them.
I can just screen record the video and edit out the watermark. Or download an AI and take out the part that adds those things. Plus it wouldnt stop the companies themselves from doing anything malicious with their own technology.
You literally described the plot of "Blade runner".
The issue is that sooner or later someone will crate an AI generator that will not be putting those watermarks.
As someone in cybersecurity, we are having some real trouble keeping up and I'm terrified.
I genuinely cannot think of a SINGLE good effect this has on anything and I can think of way too many horrendous things that it WILL and IS ALREADY causing. fantastic world we live in.
I can think of one, people will interact less online and more in person to prove that they are real.
Cry more 😂😂
@@drippyog3935 I am so sick of these types of emotionally distant responses. Go outside.
I think, at this point, it should be the responsibility of OpenAI and similar companies to place something in the meta data for anything made by AI to be easily identifiable. This could still be misused but the layman wouldn't doing anything to obfuscate that meta data. This would at least smooth over a lot of potential misuses of generative ai.
The layman would be able to use a tool that _will_ be made by the non-layman to just strip that metadata. This isn't a solution - the solution is for this stuff to be recognised as having earth-shattering potentially disastrous consequences and for it to stop now. This is coming from someone in tech. "Move fast and break things" has gone too far - let's not break our world and slow this down a few dozen times.
Even if OpenAI are completely committed to what they've said they are with their tests of this model, red teamers obviously aren't able to simulate the effect this is going to have on society. This is dangerous and needs to be stopped.
I'd like to add - when I say earth-shattering, I mean it. There have been models which can take a person's face against a white background and, with 70% accuracy, predict political leanings and sexual orientation, which flies in the face of everything we'd like to believe about ourselves.
It doesn't matter whether it's _true_ that you can judge a book by its cover (and it has to be true, or how else has the model managed it?), we simply shouldn't want to live in that world, because AI-proven racism is probably going to follow. If troubling things like racism - things completely counter to our collective beliefs (I'd hope) - are proven objectively correct, it comes down to whether we just accept that or rebel and continue to live the way we've been living, ignoring the fact that it's objectively wrong in favour of it feeling morally better. I choose to rebel, and so should you.
that won’t stop open source or unregulated countries. there is literally nothing that can be done, short of removing all privacy and surveying everyone 24/7.
@@ccaagg When sentient AI really takes off I would honestly be shocked if it DIDN'T get rid of us all. It takes some cognitive dissonance to know all the bad things about humanity and NOT be a nihilist.
You could really argue that the "good" things about humanity could never outweigh all the "bad" and I think it could be objectively true from a pure data perspective. We are so destructive to the planet and ourselves. I doubt that sentient AI will have that special touch of madness that allows for faith in humanity despite everything.
@@ccaagg this will never work saying “just stop pls” is even a worse idea than what the OP said, you aren’t going to get every country on the planet to agree to stop this. This is the next arms race. Look how much China is investing into AI, the USA would be stupid as fuck to stop progress on it and it ultimately just won’t happen. Pandora’s box is open, preparing for how to deal with a new economy and post capitalism needs to be discussed.
7:18-8:20 Perfectly said... All the possibilities to use this nefariously scares me
Speaking of AI generated videos, all those science channels with the pfp that has a symbol and black background are all AI generated, the video, the voice, the text, everything.
It's so unfortunate that science channels have started getting into AI, like that Niles Red guy is an AI supporter. STEM people truly don't care about humanity.
The amount of content farm channels that are going to be made with this is going to unreal
Maybe sometime this year a solar flare will wipe out our main computer systems and we won’t have to worry about ai for a while
Please don't be so depressed.
Praying for this honestly
One day we will see another CaptainSparklez's LP series - The only way we know it's AI, will be when Jardon changes from armor to elytra and doesn'T open the inventory to do that.
I cant even process this
Yeah
Lemme help: F***!!!
Completely off topic, but I can't believe that a guy who did Minecraft videos I watched as a kid is still around over a decade later. It's a strange kind of feeling.
As someone who wants to go into computer science, specifically programming this REALLY scares me.
And as someone who's been in the CS field for 15 years, these developments have me looking to get out!!
I recommend that you just do what you enjoy, and find a simple way to use your skills like helping animals. Scale down but help where it matters. It’s not worth engaging or worrying about this stuff when it’s outside your control. Imagine if you were a poor farmer in star wars while the death star blows up planets near by, it’s crazy but you wouldn’t be wasting time worrying about
don't be, I'm also a developer, but if they can replace our job, it means they would be extremely close to being able to replace everything, and with that probably very soon they would be able to replace everything and then no jobs by anyone would be required
@@qtipextraas an expert in this field, how the fudge does a layman deal with this? How can we identify it? If this is what is publicly available, do you think that governments and other entities have much more advanced AI tech which is not publicly known about
@@shoazdon7000 Yes, that is the scariest part of it! What is public can and will be abused, but its the stuff that isnt that you really have to be worried about. We'll just have to assume everything is curated by AI for specific purposes (that we won't necessarily be privy to) that will lead to mass manipulation (already happing on some levels). How to deal with it? 2 things really.. Try to stay up on it, learn about it, be aware of it, try to adapt to it, and go on with life as normal. But while you're doing that, build up an off-grid backup plan.. I dont mean like a cabin in the woods, but more simply just like, come up with ideas for work/living/communications/social/etc. that doesn't require the internet or technology.
Aw shweet man made horrors perfectly within my comprehension
My only idea they could do similiar to a watermark to identify when a video is ai generated, is to have incredibly tiny digital imprints in the frames of the videos that aren't noticeable my human vision, but can be detected by technology intended to look for them
I'm not sure if that came across the way I wanted, but hoping that's close to something they'll do to seperate the videos from reality, at least in a court case and so on
upcoming isn't the age of abundance, upcoming is the age of nihilism, here we go
It became popular to ditch morality and get more "progressive" with what was considered evil. This is where we ended up. Unless we unanimously decide to boycott this crap I can't think of anything optimistic. The common man can keep arguing about how this technology will do more harm than good but unless we act, they won't listen to us.
I have a feeling a lot of things are gonna become a lot less digital and a lot less connected.
Schools will have to have kids in person so they can see them write the essays to make sure they aren't ai generated, security cameras will have to use old school technology to store pictures as physical without any digitization to prove they're real, More intranets between close friends that know that eachother irl to stay connected, No more mmo or internet games instead going back to the old LAN parties for multiplayer, Artists will go back to old physical paintings, Photographers will go back to old school camera tech same as security cameras.
Generally lots will go back to how it was in the 2000s and and 1970s, If that's a good thing? Who knows, but many neglected technologies will get new life and research for them, and that's definitely good.
Of course, this is just my guess.
Walkman comeback?
I kind of hope this is the case for many reasons. Mostly because it would benefit society in ways we much need right now.
That is quite an interesting view.
Except for the MMO or internet games, I don't really how AI will makes player stop play thoses
It's almost poetic to think about a world where progress went so far, we needed to go back so that our society don't collapse
@NightmarAkashi Because of bot cheaters mainly, you won't be able to play without getting stomped by 3 clones of the best fps player that ever was for example.
@@gabrielc7861 Oh interesting. Indeed cheating would be quite problematic even if it's not for all genre
I’m an art student studying 3D modeling and FX for media, we’re all now horribly worried because our entire career is in jeopardy.
What is going on
I'm in exactly same situation, I only started studying 3D, and this crap happed
I love refreshing to see a new vid from jordan
Will Smith eating pasta is legit the funniest thing I've seen this year so far.
Crazy to still be watching your channel after like 10 years, I appreciate how you've evolved your content & I appreciate your take here!! I hate AI so bad & it scares me
I just had a distopian idea... What if in the future law enforcement has false security camera footage. AI could make the perfect heist or frame someone beyond a reasonable doubt.
this could be verified by asking the surveillance footages from CCTV from the area where the video suggested the crime occurred. of course not every area will have CCTV coverage. also they could check the suspect phone location and other history activities. in order to perfectly frame somebody, you would need to know their daily activity.
@@STCatchMeTRACjRo I'm suggesting replaced CCTV footage. A lot of the voice AI can route in a voice then edit it. It stands to reason you will be able to route video in and have it edit it
@@STCatchMeTRACjRo I feel like an issue would be trusting police to verify the evidence. It's not unheard of for departments to falsify evidence or check the authenticity of evidence, combined with the general trust that evidence provided by the police is authentic.
@@trainerkam3218eh its inevitable that video and pictures will be completely unusable in court eventually. If we cant use lie detectors in court we definitely cant keep using images and videos.
@@apothic0n With how much investment the government and businesses have put into establishing security cameras everywhere, I highly doubt that. It'd be more likely that camera footage by citizens would be discredited as evidence then footage provided by government agencies or businesses
The dystopia is WAY TOO OBVIOUS but no one is making any restriction on it.