Acing a consulting case live so you can just copy me (BCG R2)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 12 чер 2024
  • Link to the case in this video (page 58): economics.virginia.edu/sites/...
    The Most Comprehensive Beginner’s Guide to Consulting in 2024: • The Most Comprehensive...
    FREE 1-month casing roadmap that I've made for my viewers (just enter $0 in the price box): matt-huangs-store.sellfy.store/
    Music from Epidemic Sound → use link for FREE 30 day trial share.epidemicsound.com/ohdjti
    My filming gear:
    Camera (just my iPhone): amzn.to/3LvSTNl
    Portable microphone: amzn.to/3SYXDzQ
    Podcasting mic: amzn.to/3LrjOtU
    Tripod: amzn.to/47wHVA4
    DJI iphone gimbal (for cinematic shots): amzn.to/3PexTfa
    Lighting kit: amzn.to/46bF0Mf
    Note: This video is not sponsored. Some of the links above may be affiliate, meaning I could earn a small % of sales if you purchase products via the link
    #consulting #managementconsulting #caseinterview
    TIMESTAMPS
    0:00 Intro
    0:31 An important note
    0:56 Case introduction
    1:19 Restate context and ask clarifying Qs
    4:38 Develop a framework
    9:07 Analyzing unit economics
    12:45 A common mistake people make
    13:59 Analyzing customer preferences
    15:20 Brainstorming portion
    18:20 Synthesis and closing the case
    Current Sub Count: 1,897

КОМЕНТАРІ • 50

  • @noa_7581
    @noa_7581 Місяць тому +4

    I love how calm you speak and down to earth.

  • @MyFavK-Artist
    @MyFavK-Artist 3 місяці тому +2

    I'm blown away by the structure of the video. It is incredibly organized and easy for beginners to follow along your thought process. I really enjoyed and learned a lot from the video and has been hooked ever since randomly coming across one of your videos.
    Thank you so much!

    • @matthuang21
      @matthuang21  3 місяці тому

      Wow thanks for the comment!! I’m glad you found the video super helpful, I’ll keep this in mind as I plan for future content

  • @mikehawk8338
    @mikehawk8338 5 місяців тому

    Great video, Matt! Your content consistently impresses with valuable insights. Thanks for your dedication, keep up the excellent work!

    • @matthuang21
      @matthuang21  5 місяців тому +1

      thanks Mike! Appreciate the support - stay tuned for more!

  • @enricotoma5043
    @enricotoma5043 5 місяців тому +1

    Thank you so much Matt! I'd love if it there would be more videos like this in the future.

    • @matthuang21
      @matthuang21  5 місяців тому

      Thanks Enrico! Will keep this in mind for future vids 🙏

  • @JensjensdnnsnNnnN
    @JensjensdnnsnNnnN 2 місяці тому

    Hey Matt, havent had the time to watch your videos in a while! I'll catch up on them today! You seem like the type of guy i'd enjoy having around me. Have a great day!

    • @matthuang21
      @matthuang21  2 місяці тому

      Hey Emil! Good to hear from you - hope you’re doing well!

  • @SeanTran
    @SeanTran 5 місяців тому

    I have done this exact case, love seeing your perspective on it!

    • @matthuang21
      @matthuang21  5 місяців тому

      Thanks Sean! What a coincidence!

  • @yurrhurrd
    @yurrhurrd 5 місяців тому +3

    Great video Matt! Would you mind making a video discussing the different types of frameworks and when/how we should use them?

    • @matthuang21
      @matthuang21  5 місяців тому

      Thanks man! I’ll keep this idea in mind for future videos

  • @MuffinLover1999
    @MuffinLover1999 3 місяці тому

    Thank you so much Matt!

  • @seansummers8107
    @seansummers8107 5 місяців тому

    Great video Matt!

    • @matthuang21
      @matthuang21  5 місяців тому

      Hey Sean! Appreciate the kind words, glad you found it helpful. Hope you’re enjoying winter break!

  • @forthechickens
    @forthechickens Місяць тому +1

    Hi! I’m a high school student trying to learn more about the consulting industry and your videos have been really helpful for me. Thanks and keep it up!

  • @David-ey7xx
    @David-ey7xx 5 місяців тому

    enjoy your videos, keep up the good work.

    • @matthuang21
      @matthuang21  5 місяців тому

      Thanks David! Appreciate you being here!

  • @biboba9976
    @biboba9976 3 місяці тому

    We need more videos like this one please

  • @user-zk7vl1te2m
    @user-zk7vl1te2m 4 місяці тому

    Awesome video Matt, can't wait to see more case walk-throughs . Any tips on how to better brainstorm solutions?

    • @matthuang21
      @matthuang21  4 місяці тому +1

      Thanks Rafael - glad you found it helpful. Getting good at brainstorming is just going to come through practice and also developing your "business sense", which means understanding what options a business has in different situations. It's hard to teach this, so I would just focus on reading through the solutions to cases with brainstorming sections and trying to understand and remember each option so that in the future you have more ideas to draw from. Hope this helps!

    • @user-zk7vl1te2m
      @user-zk7vl1te2m 4 місяці тому

      you're the best, thanks!@@matthuang21

  • @NICOLONDOTO
    @NICOLONDOTO 4 години тому

    Hi! In the bullet points you put differentiators twice. I understand you can't repeat items. What would you change there?

  • @angeloargento1445
    @angeloargento1445 Місяць тому

    Excellent video Matt! When you have time would you do another video of this type maybe with a different case?
    Anyway thanks a lot for this great video 🔥

    • @matthuang21
      @matthuang21  Місяць тому +1

      Thanks for the suggestion - will keep this in mind!

  • @nguyentranbaokhanh6522
    @nguyentranbaokhanh6522 5 місяців тому +2

    you should definitely continue this cracking case interviews series! i love the video

    • @matthuang21
      @matthuang21  5 місяців тому

      Glad you liked it! This is just the first of this type of video, planning to make more - stay tuned!

  • @moff_gideon
    @moff_gideon 5 місяців тому

    This type of framework is also helpful in interviews for big tech strategy & ops roles

    • @matthuang21
      @matthuang21  5 місяців тому

      Good to know 🙂 will keep this in mind if I ever interview for tech roles. Thanks for watching!

  • @oneandonlyflow
    @oneandonlyflow 29 днів тому +1

    Suppose you didn't have a pillar specifically for the product's unit economics. In that case, in a candidate-led interview, would the interviewer still try to steer you into that direction so they can ask you to analyze data?
    For example, instead of 'unit economics' what I noted down in my memo was "exploring other price lines for CupCo's products".

    • @matthuang21
      @matthuang21  26 днів тому

      In most cases, yes I think the interviewer would try to steer you in that direction, especially if analyzing unit economics was a big part of the case. Whenever you think of price, you should also consider costs as well, since those two go hand in hand when we think about profitability.

  • @Ts-fw9og
    @Ts-fw9og 21 годину тому

    hey! love your videos and energy.
    Why did u pick this specific framework (CCCP)?
    There are so many frameworks out there, how would u know which one to pick?

    • @matthuang21
      @matthuang21  6 годин тому

      Thanks for the comment! I picked it because it's easy for beginners to learn and works with 90% of business cases. There are other frameworks that could work too.

  • @spashdad
    @spashdad 4 місяці тому

    So i really liked the cases. Its been years i even did one. With the conclusion i believe your stance could be made first then followed by the supporting evidence as to why you make the recommendation and then follow up with risk or and next steps

    • @matthuang21
      @matthuang21  4 місяці тому

      Hey Owura! Thanks for the comment, glad you liked the video!

  • @kaiyuan2893
    @kaiyuan2893 Місяць тому

    I see a lot of synthesis structure with the recommendation before findings in the spirit of top down, what are your thoughts on this?

    • @matthuang21
      @matthuang21  29 днів тому +1

      Either method works, you can do it top down or bottom up as long as you keep it concise

  • @A.L888
    @A.L888 День тому

    Hi Matt! Thanks for this breakdown - super helpful. I had two questions if that’s alright.
    1. How would the case have looked if you didn’t happen to start with the product bucket of the framework? I know the keys to the case were in this bucket, so if you started off with competitor for example would you just be gathering general data until you got to product? And is that why the case in relatively shorter than average (I tend to see 30ish mins)
    2. Do you think taking a minute or two to go through the entire framework has value? I hear some advice against it as it might come across like you don’t know how to apply a framework but rather just memorized them all
    Thank you so much for your help!

    • @matthuang21
      @matthuang21  6 годин тому

      1. If I didn't start at the product bucket, I would have asked about a different one (e.g., customer) and the interviewer would have likely given me feedback redirecting me away from that bucket (e.g., "we don't have any data on price elasticity"), and i would have continued down my framework until I uncovered that we have product level data available with which to conduct the analysis. This is also why it's important to invite the interviewer to react, even if it's a simple "what's going through my head right now is that...how does that sound to you?" and to be aware enough to notice that if there's a lack of data in a certain area, it may be an indication that you should try another bucket in your framework (don't get too caught up on one). Hope this somewhat makes sense.
      2. I see no issues with restating the context before your recommendation as long as you are concise - for me it helps ground myself and establishes clear context for what you will say next. Take this with a grain of salt, but I have personally never received negative feedback regarding this practice. That said, you can definitely deliver the synthesis at the end without the context in the beginning (personal preference).

  • @maxb9650
    @maxb9650 5 місяців тому

    Does the interviewer just evaluate your results or is it also about how you are adressing the topic and how u structure your approach?

    • @matthuang21
      @matthuang21  5 місяців тому +2

      Hey Max! How you address the topic and structure the approach is the most important - as long as you can justify your thinking and demonstrate you can think logically about a problem, the interviewer will view that positively. That said, they usually have an idea of what the general "right answer" or direction you should be headed in is, so yes - it does matter what your results are. This is especially the case if there are lots of quant sections where you either do the math right or wrong (e.g, if you're given an exhibit with specific numbers and asked to calculate how many units the company needs to sell to break-even). Hope this helps!

    • @maxb9650
      @maxb9650 5 місяців тому

      @@matthuang21 thanks for your fast reply

  • @eprohoda
    @eprohoda 5 місяців тому

    woohoo! pro ~ talk to you soon,

  • @yongyang3964
    @yongyang3964 5 місяців тому

    Love your well structured thoughts. Draw on knowledge from mircroeconomics /financial ratio /strategic management 😊

    • @matthuang21
      @matthuang21  5 місяців тому

      Hey Yong! Glad you found it helpful - appreciate the kind words