Huh. This priest is giving false theology from Vatican II, and you should know better. He just said that there was only one Mass, mystically present through all time, and he equated that Mass with the Last Supper. That is heresy. The Mass is the sacrifice of Calvary. We are not all mystically present at the Last Supper. We are all mystically present at the foot of the Cross. Dude, how did you not catch that?
Attending a Catholic Mass is like being invited to The Last Supper with God and His apostles. Receiving Him in Holy Communion is the most beautiful, powerful and intimate union we can have with Him while on earth. Beautiful Faith!!!
Father's tip - do the readings before the Mass - I used to think that was unnecessary. But recently, one morning I did this. Father is right! My anticipation of the readings drew me in as I heard them in Mass and impacted me greatly. I am making this a new habit. Thanks for this presentation!
I have my own Roman Missals that I bring to Sunday and Daily Mass. It helps to have the readings in advance, and to read the Churchs' teaching before Mass.
Dr. Brant Petri gives a deep explanation of the weekly readings. Using typology he explains how the Old Testament covenants are finalized in the everlasting Covenant in Jesus's Blood. He puts it all together beautifully. The full videos can be found on Catholic Productions and partial videos on UA-cam.
I left the Catholic Church in 1979. I studied and went to Bible college and seminary and pastored Assemblies of God Churches for 39 years. But....at retirement I felt empty. Why? I missed the reverence of the RCC. I began to study those Scriptures again that spoke of the Eucharist, in addition, I began an intense study of early Church history. The result? I must "confess" That the Catholic Church is in fact the true Church. By no means am I saying that if you are not Catholic you are damned to hell. What I am saying is if you sincerely want to be as close as possible to how the early church worshipped you should strongly consider the Catholic church. If you do nothing else, study the Bible and church history for yourself and then make your decision. I also urge you to sincerely pray.
Thanks John for being so honest. I also think with the Catholic Church that there is a treasure trove of writers, saints, theology. And let's face it, most visions are experienced by Catholic children, with shrines around the world (eg. Our Lady of Champion, Fatima, Lourdes, Medjugorje)visited by millions. I think that says it all.
Im in tears. Ive been Catholic since birth, but i never realized the mass was bringing us to the cross. Im absolutely mindblown. Thank you, thank you, thank you!!!❤
Absolutely the best way to explain mass and what happens there. I especially liked the priest's comment about God brushing away time and space. I have always felt that we are truly present at the Cross because His sacrifice on the Cross broke through time and space so we could be there. And we are--at Mass. As far as being bored. When I was young I could get bored. As a child I was constantly asking my mother when it would be over. As a much older adult I am in awe of the Mass and what is happening there. I could never go to a protestant Sunday service and get anything out of it. They are just plain DULL! A few prayers, and few hymns and a long talk about a verse or two from the bible. The Bible is all. Occasionally they will have their idea of communion, usually a symbol only kind of thing. Not the real deal! Glad I am Catholic and have come to a more understanding of the Mass and what is going on there. The only true worship to God.
Lord Jesus, You are the center of our life; we do so adore You...we trust You, we try to never make a decision without Your guidance. Thank you for the many blessings & grace You have given to us. Your Mother's presence, too, is a gift beyond description. We are grateful, O Holy One, we pray we express our gratitude through our everyday life in our actions, mercy & love. ♡
@@tatie7604 True, but I want The Latin Mass for more than the language, I like the priest facing the same way as the layman, like a general leading us into battle. And I prefer no jokes from the priest, I never get them at Latin Mass. All priests should limit their repertoire of jokes to only the ones St John told the Blessed Mother on the day her son hung from the cross
@tatie7604 Jesus and the Apostles spoke Aramaic. It was the vernacular in and around Jerusalem and Judea. In the Temple, they mostly spoke Hebrew. When they wrote, it was usually in Hebrew or Koine Greek. Knowing Aramaic helps to better understand the New Testament, as does Koine Greek and Hebrew. It is very difficult to interpret the Bible accurately without knowing all three, as they were spoken in the first century.
i'm praying that we all will return with reverence and excited anticipation to the Eucharist, whatever valid form or language its celebrated in. Attachment to only one form is idolatry because we worship God present in sacrament, word and people not in thee form-which by the way the TLM-Tridentine is about 500 yearss old not ancient and not the language or form of the ancient Apostolic church.
"The Mass is the sacrifice of Calvary perpetuated, re-presented, continued, on all the altars in the Mystical immolation of Jesus Christ." - St. Peter Julian Eymard, Apostle of the Eucharist
Thank you. Thank God there is another Catholic present in this room. This priest just falsely stated that the Mass is the Last Supper, mystically present throughout time. No, it's the sacrifice of Calvary, and we're all mystically present at the foot of the Cross, not at the Last Supper. The Mass is a sacrifice, not a supper.
The Mass transports to us across time the Last Supper, Calvary, and Easter morning, set in the backdrop of the Old and New Testaments. The Traditional Latin Rite unites all across the world and across time in form and substance.
Yes, Catholics are citizens amongst the Saints in Gods household. Eph 2:19-22 Jesus Christ taught we are to remain in His Doctrine that He set in His Church and receive His Sacraments or WE DO NOT HAVE GOD. 2 Jn 1:9, Gal1:6-9, Jn 3:5, 6:51-59, 1 Cor 11:23-29, Jn 20:21-23, 2 Cor 5:18-20 in His One True Apostolic Catholic Church-Jn 10:16, 17:20-26, Eph 4:4-6. Salvation is by loving God enough to live His Commandments, Church, Sacraments, Doctrine, Teaching, doing His works, having faith, receiving His grace, love and Unfathomable Mercy!
I noticed the priest at the consecration says it differently than a Protestant minister. I’m not an English major, so I looked up the tense used by the priest. It’s the Future-Progressive Tense i.e. “ In the future, I will be playing tennis.” “ This is my body which, WILL BE, given up for you”. This event is on going and it puts the priest hours before ( back to the last Supper) the real event, that has yet to happen. and will be happening in the future, every time a priest calls down Jesus… like when Jesus told the Apostles, what was going to happen to him very shortly. The sacrifice is always ON GOING. Protestant language always says “ is given “ the body of Jesus is given to you. Sorry, maybe I’m way out in Space on this!
Catholic priests say it the way it has been said for well over a thousand years. Only ordained Catholic priests have the ability to confect the bread and wine into the body and blood of Jesus. Catholic priests, through Apostolic succession, can trace their ordination back through history to one of the Apostles and to Jesus. The Eucharist is only available through the Catholic Church.
@@jeffscully50613 Small correction. The Orthodox Church has a valid Eucharist as well.The Consecration of the Eucharist during the divine liturgy of both the Eastern Catholic churches and the Eastern Orthodox churches is valid.
@@raymondvasquez6967 It's all Catholic. There are 23 different Catholic rites. The Orthodox churches all come from Jesus' one, holy, catholic, and Apostolic Church. They have valid ordination of bishops, who can trace their ordination back to the Apostles.
@@jeffscully50613 No, it is not. Eastern-rite Catholics are part of the Catholic Church, despite differences in custom and liturgical practice from Western Catholics. While Eastern Orthodox Christians have much in common with Catholics, they’re still in schism-they’ve split off from the legitimate authority of the pope-and therefore aren’t Catholics. Can Roman Catholics receive communion at an Orthodox church? Yes, but like anyone else, they must first go through the process of joining the Orthodox Church, which involves setting aside former church memberships. Non-Orthodox Christians of any sort may not receive communion at an Orthodox church without doing this. There are no “walk-ins” for communion. At the same time, Orthodox Christians are also not permitted to commune anywhere but in an Orthodox church, and they also have to be prepared by prayer, fasting and a recent confession If you also note, while the Orthodox Church has remained stagnant in terms of growth, the Catholic Church is growing - while becoming less European and American, it is growing in continents such as Africa and Asia, a testament to the Holy Spirit working in His Church.
In heaven we get the beatific vision of God the Father. That is a never ending joy beyond any expectation. In heaven we get to be with Jesus Christ in a most intimate way of holy communion. This union is beyond the great love we experience in marriage and children. Yet it is a similar type of bond that the bride church gets to live in paradise. In heaven we get to be filled with the Holy Spirit who will enhance our animation with love as pure as the angels. In heaven we will be full of Grace along with The Blessed Mother. When Jesus proclaimed the Good News he was truly proclaiming the Kingdom we are called to. Carry your cross with heaven in mind and let’s try to spread the Good News!
Reading scripture in context is so important! Chapter 6 :63 of the book of John tells us: Jesus is-speaking spiritually about the bread we celebrate in remembrance of Him-and then when you connect the passage of John 14:26 Jesus promises us the Holy Spirit when he left this earth! Furthermore,Jesus completed the 1 sacrifice: verse 12 of chapter 10 Hebrews states: “ but when this priest/Jesus had offered for all time one sacrifice for sins, he said down at the right hand of God!” He said on the cross: “It is finished”! John 19:30 No more representations or sacrifices are needed; He leaves us the Holy Spirit! We are awaiting the 2nd coming! He is with the Father in Heaven until He comes in Glory! Hebrews 1:3 …. “And He had provided purification for sins, He sat down at the right hand of the Majesty on high.” Only through reading the word can we have clarity. 🙏🏻💫📖
Your interpretation does not negate Gods Truth. You can’t pick one verse to support your claim. Jesus Christ told His apostles at The Last Supper to continue His offerings until He returns. Jesus was not talking about His Flesh in Jn 6:64. John 6:63 Then what if you were to see the Son of man ascending to where he was before? John 6:64 It is the Spirit who gives life. The flesh does not offer anything of benefit. The words that I have spoken to you are spirit and life. John 6:51 I am the living bread, who descended from heaven. 6:52 If anyone eats from this bread, he shall live in eternity. And the bread that I will give is my FLESH, for the life of the world.” 6:53 Therefore, the Jews debated among themselves, saying, “How can this man give us his flesh to eat?” 6:54 And so, Jesus said to them: “Amen, amen, I say to you, UNLESS YOU EAT THE FLESH OF THE SON OF MAN AND DRINK HIS BLOOD, YOU WILL NOT HAVE LIFE IN YOU. 6:55 Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up on the last day. 6:56 For my flesh is true food, and my blood is true drink. 6:57 Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood abides in me, and I in him. 6:58 Just as the living Father has sent me and I live because of the Father, so also whoever eats me, the same shall live because of me. 6:59 This is the bread that descends from heaven. It is not like the manna that your fathers ate, for they died. Whoever eats this bread shall live forever.” People left Jesus as they knew He was not speaking metaphorically. He doubled down several times that He meant literally to eat and drink of Him for eternal life. The Transubstantiation occurs when the Priest blesses the bread and wine, transforming them into The Body and Blood of Jesus Christ, our God and Savior. 1 Corinthians 11:23 For I have received from the Lord what I have also delivered to you: that the Lord Jesus, on the same night that he was handed over, took bread, 11:24 and giving thanks, he broke it, and said: “Take and eat. This is my body, which SHALL BE GIVEN UP FOR YOU. Do this in remembrance of me.” 11:25 Similarly also, the cup, after he had eaten supper, saying: “This cup is the new covenant in my blood. Do this, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of me.” 11:26 For whenever you eat this bread and drink this cup, you proclaim the death of the Lord, UNTIL HE RETURNS. 11:27 And so, whoever eats this bread, or drinks from the cup of the Lord, UNWORTHILY, SHALL BE LIABLE FOR THE BODY AND BLOOD OF THE LORD. 11:28 But let a man examine himself, and, in this way, let him eat from that bread, and drink from that cup. 11:29 For whoever eats and drinks unworthily, EATS and DRINKS A SENTENCE AGAINST HIMSELF, NOT DISCERNING IT TO BE THE BODY OF THE LORD.
Prepare for the Mass also by considering those sins your going to ask forgiveness for at the Mass, because at that point in the Mass we only get a few seconds if that to reflect - and our venial sins are forgiven at each mass but how much more special is it that we know what those are as we are offering up the Mass.... and by considering for what or whom are you going to offer this particular Mass up for?
Notice past, present, and future in this verse along with a divine act transformed by divine words into a divine living present eternity that gets consumed in the body, and infused, or communed, into the spirit, so that unity is achieved between the church and the Lord. At the same time, a divine proclamation of the death and resurrection of Christ goes forth into all of God's creation. 1 Corinthians 11:26 NRSV-CI [26] For as often as you eat this bread and drink the cup, you proclaim the Lord's death until he comes.
Transubstitiation happens during the offering of the Eucaristic Host and wine. Transforming these to becoming the body and blood of Jesus Christ. To receive these one must make peace with GOD a.k.a. confession. Ask a Priest, because communion is a serious and crucial time that Jesus Christ spends with His followers. He becomes one with them.
A serious question from a serious believer. If John 6:52-53 are to be taken literally, does that mean that non-Catholics have no chance of eternal life?
the good thief was saved, salvation is offered to all who confess their sin and repent, believe in Christ, and Christ lives in those who not just profess but who also do the will of Christ. Yet many people reject Christ (sin) and reject Christ’s Church and the Sacraments which offer sanctification, growth in grace, holiness and virtue by receiving the Body/Blood/Soul and Divinity of Christ (life within you) in a state of grace, a pure gift but a gift which can be rejected as Judas did at the Last Supper. Confession of sin, repentance, faith and love is the difference between a wedding day and marriage…daily pick up your cross…love sacrificially- this is the good news - to receive Christ in the Eucharist, to be present for the timeless Pasch and live out the Paschal mystery each day is LIFE to the FULL. A wedding is the beginning of a marriage but it is not living a married life
Rutherglen road, well the church already teaches that outside the church there is no salvation. Only problem is that teaching isn't found anywhere in scripture. The church makes many claims not based on scripture. Salvation is not through a church but by the blood of Jesus Christ.
389 I Am the Church. The Church was founded by Me and it can never die Saturday, April 7th, 2012 @ 10:00 My dearly beloved daughter, the schism I spoke of has begun in the Catholic Church. My Teachings, which have never changed since My Holy Scriptures ended with the Book of Revelation, are now being challenged. There have been a number of challenges, opinions and theological assessments of My Holy Word throughout the centuries. Many fine men questioned the instructions and the Teachings, which I imparted to mankind. Some of My Teachings were taken apart, analysed, new interpretations sought and then accepted. Yet this has been unnecessary, for the Truth was given to man by the prophets who came before Me and then by Me during My time on Earth. The Truth has never changed. The Truth is simple. Other information, not contained in Holy Scripture was given, as a Gift to the world, through chosen souls, for one reason only. To help you contemplate on My Sacrifice for mankind and to show and remind you of the Love I hold in My Heart for all of God’s children. Any Divine Revelations given to the world today are to help you prepare for Eternal Life. My Teachings, honoured by the Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church, are now being attacked in the first of many challenges, which will result in the division of the Church. New laws will be introduced to suit modern opinion and so that they sit comfortably with those who, with pride in their souls, feel a need to pacify mankind, rather than show obedience to the Teachings of the Church. I Am the Church. The Church was founded by Me and it can never die. Many, including those from within, as well as from outside the Church, will attempt to break down its structure. Pray that My Holy Vicar, Pope Benedict XVI, will remain strong amidst the opposition he now faces. This is a deliberate attempt, by those connected with the false prophet, to create a new church. These cunning people will have you believe it will be the same Church, but it cannot be. How can My Church, with new laws, twisted versions of the Truth I gave to the world, represent Me? It can’t. This is why My Father will direct His Church, the true, loyal believers, from the Heavens. He will hold the keys, until the Second Coming, when the New Jerusalem will rise, the One True Catholic Church, out of the ashes to be reclaimed by all of God’s children, all religions, all creeds as one. This is the way it was meant to be in full and final union in the New Era of Peace on Earth. Your beloved Jesus Christ
@@rbnmnt3341 You have to answer the question, what is the Catholic (Universal) Church and who is a part of that. You also must realize that there was no Bible for the first 300 years. What or who did those Christians rely on for teaching? That is why the Church uses both Scripture and tradition. Scripture alone is nowhere in the Bible. The Catholic Church teaches that Salvation is through Christ. None of us can even come close to understanding the depth and width of God's mercy.
@@cindychronis7857 the catholic universal church is NOT synonymous with the universal church Christ established. The church likes to pedal that false propaganda because it's not supported by scripture. Jesus said "upon this rock I will build my church". Note, Jesus did not say "I will build my catholic church". Jesus mentions no religion or denomination . Your church has just inserted itself into scripture to pedal that lie. Scripture does not mention catholicism, much less the papacy. The church that Christ founded is the worldwide body of believers and not a physical church which Rome has established. If you read in the gospel of Luke you will see that there was a strife amongst the apostles. What was this strife about? The apostles, peter included, were contending as to who should be the greatest among them. What??? The greatest? I thought peter was the pope? Why was he involved in the strife? Didn't the other apostles know that Peter was the pope? Of course not. Did Jesus stand up and defend his "pope" or the papacy? Jesus did no such thing. Next point on this matter. Jesus had already declared who HE thought was the greatest. In the gospel of Matthew Jesus said this. "Verily I say unto you, of them born of women,there has not risen a greater than John the Baptist". So biblically speaking, who was the greatest? Jesus never said anything remotely close to that about peter. I wonder why John was the one chosen to prepare the way of the Lord?. It makes no sense for Jesus to appoint peter as the pope in Matthew 16 and a few verses later Jesus rebuked him. Rebuked by saying "get behind me Satan". The pope is nothing but a myth ok cal position appointed by Rome. Who the pope himself claims everyone shou lad be subject to and who says he is the vicar of Christ. You won't find that in scripture. When Jesus ascended he prayed to the Father who sent the Holy Spirit to be with us til the end of time. Please show me the scripture I missed that says the pope was left in charge of the church. Let's not forget that peter rejected cornelius'gestures when he tried to homage to him. Peter helped coronavirus stand up and said stand up, I am a man just like you. Peter never referred to himself as a pope. Peter calls himself a servant, an apostle, a fellow elder and a man as he did to Cornelius. Peter was never called the pope by Jesus, the apostles or even Mary. I guess the most important question to you is this. Where does scripture say Jesus, the apostles or Mary were catholic? If you read closely everything scripture says points to them being Jewish. No record of any conversion, peter or anyone doing anything "catholic" in the bible. Peter never said a mass. Mary didn't baptize Jesus as an infant. Catholicism does not exist biblically.
At 7:30, this is what I personally believe, That the Sacrifice at the Cross is Timeless and not bound by a time constraint, applicable to all the Eucharistic sacrifices at the altar by this one and only self sufficient sacrifice.... In the last few days, i found myself deeply saddened because of the word Renactment and Representation regarding the Eucharist, i feel like the justification for the sameness between the sacrifice of the mass and of the cross on ground of same victim and same offerer a little ambiguous, rather i believe, it should have mentioned clearly that the sacrifice at the cross and at the altar are the same, since it is the same sacrifice 2000 years ago that is brought at the altar or we being brought to the Calvary. Is there anyone who can help me, I'm in a crisis of faith not regarding the real presence but regarding what is really present i.e Which Sacrifice? Which Christ, the Christ of the cross or the Christ of the Resurrection? If it is the Christ of the Resurrection, woukd it mean that it is a new sacrifice?
Jesus Christ told His apostles at The Last Supper to continue His offerings until He returns. John 6:51 I am the living bread, who descended from heaven. 6:52 If anyone eats from this bread, he shall live in eternity. And the bread that I will give is my FLESH, for the life of the world.” 6:53 Therefore, the Jews debated among themselves, saying, “How can this man give us his flesh to eat?” 6:54 And so, Jesus said to them: “Amen, amen, I say to you, UNLESS YOU EAT THE FLESH OF THE SON OF MAN AND DRINK HIS BLOOD, YOU WILL NOT HAVE LIFE IN YOU. 6:55 Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up on the last day. 6:56 For my flesh is true food, and my blood is true drink. 6:57 Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood abides in me, and I in him. 6:58 Just as the living Father has sent me and I live because of the Father, so also whoever eats me, the same shall live because of me. 6:59 This is the bread that descends from heaven. It is not like the manna that your fathers ate, for they died. Whoever eats this bread shall live forever.” People left Jesus as they knew He was not speaking metaphorically. He doubled down several times that He meant literally to eat and drink of Him for eternal life. The Transubstantiation occurs when the Priest blesses the bread and wine, transforming them into The Body and Blood of Jesus Christ, our God and Savior. 1 Corinthians 11:23 For I have received from the Lord what I have also delivered to you: that the Lord Jesus, on the same night that he was handed over, took bread, 11:24 and giving thanks, he broke it, and said: “Take and eat. This is my body, which SHALL BE GIVEN UP FOR YOU. Do this in remembrance of me.” 11:25 Similarly also, the cup, after he had eaten supper, saying: “This cup is the new covenant in my blood. Do this, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of me.” 11:26 For whenever you eat this bread and drink this cup, you proclaim the death of the Lord, UNTIL HE RETURNS. 11:27 And so, whoever eats this bread, or drinks from the cup of the Lord, UNWORTHILY, SHALL BE LIABLE FOR THE BODY AND BLOOD OF THE LORD. 11:28 But let a man examine himself, and, in this way, let him eat from that bread, and drink from that cup. 11:29 For whoever eats and drinks unworthily, EATS and DRINKS A SENTENCE AGAINST HIMSELF, NOT DISCERNING IT TO BE THE BODY OF THE LORD.
What Catholic churchhave you gone to? All Catholic churches offer both body and blood-except the so-called "traditional latin Mass".Christ is present in both species but for the record we do take both.
The Bible is the inspired word of God. 1 Timothy 2:5 “For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus;” Luke 1:46-47 And Mary said, My soul doth magnify the Lord, 47 And my spirit hath rejoiced in God my Savior Romans 3:10 As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one: 1 Corinthians 10:4 “And did all drink the same spiritual drink: for they drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them: and that Rock was Christ.” 1 Samuel 2:2 “There is none holy as the LORD: for there is none beside thee: neither is there any rock like our God. Mark 7:7. “Howbeit in vain do they worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men.” 2 Timothy 2:15 “Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.” John 14:6 “Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.” 1 Timothy 4:3 “Forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain from meats, which God hath created to be received with thanksgiving of them which believe and know the truth.” 2 Timothy 3:15 “And that from a child thou hast known the holy scriptures, which are able to make thee wise unto salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus.” Matthew 4:4 But he answered and said, It is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God. Better to be a born again Christian.
Congratulations on being born again Catholics are born again the biblical way from water and spirit. Just like the Bible says. Yet some of you claim water baptism is not necessary. You have let your self be deceived by new doctrines Romans 16 " I urge you, brothers and sisters, to watch out for those who cause divisions and put obstacles in your way that are contrary to the teaching you have learned. Keep away from them. 18 For such people are not serving our Lord Christ, but their own appetites. By smooth talk and flattery they deceive the minds of naive people. 19 Everyone has heard about your obedience, so I rejoice because of you; but I want you to be wise about what is good, and innocent about what is evil. 2 Corinthians 3 But I am afraid that as the serpent deceived Eve by its cunning, your thoughts will be led astray from a sincere and purelal devotion to Christ. 4 For if someone comes and proclaims another Jesus than the one we proclaimed, or if you receive a different spirit from the one you received, or a different gospel from the one you accepted, you submit to it readily enough. 5 I think that I am not in the least inferior to these super-apostles. 6| may be untrained in speech, but not in knowledge; certainly in every way and in all things we have made this evident to you 2 Thessalonians Therefore, brethren, stand fast and hold to the traditions which ye have been taught, whether by word or our epistle. You have let yourself be deceived. Your teachings are so new, they do not hold to apostolic, early church teachings. You teach against the word of God ; baptism is important yet some of your type claims it’s not needed for salvation You claim the Eucharist is just a symbol, You are the one that holds on to the tradition of men; they taught you sola scriptura and sola fide. Those two man made traditions hold no historic value before the reformation. Before we had a Bible we had prayers to Mary( not praying to Mary) Fun fact in the early church there was a small sect called the Kollyridians or Collyridians fourth-century Arabian cult of Mary that worshiped Mary, as Epiphanius mentioned in his writing against heretics (see: Haer. 78, 23; 79). He coined the expression Collyridians which has the meaning of "cake-eater-sect." Leontius of Byzance had a different name for them. He called them "Philomarianites," meaning Mary-lovers (PG 87, 1364). The priestesses of this sect used to present Our Lady with cakes or a special kind of bread (kolluris). Epiphanius warned them: "Although Mary is the most beautiful and holy and worthy of praise, we don't owe her adoration." (Haer. 79, 7, PG 42, 752) In a different passage Epiphanius uses even stronger words: "Adoration must cease. For Mary is no goddess nor has she received her body from heaven. (oute gar theos hae Maria oute ap'ouranou exousa to soma)" (Haer. 78, 24). Collyridians are also known and mentioned by John Damascene (PG 94, 728 One mediator. What does the word mean. You take everything out of context- do you not believe the Bible is one. Inspiration by the Holy Spirit? Yet you guys jump from one sentence to another. The one mediator is referring to the one that gave his life for us , offered himself as a sacrifice. But if you read the Bible verse before that it says to pray for everyone, making us mediators between god and the person that asks for prayer. Moises was chosen by Isreal to be a mediator. Jesus chose the disciples. The Holy Spirit chose you to mediate the love of Jesus to your family. Read church history and find out how you have been deceived.
When Chris suggests that the pulpit is not the “center of the Catholic worship”, Father Riley replies, “right” which implies that the reading of the “Word of God” is of minor importance. But isn’t the Word of God, in the liturgy of the Word, of quintessential importance, as is the Eucharist, in the liturgy of the Eucharist?
That's not what the Father actually said or meant. At a Protestant "worship" it's all about the person behind the pulpit. It is all about their interpretation of scripture. The summit of a Protestant worship is the sermon. Most Protestant churches don't even have an altar. So there is no real "worship" by sacrifice being done. At a Catholic Mass the homily (sermon) is a minor part and is usually to link the reading from the Old Testament with the Gospel reading. The most important part happens AFTER the homily: The Liturgy of the Eucharist. Offering up to God the only gift we have that is worthy of his glory--His Son on the cross.
It's so not a minor part that we all stand for the Gospel, and the priest raises the book with the Gospels in it over his head to proceed from the altar to the ambo (pulpit or lectern), to be read. When the priest begins, he kisses the written word, and proclaims, "A reading from the Gospel of St. _______." Then he traces a big cross on the page. And the laity reply, "Glory to you, O Lord.", and then we cross ourselves three times with our thumb and forefinger; on our forehead, our lips, and over our heart, saying silently, "May the Gospel always be on my mind, on my lips, and in my heart." We don't sit until the priest is finished reading and proclaims, "The Gospel of the Lord." Then the laity respond, "Praise to you Lord Jesus Christ." If THAT isn't taking it seriously or making a big deal out of it, I don't know would would be.
The altar is the center and focus of the Mass. That's where the worship is conducted, just as has always been since before Abraham. The priest isn't the "star" of the show. A perfect Mass would be if nobody could remember who the priest was.
It was the night of Jewish Passover . The Passover Prayers said in the Temple in Jerusalem were His Death Prayers. Every person before execution has a last meal. He incorporated His Death into the meal. Mass is Jewish Passover Prayers said in the Temple Consecration of the last meal /Crucifixion and Resurrection. Jews had true worship they worshipped the Messiah in advance but, had the Symbolic Paschal Lamb . On the night He was betrayed He becomes the Sacrificial lamb. My opinion is the Passover Prayers said in the Temple in Jerusalem are His Death Prayers and Can't be changed.
Riley..When Jesus said in John6:53..Then Jesus said unto them, Verily,verily,I say unto you,Except you eat the flesh of the Son of man,and drink his blood,ye have no life in you. Riley...if Jesus meant it literaly...HOW ARE YOU GOING TO LITERALLY EAT JESUS FLESH AND DRINK HIS BLOOD WHILE HE WAS STILL ALIVE?!?!TELL ME HOW..?! YOU CAN'T RILEY!! UNLESS 200-3OOO YEARS LATER THE CATHOLIC CHURCH GIVES A "SPECIAL PRIEST" SOME UNKNOWN POWERS GREATER THAN THAT OF MICHAEL THE ANGEL AND SERAPHIMS TO BRING JESUS DOWN FR9M HIS
Jesus Christ did mean it literally as He doubled down several times stating He gives us His FLESH and Blood. Unless we eat His Body and drink His Blood, we will have no life in us. If we eat and drink of Him unworthily, we are liable for The Body and Blood Of Jesus Christ. Even though some of His followers left Him, because they knew He meant it literally, He doubled down. John 6:51 I am the living bread, who descended from heaven. 6:52 If anyone eats from this bread, he shall live in eternity. And the bread that I will give is my FLESH, for the life of the world.” 6:53 Therefore, the Jews debated among themselves, saying, “How can this man give us his flesh to eat?” 6:54 And so, Jesus said to them: “Amen, amen, I say to you, UNLESS YOU EAT THE FLESH OF THE SON OF MAN AND DRINK HIS BLOOD, YOU WILL NOT HAVE LIFE IN YOU. 6:55 Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up on the last day. 6:56 For my flesh is true food, and my blood is true drink. 6:57 Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood abides in me, and I in him. 6:58 Just as the living Father has sent me and I live because of the Father, so also whoever eats me, the same shall live because of me. 6:59 This is the bread that descends from heaven. It is not like the manna that your fathers ate, for they died. Whoever eats this bread shall live forever.” 1 Corinthians 11:23 For I have received from the Lord what I have also delivered to you: that the Lord Jesus, on the same night that he was handed over, took bread, 11:24 and giving thanks, he broke it, and said: “Take and eat. This is my body, which SHALL BE GIVEN UP FOR YOU. Do this in remembrance of me.” 11:25 Similarly also, the cup, after he had eaten supper, saying: “This cup is the new covenant in my blood. Do this, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of me.” 11:26 For whenever you eat this bread and drink this cup, you proclaim the death of the Lord, UNTIL HE RETURNS. 11:27 And so, whoever eats this bread, or drinks from the cup of the Lord, UNWORTHILY, SHALL BE LIABLE FOR THE BODY AND BLOOD OF THE LORD. 11:28 But let a man examine himself, and, in this way, let him eat from that bread, and drink from that cup. 11:29 For whoever eats and drinks unworthily, EATS and DRINKS A SENTENCE AGAINST HIMSELF, NOT DISCERNING IT TO BE THE BODY OF THE LORD.
Ovcourse is symbolic.Jews were forbidden to drink blood plus this is cannibalism.Also in Hebrews It’s written that Jesus died and suffered on the cross only once.He is not suffering any more.When Jesus said that He is the gate or the way He did not mean literally .There is so many verses proving that this is not what He meant literally.His word is our spiritual food. I could go on and on.
1 Corinthians 11:23 For I have received from the Lord what I have also delivered to you: that the Lord Jesus, on the same night that he was handed over, took bread, 11:24 and giving thanks, he broke it, and said: “Take and eat. This is my body, which SHALL BE GIVEN UP FOR YOU. Do this in remembrance of me.” 11:25 Similarly also, the cup, after he had eaten supper, saying: “This cup is the new covenant in my blood. Do this, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of me.” 11:26 For whenever you eat this bread and drink this cup, you proclaim the death of the Lord, UNTIL HE RETURNS. 11:27 And so, whoever eats this bread, or drinks from the cup of the Lord, UNWORTHILY, SHALL BE LIABLE FOR THE BODY AND BLOOD OF THE LORD. 11:28 But let a man examine himself, and, in this way, let him eat from that bread, and drink from that cup. 11:29 For whoever eats and drinks unworthily, EATS and DRINKS A SENTENCE AGAINST HIMSELF, NOT DISCERNING IT TO BE THE BODY OF THE LORD. John 6:51 I am the living bread, who descended from heaven. 6:52 If anyone eats from this bread, he shall live in eternity. And the bread that I will give is my FLESH, for the life of the world.” 6:53 Therefore, the Jews debated among themselves, saying, “How can this man give us his flesh to eat?” 6:54 And so, Jesus said to them: “Amen, amen, I say to you, UNLESS YOU EAT THE FLESH OF THE SON OF MAN AND DRINK HIS BLOOD, YOU WILL NOT HAVE LIFE IN YOU. 6:55 Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up on the last day. 6:56 For my flesh is true food, and my blood is true drink. 6:57 Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood abides in me, and I in him. 6:58 Just as the living Father has sent me and I live because of the Father, so also whoever eats me, the same shall live because of me. 6:59 This is the bread that descends from heaven. It is not like the manna that your fathers ate, for they died. Whoever eats this bread shall live forever.” People left Jesus as they knew He was not speaking metaphorically. He doubled down several times that He meant literally to eat and drink of Him for eternal life. We wouldn’t be held liable for eating and drinking of Him unworthily, if it was metaphorically. The Transubstantiation occurs when the Priest blesses the bread and wine, transforming them into The Body and Blood of Jesus Christ, our God and Savior. Cannibalism is the eating of a bloody dead body, Jesus Christ is not dead and offers Himself to us in a non bloody way, even though He suffered a bloody Passion.
The consecration doesn't happen at prodestant churches. They aren't consecrated hands like Jesus made priest to be able to do thru him. They just see it as a symbol not really Jesus body and blood
Excited, whew i get it but slooooowwwwww down a bit. Machine gun, rapid fire talk is slurred together to a point of ,,,,what was that??? Back off the throttle a bit Chris. You have time. Father Riley: excellent!
God acts through His Priests, who He gave His authority, power and Sacraments(The Keys to the Kingdom of Heaven) to. God uses His power to give Himself to us as He did at The Last Supper with His apostles. 1 Cor 11:23-29, Jn 6:51-59, Mk 3:14-19, Mt 10:1-4, 16:18-19, 2 Cor 5:20.
@@southernlady1109 Is your God so impotent that he needs man to act for Him. Think about what you are saying and understand the Bible. How about talking to me about the brothers and sisters of Jesus
@@southernlady1109 John 2:12 After this, Jesus went down to Capernaum-he, his mother, his brothers, and his disciples-and they remained there for a few days. Mark 6:3 This is the builder, the son of Mary, and the brother of James, Joseph, Judas, and Simon, isn’t it? His sisters are here with us, aren’t they?” And they were offended by him. Mat 13:55-56 This is the builder’s son, isn’t it? His mother is named Mary, isn’t she? His brothers are James, Joseph, Simon, and Judas, aren’t they? 56 And his sisters are all with us, aren’t they? These are from my Confraternity Bible I was forced to buy in 1966 when I went to my Roman catholic High School but was told never to read. Either someone lied to you or our old Roman catholic Bible lies. Please don't respond with the drivel about cousins, that goes directly back to someone or thing is lying. I never slander my God but you seem to think sacrificing Jesus 240,000 times a day is good when He died once for all of us.
First, we must understand that the term brother has a wide semantic range in Scripture. It can mean a uterine brother, an extended relative, or even a spiritual brother. In Genesis 13:8 and 14:12, we read of one example of brother being used to describe an extended relationship: Abraham and Lot. Though they were actually uncle and nephew, they called one another “brother.” Moreover, in the New Testament, Jesus told us to call one another “brothers” in Matthew 23:8. The passage obviously does not mean to suggest that all Christians have the same physical mother. Notice, the “James” of whom Paul was speaking was both a “brother of the Lord” and an “apostle.” There are two apostles named James among the 12. The first James is revealed to be a “son of Zebedee.” He most likely would not be the “James” referred to because according to Acts 12:1-2 he was martyred very early on. Even if it was him, his father was named Zebedee, not Joseph. Paul more likely is referring to the second James who was an apostle, according to Luke 6:15-16. This James is revealed to have a father named Alphaeus, not Joseph. Thus, James the apostle and Jesus were not uterine brothers. Easy enough. Some will argue, however, that this “James” was not an apostle or that he was not one of the original 12. Though this is a possibility-others in the New Testament, such as Barnabas in Acts 14, are referred to as “apostles” in a looser sense-the argument from Scripture is weak. When Paul wrote about going “up to Jerusalem” to see Peter, he was writing about an event that occurred many years earlier, shortly after he had converted. He was basically going up to the apostles to receive approval lest he “should be running or had run in vain.” It would be more likely he would have here been speaking about “apostles” (proper), or “the twelve.” But for those inclined to argue the point, the Catechism of the Catholic Church uses another line of reasoning: The Church has always understood these passages as not referring to other children of the Virgin Mary. In fact James and Joseph, “brothers of Jesus,” are the sons of another Mary, a disciple of Christ, whom St. Matthew significantly calls “the other Mary.” They are close relations of Jesus, according to an Old Testament expression. (CCC 500) The Catechism here refers to the fact that 14 chapters after we find the “brothers” of the Lord listed as “James, Joseph, Simon and Judas,” we find “James and Joseph” mentioned again, but this time their mother is revealed as being named Mary, but not Mary, the Mother of Jesus. We can conclude that “James and Joseph” are “brothers” of Jesus, but they are not uterine brothers. But what about Matthew 1:24-25, and the claim Jesus was Mary’s “firstborn son” and that Joseph “knew her not until” Christ was born? Does Matthew here teach that Mary had other children? Exodus 13:1-2 reveals something very important about the firstborn in Israel: “The Lord said to Moses, ‘Consecrate to me all the firstborn; whatever is the first to open the womb among the people of Israel, both of man and beast, is mine.’” The “firstborn” were not given the title because there was a “second-born.” They were called “firstborn” at birth. Jesus being “firstborn” does not require that more siblings be born after him. Until Then Scripture’s statement that Joseph “knew [Mary] not until she brought forth her firstborn” would not necessarily mean they did “know” each other after she brought forth Jesus. Until is often used in Scripture as part of an idiomatic expression similar to our own usage in English. I may say to you, “Until we meet again, God bless you.” Does that necessarily mean after we meet again, God curse you? By no means. A phrase like this is used to emphasize what is being described before the until is fulfilled. It is not intended to say anything about the future beyond that point. Here are some biblical examples: 2 Samuel 6:23: And Michal the daughter of Saul had no child to (until) the day of her death. (Does this mean she had children after she died?) 1 Timothy 4:13: Until I come, attend to the public reading of scripture, to preaching, to teaching. (Does this mean Timothy should stop teaching after Paul comes?) 1 Corinthians 15:25: For he (Christ) must reign until he has put all his enemies under his feet. (Does this mean Christ’s reign will end? By no means! Luke 1:33 says, “he will reign over the house of Jacob forever and of his kingdom there shall be no end.”) In recent years, some have argued that because Matthew 1:25 uses the Greek words heos hou for “until” whereas the texts I mentioned above from the New Testament use heos alone, there is a difference in meaning. The argument goes that Heos hou indicates the action of the first clause does not continue. Thus, Mary and Joseph “not having come together” would have ended after Jesus was born. The problems with this theory begin with the fact that no available scholarship concurs with it. In fact, the evidence proves the contrary. Heos hou and heos are used interchangeably and have the same meaning. Acts 25:21 should suffice to clear up the matter: “But when Paul had appealed to be kept in custody for the decision of the emperor, I commanded him to be held until (Gk. heos hou) I could send him to Caesar.” Does this text mean that Paul would not be held in custody after he was “sent” to Caesar? Not according to the biblical record. He would be held in custody while in transit (see Acts 27:1) and after he arrived in Rome for a time (see Acts 29:16). The action of the main clause did not cease with heos hou. The Affirmative Argument Now let’s look at some reasons to believe in Mary’s perpetual virginity. Among the many we could examine, we will briefly consider three: 1. In Luke 1:34, when Mary was told by the angel Gabriel that she was chosen to be the Mother of the Messiah, she asked the question, literally translated from the Greek, “How shall this be since I know not man?” This question makes no sense unless Mary had a vow of virginity. When we consider that Mary and Joseph were already “espoused,” according to verse 27 of this same chapter, we understand Mary and Joseph already have what would be akin to a ratified marriage in the New Covenant. They were married. That would mean Joseph would have had the right to the marriage bed. Normally, after the espousal the husband would go off and prepare a home for his new bride and then come and receive her into his home where the union would be consummated. This is precisely why Joseph intended to “divorce her quietly” (Mt 1:19) when he later discovered she was pregnant. This background is significant because a newly married woman would not ask the question “How shall this be?” She would know-unless, of course, that woman had taken a vow of virginity. Mary believed the message, but wanted to know how this was going to be accomplished. This indicates she was not planning on the normal course of events for her future with Joseph. 2. In John 19:26, Jesus gave his Mother to the care of John even though by law the next eldest sibling would have the responsibility to care for her. It is unthinkable that Jesus would take his Mother away from his family in disobedience to the law. Some claim Jesus did this because his brothers and sisters were not there. They had left him. Thus, Jesus committed his Mother to John, who was faithful and present at the foot of the cross. This claim betrays a very low and unbiblical Christology. As John tells us, Jesus “knew all men” (cf. Jn 2:25). If James were his uterine brother, Jesus would have known he would be faithful along with his “brother” Jude. The fact is Jesus had no brothers and sisters, so he had the responsibility, on a human level, to take care of his Mother. 3. Mary is depicted as the spouse of the Holy Spirit in Scripture. In Luke 1:34, when Mary asks the angel how she will conceive a child, the angel responds: “The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you; therefore the child to be born will be called holy, the Son of God.” This is nuptial language hearkening back to Ruth 3:8, where Ruth said to Boaz “spread your skirt over me” when she revealed to him his duty to marry her according to the law of Deuteronomy 25. When Mary became pregnant, Joseph would have been required to divorce her because she would then belong to another (see Dt 24:1-4; Jer 3:1). But when Joseph found out that “the other” was the Holy Spirit, the idea of his having conjugal relations with Mary was not a consideration. Mary’s Protector An obvious question remains: Why did St. Joseph then “take [Mary] his wife” according to Matthew 1:24 if she belonged to the Holy Spirit? The Holy Spirit is Mary’s spouse, but Joseph was her spouse and protector on this earth for at least two obvious reasons. First, as Matthew points out in his genealogy in chapter 1, Joseph was in line to be a successor of David as King of Israel. Thus, if Jesus was to be the true “son of David” and king of Israel (see 2 Sm 7:14, Heb 1:5, Rv 19:16, 22:16), he needed to be the son of Joseph. As the only son of Joseph, even though adopted, he would have been in line for the throne. Also, in a culture that did not take too kindly to espoused women getting pregnant by someone other than their spouse, Mary would have been in mortal danger. So Joseph became Mary’s earthly spouse and protector as well as the protector of the child Jesus.
You should be. Is that why you're here? Because we are just so normal man? There may be Catholics who do evil just like there are protestants do things their church says are wrong. There are Catholics who are faithful to what the Church teaches and Catholics who choose to sin. As Jesus said, there are both wheat and tares in the Church. We don't judge anyone to be guilty by association. We don't judge the truth of the Church by the people who don't follow what the Church teaches. We don't judge Jesus as a traitor because of what Judas did. We don't say all teachers are bad because of the few bad teachers who have molested their students. I'm not making excuses, I'm explaining what the Church teaches. All Catholics who are faithful to Church teaching are growing in love.
I had to pause after the first minute. The Mass is NOT a reenactment of the Last Supper. At Mass we are re-present at the foot of the Cross as Our Lord sacrifices Himself for our salvation. OK. Back to the video.
Christ is not sacrificed again, the Church teaches that there is only one sacrifice and Jesus is already in heaven. In the Mass, the sacrifice of the Cross is made present and we participate in this eternal event..
As a Protestant who is trying to understand Catholic faith, why wouldn’t you just take Jesus words in John 6 as simply an understanding of His overarching atoning work ….. having a deep understanding of the meaning of His life and sacrificial death… that’s what Jesus meant ….. at least that’s what a Protestant would say
Protestants, for some reason, have to deny the real presence in the Eucharist. Perhaps it is because they know that no Protestant minister or pastor can change bread and wine into the body and blood of Jesus.
John 6:51 I am the living bread, who descended from heaven. 6:52 If anyone eats from this bread, he shall live in eternity. And the bread that I will give is my FLESH, for the life of the world.” 6:53 Therefore, the Jews debated among themselves, saying, “How can this man give us his flesh to eat?” 6:54 And so, Jesus said to them: “Amen, amen, I say to you, UNLESS YOU EAT THE FLESH OF THE SON OF MAN AND DRINK HIS BLOOD, YOU WILL NOT HAVE LIFE IN YOU. 6:55 Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up on the last day. 6:56 For my flesh is true food, and my blood is true drink. 6:57 Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood abides in me, and I in him. 6:58 Just as the living Father has sent me and I live because of the Father, so also whoever eats me, the same shall live because of me. 6:59 This is the bread that descends from heaven. It is not like the manna that your fathers ate, for they died. Whoever eats this bread shall live forever.” People left Jesus as they knew He was not speaking metaphorically. He doubled down several times that He meant literally to eat and drink of Him for eternal life. The Transubstantiation occurs when the Priest blesses the bread and wine, transforming them into The Body and Blood of Jesus Christ, our God and Savior. 1 Corinthians 11:23 For I have received from the Lord what I have also delivered to you: that the Lord Jesus, on the same night that he was handed over, took bread, 11:24 and giving thanks, he broke it, and said: “Take and eat. This is my body, which SHALL BE GIVEN UP FOR YOU. Do this in remembrance of me.” 11:25 Similarly also, the cup, after he had eaten supper, saying: “This cup is the new covenant in my blood. Do this, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of me.” 11:26 For whenever you eat this bread and drink this cup, you proclaim the death of the Lord, UNTIL HE RETURNS. 11:27 And so, whoever eats this bread, or drinks from the cup of the Lord, UNWORTHILY, SHALL BE LIABLE FOR THE BODY AND BLOOD OF THE LORD. 11:28 But let a man examine himself, and, in this way, let him eat from that bread, and drink from that cup. 11:29 For whoever eats and drinks unworthily, EATS and DRINKS A SENTENCE AGAINST HIMSELF, NOT DISCERNING IT TO BE THE BODY OF THE LORD.
Father, why don't you try saying the Mass 'ad orienem' and then the theatrics and distractions disappear. The congregation will have a greater devotion to the Eucharist if they don't see your face but only His face in the elevated host.
Nope. That is exactly what happens at the Catholic Mass. We are taken back in time to the foot of the cross, literally. We are present at the crucifixion that to God--who exists outside of time--can still see His Son being crucified on the cross. It is a re-presentation of the crucifixion. Jesus is present on the altar in the species of bread and wine. He is there, body, blood, soul, and divinity, being offered up to His Father. EXACTLY how Jesus did it at the Last Supper, which was the very first Mass.
Where do you get that idea from? Who taught you that? I think you may want to read some of the early church fathers to see what many have to say about the Eucharist, one of that heard the apostle John was Polycarp of Smyrna. He wrote 6 letters before he was martyred. I would recommend researching Martin Luther and Calvin and read their actual words and writing before they went in a different direction, or better yet listen to the series from Augustine Institute. It will show you that the faithful in the Church (only one Universal) all had faith in the Eucharist that Jesus talked about in John 6. Why do you think it was a hard teaching and so many left? It take faith and trust to believe in the words of Jesus. Just as it takes that same faith through the Holy Spirit to believe that he died and was resurrected. Is that hocus-pocus, some would say so and have. What was the Church for 1,500 before the Reformation? To know truth you have to search and pray with a sincere heart.
@@cindychronis7857 have you ever read a church approved book called "faith of millions"? In the book John O'Brien matter of factly describes what takes place in the eucharist. First and foremost The most important ? For you is where does scripture say ONLY the priest has the power to reach up into heaven and bring Christ down onto the altar? Besides if it is really the body of Christ how is it these wafers are made by nuns in some factory? So what happens to the leftover "body of Christ"? Does it return to it's wafer state. The wafer state that never really changed but you are told you must believe or you are damned? If you are to really drink his blood why doesn't your allow you to partake if the blood? You see the Hocus pocus in all this? That is not how scripture says the Last supper took place. O'Brien goes on to say that he has more power than the "blessed virgin Mary". I guess that's amounts to zero because Mary was not given any special powers, names by Jesus. In fact the in Luke you will find that she is called the "handmaid of the Lord". Or you can correct me if I'm wrong. So where did I get that from? From a church approved book that is nothing but church propaganda.
"Hocus pocus" ... well, I suppose you can have that interpretation if you choose. But it's interesting to me that protestants who are so laser focused on the Bible (alone) seem to feel comfortable ignoring the vary plain words (and context) of what Christ said in John 6, and in the institution narratives in the synoptic gospels. I pray that your hardened heart might one day come to see the tremendous gift Christ gave us ... food for the journey, the perfected manna. Pax Christi.
@@kdmdlo no we don't ignore the words of Christ. Christ did not literally mean to eat his body and drink his blood. Let me ask you, did Jesus turn into s door? Did Nicodemus go back into his mother's womb? When Jesus said we are the salt, did we turn into salt. So your church just arbitrarily picked John 6 to deceive many. Mostly by claiming that the priest has power to bring Christ onto the altar. Christ actually explains what he meant later in v 63. It's just that your church ignores the latter part of John 6. Jesus says that it is the Spirit that quickeneth, the flesh profits nothing. He said the words that he spoke are Spirit and THEY are life. What does your so called first pope say? He echoes Christ's words in his epistles when he said that Christ died ONCE, the just for the unjust and was quickened by the spirit. I encourage you to read Hebrews 7, 9, and 10. There you will find that Jesus made ONE sacrifice, ONCE for all time. You Catholics seem to have trouble with the words once or one. Such as one God, one mediator. And if you notice those Hebrew scriptures I mentioned repeatedly use the words one and once for a reason. i wonder why Jesus proclaimed "it is finished" as he died? Yet your church continues to crucify Christ over and over and over. It's like Hebrews say the priest continues to make the same sacrifice that can not take away any sins. You know why? Because the one time death if Christ on the cross was sufficient. I wonder why Christ said "it is finished? One quick side question why is the next coming if Christ called the "second coming"? Why does scripture say that when he comes it will be with power and glory and that EVERY eye will see him. Yet you Catholics see him everyday? I guess the biggest catholic problem with the eucharist is where does scripture say that only a priest can do the mass? Where does scripture say that the priest has the power to bring Christ down onto the altar? Interesting that John O'Brien wrote a book, I am sure you are aware of it because it is approved reading by your church. It's "faith of millions". In that book he says a priest has more power than seraphim and cherubim. Now get this, he says that the priest has even more power than the "blessed virgin Mary". Pretty amazing when we all know Mary was given no special powers. At least not anything verifiable by scripture. But according to the church, Mary has the same powers as God. So a priest is more powerful than God? I can't find any of this in scripture anywhere. Can you help me out. Besides you Catholics all say that you must eat his body and drink his blood. Truth is your hocus pocus church doesn't allow you to drink the so called blood, does it? So you and your church violates the very scripture you claim to abide by and that protestants ignore. So where does scripture say NOT to drink the blood because your priest is afraid you'll spill it? Finally, if the wafer is really the body of Christ, why are the wafers made in some factory by nuns? Another point. What happens to the remaining parts of the body? Does the priest return Jesus back to heaven? So you see your church's undignified manner in which it performs this mass is nothing like described in scripture and raises many questions you have no answers for.
“Picture then the high priest Christ leaving the sacristy of heaven for the altar of Calvary. He has already put on the vestment of our human nature, the maniple of our suffering, the stole of the priesthood, the chasuble of the Cross. Calvary is his cathedral; the rock of Calvary is the altar stone; the sun turning to red is the sanctuary lamp; Mary and John are the living side altars; the Host is His Body; the wine is His Blood. He is upright as Priest, yet He is prostrate as Victim. His Mass is about to begin.” (From Calvary and the Mass, Fulton Sheen)
🔔 Subscribe for more about understanding, living, and sharing the Catholic Faith! ua-cam.com/users/AugustineInstitute
Huh. This priest is giving false theology from Vatican II, and you should know better. He just said that there was only one Mass, mystically present through all time, and he equated that Mass with the Last Supper. That is heresy. The Mass is the sacrifice of Calvary. We are not all mystically present at the Last Supper. We are all mystically present at the foot of the Cross.
Dude, how did you not catch that?
I have joined the Priesthood and will be ordained in 2 years. Very happy for the Holy Eucharist 🥰
Just think. You’ll be able to call Jesus down anytime you want
@@lukegroves5506 Thanks. He will come to anyone who calls on his name. He loves all equally without bias 🥰
@@projecteucharist You are a deacon yet? I'm a celibate hermit who writes at home and takes care of my infirm parents.
God bless your studies.
@@pauljordan4452 I will receive my Diaconate in my last year. Thanks so much. God bless you too.
Glory unto GOD, may remain in GOD in good and bad times,
Attending a Catholic Mass is like being invited to The Last Supper with God and His apostles. Receiving Him in Holy Communion is the most beautiful, powerful and intimate union we can have with Him while on earth. Beautiful Faith!!!
It truly is heaven on earth.
Blessed are those called to the Supper of the Lamb!
Father's tip - do the readings before the Mass - I used to think that was unnecessary. But recently, one morning I did this. Father is right! My anticipation of the readings drew me in as I heard them in Mass and impacted me greatly. I am making this a new habit. Thanks for this presentation!
I have my own Roman Missals that I bring to Sunday and Daily Mass. It helps to have the readings in advance, and to read the Churchs' teaching before Mass.
Dr. Brant Petri gives a deep explanation of the weekly readings. Using typology he explains how the Old Testament covenants are finalized in the everlasting Covenant in Jesus's Blood. He puts it all together beautifully. The full videos can be found on Catholic Productions and partial videos on UA-cam.
I left the Catholic Church in 1979. I studied and went to Bible college and seminary and pastored Assemblies of God Churches for 39 years. But....at retirement I felt empty. Why? I missed the reverence of the RCC. I began to study those Scriptures again that spoke of the Eucharist, in addition, I began an intense study of early Church history. The result? I must "confess" That the Catholic Church is in fact the true Church. By no means am I saying that if you are not Catholic you are damned to hell. What I am saying is if you sincerely want to be as close as possible to how the early church worshipped you should strongly consider the Catholic church. If you do nothing else, study the Bible and church history for yourself and then make your decision. I also urge you to sincerely pray.
I don’t think there is such a thing as hell.
@@Multijoe84yor thinking doesn't change reality.
Thanks John for being so honest. I also think with the Catholic Church that there is a treasure trove of writers, saints, theology. And let's face it, most visions are experienced by Catholic children, with shrines around the world (eg. Our Lady of Champion, Fatima, Lourdes, Medjugorje)visited by millions. I think that says it all.
@@fernandosaez819 it changes John's personal reality. What is reality, anyway? What reality are you referring to?
Orthodox hasn't changed much since Christ. Just saying.
Im in tears. Ive been Catholic since birth, but i never realized the mass was bringing us to the cross. Im absolutely mindblown. Thank you, thank you, thank you!!!❤
I love you Jesus.
Thank you, this is wonderful, as a returning catholic this is so helpful and affirming.
Absolutely the best way to explain mass and what happens there. I especially liked the priest's comment about God brushing away time and space. I have always felt that we are truly present at the Cross because His sacrifice on the Cross broke through time and space so we could be there. And we are--at Mass. As far as being bored. When I was young I could get bored. As a child I was constantly asking my mother when it would be over. As a much older adult I am in awe of the Mass and what is happening there. I could never go to a protestant Sunday service and get anything out of it. They are just plain DULL! A few prayers, and few hymns and a long talk about a verse or two from the bible. The Bible is all. Occasionally they will have their idea of communion, usually a symbol only kind of thing. Not the real deal! Glad I am Catholic and have come to a more understanding of the Mass and what is going on there. The only true worship to God.
Fr Riley is a true treasure for the Church.
My old parish Priest Fr John Riley, Fine Priest and Excellent Confessor
preacher Father , what a beautiful way of explaining the word! Glory unto GOD, what a beautiful Catholic teaching.
😢
Lord Jesus, You are the center of our life; we do so adore You...we trust You, we try to never make a decision without Your guidance. Thank you for the many blessings & grace You have given to us. Your Mother's presence, too, is a gift beyond description. We are grateful, O Holy One, we pray we express our gratitude through our everyday life in our actions, mercy & love.
♡
Excellent summary, thank you. “Divine power casually brushes aside space and time”… The football game analogy too is a helpful one - No spectators!
Excellent video.
Praying for the Restoration of Traditional Latin Mass in the Roman Rite of the Catholic Church
Thing is, Jesus and Peter spoke in more languages than Latin. They spoke Greek, Hebrew and Latin. Maybe more. So, I'm not sure.
@@tatie7604
True, but I want The Latin Mass for more than the language, I like the priest facing the same way as the layman, like a general leading us into battle. And I prefer no jokes from the priest, I never get them at Latin Mass. All priests should limit their repertoire of jokes to only the ones St John told the Blessed Mother on the day her son hung from the cross
@tatie7604 Jesus and the Apostles spoke Aramaic. It was the vernacular in and around Jerusalem and Judea. In the Temple, they mostly spoke Hebrew. When they wrote, it was usually in Hebrew or Koine Greek.
Knowing Aramaic helps to better understand the New Testament, as does Koine Greek and Hebrew. It is very difficult to interpret the Bible accurately without knowing all three, as they were spoken in the first century.
This is surely the next schism in the Catholic Church. You're playing with fire.
i'm praying that we all will return with reverence and excited anticipation to the Eucharist, whatever valid form or language its celebrated in. Attachment to only one form is idolatry because we worship God present in sacrament, word and people not in thee form-which by the way the TLM-Tridentine is about 500 yearss old not ancient and not the language or form of the ancient Apostolic church.
The journey had been brighter every day
"The Mass is the sacrifice of Calvary perpetuated, re-presented, continued, on all the altars in the Mystical immolation of Jesus Christ." - St. Peter Julian Eymard, Apostle of the Eucharist
Thank you. Thank God there is another Catholic present in this room. This priest just falsely stated that the Mass is the Last Supper, mystically present throughout time. No, it's the sacrifice of Calvary, and we're all mystically present at the foot of the Cross, not at the Last Supper. The Mass is a sacrifice, not a supper.
The Mass transports to us across time the Last Supper, Calvary, and Easter morning, set in the backdrop of the Old and New Testaments. The Traditional Latin Rite unites all across the world and across time in form and substance.
May he make of us and eternal offering to you, or some of the most impactful words ever spoken.
Catholic church is the true church. Fullness of truth. Yes we do get a chance for eternal life
true
False. You're just as bad as the pagons.
@@treek10kI don't think you know what pagan means
Not with a works based salvation
Yes, Catholics are citizens amongst the Saints in Gods household. Eph 2:19-22 Jesus Christ taught we are to remain in His Doctrine that He set in His Church and receive His Sacraments or WE DO NOT HAVE GOD. 2 Jn 1:9, Gal1:6-9, Jn 3:5, 6:51-59, 1 Cor 11:23-29, Jn 20:21-23, 2 Cor 5:18-20 in His One True Apostolic Catholic Church-Jn 10:16, 17:20-26, Eph 4:4-6.
Salvation is by loving God enough to live His Commandments, Church, Sacraments, Doctrine, Teaching, doing His works, having faith, receiving His grace, love and Unfathomable Mercy!
Thanks really big there are à lot to learn everytime. Wow! Great God in the person of Fr. Riley.
God bless Fr. Riley
I noticed the priest at the consecration says it differently than a Protestant minister. I’m not an English major, so I looked up the tense used by the priest. It’s the Future-Progressive Tense i.e. “ In the future, I will be playing tennis.” “ This is my body which, WILL BE, given up for you”. This event is on going and it puts the priest hours before ( back to the last Supper) the real event, that has yet to happen. and will be happening in the future, every time a priest calls down Jesus… like when Jesus told the Apostles, what was going to happen to him very shortly. The sacrifice is always ON GOING. Protestant language always says “ is given “ the body of Jesus is given to you. Sorry, maybe I’m way out in Space on this!
Catholic priests say it the way it has been said for well over a thousand years.
Only ordained Catholic priests have the ability to confect the bread and wine into the body and blood of Jesus. Catholic priests, through Apostolic succession, can trace their ordination back through history to
one of the Apostles and to Jesus.
The Eucharist is only available through the Catholic Church.
Protestants don't celebrate Mass. It's roman Catholics who do
@@jeffscully50613 Small correction. The Orthodox Church has a valid Eucharist as well.The Consecration of the Eucharist during the divine liturgy of both the Eastern Catholic churches and the Eastern Orthodox churches is valid.
@@raymondvasquez6967 It's all Catholic. There are 23 different Catholic rites. The Orthodox churches all come from Jesus' one, holy, catholic, and Apostolic Church. They have valid ordination of bishops, who can trace their ordination back to the Apostles.
@@jeffscully50613 No, it is not. Eastern-rite Catholics are part of the Catholic Church, despite differences in custom and liturgical practice from Western Catholics. While Eastern Orthodox Christians have much in common with Catholics, they’re still in schism-they’ve split off from the legitimate authority of the pope-and therefore aren’t Catholics.
Can Roman Catholics receive communion at an Orthodox church?
Yes, but like anyone else, they must first go through the process of joining the Orthodox Church, which involves setting aside former church memberships. Non-Orthodox Christians of any sort may not receive communion at an Orthodox church without doing this. There are no “walk-ins” for communion.
At the same time, Orthodox Christians are also not permitted to commune anywhere but in an Orthodox church, and they also have to be prepared by prayer, fasting and a recent confession
If you also note, while the Orthodox Church has remained stagnant in terms of growth, the Catholic Church is growing - while becoming less European and American, it is growing in continents such as Africa and Asia, a testament to the Holy Spirit working in His Church.
Wooow... So ably explained Fr. I am at a so receivership seat at your audience... Nicely done one more time
Very good. I believe but for many reasons a difficult thing to believe. Your UA-cam video is excellent.
The Homily can be very powerful if you have the right priest.
Asking our Guardian Angels to help works wonders in helping to maintain focus on God, not ourselves
Beautiful.
Learn The Mass ✅
Love The Mass✅
Live The Mass ✅
In John 6 he's saying to ear his flesh and drink his blood which is the bread and wine turned into his body and blood
Amen
This priest is very impressive. And I very much like that he is not trying to be cool or popular.
In heaven we get the beatific vision of God the Father. That is a never ending joy beyond any expectation. In heaven we get to be with Jesus Christ in a most intimate way of holy communion. This union is beyond the great love we experience in marriage and children. Yet it is a similar type of bond that the bride church gets to live in paradise. In heaven we get to be filled with the Holy Spirit who will enhance our animation with love as pure as the angels. In heaven we will be full of Grace along with The Blessed Mother.
When Jesus proclaimed the Good News he was truly proclaiming the Kingdom we are called to. Carry your cross with heaven in mind and let’s try to spread the Good News!
If its not the body of Christ that we receive when we gather, what is the point of doing it?
Reading scripture in context is so important! Chapter 6 :63 of the book of John tells us: Jesus is-speaking spiritually about the bread we celebrate in remembrance of Him-and then when you connect the passage of John 14:26 Jesus promises us the Holy Spirit when he left this earth! Furthermore,Jesus completed the 1 sacrifice: verse 12 of chapter 10 Hebrews states: “ but when this priest/Jesus had offered for all time one sacrifice for sins, he said down at the right hand of God!” He said on the cross: “It is finished”! John 19:30
No more representations or sacrifices are needed; He leaves us the Holy Spirit! We are awaiting the 2nd coming! He is with the Father in Heaven until He comes in Glory! Hebrews 1:3 …. “And He had provided purification for sins, He sat down at the right hand of the Majesty on high.” Only through reading the word can we have clarity. 🙏🏻💫📖
Your interpretation does not negate Gods Truth. You can’t pick one verse to support your claim. Jesus Christ told His apostles at The Last Supper to continue His offerings until He returns. Jesus was not talking about His Flesh in Jn 6:64.
John 6:63 Then what if you were to see the Son of man ascending to where he was before?
John 6:64 It is the Spirit who gives life. The flesh does not offer anything of benefit. The words that I have spoken to you are spirit and life.
John 6:51 I am the living bread, who descended from heaven.
6:52 If anyone eats from this bread, he shall live in eternity. And the bread that I will give is my FLESH, for the life of the world.”
6:53 Therefore, the Jews debated among themselves, saying, “How can this man give us his flesh to eat?”
6:54 And so, Jesus said to them: “Amen, amen, I say to you, UNLESS YOU EAT THE FLESH OF THE SON OF MAN AND DRINK HIS BLOOD, YOU WILL NOT HAVE LIFE IN YOU.
6:55 Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up on the last day.
6:56 For my flesh is true food, and my blood is true drink.
6:57 Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood abides in me, and I in him.
6:58 Just as the living Father has sent me and I live because of the Father, so also whoever eats me, the same shall live because of me.
6:59 This is the bread that descends from heaven. It is not like the manna that your fathers ate, for they died. Whoever eats this bread shall live forever.”
People left Jesus as they knew He was not speaking metaphorically. He doubled down several times that He meant literally to eat and drink of Him for eternal life. The Transubstantiation occurs when the Priest blesses the bread and wine, transforming them into The Body and Blood of Jesus Christ, our God and Savior.
1 Corinthians 11:23 For I have received from the Lord what I have also delivered to you: that the Lord Jesus, on the same night that he was handed over, took bread,
11:24 and giving thanks, he broke it, and said: “Take and eat. This is my body, which SHALL BE GIVEN UP FOR YOU. Do this in remembrance of me.”
11:25 Similarly also, the cup, after he had eaten supper, saying: “This cup is the new covenant in my blood. Do this, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of me.”
11:26 For whenever you eat this bread and drink this cup, you proclaim the death of the Lord, UNTIL HE RETURNS.
11:27 And so, whoever eats this bread, or drinks from the cup of the Lord, UNWORTHILY, SHALL BE LIABLE FOR THE BODY AND BLOOD OF THE LORD.
11:28 But let a man examine himself, and, in this way, let him eat from that bread, and drink from that cup.
11:29 For whoever eats and drinks unworthily, EATS and DRINKS A SENTENCE AGAINST HIMSELF, NOT DISCERNING IT TO BE THE BODY OF THE LORD.
Pls who is "saintly the great"
Some were with us but not of us
Prepare for the Mass also by considering those sins your going to ask forgiveness for at the Mass, because at that point in the Mass we only get a few seconds if that to reflect - and our venial sins are forgiven at each mass but how much more special is it that we know what those are as we are offering up the Mass.... and by considering for what or whom are you going to offer this particular Mass up for?
Notice past, present, and future in this verse along with a divine act transformed by divine words into a divine living present eternity that gets consumed in the body, and infused, or communed, into the spirit, so that unity is achieved between the church and the Lord. At the same time, a divine proclamation of the death and resurrection of Christ goes forth into all of God's creation.
1 Corinthians 11:26 NRSV-CI
[26] For as often as you eat this bread and drink the cup, you proclaim the Lord's death until he comes.
Transubstitiation happens during the offering of the Eucaristic Host and wine. Transforming these to becoming the body and blood of Jesus Christ. To receive these one must make peace with GOD a.k.a. confession. Ask a Priest, because communion is a serious and crucial time that Jesus Christ spends with His followers. He becomes one with them.
Luke’s gospel doesn’t say “…in memory of me”. It says “… in remembrance of me “.
A serious question from a serious believer. If John 6:52-53 are to be taken literally, does that mean that non-Catholics have no chance of eternal life?
the good thief was saved, salvation is offered to all who confess their sin and repent, believe in Christ, and Christ lives in those who not just profess but who also do the will of Christ. Yet many people reject Christ (sin) and reject Christ’s Church and the Sacraments which offer sanctification, growth in grace, holiness and virtue by receiving the Body/Blood/Soul and Divinity of Christ (life within you) in a state of grace, a pure gift but a gift which can be rejected as Judas did at the Last Supper.
Confession of sin, repentance, faith and love is the difference between a wedding day and marriage…daily pick up your cross…love sacrificially- this is the good news - to receive Christ in the Eucharist, to be present for the timeless Pasch and live out the Paschal mystery each day is LIFE to the FULL. A wedding is the beginning of a marriage but it is not living a married life
Rutherglen road, well the church already teaches that outside the church there is no salvation. Only problem is that teaching isn't found anywhere in scripture. The church makes many claims not based on scripture. Salvation is not through a church but by the blood of Jesus Christ.
389
I Am the Church. The Church was founded by Me and it can never die
Saturday, April 7th, 2012 @ 10:00
My dearly beloved daughter, the schism I spoke of has begun in the Catholic Church.
My Teachings, which have never changed since My Holy Scriptures ended with the Book of Revelation, are now being challenged.
There have been a number of challenges, opinions and theological assessments of My Holy Word throughout the centuries.
Many fine men questioned the instructions and the Teachings, which I imparted to mankind.
Some of My Teachings were taken apart, analysed, new interpretations sought and then accepted.
Yet this has been unnecessary, for the Truth was given to man by the prophets who came before Me and then by Me during My time on Earth.
The Truth has never changed. The Truth is simple.
Other information, not contained in Holy Scripture was given, as a Gift to the world, through chosen souls, for one reason only. To help you contemplate on My Sacrifice for mankind and to show and remind you of the Love I hold in My Heart for all of God’s children.
Any Divine Revelations given to the world today are to help you prepare for Eternal Life.
My Teachings, honoured by the Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church, are now being attacked in the first of many challenges, which will result in the division of the Church.
New laws will be introduced to suit modern opinion and so that they sit comfortably with those who, with pride in their souls, feel a need to pacify mankind, rather than show obedience to the Teachings of the Church.
I Am the Church. The Church was founded by Me and it can never die.
Many, including those from within, as well as from outside the Church, will attempt to break down its structure.
Pray that My Holy Vicar, Pope Benedict XVI, will remain strong amidst the opposition he now faces.
This is a deliberate attempt, by those connected with the false prophet, to create a new church.
These cunning people will have you believe it will be the same Church, but it cannot be.
How can My Church, with new laws, twisted versions of the Truth I gave to the world, represent Me?
It can’t. This is why My Father will direct His Church, the true, loyal believers, from the Heavens.
He will hold the keys, until the Second Coming, when the New Jerusalem will rise, the One True Catholic Church, out of the ashes to be reclaimed by all of God’s children, all religions, all creeds as one.
This is the way it was meant to be in full and final union in the New Era of Peace on Earth.
Your beloved Jesus Christ
@@rbnmnt3341 You have to answer the question, what is the Catholic (Universal) Church and who is a part of that. You also must realize that there was no Bible for the first 300 years. What or who did those Christians rely on for teaching? That is why the Church uses both Scripture and tradition. Scripture alone is nowhere in the Bible. The Catholic Church teaches that Salvation is through Christ. None of us can even come close to understanding the depth and width of God's mercy.
@@cindychronis7857 the catholic universal church is NOT synonymous with the universal church Christ established. The church likes to pedal that false propaganda because it's not supported by scripture. Jesus said "upon this rock I will build my church". Note, Jesus did not say "I will build my catholic church". Jesus mentions no religion or denomination . Your church has just inserted itself into scripture to pedal that lie. Scripture does not mention catholicism, much less the papacy. The church that Christ founded is the worldwide body of believers and not a physical church which Rome has established.
If you read in the gospel of Luke you will see that there was a strife amongst the apostles. What was this strife about? The apostles, peter included, were contending as to who should be the greatest among them. What??? The greatest? I thought peter was the pope? Why was he involved in the strife? Didn't the other apostles know that Peter was the pope? Of course not. Did Jesus stand up and defend his "pope" or the papacy? Jesus did no such thing.
Next point on this matter. Jesus had already declared who HE thought was the greatest. In the gospel of Matthew Jesus said this. "Verily I say unto you, of them born of women,there has not risen a greater than John the Baptist". So biblically speaking, who was the greatest? Jesus never said anything remotely close to that about peter. I wonder why John was the one chosen to prepare the way of the Lord?. It makes no sense for Jesus to appoint peter as the pope in Matthew 16 and a few verses later Jesus rebuked him. Rebuked by saying "get behind me Satan". The pope is nothing but a myth ok cal position appointed by Rome. Who the pope himself claims everyone shou lad be subject to and who says he is the vicar of Christ. You won't find that in scripture. When Jesus ascended he prayed to the Father who sent the Holy Spirit to be with us til the end of time. Please show me the scripture I missed that says the pope was left in charge of the church.
Let's not forget that peter rejected cornelius'gestures when he tried to homage to him. Peter helped coronavirus stand up and said stand up, I am a man just like you. Peter never referred to himself as a pope. Peter calls himself a servant, an apostle, a fellow elder and a man as he did to Cornelius. Peter was never called the pope by Jesus, the apostles or even Mary. I guess the most important question to you is this. Where does scripture say Jesus, the apostles or Mary were catholic? If you read closely everything scripture says points to them being Jewish. No record of any conversion, peter or anyone doing anything "catholic" in the bible. Peter never said a mass. Mary didn't baptize Jesus as an infant. Catholicism does not exist biblically.
🙏🙏🙏
At 7:30, this is what I personally believe, That the Sacrifice at the Cross is Timeless and not bound by a time constraint, applicable to all the Eucharistic sacrifices at the altar by this one and only self sufficient sacrifice.... In the last few days, i found myself deeply saddened because of the word Renactment and Representation regarding the Eucharist, i feel like the justification for the sameness between the sacrifice of the mass and of the cross on ground of same victim and same offerer a little ambiguous, rather i believe, it should have mentioned clearly that the sacrifice at the cross and at the altar are the same, since it is the same sacrifice 2000 years ago that is brought at the altar or we being brought to the Calvary. Is there anyone who can help me, I'm in a crisis of faith not regarding the real presence but regarding what is really present
i.e Which Sacrifice?
Which Christ, the Christ of the cross or the Christ of the Resurrection?
If it is the Christ of the Resurrection, woukd it mean that it is a new sacrifice?
Jesus Christ told His apostles at The Last Supper to continue His offerings until He returns.
John 6:51 I am the living bread, who descended from heaven.
6:52 If anyone eats from this bread, he shall live in eternity. And the bread that I will give is my FLESH, for the life of the world.”
6:53 Therefore, the Jews debated among themselves, saying, “How can this man give us his flesh to eat?”
6:54 And so, Jesus said to them: “Amen, amen, I say to you, UNLESS YOU EAT THE FLESH OF THE SON OF MAN AND DRINK HIS BLOOD, YOU WILL NOT HAVE LIFE IN YOU.
6:55 Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up on the last day.
6:56 For my flesh is true food, and my blood is true drink.
6:57 Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood abides in me, and I in him.
6:58 Just as the living Father has sent me and I live because of the Father, so also whoever eats me, the same shall live because of me.
6:59 This is the bread that descends from heaven. It is not like the manna that your fathers ate, for they died. Whoever eats this bread shall live forever.”
People left Jesus as they knew He was not speaking metaphorically. He doubled down several times that He meant literally to eat and drink of Him for eternal life. The Transubstantiation occurs when the Priest blesses the bread and wine, transforming them into The Body and Blood of Jesus Christ, our God and Savior.
1 Corinthians 11:23 For I have received from the Lord what I have also delivered to you: that the Lord Jesus, on the same night that he was handed over, took bread,
11:24 and giving thanks, he broke it, and said: “Take and eat. This is my body, which SHALL BE GIVEN UP FOR YOU. Do this in remembrance of me.”
11:25 Similarly also, the cup, after he had eaten supper, saying: “This cup is the new covenant in my blood. Do this, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of me.”
11:26 For whenever you eat this bread and drink this cup, you proclaim the death of the Lord, UNTIL HE RETURNS.
11:27 And so, whoever eats this bread, or drinks from the cup of the Lord, UNWORTHILY, SHALL BE LIABLE FOR THE BODY AND BLOOD OF THE LORD.
11:28 But let a man examine himself, and, in this way, let him eat from that bread, and drink from that cup.
11:29 For whoever eats and drinks unworthily, EATS and DRINKS A SENTENCE AGAINST HIMSELF, NOT DISCERNING IT TO BE THE BODY OF THE LORD.
Fr. Ripperger is a great source.
According to St Thomas Aquinas, the word mass comes from the Latin words, Ite missa est!, meaning It has been sent!(Sacrifice has been sent to God)
The Mass is calvary re presented. We should kneel during the consecration, as all of heaven descends to earth at the altar in adoration of Christ
Then why don't they also serve the wine at communion like the Orthodox do?
It isn't wine. It is the very blood of Jesus.
What Catholic churchhave you gone to? All Catholic churches offer both body and blood-except the so-called "traditional latin Mass".Christ is present in both species but for the record we do take both.
@@RedRiverMan Not during COVID restrictions because only the celebrant drinks from the chalice.
The Bible is the inspired word of God.
1 Timothy 2:5 “For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus;”
Luke 1:46-47 And Mary said, My soul doth magnify the Lord, 47 And my spirit hath rejoiced in God my Savior
Romans 3:10 As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one:
1 Corinthians 10:4 “And did all drink the same spiritual drink: for they drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them: and that Rock was Christ.”
1 Samuel 2:2 “There is none holy as the LORD: for there is none beside thee: neither is there any rock like our God.
Mark 7:7. “Howbeit in vain do they worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men.”
2 Timothy 2:15 “Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.”
John 14:6 “Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.”
1 Timothy 4:3 “Forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain from meats, which God hath created to be received with thanksgiving of them which believe and know the truth.”
2 Timothy 3:15 “And that from a child thou hast known the holy scriptures, which are able to make thee wise unto salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus.”
Matthew 4:4 But he answered and said, It is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God.
Better to be a born again Christian.
Congratulations on being born again
Catholics are born again the biblical way from water and spirit. Just like the Bible says. Yet some of you claim water baptism is not necessary.
You have let your self be deceived by new doctrines
Romans 16
" I urge you, brothers and sisters, to watch out for those who cause divisions and put obstacles in your way that are contrary to the teaching you have learned. Keep away from them. 18 For such people are not serving our Lord Christ, but their own appetites. By smooth talk and flattery they deceive the minds of naive people. 19 Everyone has heard about your obedience, so I rejoice because of you; but I want you to be wise about what is good, and innocent about what is evil.
2 Corinthians
3 But I am afraid that as the serpent deceived Eve by its cunning, your thoughts will be led astray from a sincere and purelal devotion to Christ. 4 For if someone comes and proclaims another Jesus than the one we proclaimed, or if you receive a different spirit from the one you received, or a different gospel from the one you accepted, you submit to it readily enough. 5 I think that I am not in the least inferior to these super-apostles. 6| may be untrained in speech, but not in knowledge; certainly in every way and in all things we have made this evident to you
2 Thessalonians
Therefore, brethren, stand fast and hold to the traditions which ye have been taught, whether by word or our epistle.
You have let yourself be deceived. Your teachings are so new, they do not hold to apostolic, early church teachings.
You teach against the word of God ; baptism is important yet some of your type claims it’s not needed for salvation
You claim the Eucharist is just a symbol,
You are the one that holds on to the tradition of men; they taught you sola scriptura and sola fide.
Those two man made traditions hold no historic value before the reformation.
Before we had a Bible we had prayers to Mary( not praying to Mary)
Fun fact in the early church there was a small sect called the
Kollyridians or Collyridians fourth-century Arabian cult of Mary that worshiped Mary, as Epiphanius mentioned in his writing against heretics (see: Haer. 78, 23; 79). He coined the expression Collyridians which has the meaning of "cake-eater-sect." Leontius of Byzance had a different name for them. He called them "Philomarianites," meaning Mary-lovers (PG 87, 1364). The priestesses of this sect used to present Our Lady with cakes or a special kind of bread (kolluris).
Epiphanius warned them: "Although Mary is the most beautiful and holy and worthy of praise, we don't owe her adoration." (Haer. 79, 7, PG 42, 752) In a different passage Epiphanius uses even stronger words: "Adoration must cease. For Mary is no goddess nor has she received her body from heaven. (oute gar theos hae Maria oute ap'ouranou exousa to soma)" (Haer. 78, 24). Collyridians are also known and mentioned by John Damascene (PG 94, 728
One mediator. What does the word mean. You take everything out of context- do you not believe the Bible is one. Inspiration by the Holy Spirit? Yet you guys jump from one sentence to another. The one mediator is referring to the one that gave his life for us , offered himself as a sacrifice.
But if you read the Bible verse before that it says to pray for everyone, making us mediators between god and the person that asks for prayer. Moises was chosen by Isreal to be a mediator. Jesus chose the disciples. The Holy Spirit chose you to mediate the love of Jesus to your family.
Read church history and find out how you have been deceived.
Word of god is real rosary is real trust the process
Mass is everything except boring. It is a privilege to sinner to be there, a forgiven sinner to partake.
Fabulous to hear this.
1 Corinthians 10: 15-17
When Chris suggests that the pulpit is not the “center of the Catholic worship”, Father Riley replies, “right” which implies that the reading of the “Word of God” is of minor importance. But isn’t the Word of God, in the liturgy of the Word, of quintessential importance, as is the Eucharist, in the liturgy of the Eucharist?
That's not what the Father actually said or meant.
At a Protestant "worship" it's all about the person behind the pulpit. It is all about their interpretation of scripture. The summit of a Protestant worship is the sermon. Most Protestant churches don't even have an altar. So there is no real "worship" by sacrifice being done.
At a Catholic Mass the homily (sermon) is a minor part and is usually to link the reading from the Old Testament with the Gospel reading.
The most important part happens AFTER the homily: The Liturgy of the Eucharist. Offering up to God the only gift we have that is worthy of his glory--His Son on the cross.
It's so not a minor part that we all stand for the Gospel, and the priest raises the book with the Gospels in it over his head to proceed from the altar to the ambo (pulpit or lectern), to be read.
When the priest begins, he kisses the written word, and proclaims, "A reading from the Gospel of St. _______." Then he traces a big cross on the page.
And the laity reply, "Glory to you, O Lord.", and then we cross ourselves three times with our thumb and forefinger; on our forehead, our lips, and over our heart, saying silently, "May the Gospel always be on my mind, on my lips, and in my heart."
We don't sit until the priest is finished reading and proclaims, "The Gospel of the Lord." Then the laity respond, "Praise to you Lord Jesus Christ."
If THAT isn't taking it seriously or making a big deal out of it, I don't know would would be.
The altar is the center and focus of the Mass. That's where the worship is conducted, just as has always been since before Abraham.
The priest isn't the "star" of the show. A perfect Mass would be if nobody could remember who the priest was.
The center and focus of The Catholic Mass is receiving Jesus Christ, Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity in Holy Communion and hearing His Word.
It was the night of Jewish Passover . The Passover Prayers said in the Temple in Jerusalem were His Death Prayers. Every person before execution has a last meal. He incorporated His Death into the meal.
Mass is Jewish Passover Prayers said in the Temple Consecration of the last meal /Crucifixion and Resurrection.
Jews had true worship they worshipped the Messiah in advance but, had the Symbolic Paschal Lamb . On the night He was betrayed He becomes the Sacrificial lamb. My opinion is the Passover Prayers said in the Temple in Jerusalem are His Death Prayers and Can't be changed.
Riley..When Jesus said in John6:53..Then Jesus said unto them, Verily,verily,I say unto you,Except you eat the flesh of the Son of man,and drink his blood,ye have no life in you. Riley...if Jesus meant it literaly...HOW ARE YOU GOING TO LITERALLY EAT JESUS FLESH AND DRINK HIS BLOOD WHILE HE WAS STILL ALIVE?!?!TELL ME HOW..?! YOU CAN'T RILEY!! UNLESS 200-3OOO YEARS LATER THE CATHOLIC CHURCH GIVES A "SPECIAL PRIEST" SOME UNKNOWN POWERS GREATER THAN THAT OF MICHAEL THE ANGEL AND SERAPHIMS TO BRING JESUS DOWN FR9M HIS
Jesus Christ did mean it literally as He doubled down several times stating He gives us His FLESH and Blood. Unless we eat His Body and drink His Blood, we will have no life in us. If we eat and drink of Him unworthily, we are liable for The Body and Blood Of Jesus Christ. Even though some of His followers left Him, because they knew He meant it literally, He doubled down.
John 6:51 I am the living bread, who descended from heaven.
6:52 If anyone eats from this bread, he shall live in eternity. And the bread that I will give is my FLESH, for the life of the world.”
6:53 Therefore, the Jews debated among themselves, saying, “How can this man give us his flesh to eat?”
6:54 And so, Jesus said to them: “Amen, amen, I say to you, UNLESS YOU EAT THE FLESH OF THE SON OF MAN AND DRINK HIS BLOOD, YOU WILL NOT HAVE LIFE IN YOU.
6:55 Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up on the last day.
6:56 For my flesh is true food, and my blood is true drink.
6:57 Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood abides in me, and I in him.
6:58 Just as the living Father has sent me and I live because of the Father, so also whoever eats me, the same shall live because of me.
6:59 This is the bread that descends from heaven. It is not like the manna that your fathers ate, for they died. Whoever eats this bread shall live forever.”
1 Corinthians 11:23 For I have received from the Lord what I have also delivered to you: that the Lord Jesus, on the same night that he was handed over, took bread,
11:24 and giving thanks, he broke it, and said: “Take and eat. This is my body, which SHALL BE GIVEN UP FOR YOU. Do this in remembrance of me.”
11:25 Similarly also, the cup, after he had eaten supper, saying: “This cup is the new covenant in my blood. Do this, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of me.”
11:26 For whenever you eat this bread and drink this cup, you proclaim the death of the Lord, UNTIL HE RETURNS.
11:27 And so, whoever eats this bread, or drinks from the cup of the Lord, UNWORTHILY, SHALL BE LIABLE FOR THE BODY AND BLOOD OF THE LORD.
11:28 But let a man examine himself, and, in this way, let him eat from that bread, and drink from that cup.
11:29 For whoever eats and drinks unworthily, EATS and DRINKS A SENTENCE AGAINST HIMSELF, NOT DISCERNING IT TO BE THE BODY OF THE LORD.
Ovcourse is symbolic.Jews were forbidden to drink blood plus this is cannibalism.Also in Hebrews It’s written that Jesus died and suffered on the cross only once.He is not suffering any more.When Jesus said that He is the gate or the way He did not mean literally .There is so many verses proving that this is not what He meant literally.His word is our spiritual food. I could go on and on.
1 Corinthians 11:23 For I have received from the Lord what I have also delivered to you: that the Lord Jesus, on the same night that he was handed over, took bread,
11:24 and giving thanks, he broke it, and said: “Take and eat. This is my body, which SHALL BE GIVEN UP FOR YOU. Do this in remembrance of me.”
11:25 Similarly also, the cup, after he had eaten supper, saying: “This cup is the new covenant in my blood. Do this, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of me.”
11:26 For whenever you eat this bread and drink this cup, you proclaim the death of the Lord, UNTIL HE RETURNS.
11:27 And so, whoever eats this bread, or drinks from the cup of the Lord, UNWORTHILY, SHALL BE LIABLE FOR THE BODY AND BLOOD OF THE LORD.
11:28 But let a man examine himself, and, in this way, let him eat from that bread, and drink from that cup.
11:29 For whoever eats and drinks unworthily, EATS and DRINKS A SENTENCE AGAINST HIMSELF, NOT DISCERNING IT TO BE THE BODY OF THE LORD.
John 6:51 I am the living bread, who descended from heaven.
6:52 If anyone eats from this bread, he shall live in eternity. And the bread that I will give is my FLESH, for the life of the world.”
6:53 Therefore, the Jews debated among themselves, saying, “How can this man give us his flesh to eat?”
6:54 And so, Jesus said to them: “Amen, amen, I say to you, UNLESS YOU EAT THE FLESH OF THE SON OF MAN AND DRINK HIS BLOOD, YOU WILL NOT HAVE LIFE IN YOU.
6:55 Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up on the last day.
6:56 For my flesh is true food, and my blood is true drink.
6:57 Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood abides in me, and I in him.
6:58 Just as the living Father has sent me and I live because of the Father, so also whoever eats me, the same shall live because of me.
6:59 This is the bread that descends from heaven. It is not like the manna that your fathers ate, for they died. Whoever eats this bread shall live forever.”
People left Jesus as they knew He was not speaking metaphorically. He doubled down several times that He meant literally to eat and drink of Him for eternal life. We wouldn’t be held liable for eating and drinking of Him unworthily, if it was metaphorically. The Transubstantiation occurs when the Priest blesses the bread and wine, transforming them into The Body and Blood of Jesus Christ, our God and Savior.
Cannibalism is the eating of a bloody dead body, Jesus Christ is not dead and offers Himself to us in a non bloody way, even though He suffered a bloody Passion.
The consecration doesn't happen at prodestant churches. They aren't consecrated hands like Jesus made priest to be able to do thru him. They just see it as a symbol not really Jesus body and blood
I like this submission
IDOL WORSHIPPERS..!!
Excited, whew i get it but slooooowwwwww down a bit. Machine gun, rapid fire talk is slurred together to a point of ,,,,what was that??? Back off the throttle a bit Chris. You have time. Father Riley: excellent!
A young priest I know is 6 foot 9, 30 and speaks very slowly. You understand him clearly.
So you have the power to call down Jesus. Do you think you are a god unto yourself?
God acts through His Priests, who He gave His authority, power and Sacraments(The Keys to the Kingdom of Heaven) to. God uses His power to give Himself to us as He did at The Last Supper with His apostles. 1 Cor 11:23-29, Jn 6:51-59, Mk 3:14-19, Mt 10:1-4, 16:18-19, 2 Cor 5:20.
@@southernlady1109 Is your God so impotent that he needs man to act for Him. Think about what you are saying and understand the Bible. How about talking to me about the brothers and sisters of Jesus
@@IBenZik
Why are you trolling Catholic videos to slander God? Jesus Christ has brothers and sisters in His Kingdom, He has no siblings.
@@southernlady1109 John 2:12 After this, Jesus went down to Capernaum-he, his mother, his brothers, and his disciples-and they remained there for a few days.
Mark 6:3 This is the builder, the son of Mary, and the brother of James, Joseph, Judas, and Simon, isn’t it? His sisters are here with us, aren’t they?” And they were offended by him.
Mat 13:55-56 This is the builder’s son, isn’t it? His mother is named Mary, isn’t she? His brothers are James, Joseph, Simon, and Judas, aren’t they? 56 And his sisters are all with us, aren’t they?
These are from my Confraternity Bible I was forced to buy in 1966 when I went to my Roman catholic High School but was told never to read. Either someone lied to you or our old Roman catholic Bible lies. Please don't respond with the drivel about cousins, that goes directly back to someone or thing is lying.
I never slander my God but you seem to think sacrificing Jesus 240,000 times a day is good when He died once for all of us.
First, we must understand that the term brother has a wide semantic range in Scripture. It can mean a uterine brother, an extended relative, or even a spiritual brother. In Genesis 13:8 and 14:12, we read of one example of brother being used to describe an extended relationship: Abraham and Lot. Though they were actually uncle and nephew, they called one another “brother.” Moreover, in the New Testament, Jesus told us to call one another “brothers” in Matthew 23:8. The passage obviously does not mean to suggest that all Christians have the same physical mother.
Notice, the “James” of whom Paul was speaking was both a “brother of the Lord” and an “apostle.” There are two apostles named James among the 12. The first James is revealed to be a “son of Zebedee.” He most likely would not be the “James” referred to because according to Acts 12:1-2 he was martyred very early on. Even if it was him, his father was named Zebedee, not Joseph.
Paul more likely is referring to the second James who was an apostle, according to Luke 6:15-16. This James is revealed to have a father named Alphaeus, not Joseph. Thus, James the apostle and Jesus were not uterine brothers. Easy enough. Some will argue, however, that this “James” was not an apostle or that he was not one of the original 12. Though this is a possibility-others in the New Testament, such as Barnabas in Acts 14, are referred to as “apostles” in a looser sense-the argument from Scripture is weak. When Paul wrote about going “up to Jerusalem” to see Peter, he was writing about an event that occurred many years earlier, shortly after he had converted. He was basically going up to the apostles to receive approval lest he “should be running or had run in vain.” It would be more likely he would have here been speaking about “apostles” (proper), or “the twelve.”
But for those inclined to argue the point, the Catechism of the Catholic Church uses another line of reasoning:
The Church has always understood these passages as not referring to other children of the Virgin Mary. In fact James and Joseph, “brothers of Jesus,” are the sons of another Mary, a disciple of Christ, whom St. Matthew significantly calls “the other Mary.” They are close relations of Jesus, according to an Old Testament expression. (CCC 500)
The Catechism here refers to the fact that 14 chapters after we find the “brothers” of the Lord listed as “James, Joseph, Simon and Judas,” we find “James and Joseph” mentioned again, but this time their mother is revealed as being named Mary, but not Mary, the Mother of Jesus. We can conclude that “James and Joseph” are “brothers” of Jesus, but they are not uterine brothers.
But what about Matthew 1:24-25, and the claim Jesus was Mary’s “firstborn son” and that Joseph “knew her not until” Christ was born? Does Matthew here teach that Mary had other children?
Exodus 13:1-2 reveals something very important about the firstborn in Israel: “The Lord said to Moses, ‘Consecrate to me all the firstborn; whatever is the first to open the womb among the people of Israel, both of man and beast, is mine.’”
The “firstborn” were not given the title because there was a “second-born.” They were called “firstborn” at birth. Jesus being “firstborn” does not require that more siblings be born after him.
Until Then
Scripture’s statement that Joseph “knew [Mary] not until she brought forth her firstborn” would not necessarily mean they did “know” each other after she brought forth Jesus. Until is often used in Scripture as part of an idiomatic expression similar to our own usage in English. I may say to you, “Until we meet again, God bless you.” Does that necessarily mean after we meet again, God curse you? By no means. A phrase like this is used to emphasize what is being described before the until is fulfilled. It is not intended to say anything about the future beyond that point. Here are some biblical examples:
2 Samuel 6:23: And Michal the daughter of Saul had no child to (until) the day of her death. (Does this mean she had children after she died?)
1 Timothy 4:13: Until I come, attend to the public reading of scripture, to preaching, to teaching. (Does this mean Timothy should stop teaching after Paul comes?)
1 Corinthians 15:25: For he (Christ) must reign until he has put all his enemies under his feet. (Does this mean Christ’s reign will end? By no means! Luke 1:33 says, “he will reign over the house of Jacob forever and of his kingdom there shall be no end.”)
In recent years, some have argued that because Matthew 1:25 uses the Greek words heos hou for “until” whereas the texts I mentioned above from the New Testament use heos alone, there is a difference in meaning. The argument goes that Heos hou indicates the action of the first clause does not continue. Thus, Mary and Joseph “not having come together” would have ended after Jesus was born.
The problems with this theory begin with the fact that no available scholarship concurs with it. In fact, the evidence proves the contrary. Heos hou and heos are used interchangeably and have the same meaning. Acts 25:21 should suffice to clear up the matter: “But when Paul had appealed to be kept in custody for the decision of the emperor, I commanded him to be held until (Gk. heos hou) I could send him to Caesar.”
Does this text mean that Paul would not be held in custody after he was “sent” to Caesar? Not according to the biblical record. He would be held in custody while in transit (see Acts 27:1) and after he arrived in Rome for a time (see Acts 29:16). The action of the main clause did not cease with heos hou.
The Affirmative Argument
Now let’s look at some reasons to believe in Mary’s perpetual virginity. Among the many we could examine, we will briefly consider three:
1. In Luke 1:34, when Mary was told by the angel Gabriel that she was chosen to be the Mother of the Messiah, she asked the question, literally translated from the Greek, “How shall this be since I know not man?” This question makes no sense unless Mary had a vow of virginity.
When we consider that Mary and Joseph were already “espoused,” according to verse 27 of this same chapter, we understand Mary and Joseph already have what would be akin to a ratified marriage in the New Covenant. They were married. That would mean Joseph would have had the right to the marriage bed. Normally, after the espousal the husband would go off and prepare a home for his new bride and then come and receive her into his home where the union would be consummated. This is precisely why Joseph intended to “divorce her quietly” (Mt 1:19) when he later discovered she was pregnant.
This background is significant because a newly married woman would not ask the question “How shall this be?” She would know-unless, of course, that woman had taken a vow of virginity. Mary believed the message, but wanted to know how this was going to be accomplished. This indicates she was not planning on the normal course of events for her future with Joseph.
2. In John 19:26, Jesus gave his Mother to the care of John even though by law the next eldest sibling would have the responsibility to care for her. It is unthinkable that Jesus would take his Mother away from his family in disobedience to the law.
Some claim Jesus did this because his brothers and sisters were not there. They had left him. Thus, Jesus committed his Mother to John, who was faithful and present at the foot of the cross. This claim betrays a very low and unbiblical Christology. As John tells us, Jesus “knew all men” (cf. Jn 2:25). If James were his uterine brother, Jesus would have known he would be faithful along with his “brother” Jude. The fact is Jesus had no brothers and sisters, so he had the responsibility, on a human level, to take care of his Mother.
3. Mary is depicted as the spouse of the Holy Spirit in Scripture. In Luke 1:34, when Mary asks the angel how she will conceive a child, the angel responds: “The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you; therefore the child to be born will be called holy, the Son of God.”
This is nuptial language hearkening back to Ruth 3:8, where Ruth said to Boaz “spread your skirt over me” when she revealed to him his duty to marry her according to the law of Deuteronomy 25. When Mary became pregnant, Joseph would have been required to divorce her because she would then belong to another (see Dt 24:1-4; Jer 3:1). But when Joseph found out that “the other” was the Holy Spirit, the idea of his having conjugal relations with Mary was not a consideration.
Mary’s Protector
An obvious question remains: Why did St. Joseph then “take [Mary] his wife” according to Matthew 1:24 if she belonged to the Holy Spirit?
The Holy Spirit is Mary’s spouse, but Joseph was her spouse and protector on this earth for at least two obvious reasons. First, as Matthew points out in his genealogy in chapter 1, Joseph was in line to be a successor of David as King of Israel. Thus, if Jesus was to be the true “son of David” and king of Israel (see 2 Sm 7:14, Heb 1:5, Rv 19:16, 22:16), he needed to be the son of Joseph. As the only son of Joseph, even though adopted, he would have been in line for the throne.
Also, in a culture that did not take too kindly to espoused women getting pregnant by someone other than their spouse, Mary would have been in mortal danger. So Joseph became Mary’s earthly spouse and protector as well as the protector of the child Jesus.
Folksy, down with the kids, 'Catholics are just so normal, man'. Embarrassing.
You should be.
Is that why you're here? Because we are just so normal man?
There may be Catholics who do evil just like there are protestants do things their church says are wrong.
There are Catholics who are faithful to what the Church teaches and Catholics who choose to sin.
As Jesus said, there are both wheat and tares in the Church.
We don't judge anyone to be guilty by association.
We don't judge the truth of the Church by the people who don't follow what the Church teaches.
We don't judge Jesus as a traitor because of what Judas did.
We don't say all teachers are bad because of the few bad teachers who have molested their students.
I'm not making excuses, I'm explaining what the Church teaches.
All Catholics who are faithful to Church teaching are growing in love.
I had to pause after the first minute. The Mass is NOT a reenactment of the Last Supper. At Mass we are re-present at the foot of the Cross as Our Lord sacrifices Himself for our salvation.
OK. Back to the video.
Ah, there e go. He gets more specific around, oh, six min.s.
Christ is not sacrificed again, the Church teaches that there is only one sacrifice and Jesus is already in heaven. In the Mass, the sacrifice of the Cross is made present and we participate in this eternal event..
As a Protestant who is trying to understand Catholic faith, why wouldn’t you just take Jesus words in John 6 as simply an understanding of His overarching atoning work ….. having a deep understanding of the meaning of His life and sacrificial death… that’s what Jesus meant ….. at least that’s what a Protestant would say
…….And then living out that understanding as faith ?!?!?
Protestants, for some reason, have to deny the real presence in the Eucharist. Perhaps it is because they know that no Protestant minister or pastor can change bread and wine into the body and blood of Jesus.
John 6:51 I am the living bread, who descended from heaven.
6:52 If anyone eats from this bread, he shall live in eternity. And the bread that I will give is my FLESH, for the life of the world.”
6:53 Therefore, the Jews debated among themselves, saying, “How can this man give us his flesh to eat?”
6:54 And so, Jesus said to them: “Amen, amen, I say to you, UNLESS YOU EAT THE FLESH OF THE SON OF MAN AND DRINK HIS BLOOD, YOU WILL NOT HAVE LIFE IN YOU.
6:55 Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up on the last day.
6:56 For my flesh is true food, and my blood is true drink.
6:57 Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood abides in me, and I in him.
6:58 Just as the living Father has sent me and I live because of the Father, so also whoever eats me, the same shall live because of me.
6:59 This is the bread that descends from heaven. It is not like the manna that your fathers ate, for they died. Whoever eats this bread shall live forever.”
People left Jesus as they knew He was not speaking metaphorically. He doubled down several times that He meant literally to eat and drink of Him for eternal life. The Transubstantiation occurs when the Priest blesses the bread and wine, transforming them into The Body and Blood of Jesus Christ, our God and Savior.
1 Corinthians 11:23 For I have received from the Lord what I have also delivered to you: that the Lord Jesus, on the same night that he was handed over, took bread,
11:24 and giving thanks, he broke it, and said: “Take and eat. This is my body, which SHALL BE GIVEN UP FOR YOU. Do this in remembrance of me.”
11:25 Similarly also, the cup, after he had eaten supper, saying: “This cup is the new covenant in my blood. Do this, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of me.”
11:26 For whenever you eat this bread and drink this cup, you proclaim the death of the Lord, UNTIL HE RETURNS.
11:27 And so, whoever eats this bread, or drinks from the cup of the Lord, UNWORTHILY, SHALL BE LIABLE FOR THE BODY AND BLOOD OF THE LORD.
11:28 But let a man examine himself, and, in this way, let him eat from that bread, and drink from that cup.
11:29 For whoever eats and drinks unworthily, EATS and DRINKS A SENTENCE AGAINST HIMSELF, NOT DISCERNING IT TO BE THE BODY OF THE LORD.
Father, why don't you try saying the Mass 'ad orienem' and then the theatrics and distractions disappear. The congregation will have a greater devotion to the Eucharist if they don't see your face but only His face in the elevated host.
You should become a priest and then you can do it however you choose.
@@jeffscully50613 At 25, I was told I wasn't called to the priesthood. You have to be called.
“The last supper is made present again??? “. 🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻😩. Nope!!! What he just said is Protestant not Catholic.
Nope. That is exactly what happens at the Catholic Mass. We are taken back in time to the foot of the cross, literally. We are present at the crucifixion that to God--who exists outside of time--can still see His Son being crucified on the cross. It is a re-presentation of the crucifixion. Jesus is present on the altar in the species of bread and wine. He is there, body, blood, soul, and divinity, being offered up to His Father. EXACTLY how Jesus did it at the Last Supper, which was the very first Mass.
It's part of the passover sedar, not a new ritual, Yeshua Is a jew not a Catholic, I'm sorry to ruin your religion.
What is catholic mass all about? HOCUS POCUS.
Where do you get that idea from? Who taught you that? I think you may want to read some of the early church fathers to see what many have to say about the Eucharist, one of that heard the apostle John was Polycarp of Smyrna. He wrote 6 letters before he was martyred. I would recommend researching Martin Luther and Calvin and read their actual words and writing before they went in a different direction, or better yet listen to the series from Augustine Institute. It will show you that the faithful in the Church (only one Universal) all had faith in the Eucharist that Jesus talked about in John 6. Why do you think it was a hard teaching and so many left? It take faith and trust to believe in the words of Jesus. Just as it takes that same faith through the Holy Spirit to believe that he died and was resurrected. Is that hocus-pocus, some would say so and have. What was the Church for 1,500 before the Reformation? To know truth you have to search and pray with a sincere heart.
@@cindychronis7857 have you ever read a church approved book called "faith of millions"? In the book John O'Brien matter of factly describes what takes place in the eucharist. First and foremost The most important ? For you is where does scripture say ONLY the priest has the power to reach up into heaven and bring Christ down onto the altar? Besides if it is really the body of Christ how is it these wafers are made by nuns in some factory? So what happens to the leftover "body of Christ"? Does it return to it's wafer state. The wafer state that never really changed but you are told you must believe or you are damned? If you are to really drink his blood why doesn't your allow you to partake if the blood? You see the Hocus pocus in all this? That is not how scripture says the Last supper took place. O'Brien goes on to say that he has more power than the "blessed virgin Mary". I guess that's amounts to zero because Mary was not given any special powers, names by Jesus. In fact the in Luke you will find that she is called the "handmaid of the Lord". Or you can correct me if I'm
wrong.
So where did I get that from? From a church approved book that is nothing but church propaganda.
@Rbn Mnt even Lutherans and Anglicans believe in the literal presence of Christ in the Eucharist. I'm guessing you're shallower than them as well.
"Hocus pocus" ... well, I suppose you can have that interpretation if you choose. But it's interesting to me that protestants who are so laser focused on the Bible (alone) seem to feel comfortable ignoring the vary plain words (and context) of what Christ said in John 6, and in the institution narratives in the synoptic gospels. I pray that your hardened heart might one day come to see the tremendous gift Christ gave us ... food for the journey, the perfected manna. Pax Christi.
@@kdmdlo no we don't ignore the words of Christ. Christ did not literally mean to eat his body and drink his blood. Let me ask you, did Jesus turn into s door? Did Nicodemus go back into his mother's womb? When Jesus said we are the salt, did we turn into salt. So your church just arbitrarily picked John 6 to deceive many. Mostly by claiming that the priest has power to bring Christ onto the altar. Christ actually explains what he meant later in v 63. It's just that your church ignores the latter part of John 6. Jesus says that it is the Spirit that quickeneth, the flesh profits nothing. He said the words that he spoke are Spirit and THEY are life. What does your so called first pope say? He echoes Christ's words in his epistles when he said that Christ died ONCE, the just for the unjust and was quickened by the spirit. I encourage you to read Hebrews 7, 9, and 10. There you will find that Jesus made ONE sacrifice, ONCE for all time. You Catholics seem to have trouble with the words once or one. Such as one God, one mediator. And if you notice those Hebrew scriptures I mentioned repeatedly use the words one and once for a reason. i wonder why Jesus proclaimed "it is finished" as he died? Yet your church continues to crucify Christ over and over and over. It's like Hebrews say the priest continues to make the same sacrifice that can not take away any sins. You know why? Because the one time death if Christ on the cross was sufficient. I wonder why Christ said "it is finished? One quick side question why is the next coming if Christ called the "second coming"? Why does scripture say that when he comes it will be with power and glory and that EVERY eye will see him. Yet you Catholics see him everyday? I guess the biggest catholic problem with the eucharist is where does scripture say that only a priest can do the mass? Where does scripture say that the priest has the power to bring Christ down onto the altar? Interesting that John O'Brien wrote a book, I am sure you are aware of it because it is approved reading by your church. It's "faith of millions". In that book he says a priest has more power than seraphim and cherubim. Now get this, he says that the priest has even more power than the "blessed virgin Mary". Pretty amazing when we all know Mary was given no special powers. At least not anything verifiable by scripture. But according to the church, Mary has the same powers as God. So a priest is more powerful than God? I can't find any of this in scripture anywhere. Can you help me out. Besides you Catholics all say that you must eat his body and drink his blood. Truth is your hocus pocus church doesn't allow you to drink the so called blood, does it? So you and your church violates the very scripture you claim to abide by and that protestants ignore. So where does scripture say NOT to drink the blood because your priest is afraid you'll spill it? Finally, if the wafer is really the body of Christ, why are the wafers made in some factory by nuns? Another point. What happens to the remaining parts of the body? Does the priest return Jesus back to heaven? So you see your church's undignified manner in which it performs this mass is nothing like described in scripture and raises many questions you have no answers for.
“Picture then the high priest Christ leaving the sacristy of heaven for the altar of Calvary. He has already put on the vestment of our human nature, the maniple of our suffering, the stole of the priesthood, the chasuble of the Cross. Calvary is his cathedral; the rock of Calvary is the altar stone; the sun turning to red is the sanctuary lamp; Mary and John are the living side altars; the Host is His Body; the wine is His Blood. He is upright as Priest, yet He is prostrate as Victim. His Mass is about to begin.” (From Calvary and the Mass, Fulton Sheen)
🙏🙏🙏