Being born in 2001, I may have missed the era of white-and-red McLaren (1974-1996) but I'm glad to witness the era of silver-and-red McLaren (2007-2013)! I miss the good old days of silver McLaren and I hope McLaren uses silver again, in case Mercedes sticks to black this year!
@@rafifprahastya9079 There's no information about this, but, or they were testing the new engine in the old car, or they couldn't show the TAG's logo because of the contract with Honda.
2018 engine is Renault and in 2006 Pedro De La Rosa replaced Juan Pablo Montoya mid season also in 2016 Stoffel raced for McLaren same for Button in 2017 Great vid thougt. Sauber next plz
I missed Peter Revson, Jochen Mass, Nigel Mansell, Jan Magnussen, Alex Wurz, and Stoffel Vandoorne (2016), Kevin Magnussen (2015) and Pedro de la Rosa (2005 and 2006)
2:48 MP4/3 Drivers stated as Alain Prost and Stefan Johanson. Engine is stated as TAG. However, that's Senna in the cockpit, and Honda logo on the nosecone reveals Honda engine...
Bruce McLaren was killed in a Can Am test June 2nd 1970, so he could not drive M19 1971 -- 1972. M23 was driven by numerous drivers more, Peter Revson, Jochen Mass, Mike Hailwood and Nelson Piquet included. And there was also McLaren M30, which did some races 1980.
There were NO MP/4-32 and 33 models. In the last 3 years, they were called MCL-32, 33, 34. MP/4 was synonymous with Ron Dennis. Now, he's no longer with us (with the team, he's not dead), it's gonna be the MCL prefix.
@Hemersonr Souza . . . I'm familiar with F1 racing from the 1960s, where the labeling of the M5A is a BIG error; as that model never had an engine cover, no wings, and the BRM V12 exhaust pipes were prominently displayed. The person producing this video post was a hack that created a click-bait post.
Based upon reading prior comments, and even from my own knowledge of F1 racing from the 1960s, this video post is rife with errors. That image of what is claimed to be the M5A is NOT that model; as there was no engine enclosure for the M5A, and the BRM V12 exhaust pipes were of a different configuration than what the image shows. That image claiming to be the M5A is a later McLaren model with a Ford-Cosworth engine.
I absolutely agree. Note: Bruce was killed in a testing crash in June 1970. So there are some inaccuracies stated here for the early years. Note: Peter Revson drove the M19C and the M23 with Yardley livery until the end of the 73 season. Whereas , Emerson Fittipaldi drove the 74 season. Note: Peter Gethin and Dan Gurney drove the M7B after Bruce's death. Thank the stars you don't do history of McLaren Can Am cars. Also McLaren designated the M1A & B were Can Am sports racers along with the M6 & M8 series. The Papaya Orange paint was adopted for all cars in 1967.
McLaren stopped using Honda engines since 2018 when they changed to the Renault engines. And the nomenclature or the cars changed in 2017 from MP4 to MCL
1) The M26 showed is a M23, and the M26 Made his debut in 1977 2) No Jochen Mass in 1974-1977, Peter Revson in 1973 Nigel Mansell in 1995 and De La Rosa in 2005-2006? (Also Vandoorne and Butto raced for one race respectively in 2016 and 2017) 3) 2:48 What The Hell? Why don't putting a normal MP4/3 instead of a hybrid car used after the end of the season for honda testing? 4) Honda enigne in 2018? Fernando be like: What a yoke...
Peugeot had a great running in Le Mans with a V10 two wins. And it want to beat Renault which was also a French company, that was doing well since 1991. And won the titles in 92-93. So the engine proved to be strong, but unreliable. It simply didn't finish the races. Mclaren boss Ron Donnis still believed in the for 95. But Mercedes was unhappy with the results at the young team Sauber during the 93-94 stint. So they thought, we need to go an top tier team. They thought of mclaren. Williams and Bennetton already had works engines for 95. To be in Mclaren in 1995, Mercedes did a much better price than peugeot, and eventually the engines were kind of free and between the 96-97 seasons Mercedes would eventually buy Mclaren. Mercedes was not doing well in Fórmula 1. The unthinkable decision was to move to Mercedes. Mclaren Peugeot was better than Mclaren Mercedes in its first years, 8 podiums against miserably 2 respectively. The question should be why Mercedes? In that point of 1994, it went to be the fourth season with four different engine for Mclaren. At long run peugeot didn't went to be victorious at formula 1. Mercedes is supreme. But in 94 peugeot seems to be the right bet to beat the Frenchs at Williams and Bennetton.
Because that was the best choice back then. It was already a small miracle that the MP4/8 with a Ford engine could actually compete at this level in 1993. They had the client version, compared to Benetton (official Ford partner), thankfully the chassis was great (comparatively, Benetton did some poor weight balancing on the B193, I understand), and active suspension gave the top teams like McLaren a considerable advantage. Ron Dennis had to negotiate through the whole season both to keep Senna in, and to be supplied the best possible Ford engines, which he only got in the latter part of it. McLaren tried the Lamborghini engines from the Larousse team in Estoril in late 93, with apparently good success, but...Lambo wasn't ready to put in the money to make it evolve. In F1, when you can't evolve, you regress, plain and simple. Lambo was fed up with being with the worst teams, and not there anymore from 94' onwards. Peugeot wanted in, and due to what Paulo Lucio explained above, was viewed as a very tough F1 motorist in the making (the Le Mans-winning V10 was also a 3.5L, and Peugeot had been very strong in WRC beforehand). Do remember that being French and seeing compatriot Renault win in F1 does mean something on top. Mercedes wasn't even official in F1 until 95, they sponsored Sauber and Illmor, as they did in Gr.C racing, to little avail. And they were buddies, as they won had several championships with them in Gr.C. . All other 94' teams had either a contract set in stone with a manufacturer, or a Ford HB-series client engine, except Mugen-Honda, which switched in 93-94, but Mugen was small fry compared to mother company Honda, or Peugeot. And perhaps Ron Dennis hadn't liked Honda pulling out in the middle of the previous season, leaving him virtually engine-less. Effectively McLaren could go back to being a Ford HB-series customer (while Benetton in 94' had the much superior Zetec-R), have an unreliable, unevolving Lambo V12 engine, or try with Peugeot. And from Peugeot's viewpoint, McLaren was ideal too, as the other teams weren't front-runners much. McLaren-Peugeot was, on paper, a great wedding. The Peugeot V10 sucked in 94', but it was a relatively powerful & reliable engine through all the latter part of the 90s. A pity Jordan couldn't quite make it among the top teams reliably in spite of it, and the Prost chassis were terrible (Prost simply couldn't find money). The pressure for a 100% French team was big in France, and both partners felt it.
So many approximations in this video.. First of all, Bruce McLaren died in 1970 and how he can drive in 1971/1972/1973 with the M14D, M19A and M19C. Also, why the Senna helmet is on the M29?
2020: MCL35 engine: Renault, Drivers: Carlos Sainz Jr. - Lando Norris
In 2021 they will change to mercedes engines
MCL36: engine: Mercedes Variants: MCL36 2021 drivers: Daniel Riciardo - Lando Norris
@@ferestrod3242 They calling it the MCL35M (M for mercedes)
@@ferestrod3242 it’s the mcl35m lol
@@pi_za8214 no shit Sherlock I made that comment before they anounced the name...
A ''smooth operation'' since 1966.
Ha ha ha
@Ruzzel Tolentino No, I think it was Darren
Bruce McLaren died in 1970. Was his ghost driving the 71' 72' and 73' cars?
Ikr
His brother
Yup, probably meant in spirit
Ye
🏎️🏁Mclaren 🏎️ 🏁 ♥️🏁Ayrton Senna ♥️🏁
Bruce mclaren
@@eh-nz3mn 👍👍👍👍👍👍
Mika Häkkinen 😎💞🔥🏁
👍 👍 👍 👍
@@jann1k_MSC47 👍💖👍💖👍💖
McLaren MP4, pintura Marlboro, Honda e Ayrton Senna. Que grande época essa equipe viveu!!!
4:08 MP4/11, MP4/12 and MP4/13 best looking cars for me
MP4/4 is godly
Being born in 2001, I may have missed the era of white-and-red McLaren (1974-1996) but I'm glad to witness the era of silver-and-red McLaren (2007-2013)! I miss the good old days of silver McLaren and I hope McLaren uses silver again, in case Mercedes sticks to black this year!
MCL-34
2019
Variants: MCL-34
Engines: Renault
Drivers: Carlos Sainz and Lando Norris
Information of 2019
Thank me later
2:52 wrong car wrong driver
The car is right. It was a test Senna made in the previous season car.
@@Rodrigo.de.Fenix.01 on point
Honda's brand reveals that's MP4/4
@@Rodrigo.de.Fenix.01 honda branding
@@rafifprahastya9079 There's no information about this, but, or they were testing the new engine in the old car, or they couldn't show the TAG's logo because of the contract with Honda.
2018 engine is Renault and in 2006 Pedro De La Rosa replaced Juan Pablo Montoya mid season also in 2016 Stoffel raced for McLaren same for Button in 2017
Great vid thougt. Sauber next plz
It even showed "PEDRO" on the 2005 car
2018 mclaren used Renault engine, not Honda engine
2:48 Senna tests mp4/3?
My favorite Formula 1 team.
1:25 Jepp, that model fought for 5 years.
2:55 MP4/4 ....nuff said...
Nigel Mansell drove for McLaren in 1995 for about 2 races
2:55
Here it comes... *Here it COMES*
Last one is Renault mate. But great video nonetheless.
Nope, that's the McLaren 2018
@@sportshistorian6855 I meant the engine, Mclaren ditched Honda for the 2018 season.
Ah yes.. You are absolutely correct!
Renault is their main engine now and now both driven by Sainz and Norris in 2019
Lol that is 2018 mclaren
Gp2 engine 7:10
Aaarrgh
3:00 OH MY GOD
sooooo amazing lul
we don't talk about the mp4/18
This has to be the smoothest operation I've ever seen
amazing video. thank you
I missed Peter Revson, Jochen Mass, Nigel Mansell, Jan Magnussen, Alex Wurz, and Stoffel Vandoorne (2016), Kevin Magnussen (2015) and Pedro de la Rosa (2005 and 2006)
7:06 GP2 Engine ™
2:48 MP4/3 Drivers stated as Alain Prost and Stefan Johanson. Engine is stated as TAG. However, that's Senna in the cockpit, and Honda logo on the nosecone reveals Honda engine...
Probably testing the Honda engines in preparation for the MP4-4
Mclaren of 1993 and 1994 was the most elegant Mclaren ever! And maybe the most elegant between all F1 ever.
Team: McLaren
Engine: Honda
Sponsor: Marlboro
Drivers: Prost/Senna
Legendary.
Bruce McLaren was killed in a Can Am test June 2nd 1970, so he could not drive M19 1971 -- 1972. M23 was driven by numerous drivers more, Peter Revson, Jochen Mass, Mike Hailwood and Nelson Piquet included. And there was also McLaren M30, which did some races 1980.
love this video 🧡
1:39 what about Jochen Mass?
Whats with Jochen Mass? He drove from 74 till 77 for Mc
Hay versiones que no pusiste y son exclusivas ejempli mp4/10b
The MP4/8 and the MP4/3 are underrated man
Why when they show the mp4/3 do they show Senna in the cockpit? And they misspell Martin Brundle.
2021
Car : Mclaren MCL35M
Engine : Mercedes
Drivers : Lando Norris, Daniel Ricciardo
2005 - missing Wurz and de la Rosa
anyways, super video :))
5:32 pedro de la rosa and alex wurz? didnt they drive in 2005 also? and in 2006 pedro de la rosa replaced montoya at the end of the season
2007 is the coolest F1 car in history and nothing will change my mind.
5:28 My favourite car
At 5:39 did u forget to put de la rosa on drivers, or he was just a test driver because he drove a f1 race in the mclaren
McLaren seems like they have been humbled over tge last few years and are now on the right path. I wanna see them win again
There were NO MP/4-32 and 33 models. In the last 3 years, they were called MCL-32, 33, 34. MP/4 was synonymous with Ron Dennis. Now, he's no longer with us (with the team, he's not dead), it's gonna be the MCL prefix.
Most beautiful: 5:20 MP4-19 of 2004 and 3:40 MP4-8 of 1993
McLaren - the BEST!
Its all about the driver
@@diamondghc9154 yeah, the driver, not the Honda engine.
what do you think about correlating those models and the titles?
@Hemersonr Souza . . . I'm familiar with F1 racing from the 1960s, where the labeling of the M5A is a BIG error; as that model never had an engine cover, no wings, and the BRM V12 exhaust pipes were prominently displayed.
The person producing this video post was a hack that created a click-bait post.
Nothing will ever beat Marlboro McLaren Honda
Yes ferrari 412 t2 best looking f1 for me
Name of first music pls?
Senna the best driver of HISTORY
O MP4/10 tinha 2 aerofólios. Me lembro que isso além de ser o maior diferencial do carro, causou muitas discussões sobre o regulamento.
Would have been nice to include the designer and position in championship
MP4/3 drivers Alain Prost and Stefan Johansson but picture has senna behind the wheel 🤔🤔
The MP4/20 is the most badass looking F1 car I know
5:39 Montoya moved to NASCAR before Hungary and was replaced by De la Rosa
2:51 picture isn’t from 1987
Jenson button is by far my favourite f1 driver ever
Based upon reading prior comments, and even from my own knowledge of F1 racing from the 1960s, this video post is rife with errors. That image of what is claimed to be the M5A is NOT that model; as there was no engine enclosure for the M5A, and the BRM V12 exhaust pipes were of a different configuration than what the image shows. That image claiming to be the M5A is a later McLaren model with a Ford-Cosworth engine.
I absolutely agree. Note: Bruce was killed in a testing crash in June 1970. So there are some inaccuracies stated here for the early years. Note: Peter Revson drove the M19C and the M23 with Yardley livery until the end of the 73 season. Whereas , Emerson Fittipaldi drove the 74 season. Note: Peter Gethin and Dan Gurney drove the M7B after Bruce's death.
Thank the stars you don't do history of McLaren Can Am cars. Also McLaren designated the M1A & B were Can Am sports racers along with the M6 & M8 series. The Papaya Orange paint was adopted for all cars in 1967.
Honda label on mp 4/3?
Yeah, and Senna-helmet... :)
Bruce died in 1970 soooooooo yeaaaaaaa
Hahaha
High nosed Mclaren with red-white livery was the best one they had imo
2018のエンジンはルノーでしょ？
やり直し‼️
19 likes, 0 dislikes.
SO muss das
2018 was Renault not Honda as listed in the video
Sennas helmet on the mp4/3 yet you list someone else.
Oh man I did not know ford was so involved in formula 1 in the 70s.
Cosworth.
Jochen Mass was also missing
MP4/15 is the most beautiful in my opinion
In 2006 Pedro de la Rosa also drove for McLaren and from 2017 onwards the car was called MCL**
2:45 my man... senna was driving for lotus
2021: MCL35M
Engine: Mercedes
Drivers: Lando Norris and Daniel Riccardo
My favorite mclaren colour was 1998-2004 west black silver
some errors: bruce died in 1970 at goodwood
Where did you get the photo with the M28, with the 69 number and Jacky Ickx Hellmet ?
I think it does not exist in real life ? Anyone knows ?
M28/M29/M28F/Mp4/1
Epic music
Everyone gangsta until mclaren makes a mp5
All messed up, geez.
McLaren stopped using Honda engines since 2018 when they changed to the Renault engines. And the nomenclature or the cars changed in 2017 from MP4 to MCL
1) The M26 showed is a M23, and the M26 Made his debut in 1977
2) No Jochen Mass in 1974-1977, Peter Revson in 1973 Nigel Mansell in 1995 and De La Rosa in 2005-2006? (Also Vandoorne and Butto raced for one race respectively in 2016 and 2017)
3) 2:48 What The Hell? Why don't putting a normal MP4/3 instead of a hybrid car used after the end of the season for honda testing?
4) Honda enigne in 2018? Fernando be like: What a yoke...
also wurz in 2005
My favorite is the West Cars from 97-04
Wow my McLarens I Love my McLarens of my ENGLAND
Obrigado = thank you
2:32 Why we came for, Niki Lauda!
Until to This Day I still can’t get One thing:
WHY PEUGEOT?
Peugeot had a great running in Le Mans with a V10
two wins.
And it want to beat Renault which was also a French company, that was doing well since 1991. And won the titles in 92-93.
So the engine proved to be strong, but unreliable. It simply didn't finish the races.
Mclaren boss Ron Donnis still believed in the for 95. But Mercedes was unhappy with the results at the young team Sauber during the 93-94 stint. So they thought, we need to go an top tier team. They thought of mclaren. Williams and Bennetton already had works engines for 95.
To be in Mclaren in 1995, Mercedes did a much better price than peugeot, and eventually the engines were kind of free and between the 96-97 seasons Mercedes would eventually buy Mclaren.
Mercedes was not doing well in Fórmula 1. The unthinkable decision was to move to Mercedes. Mclaren Peugeot was better than Mclaren Mercedes in its first years, 8 podiums against miserably 2 respectively. The question should be why Mercedes? In that point of 1994, it went to be the fourth season with four different engine for Mclaren. At long run peugeot didn't went to be victorious at formula 1. Mercedes is supreme. But in 94 peugeot seems to be the right bet to beat the Frenchs at Williams and Bennetton.
Peugeot are strong
@@moulinberron3669 😂😂😂 no
Because that was the best choice back then. It was already a small miracle that the MP4/8 with a Ford engine could actually compete at this level in 1993. They had the client version, compared to Benetton (official Ford partner), thankfully the chassis was great (comparatively, Benetton did some poor weight balancing on the B193, I understand), and active suspension gave the top teams like McLaren a considerable advantage. Ron Dennis had to negotiate through the whole season both to keep Senna in, and to be supplied the best possible Ford engines, which he only got in the latter part of it.
McLaren tried the Lamborghini engines from the Larousse team in Estoril in late 93, with apparently good success, but...Lambo wasn't ready to put in the money to make it evolve. In F1, when you can't evolve, you regress, plain and simple. Lambo was fed up with being with the worst teams, and not there anymore from 94' onwards.
Peugeot wanted in, and due to what Paulo Lucio explained above, was viewed as a very tough F1 motorist in the making (the Le Mans-winning V10 was also a 3.5L, and Peugeot had been very strong in WRC beforehand). Do remember that being French and seeing compatriot Renault win in F1 does mean something on top.
Mercedes wasn't even official in F1 until 95, they sponsored Sauber and Illmor, as they did in Gr.C racing, to little avail. And they were buddies, as they won had several championships with them in Gr.C. .
All other 94' teams had either a contract set in stone with a manufacturer, or a Ford HB-series client engine, except Mugen-Honda, which switched in 93-94, but Mugen was small fry compared to mother company Honda, or Peugeot. And perhaps Ron Dennis hadn't liked Honda pulling out in the middle of the previous season, leaving him virtually engine-less.
Effectively McLaren could go back to being a Ford HB-series customer (while Benetton in 94' had the much superior Zetec-R), have an unreliable, unevolving Lambo V12 engine, or try with Peugeot. And from Peugeot's viewpoint, McLaren was ideal too, as the other teams weren't front-runners much. McLaren-Peugeot was, on paper, a great wedding.
The Peugeot V10 sucked in 94', but it was a relatively powerful & reliable engine through all the latter part of the 90s. A pity Jordan couldn't quite make it among the top teams reliably in spite of it, and the Prost chassis were terrible (Prost simply couldn't find money). The pressure for a 100% French team was big in France, and both partners felt it.
Err... I think that the mp4-33 has a Renault engine not a Honda engine
So many approximations in this video..
First of all, Bruce McLaren died in 1970 and how he can drive in 1971/1972/1973 with the M14D, M19A and M19C.
Also, why the Senna helmet is on the M29?
They should back to silver painting with orange elements
you should took one side from each car to see difference
well, the mp4/33 actually used a renault engine
2:52 It is MP4/3B.... using HONDA power
Nothing is like MP4/4
nao adiante a epoca que mais marcou a Mclaren foi anos 80 e 90
95年はナイジがいた。マグヌッセンも1回走った。プジョーの94年は1回だけフィリップ アリオーも走った。
2006年はモントーヤ退場でデラロサ、ブルツも走った。
私が子供のころにF1といったら白と赤のこのマシンだった
nice
The Mp4/9 Testcar had a Lamborghini engine 😉
Pretty sure Bruce McLaren was dead in 1972-73 unfortunately, and therefore could not physically drive the M19C :/
@Nathan Buisson . . .You called it right! Bruce was killed in 1970 while testing his M8 series CanAm race cars.
Hot take. But mclaren have never had a bad livery
I remember when McLaren had back and red instead of blue and orange
Literally as the cars went further down the grid the livery gets worse and worse
2:52??? Mp4/3 used to TAG Porsche!!! and Senna not driving in 87'
What he meant was that in 1987 Senna auditioned with McLaren.
I wish the MP4/30 was white/red
Much slower than before
Fernando Alonso
GP2 engine, GP2 ...