thank you im a armature went to broadcasting school but never got a dagree, i bought this cam at my last ditch effort to create more an not give up my dreams on being creative iv been in bands and film projects all my life but once my 30s hit the higher end in life went to work work work, still working hard but this lil cam is going to be my only hope in producing one of the best lil rock oprea the worlds never seen. this video just put a lot of suger plums in my head. this thing is my lil engine that can and will.
most of us (like me) just get the thing working and some of us go 100% into the thing and take full advantage of all features. Well done for such an entertaining video with real technical content, you are such a great role model to mankind......God bless and keep on shooting.
Thanks Andy! Wow! "a great role model to mankind". As far as compliments go, I don't think that can be beat. I'll have to request that be put on my gravestone.
I bought my ax53 in 2018 finally upgrading my sony dv camera from 2003. I love it but feel i do not use it enough. I love making home videos and family gatherings but it has been in its drawer since covid. thanks to your video, i think its time to break it out again and just start filming shots. great content Dan, most appreciated, even if it is a couple of years old :)
With camcorders it takes years or even never for manufacturers to refresh to newer models. Very different from the camera market in general. If the video camera serves my purpose, I try not to think in terms of missing out on the latest and greatest. My advice to anyone who used to play music or used shoot video or used to do something else is take that guitar, camera or exercise machine and sit it out right there in everyday plain sight. You'll pick it up and start fiddling with it. It tends to renew your interest and before long it becomes a routine and you'll advance from where you were before.
Been shooting with an FDR- AX33 since 2015. I know many of your suggestions, but have learned a few new ones in the process. I found a Mennon lens shade solved my gimbal/wide angel vignetting issues. The problem with a UV filter is the occasional lens halo reflection that would appear in the recorded footage. I gave up on it to prevent the issue. I do use Mennon's white balance capable cap for protection when not shooting. As a fellow YTer I made sure to give you a "like" and watched the entire video. Plus I made sure to comment. We can all use the points that YT attributes to these. I do a lot of run and gun so BOSS in vital for me. I wish theey could add it to a camera like the 700.
Thanks Chris. I can see how the big Mennon rectangular shade would be out far enough to not vignette and the white balance cap is a cool feature. You and I both wish the AX700 had BOSS. It would be the "perfect camcorder".
@@DanChanPiano I've watched several YT videos on mounting the 700 on a gimbal. It is tedious and the combined rig is cumbersome. Love all its features ,but it is not a run and gun camcorder in my opinion.
@@chrislauterbach8856 By comparison to AX33 / AX53 the AX700 is a fairly large and at 2 lbs, hefty camcorder. I wouldn't consider it a good gimble candidate. Even if it had BOSS, I don't consider BOSS a gimble. BOSS shines by eliminating the micro jitters handholding static shots. It smooths and stabilizes small camera moves such as push ins and lateral trucking. Walking or running with BOSS does not give gimble like results. I have a Feyutech Scorp mini on order and I'm really hoping I can fly the AX53 on it. Kind of an unresearched impulse buy as the gimble is designed for small mirrorless, phones and action cameras. The length of a camcorder is never in the compatibility specs. If it mounts, I'll be a happy guy.
This video was shot with a variety of cameras, but I did shoot the opening titled clips with the AX53. I presume you are liking those better than your full frame camera. Much more light gathering resulting in less noise in a full frame sensor compared to the tiny 1/2.5" sensor in the AX 53. It could be that there's more going on than sensor size alone. But if the end result is you liking what you see, who cares about the technical stuff.
Hi, Great video. I have set the stabilisation to Active for 4K@25fps on my AX53. However, as soon as I remove the battery, it goes back to Standard. Is this normal behaviour? I would prefer it stayed as Active since I only shoot in 4K.
My camera retains all user settings after battery changes. I shoot the AX53 in 4k@30fps. For a test and reference, give that setting a go and see if you get the return to default. This would be telling. At least you would know it's a condition of your res/fps setting. If you're stuck with having to change back each time , you could look at it on the positive side. A quick check of all settings before shooting prevents errors. BTW I enjoyed your channel.
Thanks. I was already in XAVC S 4K@25fps but just tried re-setting to XAVC S 4K@25fps by: File Format>XAVC S 4K> OK..executing...and it seems to stick on Active now, even when removing the battery! Here's to hoping the setting sticks with a longer battery removal. Not quite sure what's caused this. I may have as you suggest unknowingly had some other setting changed or Mode, that prevented retention of the Active Stabilisation. Once again, thanks for your video.@@DanChanPiano
I own a JVC GYMH 170 and many DSLR but I'm looking for a SONY AX53 because I record a lot of CONCERTS. I want more zoom and clearity than my JVC provides. Thanks DAN by your AMAZING video!! Congrats.
Excellent video! Thank you for sharing all of your tips and information. I have all of your camcorder videos saved and continually utilize them as valuable references. If they were books, they would be worn out! I'm hoping you will publish additional photography/videography videos in the future. It appears you are using a holster for your Sony AX53. Could you provide the manufacturer and model of it? Thanks!
Great to know the videos are appreciated and of value to people. Thanks for the encouragement. I like the quick access and simplicity of holster cases designed for SLRs with telephoto lenses. They're very good when repurposed for small camcorders. The Tamarac case has long been discontinued. I also own a Lowepro TLZ2, also discontinued. You just have to buy what is available in a "holster camera case". Search that term on B&H and choices of top loading styles will result. In the specs will be the dimensions, so that you can get the size to fit your needs.
Great info. I use a step up myself to 72mm. My filters are a K&F UF filter, and then a K&F Variable filter 1-5 stop with 28 multi-layer coatings. Good stuff. saved this one.
Glad you liked it! I was not familiar with the K&F brand but upon searching, they seem to be an option I would consider in the future. They really have an extensive ND lineup. Thanks for mentioning them.
Great video & Thanks for sharing….I own a Sony AX53 myself and shoot Dragraces in 1080p@60fps….I want to shoot Dragraces in 4k@60fps but the AX53 can only do 30fps in 4k….So my question is “ How on earth did you manage to get your AX53 to shoot those action shots so smoothly & look more like 60fps than 30fps ? I really wanna shoot the NHRA FINALS in Pomona in 4k this November 2023 but I want it to look like 60fps as you accomplished in your fast shots of the racecar & motorcycle jumps. Thank you for your expertise 🙏🙏🔥🔥🔥👏👏👏
Thanks Frank. As you stated, the AX53's top 4K frame rate is 30fps. Not all footage in this video was shot with the AX53. I made sure to label the clips that were at the video's start to demo the camera's resolution, and I used AX53 shots for many of the clips but not all. The race cars is found video. I shot the slo mo motorcycle footage in 1080 @120fps on my AX700. When talking to subjects non specific to the AX53, like the use of viewfinders I never claimed what you were seeing was AX53 footage. So, I guess it was a bit misleading to those who thought everything was AX53. I see movie footage shot at 24fps where the camera is whipping around and subjects are moving quickly and the motion blur is minimal. That is a mystery to me. They say that the eyes and brain are used to seeing blur as you turn your head and then when you stop, the scene comes into focus. I started paying attention to pans in movies and television and yes, there is motion blur during the pan then sharp focus when the pan ends. So I guess it's true, just never analyzed until you pay it some attention. My Panasonic X2000 shoots 4K@60 and I can pan and shoot action much more to my liking than 30fps where I'm making a conscious effort to pan very slowly.
I have owned camcorders in the past and they all had an internal CR2032 battery required to maintain power and store your settings eg date & time etc, when the main battery was removed. Occasionally the CR2032 battery needed replacing and could be easily accessed behind a small cover and replaced with a new one. However, with the Sony AX53, things are different. You have no access to the small built-in internal battery! The internal battery on my AX53 seems to have come to the end of its life and so settings are no longer retained when you remove the external battery. Anyone else have this problem on the AX53 and found a solution?
It seems like the ECM-B1M is not compatible in digital mode. Does this mean that it also requires an audio cable? Or is audio still passed the the interface?
The mic is powered and passes it’s signal through the hot shoe interface. It works with any Sony camera that has a multi interface shoe. There is nowhere to even plug in a cable. Later cameras are compatible to receive the microphone’s digital processing whereas all the other MI Sony cameras get an analog signal. Both signals sound good.
@@DanChanPiano thank you for sharing this information. I am very interested in getting an AX700 for its stabilization properties. My current cameras need post stabilization in Catalyst Prepare to look good.
Many thanks for sharing Dan. I saw a plate you attached at the bottom of the Sony FDR-AX53 but no description on it on the accessories list. Can you share how to get that plate (the name and type)?
You're welcome. The plate is a quick release plate from a Benro tripod. Tripod manufactures have standardized their quick release plates and there are two main types, Manfrotto 501 and arca-swiss. This one is the smaller arca swiss.
Here's the step up ring www.amazon.com/55-72MM-Step-Up-Adapter-Stepping-Infrared/dp/B087PQVW22/ref=sr_1_3?crid=18HZIEH0YAGCM&keywords=step+up+ring+adapter+55mm+to&qid=1677100159&s=electronics&sprefix=step+up+ring+adapter+55mm+to+%2Celectronics%2C139&sr=1-3 Exact lens hood doesn't seem to still be available but there are others, so you'll have to do your own research to find the 72mm lens hood. Copy and paste these words into your search and I'm sure you'll be able to come up with something. 72mm Reversible Tulip Flower Lens Hood Set, Unique Design Camera Lens Hood for Canon Nikon Sony DSLR + Center Pinch Lens Cap with Cap Keeper Leash + Microfiber Cleaning Cloth
I own the FDR-AX53 and use it as a second and third cam for long run takes and live events. The DJI Wireless LAV system works as well as any shotgun mic, for about the same money. You get two mics, both that can record standalone with no receiver. If you edit in post, it's ideal IMO. Thanks for the info and time spent to share this info!
Thanks for commenting a valuable tip. It reminded me to continue researching DJI wireless vs Rode Go II, which I have in my shopping list. So far DJI is winning. I'm also interested in the wireless headphone monitoring hack that I'm sure both systems can perform. This reverses the roles of mic and receiver. External shotgun mic into camera mic jack / camera headphone out cabled to camera mounted wireless mic / wireless mic transmits to operator worn receiver / headphones plugged into receiver. Now operator is wirelessly monitoring shotgun audio without being cabled to camera. From test others have done, looks like very acceptable latency.
@@DanChanPiano Interesting idea. The tiny Receiver unit that DJI provides has a headphone or audio out, With boom stands holding the two mics, you can remotely monitor both while filming. Highly recommend it. Each mic has 8GB of internal storage and can be used as a standalone recorder to add in post. I have several RODE Shotguns and almost went for the Go2, but after 5 DJI drones I figured I'd give it a shot. Glad I did. Keep up the good work!
@@4amcreationshhi Thanks! The two systems are in direct competition. GO2 also has internal recording and the receiver has two outs (usb-c and 3.5 jack). With either system, in a non-spontaneous situation where you can mic your subject or near proximity, I think I'd go internal recording with monitoring and use the camera mic for scratch, then synch in post. The reviews are giving physical size, range and battery brownie points to DJI over Rode. Good to hear your user experience. Oh yeah one more thing.. DJI is Chinese and Rode Australian, but that gets into ideals, loyalty and politics, not function and value. Of course I'd rather buy American but we need to compete.
Hello. May I ask you please what settings would you use to film a musical in theater. I just bought a second hand ax53 and I have to film a show in 2 days, and I dont have time to learn all details and I don't want to mess eveything, as I will have only one chance !!!!!!!!
@@sebwca Try to get to the theater as early as possible to set up and test under stage lighting. I'm thinking you will be on a tripod at a distance far enough from the stage to get a full scene wide shot. I'm not sure if you plan to do camera movements or zooms. If on tripod, you probably want to turn "steady shot " off. PA system is most likely and on board mic will give you acceptable but not great audio. I would set the camera in full auto. A long press of the manual button gives you manual ring assignments. I set mine to "focus" in case auto focus misses. In that case you short press the manual button and turn the lens ring to correct. Go back to auto focus if there's no auto focus problem. In "camera/mic" menu settings, "My Button" allows you three assignable quick access functions when you touch the lcd screen. I assign mine to "grid" , "steady shot", and "AE Shift". I turn grid on and off to get the camera level, especially if there's a horizon in the shot that would give away an unlevel camera. Quick access to "steady shot" is good so you can turn it off when mounting to a tripod. I turn my zebras on 100% so I can see if my highlights are going to blow out. By having "AE shift" assigned, (it'll show up on LCD screen as "EV" ) I can quickly override auto exposure and reduce or increase as needed. Hope that helps and good luck.
Great video, thanks! I just got the camera but I have trouble connectiong it with mic ECM-B1M. It tells me its not compatible and somewhere online I found that I have to "Set the DIGITAL/ANALOG switch to “ANALOG”", but I cannot find the setting. Do you know how to help please? Thanks in advance!
we may look out dated but we have and get all the footage vs a iphone LOL i dont feel a shamed at still using a video camera i love them still i have used them from day one too now take care , great video and info on gear
Words of wisdom. In style or not, a camcorder is still the most capable single component video camera. Judging this book by its cover is short sighted. Glad you came away with something from the video.
How is the ECM-B1M for concerts in a theater? My son is a brass musician and I’m debating on buying the B1M instead of using the stock microphone. Thanks.
I've never used it in your situation, but I would think the ability to focus in on the horn section or go wide for the larger group would be a plus. If you went manual you could also adjust record input , watch the meter for clipping and get the right recording volume in a loud environment.
The link to Link to Peter Homer's Step-up Adapter and Lens Hood Video: is unusable, listed as private. How do you attach the ring adapter to the body? Thanks.
Yes, I see that the Peter Homer video gone. The step-up ring screws into the filter threads of the Ax53's lens. Here's a link to the ring I used. www.amazon.com/Step-Up-Filter-adapter-Camera-Metal/dp/B08HZ9N59J/ref=sr_1_6?crid=2A5Q6RAR4VI2A&keywords=amopofo%2B55mm%2B-%2B72mm%2Bstep-up%2Bring&qid=1700520567&sprefix=amopofo%2B55mm%2Bto%2B72mm%2Bstep%2Bup%2Bring%2Caps%2C153&sr=8-6&th=1
Thanks for sharing these great ideas! I've been a home movie geek since the '70s and, like you, prefer looking through an eyepiece for many shots. I'm buying the ax53 just to regain this feature 🎥 Using the eyepiece helps frame shots in the way viewers expect to enjoy content. It just makes the video more watchable. This conventional framing gets lost with the too-wide, spray-and-pray tendency of LCD-screen framing (and limited, jerky zoom) of SLR cameras.
Thanks for all info.I need some help,not sure if it is normal or faulty camera,its records internal fan like sound probably from internal gimbal,does your camera does that? or external mic sort out this problem?,thanks
I don't get any type of fan like noise from my internal mic. or when I plug in an external. You could try to troubleshoot by plugging in an external to see if there's any difference. If it's still under warranty you might write Sony and report the issue. On another issue, but also microphone related, is the latency of you will hear on this camera when listening to live headphone audio while recording.The delay is substantial. It's tolerable if I'm not recording myself talking, but when I do, the delay is so distracting I stumble and can't speak normally and have to remove the headphones.
excellent review! I am considering this camera for plane spotting, however, I need to shoot vertically (reel mode) not sure if that can be achieve with this camera? have you shoot vertically?
I have a question... I have the sony shotgun mic like the video, do I still have to put the furry wind mic protector on the actual camera too or once I put the shotgun mic, the mic from the camera won't work?
When Sony proprietary mics are plugged into the camera's multi interface shoe, the internal camera mic is disabled. The wind muff over the actual camera's mic grill is for when no external mic is plugged in. There are times when I use the camera "as is", and the taped on muff helps quite a bit on a breezy day.
I Have the AX53 from around 2 years but I miss so much that is impossibile to put an external monitor if I record in Full 4K... Waiting for a new model but I think Sony is more interested to push people to buy mirrorless system and is no more interested in semipro camcorder. Thats's why I think that my next camcorder will be Panasonic HX-1500/2000 that offer 4K 60. As Sony specialist what do you think? I used for around 1 years a AX700 also but tecnology is really old now and is really difficult to have a fluid 4K with just 30 fps and a stabilation much less optimized that AX53 with his internal gimball. AX700 offer also log file but only with a 8 bit file.
Panasonic HX-1500/2000 have noise in low light..The best for you is to bring the Panasonic X20 who i can say is a sony a7 iii in a cam version.Just wait to have her in Black Friday or some other sale offer.
Awesome video! SO so helpful. Unfortunately the Waka 72mm Lens Hood is no longer available, and I'm struggling to find "snap on" lens hoods that could be used in its place. do you have any other recommendations?
Glad you liked the video and thanks. Sorry, no recommendations. I searched, as I'm sure you did, and the all-in-one flower style lens hood that reverses with the little ball bearings with included cap could not be found from other manufacturers. You're most likely going to have to buy the hood and cap separately and hope that it reverses easily.
Great video! I use this camera to record horse racing but my videos always look fuzzy and soft. The horses always lack detail. In your video, you recorded motor cross…… any sides what setting you used? I always record in 1080p 60p and adjust my shutter speed 500-1500 depending on how bright it is outside. Everything else is in automatic. Do you have any suggestions?
In looking at your videos I think they look sharp and well recorded. I don't know if you used the AX53 for these, but I see no problem with detail at the settings you are using. In my video, when showing video of the motocross jumping, the video was shot on my Sony AX700. Since I was talking about the use of viewfinders and not the AX53, I felt it was ok to use footage shot with another camera.
@@DanChanPiano I know they could look sharper or I guess more focused because I have seen it done with this camera. I just can’t seem to find the correct settings with it. Would you recommend the nd filters for it? And yes, I use the ax53 for them.
You may be aware of the 180 degree rule to give realistic motion blur to moving subjects. A shutter speed that's very much faster than the video's frame rate setting produces a strobe effect such as intentionally used in the movie "Saving Private Ryan". The rule is the shutter speed should be twice the frame rate to get proper motion blur. So video shot in 30p should get a shutter speed of 60fps and 60p video should get a shutter speed of 120fps. Since the AX53 is limited to only one manual setting at a time with the other exposure values fully automatic, in bright sun one can use an ND filter to get the correct frame rate/shutter speed ratio. This is the primary reason to use an ND filter on the AX53. Whether or not it will make a difference in the sharpness you seek remains for you to test. @@capoeirask8
Hello Guys. Quick question : I just bought a AX53, and I have to film a musical in a theater in two days. So not enough time to learn all details. What settings would you recommand me not to mess everything ? Already bought a 128go 200mb/s sandisk extrem sd card and a 3300mah battery. Thx a lot !
Try to get to the theater as early as possible to set up and run some tests under stage lighting. I'm assuming you'll be on a tripod far enough back to get a full wide shot, so turn steady shot off. I don't know if you are planning a wide shot for the whole show or planning to do camera movements and zooming. I'm assuming they'll have a PA system so the onboard mic should do a sufficient but not great job. I'd leave the camera set to full auto. If you long press the manual button you can assign the front ring to various functions. I set mine to “focus”, In case I need to correct autofocus errors quickly. While filming, short press the manual button to get into that function. Set up “my buttons” to quickly access three commonly used functions of your choice by touching the LCD screen. , To get there- Menu / camera-mic / my buttons. I set mine to grid, steadyshot on or off and AE shift. Grid helps me level the camera when a horizon is in the shot where an unlevel camera is obvious. Steady shot on and off for a quick "off" setup if you're putting the camera on a tripod. I turn my zebras on 100% to see if highlights are blown out. If they are, I hit AE shift, (“EV” on screen) to correct auto exposure. Hope this helps and good luck.
Very practical suggestions Dan. I am planning to do exactly what you have suggested. One small doubt though. Is the Variable ND filter really necessary? Are the built in ND filters useless?
Thank you Suresh. There are no built in ND filters on the AX53. I attach the accessory variable ND filter in bright sun when I want a manual open aperture for shallow depth of field or to cut light to follow the 180 rule with fast moving subjects. For example bringing the shutter speed down to 1/60 @ 30p so that the rotor of a helicopter or the fluttering wings of a bird don’t look stroboscopic. Special situations like those. You probably don’t need one for general shooting.
@@DanChanPiano Thanks a lot Dan. I am waiting for my AX53..due to arrive in a week. I've been using a SONY HDR-CX900E, which has built-in NDF filters that I rarely used, over the last 6 years...now decided to go the 4 K way. I'll certainly put in the variable NDF filter. Thanx once again.
@@MrSureshkumarkumar Pause the video at 12:41 to see the price and where I got the large eyecup. It is an OEM replacement for the AX700 and fits loosely on the AX53. I bought it because it was the largest eyecup I could find that comes close to fitting the AX53. Other aftermarket eyecups tend to be small and as mentioned in the video finding the correct size for the AX53 is pure guess work as none give size specifications. I bought a few inexpensive ones online just to physically try them on and both were too tight. The big one for the AX700 is expensive and a little too big, but I made it work with thick double sided tape. It's a compromise.
Dan great video on the AX53. Unfortunately I sold mine (for way too cheap (: ) because I could not stand the terribly small view finder. Since I wear progressive glasses it was so hard to shoot outdoor’s fast moving objects such as air shows. Wish I had kept it longer and tried the large eye cup or LCD hood mod. I did try the AX700 which had a much better viewfinder. Just was out of my range price wise.
Thank you Randy. Yes, AX53's viewfinder is like looking down a tube at the display. Nice footage on your channel. I tried progressive bifocals but they gave me low grade headaches and I had to replace them with the conventional type.
Hi Dan love this video and is the reason I got the ax53. Just had a question - when I installed the ecm b1m mic, every time I start the camera it says this accessory is not supported or something like that , is that correct ? Is it actually connected or not just wondering. Thanks Dan !
Thank you. I don't get this warning when connecting my b1m to my Sony camcorders. Plug headphones or earbuds into the Ax53 and attach the b1m. Switch the mic to analog as the AX53 does not support digital mode. Tap or rub the b1m to confirm it is the audio source. Watch the camera's VU meter as you're doing this as well. The cameras internal mic is inactive with b1m attached and will not produce sound when rubbed. Detach the b1m and the internal mic reactivates as the audio source. This is how you can tell which mic is active.
@@DanChanPiano thank you for the reply! Yes you are right the mic only works in analog mode not digital. I switched the b1m to analog and now it works no problem. Kinda bummed it doesn’t support digital input, but then again I’m no expert so not sure if it’s a big difference anyway between digital and analog modes? But yea in analog mode no issues at all.
Great video, thank you! I have had this camera since Oct 2019 and I use it primarily for our church. My husband is a pastor and he offers classes that we record for our online academy and we are using it for one of our church services. I use a Manfrotto tripod but would really like to have something with more flexibility to pan easier and was looking at the Magnus VT-3000 with the remote control. Do you have any suggestions for that? If my husband steps out from behind the pulpit and I have to use the wide angle button at the top sometimes it's jerky or I shake the camera. Thank you again, I will be ordering the lens covers as suggested in your video.
Sounds like the Manfrotto doesn't have a fluid head for smooth pans and that you are looking for a tripod with a fluid head. The Magnus seems decent enough if you are replacing the Manfrotto and I read a little about the zoom controller. It connects to cameras via LANC which the AX53 does not have. However Magnus says it comes with an adapter to connect to consumer cameras. The AX53 has a multi port jack that might facilitate that adapter but I can't know for sure. You might make sure before purchasing. An alternative might be to keep your setup and get a wireless Sony RMT 835 remote commander for about $20. I have a couple of them that came with my other Sony cameras. Works with the AX53's IR window at the front of the camera. I use it for jitter free start/stop and zooming without touching the camera. You do have to reach around and point the remote at the camera's front, but I can zoom while recording without getting it the frame.
Great info,, question: besides the viewfinder and display are there any other cons on the ax43 vs the ax53 you know of? Also what’s your opinion on the ax700 image stabilization, and 4K30p vs the 60p of the panhcx2000,, Thank you!
Thanks! When zoomed in, the AX53's contrast based auto-focus sometimes misses the subject if the background is brighter than the subject. I have my manual button set to focus function so I can quickly correct. AX700's stabilization is ok but not on par with the AX53's BOSS. AX700's image is better. Panasonic x2000's 60p is good at smoothing out faster pans and subject movement, but for filming when those situations are not happening, I use 30p for better low light and to match my other cameras in a 30fps timeline.
Hello thanks for this great information. My question is will the VILTORX® DC-70 II 7 Inch HD Support 4K Signal HDMI Input Output Camera Video Field Monitor for DSLR Camera Camcorder with Rechargeable F550 Battery. fit to the top of the camera
I'm glad the video was was informative for you. Judging from looking at a photo of the Viltrorx monitor, I would say yes it would fit the camera. The hot shoe on the Ax53 is recessed a bit to allow for the cover door to close flush to the body, which is confining to bigger hot shoed accessories to fit in. When open, the door lays horizontally to be out of the way, but some people, who always have something in the shoe, remove the door for esthetics. I do think any of these camera obstructions would clear the high standing shoe mount of this monitor. One ting to know is that the AX53 is mini HDMI out and would have to adapter cable (included) up to full size HDMI if the monitor requires it. Also, the flip out LCD screen partially covers the HDMI jack and the LCD needs to be flipped open for a cable to be plugged in.
Thanks Dan ,great video and very useful information,got my AX53 a few days ago with the Sony GP-VPT1 shooting grip/mini tripod which I thought would come in useful as it has remote zoom and on/off recording controls,also a photo button.Have not really used the AX53 much yet as I came down with the flu recently.Have only used it in the garden and internally but I like very much what I've seen. I have been using my Panasonic HC VXF990 for trip to Scotland recently and was very pleased with the video I took there,I think the Sony will give better hand held results Thanks again,will sub your channel.Alan 😎
Thanks Alan and I think you’ll enjoy your new equipment. I have the predecessor to the GP-VPT1 and I liked all the controls but disliked the sloppiness of the pivoting handle which could not be tightened and my camera flopped around quite a bit. Hopefully Sony has tighten that up to make it more positive with the newer model.
@@alanvanallen7762 The older version also had the same button with detents. However when clicked into the detents there was slop and movement if you wiggled the handle.
@@MuhammadKharismawan It uses the MI shoe interface, but the mic has to be put into analog mode for older cameras. So it works on all Sony MI cameras just not digitally on all. Neither my AX700 or AX53 receive the digital signal, but the ECN-B1M certainly works on them, getting the analog signal. Digital is probably cleaner. Sony's website lists which newer cameras are compatible for digital sound.
I have a Sony Ax-33 and was very happy with it, but with the hype of moving into a mirrorless camera I bought a Sony ZV E-10, but the problem is with zooming. I have a Tamron 18-300 mm lens, which is very good but can't have a smooth cinematic zoom in and out, like you can get on the handycam. Even after correcting the shake with the catalyst browse, the jerk of zooming in and out is visible. To use a gimbal for this I will have to buy a high capacity one and even that will not solve the problem, because I will have to balance for every zoom position, unless the lens is with internal zoom. I overcame all this by mounting AX-33 and ZV E-10 on a rig. ZV E-10 was on a small gimbal with Sigma 16mm F1.4 and the AX-33 parallel to it on a separate fixture on the same rig. The bottom of the rig was supported in a pocket which in turn was hung from my neck and shoulders and the weight could be comfortably carried by a small build person like me in my seventies . I have a surround microphone with an additional voice input which is delivered from my wireless microphone. The output from the surround microphone is connected to both the cameras through a splitter. The ZV E-10 provides sharp and high quality images with bokeh by using your steps to move in and out. The distant images images are cinematically zoomed in and out on AX-33. I normally leave both the cameras on but one can save the battery and memory on SD card by switching of the unnecessary camera. The footages can be easily synched using the common audio on any editing software. The footages could be chopped and joined to ones liking. I found the results were really excellent.
You seem to have found an all in one solution. That sounds like quite the rig. I've seen UA-cam videos where people are doing side by side comparisons of cameras with such a rig but never anyone in public with a two camera setup. You must turn some heads. With both cameras running and getting two focal length perspectives it would almost be like getting the footage of two cameramen.
Glide cam for sure because any size/shape camera can be mounted atop the platform unobstructed. Gimbals are designed for the shallow depth of a mirrorless or DSLR. Camcorders are long. The roll motor arm would have to clear the viewfinder of a camcorder to give full articulation. It can be done with the right camcorder/gimbal combination.
You'll have to do your own research, but I found a Raynox lens that might work. Raynox HDP-2800ES High Definition 0.28x Diagonal Fisheye Conversion Lens. The thread mounts of the AX53 are 55mm and this lens has 43mm threads. When looking for attachment lenses, you'll take those two factors into consideration to see what type of step up or step down ring would be required if the lens does not match the 55mm threads of the AX53. I found it on Amazon, but can be bought elsewhere. Raynox might have other choices, but I cannot say for sure if you'll find compatibility.
I shoot my interviews with a BMPCC4K but I need a run and gun camera that I can just pull out and hit record for some upcoming documentary filming. These docs will have festival runs and hopefully(fingers crossed) get picked up for distribution. Can my AX53 handle that or do I need to get a XA50, or HC-X1500, or an AX700 or similar?
AX53 might be able to handle it, but if you're already familiar with the camera, you know it's limitations and the question might be, are you able to handle using the AX53's for your intended shots without frustration? I'd take it out in the field and do some testing of some of the scenarios you might encounter in the documentary stuff. AX53 is only a consumer camera after all.
Hi Dan! Would you use the ax53 to do videos such as this one (with background illuminated with light and yourself in big, kind of like a talking head)? What are you using at the moment to do those shots? My camera is not the best for this and looking to invest in a new one! Thank you for your help!
Ritch, I would say the AX53 would not be a great choice for on-camera presentation under lighting. Although studio lighting seems bright, it's a mere candle to the power of the sun, under which the small sensor of the AX53 shines. The AX53's manual exposure is limited to either iris, shutter speed or gain, one at a time making exposing difficult. BOSS, one of the strong points of the camera, isn't in use on a tripod. I'm using Sony AX700 for my studio work. You want a 1" sensor to handle the lower light and full manual exposure control. Look for a camera with those attributes.
I like the AX-53 but have not gotten good stabilization out of it. Even with the "Active" mode enabled, it still is very touchy. Did I have a bad one? Dont know but its not very good for stabilization. Also, if you are on your kayak, get a GoPro. much cheaper and waterproof.
When looking at the lens, does it float as demonstrated at 2:00 in the video? If not, there is a problem. If it does, then BOSS is engaged and you're getting the best stabilization the camera offers. You must still make a conscious effort to hold the camera as steady as possible. It will not fully compensate for gross shaking or jerky movements. If you were to record, holding the AX53 and any other non-BOSS, but OIS camera, mounted together side by side, I think the comparison would definitely favor BOSS. Regarding video while kayaking, have a look at my video, "Calm Water Kayaking", ua-cam.com/video/x_6qlwGznp4/v-deo.html Here I demonstrate my use of GoPros along with the AX53. GoPros have their place for wide angle shots, but you must have the ability to zoom with a video camera to get the varied types of shots I need while on the water.
It would work but due to it's small sensor it might not be the best for indoors, even bright stage lighting. Auto focus has more problems in low light too. It performs best outdoors where the sun is 20 times brighter than indoors. If you aren't too critical about noise in the picture from the gain being pumped up and on a budget it would work. I think you'd be happier spending more and getting a camera with 1" sensor and an external microphone that would better handle the low light and have a better reach for the audio (depends on PA system of no PA system). Sony AX700 perhaps.
I am happy with this camera, but coming from the XR500VE, I didn't appreciate the tiny LCD display, or the placement of the HDMI port blocking the display from being closed. Seems like they deliberately made things awkward. Thankfully, it takes great video and pictures.
"Seems like they deliberately made things awkward." Who knows what evil lurks in the minds of camera manufacturers? Planned obsolescence, missing features that just happen to be included on the next model up with upgrades that we just can't live without. $$$$$$ Marketing and engineering work hand in hand for companies to keep selling and make profit. It's the way of business. It's the way of the world. We as consumers need to keep on being consumers and there's no use fretting about it. At least that's what I try to tell myself when I get a case of buyer's regret. I've found that with most consumer products, I need to resist the temptation to immediately upgrade. If you wait for a few versions to come out, you'll usually see the features you want and maybe even a price break. At some point, you have to bite but just know there will always be something bigger and better on the horizon.
@@DanChanPiano Just to confirm, that I meant to say the font size on the display is "tiny". I do have glasses, but only for reading labels, and I refuse to put them on to see the display info. Sony upset me further by trying to mislead me into thinking I would need a new remote control. I wanted to know if the remote from the XR500VE would still work with the AX53, and they kept saying "it is not compatible". The remote works PERFECTLY (every button). I was wise to wait and find out. I don't expect to get lied to when I call these companies, but sadly it seems to be normal now.
I just ordered the AX-53 and I currently have the PJ790V also.. lol I only use camcorders for its nightshot ability. I was wondering do you feel both are comparable when it comes to nightvision 4k vs 1080p? I feel camcorders do have a learning curb especially with the settings ISO vs gain…… I had to learn it to get the most out of nightvision. Also do you feel there’s a difference in the f2.0 vs f1.8?
I haven't used the nightshot feature on the AX53 and only used nightshot on the PJ790 a few times., so I can't answer that question. Sensor sizes of the two at 1/2.5 and 1/2.8 are very close, as are the f2.0 and f1.8 lens speeds so I see little difference. I shoot the pj790 at 1080 60p which the ax53 is also capable of but only 30p in 4k. I noticed some of your videos are in 4k so you already know the res improvements you'll be getting with the ax53 in 4k, but I find I need to pay attention to fast camera and subject movement with the slower 4k frame rate. You'll enjoy the added features and controls of the ax53. Focus peaking, exposure aids like zebras and the camera is a little lighter than the 790. You'll like the much greater zoom range. My main frustration with the 53 is with zoomed in auto focusing in less that optimal light. I have manual focus assigned to the manual button so I can quickly correct when auto focus fails.
@@DanChanPiano do you have issues with autofocus in low light without being zoomed in with the AX-53? I’m not going to be using the zoom feature to much and if so, only for short throws nothing crazy.
@@thecoloradotravelers7212 Yes, only when zoomed in and especially if the background is brighter or more contrasty than the subject. Auto focus in WA is fine in lower light. Frustrating for me because I'll miss the shot of fleeting subjects such as birds by having to fiddle with the focus.
For me the AX53 is better because it has the articulating electronic viewfinder. On the later model AX43, Sony eliminated the viewfinder altogether. AX43 also has fewer buttons, meaning you would have to get to those functions through the menu. Other than that, I think the cameras are the same. Ax43 is a little cheaper because of the reduced features. The main disappointment when the AX 43 came out was that the camera didn't change enough from the AX53. We were hoping for 4K@60, but didn't happen. Also we wanted more manual controls. Didn't happen. Depending on your needs, the newer AX43 might be fine for you but, those are the differences.
Thank you. I was leaning towards the 700 but my tricking out video here sold me on the sx53. Better price for myself. But I do love the features of the 700. Thx for the reply. Good to know about the stabilization.
The AX43 is essentially the same camera as the AX53 with these feature changes. AX43 has no viewfinder, no stereo microphone, no night shot infrared and the LCD screen is half the resolution of the AX53. If those features aren’t important to you, you could save the $200 with the AX43. The main complaint was the newer AX43 showed no improvements over the AX53. We were hoping Sony would add 4K@60P.
Nice video! I have waited years to upgrade AX53. It is sad that mirrorless lens money rapidhole ruins the camcorder markets. I would like to buy usb-c small camcorder. Seems Canon G70 is the only new USB-C camcorder. Sad it does not have IR like AX53 has. I would buy a new camcorder if someone would make those again.
Thanks Juha. Not much we can about what's available. Camera makers follow the money and what sells. Unfortunately camcorders are low on their profit scale.
We're really talking two different animals here. The FS7M2 is in a different league. Big, powerful and expensive with lenses vs small, somewhat limited and a lot less expensive. Portability in a camera is a huge factor for me. Buyer's remorse can cause serious depression. I've been there. Take care.
Hold on a sec... motion blur isn't due to FPS... it's due to shutter speed. If you shoot with 1/1000s shutter speed at 25fps - there'll be no motion blur. The video won't be silky-smooth like 60fps, but motion blur? None.
One big downside of this wonderful camcorder is that, like many camcorders, they are hardcoded PAL or NTSC. For me, as a European, our Ax53 or Ax43 are only recording 25p or 50p - no 30p, 24p or 60p... Unfortunately
thank you im a armature went to broadcasting school but never got a dagree, i bought this cam at my last ditch effort to create more an not give up my dreams on being creative iv been in bands and film projects all my life but once my 30s hit the higher end in life went to work work work, still working hard but this lil cam is going to be my only hope in producing one of the best lil rock oprea the worlds never seen. this video just put a lot of suger plums in my head.
this thing is my lil engine that can and will.
"I think I can. I think I can." Of course you can. You go Willey!
This video took me back to my childhood, the quality of video and video. Reminds me of a early 2000's documentary.
Well done!
most of us (like me) just get the thing working and some of us go 100% into the thing and take full advantage of all features. Well done for such an entertaining video with real technical content, you are such a great role model to mankind......God bless and keep on shooting.
Thanks Andy! Wow! "a great role model to mankind". As far as compliments go, I don't think that can be beat. I'll have to request that be put on my gravestone.
Yes I agree! I needed this.
Thank you 🫶🏽
I bought my ax53 in 2018 finally upgrading my sony dv camera from 2003. I love it but feel i do not use it enough. I love making home videos and family gatherings but it has been in its drawer since covid. thanks to your video, i think its time to break it out again and just start filming shots.
great content Dan, most appreciated, even if it is a couple of years old :)
With camcorders it takes years or even never for manufacturers to refresh to newer models. Very different from the camera market in general. If the video camera serves my purpose, I try not to think in terms of missing out on the latest and greatest.
My advice to anyone who used to play music or used shoot video or used to do something else is take that guitar, camera or exercise machine and sit it out right there in everyday plain sight. You'll pick it up and start fiddling with it. It tends to renew your interest and before long it becomes a routine and you'll advance from where you were before.
Thanks alot of this info was useful for the ax43. I literally bought exactly what you suggested. Thanks
Glad to help.
Great video Dan ❤
Very informative video , I decided to buy this camera as a beginner. Thank you!
This was remarkably helpful; especially the tip on using the step-up ring. Thanks, subscribed.
Been shooting with an FDR- AX33 since 2015. I know many of your suggestions, but have learned a few new ones in the process. I found a Mennon lens shade solved my gimbal/wide angel vignetting issues. The problem with a UV filter is the occasional lens halo reflection that would appear in the recorded footage. I gave up on it to prevent the issue. I do use Mennon's white balance capable cap for protection when not shooting. As a fellow YTer I made sure to give you a "like" and watched the entire video. Plus I made sure to comment. We can all use the points that YT attributes to these. I do a lot of run and gun so BOSS in vital for me. I wish theey could add it to a camera like the 700.
Thanks Chris. I can see how the big Mennon rectangular shade would be out far enough to not vignette and the white balance cap is a cool feature. You and I both wish the AX700 had BOSS. It would be the "perfect camcorder".
@@DanChanPiano I've watched several YT videos on mounting the 700 on a gimbal. It is tedious and the combined rig is cumbersome. Love all its features ,but it is not a run and gun camcorder in my opinion.
@@chrislauterbach8856 By comparison to AX33 / AX53 the AX700 is a fairly large and at 2 lbs, hefty camcorder. I wouldn't consider it a good gimble candidate. Even if it had BOSS, I don't consider BOSS a gimble. BOSS shines by eliminating the micro jitters handholding static shots. It smooths and stabilizes small camera moves such as push ins and lateral trucking. Walking or running with BOSS does not give gimble like results. I have a Feyutech Scorp mini on order and I'm really hoping I can fly the AX53 on it. Kind of an unresearched impulse buy as the gimble is designed for small mirrorless, phones and action cameras. The length of a camcorder is never in the compatibility specs. If it mounts, I'll be a happy guy.
Excellent video! Really liked the tip about using the tripod bag for spontaneous stability.
I love getting viewer feedback like this. Thanks for letting me know.
Great video, profesionally served and a good ammount McGyverness in it.
Great suggestions, Dan! Very helpful to beginners and "old pros" as well!
Wow how come the image coming out of this old camcorder looks nicer than the videos out of my brand new Sony A7Cii from 2024?
This video was shot with a variety of cameras, but I did shoot the opening titled clips with the AX53. I presume you are liking those better than your full frame camera. Much more light gathering resulting in less noise in a full frame sensor compared to the tiny 1/2.5" sensor in the AX 53. It could be that there's more going on than sensor size alone. But if the end result is you liking what you see, who cares about the technical stuff.
Great video and lots of useful information. Thank you very much!
Great video! Thanks for all your efforts
Hi,
Great video. I have set the stabilisation to Active for 4K@25fps on my AX53. However, as soon as I remove the battery, it goes back to Standard. Is this normal behaviour? I would prefer it stayed as Active since I only shoot in 4K.
My camera retains all user settings after battery changes. I shoot the AX53 in 4k@30fps. For a test and reference, give that setting a go and see if you get the return to default. This would be telling. At least you would know it's a condition of your res/fps setting. If you're stuck with having to change back each time , you could look at it on the positive side. A quick check of all settings before shooting prevents errors. BTW I enjoyed your channel.
Thanks. I was already in XAVC S 4K@25fps but just tried re-setting to XAVC S 4K@25fps by:
File Format>XAVC S 4K> OK..executing...and it seems to stick on Active now, even when removing the battery! Here's to hoping the setting sticks with a longer battery removal.
Not quite sure what's caused this. I may have as you suggest unknowingly had some other setting changed or Mode, that prevented retention of the Active Stabilisation.
Once again, thanks for your video.@@DanChanPiano
I own a JVC GYMH 170 and many DSLR but I'm looking for a SONY AX53 because I record a lot of CONCERTS. I want more zoom and clearity than my JVC provides. Thanks DAN by your AMAZING video!! Congrats.
As an owner of a AX53, Great video! Thanks for the work and for those great tips!
You’re very welcome Jorge . I’m glad you found it helpful.
It would be nice to have a similar video on the FDR-AX700 camera, please.
This was great. Keep up the good work
Many thanks!
thank you for your work! its very useful
Excellent video! Thank you for sharing all of your tips and information. I have all of your camcorder videos saved and continually utilize them as valuable references. If they were books, they would be worn out! I'm hoping you will publish additional photography/videography videos in the future. It appears you are using a holster for your Sony AX53. Could you provide the manufacturer and model of it? Thanks!
Great to know the videos are appreciated and of value to people. Thanks for the encouragement. I like the quick access and simplicity of holster cases designed for SLRs with telephoto lenses. They're very good when repurposed for small camcorders. The Tamarac case has long been discontinued. I also own a Lowepro TLZ2, also discontinued. You just have to buy what is available in a "holster camera case". Search that term on B&H and choices of top loading styles will result. In the specs will be the dimensions, so that you can get the size to fit your needs.
Great info. I use a step up myself to 72mm. My filters are a K&F UF filter, and then a K&F Variable filter 1-5 stop with 28 multi-layer coatings. Good stuff. saved this one.
Glad you liked it! I was not familiar with the K&F brand but upon searching, they seem to be an option I would consider in the future. They really have an extensive ND lineup. Thanks for mentioning them.
Great video & Thanks for sharing….I own a Sony AX53 myself and shoot Dragraces in 1080p@60fps….I want to shoot Dragraces in 4k@60fps but the AX53 can only do 30fps in 4k….So my question is “ How on earth did you manage to get your AX53 to shoot those action shots so smoothly & look more like 60fps than 30fps ? I really wanna shoot the NHRA FINALS in Pomona in 4k this November 2023 but I want it to look like 60fps as you accomplished in your fast shots of the racecar & motorcycle jumps. Thank you for your expertise 🙏🙏🔥🔥🔥👏👏👏
Thanks Frank. As you stated, the AX53's top 4K frame rate is 30fps. Not all footage in this video was shot with the AX53. I made sure to label the clips that were at the video's start to demo the camera's resolution, and I used AX53 shots for many of the clips but not all. The race cars is found video. I shot the slo mo motorcycle footage in 1080 @120fps on my AX700. When talking to subjects non specific to the AX53, like the use of viewfinders I never claimed what you were seeing was AX53 footage. So, I guess it was a bit misleading to those who thought everything was AX53. I see movie footage shot at 24fps where the camera is whipping around and subjects are moving quickly and the motion blur is minimal. That is a mystery to me. They say that the eyes and brain are used to seeing blur as you turn your head and then when you stop, the scene comes into focus. I started paying attention to pans in movies and television and yes, there is motion blur during the pan then sharp focus when the pan ends. So I guess it's true, just never analyzed until you pay it some attention. My Panasonic X2000 shoots 4K@60 and I can pan and shoot action much more to my liking than 30fps where I'm making a conscious effort to pan very slowly.
What a nice review. Brilliant.
I have owned camcorders in the past and they all had an internal CR2032 battery required to maintain power and store your settings eg date & time etc, when the main battery was removed.
Occasionally the CR2032 battery needed replacing and could be easily accessed behind a small cover and replaced with a new one.
However, with the Sony AX53, things are different. You have no access to the small built-in internal battery!
The internal battery on my AX53 seems to have come to the end of its life and so settings are no longer retained when you remove the external battery.
Anyone else have this problem on the AX53 and found a solution?
It seems like the ECM-B1M is not compatible in digital mode. Does this mean that it also requires an audio cable? Or is audio still passed the the interface?
The mic is powered and passes it’s signal through the hot shoe interface. It works with any Sony camera that has a multi interface shoe. There is nowhere to even plug in a cable. Later cameras are compatible to receive the microphone’s digital processing whereas all the other MI Sony cameras get an analog signal. Both signals sound good.
@@DanChanPiano thank you for sharing this information. I am very interested in getting an AX700 for its stabilization properties. My current cameras need post stabilization in Catalyst Prepare to look good.
Many thanks for sharing Dan. I saw a plate you attached at the bottom of the Sony FDR-AX53 but no description on it on the accessories list. Can you share how to get that plate (the name and type)?
You're welcome. The plate is a quick release plate from a Benro tripod. Tripod manufactures have standardized their quick release plates and there are two main types, Manfrotto 501 and arca-swiss. This one is the smaller arca swiss.
Many thanks 🙏@@DanChanPiano
Dan, can you include links to the accessories in the description? thanks
Great and very informative video.
Great video. Where is the link for the step up ring and filters? Thanks
Here's the step up ring
www.amazon.com/55-72MM-Step-Up-Adapter-Stepping-Infrared/dp/B087PQVW22/ref=sr_1_3?crid=18HZIEH0YAGCM&keywords=step+up+ring+adapter+55mm+to&qid=1677100159&s=electronics&sprefix=step+up+ring+adapter+55mm+to+%2Celectronics%2C139&sr=1-3
Exact lens hood doesn't seem to still be available but there are others, so you'll have to do your own research to find the 72mm lens hood. Copy and paste these words into your search and I'm sure you'll be able to come up with something.
72mm Reversible Tulip Flower Lens Hood Set, Unique Design Camera Lens Hood for Canon Nikon Sony DSLR + Center Pinch Lens Cap with Cap Keeper Leash + Microfiber Cleaning Cloth
Such a great video, thanks!
I own the FDR-AX53 and use it as a second and third cam for long run takes and live events. The DJI Wireless LAV system works as well as any shotgun mic, for about the same money. You get two mics, both that can record standalone with no receiver. If you edit in post, it's ideal IMO. Thanks for the info and time spent to share this info!
Thanks for commenting a valuable tip. It reminded me to continue researching DJI wireless vs Rode Go II, which I have in my shopping list. So far DJI is winning. I'm also interested in the wireless headphone monitoring hack that I'm sure both systems can perform. This reverses the roles of mic and receiver. External shotgun mic into camera mic jack / camera headphone out cabled to camera mounted wireless mic / wireless mic transmits to operator worn receiver / headphones plugged into receiver. Now operator is wirelessly monitoring shotgun audio without being cabled to camera. From test others have done, looks like very acceptable latency.
@@DanChanPiano Interesting idea. The tiny Receiver unit that DJI provides has a headphone or audio out, With boom stands holding the two mics, you can remotely monitor both while filming. Highly recommend it. Each mic has 8GB of internal storage and can be used as a standalone recorder to add in post. I have several RODE Shotguns and almost went for the Go2, but after 5 DJI drones I figured I'd give it a shot. Glad I did. Keep up the good work!
@@4amcreationshhi Thanks! The two systems are in direct competition. GO2 also has internal recording and the receiver has two outs (usb-c and 3.5 jack). With either system, in a non-spontaneous situation where you can mic your subject or near proximity, I think I'd go internal recording with monitoring and use the camera mic for scratch, then synch in post. The reviews are giving physical size, range and battery brownie points to DJI over Rode. Good to hear your user experience. Oh yeah one more thing.. DJI is Chinese and Rode Australian, but that gets into ideals, loyalty and politics, not function and value. Of course I'd rather buy American but we need to compete.
Hello. May I ask you please what settings would you use to film a musical in theater. I just bought a second hand ax53 and I have to film a show in 2 days, and I dont have time to learn all details and I don't want to mess eveything, as I will have only one chance !!!!!!!!
@@sebwca Try to get to the theater as early as possible to set up and test under stage lighting. I'm thinking you will be on a tripod at a distance far enough from the stage to get a full scene wide shot. I'm not sure if you plan to do camera movements or zooms. If on tripod, you probably want to turn "steady shot " off. PA system is most likely and on board mic will give you acceptable but not great audio. I would set the camera in full auto. A long press of the manual button gives you manual ring assignments. I set mine to "focus" in case auto focus misses. In that case you short press the manual button and turn the lens ring to correct. Go back to auto focus if there's no auto focus problem.
In "camera/mic" menu settings, "My Button" allows you three assignable quick access functions when you touch the lcd screen. I assign mine to "grid" , "steady shot", and "AE Shift". I turn grid on and off to get the camera level, especially if there's a horizon in the shot that would give away an unlevel camera. Quick access to "steady shot" is good so you can turn it off when mounting to a tripod. I turn my zebras on 100% so I can see if my highlights are going to blow out. By having "AE shift" assigned, (it'll show up on LCD screen as "EV" ) I can quickly override auto exposure and reduce or increase as needed. Hope that helps and good luck.
Excellent presentation again
Vielen Dank !
Great video, thanks! I just got the camera but I have trouble connectiong it with mic ECM-B1M. It tells me its not compatible and somewhere online I found that I have to "Set the DIGITAL/ANALOG switch to “ANALOG”", but I cannot find the setting. Do you know how to help please? Thanks in advance!
The Digital/Analog switch is on the top left corner of the back of the mic. It's across from the polar pickup pattern switch.
@@DanChanPiano ah cool! I didnt think of looking at the mic 😅🙌
we may look out dated but we have and get all the footage vs a iphone LOL
i dont feel a shamed at still using a video camera i love them still i have used them from day one too now
take care , great video and info on gear
Words of wisdom. In style or not, a camcorder is still the most capable single component video camera. Judging this book by its cover is short sighted. Glad you came away with something from the video.
How is the ECM-B1M for concerts in a theater? My son is a brass musician and I’m debating on buying the B1M instead of using the stock microphone. Thanks.
I've never used it in your situation, but I would think the ability to focus in on the horn section or go wide for the larger group would be a plus. If you went manual you could also adjust record input , watch the meter for clipping and get the right recording volume in a loud environment.
The link to Link to Peter Homer's Step-up Adapter and Lens Hood Video: is unusable, listed as private. How do you attach the ring adapter to the body? Thanks.
Yes, I see that the Peter Homer video gone. The step-up ring screws into the filter threads of the Ax53's lens. Here's a link to the ring I used. www.amazon.com/Step-Up-Filter-adapter-Camera-Metal/dp/B08HZ9N59J/ref=sr_1_6?crid=2A5Q6RAR4VI2A&keywords=amopofo%2B55mm%2B-%2B72mm%2Bstep-up%2Bring&qid=1700520567&sprefix=amopofo%2B55mm%2Bto%2B72mm%2Bstep%2Bup%2Bring%2Caps%2C153&sr=8-6&th=1
Thanks for sharing these great ideas! I've been a home movie geek since the '70s and, like you, prefer looking through an eyepiece for many shots. I'm buying the ax53 just to regain this feature 🎥
Using the eyepiece helps frame shots in the way viewers expect to enjoy content. It just makes the video more watchable. This conventional framing gets lost with the too-wide, spray-and-pray tendency of LCD-screen framing (and limited, jerky zoom) of SLR cameras.
I appreciate you commenting and glad you might have benefited.
Thanks for all info.I need some help,not sure if it is normal or faulty camera,its records internal fan like sound probably from internal gimbal,does your camera does that? or external mic sort out this problem?,thanks
I don't get any type of fan like noise from my internal mic. or when I plug in an external. You could try to troubleshoot by plugging in an external to see if there's any difference. If it's still under warranty you might write Sony and report the issue.
On another issue, but also microphone related, is the latency of you will hear on this camera when listening to live headphone audio while recording.The delay is substantial. It's tolerable if I'm not recording myself talking, but when I do, the delay is so distracting I stumble and can't speak normally and have to remove the headphones.
@@DanChanPiano thanks for quick response.Will send it back.Just bought it.Will try ax43 😀
A circular polarizer helps outdoors too. 👍
excellent review! I am considering this camera for plane spotting, however, I need to shoot vertically (reel mode) not sure if that can be achieve with this camera?
have you shoot vertically?
when and where to use this kind of camera?
I'm gonna order a filter protector so I can stop worrying about my ax53. thanks
I have a question... I have the sony shotgun mic like the video, do I still have to put the furry wind mic protector on the actual camera too or once I put the shotgun mic, the mic from the camera won't work?
When Sony proprietary mics are plugged into the camera's multi interface shoe, the internal camera mic is disabled. The wind muff over the actual camera's mic grill is for when no external mic is plugged in. There are times when I use the camera "as is", and the taped on muff helps quite a bit on a breezy day.
I Have the AX53 from around 2 years but I miss so much that is impossibile to put an external monitor if I record in Full 4K... Waiting for a new model but I think Sony is more interested to push people to buy mirrorless system and is no more interested in semipro camcorder. Thats's why I think that my next camcorder will be Panasonic HX-1500/2000 that offer 4K 60. As Sony specialist what do you think? I used for around 1 years a AX700 also but tecnology is really old now and is really difficult to have a fluid 4K with just 30 fps and a stabilation much less optimized that AX53 with his internal gimball. AX700 offer also log file but only with a 8 bit file.
Panasonic HX-1500/2000 have noise in low light..The best for you is to bring the Panasonic X20 who i can say is a sony a7 iii in a cam version.Just wait to have her in Black Friday or some other sale offer.
Hey, how are you, could you help me here, im not finding any patches for the microphone
Patches? Not sure what you mean.
Awesome video!
Awesome video! SO so helpful. Unfortunately the Waka 72mm Lens Hood is no longer available, and I'm struggling to find "snap on" lens hoods that could be used in its place. do you have any other recommendations?
Glad you liked the video and thanks. Sorry, no recommendations. I searched, as I'm sure you did, and the all-in-one flower style lens hood that reverses with the little ball bearings with included cap could not be found from other manufacturers. You're most likely going to have to buy the hood and cap separately and hope that it reverses easily.
Great video! I use this camera to record horse racing but my videos always look fuzzy and soft. The horses always lack detail. In your video, you recorded motor cross…… any sides what setting you used? I always record in 1080p 60p and adjust my shutter speed 500-1500 depending on how bright it is outside. Everything else is in automatic. Do you have any suggestions?
In looking at your videos I think they look sharp and well recorded. I don't know if you used the AX53 for these, but I see no problem with detail at the settings you are using. In my video, when showing video of the motocross jumping, the video was shot on my Sony AX700. Since I was talking about the use of viewfinders and not the AX53, I felt it was ok to use footage shot with another camera.
@@DanChanPiano I know they could look sharper or I guess more focused because I have seen it done with this camera. I just can’t seem to find the correct settings with it. Would you recommend the nd filters for it? And yes, I use the ax53 for them.
You may be aware of the 180 degree rule to give realistic motion blur to moving subjects. A shutter speed that's very much faster than the video's frame rate setting produces a strobe effect such as intentionally used in the movie "Saving Private Ryan". The rule is the shutter speed should be twice the frame rate to get proper motion blur. So video shot in 30p should get a shutter speed of 60fps and 60p video should get a shutter speed of 120fps. Since the AX53 is limited to only one manual setting at a time with the other exposure values fully automatic, in bright sun one can use an ND filter to get the correct frame rate/shutter speed ratio. This is the primary reason to use an ND filter on the AX53. Whether or not it will make a difference in the sharpness you seek remains for you to test. @@capoeirask8
Hello Guys. Quick question : I just bought a AX53, and I have to film a musical in a theater in two days. So not enough time to learn all details. What settings would you recommand me not to mess everything ? Already bought a 128go 200mb/s sandisk extrem sd card and a 3300mah battery. Thx a lot !
Try to get to the theater as early as possible to set up and run some tests under stage lighting. I'm assuming you'll be on a tripod far enough back to get a full wide shot, so turn steady shot off. I don't know if you are planning a wide shot for the whole show or planning to do camera movements and zooming. I'm assuming they'll have a PA system so the onboard mic should do a sufficient but not great job. I'd leave the camera set to full auto. If you long press the manual button you can assign the front ring to various functions. I set mine to “focus”, In case I need to correct autofocus errors quickly. While filming, short press the manual button to get into that function.
Set up “my buttons” to quickly access three commonly used functions of your choice by touching the LCD screen. , To get there- Menu / camera-mic / my buttons. I set mine to grid, steadyshot on or off and AE shift. Grid helps me level the camera when a horizon is in the shot where an unlevel camera is obvious. Steady shot on and off for a quick "off" setup if you're putting the camera on a tripod. I turn my zebras on 100% to see if highlights are blown out. If they are, I hit AE shift, (“EV” on screen) to correct auto exposure. Hope this helps and good luck.
What did you use to record the video like the inside your studio stuff it looks so clear
Sony AX-700.
Very practical suggestions Dan. I am planning to do exactly what you have suggested. One small doubt though. Is the Variable ND filter really necessary? Are the built in ND filters useless?
Thank you Suresh. There are no built in ND filters on the AX53. I attach the accessory variable ND filter in bright sun when I want a manual open aperture for shallow depth of field or to cut light to follow the 180 rule with fast moving subjects. For example bringing the shutter speed down to 1/60 @ 30p so that the rotor of a helicopter or the fluttering wings of a bird don’t look stroboscopic. Special situations like those. You probably don’t need one for general shooting.
@@DanChanPiano Thanks a lot Dan. I am waiting for my AX53..due to arrive in a week. I've been using a SONY HDR-CX900E, which has built-in NDF filters that I rarely used, over the last 6 years...now decided to go the 4 K way. I'll certainly put in the variable NDF filter. Thanx once again.
Can you tell me details of the large eye cap that suits the AX53? Thanx in advance
@@MrSureshkumarkumar Pause the video at 12:41 to see the price and where I got the large eyecup. It is an OEM replacement for the AX700 and fits loosely on the AX53. I bought it because it was the largest eyecup I could find that comes close to fitting the AX53. Other aftermarket eyecups tend to be small and as mentioned in the video finding the correct size for the AX53 is pure guess work as none give size specifications. I bought a few inexpensive ones online just to physically try them on and both were too tight. The big one for the AX700 is expensive and a little too big, but I made it work with thick double sided tape. It's a compromise.
Dan great video on the AX53. Unfortunately I sold mine (for way too cheap (: ) because I could not stand the terribly small view finder. Since I wear progressive glasses it was so hard to shoot outdoor’s fast moving objects such as air shows. Wish I had kept it longer and tried the large eye cup or LCD hood mod. I did try the AX700 which had a much better viewfinder. Just was out of my range price wise.
Thank you Randy. Yes, AX53's viewfinder is like looking down a tube at the display.
Nice footage on your channel.
I tried progressive bifocals but they gave me low grade headaches and I had to replace them with the conventional type.
@@DanChanPiano thanks Dan! Did you happen to read my comments in the video description for m Blue Angels video? lol
Well done. Thanks!
Hi Dan love this video and is the reason I got the ax53. Just had a question - when I installed the ecm b1m mic, every time I start the camera it says this accessory is not supported or something like that , is that correct ? Is it actually connected or not just wondering. Thanks Dan !
Thank you. I don't get this warning when connecting my b1m to my Sony camcorders. Plug headphones or earbuds into the Ax53 and attach the b1m. Switch the mic to analog as the AX53 does not support digital mode. Tap or rub the b1m to confirm it is the audio source. Watch the camera's VU meter as you're doing this as well. The cameras internal mic is inactive with b1m attached and will not produce sound when rubbed. Detach the b1m and the internal mic reactivates as the audio source. This is how you can tell which mic is active.
@@DanChanPiano thank you for the reply! Yes you are right the mic only works in analog mode not digital. I switched the b1m to analog and now it works no problem. Kinda bummed it doesn’t support digital input, but then again I’m no expert so not sure if it’s a big difference anyway between digital and analog modes? But yea in analog mode no issues at all.
Great video, thank you! I have had this camera since Oct 2019 and I use it primarily for our church. My husband is a pastor and he offers classes that we record for our online academy and we are using it for one of our church services. I use a Manfrotto tripod but would really like to have something with more flexibility to pan easier and was looking at the Magnus VT-3000 with the remote control. Do you have any suggestions for that? If my husband steps out from behind the pulpit and I have to use the wide angle button at the top sometimes it's jerky or I shake the camera. Thank you again, I will be ordering the lens covers as suggested in your video.
Sounds like the Manfrotto doesn't have a fluid head for smooth pans and that you are looking for a tripod with a fluid head. The Magnus seems decent enough if you are replacing the Manfrotto and I read a little about the zoom controller. It connects to cameras via LANC which the AX53 does not have. However Magnus says it comes with an adapter to connect to consumer cameras. The AX53 has a multi port jack that might facilitate that adapter but I can't know for sure. You might make sure before purchasing.
An alternative might be to keep your setup and get a wireless Sony RMT 835 remote commander for about $20. I have a couple of them that came with my other Sony cameras. Works with the AX53's IR window at the front of the camera. I use it for jitter free start/stop and zooming without touching the camera. You do have to reach around and point the remote at the camera's front, but I can zoom while recording without getting it the frame.
@@DanChanPiano thank you. I will look into the RMT 835. Never heard of it. thanks again.
Great info,, question: besides the viewfinder and display are there any other cons on the ax43 vs the ax53 you know of? Also what’s your opinion on the ax700 image stabilization, and 4K30p vs the 60p of the panhcx2000,, Thank you!
Thanks! When zoomed in, the AX53's contrast based auto-focus sometimes misses the subject if the background is brighter than the subject. I have my manual button set to focus function so I can quickly correct.
AX700's stabilization is ok but not on par with the AX53's BOSS. AX700's image is better.
Panasonic x2000's 60p is good at smoothing out faster pans and subject movement, but for filming when those situations are not happening, I use 30p for better low light and to match my other cameras in a 30fps timeline.
Hello thanks for this great information. My question is will the VILTORX® DC-70 II 7 Inch HD Support 4K Signal HDMI Input Output Camera Video Field Monitor for DSLR Camera Camcorder with Rechargeable F550 Battery. fit to the top of the camera
I'm glad the video was was informative for you. Judging from looking at a photo of the Viltrorx monitor, I would say yes it would fit the camera. The hot shoe on the Ax53 is recessed a bit to allow for the cover door to close flush to the body, which is confining to bigger hot shoed accessories to fit in. When open, the door lays horizontally to be out of the way, but some people, who always have something in the shoe, remove the door for esthetics. I do think any of these camera obstructions would clear the high standing shoe mount of this monitor. One ting to know is that the AX53 is mini HDMI out and would have to adapter cable (included) up to full size HDMI if the monitor requires it. Also, the flip out LCD screen partially covers the HDMI jack and the LCD needs to be flipped open for a cable to be plugged in.
@@DanChanPiano many thanks Dan for your quick response your advice was very valuable for me
Thanks Dan ,great video and very useful information,got my AX53 a few days ago with the Sony GP-VPT1 shooting grip/mini tripod which I thought would come in useful as it has remote zoom and on/off recording controls,also a photo button.Have not really used the AX53 much yet as I came down with the flu recently.Have only used it in the garden and internally but I like very much what I've seen.
I have been using my Panasonic HC VXF990 for trip to Scotland recently and was very pleased with the video I took there,I think the Sony will give better hand held results
Thanks again,will sub your channel.Alan 😎
Thanks Alan and I think you’ll enjoy your new equipment. I have the predecessor to the GP-VPT1 and I liked all the controls but disliked the sloppiness of the pivoting handle which could not be tightened and my camera flopped around quite a bit. Hopefully Sony has tighten that up to make it more positive with the newer model.
Yes Dan there is now a button which you press to move the grip so it locks into different positions of your choice,there is no chance of it moving
@@alanvanallen7762 The older version also had the same button with detents. However when clicked into the detents there was slop and movement if you wiggled the handle.
wait the ecm b1m support such an old camera? is it using Sony Mi hotshoe?
@@MuhammadKharismawan It uses the MI shoe interface, but the mic has to be put into analog mode for older cameras. So it works on all Sony MI cameras just not digitally on all. Neither my AX700 or AX53 receive the digital signal, but the ECN-B1M certainly works on them, getting the analog signal. Digital is probably cleaner. Sony's website lists which newer cameras are compatible for digital sound.
Is ECM D1...does it support stereo recording?
ECM-B1M is monophonic.
I have a Sony Ax-33 and was very happy with it, but with the hype of moving into a mirrorless camera I bought a Sony ZV E-10, but the problem is with zooming. I have a Tamron 18-300 mm lens, which is very good but can't have a smooth cinematic zoom in and out, like you can get on the handycam. Even after correcting the shake with the catalyst browse, the jerk of zooming in and out is visible. To use a gimbal for this I will have to buy a high capacity one and even that will not solve the problem, because I will have to balance for every zoom position, unless the lens is with internal zoom. I overcame all this by mounting AX-33 and ZV E-10 on a rig. ZV E-10 was on a small gimbal with Sigma 16mm F1.4 and the AX-33 parallel to it on a separate fixture on the same rig. The bottom of the rig was supported in a pocket which in turn was hung from my neck and shoulders and the weight could be comfortably carried by a small build person like me in my seventies . I have a surround microphone with an additional voice input which is delivered from my wireless microphone. The output from the surround microphone is connected to both the cameras through a splitter. The ZV E-10 provides sharp and high quality images with bokeh by using your steps to move in and out. The distant images images are cinematically zoomed in and out on AX-33. I normally leave both the cameras on but one can save the battery and memory on SD card by switching of the unnecessary camera. The footages can be easily synched using the common audio on any editing software. The footages could be chopped and joined to ones liking. I found the results were really excellent.
You seem to have found an all in one solution. That sounds like quite the rig. I've seen UA-cam videos where people are doing side by side comparisons of cameras with such a rig but never anyone in public with a two camera setup. You must turn some heads. With both cameras running and getting two focal length perspectives it would almost be like getting the footage of two cameramen.
Hi all, is it true that the ax53 can only do 1080p to external capture card via HDMI ?
(Was planing to use it for 4k live stream)
I don't know. Here's a link to the manual. www.sony.com/electronics/support/memory-camcorders-fdr-ax-series/fdr-ax53/manuals
Can the ax53 be used with a gimbal or glide cam?
Glide cam for sure because any size/shape camera can be mounted atop the platform unobstructed. Gimbals are designed for the shallow depth of a mirrorless or DSLR. Camcorders are long. The roll motor arm would have to clear the viewfinder of a camcorder to give full articulation. It can be done with the right camcorder/gimbal combination.
Do you know where to get a fisheye for this camera and how many millimeters will it be
You'll have to do your own research, but I found a Raynox lens that might work. Raynox HDP-2800ES High Definition 0.28x Diagonal Fisheye Conversion Lens. The thread mounts of the AX53 are 55mm and this lens has 43mm threads. When looking for attachment lenses, you'll take those two factors into consideration to see what type of step up or step down ring would be required if the lens does not match the 55mm threads of the AX53. I found it on Amazon, but can be bought elsewhere. Raynox might have other choices, but I cannot say for sure if you'll find compatibility.
I shoot my interviews with a BMPCC4K but I need a run and gun camera that I can just pull out and hit record for some upcoming documentary filming.
These docs will have festival runs and hopefully(fingers crossed) get picked up for distribution. Can my AX53 handle that or do I need to get a XA50, or HC-X1500, or an AX700 or similar?
AX53 might be able to handle it, but if you're already familiar with the camera, you know it's limitations and the question might be, are you able to handle using the AX53's for your intended shots without frustration? I'd take it out in the field and do some testing of some of the scenarios you might encounter in the documentary stuff. AX53 is only a consumer camera after all.
Hi Dan! Would you use the ax53 to do videos such as this one (with background illuminated with light and yourself in big, kind of like a talking head)?
What are you using at the moment to do those shots?
My camera is not the best for this and looking to invest in a new one!
Thank you for your help!
Ritch, I would say the AX53 would not be a great choice for on-camera presentation under lighting. Although studio lighting seems bright, it's a mere candle to the power of the sun, under which the small sensor of the AX53 shines. The AX53's manual exposure is limited to either iris, shutter speed or gain, one at a time making exposing difficult. BOSS, one of the strong points of the camera, isn't in use on a tripod. I'm using Sony AX700 for my studio work. You want a 1" sensor to handle the lower light and full manual exposure control. Look for a camera with those attributes.
Good video
Great content. I have sony ax100
I like the AX-53 but have not gotten good stabilization out of it. Even with the "Active" mode enabled, it still is very touchy. Did I have a bad one? Dont know but its not very good for stabilization. Also, if you are on your kayak, get a GoPro. much cheaper and waterproof.
When looking at the lens, does it float as demonstrated at 2:00 in the video? If not, there is a problem. If it does, then BOSS is engaged and you're getting the best stabilization the camera offers. You must still make a conscious effort to hold the camera as steady as possible. It will not fully compensate for gross shaking or jerky movements. If you were to record, holding the AX53 and any other non-BOSS, but OIS camera, mounted together side by side, I think the comparison would definitely favor BOSS.
Regarding video while kayaking, have a look at my video, "Calm Water Kayaking", ua-cam.com/video/x_6qlwGznp4/v-deo.html Here I demonstrate my use of GoPros along with the AX53. GoPros have their place for wide angle shots, but you must have the ability to zoom with a video camera to get the varied types of shots I need while on the water.
I need a camera to record stand up comedy shows.. really not much else. Is this a good choice? If not, what would you suggest?
Definitely just make sure you have proper lighting
It would work but due to it's small sensor it might not be the best for indoors, even bright stage lighting. Auto focus has more problems in low light too. It performs best outdoors where the sun is 20 times brighter than indoors. If you aren't too critical about noise in the picture from the gain being pumped up and on a budget it would work. I think you'd be happier spending more and getting a camera with 1" sensor and an external microphone that would better handle the low light and have a better reach for the audio (depends on PA system of no PA system). Sony AX700 perhaps.
From Argentine, Thank!!!!!!
I am happy with this camera, but coming from the XR500VE, I didn't appreciate the tiny LCD display, or the placement of the HDMI port blocking the display from being closed. Seems like they deliberately made things awkward. Thankfully, it takes great video and pictures.
"Seems like they deliberately made things awkward." Who knows what evil lurks in the minds of camera manufacturers? Planned obsolescence, missing features that just happen to be included on the next model up with upgrades that we just can't live without. $$$$$$ Marketing and engineering work hand in hand for companies to keep selling and make profit. It's the way of business. It's the way of the world. We as consumers need to keep on being consumers and there's no use fretting about it. At least that's what I try to tell myself when I get a case of buyer's regret. I've found that with most consumer products, I need to resist the temptation to immediately upgrade. If you wait for a few versions to come out, you'll usually see the features you want and maybe even a price break. At some point, you have to bite but just know there will always be something bigger and better on the horizon.
@@DanChanPiano Just to confirm, that I meant to say the font size on the display is "tiny". I do have glasses, but only for reading labels, and I refuse to put them on to see the display info. Sony upset me further by trying to mislead me into thinking I would need a new remote control. I wanted to know if the remote from the XR500VE would still work with the AX53, and they kept saying "it is not compatible". The remote works PERFECTLY (every button). I was wise to wait and find out. I don't expect to get lied to when I call these companies, but sadly it seems to be normal now.
When I get the money im totally doing this
Умеет ли снимать в slog?
I just ordered the AX-53 and I currently have the PJ790V also.. lol I only use camcorders for its nightshot ability. I was wondering do you feel both are comparable when it comes to nightvision 4k vs 1080p? I feel camcorders do have a learning curb especially with the settings ISO vs gain…… I had to learn it to get the most out of nightvision. Also do you feel there’s a difference in the f2.0 vs f1.8?
I haven't used the nightshot feature on the AX53 and only used nightshot on the PJ790 a few times., so I can't answer that question. Sensor sizes of the two at 1/2.5 and 1/2.8 are very close, as are the f2.0 and f1.8 lens speeds so I see little difference. I shoot the pj790 at 1080 60p which the ax53 is also capable of but only 30p in 4k. I noticed some of your videos are in 4k so you already know the res improvements you'll be getting with the ax53 in 4k, but I find I need to pay attention to fast camera and subject movement with the slower 4k frame rate. You'll enjoy the added features and controls of the ax53. Focus peaking, exposure aids like zebras and the camera is a little lighter than the 790. You'll like the much greater zoom range. My main frustration with the 53 is with zoomed in auto focusing in less that optimal light. I have manual focus assigned to the manual button so I can quickly correct when auto focus fails.
@@DanChanPiano do you have issues with autofocus in low light without being zoomed in with the AX-53? I’m not going to be using the zoom feature to much and if so, only for short throws nothing crazy.
@@thecoloradotravelers7212 Yes, only when zoomed in and especially if the background is brighter or more contrasty than the subject. Auto focus in WA is fine in lower light. Frustrating for me because I'll miss the shot of fleeting subjects such as birds by having to fiddle with the focus.
i’m going to put some stickers on my bmcc to trick it out
So the AX53 Is better than the AX43? With kind regards Daniel
For me the AX53 is better because it has the articulating electronic viewfinder. On the later model AX43, Sony eliminated the viewfinder altogether. AX43 also has fewer buttons, meaning you would have to get to those functions through the menu. Other than that, I think the cameras are the same. Ax43 is a little cheaper because of the reduced features. The main disappointment when the AX 43 came out was that the camera didn't change enough from the AX53. We were hoping for 4K@60, but didn't happen. Also we wanted more manual controls. Didn't happen. Depending on your needs, the newer AX43 might be fine for you but, those are the differences.
What is better. The sx53 or 700!?
Overall, 700 is better quality. The advantage of the 53 is it's smaller and has better stabilization.
Thank you. I was leaning towards the 700 but my tricking out video here sold me on the sx53. Better price for myself. But I do love the features of the 700.
Thx for the reply. Good to know about the stabilization.
Sorry FDR- AX53
whats so much worse with the ax43 than the ax53? since the ax53 is 200 dollars more expensive for me
The AX43 is essentially the same camera as the AX53 with these feature changes. AX43 has no viewfinder, no stereo microphone, no night shot infrared and the LCD screen is half the resolution of the AX53. If those features aren’t important to you, you could save the $200 with the AX43. The main complaint was the newer AX43 showed no improvements over the AX53. We were hoping Sony would add 4K@60P.
Thank you
You're welcome. I hope you got some useful information from the video.
That thumbnail tho>
Nice video! I have waited years to upgrade AX53. It is sad that mirrorless lens money rapidhole ruins the camcorder markets. I would like to buy usb-c small camcorder. Seems Canon G70 is the only new USB-C camcorder. Sad it does not have IR like AX53 has. I would buy a new camcorder if someone would make those again.
Thanks Juha. Not much we can about what's available. Camera makers follow the money and what sells. Unfortunately camcorders are low on their profit scale.
I feel like I was duped to get a Sony FS7M2.
We're really talking two different animals here. The FS7M2 is in a different league. Big, powerful and expensive with lenses vs small, somewhat limited and a lot less expensive. Portability in a camera is a huge factor for me.
Buyer's remorse can cause serious depression. I've been there. Take care.
Спасибо за информацию. С меня подписка и лайк.
Добро пожаловать и спасибо!
Hold on a sec... motion blur isn't due to FPS... it's due to shutter speed. If you shoot with 1/1000s shutter speed at 25fps - there'll be no motion blur. The video won't be silky-smooth like 60fps, but motion blur? None.
One big downside of this wonderful camcorder is that, like many camcorders, they are hardcoded PAL or NTSC. For me, as a European, our Ax53 or Ax43 are only recording 25p or 50p - no 30p, 24p or 60p... Unfortunately
Hoya 55mm Pro-1 Digital UV protector is slim enough that it doesn’t show any vignette. No step up filter needed.
Thanks Pat. That info is sure to be helpful to someone.
lol walking sticks 😅
old man camera.
Thank you