Piaget - The A Not B Error (Sensorimotor Stage)
Вставка
- Опубліковано 1 жов 2024
- Why does the child, who now has some understanding of object permanence, commit the A-Not-B error?
How would developmental systems theories or core knowledge theories explain this error?
no shame kid, I screw up like this sometimes too
😔
😂😂😂 Me too
A small mistake for the kid, but a huge step forward for science.
Wow you can tell she had trouble getting the toy from the baby.
Y
Seems like the child is not even able to reach the cloth in the left side of him.
My thoughts exactly!
i think kids would still attempt to reach the other side, they wouldn't be able to tell if they could reach it or not before trying
It's true, it seems their wee arms aren't long enough. The experiment shows the child looks for the toy in the same place as they found it last time (A-not-B searching).
The infant is in stage 4 (out of 6) in developing object permanence.
Tears...for science!!! =D
that was nothing have you heard about little Albert experiments
I usually laugh when people "make excuses for the baby" but I'm going to say that she didn't look like she saw it go under there. There may be a strong case for arguing that she actually believed it to be under "A".
I thought so to that she didnt look like she saw it
What would happen if she changed the color of one of the cloths? Would that make any difference in the outcome? Does anyone know of an experiment that did that? If so do you have a video link that you could share?
They had experiments with transparent covers so the baby could even see where the thing was but still would pick A all the time.
That’s some bullshut experiment. The bay couldn’t reach the cover at all,
@@TheDarkAngel396 Isn't there thoughts that it is more due to motor/muscle memory and not that the baby ACTUALLY thinks the toy is under cloth A?
It’s ok little baby. I would cry to if I thought my monkey toy vanished 😥
this kid is definitely not going to college
The baby is between 8 and 12 month and he cannot inhibit the learned gesture. It has been studied by Houdé and explained by the inibitory control theory.
aww this baby is so cute.
Wow thank you for uploading this, very helpful !
To do what?
@@jimmicrackhead12 research baby cognitive behaviour
couldnt even reach B doe
seems not me the baby is right handed so reaching for the right side was much more conventional for her. If the experiment was switched around and the toy was first placed on the left side... would she still have reached for the left. or would she have gone for the right side.
we can see the baby is sitted slanted with her left side more towards the back while her right side, right arm, is more to the front and thus she prefers to reach things with her right hand towards the right side
Actually, this experiment was done several times with several different kids. It's a thing babies do when they are under 10 months old because the part of their brains that holds that kind of memory is still not fully developed.
Talk about biased experimenter .... Making lots Adult-Child speech sounds during the A task (like playing a game) and as soon as its the B task - may have well of blindfolded the baby - didnt even ensure the baby saw it going under it! I am aware this has being replicated so many times however its concerning ...
very correct.
it seems to me the infant wanted to check B but was not in reachable distance.. she even maintained a gaze under B. biased experiment?
It's good that you noticed that because that's actually the point of the experiment; to highlight the neurodevelopmental changes in the development of the prefrontal cortex. Basically, the parietal lobes that control motor movement are much faster than the underdeveloped PFC in kids that controls reasoning. So the phenomena observed is that this infant knows where the toy is (hence why she reaches for A despite looking at B, therefore a fully developed sense of object permanence) yet she continues her conditioned habitual response (reaching for A) because of the lack of control over her behaviour.
thats not a bias, but i think you are right about your other assumption
This isn't a biased experiment because it's not an experiment, it's just a video someone posted on UA-cam. (;
very true
The fact that the baby is reaching for position B is not due to the experiment but rather the flaw in Piagets theory in general. Yes the baby reaches for A, but this is due to a difficulty overriding the motor response of its arm. It knows where the object is, that is why it looks to position B but it cannot override the automatic response of the arm.
赤ちゃんバカすぎてワロタ
俺ならこんなミス絶対に犯さない自信がある。
Mind Boggling...
Can anyone fathom why the infant fails to check B yet still checks A?
Jean Piaget believes that it is because they have a lack of or incomplete object permanence (the understanding that something still exists even when out of sight). However some behaviourists believe it's because the child has been reinforced the action that if they look in location A then the toy would be there. I dont think there's a set answer for this but just suggestions.
Piaget seems to be wrong, it is associated with lack of neural development in the PFC.
Miller and Cohen (2001) put it this way:
"Lurking within all of us is a machinery whose default mode of operation is to respond to the most salient stimulus in the environment, or act in the most habitual, stereotyped way."
The most salient stimulus is the reinforced location A.
Even though the child has knowledge about object permanence, it does not have the neural abitlities to inhibit the most habitual reaction and reaches for location A.
If you are interested in this topic, read chapter 14 of Essentials Of Cognitive Neuroscience by Postle.
Stephen Pryce No problem, i am researching this topic myself, because i have to do a presentation about it on Friday ;)
On the topic of object permanence, check the video description:
"Why does the child, who now has some understanding of object permanence, commit the A-Not-B error?
How would developmental systems theories or core knowledge theories explain this error?"
The child has knowledge about object permanence, maybe Jessie Au didn't read that or just reacted in the most habitual way, because this kind of experiment is mostly shown in context of object permanence ;)
Another way to explain it, is the lack of development in working memory, but Stedron, Sahni and Munaka (2005) did an variation of this experiment with no load on working memory, but the A not B error still occurs, so in my limited knowledge i still prefer the lack oh inhibitory control due to lack of PFC development.
Remember when comments were wholesome like this?
@@rinserofwinds Thanks, dude! im using this for my essay!
I think the experimenter didn't give the baby the same amount of time to look where the object went to: biased.
It's evident in the astonishing difference between
0:10 ///. and 1:05 ///.
Agreed. The subject seemed distracted when the researcher placed the toy under towel B.
Crybaby
omg she made her cry
Babies can cry over nothing too so its fine
babie 🥺🥺🥺🥺🥺🥺
stop torturing this poor child 😭
Sooo cute!
Echt cooles viedeo...
I too would cry if I failed an A not B test.
So basically the kid hasn't developed object permanence as they were not aware that the object was put in a different spot??
The child has some form of object permanence because they are aware the object exists even when it is not in sight. In earlier stages, object permanence is missing and demonstrated by showing a child and object then removing it. The child acts as if the object simply never existed. :)
baby boey
hoi
so cute😭😭😭😭
el bebe esta aburrido
How olds the baby?
9 months :)
Hello, my name is Armando Plascencia and I am the Student Accommodations Coordinator for Student Disability Resources at California State University Monterey Bay. The purpose of this letter is to request authorization to modify this video as instructional audiovisual material to include adequate captioning for deaf and hard of hearing students attending CSU Monterey Bay. The video will be used solely for educational purposes.
Welll they have subtitles... just click on that button that says cc and you will see the "lyrics" of the video///