Except that she burnt her enemies and promised to raze cities and armies since the very beginning. She's not ''mad'' (noone uses that word in the real modern word), she's a dictator and she always had it in her. Yes, the writing was still rushed and bad but it wasn't out of nowhere. She was just like any other character - obsessed with revenge and power-hungry, the only difference was having dragons which made her even more entitled. Also, please look on modern dictators and their ''commanders'' who raze towns and villages to the ground. They are not ''mad'' because they know exactly what they are doing, they just don't care. Daenerys stopped caring either. She never did it ''for people'' but for herself only.
Probably George gave some things to dumb and dumber that will happen in the books, but they could'nt make a reason for that and just said "lets make her burn kings landing, because.....yeah"
The only right choice to sit on the throne. Not f*cking Raisin Bran. To be honest, I think anyone would have been a better choice than Raisin Bran 🤦♀️
@@Adanu191 Way better leader, conqueror and a queen than half of the "main characters.". She was sabotaged, betrayed and manipulated almost by everyone in her council. if u read the books or even watch the show again you will realise how stupid ur comment is. It amazes me how people like you dont understand her character.😂
@@Adanu191 She wasn't. Inspiring perhaps, but she was overbearing, excessively brutal, and paranoid to degrees even the Mad King would've been proud of. She also had a tendency to grant herself increasingly grandiose titles and behave as if she ruled the world well before she even came close to doing so.
She was burning her enemies and promising to raze cities and armies in her quest for revenge and power since season 2 - and viewers were still expecting her to be some benevolent saint. Yes, the writing in the end was crap and it was all very rushed but it was not out of nowhere. Ultimately, she was just like any other character - obsessed with revenge and power-hungry, the only difference was her having dragons which ultimately made her even more entitled and arrogant than anyone else. She never did it ''for people'' but for herself only which is why eventually she stopped caring about ''collateral victims''.
It would've probably made more sense for her to kill innocents by accident, by doing something like burning down the red keep after they surrendered. She was shown to be ruthless to her enemies, but still wanting the best for the common people, so her just flying through the streets killing everyone doesn't make sense, so I think her targeting the homes of the royals would've been more in character, made more sense, and at least be a little more understandable, since they just killed one of her most trusted friends.
@@frogimation Maybe, but by season 6-7 she saw almost everyone as her enemy. And after Missandei execution common people of kings landing definitely was "her enemy"
@frogimation yep. If she had flown off WHILE the bells were ringing that would've been great. And it would've fit a huge theme in got too... sometimes, even though you tryto do things right sometimes....too little too late
@@katherine8604 The fact that you had to specify "men" instead of people or characters shows a not so subtle hint of sexism charging your comment. But you're still right. Wanna know the difference though? You don't see us men calling any of them saviours or heroes. Not the way women did with Daenerys to the point of naming their daughters after her. I never met a father who named his son Ramsay after Ramsay Bolton 😂
She should have listened to Olynna "I've met many clever men I've outlived them all. Want to know why I ignored them"
She did listen, hence why she ignored Tyrion and Varys when they told her to not murder the innocents of king's landing :(
If being triggered were a reason to become mad, every character in GOT would have become mad
Except that she burnt her enemies and promised to raze cities and armies since the very beginning. She's not ''mad'' (noone uses that word in the real modern word), she's a dictator and she always had it in her. Yes, the writing was still rushed and bad but it wasn't out of nowhere. She was just like any other character - obsessed with revenge and power-hungry, the only difference was having dragons which made her even more entitled. Also, please look on modern dictators and their ''commanders'' who raze towns and villages to the ground. They are not ''mad'' because they know exactly what they are doing, they just don't care. Daenerys stopped caring either. She never did it ''for people'' but for herself only.
@@yevgeniyaleshchenko849 golly-gee a dictator in a setting with absolute rulers
Probably George gave some things to dumb and dumber that will happen in the books, but they could'nt make a reason for that and just said "lets make her burn kings landing, because.....yeah"
The only right choice to sit on the throne. Not f*cking Raisin Bran. To be honest, I think anyone would have been a better choice than Raisin Bran 🤦♀️
2:49 IS SO FUNNY I CANTTTTR
0:40 proud husband moment
thats my baby frr!! QUEEEEEEN
Amazes me anyone still thinks she was a good leader.
@@Adanu191 Way better leader, conqueror and a queen than half of the "main characters.". She was sabotaged, betrayed and manipulated almost by everyone in her council. if u read the books or even watch the show again you will realise how stupid ur comment is. It amazes me how people like you dont understand her character.😂
@@Adanu191 She wasn't. Inspiring perhaps, but she was overbearing, excessively brutal, and paranoid to degrees even the Mad King would've been proud of. She also had a tendency to grant herself increasingly grandiose titles and behave as if she ruled the world well before she even came close to doing so.
@@Adanu191
It is the mericans show them freeing svl and they will consider that person a messiah.
She was burning her enemies and promising to raze cities and armies in her quest for revenge and power since season 2 - and viewers were still expecting her to be some benevolent saint. Yes, the writing in the end was crap and it was all very rushed but it was not out of nowhere. Ultimately, she was just like any other character - obsessed with revenge and power-hungry, the only difference was her having dragons which ultimately made her even more entitled and arrogant than anyone else. She never did it ''for people'' but for herself only which is why eventually she stopped caring about ''collateral victims''.
It would've probably made more sense for her to kill innocents by accident, by doing something like burning down the red keep after they surrendered.
She was shown to be ruthless to her enemies, but still wanting the best for the common people, so her just flying through the streets killing everyone doesn't make sense, so I think her targeting the homes of the royals would've been more in character, made more sense, and at least be a little more understandable, since they just killed one of her most trusted friends.
@@frogimation Maybe, but by season 6-7 she saw almost everyone as her enemy. And after Missandei execution common people of kings landing definitely was "her enemy"
@@user-rv7uk9iz8v ofc thats because G RR Martin was not involved anymore and they didnt know what to do with Dany
@frogimation yep. If she had flown off WHILE the bells were ringing that would've been great. And it would've fit a huge theme in got too... sometimes, even though you tryto do things right sometimes....too little too late
spamming this many posts in one hour is a great way to lose 176k subscribers.
he probably just got all these videos removed and now he's reposting them
Cry
@@Doehini i respect that you took over a month to come up with this amazing reply. I can't wait to see what you bring in late August.
cope
@@CyclopsWasRight616tell me when he comes up with another godly response
Daenerys was monster all the time...she was mad from season 1....its good she was killed
So was Tywin, joffery, ramsay, roose, and many other men
true@@katherine8604
@@katherine8604true, but none of them never call themselves a "savior"
@@katherine8604 The fact that you had to specify "men" instead of people or characters shows a not so subtle hint of sexism charging your comment.
But you're still right. Wanna know the difference though? You don't see us men calling any of them saviours or heroes. Not the way women did with Daenerys to the point of naming their daughters after her. I never met a father who named his son Ramsay after Ramsay Bolton 😂